[000:00:00;00] we see that work is being done, western countries are constantly looking for and helping us with ammunition, because i am sure they perfectly understand how great our need is for all types of ammunition now in order to carry out successful counteroffensive actions in the future, you know, because the espresso tv channel is joining and already a lot what did we do? well, how do we act as mediators for this? our viewers who donate to various things needed for the army . again, such a word is not an opener of any secrets, if it is something there, you cannot say, but the percentage ratio, how many today cover the needs, well, in particular, of your unit

, if you say so. or there on the first to the second line please the basic needs are covered by the basic needs of providing our unit and as far as i understand most units of the armed forces and at the expense of the state and definitely at the expense of volunteers at the expense of human sacrifices, but as i already said about the shells, the same is true about the other provision, it is needed more, more and more if we focus on our offensive actions from our side, and they will undoubtedly start sooner or later because we need to release all our territories within the limits of the 91st year and, for example, copters are consumables very often due to different, in principle, i think that we have almost time for a conversation, but then i gave mr. oleksandr to finish at least this thought and

then we already added our next guest before the conversation, we will talk about mariupol and the fact that tonight, as a real father, mr. alexander , please pick up where you left off, please continue , so that we can already get an answer to this question , yes, too. we always need thermal imagers because we have a lot of them now there is a large volume of the armed forces, almost a million people are now involved, we understand how many fighters we have and we need thermal imagers, we need night vision devices, these are the main positions that we will always need and which with whom the volunteers can help. i thank you very much for the conversation. thank you for telling us more about the situation in the ughledar direction. oleksandr voytko, a serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine - this is the southeast , the enemy there suffers significant losses that demoralize him, but despite the demoralization

, the enemy continues to push and push and push at everyone directions and on ughledar in particular now we will talk about mariupol with us on the connection mykola lysichenko president of mariupol television p mykola greets you p vasyl good evening putin as a real maniac and a real bandit came to the scene of the crime, what is interesting is today's information that the un recognized that it was russia that destroyed the mariupol drama theater, killing hundreds of people in it. well, on the month of this crime, vladimir putin came at night and also visited the philharmonic, and there is some here is the logic. why did he come there? i just want to hear your opinion. as a mariupol resident, you will understand more about the ruins and the blood . they are trying to build some kind of new conditional life. the russians, please. listen, vasyl. it is very difficult for me to understand volodymyr volodymyrovych. yes, but what i am, what i see, yes, i see that this is putin's emotional, spontaneous, impulsive reaction to yesterday's news

about the arrest warrant. he needed to show his inner consumer that he is a man, that he can and here he spontaneously came to mariupol, the fact that the arrival was spontaneous can be seen, even from these videos , there is not a single representative of the occupation administration of mariupol next to him , that is, he did not warn them and he does not trust them, does not trust them, and how he does not trust them to the people of mariupol as a whole, because you see this laura piano jacket for one and a half million rubles ah, which is a couple of sizes bigger why because he is wearing a very heavy bro- bronik he will now be seen this gesture is because he is uncomfortable because the bronik

it weighs very, very much. there are footage of him driving a car. when he drives a car , the clock shows eh 7-18, that is, half past seven in the evening. not that, but because the heavy armored car is pressing on the old vi- war and him their little paws are leaking and here he is often often there. and what else can be seen in these shots , uh, in the car there, when you see him sweating , you can see that it is wet, and he is sweating . it's scary in the occupied city, he's scared. wow- the hair is wet but he came there, he demonstratively showed that this is his city and that they will restore it, this is a bell so much

for us, although you and i must understand that probably the most decisive, the biggest battle of this war will be precisely for mariupol because putin showed today that russia will cling to this place with its teeth, with the teeth of the dragon, which they install everywhere with the toothless hands of those prisoners, the wagnerites, but they will fight for mariupol, and the second bell is for the people of donetsk, as far as i read the donetsk public today they are in shock, why are they in shock? because putin, in all 9 years of war, even in the eight years when donbas was bombed , he never came to donetsk, nor to luhansk. nowhere, and the people there now do not understand what this is all

about. 9th year eh with the russians peace and here some mariupol who didn't give up, who didn't want to join the russian world, but then when she came there, he looked at some interesting pictures or a presentation that that half-poker in a cap showed him, whose last name i can't pronounce, i can't believe something in me, there's something there that's how he showed him pictures of the restoration of the city, the restoration of mariupol, told him about the tens of billions of rubles that are still needed there , at the same time, putin and you already have to give an account of the fact that putin er-er knew for sure what was happening to mariupol a-a v last year, he is personally responsible for all this because if you remember vasyl as a media person

a year ago, there were negotiations in istanbul , including laurel and kuleba bread. then about 70% of his time he devoted to mariupol . he asked us to be given a humanitarian corridor in both directions . in other words, we need food and to take us out, which lavrov then clearly told him that he does not have authority to make decisions in mariupol because only putin decides something in mariupol just so that we have time, well, that kind of thing. yes, putin has found a new city of glory

. i understand. and the provision of humanitarian aid, the humanitarian situation, and what are the russians there, do they give people at least some kind of housing for those who lost those who remained in the city, food , earnings, the most important thing for a person’s life , please, ah, the most important thing is that there, what are the people there? people don't live, they survive every day to live more or less er, it's normal but only those who cooperate with the occupation administration of the city can, and that's exactly the kind of people they came out to putin in the evening when he arrived, this is how potemkin's houses look in the background, it's somewhere around 8:00 in the evening, that is people should be at home, but most of the windows are dark. that is, there are no people there. very, very few people live there. apartments are mostly local

. some live anywhere. in some places, which are more or less normal, and it is very important that he came to the philharmonic, where they planned to hold a tribunal over azov, whom they later exchanged for putin's godfather, i think it is putin who will be in that hall, and it is in that hall that the international tribunal must take place, right there in mariupol, as in the city of the quintessence of everything that russia has done and does in our country, i managed. cool the information in fact and the details that mykola noticed, and they are very important for understanding the mood and state of the dictator, and for the fact that mariupol will still return to ukraine , of course we understand that it will not be that simple, but mariupol is actually the key to that that this is a blocked corridor from crimea and this

is a story that the enemy does not like very much well , mykola sechenko was with us, the president of mariupol television, but as valery luzh, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, said, mariupol will be ukrainian and i i believe depending on much more, and putin i don’t believe at all, and you too, well, i trust serhiy izovtsiv, my colleague , he is the director of the agency, the defect express, while leading , says the military results of the day . today we will talk about what is happening on the front line, and what bills are being prepared in parliament and whether they will really limit the rights of our military, about this in a moment. so, first about the fronts , even if british intelligence says that the enemy is exhausting its offensive potential, so in my opinion it is still better to focus on the assessments of the general staff and the command

of the ground forces, colonel- general sirskyi, who is responsible for the khortyts group, says that in fact, along the entire eastern front line, the enemy is conducting offensive actions, trying to break through the defense of our troops and the fiercest battles continue about them flint belohryivka disputed and the epicenter of hostilities, of course, remains bakhmut, the battles for the city continue and the enemy uses all its forces and tries to break through the defenses in several directions and completely surround the city, because they are advancing in the north, east and south of the city, and the enemy is suffering heavy losses and once again retreating without success. unfortunately, we also have losses, but much less than our defenses inflict on the enemy in some areas, our units have a partial success this is the general picture, and we will try to find out the details with our distinguished guest - this is a novel by kostenko

, defender of ukraine, colonel of the sbu, people 's deputy, secretary of the parliamentary committee on national security, defense and intelligence p. roman, i congratulate you on a good day and a good evening. it's good to see and hear you, and i would still like you, taking into account your experience, to first of all assess the situation around bakhmut, because serhiy cherevaty , the spokesman for the team, the spokesman for the eastern group , speaks about the fact that the enemy actually cannot perform its tactical tasks, but it is still trying to advance on the city, which scenario do you consider the most improbable in the near future ? first of all, the commanders-in-chief and the commander-in-chief yes, and the representatives of the stake, but what is objectively visible, we see that the situation there is difficult and it can depend on

, let's say, its positive or negative decision there from one serious counteroffensive of the enemy of success if he god forbid it will reach him somewhere in some direction. it can close for us, well, in particular , the city and these roads are the only ones left, so i say once again that the question here is that you need to understand that and the command. i think you see it is very good that you either retreat to pre-prepared positions. i think this is a decision in general, some kind of decision will have to be made or counteroffensive actions must be taken, because no matter how threatening the situation is, it cannot be done like this all the time when the ticks are ticking. well, or to take the initiative somewhere in another direction so that the enemy is forced to transfer reserves and what the circus says says that they really have now seized large reserves near er-e bahmut

, we know that they are from er-e russian federation they transfer those who still came out of the kherson right-bank plasma . they also transferred most of them there, and with the help of this they strengthened their group. the selection was taken out of the kherson bridgehead under the pressure of the armed forces and concentrated precisely in this direction on the eastern e in order to win some kind of victory for themselves normally , and now the situation of dynamics is similar around eh avdiivka because the enemy is also trying to iron and create an overhang there in the north on avdiivka. how do you assess the dynamics on this part of the front, i will say. so we all focused our attention on bakhmut because, from the russian point

of view, you know, bakhmut has turned into such a policy there are many interests of the political forces that are already fighting inside the russian federation . to win some kind of victory, and here you spent a lot of time in that avdiivka is no less dangerous direction, it's just that less is said about it and there the enemy is also trying to advance, i 'll say more maryanka well, there are very serious battles, it's just that there is no such threatening situation, little girl, in fact, there is uh, let's say a field for maneuver, but in this way it is dangerous because operatives, after all, he managed to create a threat to the encirclement, therefore serious battles are also going on in these directions, the enemy is trying to uh, advance our troops, and we need to be careful in these directions. well you know, there is still a question, what if we evaluate the troops? what, for example, maryinka? our paratroopers are stationed there

. i won't say which brigade. i think everyone knows there on the internet. uh, one uh, serious brigade is standing on avdiivka, it defended mykolaiv too , and here you need to understand that there are serious brigades standing prepared and they are holding despite the fact that the enemy, uh, the enemy, uh, prevails in relation to bakhmut, there are many different units there maybe this is the problem the question is that there are many different units and it is quite difficult to conduct interactions between them, this also needs to be worked out, so i tried to say it correctly. well, we will return to this question later in our conversation, but i wanted us to complete the front line like this and mention the zaporizhia direction, the zaporizhia front which i am familiar with you now, well, in more detail, there were, uh, wallpaper intelligence from our side . it seems that the front is starting to come alive, what

are the dynamics during this week, uh, well, uh, now, in general, i think the front will start to use let's say today today was good weather and yesterday good weather is already happening in ukraine and i think that the front will start to come alive simply at the cost of the front now the land will dry up and first of all the enemy will try to use more equipment now you have more manpower is fighting in the east, and from our side we will have the opportunity to carry out some offensive or just active actions. therefore, now it is still, as you correctly said, combat reconnaissance, now each of the sides will look for weak points where it is possible to break through the defense where you can develop success, this applies not only

to the front edge, but to some er you can achieve success in general there in order to get success in the spring-summer company eh, then continuing the situation with the assessment of the situation in the armed forces and on the fronts, i will mention one publication that appeared literally yesterday, there expels the icon of the cities, wrote about what in the ukrainian army there is actually a culture war, on the one hand, there are officers who have received training in the west and are betting on the implementation of the operation according to the principle of the mission, when the general goal is understood and all possibilities are drawn under it, and there is a part of the old officers, why does she say there are also people who adhere to soviet approaches that require clear follow-up according to the rules and the procedure of actions and sometimes it fetters the initiative on the ground, and this edition claims that such a war is ongoing in

the ukrainian army and it actually makes it more difficult adaptation of our armed forces to the challenges facing the armed forces today. is there such a confrontation? and if not , what things should be improved so that our army would be more flexible in terms of responding to current threats? well, you know, this is a very difficult topic, a real difficult one. the topic now is to discuss our officers, there is still a third category of officers, of which there are a lot now , those who just graduated from military departments, which , in principle, service in the army was not the last occupation, but somewhere around 18 years old, they have been there for 20 years they finished, they learned the basics. and now they came and lead er, during the war, also combat units, and to manage a unit, er, you yourself know this, and the psychology of fighters is knowledge of tactics, knowledge of new weapons, in addition to the one you learned, for example, many years ago, eh and

there are a lot of factors that influence and it is really possible that not all of them make it, but on the contrary, those officers who came , for example, the chief of staff, show themselves civilly , for example, better than those, so it depends personally on the person who came, what kind of abilities she has in general, the idea of ​​war, i often say again and also show themselves to be better mobilized than there staff soldiers and the opposite happens because of that, everyone has their own approach but the main thing we need to know is that we must have a stable management system, officers should probably be appointed based on leadership qualities uh, first of all, and uh, you need to be uh, very careful in order to uh, in order to uh, after all, ipsori rural also works, we understand that they pick up every phrase, we have to understand what to manage at all levels uh -e have soldiers and

have officers and generals who were also soldiers in the trenches and understand that they don’t just fight with arrows on maps, but they understood what it is like for a soldier in a trench and this is very important. i, for example , let’s say when i took part in hostilities. i will ask myself a task, a question, would i go there and would i complete this task, and unfortunately, there are cases when it is just a point and go ahead without anything, well , let's say it like this, there should be no, there should be clear plans, there should be -th preparation has to be a management system to work interaction is what we said when there are problematic issues when there may be many separate units and they have in common if they are directed correctly they have power and they can repel any army there, let's say any number and you can take a lot those units will break the interaction, throw them on each of them in a separate unit in a separate

direction, after that, make it so that they do not know who is the neighbor on the left, the neighbor on the right, and it will just be a bunch of such fragmented of units that cannot normally carry out a combat mission, this is not allowed, interaction in war is one of the main factors when you fully know who you are, what your senior commander's artillery is, who is the neighbor on the right, who is on the left , the technique that you can use, which you have strong means, this is important, it happens that they neglect it and it ends miserably , that's why, of course, you need to train them, and even those who are called up from civilian life. they need to be immediately thrown into battle, and in order to they went through training and they were already adapted to combat operations. that's why there is such a pm phrase that it's easy to draw an arrow, it's easy to live it , it's

difficult. we learn from our own experience, because when we get to severodonetsk lysychansk from soledar, there are nuances that this interaction does not delve into, but there is a feeling that we are still drawing conclusions from our mistakes, because if we do not do this, then we will actually enter it again and again well , there is a vicious circle of negative consequences somewhere we draw conclusions, but unfortunately, somewhere conclusions are not drawn, and this is necessary. this applies to everything , including the preparation of soldiers before the introduction of hostilities and the introduction of hostilities themselves, conducting defensive operations, there are many such factors. therefore, we still have a lot to work on. well, here, by the way , the question is related with the role of the parliament and democratic control, but using the example of a situation that is already known to everyone, i heard your comment about the battalion commander there

of the 46th airmobile brigade there, anatolia with the call sign kupol, who said that we have there are problems with training, there are problems with ammunition, there are problems with the mobilized, and in fact he violated a layer of problems that must be solved as a result of this announcement of this information, which is actually common knowledge, and the battalion commander was transferred to another position , in fact, frankly, lowering the combat capability of the battalion itself, because the battalion trusts the commander and if we remove the commander, we create problems for this unit , but in any case, what are your assessments of whether an officer can say such things and how should he do it respond to the ministry of defense, and if problems are raised, they must be solved. and if they are not solved, then a new function of parliamentary control and parliamentarians enters into a new function to somehow solve these problems in an optimal way. your

vision of this history is again a difficult question, but i will try to you know, the case here is that you can say that an officer should not say such a thing. yes, no , but if the officer said it, and especially the officer is a bunch of people, then the problem has already hurt because, as he said, he already appealed and he said simply, i’ll say more, i’m on the committee. i appealed to the higher-ups of our er military er let’s say er commanders and to whom i also told at the beginning of summer and at the end of may and throughout. as he said this problem exists this problem exists well if it has not been solved until now, the commanders have started talking about it, then this problem must be solved. when this problem started to be discussed now after a year of war, and it was during this year of this war and no one wanted to solve it, i

understand that's why about they started saying it if the combatants on the ground say that this means that there is a problem, and it should not be brought up here . a we need to solve this question , ask the soldiers, it should be done in a survey, because they write to me in my personal e-e and on facebook, and i describe this problem in parliamentary questions. i reported it, but no decision was made, the squads started to talk. tomorrow the companies will start talking about it. so it is necessary to listen to this first of all and fix this problem and give us more training. if they tell us we don't have time for it, recruit people earlier, prepare them for several months and send if there is a problem, it must be solved by this. that we removed the battalion commander from his post, this problem cannot be solved here. it can be divided into two questions : should he have spoken and what kind of punishment was done to him? will this issue be resolved, perhaps kombat knew that it would not happen and he put his career

, let's say, on it, he sacrificed it in order for someone to understand that there is a problem, and there really is a problem, ask anyone the commanders will say this problem that he does not have such a problem, i talk to many people, the problem must be solved and not turn a blind eye to it, there is an effort to simply remove the combatant tomorrow, the second will say the third, the fifth , who will already be in pain and that we will remove everyone and put others that's why it's just a problem. it's necessary to solve a-a dome to give an opportunity to further defend your state there in your position if they say that he is effective combat and we don't have very much at the moment let's say it's not an excessive number of good officers who if you can just scatter them i absolutely agree with your conclusions. and now with a question to you as a parliamentarian, because there is a draft law 42:10, which made a lot of noise in the expert environment in the political environment, where it is actually said that

the draft law will be presented there in the near future for consideration. from the point of view of the issue, there are authors of european integration, but it affects the restriction of the rights of the military there to run for office, to express one's political point of view, and so on. please tell me what is true and what is a lie in this story. it is true that draft law 42:10 is 42 e-e 42.10 d revised it is e-e draft law that was clearly initiated e-e submitted by the cabinet of ministers from the ministry of defense it was still in the 19th year or in the 20th year before the war then he was also voted before the war in the 22nd year in the february match but he was a little different than he is now he was voted and then like many others he was put in the long box because he was not at the time the issue of some reformist reforms in the ministry of defense

was thought about in terms of approaching the standards nato, but in a matter of moments, while it was refined there this year, who would have had time to work with it in the committees, it has turned into something that, on the contrary , pushes us away from the nato standards, well , let's say that's how it was resuscitated then. when they wanted to push through this norm, they found the minister of war, they thought : where did we go, and this is what we have, in principle, about reforms, let's go there when you remember, they would like to change different people who wanted to put a military person there and