[000:00:00;00] this is a process so that a person's family receives the appropriate social benefits and state guarantees, since when the quick procedure is carried out urgently and in full, then only the state power is considered people -centered, and the content was also marked by transferring the relevant functions to the ministry of veterans' affairs. the shoulders of the employees of the ministry of defense. that is , many issues need to be resolved there, and the ministry of veterans affairs. well, as far as i understand, it could put a shoulder because it is not, well, it is also an important story that should also, in theory, be part of their functionality. maybe i'm wrong. there are veterans' registers

, where there are combatants and war participants, and people who received a disability. ok, that is, all the information comes to them, and then there are other registers , the register of defenders, the register of the missing. so far, there are no drastic measures for a person to turn to the state authorities and not to go through these mines of others, and for them to be issued that certificate , it is necessary that she received the status, then she wants another and received benefits, you understand right away , it is important at the time when people are looking for when people they don't know. basically, is he in captivity, is he wanted, or is he dead ? it's important to support the human being, not just to write that we are adding psychological help to you, which is not provided, so we believe that part of

the powers when a person is already a person, shall we say so she served yes, that's for sure, he is a veteran , if you need to find out the circumstances of where she is, that's also when they came and they made all the necessary inquiries, we make all the necessary inquiries and the coordination headquarters for the treatment of rural prisoners is also in it and in the mkcha and in the united for this and thank you thank you to all the state bodies they all provide us with answers and thank you for the fact that thanks to these certificates we will receive our family who contacted us knows where she is already or is waiting for information about the location her native person thank you ms. lyudmila for this extremely important and fruitful conversation lyudmila denysova human rights defender head of the ukrainian

center for the protection of human rights exo powers of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on human affairs let 's move on 17:00 32 minutes we will remind you of important messages. what the russians were doing today in zaporizhzhia . as of now, we know about 20 wounded victims and one person who was hospitalized. unfortunately, unfortunately, he died in the hospital . the air raids in the ukrainian regions do not stop either. follow them, please, and take care of your own safety. well, the security service of ukraine detained the adjuster of the russian missile attack on the school in kramatorsk, the press service of the sbu and the prosecutor 's office of the donetsk region inform about it the invaders launched a missile attack on the school in kramatorsk on march 5 of this year, he was scouting the combat positions of units of the armed forces of ukraine in the front

-line areas of the region, the russian curators were particularly interested in the coordinates of the location of long-range foreign weapons of the ukrainian troops, the sbu counter-intelligence agents received the intruder while he was carrying out an enemy reconnaissance mission, according to the investigation, he was an accomplice the invaders turned out to be an employee of the factory in kramatorsk, and they involved him in secret cooperation in march of the 23rd year collected in intelligence information , he sent a liaison to the agent like this. well, it's good that they were caught, surely a very interesting video will appear , which will give us some details of what happened in one of the bays of sevastopol, currently occupied crimea, if we can show this video now, it is in fact, with the specified time and er specified date, all this happens on the night of er march 22 , that is, tonight. well, the anti-aircraft

defense is working, as far as we understand er something. only, we see, it is not very effective . the authenticity of this video is currently being checked. certainly, but uh well, they definitely led to certain thoughts, without a doubt, in the meantime, three residents of mykolaiv oblast were killed when they blew up a mini-russian. mykolaiv police reports that the tragedy happened on wednesday in snyuriv oblast, the residents of the villages of sadnyi went across the field to the forest to collect firewood, and in a moment, a car exploded, all three died . left by the russians, an anti-tank mine took the lives of three men . police explosives technicians and representatives of the state emergency service are working on the spot . one of them forbids assigning to a geographical object in ukraine names that glorify, perpetuate, promote or symbolize the occupying state about this, and

not only we will talk with volodymyr vyatrovych, people's deputy of ukraine , historian, mr. volodymyr, congratulations glory to ukraine glory to the heroes well, how will it be to act in accordance with the adopted law, that is, who can fall under its influence, so to speak, and who cannot fall under it well, first of all, i would like to add that in fact, in the second reading, this law is somewhat expanded, we already say no only about new names, but we are also talking about the renaming of all those names that are one way or another related to russian perelism in ukraine, that is, the process of renaming and dismantling the symbols of the russian empire will be launched, absolutely analogous to those that were in the process of decommunization, whoever actually corrected them will be subject to e- e renaming or dismantling of monuments , it is obvious that only historical figures who were leaders or military leaders or political leaders of various forms of e russia

starting from the muscovite empire and ending by the modern russian federation, it is obvious that we are talking about events related to russian history, it is obvious that the same was true of artists who were a kind of troubadours of russian imperialism, so i am convinced that ukraine itself has finally received a certain legitimate a framework for these until now spontaneous processes of the declaration, volodymyr well, what will be most interesting now is how we should be, so to speak, with those troubadours of russian imperialism who were ukrainians and who were forced to become the corresponding troubadours, i don’t want to now to read and quote the late work of the same tychyna or bazan and so on from the list, we understand that

their pantheon was quite powerful and they all left what is called, so to speak, an imperial narrator, how will something happen to them oh no shors , forgive me lord what exactly falls under even under decommunization, if it concerns yours and your fault, then it is obvious that the law provides for certain exceptions for those people who can be considered those who contributed to the development of ukrainian culture . the first ones that will now be in the focus of the attention of people who will be engaged in decolonization because in fact we still have to clean the country of strict potomkini and others who absolutely and very clearly fall under the influence of this law, just then, obviously, we will move on to some discussions about which of those ukrainians who served the empire should

also be subject to this law or, on the contrary , should be subject to exceptions, taking into account some of his contributions to the development of ukrainian culture , this is how we understand an extremely difficult story because well, here it is still possible to finalize the relevant legislation , and perhaps simply history will put everything on the shelves, an equally important story is now going on around the kiev-pechersk lavra. so we understand that literally there yesterday, yesterday or the day before yesterday, somehow, on some day of the groundhog, information is happening with one in a word, the leaders of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, or the branch of the russian orthodox church in ukraine , went to see president zelensky well in advance, so to speak it was not agreed upon, they were offered to keep the papers. well, accordingly, they expressed, so to speak, their disagreement with completely understandable decisions, yes. well, the ukrainian shrine should

serve the ukrainian people, mr. volodymyr , how will the story with the kiev-pechersk lavra unfold, in fact, it is difficult to predict now, i could say how it will unfold. if a law were passed that would put an end to the existence of the russian orthodox church in ukraine, unfortunately, this law is not the only thing that is not supported in the parliament , even so far they are afraid to introduce it the draft laws are still standing, they are afraid to put them before the parliament because i am convinced that it would be interesting to have a discussion to see those politicians who would now be ready to more publicly support the moscow church in ukraine, that is why this is not being done, that is why, unfortunately , there is an opportunity for the russian church to recover and hold some such actions of pressure or the tone of the president, or now i am convinced that it will be an attempt to pollinate the public. yes , they will take place precisely because e unfortunately , for three months now, no very important steps aimed at a legal solution to this issue through the adoption

of the relevant special legislation. what i want to say once again is already prepared , which has already been passed . so to be sure that the point of existence of the moscow church in ukraine will be set so far is difficult, mr. volodymyr, after all, the fate of the monastery and those who now live in it on the territory of its pechersk lavra, that is this was actively discussed yesterday, and the revision that should be carried out there right now to understand what values ​​remain and we hope are on the territory of the lavra at the moment, but still, the monks who are currently there , well, pavlo lebid says that none of the brothers actually express no if you have any desire to join the orthodox church of ukraine , our patriarch epiphany urges you to think about what to transfer and continue your

ministry, how will everything happen, in your opinion, what will happen to those who do not transfer to of the orthodox church of ukraine, will it be some kind of isolated migration, or should it happen when the general decision, uh, again? of course, there is a decision specifically about the lavra, it can be decided at the level of the cult . the patriarchy should leave this room, but this does not solve a more global problem that still needs to be solved at the legislative level and until there is a legislative solution to this issue, unfortunately , the questions you ask are most of them there will be no answer and this leaves the possibility, you know, to manually decide who and what will be, how will be used, in particular , the kiev-pechersk lavra, if there was a legislative dot in the existence of the russian orthodox church, it is obvious that no matter what the question would be

can she use the kiev pechersk lavra and what to do next with the monks of this church, this has not been done, so the possibilities of further scenarios, well, it is very difficult to predict mr. volodymyr, accordingly, i would like to ask you about the prospects, so to speak, of restitution ecclesiastical, in particular, the transfer of the return by the former owner of such or other, as the soviet bureaucrats of cult objects would say. yes, we understand that very often the representatives of the late kuchma or yanukovych authorities resorted to certain abuses of falsification. we understand that the permissions given were not those that should have been given by current legislation and so on and so on, this should actually lead to a review and revision of the rights to use certain shrines, which are undoubtedly the collective property of the ukrainian people yes

in particular, we are talking about separate lavras in western ukraine, central ukraine, and so on and so on, but here it would be necessary, so to speak, to work out the relevant documentation , at the same time we see how in what way they broke the legislation and the right over the knee and completed something in the historical and architectural reserves and after that, certain figures, in particular the already mentioned presidents , so to speak, visuals, this is all history - this is extremely serious and some could be extremely interesting for the dbr, the prosecutor's office and so on, although we understand that now they have something to do without doubt that now we are trying to conduct a fairly thorough investigation into what changes and losses our national cultural heritage has suffered in the form of those in pechersk and other lavs, it is obvious that what needs to be investigated is what exactly has been done, who is to blame for any illegal constructions, reconstructions , even destructions that occurred on the territory

of these objects, but it is also necessary to understand that all this became possible precisely because, unfortunately , for almost 30 years of independent ukraine , the russian orthodox church in ukraine used well, let's be frank in some way political roof, i.e. they knew that no one would check them. they knew that these lease issues were only formal. they would be constantly extended. they knew that they would not allow a single representative of the monument security structure on the territory of the lavra. they would not receive any orders. therefore, it is obvious the situation that is currently developing , which gradually calls for a change in the attitude of the states towards the russian orthodox church , also provides opportunities to investigate, in particular, such losses that we have suffered due to such use of the national and cultural heritage thank you very much mr. volodymyr volodymyr vyatrovych people's deputy of ukraine historian former director of the institute of national memory of ukraine about an extremely important area of ​​our internal life, in particular, it is about

historical or religious justice within the limits of current legislation, the following is emphasized so far, compiled statistics from the business ombudsman of our country say that entrepreneurs complain the most to the boatswain business council about the employees of the service of the security of ukraine and the national police about this business-athlete roman vashchuk told in his last interview with ukrinform that the bureau of economic security did not work at full capacity and therefore is the least cause of complaints. security of ukraine by business bootsman answering the question about which law enforcement agencies complain the most, according to vashchuk , most often entrepreneurs a-a m-m quarrel like this

over the non-return of seized property refusal law enforcement officers to investigate crimes based on the statements of the victimized business, as well as procedural abuses and pressure, unfortunately. well, in the meantime, the russians will change the main targets of the attacks from energy to military . this will be reported by the deputy chief of the main intelligence directorate of the ministry of defense, vadimskibitsky, i quote, let's take the last strike with unmanned aerial vehicles on the night of march 17-18 and on the night of march 21-22 , fuel and lubricant bases were hit in novomoskovsk, zhytomyr, and there were also hits in in the yavoriv district, what were the main targets of the logistics system of our troops and the concentration of our equipment located in the deployment points, the representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense noted, he emphasized that the climate crisis is already over. it can also be military facilities and the concentration of troops and the logistics system of our

groups. well, the state department of the united states of america has published report for the year 2022 in which he assessed the ukrainian media in a certain way, what is the status of er and which well, i don't know er, how the state department gave the name of the state of our media, now we will ask diana dutsyk, executive director of the ukrainian institute of media and communication, member commissions on journalistic ethics ms. diana, congratulations glory to ukraine good day glory to the heroes what they think about the ukrainian media in general are they based on dry facts in the us state department , well, in general, what i saw in the news uh, they evaluate uh, the state of freedom of speech, well, the state of ours

the media is partially free, i think that this is quite an objective assessment, because we are in wartime conditions, and the state of war includes restrictions on freedom of speech, unfortunately . that is, we all see what the issues are. let's say so, there were uh, what information topics, information issues were limited after the full-scale russian invasion, uh , by the corresponding orders of the general staff, and well , approved by the president, yes. that is, we have, we live in such an information field , where there are a number of restrictions related to with war there are undoubtedly many other circumstances that influenced this reduction or narrowing of the media because, again , as a result of the war, a number of media outlets closed down in our country, especially this applies to regional broadcasters of the regional press, primarily in those territories that

were temporarily occupied or in those territories where there are active hostilities, some newsrooms were captured by separatists, including the occupiers, and actually, well, they cannot exist in the form in which they were before the full-scale invasion. the number of collectives was relicited from the east of the rooster to the west of ukraine, and this also affected the format in which they exist today, these editorials, we also know how to almost kill the advertising market, because the economy in our country is difficult now, and of course all these moments can not be in including the level of freedom of speech in the country. even if we now omit the restrictions within the framework of martial law, which i said at the beginning , this limitation within the framework of martial law, that is, well

, for example, three channels were not allowed to a single telethon due to some or other bureaucratic explanations, so to speak, although they were also recognized as unsatisfactory, in particular , it is also about meetings of specialized committees and so on and so on of the verkhovna rada. it's not political, and it's not at all according to it, there is a general crab and so on. because those documents do not say anything about your channel dnipro, channel five, or any other channel, it only says that there should be broadcasting, a single, single broadcasting, yes we are talking about this one, but let's say yes, well, there is no list of all the snakes there, which are good or bad, and so on. that is, this is a political decision, and well, we have already talked about it, many

experts, an expert environment that monitors the situation in the media field, they criticized it decision because by this time we have understood what the real reasons for this step are, that is, there is no explanation and no one is to blame for us. what in general why is this it happened like this. that is, this is also a bad story, which is not good, which adds to this piggy bank of all the problems that we have in the media field today , it adds this minus to us, and here today we have to think very carefully about how we will get out of this, because if we want to integrate into the european union and we want to be with the civilized world and not vice versa with those who are now fighting against us and killing our people , then we should think about freedom of speech and pluralism of our media landscape, this is

very important for our future and here is a lot, this is a serious story, yes. well, because the assessment of the press in a democratic country that is waging war with a powerful enemy, as it is partly free , it is serious. we were an ideal country in the conditions of the war, we still could not have the level of freedom of speech at that level. well, at that level. sorry for the tautology. how was it before, before the war, before the introduction of martial law, this is an objective reality, and here if with we need her, we need her it is necessary to accept it and understand how we then we will come out of it. when martial law is lifted, this is an important moment. that is, it is important for us not to miss that moment so that

this reality does not continue in us after the end of martial law. this is very important, and that is why today we have to talk about it well, including on the airwaves there as part of expert-level conference discussions with the government , talk about these things openly, including , for example, about excessive because before the full-scale invasion, we were building a media field that should be free from the influence of the state, and we passed the law on denationalization, etc. and so on. now we see that the state is increasing budgets for media financing. well, we somehow understand that this is in war conditions yes, the market is bad. well, they see the only marathon

as the only opportunity to broadcast it to the society. yes, your messages, although the issue is debatable. i would, for example, do better. the marathon performed a very good function at the beginning of the full-scale registration-invasion, and now we need to review the approaches to this, we have a public broadcaster after all, and he could quite calmly and perfectly perform the function of informing society in war conditions. that is, i do not understand why in this story now and to budget it, well, if private broadcasters were to budget , uh, within the framework in which you are now. after the full-scale invasion, they stopped measuring the audience

, and this is a big problem, i don’t know how the situation is now, whether this television panel will be restored , but i have not yet seen the results of these measurements, and i myself would be interested because this is a very important point, that is, if we invest some big money, we must understand and what is the output for which audience then this one goes ? surveys, they give a certain growth, they will not give you indicators on a specific channel, they are accurate, yes, they give a section of the population's mood , the trends are certain, but if we want to see the ratings, we need to restore these measurements again, and i haven't yet, well, i haven't seen them in public access, well, ma'am diana if we talk about the observance of journalistic standards now by the ukrainian media, what are your conclusions as of today, here

, somewhere, we do not comply. it depends on the media, it depends on specific journalists, on their level and professional experience, and in the end some kind of moral framework that every individual journalist has because every day there are many different situations to show or not to show a death on the air to show some cruelties or not to show debatable questions about investigations when they are appropriate how we conduct them so or what is it, or is it not there on the one hand, because there were um, well, such attempts to say that, for example , the investigation today can be regarded as a company against someone eh, that is, these discussions are ongoing, but eh, we have to talk about them and we have to speak openly about it and this distinguishes us from our neighbor who has already finally

killed any free thought, free speech in our country and we have to value and preserve it because a lot of people are dying for it today in our country thank you mrs. diana diana dutsyk, executive director of the ukrainian institute of media and communication, a member of the ukrainian commission on journalistic ethics, the story is actually extremely serious. yes, we understand that during the war, military censorship is a normal phenomenon, but the question of its limits, so to speak, we understand that there is expediency which was also described by the general staff of the ministry of defense, in particular, it is about the taboo on the specification of the movement of our troops , our units, and so on. well, i don’t even know how we’ll end this broadcast . well, what’s the collection, the collection of khrystina, yes

. come on, let’s now collect a couple of hryvnias, or maybe a couple of tens of hryvnias, or maybe a couple of tens of thousands of hryvnias, in particular, it’s about a collection for of our defenders, the company named after roman has not been extinguished as a part of the 251st battalion of the 241st brigade. therefore, the soldiers really need cars to perform combat missions. unfortunately, in such conditions of constant hostilities, cars do not live long and can move. well, it is necessary and without them, well, it is simply impossible for the units to function normally cars are urgently needed, one of them thanks to you. dear tv viewers , espresso has already been bought, but the collection is ongoing. our goal is uah 500,000. the details you see on the screen are the privatbank card of the monobank and

, accordingly, there should be a qr-code. with the help of your beautiful smartphone, you will be able to overcome and transfer some money, in fact, the dynamics are very positive , we have collected a lot of money with joint efforts, here we are now khrystyna yanskyi , the enemy is coming cleanly at six o'clock. 100 uah maybe less maybe more but do it like this people become volunteers and join our espresso community that supports similar initiatives you should support those who take care of you dear tv viewers well, for today , we have a christening, that's probably all . antin vorkovskyi continues the broadcast. today is