[000:00:00;00] this motivates tankers on the battlefield are not alone, therefore, without coordination and cooperation, there is no such thing as air reconnaissance, this is also infantry, and these are ordinary scouts, this is artillery. well, i don’t know, for sure there was not a single outing where we worked on our own, and it is also impossible to clearly say when the infantry they press very hard they need help they are very happy when we arrive when we have already been repulsed here they are not happy about our presence because then they start hunting for us and they are flying glory to ukraine now we are persuading schumacher to he took it and he was pampered, he says he was not very good. trophy equipment is a separate pride to climb under the nose into a hand-held combat

vehicle, it requires both risk and shakiness . well, there are three tanks that were directly pulled together with the boys. one of these tanks. well, just so you understand, there is the enemy's defense line, there are his mortar units on the side. a little but closer to us. and i don't know why this tank stalled. they dragged it on cables and didn't reach it literally some 500 m to their advanced positions and threw them. maybe they thought that no one would climb there anymore. i don't know. i don't know what they were thinking before we pulled him out of there. it was a big surprise for them. in march, sergiya's company destroyed bmp tanks and up to 20 enemy soldiers when asked . about the awards, the commander answers discreetly, such great ones, this order will be in khmelnytskyi of the third degree and a gold star

, i n- and at the moment i am not quite aware of all this because, well, it was not something like that , it is. did not invent a cure for raku, well, this is an ordinary job that you will do on a daily basis. this is what all the guys around me do. they are serhii, the father of three children. separation from his family is a test for him, but he says that the family supports him even at a distance . it's such a cool fact. it was probably the best possible feeling, the best possible feeling that a father could hear when my daughter told me at the age of 17 , dad. well, it’s covered, what can you? oh, there are very thin tears, i

’m holding back a lot even now. flow wouldn't do anything no, but why is this normal, ordinary emotions , it's not about weakness, but don't be very scared , this is such a funnel, the hero of ukraine sincerely speaks about fear and regret and anger, i'm sure the war changed every ukrainian a lot, i have a slightly different fear well, first of all, you worry about yourself because i know that if something happens to you , there are still those people behind you for whom you are responsible. itself and a very big fear probably he is bigger than even in his life, he will make mistakes and plan something, well, when planning something, they will not think of something

, they will not foresee and let those who believed in you down , now this is motivation, also motivation, unfortunately well , it is burning, for sure, weakness, i remember in oh , now it will be so affected in the 15th year, in avdiivka, they held a re-commendation with their scouts . but i watched the bmpeshkas and the painting. a mother and her two daughters , about four years old, probably went most of all to get water. my mother brought 4 eggplants and these children

did not need a 5-liter eggplant. and they saw how we drove by in a truck with a flag and left these bottles and ran there with our hands reaching out to the military in a city, in a settlement that was almost completely not destroyed . it sees everything and worries. well, why does it have to pay for the mistakes of its parents or grandfathers and grandmothers, and for whom it makes no difference if we are still brothers or gives for 200 uah, i will wave a flag. i don't care what flag they wave, but today i have 200 uah gave and no one at this moment thinks that sooner or later these 200 hryvnias will come to you. well, you or your children. well, it's good if you, because you made your own choice, the child for what? well , here it is for sure if we're talking about i'm

very sorry for the children who pay for the mistakes of their parents, they will destroy themselves, they cannot win without war, and here they will definitely not succeed, and they pour their human aggression somewhere, they need themselves , so they will fall apart, there will be no such country, i may be wrong in the terms but i will not be mistaken, as a result there will never be such a country as russia currently is, it is just a matter of time and when it disintegrates, then we can say that it is over. if now, god forbid, under any pretext, we will be drawn to the negotiations, positions at the negotiating table and forced to sign peace, this will be the end of the war, this will be a postponement of the war, i am very afraid of this, i do not want to pass on the war as an inheritance, about happiness sergey is also

ready to talk about things that cannot be put off until later, you overestimated yes, and some happiness is in small things, well, the main thing is that the family is in a normal state when everyone is there. well, when the family is happy, let's say so. brush your teeth there or wash normally and you later and if she is also warm then this is generally the peak of happiness and what about dreams serhiy also has an answer this is a very deep question and i dream of a cool

country so that one day children will be proud of the fact that they live in it is quite difficult for this country i have often said this. well, how do we communicate with friends that our war is not now, our war will end after victory in this war , we have already won, it is definitely just a matter of time. but it will be one hundred percent, then there will be a war with the subconscious mind . well , we need to break away from muscovy. the whole normal civilized world is moving in this direction and this war will be fought at the level of consciousness, it is no longer about tanks, it is not about weapons, it is about culture, it is about development , we will keep it well, it will be ukraine marichka gold filip gavrylyuk details tv channel inter

marathon the only news with the enemy do not agree on what to destroy protect their own people who do not hide behind their backs who listen to the call of the heart and are the first to go into battle people of great strength people of indomitable spirit people of goodwill glory to ukrainian volunteers

they are light they are humanity they are wisdom but courage, strength and indomitability - these are also ukrainian women who protect, help, teach, treat, work and become an example for the whole world. they have forgotten about sleep and almost do not leave the operating room for a year. most are on artificial lung ventilation devices, 20,000 operations since the beginning of the war and 90% of the saved lives of the military are what was removed from the brain and we saved lives and the medical rear works even under shelling among them were not turned on and there were explosions when we were working in the operating room and you cannot leave the patient

and go to the bomb shelter exclusively the public film crew watched directly in the operating room how lives were saved see more in marathon the only news today at 23:00 we ukrainians and our partners believe in the victory of ukraine in the war, but what is victory for us , the exit to the borders of the 91st year, the capitulation of the russian federation, and if the ancient principle of victory, carthage must be destroyed, the collapse of russia, is this possible

scenario, is it necessary for us and is it acceptable for the west or even the world, this is a rubric , accent , my name is oleksiy fadeev, and accent. with guests in the studio, this is first volodymyr fesenko political expert ilya ponomaryov a-a russian oppositionist good evening gentlemen good afternoon a-a so , gentlemen, first of all, the question mr. volodymyr is probably for you yes for dispersal what what is the name of what you see as the victory of ukraine? well, apart from crossing the border in 1991, this is an official goal supported by the majority of ukrainians. i think that we really want to avoid a repeat of the war. and this is a risk that will exist. war and new aggression on the part of the russian authorities, especially if there remains, if not putin himself, then the putin regime even without putin. we need internal changes in russia, indeed, many in ukraine believe that

the best option is the collapse and division of russia , but we have to evaluate at the moment e- is this let's say this is not the most likely option. i would say, taking into account the position of both the west and china, that it is important for us that this will also be a condition for victory, that the de-internalization of russia takes place even there, in discussions with some colleagues from europe, we found the right formula, that the decentralization of russia should take place. this is what suits ukraine and i think the russian opposition as well, but the main thing is that russia does not advocate decentralization, where is the implementation of inter? yes, you agree with the fact that certain changes should take place in russia also, would you agree with the statement if i told you that the disintegration of russia is a necessary condition for the victory of ukraine, necessary, no, i would not agree with this a-a

is this likely to be true? 20% that is, there are certain regions that can actually secede and where the probability is high er, this is chechnya, it can be what it can be there, you , the far east , mmm. the other, that is there is no such benefit in separating from e-e , and that is why i believe that in general well, even if all the national republics are separated, this is 20% of the population of the russian federation, that is, the predominant character of russia will be preserved, and therefore the only thing i would not agree with there is decentralization it is necessary, but the main thing is where the imperialization is so that the empire no longer exists, because the empire itself

threatens the neighbors and it must be neutralized . decentralization, de-internalization, decentralization, can there be such a thing that russia itself is modern russia, it is built in such a way, it cannot exist decentralized, and this will lead to become the first trigger, as they say now, and lead to some kind of chain reaction, and this may eventually lead to the apparatus of sovereignties disintegration and so on. well, again , i think that no, because there must be a seed of these separatist attitudes. and now we see there are probably very small movements in the various national republics of russia, but even in siberia, well, there is very, very little pressure from the point of view

of the population there, and the main thing here is the position of the elites, and if the elites are interested, they are separated, because when the soviet union collapsed, that was the attitude of the elites, even in ukraine what was the main thing there, the position of the movement or the position of kravchuk, yes, yes, the former communists, absolutely, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, but inside russia, i just don’t see such things right now, that is, in the example of ukraine, you want to say that when the elites see for themselves the opportunity to be elites of an independent e-e formation of a certain let's say the formation of e-e entity of some kind so then this impulse is true likewise that is, at what price , for example, summer is enough there, so wealthy and independent by itself, there are enough natural resources there that they can use, that is

the elites of yakutia, moreover, in chechnya and another situation because they fought there and the population longs for it. and in other regions, there is no such thing. tatarstan well, it is located inside the russian federation , that is, if he has the opportunity to get there may be borders with someone else, then they will start thinking about it, but now they will try on the contrary to strengthen their influence inside the russian federation. they don’t even video kremlin, gentlemen. i would like to tell you that we have now listened to you and in principle it can be agreed, but yes one cannot disagree with those people who consider, if not expedient

, then at least plausible, such a phenomenon as the collapse of russia. the editor has a very interesting plot on this topic. and please, let’s watch it now, admit it, you too imagined how it would fall apart . yes, the question is very easy, how much part and how long it can be occupied. this is due to many reasons, for which we will try to analyze them and calculate the scenario of the possible collapse of the russian federation in the last 20 let's see when raskol rossiyu show russia is a post-impressionism that still has imperial convulsions, but there is no longer imperial power, there is no imperial future , and there is no future of the empire in general, this has been repeatedly demonstrated to us by history they fall apart and it happens in completely different ways very quickly suddenly and on the contrary slowly due to the advice of sovereignties and constant wars for influence, often the former center of the empire tries to return all the lands, like moscow now, but the ref is the atavism of the empire

, as if not to fall apart. but there are risks. i don’t i don't even know if such an ethnicity as russians will be able to be preserved. the people, well, there will be moskaids, some urals, and so on. well , that was all in the plans. the criminal activity is everywhere. and of course, it is preparing the collapse of russia. the crimean deputy recognized that the downfall of the russian federation is quite likely. if the so-called so-called svo is to prove to the end what putin said. this is really his fear, the only thing that he did not say about him before was that it is called "no to eternal trouble," but now he is saying it in order to mobilize all russians, because they say that the homeland is in danger . but is it possible putin's phobia is in the ground, can the russian federation collapse, he did everything in the last 20 years so that the split of russia would not happen, eh, i'm trying to consolidate it. well, most likely, the collapse will begin precisely with a little atlas in such people as, uh, residents

of the north caucasus and where are the ingush, this daghestanci? who fought and not only chechens who fought for independence islam belakiev, the spokesman of the volunteer chechen battalion, now his brothers are defending our state in the east , we will talk about the homeland of islam and ichkeria a little later, and now dagestan. yes, there was also a war there in 1999 to regulate the conflict, even putin flew in, although he was the prime minister then, but the visit was actually his election campaign, you know what i want to say that there is a real struggle for

the russian state and we have a small choice. we need to achieve a positive result. this is the result that putin talked about. the second russian-chechen war or the first ended in the defeat of russia . there is a lot of blood of peaceful people . the second war was completed, putin won with his wallet, now chechnya is being acquired at the expense of moscow, so is the region's autonomy possible while kadyrov is in power, he can't say everything, i was with russia, now i understand that russia is an enemy , let's fight for independence again, he can't say that - and because there is too much treachery

, there is too much blood on his hands , he personally drowned people, he personally robbed people, he killed at the same time. big деньги ето точно программыно более проблемы другие регионы, and how long will you all be in the first textbook? dagestan and siberia are a separate state, e.e., dagestan is a separate state . the state of ichkeria is a separate state. yakutia is a separate state and muscovy is a separate state. agrarian means a formation that will be under the influence of turkey, but can be sufficient and independent, uh, then we see tatarstan , an ideal history, its own money, its own identity, its own different religion, easily, and will these regions be able to be absolutely the same

stable in this, there are probably all the answers here. here it is, the already famous map of budanov, on it there is a part of the independent regions and lands that will belong to other states in the future. this is china. smoking will happen again in japan . kaliningrad will return to germany. this is not something that we prepared for this. what they have proven themselves, but this is actually their future and what's more, they know about it. everyone understands that this future is real and it will be officially divided or unofficially just under the influence, you can divide by four, you can give turkey, but not the nuclear parts of the caucasus, there are no nuclear warheads in the chinese american european direction, and to those three under the nuclear guarantees of their countries, give these parts as fun for management, it is possible, possible, and one more option is a civil war with private armies after the bloody participation in the war of the pvk wagner thought about the creation of his armed forces in different regions of russia, the regions will be independent after all, there are no separate

regions, but simply on the territory of russia there will be a large number of them, according to the sounds of the case the bank of such honest armies, at the same time, the country will put its own de facto unit, will partial sovereignty pay , are all these processes possible in the russian federation, for example, tomorrow , no, but the attack on ukraine for russia was a fatal step and the first on the way to disintegration bohdan verbytskyi serhii kilimnyk and oleg nevydmskyi, details of the intermarathon tv channel, the only news , and in a new way, we also looked at a whole series of opinions about the possible publicity of russia, and some of these, uh, from those speakers who we saw in the story so evoke the ukrainian society, to put it mildly, if it is not just a top-level cognition, for example, kyrylo budanov, and in connection with this, i have a question, but before the story, you and i talked about some, well , let's say obvious pragmatic reasons or

, uh, there are reasons for the breakup to russia, please tell me the arguments that were given in the plots in the plot, do they seem to you to be sufficient for repeating the finale again in the long run to lead to some kind of such a change of disintegration see eh well, first of all, you yourself you say in the long term, long term, they say that it will happen immediately, it can be different, but you need to understand one simple thing, if we are talking about the scenario of the collapse of russia, yes and most likely, there can only be a partial collapse, but i consider this scenario more likely than the alternative so let's say yes to the pieces of the separation so far , everyone is serious - i emphasize that all serious experts who deal with russia in particular believe that the scenario of a complete disintegration is extremely unlikely, even a partial disintegration can happen in the

event that the maximum well a deep and large-scale internal political crisis in russia, this is the first main prerequisite, it will not happen automatically, just like that, they even mentioned dagestan, even chechnya was mentioned, chechnya is fattening now, they are simply receiving tribute from the putin regime . yes, we were taken there involuntarily and we will not leave voluntarily. yes, they also get certain connections there, and there, well, dagestan is also a multi-ethnic entity there, there is no single, single entity there, internal a contradiction in tatarstan, i agree, one of the few subjects that really has its own elite identity is self-sufficient. why am i talking about this because in the absolute majority of subjects of the russian federation, absolutely 90% of the subjects of the russian federation are now governed by

variandi, absolutely 90% of varangians appointed by putin who have nothing to do with local elites, the elites also have economic dependence on the central budget, but if a chain reaction of an internal political crisis begins , in particular, a war of all against all. then, yes , local elites will be forced to think about survival by one's own forces, but what could be the map of the future of russia? i think it is impossible to predict now, that's why i say that i believe more in this scenario of decentralization, because it will be beneficial to the big players , because it is a complicated process further inside russia , the same tatarstan itself will be beneficial for them to become a part of the russian federation , but to be like kazakhstan, for example, to have control over their own resources, to control them, to preserve and develop their own identity inside, i think even in russia

federations. and it will be more like a confederation, and this is why the day of realization can only happen on a personal basis, even if in 30 years of existence , it has suffered a lot. in one way or another, they need to be implemented, first of all, for a military victory of ukraine - this is the first condition , and secondly, for the internal tectonic processes inside russia itself to begin, uh. will be, then we will have to prepare for a long-term confrontation with the russian authorities. i am a supporter of the fact that, you know, it is not to play in attractive fantasies, utopias, or in such maps, but to prepare for various scenarios to cooperate with the russian opposition. because

i think that the common interest we have is the transformation of the the gradual democratization of russia, decentralization, and so on, yes, because then yes, and the risk of war, if at least it will be less, and maybe it will disappear altogether , but just think, it will all collapse, it will not automatically happen, and that is why we are better off to engage in more realistic scenarios of our influence on the internal situation in russia. yes, it is clear, panel, eh , i hope you understand what these if fantasies are, and conventionally speaking, they are actually dictated, they have reasons behind them . now it is angry and this is what we want , but it is not a fact that it is right because there are pragmatic, absolutely and practical ways to do it. please

tell me if you have a vision for the future of russia. at the same time, i didn't just say the russia of the future is so beautiful. for uh, one that would not pose a threat to ukraine, in particular, to its neighbors , and in particular to ukraine, what it could be without collapsing as you say or transforming, well, first of all, i want to say that you should not be afraid of your desires and you have to be guided like this, you have to be guided by emotions and emotions, and now i think that ukrainian society is, of course, because of the war, because of the losses, because of all these horrors that we observe every day, of course, the majority is guided by these emotions, but we need you it is necessary to think about what will happen in the end from the point of view of benefit for ukraine, and what will be necessary