[000:00:00;00] not to pull up the armored vehicles, trying to develop their success, where they seized uh, zabahmutka, there is a district of squares, and it is such a big bridgehead for them, but there uh, what do they lose? they pull up and that's why they become prey, but they pull tanks, they pull self-propelled vehicles right along the back roads between these collapsed houses and these streets, there is a central medicine tank, where they took pictures, if you remember, this is the central street that passes through they they try to pull up, but their tanks are on fire there, and then they throw them. well, they can't to the extent that they would like to throw them at the pincers and through the berry bushes

and the borkovka. there are so many differences that if you don't know this area, then you fall into a trap and while they are there, we pull each other out, we simply cover them in the squares, that's why they try to use their tanks, self-propelled artillery installations, the only thing they manage to survive is their mobile groups who move around like 10-12 small people well, if you can call these two-legged people and they try to combine their points where they attack in this way, that's why the map doesn't always correspond, you're right there , you painted it all red or it's dark there - it's burgundy at the moment. yes, but our guys are going to counteroffensive, we surround them with mini-cauldrons and we have to wait for the map to move, where we knocked out one or another area

, because it's going behind the streets, behind the streets, not in the very center of the city. they're trying to get there move forward no matter what you want there, you know they are the propaganda heads there and simonyan and others there, they counted the meters there, they have already turned there we are watching this picture of the map, so nothing has moved, the people where they are succeeding is right here in the southeast, but you see these arrows. this is what i am saying, we are counterattacking and repelling them, and all together it is already under our control with and everyone is moving together to where their red zone was. that's why everything is going according to plan, i'll tell you, and they are now there's another one walking around like this, already a meme if you've seen this. it's the pure truth and they confirmed it, by the way, that is, i, at first

, we thought that it could be old people do you remember the overturning of the t-54 and t-55 there? well, we thought it was a joke , but no, they confirm that this is exactly how this equipment will go to the front seriously . that's how you know how to take stumps well that's it these tanks were the next ones on the pedestals, well, they don’t deny that they picked them up , so it’s not in my opinion, they weren’t in the primorsky krai. i would like to remind the viewers that petro voloshchenko, a serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine with the callsign stone, was on the air on espresso channels, and then

about the artillery, because the athletes are actually the gods of war, they perform 90 tasks on the battlefield, destroying enemy targets when we we are talking about important goals and now we are joined by a serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine and public figure artem romanyukov, i am glad to see and hear from you. good afternoon, your service is now closely connected with the artillery, we do not name the brigade where you serve, but literally the day before yesterday, there was a briefing the head of the combat strike systems department of the general staff, colonel serhiy baranov , if you watched him there, he says that if we are to bring victory closer, we must constantly adapt, constantly improve, look for new forms, ways

the use of artillery, new weapons, new ammunition, new approaches, and against this background, i would like to hear from you on the example of your own experience, on the example of your unit, what new approaches are introduced in order for artillery to be the most effective way to impress the enemy. well , first of all, we as people who support artillery , that is they provide it with targets for destruction, artillery scouts, and for us, the main weapon is er, well, reconnaissance weapons, that is , drones, er, drones, again , drones, and speaking of new approaches here that is, under the action of fish, in a certain way, well, over time, it becomes more and more difficult to perform tasks, that is why our line and the development of adaptation, it is very strongly aimed at ensuring that our boards

work normally under the influence of the russian federation for of this, i would emphasize on the simplification of the take-off and landing mechanisms of drones , what i am talking about if we are talking about some complex system there, for example, with a vertical take-off or a system that should go into automatic mode, including there on some you see the construction of slings and so on. usually it requires the use of clear positioning, well, gps is what we in civilian life call so in conditions when you perform tasks on the contact line or somewhere in a 10-20 kilometer zone, often it is simply, well, it is a luxury to have enough the number of signals from satellites and clear positioning, therefore, ah, well, i would look in the direction of the independence of the system, takeoff, landing, from eh, from satellite navigation, in particular

, for example, the russians. i don’t know whether it was on purpose or they were just lucky. they are right from the first days of this invasion and even before a-a they act according to this principle of taking off from a compact a-a very simple catapult e-e what is there, well, at least some kind of complex electronic equipment, plus it is easy to disguise, easy to deploy somewhere simply next to the landing and the second is landing by parachute, which is also a very simple and reliable method, which, again, does not depend on any interference radiation and so on, you can always bring the drone to the landing point in manual mode side in my opinion is necessary look what concerns unmanned aviation well, what about other reconnaissance methods for artillery such

as counter battery radars, sound-meets complexes, then i think that we need to emphasize that we should be provided with this equipment, because at the moment i do not think that we are capable of producing such complexes in ukraine therefore here to the usa to sweden and so on and so on, mr. artem, it looks like you have a technical education major, a higher technical education with a major in information management systems and technologies, and that means that in fact, you can appreciate the importance of information from the point of view that the means of detecting and identifying targets should be as short as possible, but you also come across samples of weapons that our partners provide us there, in particular, there are polish howitzers, crabs, which have their own system, there are anchors, french howitzers, which of these systems are the most optimal from the point of view of reducing the cycle of combat management

and what experience we need to spread relying on samples of foreign systems, you know , it seems to me in this regard, we are a little passed that period of the 2000s, maybe 2010s, when everyone tried to develop some magical e-e box and which must be connected with a bunch of wires in order to ensure the connection between the means of defeat and the means of intelligence, the whole indication and e and that all this is automatically transmitted to well, for a cannon or a howitzer and so on, and in the conditions when everything is silenced, everything is very different, and what is transmitted to us, well, they have repeatedly joked that we have a zoo of various means that are extremely difficult to connect with each other and in

under the conditions of today's total informatization, which we have, i mean smartphones, scarlinky, er, the availability of the network as such , it seems to me that we have already found our way , which way to go, it is protected, protected, just correspondence, it works very quickly, it helps very well on the battlefield and i mean that if i found something, the shortest way for me as a scout is just to send these coordinates in some kind of secure messenger and that's all ah-ah maybe it sounds like well for someone eh maybe even like some disappointment. i don't know, but this is my opinion, it is subjective. but it seems to me that we are in this direction now, without complicating it and what can be done in the conditions when we are already in a full-scale war, this is the best thing that is needed, this is constant communication

, constant internet or well, any other connection uh and fast transfer in any form, whether it's a photo of the screen or uh, some coordinates or it's just that even there i don't know a screenshot from the map uh well, that gives my results i see it with my own eyes and uh, i like how it is arranged here and how short is this key chain and the chain of defeat because of this? hmm, here it also adds its er. and the absence of excessive bureaucratization of this process, which is also necessary to give proper management at least in those areas where i had to work, i don’t have to er to get there where are some generals in order to get permission to hit a target, these are very horizontal connections

, literally, between artillery calculations and intelligence calculations, and how much does it take, by the way, minimal with the help of a drone and the impression of this target is that this chain is so short, it can be a minute, it can be seconds, it all depends, well, here, of course, the factor of whether the weapon is ready to attack if you are already going to work or flying to work according to which in advance let's say so uh, you have scouted uh, targets that need to be scouted and then you already prepare a means of defeat in advance that is just right for him and is ready to work for you , if you don't have this, then well, it's a few minutes uh

, maybe sometimes there are dozens minutes for that to be ready and harvest these and you mentioned how critical our dependence on this service is now because there were different nuances during this period of time and were there periods when sterling did not work as properly as it should work with starlinks well, there is always something going on uh around them uh um let's say instability but it is not connected with some kind of desire to make things worse. it's just civil after all , and civilian equipment and for example there a change in the tariff is banal ah from the system may result to the point that you will temporarily lose connection there, because just a soldier who uses it, you don't know that you have to go into the office there and switch to another tariff

, because this tariff no longer allows him to work there in that area, for example, where is he is located and such things are happening with them in terms of criticality in dependence er, well, look at ours, in principle, and the characteristic of both ukrainians and the ukrainian army er is that we are very well able to adapt and survive. so now terlink er for many is simply irreplaceable the tool helps a lot, but if they are not there, well, there are a lot of options for how to replace it. this is in order to at least have some kind of minimal access or even normal ones, that is, i think that um, we will learn even if, god forbid something will happen to this network and it will become unavailable to us, then there will be options

to get out of the situation, but now it really provides a lot, a lot of communication is provided by the stalins, this is not a secret , literally all colleagues can confirm and confirm this publicly wanted i would like to ask you one more detail, there was such a good big publication by the washington post, which talked about the american palantir system, which is also used in ukraine , that is, the ability to receive data about targets using satellites actually on the tablets of commanders on the battlefield. have you ever come across this program or does it really exist? so effective was it somewhere outside of your part, unfortunately, i didn’t come across exactly with the volunteer, i didn’t work, but i also repeat what i started

with today i well, i can imagine what will be connected so that, for example, such a system will start working on my tablet. i think that i will have to spend some time installing some software and so on. and so on. and the most important thing is that i will be able to share this information with my colleague, the commander on in another direction, or with the sergeants or with the commander of some artillery station, will i be able to share this information with him as quickly as i receive it, or will i have to take a picture of the screen again and send him a message if i have to again? take a picture of the screen if for me er, well, in a certain sense, not that completely, but in a certain sense, the meaning of setting up some complex data exchange systems disappears, this makes sense from the point of view of information security, in any case, yes

, er, i am absolutely ready with this agree, but let's say so until there is some kind of information exchange system in the tablet of every calculation on the battlefield for which it may be needed, and i will not consider such a system to be fully effective p topic thank you for your professional explanations for your service for i will remind you that the espresso channel was aired by artem romanyukov, a serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine and a public figure , and then we have mykola salamakha, retired lieutenant colonel, project manager of the domestic defense and industrial company of energy 2000, a man with tremendous experience in the development of armored vehicles and mr. mykola's weapons, i congratulate you. good day

. i would like to ask you about the component that actually caused hysteria in russia when it comes to the supply of not only challenger tanks to ukraine, but also ammunition for these tanks from of depleted uranium actually means that we are getting a weapon system that significantly exceeds the capabilities of russian tanks on the battlefield. please explain what is the special feature of these uranium-core ammunition, what is their advantage ? by about 10-15%. well, in principle , there are no armed targets on the battlefield now

that are capable of resisting such projectiles as 105 mm, 125 mm , 120 mm, and such projectiles were developed in the soviet union and in great britain and in the united states of america and they are also produced in russia and in the soviet union they were produced in the u.k. they are being corrected in great britain they are produced in the united states of america now already in china and even in pakistan well then if russia raises such a fuss how can it be explained that in fact it is unable to master this technology to the end or is simply using any political such component to raise a new hype around this supply and

again talk about the nuclear topic as you can to explain, first of all, this is precisely the hype and an attempt to pull the nuclear theme into the war in ukraine, it must be said that russia currently has lead-2 projectiles in service, of which about 2,000 units were released, about half of which were used during the research a-a and another 1,000 units are not enough, such shells are used by russia on the territory of ukraine, and we have several such shells as trophies . and some t-72 b3 tanks that came to us as trophies were not only with such projectiles, and for this projectile specially developed cassettes for the t-72 b3 tank and in these tanks two cassettes with a total number of 22

vikasets and cassettes were replaced directly for this use for the target purpose for the bm-48 lead 2 projectile, mr. mykola, what is happening now in general in russia with the restoration of the tank fleet we know that in ukraine they have lost more than 3.5 thousand main battle tanks, now they are trying to develop different options for restoration, what are the quantitative indicators of possible restoration and how to explain the appearance of these tanks t-54 t-55 about which have already been discussed quite actively in such an expert environment in russia for two days now, there are several ways to restore armored vehicles , the first way is to remove from storage what they have, it ’s just the t-54 t-50 t-62m, that’s the t-80b

and t-72a vt-72 well, but those machines have been in our storage for 30 years or more, and they need to be restored, they can be restored at armored tank repair plants. in russia , who deal directly with tanks, that is no more than 800 machines in total, and there are two more omsk-transmash plants that are also capable of rebuilding. oh, and the ural wagon factory . but again, omtransmash is also engaged in the creation of various special machines, that is , engineering machines on a tank. that is, we understand that the total number at most, it is no more than a thousand vehicles

per year, the enemy loses more than he is able to put in order, therefore the prospects of the enemy in terms of tanks are really very sad, and they so fleetingly mentioned these t-54 t55 tanks to what extent should this be taken seriously, especially from the point of view of the fact that where this 100 mm programmer is, it is not known whether there are ammunition for this tank, please explain what they might be in general. well, the features of this machine, should it be taken seriously on the battlefield? even during the times of the soviet union, these machines were used already in the last period, that is, in the last 20 years, that is, in the 80s, in the 90s, as stationary firing points in fortified areas

on the chinese border, and also these machines were sold en masse to africa and i everything. yes, i think that those cars that lit up on the echelons, uh, they were taken out of storage and sent to some enterprises so that they were renewed and sent according to some contracts that got out somewhere for the russians in africa for the country that is not able to purchase something newer and has trained personnel for these machines because if the russians decided to use these machines themselves , they are dangerous for use with the magpie projectile for more than years , but the mobility of these machines is terrible and their reliability is absolutely non-existent, that is, there is no guarantee that this the car will not break down after 10 or 100 km and after that it will not be subject to restoration by anyone, it is not guaranteed by anyone, it is so er. such

a perspective. well, again , crew training, you understand to return to er of a tank e-e corrections to the movement of an enemy tank or to the movement of an enemy body the value of the most profitable correction e-e to a bucket central aiming mark or central point to come e-e decides e-e aiming point to take away do the same there are no fire control systems i.e. all this is from the time of the t-34, and this must be taught. and to teach it, you need to spend months , and the most important thing is to find those specialists who remember all those things. they are over 70 years old, so you can say that the extreme version is there

russia will use the t-62m against the tank because it will be even more difficult to restore and modernize them. yes, but by the way, the t-62m too, yesterday was such a strange statement by medvedev, or the day before yesterday, and he said that the t-62m tank was superior to the western models of the abrams leopard and e- e any western versions of tanks is that it is 2m as far as he showed himself on the battlefield because it seems that we have already destroyed a significant number of these tanks there but in any case here what is happening with this tank means it all starts with the fact that the russians claim that they were about 2,000 tanks in storage, but of the two thousand tanks that they were supposed to restore, they were able to restore them even when the war was going on in syria, and only 300 machines were sent to syria in the year that passed, they promised to restore about

800 machines there but probably more than 200 were restored of units that entered the territory of ukraine, and exactly half of them have already ceased to exist as combat units, that is, due to breakdowns , that is, because some of them came to us as trophies and some were destroyed. machines and the 103rd armored tank repair plant took another chief officer in sunny transbaikalia. so, its capacity per year is 200 machines, that ’s the maximum, not only that, but it also has loads of the same brdms, the second, and infantry fighting vehicles , the first, but in order to capitalize to repair cars, and you need to have the entire elemental base for replacing the weapons stabilizer or for major repairs

, here is the same elemental base that was developed 50 years ago and its production was 30-40 years ago lost. that is, it is an opportunity for exhibits we understand that russia is moving along its dead-end path, on the other hand, we are expecting the arrival of a significant number of western tanks, these are abramsiliopard challengers, and there was another interesting statement by the head of the rentmetal plant, if you remember who stated that this company is considering the possibility of building a new panther tank with a 130 mm gun from a tank factory in ukraine. how do you feel about such proposals? is this way optimal? what should we do with updating our own tank

fleet? it means a very painful topic first, i'll try the first half of the question, the statement of one of the heads of rinmetal was made in a few episodes, the first episode was really the one we plan to expand and so on . after that, a few days later , another statement was made, which was already changed tone and it was said that we are ready to rent the enterprise that will be built in ukraine in the mykolaiv region , unfortunately, just one minute, try to agree with the evaluation of the german proposals in one minute, i think that the realities are such that in order to start the construction of the plant, it will take 2-3 years and bring it to serial production of a new machine is another 5 to 5 years, that is, the realities are such that we will definitely not produce such a machine in ukraine . well, the prospects of ukrainian tank construction

will be clear after the end of the war after of our victory p. mykola thank you for these professional explanations and i would like to remind our viewers that mykola salamakha, a retired lieutenant colonel of project management at the national defense and industrial company energy 2000, was on the air of the espresso channel. so, against the background of conversations with our military and experts, we can clearly conclude that in addition to courage, skill of our military, we need new weapons and new technologies, in fact, this is the path that guarantees us victory over the enemy in a short period of time, serhiy zgurets was with you. and its chronicles of the information war. greetings to serhii, we