[000:00:00;00] india has already surpassed china by 1.4 billion people. imagine that the current third of the population is indians and chinese, of course europe understands that it is these countries that must be worked with, mr. igor, well , look, henry kissinger wrote a book in it once upon a time. said that now everything that is happening in the world is a game of chess and he called these events the great chessboard, but looking at what putin and siedenpin are doing, it seems to me that they are trying to transplant the world from this chessboard at the solitaire table, where one person is sitting, laying out the cards in front of her, and here she is playing with herself. you don't think that this is the case. and if it is, then what can it lead to, mr. lawyers

? yes, but definitely. you know, this is a geopolitical game, that is, china is trying to show that china, in general, is the main target audience for this chinese rhetoric. it is not even the west. and this is the global south, latin america, africa , asia, and they understand that these countries do not trust the west for historical reasons there. post-traumatic injuries are many other things, and therefore china understands that it can be the main trading partner, it is already essentially for all countries and the same without a drinking partner, china has to work, and instead, uh, western influence in africa, well, in terms of security there and defense it is not visible enough, and that is why even here, with the russian-ukrainian war, which definitely affects our global

food security, when we cannot normally export goods around the world , including to the countries of africa , this war must also have a global dimension therefore, for its settlement and for its completion of our victory, it is necessary to involve all partners, in principle, that peaceful, well, conditional, yes , that is, the position of the prc regarding the so-called ukrainian crisis, as they call it. other points. but there is a clause regarding the fact that it is worth abandoning unilateral sanctions, of course, it is about western sanctions against russia, and in this way china is telling the world that why did the west impose sanctions against russia, it is wrong and it is necessary

respectively, to imprison russia and ukraine, to divide the negotiations, but we understand that ukraine will not go to these negotiations until the withdrawal of russian troops from the territory of ukraine , no condemnation of war crimes, many other things. to london, his meeting with the prime minister of great britain was decided by the rishi armed forces committee. well, there were protests, er, the british did not take this visit very well. they obviously talked about ukraine. there is little information about it do you have any information on whether or not it was possible? after all, rishi sunek decided to convince the prime minister of israel near mina and no a-a that he somehow started to speak more actively and openly about aid to ukraine er-er, i so

suspect that the main reason in the end was not ukraine, but iran, because it is for the west and for britain. first of all, the iranian security threat in the remote east is among the main such warnings, and bibi, he is a person who was with the minister of israel five times before this. this is the biggest in the history of this defenseless state. and in general, the protests that are taking place against bibi, he is taking place in israel, were in london during the visit, they are connected with the fact that not tanyahu wants to push through legal reforms that will be controlled by the committee on judges and that, accordingly, the political leadership of the state can to regulate the courts by hand and in israel the main political body is the parliament, so if these reforms are adopted in the parliament with

the heavenly one, then these changes will be implemented. came out for protests, it was quite noticeable, there was an action and there was not even a single press conference on the old stream 10 after the meeting between bibi and sunok a, but you have to understand that britain and israel now have almost the best political relations, diplomatic dialogue, and last tuesday was uh yes one important document was signed between the place of foreign affairs of these two countries. in general, we know that historically britain and israel britain had a mandate in a person, then if because of this whole

history with the un, then we have this history the israeli conflict a-a regarding ukraine. i think here, most likely, it is worth thinking about the mediation of the americans, because in benjamin's principle, there is none. he is known for the fact that back in the 80s he was the permanent representative of israel at the un and he was there for quite a long time the history of cooperation with the americans, he had good relations with trump . and it was because of trump and through the mediation of trump that these abrahamic agreements of 2020 were signed, and we can say that some israelis oppose these reforms recently because they believe that this could be the elimination of liberal e-e prices is a struggle against the liberal values ​​of democracy in israel, although well, you and i perfectly understand that democracy in israel also has its own characteristics, well, that's true, mr. egor

. please tell me the visit of the king of great britain charles the third to france. by the summer, at the same time, he is going to germany, and this visit has not been postponed. please tell me why such a thing is happening there. i think that this is connected, most likely, to the fact that relations between britain and france are difficult. although they are much better now, and this may be related to brinzit that after the exit of britain from the european union, britain and france had such an economic war , although charles the third is, despite everything, he personally has a good personal relationship with the manly macron of germany. well, if we ask history

, then the current winser dynasty is in principle when their ancestors were the hanoverian dynasty from the city of hanover, germany, then in principle it is logical that britain and germany have a very common yes in their genealogy, but this must have been the first visit after charles the third became the monarch after the death of his mother elizabeth ii on september 8th 2022 and may 6th 23rd it will be 13 in 3 years and it will be the first coronation weekend weekend since edward the seventh edward the seventh this was the son of queen victoria and in 1902 in the year when he made his first visit to france, by the way, the so-called entente was formed, and then there was the first world war, and why now, well

, the official reason that macron said is the protests, that in france there are constant protests about social issues, economic problems, because of the protests was postponed this visit, although, well, this is, again, an explanation so-so, because in france there is always a protest, as you and i know, it is clear, egor. and one last question, but very briefly, about the royal family. please tell me , personally, i have the impression that when the current monarch became the king, so the support of ukraine from the monarchic house in particular became more active under elizabeth the second, but it seems to me that it was not so open and frank to you. it does not seem so. i think that there was still support

, but elizabeth the second was already in that age well let's say in 1013 that she well, other countries could not visit her there, and therefore, if but again, he zary supports ukraine despite everything, and i would once again like to have this opportunity to emphasize that charles the third was in crimea in 1996, he visited balaclava many british military aristocrats who were killed during the crimean denis in the 19th century are buried in balaclava, and in principle it is important for ukraine to convey this message that ukraine and britain have a common history and that we should continue to work on this we will work on it with them, i hope that our management will work on it mr. yehor, thank you very much for participating in the program , thank you very much for the professional answers to my question and the clarification of those sometimes problematic

moments that you have in me and in our viewers in the end, and it was yehor braylyan, candidate of historical sciences, an international overview of dachas, so before we introduce our next guest and topic, let 's take a look at what's going on there on our youtube page. of answers, the threat to ukraine, the threat of the west, your option, you vote. to be honest, not very actively, only 90 votes . and 17% consider the threat to ukraine to be a threat to the west, 78%. well , your option is six percent, and they are watching us . oh, now i can’t tell you how many people are watching us, maybe because the fact that i just didn't reload the page now , let's reload it, well, it's reloading , i'll tell you already at the very end, well, i'm ready to introduce my next guest oleksandr samarsky

, a diplomat - he is an expert of the research center to russia, mr. oleksandr, i congratulate you. glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes. thank you very much for joining the program today . well, obviously, since you are researching russia, we will unfortunately talk about this country. putin's statement, which he has been talking about for the last two days, that there will be a warehouse for nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, there will be iskanders who will be able to deliver these nuclear weapons to those corners in which he enter please tell me this statement if answering the question that we asked the audience. it was a statement for the event or for ukraine, or maybe for someone else or for something else, you know by and large , it does not matter, the main thing is that it is a wonderful

statement, i congratulate her because it is significant to a certain extent complicates any foreign policy maneuvers for autumn, including the further deepening of his ties with china in general, then this statement is most likely aimed at a western audience because we share a border with russia that is tactical nuclear weapons can be deployed here in one way or another at any moment, shelling with canders, but without nuclear weapons, there have already been uh -uh will these uh-uh tactical nuclear weapons mean some shells with nuclear filling well, we have them they can be in any - a moment ago, most likely it was such a cry of despair from putin. well, there is nothing to scare anymore. so, i will try to scare nuclear weapons once again, although he has been intimidating with them for almost 10 years, and in principle, europe

has already stopped. if from the beginning it was very afraid, it has stopped now. but such the statements definitely worry the average residents of western europe, and accordingly they demand to ensure their security and demands from their leadership. to ensure their security , which means creating further pressure on russia and more powerful and wider military aid, because today the aid is not enough, whatever it is should have been to the west, as always, balances yours and ours to some extent. i hope that such statements will incline even more the european community , i mean the voters of ordinary citizens

the side of ukraine of ordinary citizens yes, mr. oleksandr, but let's talk about european leaders, because last week there was a statement, i already mentioned it during the conversation with the first guest, there was a statement by the minister of foreign affairs of austria, oleksandr schalenberg, in which he very frankly said, stop thinking all those who thinks that russia can be completely excluded from our lives, it is not possible, russia remains our biggest neighbor and we need to establish relations with it, and now putin is talking about nuclear weapons, which will of course be aimed at west to ukraine and what in this case european leaders will say because now i will say because you said this about an average european and leaders why is it a matter roughly speaking of the european union-western europe it is the dependence of politics on the average citizens it is not

just that it can happen any - with what phrase and as they say, the people of the whole country are inclined to no, but now austria is the leadership and explains how to deal with a person who threatens everyone without any reason and in europe and austria , in particular, with nuclear weapons, how to deal with it and how to include it in the general the european security system is perfectly applauded by putin. it is clear. well, the statement of the spokeswoman of nato , which was published today in nato, said that putin's statement is dangerous and not irresponsible and short-sighted. please tell me, is it too much , or will it now in response to this move its position in some way? i don't know, maybe even tactically, nuclear weapons are probably possible to poland, maybe to the baltic countries, what could be the answer from nato

? putin, they are already kaliningrad, an accumulation of nuclear weapons, it is an enclave that directly enters nato countries, what else do you want from belarus , you want to build a warehouse there, which will only be in the summer, so even better, then it will live to the toilet. let us all try to make this warehouse as belarus a participant . aggression against ukraine she is on the forum , although under strange circumstances, diplomatic relations with russia.

they took away from us what they are doing, it is not known, the turnover has fallen, but once again, belarus is an aggressor country, the world community - it is generally seen, we can strike at this stockpile of nuclear supplies, we can, we must do it, we must do the same. in the apartment or relevant units for the movement of troops, most likely, there will be no need for this, we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons, as there were none, but besides, which will appear only in the summer on the territory of belarus, but uh, i'm sorry, but which

the preparation of the preparation of some documents, some for the processing of some options for the answer, it will of course have a bridge. beyond any doubt, the movement of troops , well, as of now, there is no need for this. and please tell me that lukashenko agreed to the fact that there will be a warehouse on his territory. - and this may indicate that putin was still able to subvert the self-proclaimed president of belarus, i don't think so. the fact is that the general situation that is developing around russia is negative and the worsening of the situation in russia itself contributes to lukashenko in maintaining a certain independence from the kremlin, so i don't think, most likely, lukashenko has something twisted about it, and so he has the development of relations with russia trade and economic is now on its way out

russia is the largest trade and economic partner of belarus there are somewhere in the billions 50 works and somewhere in the last year, apparently for the first time in the entire history of bilateral relations , the positive balance is already in favor of belarus , that is, belarus has a lot of good things from these complications and troubles of russia, and let's not forget that the father even before at the beginning of the full-scale invasion of ukraine, he himself asked to place the weapons, but when he asked, it didn’t seem to you that it was just to talk, then it could be just like that, or to talk with weapons. trade with russia is a different matter, i returned to the question that i don't know what our

leadership was talking about with parents, but i have the impression that lukashenko does not understand that he is a participant in the aggression and bears full responsibility for it, he does not understand, and ukraine arises any pressure on him, well, i came across an interview weeks ago, in particular, danilova is a smart person, everything is fine, he was answering the question why don't we break diplomatic relations with russia, the answer is this well, we don't want to anger russia for that , sorry from belarus we don't want to make belarus angry, why do we need to complicate relations with belarus? do you want to have a neighbor sitting on the border and forgive the territory of belarus, more than 600 rockets fell on us , count the number z and after that we say

about the fact that the father would be angry, and after which he would consider our interests or be afraid or know that a blow could be inflicted on him, that our saboteurs were instructed to eliminate him together with his son, it was putin's instruction to eliminate the zelen family, so what should we do with all these non-humans, who are up to the elbows in our blood and even fearing to anger them, i don’t understand, frankly speaking, they understand, and apart from someone’s or some individual groups ’ economic benefits, those who keep trade have not seen anything else behind it. unfortunately, our e politics, foreign policy is not used to the full extent to protect the life and health of its citizens, but to cover some narrowly corporate economic interests. yes, please . yes, the grain agreement and so on

. and so on and so on. the grain agreement, why is there no benefit in the grain agreement for ukraine, you understand from the very beginning, i remember i had an interview with someone, i expressed my doubts about the great usefulness of this agreement for ukraine for several reasons, the first grain is a strategic material in the world dove do we need to hurry to sell it secondly than usual trade in our grain was conducted in this way, some large grain dealers bought the crop from farmers for pennies and took it out and transferred it and sold it in the three roads, that is, the main revenue did not go to the one who produces the products, but to who bought it, transported

it and sold it, the third, and most importantly, where does the money go after that, in which banks does it settle , and what does the budget receive, and i have already come across studies on this issue in the press interesting research shows that among those who sell our grain, there are many firms registered offshore that sell grain even three times cheaper than it is on the world market at the average price, and the money in the budget of ukraine has not yet been seen to return, and diplomatic efforts to so that this grain goes to the world market. in this way, in order for russia to receive certain benefits, also in connection with this grain agreement, it was time for our leadership and

president zelensky personally to come out and say look at the grain deal, the budget received as many as this will be. fair play, it will not be done yet, and i think that it will not be done for the reasons of the third reason that all this is half of what was sold. me skepticism and such remarks and such mistrust of the foreign policy actions of our state to protect its citizens the white gate of iran for killing their weapons of ukraine new zealand imposed sanctions australia she stations and we are here too you are also a week for several high-ranking representatives and the establishment have introduced

something there. well, they are not in ukraine, it is clear, alexander , let's return for a moment to putin's statement that nuclear weapons will be deployed, what was this statement, but... it did not stand for it, but there is already a reaction from china in the ministry of foreign affairs under heaven they said that they emphasized again that they are against the use of this nuclear issue in the relations between the countries please tell me considering the visit sisinping to e. putin last week and the statements that were heard from both sides that oh well, it was possible to achieve huge results during the last year and during this meeting and in general, cooperation will be deepened now putin's statement and e.e.'s response from china can this prove

about the fact that everything is not so good in their relations. well, we started our interview, our conversation with you , with the fact that i welcomed this statement, including with the expectation that it would complicate relations with china. and the point is that what were the results of our visas, who were the accomplices and in what in the joint communique, it is written in black and white that nuclear weapons should not be placed on the territory of third countries, that is, outside the borders of the country that owns them. not even a week has passed, and you will receive nuclear weapons on the territory of a third country. the question is, what is the meaning of the word panasi at all? is it something? does or should the world pay attention to his peace initiatives, which are not behind anything and why you can't

trust that, that's why the exclusion of the eyes , these old-come sclerotic steps of putin well , he's used to scaring and forgot that recently frightened decided once again to frighten everyone, they are good for us and complicate relations with china to a certain extent, it will be seen how much they complicate china. how you were not there. it is a country interested in the defeat of russia in this war. defeat, because russia's defeat in the war, capitulation can lead to a civil war, this is the old classic marxist or leninist transformation of the imperative civil war with the subsequent turmoil

and disintegration of russia. russia is the only guarantee that we will live in peace on our land, if russia as an empire preserves the existing borders , we will not have such a skill . once again, i think it will be difficult, mr. oleksandr , literally half a minute. tell me, please. before this disintegration, how we can get involved through military , economic and diplomatic means , convincing that there is no other way, showing the experience of the schedule of the soviet union, which mostly took place peacefully and managed to take control of nuclear weapons, the main thing here is that everything is clear thank you very much, mr. oleksandr, for taking part in my program. thank you for your professional answers and for clarifying problematic issues . it was oleksandr samarskyi, a diplomat and an expert at the russian research center

. putin said two days ago that on the territory of belarus he will place a warehouse with nuclear weapons and that there will be some iskanders who can deliver these weapons to where they need to be delivered, so in these few minutes i have left it remains only to tally up the results of your vote on and er on youtube, so few people are watching us now, 609 is a pity and 152 people voted on the question i asked putin's statement about nuclear weapons of belarus is a threat to ukraine, a threat to the west, your option , yes, it is considered a threat to the west 78% of the threat to ukraine 16 and your option seven percent your option can be read later well that's all for me today in the sweet program during the war they talked about the most important things that happened during the past