[000:00:00;00] from the third , the active activity of panani pensions will begin, and then we will see all the results of this activity, because it is already clear to everyone that uh, you know, this delegation should not be happy and safe. discussions about what the russian federation is generally doing in the security council of the united nations and about the prospects of depriving it of its place in this organization, we are talking about what consequences may be from its actual chairmanship of the security council from april 1 already in general the level of meetings initiated by the russian federation at the site of the council of state security, if you would rate it, now we know that the russian federation is convening a council of state security after the arrest

order of putin, it is about the removal of ukrainian children, and then it initiates the council of state security regarding the investigation of the northern streams, continues to blame the united states special services for this e p volodymyr, it doesn’t come down to some i don’t know but spam initiatives to what extent they are not stillborn or the russian federation what are they trying to achieve continuing to spam on this site well, you know, it seems to me that it is already 1984, because the russian delegation no longer knows what to do there, everyone is happy about the security to draw attention to something that they want to be important and fundamental, but after we opened about the combatants mosquitoes, er, about biological weapons, er, i say that the phobia about the suppression of the russian church in ukraine

has simply turned the security council into such a playground, and i still need to plant it in the middle of the square, because it is straight the report was introduced from this meeting. everything is being done for russian tv. this is clearly because the smart people who are sitting , well, the serious diplomats who are sitting in new york , they perfectly understand what it is for and how it is done . because well, there russia will propose some meeting, some topic as another incomprehensible uh, there will be a discussion, but russian tv will only show the speech below, and then it will copy the nightingale to tell how the majority of the world supports them uh, without references to

what the other members of the security council will say and the russian population will not see the real picture , but this is exactly what this person is doing, this is another propaganda trick and they will use it . it is clear. our armed figures thank you, ambassadors , for always high-quality, reliable and highly qualified analytics volodymyr yelchenko, ex-representative of ukraine in the reorganization of the united nations in 15-19 years , former ambassador extraordinary plenipotentiary ukraine in the united states of america in the 20th in the 21st years, we are going further, we are now attracting to the marathon of the espresso tv channel pavla latushka, the deputy head of the united transitional cabinet of belarus, the head of the people's anti-crisis administration, long live belarus and glory to ukraine, the embassy of re, we welcome you the living eternal heroes, glory to you, i congratulate you well, let's start with the obvious, belarus, the russian federation and the placement of russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, as if

lukashenko and putin agreed on this, but so far, the united states reports that there are no signs of the transfer of this type of weapon to belarus. there is still no putin is already reminding his iskanders of the corresponding planes that were preparing for the fact that they could be the carriers of exactly such weapons , however the first question is belarus i'm really ready now to be a bridgehead for tactical nuclear weapons, i'm asking for the first thing - this was always lukashenko's desire, there are nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus . he started saying this even in the 90s, he believed and he continues to consider it a political mistake of the first leadership of independent belarus, and the decision to refuse the presence of soviet russian nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, and perhaps even 7.8 months ago, we talked, including on the air of

ukrainian tv channels, we had information that officers missile forces of belarus went to the territory of the russian federation to facilities where nuclear weapons are stored in order to study the experience of storage , logistics, transportation, delivery of tactical nuclear weapons to the territory belarus has already carried out the preparation of su-25 aircraft, which are capable of nuclear charges, it is known that the pilots have already actually undergone training , not as it is said that they will undergo it. that there will be informational pressure , including back, but i have no doubts that lukashenko signed such plans and documents a long time ago, that nuclear weapons will be on

the territory of belarus, i have no doubts также нет mr. ambassador and this story is directed against ukraine or against the european union and the euro-atlantic community , in particular against its so-called eastern flank, in particular , it is about poland and the baltic countries, there are only two interests, above all , the united interests of putin and lukashenko lukashenko is the only real ally of russia in the war that russia unleashed with the support of lukashenko in relation to ukraine is not iran, not north korea , namely lukashenko, it is precisely lukashenko that lukashenko wants putin, in order for ukraine to lose this war, based on this, it is necessary to evaluate his actions before the war and after the war, and what he does now to create an additional threat, first of all for ukraine, but also for the bloc and, first of all,

for neighboring poland lukashenko also has his personal interest. why does he want to have nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus? this is the mentality of this person. it implies that he would always like to be in the center of attention. he wants to sit at the same table with the president. the united states with the prime minister of great britain and the president of france , this again conditionally raises its status in world politics as a state on the territory of which nuclear weapons are placed. in relation to his regime a-a from the side of western countries lukashenko also believes that this will allow him a-a to return the international subject to become a partner in the negotiations let even critical but together with

therefore, this will give him the opportunity to achieve honor for him or his high representative at the negotiating table with the world powers, and it is precisely this instrument that these goals are personally pursued by lukashenko himself, and most importantly, he is convinced that the presence of nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus guarantees him a life-long rule in belarus until the last day of his life for us, for belarusians - this means the loss of confidence in independence, this means that russia receives an additional military contingent or contingents on the territory of belarus in any situation, any threat , connected with internal protests, this can be used by russia as a proposal for the introduction of a larger group of russian armed forces under the guise of protecting a-a its nuclear tactical weapons on the territory of belarus , and secondly, for belarusians, this means that we are becoming a target in the event of a potential nuclear conflict well, actually, we would like

to ask you about what lukashenko is currently doing , in particular, it is about preparation, or more precisely, about the transformation of belarus into a so-called military an appendage of the russian logistical military machine, on the one hand, there are signals that the russian contingent there is not increasing , on the other hand, we understand that russian interventionists are being trained on belarusian training grounds . well, belarusian military logistics is being driven in an appropriate way. that lukashenko had no plans to carry out aggression on the territory of belarus with the participation of the belarusian armed forces in relation to ukraine, we talked about that the scenario was possible only in cases of the formation of a strike group of russian forces near the borders of belarus and the use of part of the special

operations forces independently . the killed belarusian officers or soldiers who tried to enter the territory of ukraine, funerals in belarus, this is also a trigger inside, well, let's look at it from another point of view. congratulations, putin was also not involved in this. no interest, he solves the main strategic task, would he want to or would he be able to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus if missile strikes were carried out on the territory of belarus against the territory of ukraine, which had the absolute right to do so, when the missiles were launched from the territory of belarus, when the plane from started from the territory of belarus . does he need an unstable belarus in a situation of triggers, e.e., in a turbulent situation connected with

a split in the army or with internal protests? the strategic task, what we talked about, putin wants to eat dinner, and the main dish of ukraine, but he breaks his teeth about ukraine, but as a dessert, he receives belarus, and belarus becomes an absolute sphere of influence, if we are talking about the preparation of the belarusian armed forces, logistics on the territory of belarus . well, let's clearly analyze to understand the situation what is this year ? actually raised the combat readiness of the belarusian armed forces to the very level armament minus

could increase because i am ready to learn coherence , including in interaction with the russian armed forces, therefore, from the point of view of the readiness of the army, it is on the verge of at a high level, but again, i do not think that lukashenko will send the belarusian armed forces to ukraine today, he will not do it because for him it is like death, it creates a very serious internal political risk for him and what the belarusian partisans are trying to do, and he knows the real mood in society the society has not changed its attitude towards lukashenko, who, under the regime of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine, calls on the belarusian society not to allow the deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory in violation of its obligations under the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, in your opinion . is there any strength in the ability of belarusian society to speak up at such a really glaring moment when tactical nuclear weapons of russia can be deployed on the territory of belarus, it is

a reserved territory, and when in belarus we will make an absolutely totalitarian decision the suppression system, after all, literally in the past week, mass raids , purges, registrations took place in minsk, eh, in gomel, in kalinkovichi , in moser, in groups in brest, and a huge number of people were detained, arrested, eh new sentences are handed down every day, he talks about mass protests in belarus, it's unrealistic, well, in the occupied territories, i think that i, unfortunately, and you also understand how difficult it is to do it, he talks about local actions, which local actions are held, he talks about whether they will be in the near future, i don't take let's live and see, but talk about some kind of mass protest, it's difficult for me , the reaction of western european partners who say the first thing is that lukashenko

did not publicly confirm nuclear weapons, sorry, why? he changed the constitution and falsified the referendum when he took away the nuclear-free status of belarus, and then macron called the president of france, this was not enough , his public statement that he wants nuclear weapons is not enough, what is being prepared is not enough . when there will be nuclear weapons and then we will impose sanctions when belarus will be completely under the control of the russian federation and then we will impose sanctions we are always late, we are late with actions anticipatory and if in 2020 there was a powerful sanction strike against lukashenko, when there were hundreds of thousands of people in all belarusian cities, not only in minsk, regional districts, even in villages, then it could work. well, let's do it again now. let's wait for something else and only then will we therefore, the reaction of the europeans to me is to upset , it is necessary to act preemptively to block

the border and block the supply of goods . in relation to russia and in relation to the lukashenko regime , up to financial sanctions and the suspension of financial operations. this is what you can show lukashenko . how much will nuclear tactical weapons cost him in belarus ? decisions, well, postpone them now, it’s impossible , this will be another strategic mistake, our european partner, dear mr. ambassador , i’m pissing in the bushes, it’s possible to share some fresh information about this airfield that is used by the russian interventionists, in particular, we all saw this footage. so, when the plane of the strategic russian aviation was disabled, which you sniffed, scouted our targets, on which the russian interventionists later

launched missile strikes. so, we heard several versions of what happened. well, they asked you , so to speak, so to speak, to separate the wheat from the chaff, what information is there already regarding those events, so to speak, and what is currently happening at this airfield well, i can only say the basis is on the facts, the fact is, it was a video shoot, the fact is that the plane flew to the territory of the russian federation, the fact is that it will not start from the swamps, and it is not in ukraine for this reason, at least an air alert is not announced. so, what happened to damage the plane - this is indeed the basis of my conversation with the representative of our cabinet on law and order issues and at the same time the head of bypol alexander

mazarov. i will say from the fact that... this is this the action was significant by the belarusian partisans, and i will tell you from this version. as for the further use of the airfield, of course it is used for the delivery of transport military aircraft of the russian federation of similar cargoes to belarus. 2,000 km, that is, this distance is an airfield that poses a threat to ukraine by the use of military aviation against ukraine and objects on the territory of ukraine. thank you, mr. pavly pavlo latushko, the deputy head of the united transitional cabinet of belarus, the head of the people's anti-crisis administration , was in touch with us. well, for sure. it is important to remember the chronology of events literally on march 1.

literally now we learn that russia and belarus have joint nuclear plans , this opinion will not leave me, meanwhile, president zelenskyi arrived in zaporizhzhia, visited the position of the defense forces and met with gender director megater rakhveel money so this tuyu presidential telegram zaporizhzhia region is in an advanced position today being here with our military thank you to each of our soldiers for protecting ukraine, our sovereignty, our cities and our children, we will definitely win also the president of ukraine met with the general director of magatera fael grossi, they together visited the dnipro hydroelectric power station today in the city of zaporizhzhia , a rich exchange of information took place regarding the protection of the zaporizhzhia npp and its personnel , raphael gros wrote and assured that megate will support nuclear facilities in ukraine.

this is an important story. well, we are moving on. and now we are joining our conversation yevgenia kravchuk, people's deputy of ukraine , head of the committee on culture, science , media and sports ms. yevgenia, congratulations glory to ukraine , glory to the heroes, congratulations ukraine is preparing a resolution on the cultural genocide of the ukrainian people well, we understand that, unfortunately, not all platforms are ready to recognize the genocidal practices of the russian federation in relation to ukraine, but as for our culture , what prospects do we have here, minister of culture and information policy, oleksandr tkachenko called to recognize the cultural genocide on the part of russia, seize the assets of cooperation and promote the return of cultural values ​​to

ukraine . buildings, yes, and in fact , we are talking about purposeful destruction, as was the case with the skovorody museum, for example, there is nothing within a radius of many kilometers even close to something that looks like a military object, but a rocket flew directly into this building, a museum, but we are also talking about certain things that do not concern the buildings, but the destruction of cultural identity from the point of view of the prohibition to communicate in the ukrainian language, changes in school plans eh in the temporarily occupied territories eh what they are renaming the streets eh is that our children eh send also to the so-called water cational camps eh this is actually well , they are trying to destroy their eh ukrainian ethnicity identity and that's before

things are a part and one of the signs of nucide, that's why we go this way to give another argument that, in general, what the russians are doing in ukraine is genocide. because when a specific ethnic group is moved, they are prohibited. well, there to speak one's own language and to feel one's belonging to the people, then this is a sign of genocide. i am the author of this future resolution, and i am currently collecting all the evidence and plan to hold another hearing related to the actual educational programs, so i am turning to the opportune e to the teachers who a-a especially teachers of the ukrainian language, ukrainian literature, the history of ukraine who survived the occupation. if you are ready to testify on the platform, tell the couple how they tried to change the school plans. well, i am

ready to help so that your voice is heard throughout europe. no, evgenia, we we greatly appreciate your great work in this matter and at the same time i would like to ask about an equally important story, in particular, it concerns russian piracy, russian banditry, they do not just implement criminal practices, they are also bandits in the immediate plan, in particular looting looting ukrainian museums and we understand that this is done centrally, it is done with the approval of certain occupation administrations and all those verticals rest on the main kremlin vertical in spaska tower , where they get permits, a similar practice is not new, they also produced something similar in 1944 and 1945 years ago on the territory of europe. yes, when they took out the goods to be looted, but here they have no excuses, they cannot tell

something about a criminal nazi regime, they rob a peaceful state. they everything is being looted before the eyes of the world, accordingly those facts are recorded and accordingly, it is possible to remove their muzzles from the trough of world civilization, in particular their participation in museum intercultural programs, so because what they stole from us, they transfer to their fund stores in their various museums and then start talk about some kind of common fraternal cradle of civilizations and so on, further down the list there are some relevant mechanisms, in fact, this is one of those intense ones that what to add to the resolution is a call to abandon any cooperation with the growth of difficulties with the hermitage from the russian academy of sciences because , in fact, all these excavations that have been carried out in

the crimea since the 14th year have already been going on for many years, where they are thousands of years old the artifacts are there for 2,000 years, it’s a dead fact that they are actually there where chersonesus is, they are excavating, and the russian academy of sciences is in charge of all of this, officially and there are data, and i am now in brussels, i will have meetings with meps. including all these e-e proposals regarding nu sanctions on the cultural front well, i will also convey one more aspect. in this regard , putin is already officially in this personally , as they say, smeared because he issued a decree by which he decided to transfer the stolen museum funds. for example, only in the kherson area of ​​museums, from the kherson museum, they took out about 20,000 exhibits to be officially transferred to the museum fund

of russia, and here there is the question of the hermitage , which is actually the main curator there. yes, in the museum funds, and about you you are right what can't be here, we mean we single out this great russian culture, yes, from the fact that they just go and rob, and these are war crimes, and if we talk about the prison years and the second world war, that's exactly ukraine. by the way , eh, about the german eh there, the heritage of some movable objects showed itself from a very good side, because there were certain negotiations between germany and the country ukraine gave back certain artifacts there that were exported in the 40s, we showed ourselves as a civilized country, it is clear that in the case of russia, it is -is there is only a conditional capitulation there, i can write down one of the points that is necessary. all these things were given by the museum funds, well, and again, we ask our european partners

to watch very carefully so that these artifacts do not appear on the black market of europe, because well, let's do it too let's be honest, there are certain types of people. well, the black market also exists. and we talked about it at the meeting, and at these hearings there were representatives of unesco, and they too. well , they know about it and understand it. obviously, there should be cooperation there with the police. and the euro just and so further, ms. yevgenia, thank you very much for reminding me of the blatant history of looted museums in the kherson region, so while everyone was holding their heads, so to speak, because of the exported raccoon, we understand what the story really was, they took it away, appropriated it and are trying to legalize what was stolen, and accordingly.

i agree. what will the russians do about the difference, since they are participants in the crimes of the rest of the russian institutions and, accordingly, must i do not know to do something at the centralized level, in particular on behalf of our state, turn to the leading museum and cultural institutes of the european union and the whole world to put a block on the russians because it's not just so to speak, their culture is abstractly bad, no, it's stolen, taken out of us, it's exhibits with blood smeared with the blood of our fellow citizens, i apologize for the emotions everything is very clear , in fact , we are. meetings with representatives of the russian opposition with the aim of intensifying the dialogue and exploring ways of cooperation sometime in the future. what is known about

this meeting ? how did it take place? which representatives of the russian position were involved in the platform? of groups, of course. well, how about it's a little secret that in europe and america they are still trying to find good russians, in the case of this meeting, it's possible. well, for example, harry kasparov uh, i uh, i listened to him when he met back there in january, he passed through the threshold, in principle, the answers he gave to absolutely obvious questions, they are strangely enough, ukraine can be used to benefit , for example, he was asked what about this french senator she asked how we should work with, should we fix some bridges there, so think about it, you know, it’s not a very naive question, we understand it , but he and it’s good that it sounds from a russian well, he’s not an ethnic arsena, but,

nevertheless, from a representative in some sense the opposition of russia, what does he say? he has no hands, and it ended in the 14th year with a vote for the annexation of crimea, so sometimes when such things are heard, it is not from ukrainians, even lithuanians there. i understand, you understand what it is about, but there is always a border here, because there are enough agents in all liberal oppositions, and you always have to be on the alert so that this does not happen. then the ear about negotiations and so on, and when the final comes about cooperation in the future, what is there to do well, now there is talk about cooperation in the future, they are looking for dialogue and studying ways of cooperation in the future, what is meant by cooperation in the future , that is, these people are considered as a tribunal

, it is meant in the future, and there is not a single person there who lives in russia, among those who were at this meeting, well, at least i didn't see anyone there. that is, it's uh, let's say , uh, these are, well, like tjahanovsky stegnovsky , too, everyone here uh, there are different from site to site they are there because they want to be with someone to say this, what kind of uh, why is it an unpleasant trend, but here if we can no longer prevent this, uh, we need to think very correctly about how ukraine should verify these uh, that means liberal uh, oppositionists, because we have, for example, uh those who, for example, live in ukraine and even received ukrainian citizenship, and oh my god, ilya forgot my last name, i’m moving, but none the less, they