of the moscow patriarchate and 54% are in favor of banning them altogether. what do you think is the right way to provide people with such and such correct information? well , once again, we need to work with the leadership in our country. the parties were provided with tv channels for relevant conversations and also bishop pavlo, who has been speaking with impunity until now about uncanonicality and all the violations of our civil and religious rights that we have, they sounded and none of them as they say, i didn't dispute and didn't cut it off, i understand that for today by the way, i talked about this on the eve of the unification

council with petro oleksiiovych er poroshenko when er was preparing and the unification council was held and we have a governor in each oblast, who is what do we call the head of the military administration? we have a representative of the ministry of culture . we have special services and services . by the relevant e-e citizens of i think that everything will fall into place. but don't you think that the problems of church affairs are simply not always, well, people trust the parishioners of a particular church in the authorities directly, maybe somehow the clergy need to work in this direction. he also said about this that it is necessary to work with the heads of e-e dioceses by deacon bishops

on the ground, and they already accordingly as they say in our country, the vertical structure is a church one, and i think everything will be sorted out, you just need to keep everything under control and not give the opportunity for it to be this is a russian propaganda machine, it continued its activities, thank you, thank you, no, vladyka oleksandr drabynka, metropolitan of the orthodox church of ukraine , we are following what is happening in the shevchenkivskyi district of kyiv on this broadcast. then vitaly greenhouse and i will return pain can become an obstacle not with my knees from knee pain try dolgit cream dolgit cream anesthetizes, reduces swelling and improves

the mobility of the joints, you can also walk, the only one yellow cream for pain in the joints, buy with a discount of 15% long cream 150 grams in pharmacies antsya pharmacy, a penny and an apothecary , a bitch, the stairs can't walk anymore, wait a long time , there is no health. what kind of health is there for our ten, i thought so until i tried it gerovital gerovital plus phytovitamin complex also takes care of the heart and strengthens the body gerovital plus good health - active life novelty gerovital energy even more iron for good deeds gerovital energy intake once a day cinema television sports music education free people have a choice choose what do you want on megogo, there are no potatoes, you won't bring anything, but my son has caught something

, i remind the mother of dr. tice's comfrey and you get back to work honey with comfrey german ointment for pain in the joints and muscles opa with spikes restores movement from pain in the joints and muscles natural comfrey ointment from dr. tais, save by buying a large volume of ointment 100 grams , let's continue the program today, polyakova lived, what a season winner, mr. vitaly, let's start our conversation with vladimir putin's visit to turkey, everyone started discussing that oh, maybe he is there they are arresting but why are they arresting if turkey has not ratified the rome statute and they, in principle, have already publicly declared that putin can come freely and absolutely calmly go back home but it is interesting now that this visit

is such a statement from the ruffian and her reprimand that he is on the side of russia well i think it's not related to that, it's related to the presidential elections and the bodies, it's a rather difficult situation because for the first time in many years he can actually lose these elections and he needs to show that he is a politician who owns the situation in many regions of the world that he has good relations and events and meetings and that he can invite putin and meet with biden and who else has such opportunities , in fact, no one really says that turkey is now displacing switzerland from the place of a neutral intermediary because the russians refuse switzerland the role of a mediator with turkish mediation, they count that i think it is connected with this and for vladimir putin it is important to go there or to show that these warrants do not have any importance that wherever he wants to go there he goes to this by the way, we were talking i know. it seems to me that he will always cause damage, this time it is written that now the main idea of ​​russia will be to show that he is worthless

, they will do so. where he can come, they are important for him, of course, and there will be countries that identified roman aesthetics where he will also go. we must also prepare for this. and nothing will happen there either, well, this is the worst for us , well, this is logically true, because it is obvious that if some country was carded by the roman states , let's say the south african republic will be interested in putin's visit, then his he will not be arrested there, he will come and go, as has happened many times with other people involved in such warrants. hanna's policy in relation to russia is now based on an electoral request to show that he is so tough to the international arena. is it still the case? hmm, the people of turkey are ready to support ukraine . is based on money, one way or another , relations with russia are money for the turkish economy and for the turkish elite, and one way or another, erdoğan tried to take advantage of this situation that arose when all western countries

sanctions were introduced against russia. turkey introduced them in order to somehow get money for this. it was not introduced. to get money from russian billionaires . to get russian tourists . to get exclusive residents of turkey with a lot of money. can hide money on the one hand and provide a standard on the other. well, there is also the united arab emirates , that's why so much information is already coming from dubai, that is, no one has ever heard that he was there one or another russian player, oligarchs, officials, everyone is there now, but still agree that the climate in turkey is somehow better, the sea is more, my yacht, where to swim, white , where to build, not only in the emirates, the emirates

is rather a place of such a rest, but a place of permanent many of these people have tried turkey and it's money because they came there on their own. they came there for money. this is something that interests the cardigan . i'm the cardigan. i am helping to set up a corridor so that food can be exported from ukraine to poor countries, and here i allegedly maintain economic ties with russia and build business. i think it is because he is a person of autocratic composition, no one can make him special , let's say so will present some real claims, you understand, on the one hand, they cannot in turkey , they can remove you from office. if you lose the election , then the situation will be completely different and no one can in the west because erdogan is not orban , turkey occupies such a strategic role

plays that, of course, no one really wants to seriously quarrel with its leadership, but he uses it, that is, he is more independent than, for example, the prime minister of hungary, regardless of external influences , that is, plus, he can play his game in the middle east, he has his own interests, that's why it's also important for him to communicate with putin, it's all absolutely the same. you understand , it's not a question of when a person leaves the value , respectively, it's a question of when a person leaves the issue of maintaining power. that's how it turns out. by the way, in hungary, an interesting situation because this week the president of hungary talked to the pink and infophobic erdoğan, and she just announced after these katelinov talks that russia should withdraw its troops from ukraine, that it supports the peace plan of ukraine, and by the way, she is , like me, more critical

the position is more in our favor than orban, but i understand that because of the form of government of hungary , it does not matter at all, the president has no influence, this is such a game, orban says what is actually carried out and is implemented . i am correcting this position of orbán in accordance with some tactical tasks, and the president utters these phrases that are necessary for hungary to be considered part of the event, so when president joseph biden held a summit of leaders of central european countries of this format there, orbán was not there. he did not come to meet the president of the united states, and the president of hungary went , formally, everything is fine, she is the head of state, but in fact bayda did not talk to the person who makes the decision, but when the turks of the turkic world were in turkey there

orban went, not the president of turkey. well, that's how they always behave. there was one of the turkish leaders in ukraine, where i was the hungarian leader. i was the president of hungary, and orban 24 is in no hurry to go here, he does n't really need it. i can see it, considering the fact that he was invited . the president of ukraine, he is not coming here, and the fact that orban is practically in unison with lukashenka, as he talked about it at the beginning of our conversation, expresses this idea that , as they say, it is necessary to start peace negotiations now without preconditions, this also says uh, i would like to tell you, whose foreign policy is the hungarian leadership? by the way, the hungarian ruling party on friday , the country's parliament adopted a resolution in which it declared its commitment to achieving peace in ukraine, and most of its text is nevertheless a criticism of the sanctions against the russian federations , that is, again they show that we support ukraine, but in fact we want

to cooperate with russia, not so many can block hungary on its own. so when it feels some kind of external support, it it makes me happy, this is a great example of the decision to accept sweden's donation. hungary, like turkey, only made a decision to accept finland . i am sure that when the turkish parliament makes a decision to accept sweden, the hungarians will also do it , but now they criticize the fact that nothing depends on them sweden is told that swedish politicians behave badly in relation to hungary, that they are criticized and the government calls out and repents. frankly, i am surprised because, let's say, when turkey says that they will not vote on the acceptance of sweden's donation, it is not about the fact that someone said something about the president, there are institutional claims, i won't talk about their feasibility now, but it is precisely because of the sheer torjezia , what needs to be done there, you have to adopt

anti-terrorist legislation you should carry out the deportation of this or that person there . you should be more thorough. your special services should cooperate with ours. this is a conversation at the level of state institutions. again, i believe that this is an absolutely far-fetched conversation in principle sweden has fulfilled all the demands of turkey, but it is happening. the president does not leave the hurricane and does not speak. listen, because here they said bad things about me. it is not demonstrations, we will not vote for you , but the hungarians do. here is an authoritarian regime. we cannot vote for a country whose government officials speak so much about us, and this means that if turkey really says so, you know. we have no institutional claims to agreements with sweden. hungary is supported, but they always want to prove that they can play an independent role in the foreign policy arena and can block entire collective decisions, let's say nato, the european union

, but you said that turkey can afford it and hungary can't so much so what is the west that will allow the urban to play this game, well, you see that the west is also finding its possibilities of levers of pressure not only on hungary, well, finland eventually joins us, although at first president oleg did not want to launch you ani finland, ani shvets, and i assure you that sweden will also join, what for to erdoğan, this is what he accepted finland, he did not accept sweden, this is also an element of the pre-election struggle. this is how i defend turkish state interests after the elections. whoever wins them, of course, the parliament of turkey will make this decision, i am absolutely sure of this, because it is not relations with sweden that depend on it. and relations with the united states regarding orbán. i think there will be many more moments related to the fact that everyone is now interested in how to simultaneously preserve the right of veto of each country on some principled decisions and at the same time prevent hungary from actually

to blackmail the european euro-atlantic structure, you see that the meeting took place, or will it take place at the level of ukraine, nato, at the level of the minister of foreign affairs, which would always be tortured, hungary allowed it to be held because the general sector said that i was already tired of it let's go we will approve the general order at home, not every decision, and it turned out that when it comes to the general agenda , hungary did not find the strength to boycott it. it is necessary to soften the position of course to drift, let's say. by the way, we discussed with you about the rome statute. and which countries can which countries have ratified and in theory can arrest putin. however, ukraine has not ratified the rome statute since 2000

, accepted it if it signed it legally , but it is not ratified e p vitaly, now again such debates are going on about the fact that the minister of justice molyusko said that these are all myths surrounding the fact that our military volunteers will be directly arrested in other countries, as it was with markov, and the military are really worried about this, i don’t think it’s a myth. the rome statute, that’s why it exists and from the international criminal court of ukraine, that when it comes to war crimes, they don’t distinguish between who is the victim and who is the aggressor. there is an absolute concrete evidence of war crimes is absolutely obvious to me the fact and this process proves enough of the international criminal court in the former yugoslavia, there are docks of serbs, croats and bosnian muslims and kosovar albanians and for no one

there are no exceptions and no one says, you know, we will not judge the croatian general because serbia attacked them, there is a simple approach, yes, you were attacked, this does not mean that you have the right to commit war crimes , so countries whose armies are involved in some wars are not they do not ratify the roman statute of their own will, this applies to the united states, this applies to israel, because everyone perfectly understands that when military operations take place , in one way or another, there are people who go beyond the acceptable format, they are not necessary pretend that they do not exist we always want to live in there are some illusions in the world and there is a political moment. imagine that the international criminal court issues an order for the arrest of such a citizen of ours, a soldier, a hero . russia is obvious. what was in russia, upon request , there will be some specific people testifying in the future, it may not be russia , it may be citizens of ukraine.

who are there who will testify that during the stay of the ukrainian army in one or another place there is not such a sound at close range, but russia can just be bombarded with requests and our military will be arrested for verification well, i think that for verification - it is impossible, the warrant can be issued for a real crime , you are just afraid of what you need to fear. to prove and again, not by itself, it may not act as a plaintiff, some international human rights organization, some group of citizens that will not be formally connected with russia, which receives this information and at some point an international criminal the court, this person will be abroad, he will not even know about it, he may be a person with enormous authority in society, as general vlada, the croatians were very dissatisfied and had to agree to

the fact that he will appear at the tribunal for the crimes of the former plant, this of course has a huge the psychological effect because it shows that they didn't lie, that's when they said that no, we can commit a crime , but ukrainians also do, they didn't lie, that's if it was, it means that it can be you understand, such things are always carried out, and in public opinion, i would say, they enter in such a way that in order to reduce the weight of the crimes of the aggressor, i will give you a beautiful historical example, we are now talking a lot about the crimes of the soviet army in the territory of hitler's germany after its occupation and the germans talk a lot about it in recent years, they would publish a book, we hear about these terrible crimes

, do you understand and did it happen? it’s terrible and i’m telling you to see soviet troops there. they also did exactly what the book says, but this conversation is factual. it’s not some kind of fiction or propaganda. it distracts us from another conversation about the crimes of the german army on the lands of ukraine, belarus, and the holocaust movement, that is, everything turns upside down, not only they were submitted, but also we you. and i always believe that it always matters who started first, because i always remind you that if there were no hitlerites on this earth, there would be no soviet army in germany or she would have been there, but as an aggressor with a completely different role, and this is an important moment

. you came here, you committed numerous crimes here, you actually sowed the seeds for future crimes on your land, and you bear double responsibility not only for the murdered and raped jewish woman there a girl or a ukrainian girl, but also for every murdered german girl who was raped, a non-soviet soldier is responsible because he should have sat at home and not been there and then he would have committed another crime in his head, well that was if it wasn't your problem, your girlfriend and children would be alive and this is the story, which , by the way, dates back to the 50s and 60s. i remember the memories of people who came to germany in the 50s and 60s and said that somehow it is strange that the germans talk about how they saved themselves from the soviet soldiers who were here because of them and criminals, but they say absolutely nothing about the crimes of the ss in e-e

poland or in ukraine, and when i talk about it, we did not know about it, but here we knew and it is dangerous, and the serbs also skillfully used it because what is happening now we agreed. who is on the dock in the hague, the former president of kosovo, er, hashem, did he trade er, er people's organs, what is he accused of? well, we will find out when there will be a real trial, we will understand about this, whether he will be found guilty or not will be guilty, but this topic is important, but against the background of this, we remain unanswered. and who created the atmosphere in kosovo in which this armed conflict between serbs and albanians was born? i visited kosovo when it was already very serious . the situation is an emergency in this

region, but the leader of the consular albanians was professor ibrahim rohova, who would have been a supporter of non-violent protest, not violently speaking , we will exercise our rights with the help of non-violent protest, because violence is not our method . this is such a balkan hans and he convinced me. i remember that this is the only possible means, just a holy man, you know. even when they were getting younger, he started evicting the kosovars from their of his native homes, he flew to belgrade by himself, to pronounce it in a derogatory way, not to do it, in fact, how to fly to prison well, because such a person is such a person, what do they do, the cef leadership is doing it, it is compromising him , it is doing everything possible to deprive him of his influence, to prove that there is no violent resistance it will not give anything, it will increase the repression

and in the end a force will be born. it is obvious. yes, but who is responsible for this, the albanians or the serbs? i think the server is responsible for this , the president miloša and the children are responsible for the serbian the state is also responsible for these crimes that the radicals in the kosovan national rus could have committed . we will ratify the rome statute and several ukrainian soldiers will be arrested there. this will change this paradigm of vision absolutely brilliantly noted by mr. vitaly , because it is the same as a rapist attacking a victim , the victim kills him defending himself, and then every why did you kill him? and the fact that he attacked him somehow recedes into the background, absolutely right, this is a famous russian case about

the khachaturian sisters who killed their father, who raped him all the time, and now, by the way, they started cases against him after his death so that after all, understand that they killed him because they were defending themselves, well, it’s a horror, just a horror , in fact, i have to say that russia is such a father of these khachar sisters, and of course he would very much if he were not killed alive and we would very much like prove that they are a criminal similarly the truth, well, because against the background of his and their crime, his crime does not look so terrible, here it is important. we also do not always have such unfortunate vessels. well, we cannot specify a fair sentence. the court must make a legal decision and sentence based on the collected facts. yes, but this story with a 14-year-old girl from transcarpathia is simply terrible . in fact

, when these rapists are released, they are still studying in the same village. let's move on and volodymyr zelenskyi said that they want to create a tribunal for russia through a un resolution, and this is an interesting fact. because our partners are talking about such an option as a hybrid e-e special tribunal, but it was not created specifically to investigate the crime of russia, and some say on those that already exist, add certain legal obligations to consider crimes in russia against ukrainians , but our government insists that it should be a completely separate tribunal in order for us to have more powers in it. how do you do you think, mr. vitaliy, there will be some pressure from the western countries

so that russia will not be dragged into the game for a long time, because this is not russia’s attraction by and large, such a tribunal is an absentee tribunal, that’s the difference between an international criminal court and any wind by what tribunal, in any format that we want to create, we are talking about sentencing in absentia vladimir putin or other people who may be brought before this tribunal as part of their responsibility, and the event actually says that it is the international criminal terminal is a tool of the international court of justice, let's use it until the russian leadership controls the power in its own country , that's all. i would say a diplomatic competition. the american understood that the court is working and there are no real opportunities to influence the defendant except for moral condemnations, so it is roughly like our case with viktor

yanukovych, on the other hand, viktor's language yanukovych that they could take away any assets in this court. that is, it would be at least some kind of economic punishment, but we are fine and it is understood that as a politician it was important that he even appear virtually in this court. and we perfectly understand that russia will ignore any - what is the process , besides moral satisfaction, this is how it is with sanctions, the ukrainian president constantly imposes sanctions on the national security and defense council of ukraine when sanctions were introduced and the result of these sanctions was the loss of even citizens of ukraine, i.e. the question is to what extent property control sanctions can be imposed against the citizens of ukraine, as was the case with the tv channels of medvedchuk. it still had some appearance of some kind of result when sanctions are introduced, let's say how today against

the federal security service of the russian federation against there the council of the russian federation, there are simply some individual russian politicians , etc., the question always arises for me . why is this done in principle, that is, i would like to understand. i'm just curious what is concrete result, these people have property here, they are engaged in some kind of financial activities on the territory of ukraine, they have some kind of business in ukraine, which they will get rid of, what is it, we are ironic about russian sanctions against american politicians, journalists , public figures, etc., because uh, why are these sanctions not are asymmetric from the point of view of russian sanctions against the combined american sanctions against the russians, they are obviously bank accounts in russian , soviet banks have an account because russians go to america, this is not what you know

new because they are treated there, they are born there, they have real estate there, they earn money in russia to spend it in the west, the vast majority of the russian elite, therefore , for those people for whom it is important, these are really serious sanctions. to travel and have some property and real estate in other countries, in principle , american old men have no meaning, they can only laugh at it because everything they have is concentrated in russia, but when russia led sanctions against the sanatorium, mccain laughed at it, so we also have to realize that this is exactly how our sanctions can affect the russians who are going to come here in a tank. well , i think that symbolism is very good, but symbolism is very often synonymous with helplessness, and we do not have to look like russians, we must engage in effective actions