[000:00:00;00] and for 3-4 years, russia would not be like the soviet union. well, why wouldn't russia pull such a number of increases in nuclear warheads of missiles as the west did? well, they don't go for it, and i'm very surprised because stretching it seems to me that it does not reduce the escalation now, on the contrary, more decisive actions, even statements , could perhaps seriously cool the opinion of all these blackmailers who, by the way, at this time, thus gain more time, and in fact, all this is so insufficiently decisive they promote actions the proliferation of nuclear weapons and i cannot rule out that the number of nuclear states will dramatically increase in the coming years . well, of course, china will also start making more

nuclear warheads and missiles in order to increase its potential in this sector, and this could definitely be stopped simply by giving right away and not drag it to an unknown place. by the way, the usa already stated that under the previous administration, when they were blackmailing the russians, they immediately themselves simply said , we, too, are leaving and that’s it, and russia crawled on her knees and begged no, let’s be continue and now look at what is being done, they are blackmailing with things that are strategically unprofitable for them, why are they losing strategically, let's take any moment and these statements against russia are just to grasp at straws in the war with ukraine. does this mean to valery that the united states of america still leaves this window of opportunity for putin and for russia in order for them

to get out of the current war and somehow return there to some point well, if not zero point 1 2 in which they are, that is if they wanted the uh collapse of russia as you say how if i understand correctly that is uh the arms race just nailed russia that is they wouldn't stand it right i understood your words well yes in this in this regard the arms race and in some others moments that they could have done, it would also simply have led to the impossibility of development there, which is not the same as development. well, the same thing would happen again, which is exactly the same with the soviet union. no, they don't want it , they don't want it, and maybe i i don't know

if they spent it or not, i say frankly and i say it now, as a citizen of ukraine, i am not interested in what will happen there after the inspection. i am interested in whether the security umbrella on the border with russia and belarus by aggressive countries is reliable , that is , this is what i am interested in. but we do not have such a thing; in the format for the first time since 2017 ukraine nato at the level of foreign ministers perhaps something will be promoted in terms of statements of serious freedoms started before ukraine in nato then i could take it more calmly such a stretching of time with pleasure for russia for decades, that is, i cannot accept it because it is this country that is destroying the world, it is on our borders, it is on our territory, that is why my conclusions as ukrainians are perhaps more emotional, but from the point of view of e-

well, common sense, well, you can’t jump over a ditch in two jumps , that is, you can’t pull like that, you can do it once , stop, and take some further steps if they want to preserve the balance in the world , but by stretching it like this, the number of victims of our people on our territory, that's why i believe that general mili was obviously the right, absolutely right, to whom we are grateful for the fact that he is constantly involved in supporting ukraine and is constantly in contact with the general for alkali , but he said at a closed meeting in the senate that he can to completely stop russia from de-occupying the territory as much as possible by involving the usa in the war, that is, simply as an ally of ukraine , everything will stop after that, well, you see , they all concentrated on the fact that they

will protect too much and we are on the right nato member here we are. now we have such a situation that should not be repeated again. we have to draw conclusions right now. what conclusion can you draw now? i have my own solutions, my weapons of deterrence, my missile technologies, my medium-short-range missiles, and all this must be done now, because the world is unknown. what else will happen, how will the situation with you really escalate, the threat is possible, and what actions will be taken next period, friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel, also on our social networks, we are now on youtube and on facebook for those who are currently watching us live on youtube and on facebook please like this video to promote it in the recommended well and subscribe to our social media channels we are on all social networks and you can also join our of the sponsor club of the youtube sponsor club now we will show you the qr-codes

by which you can join the sponsors of the espresso youtube channel, we will be grateful for any help, in addition , remember that we have a wonderful site which is located at espresso.tv, you can read the news 24 hours a day, we work for you seven days a week, 24 hours a day , for the most up-to-date information from ukraine to the world , as well as the entire front column, all this is on the espresso tv website. politician extraordinary and plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine from the united states of america in 2015-2019 valery chalyy, we are talking about what is happening in the world , how the world is reacting to the russian-ukrainian war , what actions are being used in order to put it on

russia's place, valery, another country, another powerful player - this is china, all the meetings with putin, and she did not give simple answers to the questions that we have, why is china in this situation outside or , let's say, above the war and does not put a full stop. does not force putin to put an end to this war ; later information appeared that china was preparing for war, such headlines were um , you could see that in some world news and information agencies, china stated that its military is ready to cooperate with the russian the military to strengthen strategic communication and coordination, e.e. xi jinping revealed the topic of readiness for war in separate speeches before the parliament, in one case he told his generals that they should fight boldly, in addition, the chinese government

announced a 7.2% increase in china's defense budget, which doubled over the past decades and also about plans to make the country less dependent on foreign grain imports and in recent months the country has promulgated new laws on military preparedness new bomb shelters in in the cities on the other side of the strait is meant from taiwan, but taking into account this information that appears in the world media , is this evidence that china is preparing for war and that such a war will take place so that china does not want any negotiations or to agree on something there, they just follow the same scenario. as you said of the russian federation , that is, they look at what he does later and will already, as the chinese like it , improve the technology of war and

the technology of filing and withdrawing this war world, well, there are two questions: do they look at russia , of course, they look carefully at what i have already said, threats of weapons of mass destruction, but here, since soviet times, the legacy of russia has been inherited by the chinese, who developed it all and, in principle, continue to do so after some period , they will more powerful, but that's not the main strength of theirs, of course they now understand the need for a large army of land forces, that is, they are looking at the use of drones and means of communication, including space starling was used differently. by the way, not only this was used, and they are looking at hypersonic missile weapons, that is, carefully. like

all serious countries, they are analyzing everything , but for the first time in recent decades , china has really changed its rhetoric and began to express itself very decisively. what this will lead to is still difficult to say because, in my opinion, he is a competitor of the usa and the country of measures that did not say his word here , uh, there are some elements, but well, china cannot get out of dependence so quickly, which , for the sake of justice, is the interdependence of uh, and china and countries of entry into the united states on trade, huge trade with the european union for the united states, will they feed their people? if suddenly the united states, for example, cuts chinese imports from china in half, this will mean the collapse of china's economy. i think that will lead to

a problem at least. of course, they sound for taiwan's domestic policy, this is serious because the control of taiwan is full, it was declared from the high stands of the party, but the means in what way through military operations or other means of this in my opinion, there is still no choice, that is, preparations are underway for the possibility of using all means in a military plan to achieve these goals, whether it will be used or not will be unknown, but on the example of russia and absolutely senseless actions that will eventually lead to an attack on russia itself, that is, the same this is exactly what can happen from china, china, you know that. well

, he is not confucius, and the chinese are not an ideal model of the country, to put it mildly, of the countries in the world, the way they are acting now surprised me a lot. i think they make a lot of mistakes before, china was perceived in the world as a country that advocates nuclear non-proliferation, tries to balance the west there in some regions, well, in the usa, let's say it is in the middle east, and now they will perceive everything closer, closer like russia, well, it can hit you in the world, it plays to a greater extent image well, china doesn't have its own hollywood, relatively speaking . although they want to do it, too. because of economic considerations, that is, it seemed to me that economic expansion and such advancement

are gradually taking over technology, they are more achieved if now they switch to threats and military escalation. i think it will have an impact. it is bad for their capabilities. well, it is. what i see from the outside . why do they do this to me? the next time will tell us. when war is applied, everyone is preparing for it. it is not a secret, in the same way, in the strategic documents of many countries and the united states , china is also considered an adversary, which can use military forces for good reason. was considered so explosive to you if it wasn't uh, i don't know what to call it what russia did in europe, that is, they unleashed a large-scale war in europe. and in principle , it was a lever somewhere, so conflicts will be a question only in the degree of their intensity and covered by the world

conclusion i still want us to concentrate on ukraine, that is, as world events develop, we will not influence everything, we cannot influence even what is objectively destroyed, the international universal system , the un's security provision is trampled of the un charter and at the same time, the aggressor presides over the un, even though it is formal, well, this is all happening , we need to forget about it, we need to form our own system where we can really influence . that is, where we can be protected, that is, even the most realistically . but at the same time we need to understand that without us finding weapons of deterrence in ukraine and reacting to all these trends as well, it will not work out in any other way. we have to do it. and this is bad news because

we would like to develop after the war i would like to develop the economy, not only to restore the country, but also to develop faster, and the world is now on a very dangerous path, very dangerous, and china, unfortunately, in my opinion, does not yet play the role of a large country , at least in terms of population, economic opportunities, which the chinese could play in this is to play a leading role , and they are going in a wrong way, a wrong way, which, by the way , is absolutely not inherent in china, read chinese stories, read how they have historically won positions in principle and compare it with what is being done now as china can help ukraine now. why am i asking this because after the visit to moscow, zelenskyi said that he would like to see

sydneypinym in kyiv and in ukraine because the last time he wears zinpinymy, he communicated even before the start of a large-scale war, what zelenskyi wants and what he can give everyone to zelenskyi and ukraine, i will tell my subjective point of view that china cannot be a peacemaker , a peacemaker or a mediator in the russian-ukrainian war, what president macron is saying now, preparing for a visit to beijing, and ursula fonderland will be accompanied by together they will go, they are currently preparing for this visit on april 5. it seems to me that this expectation is perhaps an exaggeration that china can change its position in some way . influence er more constructively . it seems to me that china. in this plan, during the war

between russia and ukraine, we lost and er well, you don't need to build politics on illusions, the most that china can do for ukraine is not to help russia. well, that's obvious, and of course we were counting on him to have a clearer position, not only to the letter, but also to the spirit. of the un charter well, but it turned out to be possibly unprofitable for them , as they calculated. that is why it is important for us that china did not consider relations with ukraine through the prism of competition, a clash with america, that is, china only looks at us that way now. its existence in the defense of a nuclear state and other large nuclear countries. such a position is already an illusion for me. there are none

in relation to this communist china. it seems that the problem is in reporting the position, we have already lost this moment here . the problem is that they have determined that they have entered this big geopolitical game. one must respect oneself and forget the results on the front of opposing russia in all directions pushed out of our territory, then china will talk to us in a completely different way on facebook, secretary of the national security and defense council oleksiy danilov wrote about the 12 steps of the deoccupation of crimea well, i think that this was just a vision of danilov himself. i don't know if you are familiar with the 12 steps or should they be considered the 12 steps

of ukraine and not oleksiy danilov, among other things , he wrote there about criminal prosecution for collaborationism and high treason illustrations in crimea deprivation of pensions of russian civil servants in crimea extradition to ukraine of suspected state citizens of ukraine to russia or its legal successor criminal prosecution of russian propagandists well, that is, well, such a plan from e-e danilov, is it time to articulate on behalf of the state and the state of ukraine whether this de-occupation plan has a bullet right now, because we remember that before the beginning of the large-scale invasion there was the crimean platform and there are all the ideas of how the situation around the crimean peninsula will develop there. was discussed and talked about and there was also a plan two years ago, a five-year plan was adopted

if i am not mistaken , what should be done according to yours now, and what should be done or should i wait? well, first of all, i i take seriously all the statements of the ukrainian official representatives, well, even more so the secretary of the national security and defense council , i myself worked there, and i do not allow that something can be done frivolously, well, or not be coordinated and agreed, in this regard, i would say so i read the title carefully. i absolutely support the de-occupation of crimea 100% , that is, i believe that a detailed document, a plan , is being prepared, as it says

. and there are detailed elements that are quite general, i can say so in the informational work , from the point of view of why i asked you, mr. valery , because there is a lot of irony there that a monument should be erected to a russian ship going to and about the fact that sevastopol should be renamed to there is some city number six or something there uh, i don't remember object number six, that is, it counts , that's why i say it's a plan for the phase of the war uh , which is now including elements of this war of various uh directions, gas, real, already de-occupation there are plans and restoration of the crimea this of course, it is a detailed document and resources, and by the way, it is a strategy, there are government documents where it is more clearly, well, in such more legally

measured, measured words, it is stated here that there must have been a goal, why should it become public, that is, i think that if this goal is achieved then we will simply wait for de-occupation. there are already more such documents that we are used to seeing more official documents. i would comment on it like this, that is, there are documents from the war period, there are documents when the war ends, you already mentioned that russia began to preside at the un security council on april 1, zelenskyi said that this presidency and the status of russia as the head of the soviet union is the complete bankruptcy of such institutions, kuleba called it a bad joke because it was april 1, that is, the day

of laughter, yarmak said that this presidency is it is a shame why why ukraine and its allies understand that this is a shame and most members of the council of security and members of the un believe that it is absolutely acceptable that a country that is in the status of an aggressor can manage the council of security, which is actually one of the main highest bodies the united nations organization well, i have already started talking about it. there are three such dimensions . the first organization of the united nations must be understood that it is in the part of ensuring security , that is what is written in the statute, why was the security council created? well, it really did not go bankrupt.

ara answers, it's all destroyed, you can count on it only because russia is doing it, they use the legal system very cunningly and cunningly, and what was before they destroyed these rules and these norms, and they continue to use it well, actually it is possible and we should do it, but we need to clearly understand everything, put a bold cross on this part of the work of the united nations organization, they do not have the opportunity according to the un charter to respond to security threats, if these threats come out, it is the members of the security council, everything is the first part and the conclusion i make is the following that we need to look for another framework, that is, the framework of the security system, that is , the system of collective defense, and such

a regional and in the atlantic nato, the un, the un,