[000:00:00;00] here, well, millions of them are already 140 million . well, well, they could have gone out long ago if they had 140 hryvnias, if they wanted to. i attended a demonstration in support of a free lithuania in the early 1990s in moscow , when everything was quiet and peaceful in ukraine, and this demonstration, in which you could not even pass, was so dense, the number of people

stretched for a kilometer, they occupied me the entire street was twerking. this huge artery continued along tverskaya yamsky to the belarusian railway station and ended closer to red square. by the way, the demonstration also created an illusory hope in me that the russian people have changed. if people can go out into the street under the slogans of freedom for lithuania , then they allow dismantling peri. now i understood how in this demonstration and why these same people did not come out in such numbers later . it is not because they became richer and not because they suddenly became conservatives, on the contrary , during this time a huge number appeared young people who never studied in soviet schools, you understand and did not have all this soviet propaganda about a single country, there is a very simple logic. lithuania can be a free country because they are strangers to us. people, if they do not want to be with us, then let them not

be and ukraine sorry, this is russia, so there may be a certain number of people in moscow against the war in ukraine, but this is a marginal number. we have never seen a large number of people there, moreover, notice that even among the large number of people protesting against the war in ukraine, a huge number of russians are protesting precisely against the war, but do not refute the idea that ukraine is not russia , on the contrary, even how can we, how can we bomb our brothers. corresponds to russian proverbs about the bombing of voronezh, they are against the bombing of voronezh, but if you ask them, do you think

that ukraine is another country, there is a venetian artist and gallerist katya margolits, you know no, this is the most famous figure now in the liberal russian segment of facebook, i never found out about her, if the truth is, it seems to me that my colleagues with the joy of freedom talked to her and she would never have been friends. she is my friend. i didn't know anything about her, but they write about her practically all my colleagues, almost all journalists, public figures, oppositionists, and what kind of facebook i have, somehow, there are almost no activists of united russia left, and i’m sure that they remained because they all unfriended me a long time ago, even those whom i didn’t open and i’m in them place too i would do it, i don't want to sit in prison for that, god forbid, i wrote the ports , who's length is correct, you are friends with a nazi

, good, exact answer, what is this katya margolis doing, she does nothing like that in principle , she writes ukraine is a different state, we all even those who do not live in russia are responsible, she lives in 20 years , those who are citizens of russia did not live in russia are responsible for this war, we should be ashamed. in russia in that the time when children and women die in izyum, we should be ashamed, this is the responsibility, this whole segment of facebook has been harassing her for months, including people who have received political asylum in ukraine, i will not name their names because it will look like a political denunciation from the other side, these people are publicly available

they write their comments sick woman we are here why we are against the war against the war but for the war it does not mean for ukraine you understand it is against your inconveniences because of the war for the sake of corporating ukraine normally so if we were normal people, not such idiots as putin, then we could somehow buy to create a good model of russia, a liberal democratic liberal empire, i speak of my time , anatoly chubets, in whatever ukrainians they themselves would like to be, they would not need all this from state races, all this from theirs the language is all fiction, we know that this is just an ordinary russian village, and we, with our putin narrative, make them think that they are actually ukrainians hahaha, and

the question arises if it is such a deep deep the conviction is deep and it is not only characteristic of russians, the bulgarians said a few days ago that they want to take part in changing the constitution of the republic in the northern academy so that it was written there that bulgarians are one of the states that make up the people of the republic in the north, because what if the republic of northern bidonia bulgaria will not be allowed to join the european union, and they don't just want to write it in north macedonia, they want to stand over their heads and see if it's correct. they didn't write like this how do you like it, bulgarians? this is madness. bulgarians simply can’t attack the northern calen, it’s not our happiness. they are a much more democratic, tolerant country between russia . they don’t want to act militarily, they act with the help of your legal representatives, but it still looks wild. to arms. that we defended our sovereignty, and on the other hand, they oppress the people they consider part

of their own nation. what good will the bulgarians do? if the macedonians are not part of the european union, it will mean that 2 million people who themselves bulgarians believe that bulgarians will not have the opportunities for development that they have because of idiocy. and when the russians bomb kharkiv or odesa or kryvyi rih, where, according to them , russian-speaking people live, this is not schizophrenia only among ukrainians who speak ukrainian , and among ukrainian-speaking russians, well, it’s only schizophrenia yes, it's schizophrenia and the question arises. look, if we see that it's such a national schizophrenia, it's just when you you can start this discussion with the average russians remember that

already after the start of the war, i had such a discussion with a companion of my colleagues who happened to be at the same table with me in montenegro, and when i tried to say something to him, he was with his wife who was from horlovka, which you did not doubt, she was not russian, but she actively supports him and he and i him i say well, well, why are you denying the ukrainians the right to be a people, because i wanted to listen to myself hall, let's drink, it's not even an invitation to the table, it's just such a deep disrespect, you just understand it. i would like to discuss something, well, eat yourself. go ahead and eat. that's it. i'm not sure. i still stand by this point of view that it 's insurmountable. i always say don't try to hope that they will change in this because

it is what it is. if you want this is the platform on which russian statehood stands, one should not think that it is possible to pull this platform out from under their feet, it will not be pulled out , there is only one thing that can be done, to which i always urge to get security, security guarantees, join nato, simply put them before a choice or they believe that they are ready to risk a nuclear war and clearly and absolutely understand that they are attacking here, a nuclear war is starting here and there is no moscow, and either they are simply crying over a cut piece of russia in their own homes, they themselves hold scientific and practical conferences, hold seminars, hold kyiv day , call all the streets by the names of kyiv, kharkiv

odesa publishes books, little russia is annihilated and destroyed пут домой пут yes, this is an honor and let them live with it, let them get sick of it themselves and maybe in 50-60 years i don't think more in 100 we with them, we will be able to talk about the fact that we exist, well, with finns or poles, this happened rather at the end of the existence of the russian empire , in principle, many believed that russians and poles are also one people, only with different religions. well, the russians were already in the 20th year near warsaw i am marshal tokhachevskii in the 39th year, they were near helsinki almost, well, they somehow came to terms with this for various political reasons, neither poland nor finland became soviet republics , well, it took years and the second

world war, changes in economic conditions, and now finland is a member of nato and putin's cries. well, he said something there that it poses a threat, but you know, somehow they changed it because the political plans of the kremlin simply do not include finland's accession. well, let's be honest, well , everyone in moscow knows for sure that nato does not threaten russia, so they are there they didn't say what they were like, they didn't tell tales, they know it, their people know it, they know that they are the most nuclear state in the world, next to the united states, and they know for sure that no one threatens them with anything, the only thing that threatens them incredibly what can really be the end of russia, i'll tell you what it is. hey brother, a little bit. this is the most dangerous thing, this is what can happen, because if russians are allowed to stop marriage, then men will marry men and women will marry women , you have no doubt that there will be no russians, this is my plan

of the west, therefore, if it means imposing it on russia, then this will leave everything so ridiculous, the logic is that you are stronger than nuclear weapons, and nuclear weapons are stronger than this, that is, if you remove the russian e-e originality of marriage as the main threat, everything else is not for the russians for money nothing at all and they know this, that's why they are absolutely right in finland in nato norway was in nato she was in nato all the time and what happened to russia she disappeared well there will be not only norway and denmark but also finland and sweden which are next to norway abroad would know even more if the border were unified well, what are the russian divisions standing on this border, as finland has been standing for years, knowing this is of no importance at all, flight time, if we go exactly to the language of vladimir vladimirovich putin, the flight time of missiles he arrived in st. petersburg for a few seconds. if it is not

minutes less than the flight time of missiles there to st. petersburg from helsinki, it does not change anything at all, because the question is not that they are afraid of nato. the question is that they are afraid that if we become members of nato they will not be able to capture us. this is what they are afraid of the russians. and what do you think that the russians believe in this? well, no, we have already talked with you many times about the fact that they know what is really happening. a nation that simply supports lies and does not want to. it has never done work on uh-uh mistakes , so they never took their crimes seriously . i recently saw a text again in the liberal russian media in which the author wrote that here are the portraits of stalin that in the

70-80s those years began to appear on these in trucks on the glass and i remember with what horror i looked at these cars, as a rule, they came to the ukrainian ssr from somewhere in russia or from georgia, and i think, god, if this is a person, a simple person, i will stick it on my glass portrait of stalin it says that they have not been cured by anything as a nation, that is, the secretary of the central committee of the party did not come with a portrait of stalin, that is the driver of the truck, and i am reading here in this russian text that it is because they are a sign of protest, no, i think that they did not protest, they just liked stalin, protest, well, protest because stalin was, as it were, banned, he was such a great leader, i'm a critic, so instead of levy, they stuck a steel stick on themselves. i think it was clear that they

knew exactly who stalin was, they knew that, well , i won't talk about georgians, and they worked like this the national pride of a small nation that our rosin was the head of such a large empire, the regime still hasn't dismantled the stalin museum at the top, it stands there as it stood, only they didn't write what does this mean, the museum of a man who is guilty of many crimes, but in this soviet exposition, everything was preserved in our native in the city of stalina, on stalina street. i don't know, maybe they have already renamed it. i'm not sure , but when i was there, it was already there. it seems to me that the period under saakashvili is already all saakashvili , nothing to do with it, how was it, it was on stalin's streets, stalin's museum, god is with him, let's leave the georgians alone, because this is their national history and theirs, i said, uh , settle accounts with yourself, but for the russians, it's completely different. and finland will really strengthen nato , of course, finland will very seriously strengthen nato, and even more so, i tell you i will say that nato has strengthened sweden because both of these countries , first of all, they have a fairly strong army in finland, a historically

strong army because they knew very well who they were next to and even their times there were neutrality and so on allowed to have a strong one, they ran especially in the 90s, that is, they always had it because they survived two severe wars and the first winter war, 600,000 people died in it. well, we always say, how did the finns become hitler's allies, how did they become, and how did they became allies with dignity if you were attacked by a big, huge state and you were able to escape from it only by putting 600,000 people. it seems to me that on the front for a small country this is huge, and before that there was a civil war of the definite communists too in the 20s they wanted to win and join finland to soviet russia. that is, it was the second war, not the first, and then there was a war during the second world war, the so-called winter war

, a continuation, and people died everywhere, so they stayed with this complex for the rest of their lives, the swedes did not have that because the swedes stopped fighting somewhere in the time of charles 12. but along with this, they always had the concept of armed neutrality , that is, the swedish army is very strong, one of the best armies in europe, it is stronger than the armies of many other nato members, the swedes they own the island of gotland, which in general gives the possibility of full control over the baltic sea. if you have a military base there, you simply won’t let anyone into the baltic sea. another important point is that the swedish army was already starting to relax a little in the 1970s and 1980s of the 20th century, as the evil soviet presidential submarine sailed directly into the stockholm bay, this is again idiocy , idiocy, not species, for reasons incomprehensible to anyone , sweden was neutral, was not a member of nato , they still

launched their submarines there and after that, if i did not see this a submarine just in the bay of stoholm, there was such a reaction, they increased the military budget several times and from that moment they are developing quite intensively. between the accession of finland and sweden, because if finland entered separately , now finland must legally agree on sweden's accession to nato, and in finland there is a change of government, and so on, and sweden wanted to go to vilnius. finland will carry out this procedure in a week because in finland all the parties represented in the parliament are euro-atlanticists, and the party that will now form

the government is the coalition party and the former leader is the current president of finland, it is the linearists and the sau who are linearists or supporters of joining finland to nato was still in 2000 there in the 10th year of 2014, when the social democrats what kind of power are they leaving now? problems i think that the agreement of finland is just a vote in the parliament that will be confirmed by the president here, turkey is not a question of finland if it is also hungary . i think that hungary will be confirmed to be confirmed by turkey, but regarding turkey, i understand that it is possible that the leadership of nato and the united states have the agreement of the president as reprimand that he will do it after the parliamentary elections, but it is before the summit , then you can't, so you

have such a possibility because it is clear that now the president, with this situation in which he is, is necessary to demonstrate how he protects the national interest in turkey, fights with the kurdish underground, and i think that he is making a mistake because, by and large, if he turns the fight against sweden in nato into a fight against the kurds, then this automatically gives all the kurd votes to the representative of the opposition, and the people's democratic party in turkey , which represents the kursk nationalist party, did not nominate its candidate in the presidential elections, and thus reprimanded that he will seriously insist on the non-admission of sweden, he loses all the kursk voters if now he would agree with sweden's stupidity, he would actually do better not for sweden but for himself , because a certain part of the kurds could be drawn to his side. you see, he conceded. he still respects us, he does not persecute those kurds who forget in shvets. no,

this is irreconcilable position, it mobilizes the nuclear electorate, the problem is that degan has been missing for a long time, yes, he is now lagging behind the opposition candidate, who has kiligzh deregoglu by 10%. i will tell you clearly if now the candidates for the post of president from the opposition had some more charismatic posts, they chose between mayors of istanbul and anchors, but both of them for various reasons cannot run for office. i think that now there was a bartekhada , he was a lunatic. 20-30% is the maximum, and he is. it is amazing, in general, a person with such a political flair. i would say that he does everything it is possible to bury oneself, well, i don’t understand, that’s it, one day you have to write a book about the last years of evdogan , who when he came to power was brilliant , absolutely brilliant, both in economic reforms and in the way he changed society and in

the work of society and the fact that he took advantage of the nostalgia of provincial turkey for this turkey before the tatsur period , that is, the people who wanted to be respected there with their religious views, who were actually unmarried since the time of mustafa kemal, suddenly felt themselves to be people whose interests they defend themselves, which they hear, and it is close to economic growth, i will say that i was in turkey dorn and i was in turkey - it is different methodical and turkey of skyscrapers in istanbul and dad things on modern ankara and that turkey of modern trains and that is simple very huge changes and here suddenly there was a moment it seemed as if it was no longer reprimand double cardigans reprimand somewhere they stole and planted a person who looked like him who began to finish off the turkish economy, then began

to fight for regional hegemony without having real resources for this, then began to run between states and in russia, why did money play a role here? they began to steal, instead of investing in their country, investing at the same time. you know what an ideal option is, because it almost never happens otherwise. the problem of staying in power for a long time is already absolutely obvious that a long stay in power changes the psyche and a person loses the sense of novelty, you understand with politics uh , it's like with intimate life and that you do one thing for a very long time and thereby lose your sharpness at the moment it seems that everything is very simple and everything will be like this, and then it turns out that you are not right , you know how all divorces happen, that it turns out that what is wrong and you think that everything is like this, nothing has changed, that is, in politics, you also have to

leave on time well, there is a wonderful influence of me, angel merkel, who was democratically elected as the chancellor of germany, a chancellor who was considered a symbol of the stability of all the other positive development of the country, and in the last period of her activity there was the impression that she simply lost her understanding of reality, or are they one and the same desire to somehow leave for 17 years . she was written but after all, angels , merkel was limited to the tracks of the coalition, she was all the time with someone, the coalition was never at the desk, and this one did not exist , this did not exist, media, critical articles, reports councilors wrote it, it was written by voters who vote for different political forces, and all the same, all these safety devices did not work until the end, and now imagine

a cardigan, the opposition has played a marginal role in recent years, especially after this failed attempt at a military coup, journalists could be arrested to say that they are supporters of helen and put him in prison for 10-15 years report i think only complimentary absolutely believe that without him his party is worthless quarrel with his closest associates after all, people who the ordagans worked as prime ministers for the first time in terms of video management, they were quite strong and mobile politicians were even the president of the turks for the first time. they all quarreled over a vegan. he is surrounded by completely different people than the moment he came to power, this also says a lot, only dangerous a warm bath that a politician creates for himself, a politician who is a simpleton in a warm bath, this is putin, vladimir volodymyrovych. he just doesn't get out of it, you know, you only

breathe through solomyansk, and it's a tragedy , you understand when people live in such a world that's why i always believe that i'm in power, that i changed this restriction. this is an important thing. it's impossible to be the head of the state or government for more than 10 years. by the way , we talked with igor the philosopher about the blonde, that's also a great example. today, lukashenko is a completely different person. by the way, lukashenko has always been so true, but he simply turned into a monster, so it is interesting why lukashenko travels to moscow so often, can you explain it? well, what are they discussing there? now, god forbid, i think he is trying to convince him of something , the idea is that lukashenka has completely lost control over the situation in his own country, it is wrong, he is losing control, but

he is resisting, and that is precisely why he is resisting , and they are calling him to moscow regarding the war in ukraine, they want or a pro-union state , are you raising the issue of the war in ukraine again , the most important question and in any case , he can be used as a diplomatic mediator? this story with nuclear weapons arose, he can go somewhere else to talk about weapons so that russian politicians do not do it where they can refuse, if in this plan he is a useful person for putin, besides, all this nonsense from lukashenka should show russians that a union state is being built if not from ukraine, although with belarus you understand, because belarus is actually a mirror of what they would like to do with ukraine, in fact, putin would like to sit next to lukashenko, he wanted to sit next to lukashenko, even before him, medvedchuk traveled like this, well, in the role of the president of ukraine, this would be a normal life, and medvedchuk should be, but since

medvedchuk is not the president of ukraine , and it is not known what his name is, he has to spend his time lukashenka, you know it happens . this is lukashenka 's statement. france, after meeting with the dolphin regarding the deployment of nuclear weapons outside the borders of the countries that possess them, that this is unacceptable, said macron and emphasized that russia must adhere to its international obligations, what lukashenko said, i agree with him, that is why it is necessary to withdraw all nuclear weapons to the americans from the five or six countries where they are located , period . destroy that's all, i hope it's not on public territory, or the wind, the clothes on the barakhovka, or that it would look like being a billionaire, that in endelbert she couldn't look like a billionaire, that she was

the modest wife of a soviet employee without money, palaces at all, no private property, nothing, and russians in general remind me of such a galician cannibal . i think that these authors, well, by the way, they were from odesa, that they understood russian well in general, all these complexes that they are through petrov. they accurately described the image of the real russia is so mysterious, the russian soul is not mysterious, it is the soul of a christmas tree, a man-eater who just wants to catch up with america, she runs after this america all the time on bad heels, and you can’t understand why she can’t