[000:00:00;00] as a result, we get this pysanochka. every year, the koziv school organizes a master class for all willing young people, immigrants, tourists, and famous pysankars join in. they paint eggs together and continue the traditions of the hutsul region. of that work, it was a little lost , but our institution has exactly that goal, that is, each of the works that we perform is born here, it is created here, and it is always an original time of globalization and unification of values ​​​​for the gadgetization of youth, it is especially important to attract young people to manual craft art, some

of which are on the verge of extinction, and we believe that this is one of our main responsibilities today. experts tell the exhibitions , easter eggs often travel around the world from kosovo to barcelona, ​​milan or paris . prykarpattia for the espresso tv channel, this is all the information for this hour, the updated issue will be at 11:00, then we will meet yehorch rynda and anna valevska. it is difficult to talk about what you feel when you have urinary incontinence , an unpleasant situation can arise at any time, even with a slight effort luckily - that's behind me uro feminost helped me thanks to the natural ingredients uro feminost helps

to restore control of urination in the melon at night now i feel confident that uro feminost urination is under control this was me before bleeding gums inflammation of the gums and the solution was so simple gum problems lacalut active lacalut active actively overcomes bleeding gums protects against periodontitis and visibly tightens clear lacalut active action you feel immediately nk lacalut active plus even more active protection the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians victory and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics , serhii rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this, people who have information and

shape public opinion, people who defend ukraine and create the future right now the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict of serhiy rudenko from monday to thursday at 1:00 p.m. repeat at 6:00 p.m. we continue our broadcast and remind you about raising funds for poseidon for the adam tv program it is hosted by our colleague, the host of the espresso tv channel iryna koval in we are collected on a drone in sequence for the combined tactical group adam reconnaissance uav of this type this is an effective reconnaissance work adjusting the protection of the personnel of the operators a huge number of enemy losses and the enemy combined tactical group adam is currently holding the defense in the bakhmut direction, the commander of the group, the hero of ukraine, the legendary tankist yevgeny and mezhevikin e fighters on the first not the first month give a decent rebuff to the enemy in donetsk region at the beginning of the full-scale invasion adam fighters adam

participated in the liberation of kyiv and kharkiv regions join the collection required amount four million hryvnias collected 2 million 545 000 uah 906 89 kop requisites you see on your screens glory to ukraine death to enemies zhornakov co-founder and chairman of the board of the de jure foundation mykhaila good day, congratulations you should be held by the supreme council of justice. this is how we understand it today. explain, bring clarity. and what should be there, what is the situation ? well, the higher qualification commission of the studio should take place. in fact , it is already being formed by the supreme council of justice. within the framework of the reforms that we need to carry out in order to start the process of joining the european union, this

will be evaluated by the supreme council of justice is one body, the highest qualification commission of judges is the second that we need to do, and this is all under number two is among the very requirements that we have to fulfill. we will be evaluated on the readiness of our e literally in a month , in may, and it is clear that at that moment we need to show a real result. and now there is a huge problem in that the supreme council of justice has been updated, allegedly on friday evening, she announced that not only will interviews with candidates for the post of the supreme field commission of judges not be broadcast, i currently have 32 finalists, 16 of them must be selected, this is actually the task of the supreme council of justice, and them in general they will not let journalists or the public into the hall even to see how it is happening, it is shameful and it contradicts the previous practice of probably all selections for top positions or mostly the majority. at least since the time of the revolution of dignity, this is also creating an international scandal, in fact, because the call to open the interviews was called by

the ambassadors of itself in its address on thursday the day before and here on friday the supreme council of justice says that it will not broadcast , let's sit still and not empty anyone at all. that is, it is a very strange reaction, honestly, i don't remember if the judicial bodies are even much less reformed, the current supreme council of justice is allowed to do so. well, the most interesting thing is that, as far as we know, the supreme council of justice has not made such a decision. someone got to the facebook page and it is not clear who, and we still hope for a quick reaction and to the fact that you are still the council of justice today will still publish what well , some official version from myself because otherwise i will repeat myself an international scandal awaits us and a very poor assessment of progress just to you are in the european union now, so someone there stole the passwords and wrote on their behalf , and what is the reason, i am not trolling, look at this, as far as

we know, we communicated with more than one member of the supreme council of justice on friday and saturday after this happened to us it was confirmed that the council as such did not make such a decision. that is, it is literally someone, uh, volunteer . i'm sorry, he went on behalf of the supreme council of justice . i started this. i still hope that he will have the wisdom not to follow this to the supreme council of justice, but to correct himself and open an interview mykhailo, well, the formal explanation is the provision of equality for all participants, so to speak, selection , but suddenly the same questions will be asked to those contestants who will be the first to enter this competition, and the finalists, those who will go to the last, will already know the answers to these question how

much is it? well, how much is it? yes , how much is it. maybe even thousands who were interviewed by the vkks to the nabu to the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office to the constitutional court, you can continue to list, list from no one, i have not heard how much we have been following this for several years, that this puts them in some kind of wrong conditions, here comes the supreme council of justice and for they decide that they are not in such conditions. well, this is absurd, friend. i do not believe that the intellectual level of the members of the supreme council of justice does not allow them to diversify these issues. the color of the commission of judges that they choose soon to choose about 2 1/2 thousand judges for vacant positions, and that is the number for today . tell them also that everything is closed. god forbid that someone will find out about some question that was asked and maybe someone will ask it in the future, well, this is absurd the truth is that there is no problem at all, and this non-existent problem will be solved by justice at the expense of the fact that

it will completely kill trust in the results of the competition , and it will also harm and has already harmed ukraine at the international level, mr. mykhailo in may, the eu will provide an interim report on the readiness of our country to start joining the eu, and we remember the homework that was for us. well, judicial reform is key, in fact , you mentioned this interim report , what can we say now in terms of pros and cons have completed that task how are we ready for this report and the next step look here i announce our product together with partners that we are doing it is called a candidate or what we have already released three pieces fourth now we are working on it for in order to comprehensively and professionally assess all points, i do not undertake to speak for other areas, and i am not an expert

, but progress is being made. the superficiality of the law on personal reform, which, by the way, are the first and second points in this matter, among the eighty-seven and the first is the constitutional court, and there is also a scandalous story when our government refused and still refuses to make changes to the law that would have provided for the participation of the seventh member in to a group of experts from international partners that selects judges of the constitutional court, despite the fact that the eu has repeatedly called for this publicly and from the supreme council of justice with the highest qualification commission of judges. well, he will not do anything adequate, he will not open interviews, this will create a problem both in the evaluation of the vrp itself and in the evaluation of the selection process of the higher commission of courts, that is, if we do not solve these issues

by the 18th, when will the evaluation be officially in may, well, it will be a huge problem for the admission procedure regarding the overall quality of the current composition of the supreme council of justice . 9,000 dollars and for the period of the investigation it was proposed that the vrp suspend only the menu we voted three members of the vrp for suspension 17 against well and you compared compared this story with the vote for suspension of the vovka judges, who is there after the films, do you remember the vovka film, they also proposed to suspend him then 14 members were against the vrp , not a single hall, you said you asked a rhetorical question, how much does the new version differ

from the old one at 3:17 different , that is, some kind of movement is going on, but in general, the price does not affect the situation, since neither vovka nor this tetyana ilyiva was even suspended in general, how correct is this comparison of these two votes and your assessment of the qualitative renewal of the composition of the vrp, please, look at me to ask about my words, how correct are they? i think they are correct, because uh, the difference is like that, today there are 17 members, then there were 14, what then, today there were 14 against well, today there were days ago, but only three were the plant, three are members of the supreme council justice that does not care what the judicial system looks like because it is a powerful signal, in fact, in this system , see the judge is reasonably suspected of committing such a crime in the removal of assets . by the way, this is not the first time that this has happened to

her. the picture is very simple, this is good. of course, the supreme council of justice in all kinds of decisions about their consent to their arrest or when a person is no longer in ukraine and there in absentia about detention and if the judge babenko understands that this person well, it is no longer in the system , it does not affect anything, and such a decision does not change the status quo , what do we expect from the supreme council of justice? the system that you can no longer withdraw money is not justified, you can no longer make decisions that contradict the law, you cannot have a pile of unexplained property and simply continue to be in office, and i will repeat it again. this same suspension for a couple of months is literally the opening of justice to a criminal punishment, it is not even a disciplinary sanction in the form of dismissal , it is simply suspended for two months so that this person does not harm the authority of the judiciary

while an investigation is being conducted against him, and nevertheless it is not even the highest standard of justice did, we have already repeatedly said that we will look at two things , first of all, about when we will evaluate whether the reform took place or whether the supreme council of justice took place, because the result of the selection well, it is not very clear-cut, to say the least, of the very members themselves the supreme council of justice had problems, and the litmus test will be, as we said a long time ago, the selection of the supreme qualification commission of judges and specific decisions on specific judges. of this communication with these strange decisions that no one allegedly made and secondly, well, there are huge questions that arise regarding the signals that the updated supreme council of justice gives to the rest of the systems is still a prank that everything will change , but it is the members of the supreme council of justice who have to change it because otherwise it will have to be stated that the reform of the supreme council

of justice did not take place and it is necessary to start again, returning to the selection to the composition of the communist party of ukraine , you mentioned the 30 32 semi-finalists conditionally and the finalists who made it to the final, now the final the selection of them should be 16 selected, what kind of personalities are there, how many candidates are adequate, and how many candidates are there with such a train, not very good for future members of the communist party of the soviet union, please, here it is very important, in fact , the 32 finalists among them are many worthy candidates, moreover, among them there are even more than 16 very worthy, what does this mean, it means that statistically, even if we just take like that and i don't know what 16 darts we have in the list, we will have a good composition. simply, if we just randomly choose er, 16 members but of course the task of the supreme council of justice is not to choose

randomly, to choose the best, and here under the conditions that, after all , the people still do not trust the judiciary very much, that there were problems about the elections of the supreme council of justice and so on and so on obvious the solution is to open the site as much as possible so that everyone is convinced that there are no manipulations, that they choose the best , that none of the good ones are rejected at interviews, that none of the dubious ones are pulled out at interviews, and so on. what is the supreme council of justice doing, closing everything, not allowing anyone in? the public, no journalists at the meeting, why is this being done? well, i have only one answer in order to hide as much as possible the fact that they will choose the worst and not the best . that is the same answer, well, practically everyone who follows the process. therefore, it may be wrong. i will be wrong. i i will be very happy to be wrong, but for this the supreme council of justice must open up everything and show, look, we are not doing any manipulations, so then the supreme council of justice will be given

the most positive evaluations and selection above the qualification of the commission of judges and by us and international partners and i will repeat it again, the biggest problem for me is that it is not only that it was done closed, but also that such a decision was allegedly made or not made by us. it is clear. but it was published, but this one was it was published even after your taja seven , where it is directly stated, please open it because it is fundamentally important for the further movement of ukraine and it is well, it is true, an international scandal. if this does not change today, and the vrp does not come out of communication, they did not make any such decision mykhailo and who will state that the judicial reform has not taken place in our country and then we will have to start the process again, this should be followed by sevens, these are our partners. who will say this? it should be ukrainian society . look here, there are two dimensions. the opening of accession negotiations, and by the way, it is not excluded that for various reasons

, political, geopolitical , etc. 16 members of the supreme council of the high qualified commission of judges will open negotiations, but if there is no rule of law in the country, the country will never be admitted to the european union. it is obvious that we have an example of other countries of the european union that do not have the rule of law, unfortunately for today which create enormous problems within brussels, this and other capitals are so fed up that they are close to admitting to membership a country that has at least problems with the rule of law, so it is so short and urgent. maybe even this will affect the e-e won't fundamentally affect the general e on let's say yes to the decisions that are made right today now the next month but god forbid such trends will go on and on and everything will be

upgraded and not developed then eh well it will simply put a cross on all of our from european perspectives, this is the choice of the eu, our internal dimension, because, well, not only for formal membership of the eu, but in general . we do all this and not only the whole country, our heroes are fighting in the east, in the south, on others in other regions, they are fighting back armed aggression not in order for us to be the same as in russia, uh, well, unable to build the rule of law, but in order for us to be a normal , civilized country, so here we are, ukrainian society, community, public organizations, journalists, businessmen, volunteers, volunteers, uh, veterans, we have to give an answer whether it happened or not , and the answer will be obvious, mr. mykhailo . at the end of last year, you talked about the fact that the people of andrii portnov are trying to maintain control over the ukrainian courts. andrii portnov, who was the chief lawyer. well

first there in the headquarters of yulia tymoshenko, then viktor yanukovych, now here are the first months of the 23rd year, they somehow changed the situation in a certain way, or is this an attempt to control it succeeds in a certain way on the part of the team of people of the tailor who and who these people are, it is interesting because andriy portnov has been wanted for a long time in running outside of ukraine, see uh, he ran in for a long time, not about official positions, but still uh , his influence, let's say, he exists and the agony of this judicial mafia continues if we look at the centers of his influence , the main center of his influence is protecting the administrative court of the city of kyiv was recently liquidated. and for that, a big thank you, in fact, to our political authorities . unfortunately, 20 months, exactly 20 months passed from the moment the urgent presidential bill was introduced in the verkhovna rada to its vote on liquidation. thank god at least it was voted on and now well, those who understand inside the judicial system what happened, they understand that it has already

been lost forever clicked and let's say that the times will return but there are those who continue to dream about this past during the time of yanukovych, when the judges reigned indiscriminately, took tons of bribes, and nobody could say anything . they were the masters of life, it will not be like this , the judge is not virtuous, i mean, they have to plan. is in the system, but now what we are observing, i am sure, is the influence of those , let's say, more hidden cells and people inside the system who still dream of the return of yanukovych portnov and for this purpose they keep trying as much as possible even under the conditions of reforms, create such new bodies that in fact will not be new, that will fill the ukrainian judicial system further with cadres of yanukovych's porter, other, such, and similar