[000:00:00;00] in the first place, people do not fully realize that the church they go to is hostile and belongs to the kremlin and works for the kremlin, why these bloody events that have taken place over the last year and in general during the last nine years, why are people not convinced that everything from moscow is hostile, the state simply didn't work with it, they were afraid to touch it. we remember how the law on drips. i don't know , it was probably submitted five times, and in particular , only in the last convocation, i was its author, we adopted it because they wanted to what should these churches do that do not work for the russian federation? they worked in the army , and many of them, in particular , did not want to vote directly. well, we have direct parishioners of this church before the war

. already said on the air that he even spoke at the committee about the fact that this is not the moscow patriarchate, it is properly a church, and there let's close this issue. he was a parishioner, then what kind of job should it be called if we have these at the highest level the churches were supported, that's why no work was carried out, we keep such problems at the beginning of the war. if the system was conducted directly, then i think that we have not had this problem for a long time, one of those points , except for bahmut, obviously, taking into account the chain to which the whole world was and still is crimea, because in all negotiations and all conversations about the future of peace or the future of ukraine and russia, a special place is given to crimea, we know that putin says that this is the territory of russia, so we are ready

to defend ourselves there with any weapon, we also know that there were several applications during the last year, in particular, the head of the main intelligence directorate of the ministry of defense, budanov, that we would be in the crimea by the summer, then podolyak predicted that in 5-7 months we would be in the crimea, is it possible? can you hint that a counteroffensive is being prepared. well, it must lead one way or another to the fact that ukraine will nevertheless begin the deoccupation of crimea . well, we must be optimistic. and we must also be realistic , so i will say that i do not know what data budano and podolyak rely on that many experts i talk to say this, they do not believe that this counteroffensive will lead to, let's say, well , by the time they said there by the summer that we will occupy crimea by the summer. seeing our resources, we understand that the counteroffensive

still needs to be successfully carried out, and the counteroffensive does not always mean victory, and our counteroffensive is even more so because we understand what forces the russian federation has, it can put us to a more favorable position than now, this would be on the condition that it is successfully carried out, and people must be told the truth that there is still a lot of work ahead, and you are inferior to the deoccupation of the left bank of the kherson region, and in particular crimea, and crimea directly will be much more difficult because there are other people already there. let's say so brainwashed for 8 years and there will not be such a de-occupation as was the case in the kherson region, where in fact they met us, you saw how it would be there , sometimes in a different way, sometimes there would be many russians there during this time they settled our people were forced to leave there, that's why there will be many problems, we need to work, work now, and believe that victory will make some predictions. i think this is only

deceiving ourselves . we will be realistic. we will believe in the armed forces of ukraine. thank you , colonel, for the conversation. friends of ukraine, we work live and are now on youtube and facebook, for those who are currently watching us live, you can like on these platforms, subscribe to our platforms on youtube, on facebook, others on social networks, remember that we work for you 24 hours a day, seven days a week, read our news on the espresso tv website , operational information from ukraine, the world, as well as the front chronicle, everything is on our website, in addition , you can become our sponsor is a sponsor of the youtube channel espresso, now on the screen you can see qr-codes, by clicking on which

you will receive detailed instructions on how to join our respected society of sponsors of people who help us develop the youtube channel and create new ones projects on youtube well, while we are waiting for the inclusion of our second guest, i want to quote the president of brazil, who said that western countries entered the war very quickly in order to start peace negotiations, luula da silva says that for the sake of peace, ukraine could, in principle , give russia the occupied crimea. well, you see the topic of crimea, friends, it sounds uh-uh from different platforms from different rostrums and uh, the president of brazil, by the way, which country that is part of the bricks association, including the russian

federation, insists that ukraine abandon its claims to crimea. such a way it would be possible to reach some kind of peace agreement. we also know that the ukrainian leadership is determined, as a result of the counteroffensive and counteroffensive actions, to go to the borders of august 24, 1991, where it is clearly recorded that crimea is ukrainian territory . there are differences about how crimea should return to of ukraine and in what terms and obviously it is obvious that now this issue is being discussed on international platforms i think that in private or at least not public negotiations and we will talk about this with the diplomat and the permanent representative of ukraine at the united nations in 2015-2019 and extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador

of ukraine to the united states of america in 2020-21 volodymyr yelchenko mr. volodymyr good day good health to you thank you for joining our broadcast good day mr. serhiy mr. volodymyr we have already started and continued our conversation that we started with roman kostenko regarding the future of crimea is the statement of the president of brazil, lula da silva, who said that in order for there to be peace and for peace negotiations to begin, ukraine must to cede crimea and to accept that for the sake of peace, ukraine must give russia the occupied crimea, e.e., taking into account the fact that brazil is among such a circle of friends of the russian federation, can this be considered the kremlin's entreaties to ukraine for peace

talks? and the condition that they constantly put forward crimea - it should still remain under the russian federation well, you know, i would not rule out a certain role of the russian federation here , but i would not so openly consider brazil an ally or some kind of close partner of russia, er, not closer than dozens eh, from the states eh, even though brazil is included in the brics, eh, but they are very different calibers kaminny i would say, that is, it is still far from being some kind of union in the name of the russian federation well, what about the president of brazil well, i would like to advise eh. well, read more such useful literature and about ukraine, and even better , visit our country, visit buch , irpin, or at least even kyiv, and then he saw completely different things, that is, this negativity

that he spreads. well, you know that it seems to me that it is not presented in the right light . such a serious, well, strong country as brazil is an authoritative country. it seems to me that there is another problem . brazil, that's exactly what is being pushed into the right regulations. well, maybe the embassy is not working properly. we don't have any ambassadors now. i don't know when he will be appointed. and secondly, um, well, very much. i would say there is no role for the ukrainian diaspora, because i remember i was forced to communicate many leaders of the ukrainian convention committee and the world congress of ukrainians and they always spoke with such pride that we have such a strong diaspora in

brazil, there are several members of parliament at the level of individual subjects of brazil and we need administrative units, there are influential ukrainians i have a question, where are these influential ukrainians, that is, i would advise the world congress of ukrainians to also pay attention to this , because it was not presented to brazil , after all, considering the role of this country , to take such a position is absolutely not in the morning and for this, it is necessary to work with the year of brazil with the president of russia . moreover, he is an experienced person, even though the war recently became the president. these are absolutely clumsy proposals regarding ukraine at a time when the president of brazil offers ukraine to give up crimea , russian propagandists are preparing for

a counteroffensive on crimea mykhailo khodaryonok - this is a military observer and a colonel of the armed forces of the russian federation on the air of skabeev and listed the objects that should be hit by the armed forces of ukraine - this is the crimean bridge, airfields, ships, in one word, look. as for crimea, these eight do not cancel possible strikes by the ukrainian armed forces on objects on the territory of the peninsula, they will clearly be in among the priority ones, the krymsky bridge includes all other communications, which are considered to be the delivery of material means, and the jagrodrom network, the control points, and the ships of the black sea fleet at anchorage in the parking lots, all the forces and means of the ukrainian side will be used to strike these sensitive objects

. it seems to me, vladimir, that this is a gift. to the development of such a scenario, we know that nuclear weapons are tactical nuclear weapons, in particular, we know that medvedev has repeatedly said that if ukraine approaches the peninsula, such a scenario is possible. i wanted to ask about medvedev, including you, in the context of the question about the crimean peninsula, because medvedev wrote on twitter that ukraine is never of interest to him and that it will disappear altogether. you were in your country in the russian federation and presented with a certificate of faith. as far as i know dmitry to medvedev, he was still pretending and demonstrating this inadequacy

of his or playing the role of an inadequate person, i repeatedly wrote my opinion about medvedev on facebook and on twitter , do you remember his phrases there about the fact that eh, нет денег но выдержитель eh-eh then he somewhere, two or three years ago, the advice of ukrainians was to come to terms with the fact that crimea will never return to ukraine . nothing depends on the child. in response , i advised medvedev to remember that he himself has been in russia for a long time. doesn't solve anything, but probably this delusion of grandeur that he has left over from those times when he was the so-called president of russia, although in fact he just kept sagittarius for putin until the next term. wrong experienced politician no but he chose for himself such a funny role of a clown and well, if he likes

it, well, let him continue. i think that you know in ukraine it is, well , it has been a long time since i became the subject of men and yolks. that is, we just laugh about it. i think that in the western world everyone is looking at this. well, it’s a little surprising, but why did they choose a person to play such a role, let him play it like that , and with regard to crimea, mr. volodymyr, is it the expulsion of the russian occupiers from the crimean peninsula , or will this be equivalent to the fact that the policy of putin and the current russian government is simply will undergo a complete fiasco if the russians are squeezed out of there and removed by the armed forces of ukraine , i am absolutely sure of this, you know, for good reason, many political scientists believe that the topic of crimea is so sacred for, first of all, it will be the russian leadership, but also for the russian people

also, well, who was shouted at by this leadership for these nine years before the fact that crimea did not always return to the russian federation, so it will be very serious for them, such a moral and emotional blow. i think that the russian authorities will definitely he is not worried, but you know , well, you know too much of a great empire, how would he not represent it in the foreground, and in this regard, i agree with your previous guest , roman kostenko, who still calls for more, you know so calmly and thoughtfully about this system, of course, you and i are military experts. we cannot make predictions about what and when the counteroffensive of the armed forces of ukraine will end, that it will end with the complete ousting of the russians from crimea, but let's give time to our military and our leadership

to the political, military and political ones, let them do their thing. well, we ukrainians will of course support it in every possible way, but i repeat once again that it will be, well, such an insignificant blow to russia from all points of view, morally , politically, militarily, well, it will be the beginning end of russia in the form in which it is recorded during the last two weeks . nuclear weapons eh then eh lukashenko himself eh lukashenko the self-proclaimed president of the republic of belarus spoke in front of the national mountains and explained the logic of his actions , then lukashenko flew to putin for a meeting today eh flew shoigu to eh

lukashenka himself on the subject-specific conversation reported by the belarusian mass media to ensure security and guarantees for belarusians from russia in the event of aggression against belarus. by the way, i offer a small fragment to watch as dmitry piskov, putin's press secretary told about how, at the invitation of putin, lukashenko came to moscow and visited the apartment of the president of the russian federation, because this is actually also a telling story in this great military -political novel of two aggressors. the president of russia invited a belarusian colleague to the same apartment in which setimpin invited him, but this time and this time

, as far as i know, he invited me. said it is a very big secret, was lukashenko in putin's apartment, all these actions of the maneuver that we are now observing , language, they took place already after the visit of siedenpin to moscow, and it seems that according to the reaction of china , it is obvious that putin's intention to place tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus was unexpected is it true? do you still think that what is happening now and the weapons of which putin lukashenko will overwhelm even putin near europe, near the european union and nato countries , is after all their improvisation? i still i think that it was unexpected, maybe some hints were made in moscow, sir, everyone, but i don’t think that it was so direct, that is, he

clearly did not expect such mockery of the regime of nuclear danger. i want to say that in principle, then lukashenko is playing with fire because, well, the nuclear weapons research agreement of 1968, he was already breathing incense for the last years or decades, this is me, one program of iran and north korea, israeli nuclear weapons and the so-called threshold nuclear countries that are already over a dozen if on 20 which actually for you can have nuclear weapons for a few months, this is also egypt and saudi arabia , malaysia and vietnam, indonesia, well, many can be called the same, japan, south korea , that is, i also. well, it categorically contradicts the spirit and the letter of this agreement

. well, maybe less to the letter than to the spirit, but after the clarifications of this step from the ukrainian and belarusian side began, for the fact that uh, this is no longer a displacement, it is a transfer of nuclear weapons tactically into the hands of belarus. and this is a direct violation of paragraph 1 or article 1 of this treaty. it is very short. you can find literally two pages of it on the internet. you can read it there in direct text. it says that this is a violation of the treaty and i am sure that the reaction of other nuclear countries it may still be asymmetric. it may be different, but i have no doubt that it will be, because how can i explain why nuclear security in the world actually rests on this treaty and the fact that it is already very very difficult and in fact stopped working precisely because of the last review conference of the countries of this treaty, which take place

every five years, uh, at one of them . russia's step is very much disliked by everyone, including china, by the way , which is also one of the pillars of this nuclear proliferation regime, and the chinese understand it very well. you know, he experienced very hard the fact that india and france essentially became nuclear states although they are not members of this treaty, to a lesser extent, pakistan is because it is an ally of china, but india is a direct adversary in china and, well , he also experienced this, and if now nuclear weapons start, tell me about it further, that is, japan is the same, south korea is china, not a bit. although i am not talking about malaysia on the internet, that is, i think that china will give everything

in order to somehow prevent this, and that is why such steps are being taken. then, well, they actually deploy or transfer nuclear weapons belarus, which had previously changed for this purpose its constitution. well, it’s simple. there are no lessons learned from it. so i think that there will still be a reaction, well, china’s reaction. it has already happened. we have heard it, and i think that if there was still some chance , putin still had a chance to bring china to his side . literally, for example, there is help with weapons in the war against ukraine, these chances are already simple well, volodymyr, to what extent is there a chance to drag china to the side of the light forces, that is, to the side of the civilized west and ukraine , including why i ask because after the visit of emmanuel

macron and e- actually, there weren't any left such answers, clear answers. will china influence and can influence russia in this war, but the fact that the world and europe can influence china is absolutely obvious, because the entire economy is tied to either the united states of america or european countries and ursula's visit to the derblain foundation says that in principle it should have been. the conversation was still about the fact that if china does not hold back, then at least it should help. all calls to persuade or influence putin putin, for example, should not buy oil, which the russian federation is now very actively selling to china. in fact, it will destroy the russian economy in order to inevitably lead to the collapse

of the russian federation. i do not think that it will be realistic to hope or expect. will china completely take our side or the side of the civilized world, as i think it is correct to say that for the world, for the western countries of the european union, first of all, and for the involved united states of america, the main thing is to cement neutrality, it seems to me that neutral china is much more useful, well, even in the sense of a certain mediation. we can criticize that chinese customs plan as much as we want. in general, i will believe that there is neither peace nor plans in this plan. nevertheless, this is the word of china. china is it. it is one of the world leaders, it is a respectable, serious country and a lot depends on its position, and that is why china's neutrality is, well, that realism. i think that we need

to write and e and work further and directly and through our partners in brussels and washington, first of all, to ensure that what is in china remains at such a level positions the fact is that china is equally strongly, well, not equally, but strongly depends on the one hand on russian natural resources, primarily energy, and on the other hand, on the volume and trade with the western world. i will remind you that the volume of china's trade for for the european union and the united states, it seems to be more than one trillion dollars. and with all 100 billion, well, this is absolutely not a comparison of, well, let's say so valuable or large, and that's why i think that china will never go to an open consultation with the west because it is dependent on them economically him you have to sell your goods somewhere, without this, the chinese economy will simply drag on, and on the other hand, in order to produce these goods

, he needs all the cheap and relatively cheap ones that he takes from the russian federation , and these are things not only there, oil and gas, but also wood and many other things and for another reason, china will also never leave the existing equipment with equipment, that is why i say and believe that such a neutral position of his is the most realistic and the most attractive for all poles, let's say his conflict with volodymyr to you for the conversation. this was volodymyr yelchenko, diplomat and permanent representative of ukraine at the un in 2015-2020. friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel and also on our social networks. we are now on youtube and facebook so that this video is promoted in the trends of social

networks, please like this video , subscribe to our pages, and don't forget that you can become a sponsor of the espresso youtube channel, now you will see qr-codes by clicking on which you can join the prestigious club of sponsors youtube channel espresso we will be grateful for any help on this friends i put a full stop and say goodbye to you see you tomorrow until 13:00 i wish you all good health take care of yourself and your loved ones bye watch one fourth of the champions league matches man city vs

bayern and real madrid vs. chelsea, the loudest matches exclusively on megogo fm halychyna will be aired and also reflected, well, what february is affected by your cyber such radio fm halychyna has prepared its answer and we heard our armed forces promised a spring counteroffensive to the occupier, so did radio fm halychyna get ready for an informational spring counterattack, hear and even see life goes on, the war is going on, galicia is not enough for the russians, for the ukrainians, spotlight ukraine, a new project of the espresso channel, a project about the war and ukraine, spotlight ukraine, a product that does better, journalists and experts inform, analyze, forecast, spot, like, ukraine, exclusive interviews with foreign guests, politicians, diplomats, economists

, military people, ukraine is the key to how we will live in the next few years , ukraine is with volodymyr ostapchuk every sunday at 9:00 p.m. on espresso, a big broadcast of vasyl zima . my name is vasyl zima. two hours of air time until 9:00 p.m. two hours of your time . out there in the world to talk about yuri the physicist for two hours to be aware of the economic news of radio operators oleksandr borshchagivtsi he tells us about the economy during the war and new sports yevhen pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of favorite presenters about culture under during the war, lena is ready to speak, or other presenters who have become so familiar to many, maybe the weather will give us some optimism , mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us , as well as distinguished guests of the studio, we will have

volodymyr gryshko today, if all goes well , the events of the day in two hours, a big broadcast of vasyl zima a project for smart and caring people in the evening nay espresso greetings to all who are from espresso. time to learn about the most important events at this moment. i'll start. here's how 24 children abducted by the russians during the occupation of kherson region were returned to they were met by the head of the regional military administration, oleksandr prokudin, in their native land. he noted that it was one of the most difficult rescue missions, because the russian security forces interrogated the children and their relatives for 13 hours , and later forced them to participate in propaganda filming, but now the children are at home with their families earlier about the return