[000:00:00;00] well, i agree with you here, i think it is necessary to talk with metropolitan onuphrius himself. what were his motives for giving some kind of description from the side? well, it is possible in the peace of the metropolitan himself, what do you think? how many people of the uoc of the moscow patriarchate have passports of the russian federation? opinion well, i think that those who lived at one time and studied in russia in theological schools, er, added , until the 90s, i think that they had citizenship, passports of the russian federation, and what percentage ratio is it difficult of course answer i think that the migration service should answer this question, we understand you less dual citizenship is prohibited in ukraine and he and everyone else had to make a choice either russian

citizenship or a temporary e-e there e-e temporary residence permit then there is no ukrainian citizenship in ukraine, and they obviously, we all understand why do i condemn a sin by itself, but i love a sinner, so we also have a phrase that is , i cannot condemn a person if i do not clearly know, i have it there is no dual citizenship well, as a fact of dual citizenship, of course, i also condemn the fact that someone received this citizenship very recently, someone received it and does not want to give it up. anyway, no matter what happens, here i agree with you absolutely, but specifically, give specific facts, and name them i can't name specific names because i simply don't know them, or maybe it can't be and shows us such a figure as vadym novinsky, who also seems to have not lost his russian citizenship after acquiring ukrainian, that's the impression

, that's easy to say about this personality, well, but it it seems to me that personality is no less important in er. i would say in action in the actions of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate than the synod, therefore, in such a case, if it is proven that he has dual citizenship, he should be deprived of ukrainian citizenship, let him continue to do what he i was engaged and i wonder how much of this news reporter also kept his russian passport, we will now learn about many deputies who , it turns out, received the citizenship of ukraine and how they retained the citizenship of the russian federation, but besides that, it is important somewhere in the church it is not the passport that is important, as you understand, it is the soul that is important, how to analyze it. and people who curse and so on have a black soul. i already said that such a business

is expelled . in what city is this negotiation process, since it may not, uh, it can take place today and immediately . but you need to mature before this process. antony did not get up in the verkhovna rada, when the guys who laid down their lives were honored with a moment of silence, then they honored the memory of the dead, but they sat defiantly today , and their steps already speak of the fact that we are helping , and we are being blamed, because they are accusing us of not honoring our they serve there, that is, the evolutionary process is taking place. and i still hope that the time will come, not in the distant future , when metropolitan onufriy will still sit down at

the negotiating table with metropolitan epiphanius and they will reach a consensus. there are several options that can be considered uh, i am talking to the bishops who are part of the moscow patriarchate until today in the ukrainian orthodox church. they are looking for ways out, but today the leadership has taken such a firm position and does not want to enter into this process, especially at the last at that local council in may on the 27th , which was held last year , the impossibility of such a thing was declared in advance , the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate set the following conditions dialogue is impossible, that is, we must abandon these conditions and start the negotiation process without any preconditions. i think that such a process will begin because the state is interested in it, as far as we can see, and to date, the same

recommendations of the national security council that were introduced by the president in action we can see how active the process of joining parishes is and e.e. in western ukraine , entire regions are making a decision to ban the activities of the moscow patriarchate in their territory. that is, all these moments, i think will still force the leadership of the moscow patriarchate to sit down at the negotiating table, but if even the leadership does not take this step , the process will begin from below, it may be the bishops who can gather and change the leadership, it also does not pose any problems for humanity to let the bishops and believers the format in which it is untenable is the best way out. of course, this is the self-dissolution of the holy synod of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate and let the bishops together with their priests and

believers on the ground decide their fate itself because the corporatism which should help in solving current issues is the hope for today. how will it be in the future? bishops who are dissatisfied with their leadership can gather to announce some kind of meeting to address the ecumenical patriarch now the dnipro candles are gathering again. they turned to patriarch bartholomew of the ray of acceptance of them for some transitional period in his jurisdiction, the opening of, perhaps, some autonomous structure or exarchate. well, let's to see how the fanar will react to this appeal, the bishops can do the same if they are forced to do it by the priests on the ground , i.e. the classic revolutionary as they say, the situation at the top cannot, the bottom does not want to, but 63 churches

were transferred to the orthodox church of ukraine at the beginning of the year, and 8.5 thousand other churches remain in the moscow patriarchate, you personally have an explanation - it is only legal, some factors do not contribute to the transition. is it just the position of the communities here, not the position of the communities , they usually divide themselves because in us in the kyiv region, here are the parishes that i accept, er, part of the believers wants and sincerely wants to join the local ukrainian orthodox church, and some of them, as you gave an example, there are those who call names and are actually not sectarians, and such er, a few people are enough for them to as they say, a spoonful of tar spoils the whole barrel of honey, and unfortunately such a situation exists, and it is also worth noting that 30 years of propaganda, which was carried out not canonical, but not real

, etc., etc., played their role and to this day in the brains of many er believers and priests in such a negative negativity, he remained and until the leadership does not change the rhetoric and does not say that i'm sorry , we overstepped the mark a little with these, with such uh , conclusions, it is uh, very difficult. of course, the clergy must change the input of their thoughts and changed their brains a little and the approach to solving this issue .

in a moment we will be back this was me before bleeding gums inflammation of the gums and the solution was so simple gum problems lacalut active lacalut active actively overcomes bleeding gums protects against periodontitis and visibly tightens clear lacalut active action you feel immediately new lacalut active plus even more active protection christ is risen roads beautiful and her sisters heartily congratulates all of you on that great glorious holiday which we call the holiday of holidays and the celebration of all things on this day when christ triumphantly comes out of the grave we

we realize that the good news of the celebration of the passions of death and the resurrection of christ is not only about him, it is also about each of us . ukraine - will win because christ is risen we will rebuild our cities and villages because christ is risen our relatives our girls and boys will return from the front we will heal our wounds because christ is risen i congratulate all of you i wish you happy easter holidays a bunch of haystacks and warm

of the blessed spring of god's christ peace christ is risen truly risen we continue the saturday political club program angelica and i are seasonal and sad and in fact this week we were met again by videos that spread on the network about the execution of our prisoners of war by the russian occupiers and vitaliy and everyone began to ask themselves the question why are the russians so cruel and i was somewhat surprised by this , because we have already seen a lot of this cruelty , that's why people are so surprised, it still scares me and always any cruelty explanations and by the way, here is an explanation, there were a lot of construction theories that this video was published to intimidate ukrainians, to intimidate russian soldiers, to tell russian soldiers to see that ukrainians will do the same to you as we did to them, that's why we're showing this one to provoke the ukrainians to the fact that they did the same to you, so that you would not surrender as prisoners. i think that this is all just an attempt to rationally

explain irrational things. i think that the people who shoot the published videos are not just an act is still filming and publishing, in addition to the wild act itself, there is filming and publishing. i think they are just flaunting it, and by the way, this is a direct consequence of the criminalization of war. this is when we said that the handsome man got a free hand to travel around the colonies and mobilize people who are quite often committed grave crimes of atrocity in russia itself, crimes among the citizens who did it all the time, and they first released them, secondly, they rehabilitated them, thirdly, they were pardoned

by the decree of the president of russia, and fourthly, they approved in the state duma, there is a law according to which the mention of the past of these people is simply biographical. what do you know? yes, this person received the title of hero of russia or an order, but in fact she killed her own wife there , cut up her own children, and carried out a robbery with a mass murder of people, if you you are talking about this, you are a criminal, not her. and you, because you compromise her, you cannot talk about it. she is a hero. she is defending russia, er, in donbas, it is absurd, but it is, but everyone asked this question. and what should this absurdity lead to? this because you don't have to think that there is some conscript who got into the russian army with some student lava or just there from some small russian town, what the first thing he will do at the front is to cut off someone's head. believe me, it is not so easy to do even if you are cruel a person, but a person with a criminal past. well, she could already do it. it’s a big expense

. why do they do it? what from the convicts ? yes, we should have expected this and this, by the way. it’s a century-old practice. to do they began to create an alliance with the criminal world and why were they not like that before this criminal world they themselves were by and large criminal here is this famous party legend that i always remember about as the future general secretary of the all-union communist party of the bolsheviks yosif and sorionovych stal and the future member of the politburo of the central committee of this party and hryhoriy kostyatsinovych, a scientist of heavy industry, are waiting from torokhansk, they are walking through the snow in the taiga, they are dead , i don’t remember how long it takes to go there for a long time without food, in principle, any person who goes there will die of hunger on this

route, everyone knows this and everyone asked. well , how did they get there, such heroes of stalin, jonatiy , they said that they took the freedom of the third person. well, they ate. well, now it arises the question is if a person who has experience of cannibalism, and not forced cannibalism like during some kind of famine there, and the capital of cannibalism is planned, when you negotiate with ordzhonikidze, we’ll take something of it. you see , he looks good there, he’s so fat , we’ll have something to live on. imagine what that is like a person comes to the head becomes the head of a state with such life experience , and before that he robbed banks, killed people during bank robberies, so here you have a criminal and a professional revolutionary. that's what they called themselves professional revolutionaries in one bottle. now let's imagine that they come to power, the first thing they do is open prisons, release all their own , first release political prisoners

, the bolsheviks conclude the union as much with political as with criminal ones, they rewrite history, you know the famous one everyone knows this story about mishka yaponchyk, the criminal authority of odessa, and grishko kotovsky dared his red commander when there was an amnesty in 1917, in february tomishka yaponchyk was released from prison and grishka kotovsky remained, you know why. because between yaponchyk sat for political articles, he was generally anarchic he was an anarchist activist , he was a political prisoner , and the kotovsky river was a bandit, a murderer, engaged in robberies, but in soviet history , everything is the opposite. brave robin hood, although in fact yaponchik was destroyed by his unit of the arenaxists, the red army men after that created such a legend , and kotovsky, as you know, was an ordinary

bandit until the last day of his life , so this is such a criminal red army , these bandits were there. this is simply not a brighter image, because this one seems to me the only bandit in the history of mankind, who was a professional who was put in a mausoleum in kotovsk for the winter , yes, somewhere in ukraine, this is generally such high-level cynicism, the second bandit who was embalmed in the history of mankind was steel he said he was a bank robber and cannibals, not figuratively, but in the literal sense of the word, that is, after the second world war, people who were in prison are also called to the front , political prisoners are left in the loop , criminals are released after these criminals , barricades are set up, criminals are used as cannon fodder yes, this has forever remained one of the greatest moral pages of the second world war . but now when we ask, when

did the soviet red army come to the territory of germany and did such and such other things some atrocities are known that absolutely do not justify the atrocity of the hitlerites, that is because the letters of the hitlerites who told their relatives that you expect from the russians because they will do half of what we did to them, then you will not be satisfied but again, there is an official version that the people who committed these atrocities did they do it from where, but if there is such a large number of criminals in such a large army, then maybe they did it out of desire, why not, you understand, you should not think that an ordinary soldier of the red army, well , our relative served, so they still saw these people who were there as our grandfathers, er, some distant relatives, we saw them alive, this is not the same and not history. i apologize for the first world war or the war of 1812, these people did not commit any atrocities, and they always talked about those who had

already committed in the fact that they were not bandits, if you are not bandits, you can hate these people who killed your family, even more so in the jewish environment, you can imagine the holocaust killed the whole family, but you will not rape a german and then cut them into pieces. it you also understand, you can burn with the desire for revenge, but cutting a person into parts is also absolutely necessary before that, you also say to shoot when it’s war, that’s one thing, it’s another thing , that’s what they do with sex, the desire for revenge , of course, overwhelms a person, but it does not automatically make him an animal. few people will be able to to do it, and the desire should be exactly that, and now, during this war, they are succeeding, and by the way, the kgb was waiting for this. they always wanted to do this, to criminalize the army, they indulge in this very criminalization

do you understand, it is interesting that they act all the time with the same means, they criminalize the poor population, drag him to prison, bring him to prison for life, because there is a huge gap between the masters of life and this little russian man, the animal trembles, or do i have rights and that's it right, i have it crystallized. that is why for me it is not just a terrible crime , you know, it is a whole philosophy of russian life. the cultivation of this hazing in the most disgusting forms, when a person who comes to serve but immediately falls into slavery to someone who is already serving, and this person who is already serving humiliates her, she turns her into anything. and by the way, it started right then and they

even promote it in there were also no films at that time when my parents served there, so you understand, but then they began to draft people with criminal convictions into the army, and people with criminal convictions, because if you had a political conviction, you were not accepted in the army, it is not interesting. that would be you hopeless but with political convictions, please, with criminal alliances, please, and these people established zone rights in the army, and when my generation was already serving, it was already logical. ilya looked at it with wide-open eyes because i did not understand philosophy, that is, you were humiliated in any way how did you once transfer to the second year and start humiliating those who came who came again it didn't even occur to you to break this terrible circle and then people left with this, many with an absolutely broken psyche because if you were beaten, if you were forced to do some

completely wild things, if you were raped , if they also became widespread. in the armed forces, you were already a different person, and it was us when we started to recruit students during training for the army because there were not enough people connected with afghanistan, we actually got, i would say a lost generation, then many, not all people were able to leave there with a high head those who were able to. they were very strong people. i also know these people who were able to go through it and not