[000:00:00;00] what should be done, sandra, in march of this year, ukrainians voted for a petition that received more than 25,000 votes to rename the russian federation to muscovy . then the president instructed the prime minister to investigate in detail whether it is possible to do this according to certain international norms and whether we can do it within the state so that it is not the russian federation but muscovy as far as this time we know more or you know more about this question, is it possible and is it necessary in your opinion, first of all, no one informed me and the chopolists who can solve it all

but i will say right away that there are many countries in the world that have the same name and they are called differently by what the french were french before 1991. until they voted for independence, we called it the fifth time, that is, little russia, what we can see today is the beautiful embassy of the state of austria, it is written in ukrainian , the austrian embassy, ​​the german embassy ostereihu yes, the name of the orthodox people will be completely different, this is what we call hungary, the germans call it hungary, and it is clear that historically this country is called our neighbors in a completely different way. it was characteristic of us to call the popular ones there for a certain time, lyakh, but this cannot be reflected because it is so ancient legend what about the czechs and the russians? and what we

call today the official russian federation. it has always been called muscovy muscovy in our country. and all the more so muscovy is a good term, it is latin-speaking all the more so. muscovy is latin under latin, this is the tradition, that's why there are no problems with this. i want to note that, for example, the netherlands just a year ago adopted the rule that it is enough to call us dutch - holland, the netherlands , call us everything officially, the netherlands, that's the usual things, countries are renamed countries. well, what about romania? 170 years ago, it was called vozhoshchyna, there are discussions about the name of georgia , also because georgians call themselves secret attacks, they ask to be called that, for example , estonia seems to call them only that and that it was adopted at the parliamentary level. that is, we are talking about the fact that there are traditions of calling neighbors what they want to call themselves, and how we have historically developed and what the russians will now

say about ukraine. this is their political decision. this is how patriarch gundyaev adopted it in 2013. pulled up that's why there's nothing strange here. it's our aesthetic right to call these people the way we used to call these people : muscovy, the brainy demoscovshchyna, it's not some scandal because these traditions. i'm telling you, austria, you don't have any complaints. we call them austria, not ostreich, that's how we call germany germany. russia calls germany germany. and this is deutschland. well, that's all. do you understand these historical terms ? this is not a war, even at the legal level . oleksandr, as always, meaningful and interesting . thank you oleksandr alfyorov , historian, researcher at the institute of history. of the national academy of sciences of ukraine , an officer of the armed forces of ukraine was in direct contact with us, friends, the marathon, the only news

, continues, stay with us , you are not lazy, you are not lying, and our work is righteous, holy god who for what and we are for independence so it is difficult for us because of that millions of frightened defenseless creatures whose only hope for salvation were stela ordinary ukrainians kulyuh oleksandr wandered through the mined forest for three weeks together with 13 horses feeding on leaves and the cows of trees he saved oleksandr the owner of the dog's brother searched for food in the occupied villages and fed

3.5 thousand dogs with soup for a month, saving them from starvation , veterinarian svitlana evacuated dozens of animals from the kharkiv ecopark every day, two of them were roasted, mykola saved 160 ostriches that after a few months, they gave birth to a hundred little ostrich chicks, the light-hearted ones in our people will definitely overcome the darkness. i lost my job and could not sit idly by the ground for the rest of my life. she, as my family, had long been thinking of starting my own business. so i took grand and the greenhouse, now i have a job and everything thanks to this, the team also saw that the state supported me. and now i’m building it like this together and we’re building everything, little by little, because i’m a job . government grants are available. apply for a job. there is a job

. diya.gov.ua. and develop your business. we don’t continue. russian and questioned the sovereignty of the post-soviet countries ukraine, estonia and lithuania reacted to the scandalous statement of the chinese ambassador to france, the head of the lithuanian foreign ministry said that precisely because of this, china cannot be trusted as a mediator in russia's war against ukraine and doubted the geography knowledge of his chinese colleague and ambassador of ukraine in france vadym omelchenko, we can hear the test question who owns crimea is indicative as always next time it would be good to expand it with the question of who owns

vladivostok there is no room for ambiguity crimea - this is ukraine vadym melnychenko, the ambassador of ukraine in france, russian diplomats were asked to leave germany expelled employees of russian diplomatic missions in russia, they threaten to take revenge and promise to significantly reduce the number of their colleagues there , in general, berlin was accused of trying to destroy russian-german relations, in general, russian diplomats are out of favor in many countries, norway has recently declared 15 representatives of russian missions oleg shanshur - a diplomat extraordinary and the plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine pachy, greetings, good night, in response to this, russia is now announcing that they are expelling more than 20 german diplomats from the country because it is outrageous how such statements can be made and so on. who will win in this diplomatic game? well, i hope that

our partners will all win. russia was quite predictable as far as the conclusion of the russian diplomats is concerned . in my opinion, this is absolutely the right decision. obviously, it could have been done earlier. that in russian embassies uh, well, diplomats uh, make up only part of uh, the staff of the embassy, ​​and the special services are represented very widely, on the other hand, in my opinion, this is also part of the further political diplomatic isolation of russia in relation to this scandal with the chinese ambassador to france only as we read, he called

crimea the original russian, this is in fact a continuation of that norm that does not promote the entire ministry of foreign affairs of china and the entire committee of the communist party of china on international affairs that history is ambiguous, there are deep historical things there which will still have to be understood. what is china for? well, actually being there and having its own diplomatic representation even in france , which is our extraordinary partner , these kinds of things are voiced. well, again , there is nothing unexpected, and i have said about it more than once that it is necessary to understand that china is and will always be a partner, not only a partner, an ally of russia, they have a lot in common, and one must also understand that in china, as in russia, ambassadors do not make

unexpected statements. everything is agreed descends from china, and i think it just confirms the fact that to expect that china will be some kind of biased mediator between ukraine and russia is an absolute delusion , an absolutely illusory hope , what is this done for? i think that is why it will be much more difficult for macron to convince his fellow citizens of the international community that it is necessary to involve them

. russia and in a diplomatic sense, also because when there is a diplomatic official meeting, handshakes, negotiations, talks behind closed doors, it always raises certain questions among partners who can now dare to communicate with russia, well, from your point of view, and well, what are the risks here, who can communicate with we saw it in russia . we saw it in the example of iran. we saw it in the example of china . well, it is clear that for

those who consider themselves to belong to the community of democracy, and russian diplomats are, as they say, hands. the big seven should take place soon on may 19 in japan, and it is expected that there will be a very important meeting and conversation. president zelensky should join there virtually. hmm, and one of the important issues this is a matter of sanctions and, let's say, the complete isolation of russia, now all countries will support this isolation both diplomatically and economically, in particular, that is, there is no such thing as sitting on two chairs, that's right , even at this diplomatic level , it is no longer possible to do that, that is, to be honest,

of course there are people and they try to sit on two chairs, i wrote more than once and they said about the special position of the french president, but if you look at the format of the meeting itself - in the format of seven, then in principle, all decisions are supported by all the participants of the seven, and of course it is very important that the sanctions pressure be increased, and this is happening right now , the meetings of the seven and what was said by the president about the fact that it is very important not only to strengthen pressure, but also to eliminate all the loopholes that allowed circumventing

the sanctions , i think it will also be obvious that it will be discussed during the meeting of the seven visit to beijing and the meeting with zinn, he is promoting an idea to which, so far , i don't know. there is no such crazy reaction, but he is talking about the need to create an alternative to the g20 countries, which, as you noted, are now conditionally neutral and which could unite and e -e create your own agenda in the world, accordingly, do not ask hm permission from the united states or the european union, how to end the conflict in ukraine, as they say, and make and make decisions independently .

i hope that this idea won't take off and i'm almost convinced of this. nothing, again, this is the third time i'm talking about it, uh, discussing today , uh, night plots, ah, nothing surprising, because we heard it from uh, lula, there's no uh, that's why that this is in principle the leader of such a left populist left populist direction and that is why he puts forward such ideas because in many issues he is absolutely on the same page as china and russia and turkey, that is, it is clear that he will try to to strengthen their position in the international arena but i don't think that this idea will be supported by the members of the twenty-twenty and those on whose support gula counts. by the way

, the president of the united states , joe biden, if we return to the topic of our partners or those who have not yet decided i'm talking about the french leader in particular. here i am now. information that biden had a phone conversation with macron after his not very unambiguous statements about the united states and china and what china in particular . really one of recent such statements or scandals related to the statements of the president of france. i have once again expressed my opinion on this matter more than once, in principle , only one person can influence macron , that is, his statements, on the one hand, have an objective side - this is the english tradition of labor as a country of balance as a third

force that speaks to both sides of various conflicts and thanks to this provides a seat at the negotiating table on the most important issues on the other side of it in this case it is not the least factor is the position of macron himself, who claims the role of such a big world politician and sometimes makes statements based on his beliefs and even puts such a not very good position. french diplomats about this we already know from various sources and we have already seen it even in the public sphere. thus, if we go back to the conversation with biden , it is clear that the chinese side

is trying to use macron to strengthen contradiction or stimulation the contradiction between the usa and europe and france and within the european union, on the other hand, the americans, in my opinion, reacted very restrainedly at the official level to macron's words, emphasizing the issue of unity. well , let's say the anti-putin coalition and the unity of nato member countries -atlantic community but i think that , in principle, it is the same macron. well, he is beginning to understand the negative impact on his own position of what he said about china and the conversation with biden, judging by

the fact that you became aware of her. also with on his part to a certain extent i think so demich control al- but i think he will continue his efforts to involve china for negotiations e between the organization of negotiations between russia and ukraine and in my opinion this idea is absolutely zero e p olezhe what i think this is another question about macron , don't you think that the french president, in such statements about the third power of the superpower and so on and so on, is trying to use a solution to compensate for his political losses , in which he, of course, has immersed himself very much in france itself, you have seen this video of how his egg is already flying and you know that he is finishing his second term and he will no longer be the president, and he must somehow show his extraordinary power and

then give lectures about something, and when he will to travel around the world, we must give him credit, unlike all of them, one figure known to all of us, he endured it so steadfastly, i understood the question, what is this, of course, there is a huge minus to his security, i would say. thus , of course, there is this gorbachev factor when well, let's say more well-known and popular outside his country, because if you take macron's popularity in france , it is hidden in 26-28 percent. although now, after the visit to china, his popularity is also largely negative.

the french themselves wrote, he is trying to try on the states of such a big international ball, a pacifier, a mediator, and so on, along with that, i think that he still understands if you take talking, which is now taking place in france around the pension reform, no let's say international even successes will not have an impact on the attitude of those who oppose this reform. and such 70% of the population of france means that here it is possible to agree on how appropriate this reform is. yes, it is appropriate, but the popularity of the french president is also a fact. thank you very much, alexander was in direct contact with us, this is a diplomat , the extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine. thank you

for joining. ambassador of ukraine to belarus igoryak zima for consultation, the department also called on belarus to refrain from such steps and stop supporting russia's aggressive war against ukraine . have already heard and seen , but what did the belarusians say about pushylin's visit , how do the heroes perceive him, is he a friend of lukashenka? well, in general, how would it be in the belarusian agenda that the arrival itself, as if the gulyator, so to speak, passed by, and it cannot be said that this is the main problem that worries

belarusians, which is located in belarus and outside the borders, that is, - for belarusians, yes, well, lukashenko is dating someone, it is clear that we are still dating, and with all possible and impossible world dictators , he met harshly . head no country, but the ukrainian foreign ministry wrote that in this way belarus legitimizes unrecognized quasi-formations on the territory of the sovereign state of ukraine , the president meets with the second illegitimate so-called leader, that is , in general, one can say that he is a citizen of belarus

aleksandr lukashenko meets a-a as far as i remember, he opened himself to the ukrainians a-a while still a-a they sent us as a master well , this is not a meeting of the sound of two-toned persons, and in the second place, no matter how i do not tell it all, but in itself i will once again repeat that in myself in the very night, in the statement of the ukrainian foreign ministry, it is not said that lukashenko legitimizes poshilina or ldr, and the republic of belarus legitimizes such visits. why do we ask about this ? they essentially cast a shadow on all citizens of belarus . doesn't think that here it seems to me to be the essence of this statement, well, unfortunately, in such and such a way , it turns out that, as alexander lukashenko met, that the ukrainian mfa somehow recognizes a legitimate lukashenko i do not think что это стоит добать а-а lukashenko of 907 does not recognize

this , once again i say in the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs that such visits to the republic of belarus create the impression that it is not lukashenko, but the republic of belarus that legitimizes the ldr, the ukrainian ministry of foreign affairs does not recognize lukashenko. that the ministry of foreign affairs does not recognize lukashenko, but let's separate all the republics of belarus, and here is alexander lukashenko , with two different histories, the belarusian people and alexander lukashenko are running away. not otsetyu, but not regions like ukraine that are now under russian occupation, these meetings are taking place on the territory of belarus, precisely the proclaimed president lykushenko lukashenko lives on the territory of belarus, it is clear that we cannot demarcate. that is, in essence

, we have what we have. lukashenko's latest statements that he believes that belarus is being dragged into the third world war, but who is dragging belarus into the third world war if lukashenko cooperates with russia and lukashenko himself accepts the terrorist pushylin in his territory belarussian lukashenko belarus is a military action , that is , it can't be any kind of double reading. life belarusians live their life but it is impossible it cannot last long then or the belarusians need to take power in their hands let's say so what have they already tried to do or well what to form some

separate republic named after lukashenka well let's a-a in fact, we discussed here, literally, everything is happening now. where am i , the meeting of belarusians in the belarusian diaspora and very carefully, in fact, such events that are happening in ukraine are very important for us, so that ukraine wins and a-a won not a-a a cold conflict, a cold war, some armistice, and of course completely defeated the russian federation, and then there is a chance for belarus to free itself from the dictatorship of alexander lukashenko, because the radiant dictatorship rests practically on russian bayonets on russian money and nothing more. regarding the topic of nuclear threats, you know that the date is approaching when russia promised to place certain things on objects in belarus. what is being written today is it being talked about, does anyone believe that this

will come true? and unfortunately, the situation with aleksandr lukashenko, anything will happen , and i will not be surprised if the placement of nuclear weapons on the territory of the republic of belarus is timed to the chernobyl disaster. traditional protest action belarusian positions and uh, now, too, people. we can't hold it in minsk, that's why we're preparing a-ah povednye events a-ah, as it were, outside the borders of the republic of belarus and in the countries of the european union, and we'll attract them, what can we do to attract them attention to this missile problem in the international community unfortunately, now we don't have the resources in order for belarus to become something, somehow, the belarusians. well, i understand that they are not

ready in the sense of accepting what belarus is will it be a part of the russian federation as such? i mean not territorially, but definitely under the influence. that is, it will also be perceived as history that cannot be changed yet, because well, according to you , the expectations are that putin's regime will fall and thus lukashenko's regime will fall and then belarusians will be able to become the main let's say so in their country correctly well, practically yes and uh , i am not asking any illusions. they allowed the others to somehow get a chance for independence from the territory, as if from the russian federation. that's why we are unfortunately forced to wait, and i will say that because of one historical chance for the republic

of belarus, because it is actually now in belarus 40 aggressors, i reminded that ukraine was messing around on the territory of the republic of belarus, and what was happening to them was just a crime, and it was also discussed in the diaspora, and how was the international arrest of vladimir putin unconditionally it is exactly the same arrest of the order, the arrest should be beneficial to alexander lukashenko , you know, often in the media space, in the information field, there are such hopes, or you can call it some kind of utopian story, some people believe in it that the russian federation should disintegrate in a certain part and you know, i like certain analytics. when they say that for that and remembering the moment when the soviet