[000:00:00;00] everyone should understand this. and when this understanding comes to everyone. well, then probably many of them will change their side. these are people who probably forgot how they demolished the walls of the cities of ukraine, how they created chickens on the tracks in the western direction and liza in these vacation trains. i am again i don't want to blame anyone. and i'll repeat, that is, everyone has their own life circumstances, well, children, that is, there are many , so i'll repeat myself, i don't give a moral and ethical assessment, i don't want to give it. i just want to show , well, more the psychological component of such behavior and why such behavior seems absolutely acceptable for many, i.e. if it does not sound paradoxical, but this fear really appeared at a certain stage to the controlling factors and to the extent that this factor disappears well, some believe that it is possible to completely return to those patterns of behavior that took

place starting from the 14th of the year to february 24 of last year. well, when there is a war somewhere, but it does not directly affect everyone individually. the war is not over . the war is not over. i announce, so to speak the fog of war. to put it in klaus's terms, look, he didn't go to russia, so i'll tell you what's more, if someone thinks that it's very safe in the rear, that is , the story that you're a meadow is safe because the relevant authorities are carrying out their systematic work. i've already repeatedly mentioned on your broadcast tv channel to subscribe, read the telegram channel of the security service of ukraine and you are already wondering how much every day the security service of ukraine exposes saboteurs, spies , enemy agents who correct the fire, who spread false information, who

they are trying to destabilize the situation near the combat zone in the rear. moreover, i will repeat that all these bot farms are, as you say, companies that provided activities er in the occupied territories of the russians, they are not there, they are here, you understand, they are in ukraine er in in kiev, the capital of ukraine, they are in the last because the farm that was detained, she miraculously in ivano-frankivsk, seems to have been provided to us by an internet provider there , for example, which provided services in the so-called this is the results of the work, you understand the risky work of a large number of people, and instead of somehow being aware of it, some people, well , i understand that on the one hand, all these performances are also an assessment and evidence of our successes, because i don't remember anyone applying such performances, i don't remember yes, how was it in march? i don't remember anyone in kyiv organizing such

a race because there was no one to organize it. everyone stood in lines at the military commissariat. they stood in all lines at the military commissariat. on mukachevo, but you don’t understand this, i will repeat that everyone has their own motives, that is, who is leading you, but i will repeat that in fact president zelenskyi is absolutely right now. of our duty, that is, we need to be aware of it and we don't need to show some disrespect, at least i'm not a fan, by the way, even you remember last year there were all the same scandals about the fact that there are night clubs working there someone is banging there dances things like that, well, okay. if it is not prohibited by law, i understand, that is, a person cannot live in permanent stress

, people need to relieve this stress , those people who come for the rotation can be there, you can say, that is, they may also need it , their children may be there their loved ones, their sisters, brothers, sons, in the end. that is, it is normal, but i will repeat myself, let's at least comply with the requirements of the current legislation and respect each other, and not demonstrate what they wanted to say. well, they are demonstrating their native challenge no more they want to demonstrate their exceptional shit, we can afford it. it seems to me that this is a demonstration of real disdain, so i think that there are many now , i understand. well, mostly young people, i understand. we were all young, everyone has some ambitions and everyone wants to show you something there, but to date, all your energy , all your ambitions, all your heroism, there is a place to apply it with a much higher coefficient

of benefit from the action, both for yourself personally and for the society and state of which each of valentina, let's talk in more detail about messages and actions that can harm the armed forces of ukraine and, in general , our counteroffensive. nataliya humenyuk of the operational command center south reacted to the information about the alleged landing of the armed forces of ukraine on the left bank of the occupied part of the kherson region. said that it is a very difficult job. when it is necessary to overcome such an obstacle, like the dnipro, when the front line passes by a wide, powerful river. therefore , the conditions of a military operation require informational silence until it is safe enough for our

military . positions on the left bank of the dnieper in the kherson region were made public by the american institute for the study of war. and nataliya humenyuk reported that due to the appearance of such information in russian, the occupiers increased shelling on the left bank mr. valentina of the kherson region, why do such publications and institutes such as the institute for the study of war allow themselves to publish such information for public access, in general, how much can it harm and why do they allow it? and who can i forbid it? to do, because this is a matter of strategic plans, well, you understand that this institute is outside the borders of ukrainian er and ukrainian jurisdiction, well, that is, they can publish whatever they want, the problem is why we er read it and

give it such weight more than once also mentioned on the air the statements that, again, from zelensk at the beginning of the war, he articulated repeatedly in conditions when the information space can also be a tool for waging a hybrid war, a component of this war for disinformation, for destabilizing the situation , for misleading. hygiene and to trust exclusively the type of messages that come from official bodies well, if someone is interested, someone gets a kick out of it . only in ukraine, all these bloggers, i don’t know good russian there, yes, there is also something about it there , they are constantly telling something . well, okay, you want to listen, i can’t ban and you can’t ban, no one can add to the information that was submitted, well,

that is, she is this the information is in line with the expectations of the majority of ukrainians, these expectations are related to the future counteroffensive, and i will remind you that before this there was information or now or never , that is, it concerns the counteroffensive itself and the further future, which depends exactly from the results of this counteroffensive, that's why it's natural that ukrainians are interested in this, and especially they react to some positive and positive information , well, i don't want to call it an attempt at analytics. well, you understand that dynamo is playing. yes, of course. well, that's why i'm just here. recently, i gave a comment about this. why are ukrainians in such a hurry ? well, not ukrainians, but the ukrainian public , society, yes, is so impatient about

the counterattack, the answer is very simple, because well, everyone is tired of the gate so that it ends as soon as possible and everyone is fine. it's all good that without the outline of a successful counteroffensive, this war will not end . well, that's why everyone is sitting now, wait, now the armed forces of ukraine will conduct this counteroffensive and i will go to egypt, well, you understand . that is, this is inadequate behavior in that's what i'm talking about, so i'll repeat that there are people who directly plan this operation, there are people who directly participate in it . in germany, who said that for a successful counteroffensive, ukraine needs tens of times more weapons than at present, how many we have now, how many of them we have , this is not enough. i am not ready to study, and i am sure that most of those people

who demand a counteroffensive are today or never i don't understand why it is either today or never, it's not just about the fact that people are tired and waiting, but egypt has such a part of the population here, we won't lie, but the question is that really the war has been going on for more than a year, and many of our defenders are dying, and we just want it to end with our victory as soon as possible and our golden boys and girls not to die . it seems to me that the biggest question of most people is this. to minimize our losses about this too. by the way, the president of ukraine said that when the battles were fought for the people of lysych , well, about the fact that when we liberate our land from these roshen hares,

we will, we cannot afford to lead themselves as they behaved. that is, we cannot erase our own cities from the face of the earth, therefore we need absolutely different tactics and other high-precision, highly effective weapons in order to minimize losses both among our military personnel and among the civilian population who may find themselves in the area of ​​their actions i will repeat that our ambitions are meant simply as people as citizens of ukraine, this is one story, but there is a purely military component that depends on the solution of specific operational tactical strategic tasks and this is dealt with above the military-political command of ukraine, so i didn't want just this psychological factor. well, impatient, i understand what it is caused by, i am exaggerating, of course, simplifying in order to cause some kind of emotional reaction, which may make at least some people think, but you have to understand that since

a tree does not pull its leaves, it does not grow faster . we need not just a counteroffensive, you understand , not just a counteroffensive, but a successful effective counteroffensive that will bring the desired result, and this is not a counteroffensive, we must implement it in such a way that to minimize losses, in particular, among our military personnel, which was already mentioned above, er, well, that was the point, let's still, we really like to repeat our faith in the dstu, let's believe in the sbu and support and support and believe . that is, they know what they are doing, let 's not to push them or create such an atmosphere of impatience that can push someone to some reckless years

. well, it's still simple. i didn't want to. well, i wouldn't want us all to create some possibly inadequate expectations, because ms. malyar also said about this that we imagine counteroffensive is something so magical, you know, and in fact, even defense of bakhmutu is also is an element of this countermeasure, well, somewhere we hold back, somewhere uh , we will carry out counteroffensive actions, somewhere we do not carry out oppositional defense. well, for that there are specially trained people who have been studying this for years. well, i am not ready to teach them now how should they better plan this counteroffensive, unfortunately, there are many people in ukraine who, according to the expression, "i'm sorry about this" in russian , a classic phrase, yes, каждый недже себя стратиром видео, fight from the sides , unfortunately, such strategies are too much now.

let's summarize mr. valentina had the armed forces of ukraine and we support them to donate. we thank you for joining in. valentin glynykh, a political scientist, was on the phone with us. well, we want to announce that at six o'clock in the morning at six o'clock , if it is accurate, we will have the opportunity to talk with nataliya gumenyuk about the situation in the south, ah, the operational situation, so wait, let me remind you that we will actually be here until six in the morning. well, then the broadcast will continue with our colleagues , let's continue talking about the compromise with putin regarding the war e-e of russia in ukraine, which is not what can be. and it will be a fatal mistake if it happens, and the territorial integrity of our state must be restored, wrote the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro kuleba, in

columns for the publication of the german edition of evelta in his opinion, history teaches that the world needs real peace, not peacemaking, and russian aggression against ukraine threatens the whole of europe and can become an example for other authoritarian regimes if we make more mistakes now and decide to reward putin for his aggression any in what form, instead of defeating him, give a lesson to other potential aggressors, the future of ukraine, europe and the whole world will be put at risk trolleybus political scientist-international joins welcome to our broadcast, mr. dmytro, yes, let's check the connection again, because unfortunately we haven't heard you yet, mr. dmytro , can you hear us? good night, yes. good night , let's know what i wanted to ask you to clarify. heard a quote by the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, mr. kuleba, who says that there is no need to sit down at the negotiating table with an aggressor country, and that this is not

the time for us, it needs to win on the battlefield, the secretary of the national security and defense council also said the same the other day, it is the cry of rhetoric what nobody has a friendly ukraine with russia at the negotiating table. we need more weapons, because russia will only understand such a language now, why is this rhetoric now intensifying ? volodymyr zelenskyi also spoke about the fact that with putin , moreover, more than once that it is impossible to negotiate with putin, and that is why here and in principle all the actions of the russian federation , what is it currently doing? they are theirs, they

confirm this thesis, that is, no readiness move to some kind of negotiations, all the more so to some kind of compromises that not only putin, but in general the entire russian leadership, they don’t even show the same handsome man who is, as if the owner, in fact, the operator of the private military campaign wagner, he also talks about the fact that there there are nice disputes about the methods, yes, they talk. someone is talking about the continuation of an active war, someone is talking about strategic defense. but we are all determined to keep the captured territories and the ukrainian people, and in what connection is there really an effort? to somehow end the war, and we really see here that this is primarily due to the active actions of russia, which imposes its own discourse there

, and due to some misunderstanding of the nature of the conflict. the great russian culture was there before her, and there was a strong economy, they defeated the nazis, but although in fact, from these recent examples, the situation here is somewhat different . moscow was looking for and is looking for geopolitical allies . and here is an example of this statement the president of brazil, lula to silva, who believed that it is really possible to talk with moscow and is in favor of ending the war, and ukraine should give up crimea, and the statement of the ambassador of the people's republic of china in france, which , in general, is something here

well, he demonstrated the optics through which the chinese leadership looks at the world, saying that the sovereignty of the countries that used to be part of the soviet union is not all clear, and crimea in general used to belong to russia. that is, this is the optics that is imperial, that is very close to russia and the statement of mr. dmytro e, the chinese ambassador to france, it can be considered the official position of china itself. well, i think that, of course, the official china does not talk about it, but er, let's talk about the fact that this is purely his opinion. no , china should not er, in china there is really an attitude towards any i mean in communist china yes or after all there is also taiwan yes which is actually called

the republic of china eh and eh my who occupied a place in a permanent member of radio villon until the beginning of the 70s years, that's what i have to take into account i think that hmm, of course they are in view of the fact that there is political diplomatic practice there, it is unlikely that it will be formulated as an official position, but the fact that the leadership of the people's republic of china has such attitudes. i think so about it can be said that the reaction of our allies from the baltic countries, who summoned the ambassadors in their country with appropriate protests , in principle, in principle and in this particular case, is adequate, after all

, it is the ambassador in a key country of the european union and from which he recently traveled to meet with the leader of china, all the calls are just right yes, and this one is why at least well, here we are, what we need to talk about and not to assume that nothing happened. thank you for joining our broadcast and discussion dmytro levovych political scientist the internationalist was marathon, the only news is that we are moving on, meanwhile , i would not have dared to go to war if germany had not blocked the plan for ukraine's membership in nato in 2008 , this was stated by the deputy minister of foreign affairs of poland, piotr wawzyk. in his opinion, what the sooner ukraine joins the alliance, the better, because it will be a guarantee of security not only for ukraine, but also for the entire region, if germany had not tried to delay ukraine's accession to nato

, if ukraine had been invited to join the alliance many years ago in munich, then today there would not be five countries at war in ukraine the g7 agreed to push russia out of the nuclear energy market. japan, great britain, canada, the united states , and france want to use the capabilities of their civilian nuclear power to undermine the kremlin's control over supply chains, as in january, for example, the united the kingdom has created a nuclear fuel fund worth up to 75 million pounds, the purpose of its creation is to provide london with the ability to produce nuclear fuel so that the country can increase the volume of its own nuclear energy , we are joined by mariana bozharin, a senior researcher at the belfer center of the harvard kennedy school, welcome, welcome, good evening , good night night to you good day i'm sure

that mrs. maryanov tell of energy, how long can this process be, how quickly can russia be expelled, the report, it will not be a quick process, unfortunately, we know that russia, in particular, rosatom, is the main company in this industry, they are quite strongly integrated into the global nuclear fuel markets enriched uranium of natural origin, as well as the construction of nuclear reactors themselves and the supply of fuel to them, that is, in fact, a whole chain of nuclear supply chains is tied up in them by rosatom quite strongly in some industries, let's say as a supply chain

enriched uranium up to 40% of the total world market, that is, it will be quite difficult to expel russia from these markets, although it is very, well, very encouraging . and as a result, a certain strategy must be developed, and it is clear that it will take quite a long time to implement this strategy to push russia out of this market.

we are talking about natural uranium itself and uranium enrichment services . i want russia. ah, well, probably for two or three years, ah, in the united states, in my opinion, depends on the united states , somewhere in the united states, supplies of russian natural gas make up about 14% of the enrichment service , 28% of the total market, and somewhere around the same figures for e countries of europe of the union, and that is, here the influence is still to connect canada and let's say france, which is such a powerful enough country, nuclear energy and the same united states, to restore certain capacities, to open certain capacities that existed before that, and replacing russia will be the most difficult to replace

russian supplies actually from the production of fuel, the fuel itself for reactors, e-e russia builds and presents raptors, many russian -made reactors in eastern europe, former warsaw pact countries. let's put it this way. now we know that finland has canceled construction of a russian reactor, but other countries such as, say, hungary continue cooperation with russia, other countries and bulgaria, slovakia, and the czech republic have russian, well, they operate russian reactors , and accordingly, who builds the rotors, mainly that country is the supplier and provides and sells fuel for this reactor ah, the american rules of the game and they will obviously have to be changed, probably involving megatel maga , in particular, but the american company westin house

has already developed fuel assemblies specifically for russian e-e reactors of the russian productions that function in ukraine as well, including american fuel already working in ukraine as well, but actually here to increase the volume of this fuel in order to replace a sufficient amount and supply all reactors that operate russian raptors here in this , after all, it will be the narrowest such section of this market, and in view of everything you just announced, how ready is the world for sanctions against seedlings? and that's what they're talking about lately. we even say that these sanctions can be included in the 11th package. so far there is no official confirmation, but in the end, if the world depends so much on russia in this matter, it is correct. i understand that it is unlikely that such introductions will be sanctioned , it is unlikely that it will be in the near future. it is obvious. because

the safety of these tractors is also tied to this. you can simply stop them, also rosatom provides and er there spare parts serves certain er certain er well certain parts of these reactors er so it is impossible to simply very sharply cut off rosat from cooperation actually with these with these rotors which they built, which they service, and besides all that, it is normal to cooperate with russia in general. well, it is difficult for many countries, if on a moral level, but the nuclear share of nuclear energy and profits from nuclear energy is actually quite small compared to the actual supply and sale -e oil and gas er-e russia somewhere earns about a billion dollars actually on nuclear energy, about two hundred billion dollars

for er-e from gas and on and oil so here you just have to consider which ones in areas eh insert priorities so here it is clear eh we will thank you for this maryana bujarin eh senior researcher of the belfer center of the harvard kennedy school was with us here by the way i also wanted to voice some interesting information which also applies and in particular eh of our nuclear and atomic industry, it became known that there will be about 20 nuclear power units in ukraine , energoatom declares this, in fact, we will definitely talk about it in the next information hour ago we advise you to wait and

we want to invite an informational the news service of the tv channel is appreciated and elena morozova elena. thank you, colleagues, i will gladly tell the news to our viewers, join the news for the marathon, the only news, the only news, together we are strong, the armed forces of ukraine need drones , make your contribution, scan the qr-code, congratulations on the marathon, the news for you works for you the rada tv channel team keeps our finger on the pulse and summarizes the main points for you. ukraine will prepare several important international events. this will help increase the amount of military aid , president volodymyr zelenskyy said during his evening address. we continue to prepare