[000:00:00;00] million dollars, he stated this during a controversy with the famous writer stephen king, who called on the mask to transfer money to the ukrainian prytula fund, in response, mask asked how much king himself donated and announced the amount of his help, presumably it is about the starlink satellite communication system , which was created and maintained by the company spacex mask after the full-scale invasion of russia, musk gave ukraine the opportunity to use starlinks. and , according to him, he refused to take a salary for this , which was supposed to be provided by the us department of defense in confirmation of his words, musk even posted a message on twitter of the vice prime minister of ukraine, a repost of mykhailo fedorov thanking him for the work of starlink, it seems to me that some of our viewers may have a system failure right now, because here musk donated 100 million dollars and the same

over the past six months, information seems to have appeared that musk made one dubious statement , announced another dubious statement, and he says that it's time to sit down at the negotiating table , so mr. sergey, what do you think of elon musk in this war and for ukraine elon musk who should be distinguished here? it is true that mast said a lot of shameful things and some of them can be perceived as, let's say, some ideological preferences, some of them can be perceived as fear of nuclear war , for example, he is afraid of his own program the colonization of mars is based on the idea that humanity at one beautiful, one terrible moment can die or roll back in civilization, these are the ideas of the mask, he repeatedly stated about them in direct text to roll back there 100 to 200 years ago, respectively, no accordingly, there will no longer be an opportunity to colonize another planet. well, he is afraid of a nuclear war, he believes that this may be one of these

manifestations, but at the same time, he, for example, made an absolutely shameful statement that the maidan was directed by the united states, any person who was a person present on the maidan understands that there was no military coup there. the word cube is a military coup, a coup proper. well , there was no coup, especially the one arrested by the americans, but on the other hand, it is necessary to distinguish between things that mask he also says things that he does under masks and he actually does a lot of useful things for us and, moreover, useful things that he did not do, no one else would have done in his place , a typical example is the stalinists, we have already talked about them, the second example is the dragon spaceship that flies manned to the international space station , imagine what would happen if the united states now depended on russia taking their astronauts to the international space station, that was after the space shuttle program was closed. and

now how are these astronauts transported by private the dragon spacecraft that was created by ilona's spacex company created the mask and , accordingly, the lever of pressure that the russians use very very a-a so energetically use rogozin's statement. we will send our cosmonauts on the trampoline if we do not give you the union. well, now the americans are the best trampolines than everything that roskosmos can offer is much cheaper, if with each launch, such transportation becomes cheaper and cheaper. the reusable ship can be used several times . approximate calculations, how much can such a flight become cheaper in general, if we remember when elon musk sent into orbit, hmm , quite famous people were among them, there was also a chinese man, i could be wrong, but i think that he was an artist

, some kind of artist, ot and chi it was only planned a japanese businessman planned a flight to the moon and this japanese businessman was going to take artists with him, but a philanthropist entrepreneur flew to the moon, his last name seems to be isaacman, he flew on a private plane , that is, besides the fact that the mask gives ships for the use of nasa, that is, how do you maintain the international space station, the same ships, they are reusable , you can take it, you can take it and simply send people into space for a research or tourist mission, they have already done it in my opinion twice, but to close the topic with e-e ilon mask yes and in this story with stephen king, ah, i really respect the writer, first of all, for his concrete, clear and consistent support for ukraine, ah, for some reason, everything seems to be that everything that is said by the americans, in particular, is all

such an internal political struggle. - moreover, the topic of ukraine is used quite actively in this, well, it’s true, it’s true, that’s how it is, if you remember the reason, the main reason that served as the basis for the impeachment of donald trump, again , ukraine, uh, there are some mysterious stories with some servers that seem to on the territory of ukraine, there are some red-haired juliani trump's lawyer tried to find here and asked president zelensky to help him in this. that is, almost conspiratorial, some things, so the americans, er, recently america's politics has become very polarized, that is, democrats and republicans are seriously clashing with each other, our happiness is huge, our happiness is that in ukraine, support for ukraine has a bicameral, bicameral character, we are very

lucky with this, and yes, there are certain groups that, uh, did not want to support ukraine, let's say conditional the trumpist camp, but fortunately they do not constitute the majority, despite this politicization and uh, disagreement in uh , political views regarding ukraine, in general , there is a consensus, we need to help, but i just realized that uh, in general, elon musk is with himself he represents an example of this bicameralism and support . every minute of the week you talk about the fact that the five g seven countries agreed to push russia out of the nuclear energy market

japan - great britain canada the united states and france want to use and use the capabilities of their civilian nuclear energy to undermine the kremlin's control over the chains supply, so in january, for example, the united kingdom created a nuclear fuel fund in the amount of up to 75 million pounds, the purpose of its creation was to provide london with the ability to produce nuclear fuel so that the country could increase the volume of its own nuclear energy and, at the beginning of a full-scale invasion, ukraine repeatedly demanded from international partners to introduce sanctions against the russian nuclear industry, this initiative during the discussion of the sanctions policy was supported by a number of countries, in particular , the baltic states, poland, ireland, and in contrast from the oil and gas business, the nuclear industry of the russian federation is currently operating on world markets without obstacles, the main reason is that the rosatom concern controls the entire production chain from uranium mining and enrichment to the construction of reactors and

their supply and maintenance, although it does not have a monopoly, but to find another supplier of uranium concentrate or fuel assemblies is quite difficult, the most difficult situation in the european union, five eu countries use 19 soviet-made nuclear reactors, however, the situation can to change already this year. for example, in april, the big seven announced joint actions to push russia out of the nuclear energy market , then the united states for the first time imposed sanctions on the company from the orbit of rosatom, and german economy minister habak called to exclude the kremlin's nuclear industry to include the kremlin's nuclear industry in the next package of sanctions restrictions and indeed, we talk a lot about the fact that in the next 11th sanctions package there may be sanctions against seedlings, but we have already talked to experts in this topic who say that it is

it is unlikely that this could be the case, because russia really has other countries on its nuclear needle because of what maksym explained to my colleagues , so please tell me what kind of hopes you have for this next sanctions package , i understand correctly that we do not hope that nuclear energy will be struck owns the inside information of what is happening in the european commission in the european union, a year of cardiosis, and here he is literally there, recently he declared that there will be no nuclear sanctions, no nuclear sanctions, no of diamonds in 11 sensational package, it is of course a shame, but the plus point is that this process is going on. we remember the previous rounds of sanctions , it was not easy there either, and we didn't even want to talk about those things that, let's say, in the spring, but let's just say, the issue with

sanctions was very difficult regarding oil products, do you remember a year ago, that is, uh, how, how? we will do without russian oil, without russian, without oil products of russian production, well , now those sanctions are in effect, they are doing their job, and that issue was finally resolved. i hope that, after all, since this question not only we are talking about it, respectable people in the european union are starting to talk about it, and the decision of the g7 countries, how quickly do you think they can succeed in their plan , taking into account, taking into account well, not the monopoly position of rosatom, but still quite long and strong chains. they have the resources to do this. they have always been uh, these are uh, states that have uh , nuclear energy, they have nuclear power plants , it's just that at some point it was more profitable

to buy uh, fuel there, or let's say, raw materials in russia than to spend its resources on its production of purely commercial things, now that's all, the whole scheme will change. it won't be fast , but it will be faster than it could be. let's say this, well, just to understand the pace of the replacement, that is, if we download today the fuel is unloaded into the reactor, then it will work for 1.5-2 years until we remove it. that is, it is a rather long cycle , and accordingly, all the production things connected with it, they also do it not in a month, not in a day well, it's years, but it's a process if it starts today, then it will definitely be completed there in some reasonable period of time, and now i see signs that these are not just words and not just statements, but they are starting to fight against the russian nuclear reaction, i am sure that none of the high-ranking politicians would ever make statements

like those which the g7 did if they did not have real plans to do it and there would also be no statements by germany about the need to include it in the sanctions package in ukraine they announce that approximately 20 nuclear mini-power units will appear energoatom eh declares about it what do you know about it, what kind of blocks are these eh. it's a very interesting story, actually. the thing is that if we start talking about the current state of nuclear energy in the world , well, it has big problems, big problems connected with the fact that the construction of new reactors emphasizes precisely new reactors. this is a long and lengthy process. well, for example, it was not launched there quite recently, a few weeks ago, they began to operate its so-called, it was supposed to work according to the plan, it was supposed to be built,

if i'm not mistaken, 6 years ago instead of 19 were built, the cost was to install it, i could also be wrong, it’s about 3-4-5 billion euros , and the cost is up to 20 now, and that is, it is many times more expensive and many times longer, and the output is why because the reactor is very difficult to certify there are a lot of safety requirements there are a lot of requirements for technology control and a lot of points at which these technological things can be violated somewhere, the wrong brand of concrete has been poured, enough has already been put in place for this to stop or slow down for years, and here is this small modular reactor - it is very powerful a topic that can lead to the revival of the nuclear industry of nuclear energy in a new quality, a small reactor, not a gigabyte, not 1.6 gb, as in those countries that refuse , i think that i think that, well, in those countries where a political decision was made not to develop nuclear energy, such as, let's say, germany

no, they decided that they refused her this, this is a political decision , this is the will of the german people, it must be respected, sometimes phrases like who the germans don't understand what energy is all about are a little surprising - it's so good, they made a decision for themselves and it is the same. and with regard to other countries, there is no possibility to wait conditionally there for many, many years and build one reactor with a capacity of gigabytes or 1.6 gb, like the finnish reactor, for example, or some modern reactors of britain, poland, which are currently being built, but a for 160 as this holtik reactor is what we are going to jointly build, it is not a single company, now it is a very powerful direction , there are about 70 or 80 different design options for these small reactors, their advantage is that they are small and can be quickly to be built on a small area, they are ready to be assembled and installed in a recess. that is, they are not built on the spot. they actually arrive in a ready-made form

. therefore, due to this , they are faster . if i'm not mistaken, ukraine also has to somehow prepare the legislative field so that they could be established here after being certified, and the issue of nuclear energy control in the world well, it is resolved very seriously, because all that well, just for understanding, i am any any in any nuclear reactor uranium fuel turns into plutonium, that is, when it burns out , a nuclear reaction occurs from uranium , plutonium is formed. and plutonium is the raw material with which you can make an atomic bomb, respectively, all reactors, everything that is happening there, how much is there, where is it going, what is in them, and these assemblies are worked out, and what will be loaded there. this is very seriously

controlled, because until then, whether this reactor will be reliable, so far these reactors are in there is no such thing anywhere in the world, that is, they are only in the experimental phase, but if they are certified in the states, i think you can not worry too much about whether they will pass the same certifications in ukraine. by the way, projects in the czech republic are carried out by this company holtek , similar agreements were signed that was discussed not so long ago in the context of er, still, you wanted to update jessen's decision because there is already a reaction of er, russia, the kremlin, and in particular, er medvedev, to certain decisions er, jessavin, and he was talking about certain consequences and says that if really in

in the case of a total ban on the export of goods from the russian federation, moscow will take countermeasures and it can do what it can . so that it has certain resources that no one else has, well, the same oil, the same gas, there is nickel, for example, there. maybe there are some other minerals there , uh, what are they so unique, unique , it turned out that no, yes, they are commercially profitable but no one wants to do business with an inadequate war criminal who no one knows what he will do tomorrow. that is, it is a business that cannot be profitable if , on the other hand, a normal counterparty , a normal partner, he will not be able to work like this. all levels of russia are actually cut off from civilization, starting from fast food like mcdonald's and ending, say, with equipment

for drilling in difficult conditions on the arctic shelf, where very similar specific expensive technologies. hmm, they have some western companies. no one has these technologies anymore. you can’t extract oil and gas . i can’t say what else mr. this person was carrying. this person medvedev said that in particular, russia will take measures, in particular, it will withdraw from the grain agreement . maybe yes, the risk is significant, in fact, the risk is significant risks er-e he for-v formally appeared when instead of 120 days for which the grain agreement was calculated a-a russia declared that the agreement will be valid for only 60

days and the deadline expires if i am not mistaken 18 that is, there is less than a month left in may, and there is a very high probability, well, the word is probably too high, the probability that the agreement will be terminated, at least they will say about it, we are terminating this agreement and we will not continue it, but how will events develop here, there are many options, many factors that can influence it, in particular the elections in turkey, there may be an alternative to the grain corridor, an alternative to land land export, that is, if not the black sea, then the danube river and land the routes, that is, the test, that's exactly where we are, unfortunately, now there are also certain problems related to farmers' protests, and in a number of european countries, here, in fact, we approached this smoothly and negotiations on agricultural imports from ukraine are ongoing in the eu, the european commission plans

to continue the search for a solution with poland, slovakia, hungary, romania, bulgaria, at the same time, the polish radio station a-a fm rmf fm reports that the management is ready to expand the list of goods prohibited for import from ukraine, so far the european commission has agreed only to ban the import of wheat corn repackages sunflower seeds however, she is asked to additionally include in this list sunflowers in oil a-ah hmm also flour honey sugar soft fruits eggs meat and milk mr. serhiy the solution to this problem and the solutions to the problems that must first be understood there are a number of reasons why this happened here, and perhaps not the most important one is that we suddenly began to export and sell in poland a significant amount of agricultural products that previously did not enter these markets, this is the reason, but it is not

the most important reason, let's say another reason - this is the global fall in prices for food and agricultural products, that is, it cost the farmer dearly. they expected to sell, let's say six months ago , polish farmers kept grain. european farmers kept grain , hoping that they would sell it at an even higher price in the spring . per ton, the price has decreased, these are tangible indicators, this is the first, the second moment, the elections in poland, and farmers are one of the electoral resources of the ruling polish party, law and justice accordingly, their interests must be taken into account by politicians during the elections and they, uh, use it well, politicians use it, and they should do it, take into account the interests of the voters, and the inter, and the voters speak , and the voters, polish farmers throw eggs at

the polish minister of agriculture and threaten to disrupt the visit they threatened president zelenskyi to warsaw, which took place accordingly well , it is clear here that the authorities cannot turn a blind eye to this, it is another matter that they are looking for some kind of compromise well, so far, the compromise that now it looks like, so to speak, it has been outlined that transit will be allowed under increased control , that is, vehicles are pumped up, let's say vehicles are sealed, cars are sealed so that they don't get stuck somewhere on the way , although this is unlikely from the point of view of logistical procedures, it is not profitable, such an operation is carried out like this where to it is a list of countries which introduce certain restrictions and which actually point to the problem of ukrainian grain entering their markets. and where is this grain and where should these trucks

go? -e now in this form sealed as it will be the ports of the ports er yes i thought about it from the very beginning , well it was not actually thought of because this er this export went through our ports and os to the main recipients it was north africa, i.e. those regions that are traditionally well ivy china was once the largest buyer of ukrainian grain before a full-scale invasion sometime during this period . and that is, it changed in the sense that instead of using a sea route, these flows had to be re-orientated through land, but the final recipient is roughly the same, that is, it is not finished, it is not grain, it did not have the same market on the territory of europe that was there, it is just that the route of movement of these fathers has changed, and the day before yesterday it was reported that romania is introducing sealing of transit cargo yes, from monday

, april 24, that is, actually from today, it means they will start pumping vehicles that transport ukrainian agricultural products in transit mode. this saves the situation, it can be implemented in poland and in other countries dissatisfied people in poland. it seems that they have already introduced it. it is one of the most logical and no less painful for us . in my opinion, the means of getting out of this situation, but it is not a fact that those farmers who are protesting will be satisfied with it. what do you see, the nomenclature began with grain and ends with honey and oil and sunflower and everything else. that is, but i think that i am in the european commission. there is another lever , which is called the european commission . free of the movement of goods, and it cannot be that if the goods entered poland , then during their movement in the european union, some specific circumstances arise for their movement there, there is a single

, unified space, and the european commission has such a gingerbread in the form of subsidies, and it may well be at least about this i have already read about it that they will compensate, they will compensate, and those who will play by the rules will receive compensation. if you do not play by the rules, you will not receive compensation , that is, two levers in one and a kanchuk and a gingerbread. and this gives hope that this question will be if it is not decided, well, at least his execution will significantly reduce it. and by how long in time this compensation should be. and which will be applied by the european commission? well, that is , how much do we need to export this grain for now? there is a conditional line for the conditional time limit is, in my opinion, june, before which all these restrictions

were introduced in these countries that introduced them, that is, conventionally speaking, the export of a thin part of the harvest that is now and in june begins to appear , a new grain of the new harvest begins to appear, and there will already be another the market situation, other circumstances, and we have to respond to them somehow, there will be a different response. well, for now, this is the situation. it is clear . well, in the end, taking into account the grain reserves that we have, uh, what we planned to move through the grain corridor through the black sea and so on in fact, after russia will still withdraw from this initiative , we will still hope that we can send everything through the land corridor. there are these possibilities . it will be difficult . it will be difficult.

year, it was difficult, very difficult, it was impossible, now they have expanded, they may have worked, ukrzaliznytsia p- a lot has been done to increase transshipment possibilities, but you need to understand that what a large ship can bring out , a not very large car can bring out there why is this a problem, how can russia leave, for example, the grain agreement, because you remember there was a story when in october it already withdrew from this agreement, but the corridor continued to operate despite the fact that russia said something between ukraine and turkey at the un there there really was such a story, turkey said that you know, well, come out, agree, but our ships are still in the ukrainian fleet to pass the float and do what you want, it is clear that russia did not want to quarrel with turkey, but the problem is that there are elections in turkey and erdoğan now has other problems uh, other such priorities are the biggest than the ukrainian grain agreement, especially after the last devastating

earthquake and after the strengthening of the opposition, that is, he needs to win the elections, and accordingly, russia also knows about it and they will say if erdogan wins most likely, the grain agreement will be extended if rdagan loses, we need peredogan to win. i think that er, this is a matter of the turkish people, who else are they rightly rooting for and not ours, if er, the parish is absolutely serhiy lukyanchuk, the analyst was with us of this broadcast with us, of this new broadcast, and happy birthday serhiy, and for the finale of this hour, don’t forget the past and don’t lose the future, this is how the organizers describe the historical film festival timeless, it takes place on the pechersky hills in the historical museum of the kyiv fortress this is the ninth festival held in ukraine this year, more than a dozen films have been selected for screening at the historical film

festival, our correspondent oleksandr kryvokulskyi also visited for the 9th year in a row, the fireplace halls of the kyiv fortress are hosting the international festival of historical films timelessly here, directors present their films about historical events in ukraine and the world in our history, we talk about the events that took place at the end of the 40s of the last century that this is absolutely not the first bucha in ukrainian history and that in fact, the confrontation between russia and ukraine, the desire of the russians to destroy our nation, it did not begin on february 24, 2022. this year, the program of the festival will show 15 films by ukrainian and foreign directors . currently, the organizers say, the emphasis is on the fight against russian aggression. such films are, in my opinion, the greatest historical cinema. ukraine is progressing again, well, this could not have happened because the current situation with the war requires people to know our past , because without knowledge of our past it is very difficult

to understand when we are going, what we are fighting for and what we want the festival thanks to the support of philanthropists and public organizations. last year, due to a full-scale invasion, the festival was held. it is very important for us that the culture remains kyivans with our nation in spite of the difficulties that we have with the war. that's why i think that without it, if we don't take care of such moments in life, well , i think that we won't have a future already in 2024, the festival will be 10 years old the organizers are sure that they will show a historical film about the ukrainian victory, we dream of telling about the ukrainian victory, i am sure that our colleague olena morozova is also looking forward to this moment olena , hello to you again on our broadcast, tell us what you will talk about in this final news release i congratulate colleagues yes indeed, i am sure that