[000:00:00;00] what is happening around e.e.p. kolomoisky, doesn’t such a decision of the pechersk court of the capital mean that it is necessary to transfer this ukrainian oil drilling e.e. otherwise, such a decision has never been made. this is a very high-quality company that brings in very large amounts of money, and the loss of this company was a surprise for me. i don’t know if it was a surprise for igor valeriyovych, but this is a positive story, again, the reduction of influence kolomoiskyi i'm probably in my head, i don't know the reason why it happened uh, but i relate it to the situation around ukrnafta, ukrnafta, we see how kolomiyskyi's posipaks are very actively

now interfering with work in this company, they are very actively attacking this company in the media trying to uh put everything back, conditionally speaking , how to prove to society that nationalization was the most effective, it is necessary to return the old kolomoisky management. and maybe this is a kind of opposition to the state, which indicates that if you are there, you will interfere with us we will catch up everywhere theoretically, but i don't know in principle well, the main danger is again arma, this is such a problematic story because now we are connected only with corruption, so if we pretend that it is an asset, who or what should be sold as soon as possible at the auction but before - until the end, it is best not to sell it or transfer it to the structure of some vertical integrated company of ukrtoplazta in order for it to be managed qualitatively, because i do not believe in qualitative management on the part of the army, you will not be afraid of the fact that the strengthening of the state is

will lead to the fact that we, like in russia, are creating our own ros-nefts and are powerful state companies, but in fact the role of the state is not only in the economy, but also in the political life of the president, that the political regime in our country was not so democratic. i believe that this is permissible only temporarily until the end of the war after which the big privatization should begin, all these companies should be sold i hope it will be serhiy fursa investbank kir a representative of dregn-capital was on the air of the espresso tv channel as usual on mondays the results of the past week and pave the way for a new economic week. see you tomorrow at 8 am live. andriy yanitskyi with economic news on

the espresso tv channel. together we will win the ukrainian voice of america service time. i am yuliya yarmolenko. himself as a defender of the un charter and the idea of ​​multilateralism, on monday russian foreign minister sergey lavrov presided over a meeting of the un security council dedicated to these issues before the start of at the meeting, the representatives of the eu countries issued a joint statement in which they not only condemned the cynicism of the russians and their deliberate distortion of the norms of international law, but also called on the kremlin to immediately withdraw its troops from ukraine completely and without any conditions. nations to work harder and do more to

prevent russia from undermining the principles of the un charter. we will talk more about this with my colleague iryna solomko, who joins with of the un headquarters, irina, congratulations. congratulations to yulia, let's start with the main thing. how did it happen that the main diplomat is an aggressor country, a country that is waging a full-scale war against its neighbor chairs the un security council and holds a meeting on the protection of the un charter and the idea of ​​multilateralism? this is a direct consequence of the role of the russian federation in the security council , which began on april 1, and it was precisely here that this issue had to be resolved in february, march, and ukraine tried to activists and politicians tried to call on the security council to prevent this, but it happened, and that is why this month and the hunger strike and, accordingly, these open debates and lavrov in the chair of the security council are the consequences of all these events. and why is sergey

lavrov now the head of the council of security at this meeting. this is because russia called a special debate, well, that is, there were such ministerial-level deputations, and it is this that justifies his presence, moreover, he will be present at this meeting not only today, but this will continue. tomorrow there will be a debate on the near east. therefore, this is just the beginning and it is also interesting that, for example, despite the fact that the event itself will be at the ministerial level, in addition to the minister of the united arab emirates and the deputy minister of one country , most of the member states of the security council were after all, they are represented by ambassadors, and this obviously indicates that they do not want labrov’s colleagues to sit behind him at the same table in the security council and probably have joint photos. and serhiy lavrob’s speech itself was quite the same in general, the impression that russia was controversial was that it has a claim to everything, starting with the un itself and, of course

, nato with collective action and even the secretary general, he was mentioned during his speech, and it was also the impression that russia is trying to quarrel with everyone. that is, i don’t know, the tactics are the same, and for example, saying that the western world is undermining the un , that multilateralism and diplomacy are also undermined by these initiatives of western countries regarding the organization of various forums, for example, the form of democracy, in particular, he specified the type and initiatives, therefore, in this context, i had the impression that he was simply trying to outwit everyone, and it is also interesting that he called the event such a western minority or a golden billion, just as he was trying to present that this golden billion is one-eighth and a part of the population of the country and the planets are trying to decide for the rest of the world and what should happen exploits it and adapts its conditions and precisely russia and china are trying to oppose it accordingly yulia iryna

representatives of western countries took advantage of everything on the occasion of direct contact with lavrov and diplomatically explained to him what they think about the actions of his country, what exactly we heard in their speeches, and even before the beginning, in fact, there was a lot, of course, one of the most powerful statements. it was a statement from 27 countries, and the eu members were reminded to at the beginning of the program, and also after that, there was the closest comment from the address of the american ambassador by ledent mozgreenfield . she called russia the big elephant in the room, and that after russia invaded ukraine , she mentioned hryshkovich in her speech, and also during the security council, and she just said that she was present at this press conference before the start of the meeting, sister fished for and just during the speech in that linda thomas greenfield she said that she would like lavrova to look at her in

eyes and saw her suffering, besides, of course, she also talked about ukraine, about the fact that while ukraine, while russia distorts the world in its assessment, and making its statements on this highest platform of international diplomacy, the russian troops still continue their aggression and while we are sitting here this aggression continues while we sit here russian troops continue to kill and injure civilians while we sit here russian forces are destroying critical infrastructure of ukraine sitting here we are preparing for the next bucha the next mariupol the next kherson the next war crime the next atrocity 141 un member states have absolutely clearly stated the goal the full-scale invasion of russia was not self-defense, russia simply wants to redraw international