[000:00:00;00] and about the costumes, but i want to tell you what is actually scandalous from this series a and in this, er, its key moments in general , and as you may know, in recent years, it has become customary to film er people who are still alive, or rather, films about people who are still alive or have recently died , and this is a certain difficulty, because very rarely people are satisfied when they see their own image that is not agreed with them. they say that it is some kind of fantasy. that different kinds of fantasy are allowed there, more or less, we can remember how negatively, sharply, negatively, margaret thatcher’s tape was cut off by the lady, although it is a very high-quality and good film. it received a lot of different awards and rave reviews from

critics, from the audience, but not from margaret thatcher, the same thing it is the princess of monaco , there is a story about the greek and her children said that the movie is terrible this is not our mother, did you invent something at all, they even wanted to somehow ban this movie, but they did not succeed and they sign bikota did not come to his premiere at the cannes film festival, although they were invited . well, what about the fact that art cinema is not a documentary and should not be treated as a depiction of the truth? neflexi from the producers from the authors of the crown series to put huge displays of the sea, i.e. an explanation before each series that this is fiction so that, god forbid, the viewers do not think that this is a true documentary story until now, despite

the appeal of some high-ranking officials very auto people, the authors do not want to make such disclaimers, they did their best to write in the description somewhere on youtube under the trailers that this is certainly not a documentary film, it is not true, but invented, and they say that it is so clear. we should not explain to the audience that a feature film is not a documentary, but you know, there is an opinion that since this series is made with such a pretension to truthfulness that the audience watches and simply cannot help themselves and believe in it, in general, this is a very great strength of cinema, if only they did not shoot it based on this this is evident in the series. it is obvious that with the help of cinema you can influence people with just one wave. we remember our situation with the series servant of the people, when people associated a specific and specific living

person, volodymyr zelenskyi, with the fictional character vasyl holoborodky. it will really be the two of them. they were angry with many people of a certain character and of course the servant of the people , the series uh, he played a huge role in the fact that volodymyr zelensky won the election , at least that's what i think, i'm convinced of this, but let's go back to the crown and before the series 5 season was supposed to come out this is the most scandalous episode so far. because the more the authors get into real time, the more of course there are different dissatisfactions. john major spoke very negatively about the fifth season several times because he is depicted there john major, the former prime minister of britain, and what exactly is his indignation at the fact that several episodes show conversations between him major and prince

charles, who charmed major and convinced him that queen elizabeth she can no longer be corrected, that she is already old-fashioned, that she cannot accept any new challenges, even in spite of her intelligence, wisdom, and so on. and so i somehow persuaded the prime minister that something could be decided with me and that charles became the monarch and queen elizabeth left somewhere to retire, john major only when he heard this he immediately started saying that this is a vile lie, that this is not true, it never happened, at first he himself stated this in various media and then issued an official release in which let's be these are the words, let's have them let's listen to the discussions between the monarch and the prime minister are completely private and will always remain so for sarah john , none of the scenes you depict are absolutely accurate, this is a fiction, pure and simple

, john menschera was warmly supported by judi dench , an actress who is not only authoritative, but also a good friend of camila and brinza chalza. and she once played queen victoria when she was preparing. that's how she got to know and befriend the royal couple. between historical accuracy and gross sensationalism that there is a risk that the audience will actually think that what they are shown on the tv screen is historical truth sir john major is not alone in his fears that the last season of the crown will be an inaccurate and harmful presentation of history really the closer the drama gets until now, the more it seems that it aims to blur the line between historical

accuracy and gross sensationalism although many understand that the crown is a brilliant but fictional account of events i am afraid that a significant number of viewers, especially abroad, can accept her version as completely true, in addition, judi dench adds that for netflix, in her opinion, it's time to revise your opinion for the sake of some moral and ethical principles for the sake of the family, for the sake of the nation, and offers them to realize that if you lost a loved one very recently , but after a few months they start washing her dirty laundry on a small scale , for the whole country, for the whole world, of course, it was about the fact that the fifth season of the crown was released literally a few months after the death the elizabeths persuaded the authors to postpone this show, but they said no, we will not postpone anything on the specified dates

. well, peter morgan and netflix responded to all these institutions, they emphasized again and again that our series is a fiction. we do not understand how it is can be taken as historical as true as uh well as that which depicts reality as it is i think we all have to admit that the 90s were a difficult time for the royal family and king charles almost certainly has painful memories of this period, but this does not mean that history will be cruel to him or to the monarchy, personally in my point of view, despite all the moments that the royal families may not like in this series, they do not comment on it at all, by the way, any comments there are retold as if from the circle of the royal family , as if the prince said that, as if the prince had said everything. by the way , it was reported that the prince of faith was very

dissatisfied with the display of quarrels between the characters of his mother and his father, they say that it causes another kind of moral trauma for him when he sees this and he believes that his parents are exploited and presented in a false, simplified form in order to make money. personally, i think that on the contrary, this series is shown with great respect for the members of the royal family, they are all depicted by the authors so, even in spite of their ah careless steps, ill-conceived or real meanness sometimes even or some disgusting character traits, all these characters are still described as positive and likeable and you preach to them as viewers, and it seems to me that the authors and

screenwriters of this series, first of all, aimed not only to entertain the audience, not only to make such a loud series, but also to allow their viewers to empathize with the members of the royal family not only the british family, but in principle to show the monarchy as uh and monarchs as people who are so obliged to society in general and live such an unhappy life because they can't just live the way they want, they can't often get married yet to marry whoever they want and this is exactly what their life is for which they are ready. far from everyone and far from everyone would like to share such a fate that the british monarchs have, so i think that for the royal family

this series, on the contrary, plays a very positive role in the image because, i will repeat, even the queen herself, despite the fact that they show that she ruined her sister's personal life there, did not allow her to marry the person she loved, that she made many mistakes, the queen is often described as a truly outdated person who i don't understand some of the technical points, technical novelties, but in principle, some new modern views, but in the end, towards the end of the season, the queen shows that it's not even the most important thing, because her mind, her wisdom, her data, politics they don't make her a great monarch, powerful, such a powerful political figure, despite any of her flaws, hmm, she is still, well, no one can compare to her. let's just say so, and this is the conclusion that constantly echoes in the crown series, therefore

, frankly, i am in the place of the royal family would be i am very grateful that such a series exists because it works very, very well for their image. by the way , from my point of view, they form their image quite successfully with the help of cinema . the serial film is a documentary already about themselves about their lives, they say so at the beginning that there are only many different rumors and gossip around us, that we are ready to tell our true story in order to stop all these stupid thoughts about us and depicted they are a wonderful couple, you know, an attractive couple who love each other so much that the two of them are ready to stand against the whole world. the audience usually likes this too, and if you look at the comments

and reviews of the audience on the series about harry and meghan , there is simply a lot of admiration. cinema is generally a very good way to build a good image, you know, but hmm, we will actually wait for the new seasons of the corona series, not for this sixth one. will approach the story of megan harry to this scandalous story. it will be interesting to see how they will describe it and, most importantly, how they will react in society to what is on the screen, well, now let's talk about the image of ukraine, which is created with the help of cinema , and you know here everything is enough, on the one hand, it is comforting because we have an extraordinary history of cinema, we now see a lot of different premieres and many people who simply describe their admiration for what they see on

the screens, we see crazy success ah cartoon mavka forest song we see the success of the films panfir luxembourg luxembourg eh these are all incredible reviews about these tapes but on the other hand we also understand that we can lose all this very easily why because as i said at the beginning of our program and state policy is so ineffective and untalented that well, it's just that many filmmakers don't, uh, don't understand what the future holds for us in two years, it's also the cannes film festival in our country, and there in the program there is as much as one short film from this is a ukrainian film as it was. sit was directed by our director anastasiya solonevych and her polish colleague demyan kotsur. well, it's about refugees. i understand the film. it tells about the experiences

of the author herself. it will be interesting to watch it. but it's a shame that it's only for the entire cannes film festival. one ukrainian short film, marina vrody's new film, the selectors rejected it and did not accept it. marina vrody herself says that it is because of last year's scandal at this film festival , which was organized by ukrainian cinematographers ah, because there was a boycott and serhii laznytsia, then you remember he was expelled from the ukrainian film academy, the weaving film festival opened with a film called z , the ukrainians forced to rename this film , and the organizers could not understand. russian directors were invited , although the organizers said that they refused official delegations, but in the end they did not refuse the directors themselves

. russian soldiers in action and ukrainian filmmakers protested against all this, from my point of view, it was quite appropriate, they did it quite intelligently , but here we see the situation with the cannes film festival, they do not accept ukrainian films, and it must be said that the cannes film festival is quite conservative, moreover frankly, he is invested in a lot of russian money, and that is why we see a complete dependence on the russians, if we talk about the world market in general, world cultural events, then they really have a very there is great sentiment towards the russians, there is also a great deal of financial dependence on the russians, that is why we can see russian films and various russian exhibitions at many of them. not to mention the fact that the organizers are constantly trying to unite ukrainian artists with russian ones and arrange some kind of discussion about this, we know everything, but everything

- after all, state policy is very decisive , and our image abroad largely depends on it. it is now, we can simply state that and now and even more so later, we will significantly lose on this film market to the world a-a unfortunately, but still, we will hope that the ukrainian film community will somehow unite and take some steps to i don't know how to change the management of the state cinema in order to make this management work much more effectively . i have friends. i wish you a nice and peaceful evening

. all the best, join the community with a ukrainian view of the world, become a sponsor of the youtube channel espresso. and this is access to exclusive content, personal thanks, pinned comments, special icons there, the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click to sponsor and become part of the community with a ukrainian point of view , the war raised its head again in europe, reminding us of the darkest hours of our history, franz 24 constantly covers events in ukraine, our team on the ground and in the studio will inform you about the dynamics of events, watch the latest news from franz 24 in ukrainian on

espresso, vasyl zima's long broadcast my name is vasyl zima, two hours of airtime and my my colleague is with you until 21:00 for two hours of your time, we will talk about the most important things, two hours to learn about the war, serhiia zhoretska joins our broadcast, the military results of the day and what is the world like? what is there in the world ? borshchagivka he talks about the economy during the war and new sports evgeny pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of favorite presenters about culture during the war lina is ready to talk or something else that many have become strange, maybe the weather will give us some optimism, mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, and we will also have distinguished guests of the studio today , volodymyr ogrysko, if everything goes well, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl's big broadcast in the winter , a project for intelligent and caring people, in the evening,

the most expresso about history russia for a second does not have the right for a simple person to condemn their sovereign, i remind you, there is not a single cat in russia , a dog that was born putin's times , zabutyn's times, yes, russians in general are very mysterious, the people want to pretend if we with words it's just scary, they just want to show that they are strong because they can feed anyone shit and say that it's jam, we'll live in ukraine and the car mother-in-law and woman love dima, which dima with you , then the series hello friends we are going to the vovchan community today and we are finally going

with an escort and we will try to record stories about how the counteroffensive took place here . i am performing the duties of sahar kharkiv of the separate territorial defense brigade. and where we are going, we are going towards the border with the aggressor state. for which we recently and very successfully drove him, but on the left side we see a free kharkiv region. on the right side, we also see a free kharkiv region. and on the way we are also going to the free kharkiv oblast, it has also recently been liberated, i think already forever from the occupiers of the same people who drove them abroad , the lightning-fast liberation of kharkiv oblast is a top topic not only for ukraine but also for the whole

world that yesterday there were huge riots the territories are occupied by the occupying forces, now they are controlled by ukraine, and the russian federation itself admits this, judging by the map, russia left vovchansk in particular. what is your history, the armed forces , i entered the armed forces directly on february 24, you know it is quite difficult to get up in the morning and think, damn, i have to join the army, but i joined the army and here one is now from the same day he sent his family or you from the same day i serve there during this time , he changed the troops there for several years , he was one of his signalmen, and he happily felt it in his native sapper platoon, an engineer on a sapper platoon until i, as a journalist, was pulled out to work on the media field of niva, and in front of us was a car like this little lada , in which we actually went with him as a colleague

, so to speak, to catch up with the advance of the ukrainian troops. it was before us in our upia they took a tank into the wilderness and threw it what was your life like until february 24 much less interesting much less saturated he had much fewer men in uniform but i didn't have a machine gun now i have one and what else changed to, well, the salary is a little better, i have to say, than peaceful life. you have that i worked as a journalist. media workers , unfortunately, in our country, they do not get much, unlike the military. well , in principle. that when this offensive began. well, many people from these two subdivisions, uh, these are people who live directly in these territories that were

occupied, that is, people literally went to vacate their homes there. and that's why it all turned into some kind of crazy chase by force, they ran away, they just finished throwing the guys to the front, the guys to the front, they covered the entire unit, including the management staff, which is not there, it is located directly at zero , the whole thing broke straight ahead and in such a frantic rhythm, no not having time to eat or sleep, they just rushed towards the border . where are you from? i always answer this question .

let's say it exists in the current aggressive imperial format, then of course there will never be complete security for kharkiv , as practice shows, every time the russians retreat as much as they overburden themselves with such important military issues as washing machines for an indesit washing machine, a real russian soldier takes with you, even in the field , even in battle, refrigerators, televisions, other, well , directly important engineering engineering inventions are intended directly, of course , for the conduct of hostilities. i imagine there you can already collect a whole mechanized refrigerator division of irons from the underwear and socks division, they sweep everything away, even women's underwear is grabbed like savages , you can put the little ones to sleep, for example, there are several years of earless underwear and socks

. yes, we have earless ones in our arsenal. the fighting army directly on the battlefield, the russians why did they leave the ammunition, the shots before the pg shot, plus there are also cartridges or cents, the remains of the artillery, automatic weapons, bullets for them , body armor, btr helmets, there is another apc, here is another apc and there are many other useful points useful for military affairs than refrigerators. it is possible that this question is because the russians are very fond of talking about the low social level

of the neighboring army . grain, but for some reason they don't want to serve in their own army, and this is considered mobilization , now it is considered a very unprestigious thing , but accordingly, the poorest , most abandoned, did not have time, did not have time to go, and are already fighting among themselves, are going to study, go to the army to fight kitchen boxers in other words, and this whole audience is directly finished and poor, she actually goes to the army and then meets directly with ukrainians with people who are also richer in terms of social status there. she begins to actively envy them and tries to bring as many home with her as possible. well trophies, but if in the ukrainian

army, the trophy is when you are for trophies, then for the russians it is a washing machine, sorry , there are no beds in this location and there are no people there, there are no beds, you understand i agree the army came to fight for the homeland, it still has enormous self-confidence and it was so self-confident that it did not build any additional lines of defense. that is, where the ukrainian army is, where any normal army is, where i don’t even know, there are dozens of aunts barricading themselves in their own apartment, i don’t know from the robber , they can understand that it is necessary to transfer several doors in order to create several working defenses of russia, they were simply not created because the russians thought that well, what about us people who know how to sew two ratna check collars, i see how boys with green

and black threads are sewn, i see how they can hang white tags on a white branch, only there are people's underpants and what are there . well, i don't know, there they invented the shape of grass , the color green, some general will come now -lieutenant er, they told us to paint the grass green because the grass is not green enough. and if our president was driving, we would paint the leaves on the trees . gunter offensive, what kind of operation was here in general, that is, in this direction, and that is, we said that there were practically no losses here , and why why did this happen? because after all we have we have a certain strategic tactical genius ukrainian commander of various levels and the heroism of ukrainian soldiers motivated

by what they self-confident, they simply did not expect that they would be attacked, they worked very well as a trio, they have such huge losses. and we only have three three-hundredths of this morning viloske in this morning viloske we made such a fuss there, destroyed the officer corps , they ran and shouted there the special unit works without the unit works, this is the former loaders for you who are in the army and did not serve. and who else are there to be lawyers, firemen, sales managers , the special unit works, i understand. it seems to me that the problem is that all the world media they they wrote about ukrainian, about the fact that ukraine is glad to start contact sooner or later, but simply that most of the personnel of the russian army do not read english and ukrainian, so they could not read about this counteroffensive or

prove it directly to their military leadership in time. and literally their first line of defense was breached there . they immediately began to run away when they were running away from the ford. this is not an army, this is not people who are leaving in an organized and efficient manner. i really do not believe what this army is for at all could somehow exist in these territories and not even get lost there, for example, just because the russian army doesn't get lost in the ukrainian forests. i don't know. good afternoon, we have one soldier here. the mother-in-law and the woman love dima, we took a picture with him, if possible, what kind of dima would it be? he was also seen somewhere along the way , he was filming. i am in the city of balaklia. no