[000:00:00;00] directly there by breaking diplomatic relations. i think this is not our method in the current situation . it is clear. let's also analyze what putin said . we have already cited a few of his quotes, and in particular, he said that it was allegedly against russia that they launched a war, and not russia attacked ukraine as a whole. it is possible to evaluate today's putin's messages on red square, well, on the one hand, it's all very gray, on the other hand, it's a militant delusion , because what's actually happening in putin's words, you understand, uh, we were attacked, but we 're carrying out a special military operation, well you know, i have the impression that putin's speech demonstrated the intellectual dystrophy of the kremlin because

for a very long time they relied primarily on their fellow citizens who live in a certain information ghetto and who can be fed whatever they want but well, we also realize that putin's speech was listened to and read carefully in other capitals of the world, and putin shows himself to be weak. to hold this parade if it is such a personification of the weakness of the army in particular, many people note that there is not enough equipment and it is not as threatening as it always happens. it is not one of these magnificent parades on red square again. so why was it held and done at all

because may 9 is the main holiday of the russian political calendar, and if he doesn't do it, the question arises, what is happening in russia, that is, well, imagine a wedding without a bride or groom, that's actually the whole answer, that is, to cancel may 9, which on today's moment. well, it seems to me that in russia there is a more important holiday than russia day. well, in my opinion, it is simply impossible . in particular, the german political scientist serhiy sumlin spoke about the fact that there is supposedly no lack of high-tech equipment in general , there is a lack of equipment at this parade, allegedly called to show the russians themselves that all the equipment is now at the front, that it is very serious, serious that the russians, on the contrary, need to mobilize, but it is still important to hold this parade, was it possible that such

a message was also planted and would it work if well, i think that a message based on a historical analogy would work better when there was a parade in the 41st year, on november 7 in moscow , then the participants of the parade, in any case, according to the official legend, moved to the front after the parade because the battle for moscow was going on, that is, if you show that the participants of the parade immediately go back to fight in ukraine , then it would be a stronger message, but here russia tells everyone, well, literally a month ago, ria novosti wrote that russian troops received hundreds of tanks, including the newest tanks, a breakthrough, but at the same time, ria referred the source of the news is not named, that is, it was a propaganda thing, because if they received hundreds of tanks, they could not allocate 20

for passing in the parade calculations. well , the question really remains whether there are these tanks at all or if they are really allegedly all at the front , this is exactly what they are trying to do to discuss, in particular, on different 100g channels, different , the same, so-called warlords, i wanted to ask separately about kazakhstan, because unofficially, the same strilkov warlords, for example , write about the fact that allegedly, well, even i some threats are allegedly being made towards kazakhstan by those who are quoting, i will now quote let's deal with ukraine and you are next in kazakhstan. is this at all something worth discussing? is this really some kind of preparation of the ground for something? well, they can promise and parrot new guinea will be the next swords senegal, or even more so in africa, there are units or vk wagner, you know, there are more chances than kazakhstan. well, because there is china and china. i

think in my gut that similar focuses will be allowed, but what can this indicate or can it just be some kind of such grassroots and the initiatives of these contributors, no, these are not grassroots initiatives of the contributors, because there are certain such movements in relation to kazakhstan, they were observed for the first year and after 2014, they were also, that is, they took over russian territory. kazakhstan, therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate its possibly imperial sentiments in this way . moreover, russia likes to threaten the internationalization of the russian-ukrainian war, saying that we will ignite the flames of the world war, just like after the october revolution, they said, we are all bourgeois, the world fire is raging, but somewhere now

it also sounds like a refrain. thank you very much . yevgeny mavda, the director of the institute of world politics , talked about how the victory parade went in moscow, thank you, thank you, one of the units of the russian regular army allegedly ran away from the position in bakhmut, thus exposing the flank in the city , the head of the wagner communist party group , yevgeny prigozhyn, stated this in his recent video address, where he also talked about the general situation in bakhmut, among other things prigozhin says that pvt. wagner allegedly provides only 10% of the ammunition that is needed, and that the group will probably leave its positions in bakhmut in a few days if the situation is not corrected with the provision of supplies. and the ministry of defense of the russian federation. meanwhile, the military personnel of the armed forces of ukraine who joined our airwaves earlier say that they do not feel the alleged hunger for ammunition among

the mercenaries of the wagner pvk. why did the russian troops, whether regular or the fighters of the pvk pvk wagner, not succeed in capturing bakhmut by may 9 and how the situation at the front can develop further , we are in touch with the head of the center for military and legal research oleksandr musienko good evening good evening indeed russia is not was able to take bakhmut by may 9 , the ukrainian armed forces talked about the fact that such is the intention. and they are conducting military operations in two directions. now in bakhmut, there are two goals. first, the usual goal was, let’s say, to give a basis for putin to talk about the victory. because putin , during the parade of honor, spoke precisely about the so -called sbu, and not about the second world war, and

so it is obvious that if they added to the text that bakhmut means they captured and so on. and they continue the liberation of donbas, how do they talk about it there, all this nonsense? of course, for the propaganda effect, it was much better, but not this happened and it is clear that in any case this is once again a reputational image loss and a failure of promises made by the russian military, as for the second aspect that continues to be implemented, and that is why russia continues to storm the positions despite the bahmut despite the serious failures and losses that they bear in this way, the russian command thinks that they will pull out ukrainian reserves in these directions , involve them in hostilities in a serious , rather fierce confrontation that is ongoing there, and

these reserves will be precisely those that were prepared for counteroffensive so, in this way, the enemy thinks that they will be able to postpone or make impossible the ukrainian counteroffensive, in fact, these calculations are wrong. but again, in russia, they grasp at it, thinking that in principle it will save and potentially either postpone or disrupt the counteroffensive, that is, in fact, i would say that it is possible for someone strange or it's a paradoxical thing, but today what is happening under the command of marinka and partly in the liman direction is no longer the large-scale offensive of russian troops that began in february of this year, but it is necessary to consider it in context. from this point of view, this is a defensive operation, they are attacking for the purpose of defense , for the purpose of preserving their positions in other directions, so that there is no counteroffensive, and that all ukrainian forces are involved here , patient. and how then can you evaluate the statements prigozhina who says that allegedly a-a unit

of the russian federation has exposed the flank of bakhmuti and allegedly himself in mercenary pvk wagner may leave this position. does this fit into this logic of defensive defensive tactics ? filter and filter, i will explain why through what prism, through the prism of the fact that he is currently fighting a serious battle, in fact , for well, let's say, changes in the defense, for what well, for the fact that he is running out of strength, a large number of wagnerites have been destroyed by ukrainian troops , he is running out of attack aircraft he simply does not have time just to recruit them in those places where he could do it there or in those countries where they do it, and in fact they try to do it all over the world well,

mostly in the countries of asia or africa people end up with no one to fight, he is looking for someone to transfer responsibility to, he begins to transfer responsibility to the ministry of defense of russia, and the ministry of defense of russia , in turn, says listen. yes, you wagnerites promised that you would take bakhmut more than once, even more than once they took him at the word well, let's go ahead , storm further and no one i don't care how many of you are left there, there was no order to retreat , there is an order to stand to the death, that's about it and that's why. this is the whole story between them. i will continue that there are local tactical successes in bahmut of our defenders - this is true, but the situation must be understood in the conditions of the battles of urban development. it can change. the initiative passes to us. the enemy transfers additional forces. support uses phosphorous bombs . what they are doing now is burning and destroying everything. we can go somewhere. the initiative has passed to the enemy. and he can keep it up several times a month and so far the situation is exactly like this, that is, there are tactical successes of

our defenders. this can indeed be admitted, but this does not mean that there has been a total the defeat of the russian troops in bakhmut, in particular, they say about the large use of aviation compared to other points of the front. well, in fact , this is the hottest point of the front . if we talk about aviation. are active now, and in combat operations or do you know about something else, i have to tell you as follows that on the advice of russia, this is a propaganda action, a staged show, a performance, which, by the way , few people use on such a scale as they do in russia, they are openly looked at in the world as barbarians by some savages, in this sense it is true and what i want to say about the parade it is impossible to neither confirm nor deny has it become much well, first of all, the technology has become much less in russia

this is obviously confirmed by everyone and from the sources it was inflicted by the ukrainian military on the other hand . it is actively used in combat operations. well, for example, t-14 armata tanks or, for example, strategic intercontinental rockets for the delivery of nuclear weapons , or the same su-57 aircraft that russia has never used in combat operations, or hunter drones, and so on. that is, this is a propaganda show of puffing cheek to demonstrate that russia is apparently strong , they have a lot of weapons and that the world is afraid of them and perceives it really from this position, but today the world simply does not react, you understand,

after the ukrainian military successfully they shot down, for example, a dagger of another russian wunderwaffe, which was positioned as a super weapon that has no analogues and that no air defense system is capable of hitting the parade increases their effectiveness and the use of these weapons in and use in combat conditions , you mentioned the dagger and the fact that the air force of ukraine was able to shoot down this missile, and yuriy ignat , the spokesman of the air force, in particular, said that when all the anti-aircraft systems that were promised by the western partner will arrive in ukraine. ukraine may have the best air defense in the world, but from the point of view of missile attack tactics, if this is really the case, can we say that this tactic will exhaust itself and russia will stop using missiles so actively

i think that the explanations will not stop , despite the fact that they have a shortage of missiles and problems with their production, as long as they have the slightest opportunity to produce at least 20-30 missiles per month, possibly more according to the estimates of various researchers, they will do this and as a result they will try to attack ukraine with missiles and martyrs, and in the end, the tactics will not change here , will the ukrainian system be able to become one of the best in the world, i really agree that there is potential for this, but does this mean that 100% guaranteed, fully protected unfortunately, no, we cannot guarantee that we will be protected by 90, even 95%, but there are some 5-10% risks. they will still remain and russia will try even if out of 25 missiles, two a 23 shot down they will still try and is it not that much of a concern for the russian army

? no, it will not be so effective, definitely. well, let's do it. we evaluate the effectiveness by what criteria. let's see. for five months , for five months, russia tried to neutralize ukrainian energy facilities. in order to actually cause some kind of apocalypse here and plunge ukraine into a total bloc , it was not possible five months of frenzied bombing effects no did this affect the fact that russia refused to missile strikes may not be on objects of energy infrastructure, but in another way, they are in this madness in their stubbornness , that is, the action itself is important for them, it is important for them to demonstrate that in fact all the missiles are wrong, they have tags and so on and make reports to the superiors leadership about what to see how we apply somewhere we hit there and so on thank you very much for joining our air and analyzing the ability of russia in the future to carry out missile strikes and

continue military operations in particular in bakhmut we were contacted by oleksandr musienko, head of the center for military and legal research, thank you, approximately 60% of ukrainians believe that the war can end only in the event of a victory over russia without any compromises with the aggressor country, at the same time , among those who consider the euromaidan a just uprising against the dictatorship, almost 72% believe that no compromise can be made with russia, this is stated in the results of a poll conducted by the rumzkov center together with the democratic initiatives foundation, in particular , about 92% believe in the victory of ukraine in the war of ukrainians, this survey was conducted against the background of the expectation of a ukrainian counterattack, the success of which will depend, as analysts note, on the further support of ukraine by western

partners and, therefore, on the ability of ukraine to liberate its own territories. of the democratic initiative oleksiy garan good evening and also a professor of the kyiv-mohyla academy. yes, thank you for joining our eten, i want to start with what a survey which, in particular, and where the initiative was conducted, states that almost 72% of ukrainians among those who consider euromaidan a just uprising against the dictatorship do not support any compromises with russia without the complete liberation of all territories of ukraine. to continue repelling russian aggression and to carry out ukrainian offensives in the future, then this is actually not a simple question. do you understand the mandate? figures of faith in victory, in the fact that it is impossible to compromise with the enemy, that our victory

means the liberation of our territory , returning to the border in 1991 is very good, and it gives our authorities the opportunity to talk about it at international negotiations , because when it starts someone there is talking in the west, well, they say, let's look for some compromises from russia, here you can refer to public opinion, and this is a very, very strong argument, what will happen next , how will the situation develop? what depends on aa successful actions of ukraine i specifically do not use counteroffensive because it is as if a one-moment action how will the dynamics of this war develop because really if, uh, if

we have military successes and, let's say, fall on the russian front - this is one situation if this is not enough if let's say the situation will be a war, it will continue, it will drag on, ah, hmm, a different situation may arise, there will be pressure on the ukrainian authorities, of course, and er, well, we will have to look for some er, i would say such a certain diplomatic maneuvering. well, for example so look, we can say well, first of all, we always say that we are ready for negotiations on the deoccupation of ukrainian territory a-a, that is , we can talk about the withdrawal of russian soldiers a-a when we sometimes hear that there will be no negotiations with the enemy before the withdrawal of russian soldiers troops well, then there will be no negotiations at all, yes, and here i am saying a lot that

depends on the military situation, the situation on the fronts, that is why i am saying here, you know when i am talking with western journalists or with countries of the global south where we were recently with by the ukrainian delegation, and here i am speaking a bit more flexibly, as soon as russia declares its readiness to withdraw troops and begins to do so or begins to take real steps to de-escalate the conflict, that is, it will stop bombing ukrainian civilians, what we saw today, on may 9, they bombarded us, will withdraw troops from the zaporizhzhia npp will return ukrainian children, unblock grain corridors , that is, if we see that there are real steps , then we can start talking about negotiations, but again about negotiations about the deoccupation of ukrainian territory

for example, i am also talking about the fact that when i tell us and what will you do with crimea ? well, i say that listen, the situation is clearly ukrainian crimea and this is confirmed by all the results of the survey, but we can talk about the fact that, by the way, i literally talked today on this topic with arfat chubarov with the head of the forest of the crimean tatar people about the fact that crimea will have autonomy in which the crimean tatars will receive the proper rights, but the rights of russians and ukrainians will also be protected . that is, we can submit it as our flexible position, we are not selling anything here, we clearly say that crimea is ukraine. but crimea will be real autonomy, not as it was before 2014, with a bias towards the russians and

discrediting of rights, etc. and real autonomy where rights will be held by three communities and we let's ensure this democratic crimea, ukrainian crimea, this is what we can present as our compromise position at the negotiations, so once again, uh, let's say yesterday, well , i need to check this, but it seems that podalyak said that we don't need to talk about autonomy , that's all, really, about autonomy, see just the mood now in ukraine because the word autonomy of crimea is associated with what the russians actually did there and what the pro-russian forces did there seems to me to be just right spoke with arfat chubarov, who is also worried about the situation, and we agreed that we should not say that crimea will be deprived of autonomy, on the contrary, we will provide real autonomy, but

taking into account the rights of the crimean tatars as the original population of this territory, and once again we can present such a position as a compromise for our international partners, although in fact it is a completely ukrainian position, but we can present it as a compromise , so uh , look again. the integrity of ukraine, no concessions, and really no concessions to russia, whether territorial or federalization already, thank god. nobody is saying that we will not go to crimea, but some

flexible moments to say yes we are ready to start negotiations as soon as the russians really show that they are ready for de-escalation to understand the real steps i want to have time to talk about some other questions that were asked in this survey and in particular about personalities, there was such a question as to who played an important role in the defense of ukraine and in the first place with a big friend is a-and the answer is president zelenskyi , in second place is commander-in-chief valery zaluzhnyi , and then in third place with nine percent is the spokesman of the president's office, mykhailo podolyak, he overtook the minister and nine hundred thousand more serhiy prituka serhiy prytula exactly yes and they overtook the minister of defense oleksiy reznikov in particular and the former spokesman of the opposition oleksiy arestovych stands higher, for example, the head of the ministry of foreign affairs dmytro kuleba why yes, well, this says that if the television picture has a presence on social networks the scandalousness continues, it continues to work, that is, in fact , there are small percentages of dropouts and arrestees

specifically in this matter. yes, but it is quite symptomatic, and that's why, well, you know, this is a consequence of our democracy, because we remain democracy is unheard of democracy during the war and martial law, that's why the media characters actually get uh, it's not deserved in my opinion, but they get such percentages , the attitude of the ukrainians, but i was pleased another question when we asked, they asked and what was the biggest factor that disrupted russian plans, the first place from by a huge margin , the armed forces of ukraine took second place - this is the ukrainian people as a whole , volunteers took third place, and the central government had half the result

. and we deciphered the central government is the president and the government here the ukrainian partisans are in fifth place. moreover, in the east, the ukrainian partisans have overtaken the president and the government, and i think that this just means that the ukrainians perfectly understand that, first of all, they owe themselves and the armed forces of ukraine. of course, when we ask about personnel well, here, objectively, the commander-in-chief, president zelenskyi, comes in first place, and the commander-in-chief also comes in second place, but valery zaluzhny of the armed forces of ukraine. that is, it is clear that the applicants should answer such a question briefly. here, according to the survey, 82% believe the russian president as a kind of modern hitler, and another 12% rather agree with that definition, that is, only 94% of ukrainians draw parallels of some degree or another between putin and hitler. what can you feel about it now? please answer very briefly, well, very briefly. from a scientific point of view

i will honestly say this is not very correct, but from an emotional point of view. and from the point of view of this aggression that putin is carrying out , it says how ukrainians perceive him. it is very important that the opinion of ukrainians is unanimous, that is, the war led to the fact that there are regional differences, they remain, but they are very much leveled off, and in particular, on this issue, the opinion of ukrainians is unanimous, although we still have time , ukrainians. time and what should happen, well, look, if you ask me as a scientist, then scientists will distinguish between fascism and nazism, yes, that is, fascism in the classical version

of musleni, nazism is what hitler did, and if we will compare like this, then i think that from a scientific point of view, the classification of putin’s regime and putin himself is a fascist state, let’s call it a nazi state . well, two things: there are no concentration camps here , there is no extermination, mass extermination of people , and its own population, and so on, but as a fascist state the state is quite possible to talk about it, not all scientists in the west agree with this but i think that russia itself gives the argument here unfortunately yes and it opens the eyes of the west as well, but we can explain what fascism is. well, we now say that fascism today is racism . thank you very much indeed . this is how the verkhovna rada officially defined this regime in the kremlin

. ukraine will not celebrate victory day on may 9 instead it will now be the day of europe, journalists of the present tv channel , which is a project of radio liberty, asked passers-by on the streets of kyiv how they were before we are going to europe and i have a positive attitude towards it, i have nothing against it. i am very glad that we are leaving russia and in general it was so long ago, to be honest, i was already born after the war, that is how menya , my father fought now, that's may 9 , naty. they're doing this here and there . with these tapes, the crazy academy. of the eighth let him mark the eighth if he