[000:00:00;00] line to export its grain abroad, the debate turned into a discussion about how to save european markets from ukrainian grain, many deputies spoke, including representatives of five of our neighbors , poland, hungary, slovakia, romania, as well as bulgaria, through which these same roads pass of solidarity from the european union and from ukraine to the european union and the world, and actually the european deputies, in fact, all , in fact, the majority of the speakers, declared that it is necessary to save european farmers, that ukrainian grain harms european markets , causes damage to european farmers and it is necessary to somehow regulate its supply to european markets, and he took part in the debates at

the invitation of the members of the european parliament, eu commissioners for agriculture yana shvey tikhovskyi and he began to assure the deputies that ukraine itself will not be able to supply grain to the european markets without control, and that the european commission has prepared measures that will help european farmers in this, in particular. he promised that the european commission will still continue the ban on the export of grain and oil crops to the five countries i have already mentioned, this ban was established last week, the second of may 2023, and was supposed to be in effect until june 5, but the european commissioner promised that the ban will be extended and also he even promised that it is possible that the european commission, at the request of some states , will be able to consider other types of products that may also pose a threat and possibly regulate them somehow. and thirdly, he promised european farmers

an additional 100 million euros from these five states support to the more than 50 that they have already received, and that is, in fact, today's debates, although they were interesting, but for ukrainian farmers, for the ukrainian magazine, they are not very comforting, yes. but the main thing is to control this process in a timely manner and warn our politicians and our fellow romanians, in general , the faith in the parliament was considered as such the thing is the interests of ukrainian farmers. yes , we understand that we are not just a neighboring country , we are a country that is a candidate for membership in the european union, ursula fund derlin is coming to us, there is no euroscepticism here but i would like europe, at the most institutional financial level, to think about some additional ways, for example, of helping our agricultural industry , of course, the speeches in

the euro session hall were also about this, but again, with a focus on the interests of european farmers, and they talked about what are the temporary measures taken by the european commission for a year or for a certain period of time to ban the export of something from ukraine to europe, that it does not work , what is needed? consider these issues systematically so that all parties are actually satisfied, and i would also like to emphasize that european commissioner janusz i tikhovsky reminded the deputies that free trade with ukraine did not start in 2022, that back in 2014, when ukraine was striving for european integration, in 2014, the ukraine-eu free trade zone was introduced, and it was then that the majority of ukrainian agro-industry products

were supposed to start trading in the european union without customs duties. that is, it is not what was introduced last year, it was already introduced in 2014, the only thing that changed . last year, because of the war, they also established zero fines on wheat, and wheat was still regulated before, and as the european commissioner said at that time, ukraine attacked from the north, south and east and we simply could not close ukraine's door to the west, so if last year the door was opened wide, this year the door is closed a little, but they are preparing some kind of systemic solution so that ukraine, as a future member of the eu, could trade peacefully with the states of the union. by the way it is also interesting that, for example, at that time, if the five countries poland, hungary, slovakia, romania, and bulgaria were oversaturated with ukrainian agriculture, then, for example , representatives of spain spoke out and said, "we don't have enough ukrainian grain, and what's more

, prices are high in spain because of the fact that so far it is currently prohibited until june 5 , and the european commission simply promised that this defense would be extended for how long, specifically from the representative of the european commission, according to which it was said that until the end of the year, because the new harvest is being prepared and they are already afraid

newborns were also told about this, a new crop is being prepared from ukraine, you should be ready for it. well, they are getting ready . just a minute more, and some countries were talking about what other ukrainian products are potentially dangerous for them , the european commission informed about it, for example, in bulgaria , ukrainian fruits vegetables dairy products czech republic chicken meat and eggs and romania flour honey sugar oil this is the same thank you dear tatiana for this warning and for this extremely interesting informational analysis of what today took place in brussels, tetyana vysotska, our correspondent in the european union, in particular in brussels, joined live, let's go further, leonid kozachenko, president of the agrarian confederation, people's deputy of the previous convocation, with us glory to ukraine, mr. leonida, glory to the heroes that the coordination platform regarding the export of ukrainian grain in the european union is talking about this, extremely difficult debates continued in the european parliament well, we would like

to ask you not about the declarations of intentions of our friends and partners, but about the realities in particular it is about how easy or difficult it will be to work as an agriculturist now , based on the entire european market, and indeed, such difficult times are coming for agriculturists, because the lack of an opportunity to sell corruption, which is the best, limits us in order to get the harvest in the current year it is proper and we have a lot of problems, first of all internal problems. the most important is , of course, the war, and then various issues related to this, fiscal monetary policy , but trade, the sale of products, which makes it possible to immediately receive the money that we need

needed in order to finish the spring and field work, we have already done half of it, but the quality of these works is not what it should be and to finish them. we need funds for this, we have a lot of unsold products and this creates problems for us, well, at the same time it must be said that these are problems not only of ukraine, they go beyond the borders of our state, because no one on the world market has canceled the problem of food shortages and we were one of the main granaries of the world market, as they called us, and what putin is doing is a war with the whole world, it is not just a war with ukraine. because of such economic, let's say, types of weapons. and this is a war with the whole world , and it is necessary to involve not only turkey and the un, but other countries that must put pressure on russia so that it opens the grain corridor so that it does not engage in those, well, no one in the world, even those who vote for them when they support russia

cannot understand the arguments it gives in order to block the supply of food. tell me, please, mr. leonid , russia itself has been blocking grain the e-e corridor does not allow for inspections and , accordingly, essentially terminates the operation of the grain agreement, where e-e is currently accumulating , all this grain is possible without the names of specific locations , but in general, in which objects is there a place for storage and is there a ready place for a new one the harvest that we are waiting for in the coming months is quite serious, there is no place to put a new crop, which we will already collect somewhere in about 5-6 weeks, this is a problem and the first thing we will do

is to keep it in open areas again although they gave us help, they gave us so-called polyethylene bags, in which we tried to store thousands of tons of grain , it lost its quality and gained excessive moisture and became unfit for sale or to do something else. that is, we have to think about what to do if we start harvesting a new crop. said that the problem now is that we do not yet know whether we will be able to sow what we should , but half of the work has already been done , we will have enough funds for another 20 percent if we do not sell what we have. therefore, it is all very large problems and russia creates them first for us well, of course, what we talked about the european union is also a problem that we did not expect, but actually i personally and many experts knew that and this will be a problem for us. i am sure that the war

will end, we will win it, but further in order to become a member of the european union, there will be a lot of such, let's say, problematic questions, this is how to integrate our agriculture, which is an order of magnitude stronger than agriculture , which is supported only by subsidies to the european union 45 leonida would like to ask you about are there any specific practical scenarios that should be developed now from the side of our government ? the grain corridor demonstrates that russia will regularly try to screw up this faucet well, first of all, the european union can help us the most in this case. and

we need to develop logistics corridors in direction of the european union, at the same time, do not scare them, but say that we will transit the grain through your territory, your correspondent correctly said in my speech that spain, italy, other countries are the southwestern part of the european union , they need a large amount, even transit is not needed, but to give them these raw materials, but then polish, romanian, and slovak bulgarian farmers lose their opportunities to raise the price of this product, and they don't want it, so at this stage it is necessary, after all, there are many of us now we will do it, but we will multiply what has been done at the diplomatic level, at the level between not only state structures, at the level of relations between public associations, we are doing it now

with a penny, we are communicating with other associations to let us through the european corridors outside the european union, for this to give to us all the logistical capacities available in them without fear that we will leave it on the territory of the european union so that we can move it further to other countries , first of all to africa, at the same time the african the continent needs a huge amount of products, in addition to logistics, there is also the question of their ability to pay for it, so the fao is also needed here - it is a structure that is subordinate to the un, their ideal is for logistics hubs, that is, for strengthening our transport capabilities. i know joint programs , whether with the organization of nations or yes, i don't know with the european union or individual countries well , because if it falls on our state budget, it

simply won't last, won't last well, what about the need we understand this, the budget cannot do it because if we build, let's say, grain terminals on the territory of poland, there in other countries of the north of the northern part of the european union, then they should do it themselves, but they are afraid to invest money there because they say the war will end for you too it will not be profitable to use these terminals. and you will still move through the black sea logistics facilities, so we will not invest there now, uh, look for other opportunities, we tell them, ok, then no export your products outside the european union, and only we will sort ours, well, this is also an issue that needs to be discussed in more detail and, after all, finding

an understanding. and in fact, i have other proposals, well, this is a separate topic that we can talk about: increasing processing, which we do not have at the moment i think it is very important that in the future there should be processing, not raw materials, we sell, then let us lead, we can choose their facilities for rent and process and further export. and let them control that it does not remain on the territory for now european union because there is such an ethical moment here, how can we not just promise because the same poles don't really trust ukrainians anymore ? and if it comes to the transit of grain , at least polish farmers don't trust and want to check, install tracks, our cars, how can we guarantee to confirm and provide in the end so that these products really went in transit to those countries where they are waiting for them and did not settle somewhere with some fraudulent schemes, as was the case in neighboring

poland, and did not create a lot of problems for us and spoil our reputation among the closest neighbors and the poles introduced a system of transit control through their territory that was used by hungary. this is the sealing of vehicles. they put seals at the entrance and then at the exit beyond the boundaries of their borders. they check that these seals are not broken and that the products are in these trucks . they control the time of entry into the territory of poland and during the day , depending on which logistics vehicles they are, whether they are wagons or cars, cars during the day, wagons must leave the territory within 10 days

that is why it is necessary to do it carefully and it has demonstrated its effectiveness, that is why there are no fears and arguments that we cannot control because there are some incomprehensible companies, they said, and hmm, well , they were engaged in violating the order of trade and, well , let's say they hid these products, it all depends they worked out this mechanism from the poles, and it exists and it is effective. that is why it should be used, mr. leonid. and i do not yet know the directions of agricultural production, we should emphasize, so we understand that well the story with grain plus or minus is understandable, but we still have honey, we still have beans, we still have corn, and the list goes on and on.

protocol and poland, these five countries were banned by the european union there , two products were withdrawn from there, but in general, he also called er. union and poles neither hungarians nor slovaks neither bulgarians nor romanians stop the import of russian products, the only thing that hinders russia here is that they do not have access to the swift system, and they cannot receive funds for these products that they supply to europe, but they can barter. and actually why do they do it and i will not say that this is some kind of very big violation, because there are relevant international regulatory documents that forbid imposing sanctions on food and medical supplies, so russia is using this while violating these international

norms against ukraine are introducing it. you see, but actually what would i say anyway, if there was not , there is one thing that we must take into account that these countries are doing this after all. the main thing is that they are doing it for ukraine, they are providing help in fighting the enemy. this is military support political support, etc., therefore, the temporary problems that have arisen, they will of course move a little to another plane, will exist when we join the european union, i said that we will have to reform their agriculture and not the other way around another question, but at the moment we need to seek understanding from russia and reform, but i hope that somehow it will be possible to fix this transit . thank you, mr. leonid, for the answers.

which is about to start working already in mobile applications, it is actually working in connection with us olena kupina, lawyer , geo-institute of legislative ideas good afternoon , ms. olena, please tell me when it will start the background for the liquidation of the consequences of the war to act. good day, and the fund for the liquidation of the consequences of armed aggression has already begun to operate. but if we are talking about the restoration, accordingly, it is possible for citizens to receive compensation for e-e for damaged housing, unspecified housing for damaged housing that can be repaired, then today this platform and through the action, citizens can apply for such compensation today is the first day that it is valid , applications are submitted only through the action, are there any other options, currently the option works only through

action, but later the ministry will finalize the mechanisms and the possibility to submit applications through notary posts will be added. it is possible for the authorities to do so, but for now only through action. a person takes action in a few clicks, the first step is to submit a report that your property has been damaged, if you have done it before in the previous year of a full-scale invasion, you do not need to duplicate, the first step is to submit such a report, then you you need to contact the bank and open a special account, since the money will be credited to you not to your regular card, but to a special account , you can open it in banks with which the ministry has concluded an agreement. currently, this is privatbank monobank pumb, the meaning and the list of banks will be expanded that is, you can choose the one you like. you open this

special account, get it, your i-bank number, and then we can already submit an application for compensation for compensation for damages, all applications you just indicate your account. but i think that this is in effect everything will be adjusted quite automatically, and according to the moment you submitted an application within 30 days, the commission has it for this , the commission will come to inspect your apartment and what is very important now is to claim compensation for what i am restoring in the condition that it is now able to only those who have not yet repaired their lives, i.e. if, for example, you had a window in the last window, but you repaired it at your own expense and installed new ones , you cannot now claim to receive damage, this mechanism is now only for those who has not yet repaired uh, the ministry announces that they are working on uh , through some mechanisms of the operation, it may be possible to compensate those who have not yet repaired, but for now only if you have not

repaired the damage after the commission will pass an inspection will take a photo of what your e-e has happened, the documents have been reviewed and you will receive a message as a result of the action. is your e-e application satisfied or not? the specifics are in the front-line zone well, accordingly, but people still live there and we understand that they regularly fly there , it is also possible that there are some additional tools, well , we understand that in 200,000 uah, with all due respect , people cannot always afford it when it is necessary to do something more global, to live somewhere it is necessary from this , e.e., the law on compensation for damage to destroyed housing distinguishes two different categories, however, the category is damaged , which can be repaired and lived in, and the other is destroyed

because it is destroyed, it will not be repaired, there will be another procedure, it is now approved, people will to receive a certificate and for it to be able to purchase another home, now we are talking only about damage to the home and as the ministry announces it is aimed at smaller repairs, that is, not at, well, not at any global uh, when there is no complete i don’t know the roof and i don’t know not old from the door , there is nothing at all and this is not directed directed , well, according to the dimensions of this configuration, we understand what level of damage is there. therefore, now the mechanism is only for this, only for this level of damage, why are you talking about specifics the procedure is the same for everyone. the territory is independently fronted. is this housing damaged in some other regions ? the procedure is the same. the only thing we can expect . of course, if these are occupied territories, the commission will not have the opportunity to inspect the housing

, so it is there now. well, there. there simply cannot be these compensations now. and those that are controlled by ukraine, everyone has the same milan procedure. what other projects does the fund for the liquidation of the consequences of war have ? uah 52 billion is planned to be directed there this year, 17 of them have already been announced by the ministry, which will go to compensation for reconstruction and will be directed to other areas . there is repair and restoration of almost all real estate, schools , kindergartens, hospitals, and the restoration of military facilities, critical infrastructure facilities, and simply infrastructure. there is also

a direction for the purchase of school buses. or special transport, medical, there is quite a wide list, and this fund will work. as of now, no money has been allocated from the fund, only recently , in the last couple of weeks, a commission was approved that will distribute the funds. so, we expect that this fund will work in the near future. in priority in the fund, that is, which categories of the population, which needs will be covered in the first place well, they have already announced what so, for example, housing needs are in priority and that is exactly why, as you can see , the ministry has already launched its recovery of his e-e informational materials indicated that this is a recovery of up to 17 billion of those funds that e-e already have in the by the way, here it is interesting

to explain whether the 17 billion are funds that were compensated from zberbank and about the teddy bear everything that will be in this year also to be confiscated from the owners of the russian federation or its or no one, what do they do, these funds will also be directed to this fund for housing, there is also 250 million from the world bank, which is allocated in order to announce this housing, so housing is one of the priorities for what kind of money do you have? do you have these 52 billion e. what can they be enough for according to your assumptions and calculations, god, it is very difficult for me to answer this question because we are engaged in legal e-e. let 's put it this way, the expertise depends on the e-e, which e-e, for which objects the fund will direct this money, it will be large infrastructural objects, maybe some or it will be, for example , more concentrated, by the way, what is interesting - why

is it difficult to answer this question now, because now there is no approved methodology for deciding which applications to finance and where direct the money the ministry within six months and already within five months must approve such a methodology as soon as it is approved we can clearly say who is the priority, most likely there will be criteria well, uh, for example, how necessary i am, a critically important object, for example if this is the only hospital that is in a populated place , then it is probably a critically important object , the number of people that will be covered by the project, etc. important methodology for many people, we were contacted by a representative of the foundation of the institute of legislative ideas, for which we thank you, thank you, mrs. olena, and oksana vysochanska and i now

have to say goodbye. verdict let's watch together and see you soon on the air, of course this is the verdict program my name is serhiy rudenko everyone have a good day and good health today may 10, 441 days of heroic resistance of the ukrainian people to the russian to the occupiers over the past day, the armed forces of ukraine shot down six enemy drones in the sky over ukraine. three of them were of the chess type , the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine reports. armed forces of ukraine at