[000:00:00;00] from the defense package, danilov said that ukraine is now trying to bring ukraine to the negotiating table on russia's terms, meanwhile, the russian occupiers continue to lose manpower and equipment in ukraine, as of the morning of may 11, russia has already lost 196,920 orks in ukraine in the last day alone, the armed forces of ukraine destroyed 610 people at the beginning of the great war, the russians have already lost in ukraine 3,740 tanks, 7,287 armored combat vehicles , 3,053 artillery systems, 557 rocket launcher systems, 310 anti-aircraft weapons of defense 38 aircraft 294 helicopters 5984 units of automotive equipment 18 ships boats 970 cruise missiles

in 2627 drones 391 units of special equipment believes in the victory of ukraine in 2024 trump will flirt with putin the russians are scratching their heads about this and other things today we are talking about during the next e hours, i want to introduce today's first guest, this is volodymyr tsibulko, a political expert , volodymyr. good day. good health to you . thank you for joining our broadcast. congratulations , we believe in our victory without a doubt, mr. volodymyr, let's start our conversation with the latest extreme statements of volodymyr zelenskyi to european journalists, in particular, the president of ukraine stated that he believes in the victory of ukraine before the presidential elections in the united states of america, which are to be held on november 5, 2024, and when the president was asked if he was afraid that international aid, and in particular the aid

of the united states of america, can be almost military, he said that he still hopes that by november 5 in the 24th year, ukraine will win over russia and in general. he said that ukraine is betting on a two-party system on two parties that are currently competing with each other in the united states of america . what do you think about the expectations of president zelensky and about november 2024 as the point by which ukraine must achieve victory over russia, well, first of all, about the important thing in this statement. i consider stavka to be a bipartisan support for ukraine, because zelenskyi has a certain experience of being burned, so to speak

on the domestic american policy uh therefore first of all, ukraine is a factor in the internal politics of the united states and the topic of the ukrainian elections will be decisive in the attitude of this or that candidate and the voters to that or that candidate in order for the ukrainian victory to become, let's say, the most convincing argument for the users of another candidate , especially from the current government a certain temporary varnish is needed for about six months to prove the success of the actions to each voter, therefore, it is really necessary to win in advance, will ukraine lose the support of the united states if the hostilities drag on, will it not lose it permanently it is clear now, because now we are part of a much more global scenario

, as we remember, yesterday in japan they announced the beginning of the formation , more precisely, the beginning of the procedure for opening an office at the ato in japan. therefore , the security architecture of the world and the events on the fronts in ukraine are now beginning to change. they are speeding up this process. the united states is really paying attention to ukraine and the ukrainian factor. fables about the fact that he has allowed hostilities. well, to his credit, it is true that the first javelins were transferred to ukraine precisely because of trump, but

the ban on their use on the demarcation line is therefore hypothetical assumptions , so to speak, instead, a year has passed when the democratic majority formed a pain on lend-lease law on lend-lease and it was on may 9 that the first anniversary of the signing of this law by gas biden took place. in essence, this law, er, joseph biden not only guaranteed the supply of weapons under any circumstances, if not through the grant system, well, it’s because of loans, but ukraine would have weapons under any circumstances, even if the configuration of the congress changes completely, and republicans will dominate both houses, so ukraine is protected under this law, it is covered, so to speak,

in relation to supply of weapons, but here it is important now that ukraine preserves all democratic institutions and democratic procedures within itself, because when we see attacks on business and freedom of speech, restrictions on the movement of deputies from the opposition faction the participation of deputies in international france, it looks a little barbaric. that is, it does not correspond to the nature of the statement of the top leadership of ukraine about the rapprochement of the eu sign when internal politics in ukraine are used completely by the russian management methodology, this is important, mr. volodymyr, you have already mentioned the likely competitor of joseph biden in the elections on 24 in the year of donald trump, he was at a debate in the cnn tv studio and he was asked if he considered vladimir putin a war

criminal, trump said that he would not to answer this question, because they say that we may have to negotiate with the russian federation, and trump is holding an equal sign with the russian federation and with putin, and he says that if we say that he is a war criminal, there will be many of you to make an agreement to settle this matter. he means to end the war, trump says that it was really putin's mistake to go to ukraine and he would never have invaded ukraine if i were the president, said trump , rejecting trump's bold statement altogether well, it is clear that trump is now trying to play such a leader of the world and who was underestimated, but who can come and change something in

world politics, or according to you, there was a chance that putin would not start a big war against ukraine, because judging by the events that took place during for 20 years in russian-ukrainian relations, it seemed that he was preparing for a big war all these 20 years, and this big war is the culmination of his political career. will depend in general his future well, first of all, putin was really preparing for this war and he was elected by the elite and nominated by the elite as a technical figure who will really return all the

territories that left from russia, this was visible and we watched how russia was rearming, but these rearmament programs were hyperambitious and the western world, by the way, well, in the system of modernization of the russian army, the following companies were involved in the system of modernization of the russian army, for example, german companies consulted on the reformatting of the russian of the first army who was supposed to be the main opponent of such an army, this is the question, but when uh, trump talks about what, uh, it hinders negotiations with putin, well, the recognition of putin as a war criminal, then trump is actually cunning, because in the conditions of normal political leaders, negotiations from putin to putin, they foresee the preservation of putinism as such, this simply means postponing the war

for the future, that is, he is playing in the interests of putin in these statements, while, in my opinion , the majority of democratic leaders have matured to that putinism must be dismantled, that is, a ukrainian victory is not only a starting point at the border of 1991, this is a given, the colorization of russia, this is the dismantling of this fascist regime, this is , in the end, the decentralization of russia, preferably with the granting of independence to those er national er state entities that viable because there are , unfortunately, small nations that have autonomous status within russia, but they are unable to build a viable state in such parameters. therefore, we need to think about other recipes, but in fact trump is such

statements, we recall trump in helsinki, when he, like a rabbit, guessed at putin, simply wrung out, demoralized and essentially destroyed by victories with putin, and it seems to me that trump continues to play in the interests of putin , because what he is saying now about hypothetical direct negotiations with putin means that he for the preservation of putinism and who would be happy with it? who among the world leaders is now ready for the continuation, well, for the further existence of russia in its current form, this is the same continuation of the global catastrophe as i said in the interview mentioned volodymyr zelenskyi to european journalists, he said that we need to wait with the counteroffensive so as not to lose people, because for the past three or four months we have been hearing about

the counteroffensive and there is great hope for this counteroffensive, zelenskyi said that it is unlikely that we will succeed during this offensive , to go to the borders that were as of august 24 , 1991, in a word, let's hear zelensky , with what we already have, we can go forward and i think we will succeed, but we will lose a lot people, i think this is unacceptable. that's why we need to wait, we still need a little more time, but against the background of what is happening with the counteroffensive , that is , the start of the offensive is delayed. at the same time, oleksiy danilov of the national security and defense council says

that they are trying to bring ukraine to the negotiating table on russia's terms, and this thesis also echoes in parallel with ukraine's preparations before the counteroffensive, can it happen that the leaders of the countries who influence and can recommend volodymyr zelensky there to postpone the counteroffensive should still try to agree on something with the russian federation or, as danilov says, sit down at the negotiating table on russia's terms, well ... first, sit down at the negotiating table on russia's terms, this is again the same as what i was talking about, this is the preservation of putinism, this does not suit anyone, this is the first, second, and if there are no defeats on the front on the part of russia, there must be defeats

, and of such a catastrophic nature in economy or some huge infrastructural cataclysms that put russia in a notoriously weak position, so far it is believed that the only vulnerable place for russia is the front where you can quickly create a scenario, it is not only about the exit of the border of 1991, but for example the scenario of the liberation of a part crimea and this and putin's mythology that will create internal tensions in russia and make russia weaker , more plasticine, one can say in the process of overturning, but here there is another and another

situation when it is said about direct negotiations with russia. well, this form is filled with an informational pause, because in principle it is not about victory over russia . it is about a completely different configuration, for example, of the basic un. because now, in the middle of may 18-19, a large, very ambitious conference will be held in china for the average of the five central asian regimes and xi, and this is essentially the absorption of these regimes by china. well, it will preserve the norms, so to speak, -e ethics of a certain but china is building a huge one infrastructure in the amount of 50 billion e.e. dollars from china to these countries

, in fact, e.e., the possibility of moving goods in the city is all instantaneous, well, very fast is ensured by this infrastructure project, this means that china , fearing losses at sea, is forming e.e. continental routes for communication for the transfer of goods of people from the armed forces and the like eh and eh now, in fact, the european union is becoming the main market, so here it is just eh for putin there is eh on the one hand well, it seems like a field for maneuver, but then he himself is afraid to dissolve in china and on the other hand china is coming under russia itself. that is, it can be said that under the current circumstances, only bilateral, well, only the war between ukraine and russia is an element of the more contextual

efforts of many countries, but i mentioned the opening of the nato office in japan later in august, this is such an association australia and great britain of the united states to put pressure on china in the pacific theater of war, that is, a lot of processes are happening at the same time and we must always adjust our ukrainian ego with these events. by the way, there was information that a special agent visited ukraine the envoy of the president of brazil for international affairs , the former minister of foreign affairs , selsu amorim, met with president zelenskyi. this is reported by the voice of america in the ukrainian press. i did not come across this information, official information . for ukraine to cede the crimean peninsula to russia in order to end the war and

we know that brazil is a member of the brics association, where the meeting of this association or the summit will be held in south africa to the republic in august of the 23rd year, i don't know if they talked about this peace plan with zelensky, do you mean the brazilian side or not? obviously, these are already signals that are coming there that do not indicate that russia is obviously through brazil through china, through other countries, is trying to come to some peace plan with the ukrainians on the ukrainian side and with kyiv on your side, is it possible , and well, it is clear that not by way of er-e accession or er transfer of the final legal er-e from ukraine to crimea there russia but what

may be the subject of this hypothetical peace agreement, well, first of all, there was a soul of hatred for america, he did not play, although after his visit to portugal, his rhetoric changed somewhat, that is, he already has ukrainian crimea , but if he wants to trade something, then let him declare the independent republic of ukraine there are many ukrainians living in the territory of paranada, and then we can continue the conversation about the trade in ukrainian land if the special envoy really visited within the framework of the brics brazil is an important country and because there they the brics of south africa themselves are few and far between. it is a very strange situation because putin is afraid to go there even under any circumstances, that is , it will take place in such a slightly

truncated format, but the issue of such parasitism on the ukrainian topic for uu de se it is not new, he is a populist, he will run everywhere, what brings him any popularity or weight , unfortunately, brazil still does not offer any constructive ideas for ukraine, although, as far as i know , brazil, in my opinion, produces ammunition for cheetahs for those uh anti-aircraft complexes cannons that are on the german side that are now in service in ukraine, then he could put his stocks of shells in this complex and then parasitize on the ukrainian topic. by the way , the former secretary of state of the united states of america , henry kissinger, also talks about the possibility of peace talks. he talks about the fact that, one

way or another, the negotiations can be tricky, and he even said that he is ready to act on the american side in the negotiations with russia, we know that kissinger was once an adviser to volodymyr putin and, in principle, negotiations with someone who gave you a job or paid money, these negotiations can be quite specific , especially when it comes to the interests of russia and the interests of ukraine. why is kissinger pushing this topic? the answer is obvious. but maybe he still has other plans, including regarding the candidates for the presidency of the united states of america. we know that ukraine is an obvious topic of ukraine, which will be one

of the topics for future races. in the dialogue, they mentioned the topic of ukraine in the american elections, er, enriching, er, on may 27, er, he will turn 100 years old and obviously he does not have enough money for the jubilee events , because he would have worked as a waiter in the kremlin during the service, he could learn the phrase quickly деньги нужны actually well, some engineer is pushing the price of pro-russian arguments, but now they sound absolutely. well, it makes more sense, because he still talks about the important role of china in mediation , but for now, in kissinger's model, china can be a mediator for ukraine. that is, this mediation involves direct, er, side-face talks between putin and putin, but why

in ukraine direct talks with putin, they are not needed in ukraine, ukraine needs the necessary talks within the framework of a large international conference where china will be putin's lawyer and will sit poland ukraine poland great britain the usa, israel, germany, france as lawyers of ukraine and so, then uh, according to the consequences of these negotiations, if we do not reach a large security format and guarantees of uh security for ukraine, then there is no point in there is nothing else to these negotiations - it's just a truce, not a peace agreement, a peace agreement should provide at least a hundred-year security guarantee. and what does this mean, does it mean the decentralization of russia - it's a demilitarized

zone on the border with ukraine kilometers to the militarization of the black sea, further ecological damage ukraine suffered several hundreds of billions of environmental damages and they must be included as well as the subject of reparations, well, this is absolutely clear, and well, it seems to be the answers to the questions that we ask in our program they are obvious, although it is clear that it is probably very important to watch how the brics themselves will take place, because this is also a challenge for the same vladimir putin because, on the one hand, the south african republic has ratified the rome statute and in the event of putin's appearance

at this summit, it will be necessary to issue a tribunal at the international criminal court, and on the other hand, putin, well, you have to show that he has something there, some principles of this boy, he will really be offended by the decision and the warrant of the international criminal court. what do you think, eh? will it reach that at some stage putin will still reach this point when this warrant will be uh let's say so made public and uh he will be extradited some party will still extradite vladimir putin uh to the international criminal court because, well, the statute of limitations there are no crimes and no one will cancel this warrant except for the judges of the international criminal court, well, first of all, this is the first order of the order in the first case. and there is another case - it is the destruction of

civil infrastructure. to my lu- and more lukashenko is also involved in the case of child abduction, and in this case it is interesting that alongside such a decline in lukashenko's health, what kind of lukashenka regime is now very actively pumping out a reliable e-cream ? with the method of avoiding participation in the er, those bri x, although there is a circle to delegate to this one themselves. so this is a small problem, whether putin will personally participate in it or not. but most likely, now the topic is really hanging up putin's health as one of the most important arguments, we see this scandal between er prigozhyn and er ministry

of defense, those attacks are essentially aimed at putin, this is well er struggle of er bulldogs under the kremlin carpet it just splashed on the surface and in the russian consciousness, this is the destruction of unity, which has signs of an internal disaster, that is why, in fact , why is the bet not only on the frontline victories of ukraine , but also on the internal state of the administration of the economy, ecology, because there the territories of entire regions are burning up and the russian regime is doing nothing is done not done in this regard, therefore, there are many factors of such a general weakening of russia, and it works for us, but china also wants to revive itself at the expense of the weakening

of russia, that is, here, most likely , the question arises when the putin regime itself will be ready press the stop button to stop and go to negotiations not on your own terms, but on any terms, because otherwise it will be a disaster , otherwise death, so to speak, the state, thank you, mr. volodymyr, for the conversation. this was volodymyr tsibulko, a political expert, friends. we work live on the espresso tv channel as well as on our social platforms on social networks , in particular on facebook, also on the youtube platform for those who are currently watching us on youtube and facebook , please like this video and subscribe to our pages well, you can join our sponsor club you can now see a qr code by clicking on which you can get detailed instructions on how to become a member

of the espresso channel youtube sponsor club, we will be grateful for any help, in addition, remember that we have a wonderful website espresso tv , by clicking on which you can get round-the-clock information about what is happening in ukraine and the world, we work for you 24 hours a day, seven days a week, there is no more prompt information from ukraine and the world. the frontline chronicle is on our website espresso tv well, then we are in touch with yaroslav lysenko, a fighter of the third battalion of operational assignment svoboda , a member of the rapid response brigade of the national guard of ukraine, border crossing yaroslav , good day, good health to you and thank you joined our broadcast good day glory to ukraine glory to the heroes let's start with the situation on the eastern front because a