[000:00:00;00] military experts probably for the first time began to say that, apparently, as of now, the air defense of ukraine is already stronger than the israeli iron dome , a dagger was shot down, and there were a lot of rumors circulating on social networks about where the russians were really aiming on the eve of their victory day, is it possible to tell this information now if it did they really try to attack the so-called decision-making centers, houses, where , how can you characterize the actions of the anti-aircraft forces, which are currently surprising the whole world, i think , including the americans, this is very important one

it's one thing when you deal with this issue theoretically, it's another thing when you practically protect your country, you protect your land with the direct use of means of destruction , that is almost daily. more professional in more carefully choose the means of defeating certain objects that appear on the territory of our ukraine and you have already drawn attention to the fact that the percentage that today is very many in the world, let's say, are in a certain situation of great satisfaction that the weapons that are supplied to us, including those of western production, are capable of knocking down almost all types of weapons that are available in russia, moreover , after the situation with the dagger in russia, there was a little bit of another lie that we are today thanks to the work of our president, because it was after the meeting

with biden of volodymyr zelenskyi that we received petriv vody, and we have the ability to even knock down all the daggers today which until now, unfortunately, we did not have such an opportunity. therefore, i emphasize once again that we will accept stronger. we stand much stronger. therefore, the ability of the russians to defeat our country is getting closer to zero every day. and every day we are getting closer to our victory over the enemies traditionally we are now asking what will happen to boguslaev, because there was information that he wrote a letter to the head of the president's office, andriy yermak, and asks him to allow him to be somehow exchanged for someone in russia. he complains about what he calls himself

pensioner, disabled person of the first group, and so on, the journalist himself, who published it, yury butusov, says that such an exchange can be dangerous, because he is a criminal of theology, and we must punish him according to our laws, according to our laws do you know whether they can even exchange and consider exchanging oslaev for someone ? let's be frank if there is a need to return our military, our citizens of our country, and for this we will have to give up anyone, but we have to make such a decision because a person's life is of the highest value for us, that's what butusov wrote about the fact that water was transferred there, there are some secrets about the fact that, well, look, bohuslav has been working for more than the first day, and i can tell you that if he worked for a certain time, then what he could most likely, he already conveyed what is related to people who would have a desire to go there to russia in order to work there. well, this is a big question, because i am not sure that

boguslavov has such an influence that the things that i wrote about will happen well, it will simply be impossible. in my opinion, we will not release anyone from here because it is clear that these people work at a military enterprise and everything is much more complicated here than he himself can imagine. day are in the hands of these terrorists, so we have to do it because these are the lives of our citizens, not the people of god, that's another matter, how many? i want to remind you that when they changed one prominent contemporary putin's godfather. yes, we took away 200 days, as some are mistaken, and 250 of our military is only due to this exchange. if someone thinks that it should be left, well, it is possible and should be left. only i don't understand why , if we can save our citizens,

i emphasize to us once again this should be done. please tell me if the connection is the position. well, i draw your attention to the fact that when he blessed me, he wrote the whole letter , but even the russian federation was written there with a small letter. and that's a little strange for me . well, let it be so, at least i was please tell me, if you look at the situation in general, again, many military experts , including foreign ones, point out that, in fact, from the month of may and maybe somewhere after the ninth of may, when it finally became clear to everyone that the russians were in a bad place to advance further. well, hardly it will be successful globally the russian federation goes on the defensive yes, it defends everything on ukrainian territory, this is an important nuance, definitely not on its own but nevertheless, the logic of the war has changed. either

way, the logic of the war has changed under the influence of our armed forces under the influence of our tactical and strategic decisions and if earlier they had a great desire to seize kyiv , then they wanted to seize the territory of the kherson zaporizhia region encroached on the kharkiv region and other things we see today are the inability to even finally capture a small district center called bakhmut. that is why even today these tantrums are happening there. this is not true. this is an intraspecies struggle that started in russia. we expected it. so we predicted that it would start somewhere in march. well, a little late in a month, but it started and it will only increase. so, they also have a struggle when clarifying the relationship. how is it?

it happened that the second army of the world could not capture the district center, and at the same time they said that they were putting all of europe there, as they wanted to put it, well, our armed forces, our nation proved that there is no need to be afraid of anyone we have to do our job to protect our country and everything will be fine. this morning they really talked about what the russians had plans to attack kyiv again on kharkiv region and we. in the winter, when you joined our companies, we very often asked you how the situation was on the northern border of our state where is belarus located and in general this was one of the most irritating topics in the winter, will the belarusian army try to attack the borders of ukraine, is it important whether it is an attempt to attack, whether they will cross them, it seems to me that the question is clear

now, in general, there is this issue, so to speak, on the news of the day regarding the attack from belarus by both russian troops and the troops of the republic of belarus, we are monitoring the situation in this territory, but i can say that now the tension is much less than it was before, if previously there was a certain amount of the military of the russian federation and we very carefully followed this process so that their number did not increase precisely in order to carry out an attack on our country from that side, so to this day we are observing reduction of this number, they are there, yes, they are in belarus, but there are fewer of them at the landfills, they conduct a certain adjustment, then they are sent to the region of donetsk and luhansk regions. so , even today, we do not see such a big threat, but i emphasize once again that it is for today if there will be any movements, if there will be any processes, our intelligence will immediately monitor all this and will respond accordingly. in addition, i draw

attention to the situation related to the leadership of belarus, you see that the father is no longer the same the father who was there before was already there a little bit and got sick and something happened to him there and very quickly from the ninth of may he went to his home with muscovy, well, you can see for yourself in terms of appearance , before that the person looked much better oleksiy danilov secretary of the national council of security and defense and thank you for finding time for us, we have used up the time we planned and the time you planned for us . we are continuing the project, says the great lviv, and we hope that in the next broadcasts we will be able to hear important information from uh, well, important person in our country, now we are actually trying to be very careful in that we ask mr. oleksiy because we understand that well

, he cannot tell a lot of things live and say it in general. to look a-a with experts we , too, will probably not be right if we ask for some details, but we will try to talk with you more extensively about the situation that exists if we still go back to the beginning of our conversation, namely to those missiles that we received today from great britain, to what extent can they change the course of what is now and did we expect them, because a few weeks ago they said that this would not happen, they would not be given to us, they would not be handed over, and it is not entirely possible. you know, first of all, you need to understand that there is no wonder weapon that can turn the tide of war as the very essence of war as one of the elements of war and accordingly we are talking about the comprehensive use of all available forces and

means that are available to us today at the moment, were there any warnings about what would be transmitted to the shadow side , no, there was not, because it was necessary to understand the following train of thought . can strike the enemy in such a way as to destroy his communications destroy his logistics destroy his command structures or strike at these structures and accordingly when we talk about uh what weapons could we have well, first of all, people said that it is necessary to transfer to such and such and so on and so on. but there are small ones, but this is also small, but it is connected with a certain caution of the countries of the nuclear club regarding accusing them of transferring to ukraine technologies that can contribute to a nuclear strike on the territory of russia and such nuclear strikes can be carried out precisely by land-based e-e launchers

of the himax type if we are talking about the use of attack missiles, but we need these weapons and that is why an interim solution was found that allows us to carry out our tasks or begin to carry out their tasks and not create an additional precedent for accusing us and the world community of the possibility of using nuclear weapons , therefore the transfer of such missiles as storm shadow . the adversary there is the strengthening of nuclear rhetoric and they will perform tasks that are beneficial to the armed forces of ukraine, and what about what oleksiy danilov said, well, believe me for today our defense force. we are the whole that needs to be hit and for these missiles , believe me, even in the temporarily occupied territory there are a lot of targets. you can even remember

the same map of crimea that was published and on which it seems. by the way, you are the missiles that will be handed over to us. to be used only in crimea, of course we do not want our native crimea to suffer from that, but even the map that is visible shows how many targets can be hit right there. that way we get weapons and do not violate the agreements that were our allies and partners, in fact, the cooperative vitaliy portnikov, a political expert, told us on the air that crimea was used by russia to make it such a place for storing these weapons , all of you who are there, he is full of them, no matter how sad it is for us. i want to draw a parallel for myself, and would you tell me if it makes sense to you? it doesn't. you really mentioned squids, and the appearance of squids somewhere became a condition. one of the important reasons for the start

of the counteroffensive, and we remember how the antonov bridge in kherson was blown up. yes. and after that, in fact, the ukrainian armed forces returned and liberated kherson without a fight. in the end, before that, there was a successful kharkiv counteroffensive, and now, for the last two weeks , when, well, the whole of ukraine in the seven-day field was wondering, well, when, when, what kind of offensive will be it is possible to call a counter-offensive or , correctly, an offensive, uh, some people have noted that , in fact, the russians have already learned how to drag their formations out of reach, let's say , the martians, can it be uh, the provision of missiles a storm of missiles is such an important prerequisite for another successful offensive for ukraine, and in addition, you just need to understand that the length of our front line is one and a half thousand kilometers deep into the positions of the russians , well, let's say that there are 200, 300, and 500 missiles , they will not solve these tasks at once

i just haven't decided physically, we will be able to strike at a greater depth, we can destroy the enemy's positions and his command structure more, as i already said, but to say that these missiles will solve the issue of offensive operations as a single person or defeat in any way no, because all the same, the offensive operation will be decided on the battlefield by our mechanized tank units, our aviation and artillery for the most part, and the storm even up to, accordingly, even to those distances covered by the weapons operationally -strategic level . the dynamics of hostilities, but obtaining such a weapon is very useful because the enemy will have to adapt to new conditions

. and that will take time, and time is our weapons. i suggest adding another aviation expert to our conversation, in particular valery romanenko, who is not in touch with us. good evening glory to ukraine glory to the heroes good evening, we are talking about long-range british missiles uh, as far as i understand correctly, these are air-to-ground missiles, yes, that is , they will be attached to ukrainian aircraft and how effective it will be to use them and we very often talked about the same with you, including the fact that ukraine needs f16 planes, which we are not given yet, and which , in fact, according to many, could also change the course of the war, how important are these long-range british missiles and they can serve, including uh, and replace those f16s that we don’t have yet, a missile will never replace an irreplaceable aircraft, and we get

missiles, but the same missiles, if we had them in the 16th, and we would use them, this missile is it at all does not depend on the type of aircraft and which one it is they launch it is a very useful thing. well, you know, first of all, we have these missiles over the temporarily occupied territory, now if we receive them from stamshedl, we will be able to launch them not from the front line, we will be able to launch them 70-80 km from the front line, that is, our planes will no longer be in danger of being hit enemy anti-aircraft missile complexes, this is the first moment, the second moment, we will be able to carry out enemy warehouses with the help of these missile bases , disrupt enemy logistics, and if after receiving the hai and went to the enemy warehouses for

70 km, now they should at least double imagine this distance under the conditions of our supply, it means the shoulder of logistics, yes, it means when it is necessary. previously, it was enough to carry shells for 20 km for artillery . that ukrainian planes will really be able to attack russian positions without entering the air defense zone of the russian federation, does that mean that we will finally get this parity because, well, really, when in the first months of the war, from the territory of belarus, we they fired at it, it was like that, you know. well, there is a certain feeling of hopelessness, because they really did not reach the planes, of course, and now in the caspian, they are directing these missiles to the territory of ukraine. those calibers and daggers have a greater range of action, but none the less , that is, we are moving towards this c- an equalizing

situation precisely in such attack capabilities from the sky. is this position correct ? well, of course, each new model of long-range weapons expands our capabilities . even with a long range, if it really corresponds to 400 km, then this missile , for example, works perfectly on bridges. it has a tandem warhead, that is, the lead charge pierces a hole, which means that the main charge flies into it and the target is already inside it. well, if it is a bunker or there is a bridge support, it means it ah, it explodes already there. you understand the level of damage, so to speak, the leading charge is about 50 kg, yes, and the main charge is somewhere around 4. well, there is about 300 kg, because there are still lethal

elements in this warhead. well, that means we will be able to significantly worsen the enemy's logistics having received such a long-range weapon. well, in the conditions of the offensive, this is a very important moment. well, you can see here, on this diagram , which is now on the screen, the oil has gone, the scheme. well , about the penetration, actually, how much penetration, yes. you can see the pattern of the penetration, a hole is made by this hole into this hole, then the main charge flies out. well, that means the rocket works interestingly. so it is effective. of course, it significantly increases our capabilities, but you yourself have just shown that we cannot use such rockets to attack the russian territory, that is, this missile will become only one of the striking elements of our such a long arm, yes, but still, we need

our own ukrainian martyrs in order to reach russian airfields during the offensive, because the russian aviation suffered insignificant losses for them and it can hinder we need to neutralize our offensive, if we had ukrainian martyrs, we could, well, with a range of at least 300 km, then the russians would have to throw their aircraft back, you know, to voenihorsk, murmansk region, and for that so that we don't hit it, but the rockets give us such an opportunity because they are western-made, we don't have such an opportunity . thank you, mr. valery, for your expert opinion . we just wanted to clarify everything related to these missiles. if we go back to the reaction of russia, uh, to press secretary piskov, how did they react to this, and they have already reacted because in fact the information appeared on cnn, then the prime minister of britain

confirmed that they will still hand them over to us and this is what they say in russia. they treat me very negatively there. this will require an adequate response from our military , who will naturally make appropriate decisions from a military point of view. well , they have twisted something like this into their repertoire. vitaly, how can they? to answer this, what can they use besides the fact that they can intimidate with nuclear weapons , we have already heard that they also intimidated us with a missile defense system and talked about it in principle. which is actually related to the preparation for our offensive operations, when the enemy significantly increased the intensity of strikes on, let's say, front-line regions, we can see how many strikes it is published by our open sources are being carried out now in kharkiv oblast, zaporizhzhia oblast , kherson oblast, in fact, they can

use it in in connection with that, we see the strengthening of, you know, quite a lot of such, but how do they consider reliable types of weapons, such as barrage ammunition, which allow to apply strikes, bomb strikes from a fairly long distance and what a sin to hide with quite serious effectiveness, they do not stop trying to use the so-called modified s300 s400 missiles, which also allow us to inflict serious damage on our objects, which are very difficult to shoot down, that is, the enemy is already using certain forces and means, you can talk about a certain increased intensity of blows, but to talk about the fact that they have something in their pocket that is a surprise for us today is hardly appropriate, but you said about the saturation of strikes, and indeed we did so somewhere on the eve of may 9. well, in fact, we had

a certain activation of airstrikes in the end somewhere. it seems to me that everything was finalized after when the dagger was brought down, is it possible, uh, if you look at the logic of the war in general, hmm, in certain waves, the russians are shelling ukrainian cities and after an intense period, there comes a period when the intensity really decreases, or can we now talk about the fact that this is the period when the intensity will be reduced? there for a certain number of weeks, and you want forever know it is relatively relatively if we are talking about such cities as, for example, kyiv , in front of which there are 2 or other cities located in the central and western parts of ukraine, then we can understand that the enemy is forced to reduce the intensity because in order to strike these locations, he needs slightly different forces and means, we are talking about ballistic missiles, we are talking about cruise missiles or the same martyrs, but what concerns the front-line regions, which i have already talked about

, it is unlikely that we can expect a decrease the intensity of strikes there because it has enough resources to carry out strikes in these regions, as i already said, it was also about barrage munitions , it was about systems of salvo fire, uh , increased range, such as hurricane uh, and tornadoes, and it is about the use of modified missiles of the s300 s400 complex, which allow the enemy to strike at a distance of 150 km in the case of the s-300 and more than 200 km in the case of the s-400, so this intensity will not decrease in the near future, not in the 45th brigade , the secretary of the lviv city council, mr. markiane

we congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to the heroes and we know that you are in the eastern direction, but now , after all, for a long time attention has been attached to bahmut, including because there is a lot of talk about it, in particular, a lot is said by our enemies who say that there the armed forces of ukraine are advancing on these we have already heard the statements of prigozhin many times, but now they have also become more active , saying that the armed forces are pressing, they are already there, they are already leaving, but we cannot believe them. of course, we cannot, so we ask you what can be done to tell how the situation is there and to what extent the ukrainian army managed to dislodge the enemy. in fact, only the representatives of the general staff and the military component, who are authorized to comment on any information from the front, should really believe and pay attention. i would not pay attention to any comments, i direct them to other people which i don't know now, there are internal

confrontations, hysterics, five-tenths, but these moments they comment on, they can comment in the same way with even more double pitarism, including in order to introduce a novel, including us, because of that, there is absolutely no need to pay attention to these things , that is, it is necessary to pay attention to it from the point of view that it is possible that they have some problems, do they really have those problems, or is this some kind of staged situation, we will see from the time that accordingly, the situation under bahmut today has already received official comments, so we can talk about this and there is indeed progress in some directions in the area of ​​bahmut. we hope that this is only the beginning and in the near future we will see a better situation. battles both in bakhmut itself and in its vicinity and in fact throughout the entire section of the eastern front, because of this it is very important

to pay attention to what can be commented on, not what cannot be commented on. i understand that everyone wants only positive things . at such moments , it is extremely important, so i ask that all of ukraine should relate to this understanding. with such a rather powerful road of alarm , on may 9, the russians traditionally tried something there , and nothing was achieved in the military sense according to the testimony of many analysts, it became rather a council of shame, which demonstrated that the russian army really lost a lot of equipment and tanks during more than a year of full-scale war with ukraine, and they were unable to use their

famous aroma, which ani na the front essentially does not have any advice. there is no more. what conclusions did you draw for yourself from this advice from the point of view? well, i think, first of all, from the point of view of a military serviceman, is it really us and this parade showed that there is little equipment in russia, or maybe this is the case and oman they can us enter what did you talk about in the end, well, again, as regards the preparation for the parade of which zno of the deceased who were in the central part of the western part of ukraine, this concerns this part of ukraine which, let's say , should be secured a little at the expense of the means currently used by the russians. in general, all the propont cities and the whole the line of contact , they don't have any expectations, uh, positive or worse , due to the fact that shelling takes place constantly , every night, every day, in large quantities. that is, there, well, with varying intensity, but practically it can be said that it is not necessary to understand from the parade itself that this parade

is needed primarily by them for their own population and here they were in a certain fork when on the one hand it is necessary to show how powerful they are, that nothing has changed and that their traditional annual parade this will happen on the other hand, they could not and cannot use this technique, which is actually in full force on the territory of ukraine , including already including in the social network for photos, and development tanks are used of the 1950s, which shows that they are still starting to fight with this equipment , that is, not all of it is in good condition, a huge amount of it was ground up by our armed forces with other units that cut off the aggressor and they are actually forced to pull it out of their hansa in soot income, well , again, here you need a couple, the whole world is gone