[000:00:00;00] reduction even to humiliation inside, the fact that i am ukrainian is bad, and therefore i have to give up the fact that i have everything inside. and this is not a new practice. the ottoman empire, removing children of other nations , turned them into loyal to the sultan, a janissary in nazi germany was subordinate to a surgeon, jugent is mentioned a similar system of enumeration and in the ussr what is worth only the party said nada komsomol answered yes children were subjected to practical processing and militarization in afghanistan and pakistan but temporarily occupying ukraine russia applied the know-how of imposing a russian identity starting from kindergarten, and older children have been threatened with responsibility for dissent for 14 years if they, for example , spoke about the violation of the territorial integrity of the russian state and this is also

the same statement that crimea is ukrainian and we we see the first consequences of the same children who, er, were, well, so you can say , recruited and who, after becoming adults, immediately go to the russian army and start killing ukrainians there developing children in all spheres of life, socializing them in the russian way, muscovites tried their best to change their national identity from ukrainian to russian, feeding them with the tones of myth and turning against their homeland at a frantic pace from ukraine, they molded an ideological enemy, you destroyed our childhood , the blue country is absolutely not scary i want to bring as possible more than that , experts emphasize that not all children are necessarily brought up under the conditions of russian occupation , so it is suggested that the influence of the family is no less

significant than the influence of the educational environment or a different environment in which the child is. therefore, we have to counterbalance everything that surrounds the child, so to speak, each child then becomes an adult and she will be able to personally analyze the situation and make a choice at an adult, conscious age, a certain memory is demonstrated and proposed by anastasia bertynyova, who is currently speaking on the side of the occupiers, the lines of taras shevchenko , which, by the way, we learned in ukrainian at school by memory, but to bring back this generation of children , especially those who were born and grew up under the conditions of occupation, will not just have a different life they did not see and those whom the beginning of the war in 2014 jumped at a conscious age, insults will rise and she will come with such great aggression and will say why this is how it happened why did you shoot there why did you kill and she will tell everything that was suggested to her and it will be necessary to respond

to this, nowadays the russians exert an ideological influence on children even more powerfully, military training is already a mandatory subject for which myth-making conversations about the important and also aware of the influence of pro-ukrainian parents and are trying to select children from the new temporarily occupied territory of ukraine, village, power, anna brykova, we are ukraine, marathon, the only news, victory, you want the occupiers to leave our land, and you are indignant when the next forecasts are not fulfilled, it may end, but you should understand one thing, they will not stop. if you

do not stop them, let the armed forces be the first to meet the enemy the first to send the aggressor in the right direction, the first with honor, this is the slogan of the ukrainian border guards. today, our state border is not just a line on the mat, it is the border between light and darkness, and every day they fight to restore and protect it glory to the ukrainian border guards is unacceptable a unique art exhibition about feelings about values ​​and the daily struggle of each of us from the beginning of the full-scale invasion until the spring of 2023 our common experience that

is worth talking about you how come from june 1 to june 25 in a ukrainian house exhibition a conversation that is impossible without you continues joint information marathon, the only news, we work for you live, the channel team, we are ukraine, maria skyba and maksym sikora are now in the studio, then we will talk about cotton so a black day for russian aviation on the territory of the aggressor country near the border with ukraine, as many as four enemy air targets were shot down . what is this su-34 bomber? not confirmed, all mi-8 crew members were killed, two su-34 pilots and one pilot of the 135th all air targets were shot down over the bryansk region

by the russians themselves, but propagandists say that politicians and helicopters were targeted by ukrainian anti-aircraft guns of western long-range systems, there is still a version that this is the work of ukrainian saboteurs operating on the territory of the federation, well, black smoke over the occupied luhansk , there are explosions for the second day in a row, the rumblings started from the very morning, then the building of the former academy of the ministry of internal affairs in luhansk, which was used by the russian occupiers , was allegedly hit as a barracks for personnel, and in the evening , cotton again visited the occupied city, this time it is reported in social networks that an explosion rang out in the military headquarters where they were based russian military well, let me remind you that the day before the explosions rang out on the territory of the former machine-building plant and 100. it is assumed that the russian occupiers used it as a supply point and a repair base for military equipment. valentin glykhykh is in our studio, a political analyst

of the united ukraine center, let's talk about these and other events, valentina, greetings good night. good evening. and what of all the events confuses you the most , pleases, questions because you have the feeling that the russians themselves have not decided whether it is sabotage or some kind of mistake on their part or this our air defense or what happened there is not clear. so who decided here and what interests you here ? well, now, after the crash of these two helicopters , i was able to understand the meaning of mimish. there are many videos . i understood what mimish is. it was very mimish. i am quite satisfied, i think that the majority of our fellow citizens well, it is also nice that once upon a time our distant ancestors came from the so-called starodubshchyna, and now all the events are unfolding just in time for the starodubshchyna starodubshchyna.

in principle, these are our ethnic lands. and as they say, houses and walls help. that's why it is possible that the native land woke up and began to destroy these rashi invaders in the sky. well, if we're serious. yes, without all these ironies and sarcasm. well, look, there's a war going on. er, they kill military objects, well, machines that were supposed to fly to ukraine and strike at ukrainian positions, and i tend to think about civilian infrastructure as well. hit us who is behind all this? well, who is the author of this? well, i don't know. no, i'm not ready to say. i usually refer to this kid's speech in the verkhovna rada when he was appointed head of the top security service when he said that we cannot promise anything but death to the enemies, and i think that he is not the only one who can

promise the enemies only death, so did the russians themselves shoot it down, it is absolutely ideal to continue well, don't lose your pace, it's not bad for you, it's good to destroy each other , it's great better than fighting against us so don't stop destroying each other and the other. well, maybe it really worked, well, some of our air defense systems . well, although again, let me say that this happened already on the territory of russia, well, it is doubtful if it could have been some sabotage groups. well, it could have been well, sometimes people get the wrong impression about how it works , well, that is, some kind of agency networks are being built , by the way, budanov talked about this, remember when he said that well, we can, as it were, through their certain structures, implement our, well, plans on the thief's territory well, that's how it works and it's very good that ukraine is finally demonstrating its ability to destroy the russians

on their territory, because i say folk wisdom would have the enemy on his territory so that shit doesn't stink so much , and it's interesting that such a loud reaction with the side of our western partners is not there, and here you remember, do you remember two weeks ago in history with the minister of defense of germany, he gave an interview to a certain state official. he said that this is a normal process when, sooner or later, the side that defends itself. independence who is the victim and who is the attacker and you said who else will threaten there or something like that , president volodymyr zelenskyi did not say in an interview with the bbc two days ago that those people who are now sitting in the kremlin will end badly and then there was medvedev's tantrum and so on and so it will look like it's obvious that they're finishing badly, i think they're already having a bad time, but they haven't finished yet well, but in general, in principle, everything is fine. well , if nothing extraordinary happens while maintaining the existing trends, well, in principle

, i think that they can predict well and the balance of forces and well, what is waiting for them to continue, by the way. let's remember today's visit of mr. zelensky right away in italy, where he once again persuaded everyone to support his peace plan, which, in particular , he even voiced in rome yes, parisians, yes, in particular, but at least i would say that the prime minister of italy in this context, with all due respect to the pope , but still, the prime minister, in this context, is a much more important figure. and clearly stated that she supports er, well, myrnyi zelenskyi's plan, in particular, with the point about the need to bring and punish all the culprits, who are the bigger culprits , who are the bigger criminals than putin and his entourage, who unleashed this war, all the others who are the direct perpetrators, they will also be responsible, of course, for their actions

but it is unlikely that those who solved it all, the architects of this entire history, will be able to avoid punishment . well, yes, these are inevitable processes, or so he said, and what's more, the question is that the war actually came to russia a long time ago well, we can simply talk about how it got there, first it came due to economic difficulties, well, caused by sanctions pressure on the russian federation, then it came in the form of summonses for these people who were mobilized and completely disposed of later here in ukraine, later it came in the form of these people of black plastic bags with the remains of the partially mobilized, well , in the end, they partially returned there, uh, and then it continues now already in the form of various, i would say it, what is it called cotton, and the amount is increasing, and it must be understood that not all of it on

the territory of russia is the result of our actions , that is , in particular. various objects, political clans, well, anyone, but also the court , spontaneous processes. well, because when you start to lack resources in order to support the functioning of all these objects, there will inevitably be errors. then accidents, because entropy . i think not many people in russia understand this word, what it is. well, nevertheless, entropy in russia is increasing , this should also be realized, so if it was shot down by the russians due to their own air defense, their own planes were shot down, what could be more

what is happening with cotton in the temporarily occupied territory of the luhansk region of the donetsk region is not bad , let's not forget that there was a fire there and such cotton things continue to happen. give up crimea or collect things leave crimea or they will rather remain donetsk luhansk region or is this question ideologically irrelevant what do you think i am sure that at the moment the real goal of this war is the maximum extension of putin's regime and his clique in power . that is, no other they don't set goals for themselves. everything else - these are tools for achieving this goal. that is, i don't think that they are so weak in order to be delusional about territorial gains or in what they can uh twist out of this history there in some negotiations

and they there something some territories will allegedly become disputed and it will be possible to agree on something there no this will not happen ukraine from the war will end only when ukraine restores its territorial integrity all state sovereignty within internationally recognized borders when all the culprits will be punished when the appropriate compensations will be paid when all citizens of ukraine who were illegally deported will be returned territories of this russian state well, there are other points that zelenskyi spoke about again today, he keeps talking about them, by the way, they are contained in the ukrainian resolution that was voted by the un general assembly, which also adds weight to it at the international level, which shows that our demands, our positions are completely natural legal, legitimate and not only does not contradict the statute of the llc, but in fact it is an embodiment of the provisions contained in the un statute, simply

applying each of these to a specific situation , so i tend to think that it is unlikely that all this it is possible to achieve uh under the condition of having putin in the kremlin and keeping his regime in power, this is exactly what volodymyr zelenskyi made another statement to the italian media today in a briefing at a briefing, when the ukrainian military reaches crimea, the russian dictator volodymyr putin will have to find a way out to live in peace, volodymyr zelenskyi said in an interview with representatives of the italian mass media, he emphasized this point. it will come very soon, direct speech, we will have counter-offensive actions and we will push back. it will definitely happen his support in society will decrease, he will have internal issues, and he will solve them, he will find certain steps, i am sure of this, our motivation will only increase, and believe me, when we are at the administrative

borders of crimea, his support will be internally supported his inner circle is reduced - business will put pressure on him. find a way out and they will have to find it for a short time . voiced by zelenskyi, and i think that zelenskyi was probably not very good with his words. he probably wanted to say , sleep with garbage, that is, putin should rest in peace, yes, or they will rest . we are talking about pacification. we simply have to express the law, but if

we are serious, then there is a decision of the security and defense council of ukraine, which was put into effect by the relevant decree of the president of ukraine on the inadmissibility and impossibility of any peace negotiations with the putin regime. accordingly you and i all understand that whatever it is, it still ends with some kind of agreements , accordingly, there must be subjects who will sign these agreements, we said right away that putin 's regime cannot be the same why he cannot be such subjects, the answer is also simple obvious because they cannot be trusted well, because it turns out that surkov, who talked there for many years about the fact that ukraine does not want to fulfill the minsk agreements , produced all this delusion, and then it comes out of the difference, you know and we did not intend to fulfill the minsk agreements and that was it's just a trap that ukraine has fallen into. well, that's it. where is the guarantee that there won't be another trap that will be set there already at

a different stage, so i'll repeat that there's another key point, as i already said above, that's one of the key conditions for the settlement of this conflict. the end of the war is bringing the perpetrators to justice, that is, if putin signs some kind of agreement where he agrees to put on handcuffs and go to the tribune in the tribune for the tribunal session, well then ok , by the way, he can be safe there because in principle, the same humanity of society there is no death penalty. but his entourage may well feed him a pie with dust, and a person who during his life had a klitschko mole, well, quite naturally, can end his life path with naphthalene or something with dust, that's why they are being poisoned , maybe zelensky meant that for the putin regime and for putin personally, this is finding a peaceful life for himself, this means being behind bars. this is

the only place where he is guaranteed safety, but i will repeat before that we have to go, well, it is a long, long, long way. do you think it can change history in general, and the situation that in fact russia is now, or putin will say so , we have nothing to end the war, we did not announce a so-called special operation in our country , that is these are the legal aspects, they can protect russia in some way. well, because we have a war, it is a war, and it is the whole world. you know that it is civil, they have their own rules , concepts, whether it does not matter anymore, no, this is my secondary importance. well, this is legal casuistry, uh, also to influence something, but it is of secondary secondary importance, therefore, today, only the results

of hostilities are important. well, you must realize this and be honest with yourself about this. depend on something, then the next question and what depends on the results of hostilities , well, as a result of hostilities, they depend on the ability of the parties to achieve the set goals, what are the goals set on the field , again, weapons were soldiers, and this is ensured the financial stability of the economic stability within the societies that are waging war, so it is clear that the results of the battle are largely based on the fact that the sanctions pressure on russia was intensified , so that russia did not have the opportunity to strengthen its military capabilities. well , so that they did not have anyone to fight and there was nothing to fight for, look, and on the other hand , ukraine must be strengthened accordingly so that the ukrainian armed forces can inflict a military military defeat on the russians. for

this, it is necessary to ensure macroeconomic stability in ukraine, economic support should be provided to ukraine with military and technical assistance as much as possible so that ukraine has all the necessary tools to destroy the occupiers of these criminal hares and then well, actually, everything else will be derived from this and in this context, and also would i wanted to draw attention to one more important point, because when we talked about these points, one of the points is already very important - it's security guarantees, and here again, i want to draw your attention to this here is the article in spiegel, again, which was published by ramosen and yarmak, the authors are precisely about the fact that ukraine must inevitably receive security guarantees and another alternative besides the acquisition of the first great war, no, we asked for this a long time ago and we know how it all looked, but here

what is the change actually speaking of the situation, first of all, mosin and yarmak, that is, i tend to think that this article is not so much a way to influence the position of western leaders and, well, not only western, but states . for some reason, i tend to think that this article is precisely became the result and evidence of the existence of a certain consensus already among these states regarding the future of ukraine in nato, and i am very optimistic about this vilnius summit . a fat cross for himself by refusing to sign the corresponding agreement, after which the revolution of dignity began. well, i think that we can put an end to freedom, and as they note again, eh, in this article , the authors talk about the fact that russia has to receive a clear signal that ukraine is not a gray area

, that ukraine is not a fragment of the russian or soviet empire, that russia is part of the free civilized democratic world, part of the euro -atlantic community, and i think that when russia realizes this, it will have a serious impact on its strategy well, because it's just, as it were, first there for ignoring objections, yes, and then there will be negotiations , but in the end, acceptance. well, therefore, in this context, i think that earlier here, as a key point , earlier nato took into account the position of russia and we must admit it honestly, that is, nato took into account the position of russia and russia had a lot of tools to make it impossible for ukraine to join nato, well, it was enough to find one state that would object. and all decisions are approved unanimously. and i tend to think that the russians could find

several countries do not have to go far, here we have them nearby, yes, they will come already on may 9 , she watched and as of today, well, in the state in which russia is today and after what russia has done, well, i think that for sure she does not have the right of veto on introduction uh roughly speaking, she doesn't have the right to veto legally. she didn't have it before, we understand that, yes, remember this, when it wasn't an ultimatum, before a full-scale invasion, we put forward that nato should get in , it is not known where, and record that ukraine will not join nato, and that's why they were told similar things that it was a relationship between two entities and an independent, absolutely sovereign state and organization, where russia is, why should we take russia into account even then? they answered , but we understand that it was a de jure de facto position. and on today, no one will look back on this, so i tend to think that soon we will hear and see this

fateful decision, and i tend to think that it will also affect the course of these hostilities in the sense that nato will enter the war there or they will start helping there more, and not in this plan, but in the plan that it will be an important political signal. well, that is, if this terre- well, conceptually and strategically, russia has already lost, well, that is , that they are. are fighting well, we must realize that their territories in fact, they are interested in territorial gains, they are interested in sovereignty. well, they wanted ukraine to lose its state sovereignty either de jure or de facto, that is, it was possible to preserve some kind of formation there, to have a national football team of ukraine, some kind of national anthem, the flag was returned the soviet anthem would be alive. ukraine , which is free and strong in the soviet union, and happiness found this illusion where it would return the flag like in belarus

. yes, and they would build a scoop like this here. such a subject of international law that would move completely in the direction of national interests in russia, that is what they were interested in, well, the destruction of ukraine in principle . simply a secondary absolutely and intermediate goal and therefore the decision regarding euro-atlantic integration , well regarding european integration. i think that last year we already closed this political issue, now it must be implemented and i i hope that in the near future we will close the issue and with euro-atlantic integration, the application has been submitted, well, the application has been submitted, and i think that zelensky's words are absolutely correct here. i think they will be taken into account, that in case of a negative answer, this decision will not be understood, as the psychologist says, it will be a shame for bucharest. it will be very interesting, such a phrase europe must be united in its desire

to continue supporting ukraine, because as soon as putin feels that someone is hesitating, he will increase his blackmail volodymyr zelensky is convinced the unity of the entire civilized world will help expel the aggressor from the territory of ukraine and later erase it from world history and another direct speech of volodymyr zelenskyi is from the visit of the italian, this defense and this defense assistance given to us by various countries, including italy, for which i am grateful, it will not work out that way is putin he feels like a predator. when in this union a certain country becomes weaker in aid, he feels it very strongly and is very concrete .

then they do the same thing with sanctions, valuable packages are weakened, we see it, and then they agree with some countries to bypass the sanction, i have a question about those countries , why did they vote for sectional packages , and then find a format for how to bypass them, and we can see it. no one, no. idiot, no one is blind, everyone sees how the turnover of some countries is increasing from russia, and this is wrong, it will lead to a disaster, the more countries unite , the more putin or the notion of a dead end and vice versa does not seem to be pushing this the situation is the same as it was with finland, about which putin said let's move on , nato turned out to be closer than they thought and the further this blackmail can manifest itself, well, valentina , we have already heard the nuclear baton, we have heard the nuclear weapons, we have heard the attacks, and we have heard the launch of a missile against

britain. well, what what else can be blackmailed? is it, well, in fact, the countries just don’t care about it? switzerland has already given permission to transfer its weapons , by the way, it’s also an interesting, interesting point, so that other countries can transfer swiss- made weapons. also, uh, i tend to think. well, yes that is, in fact, switzerland agreed to transfer weapons produced by third countries that are located in switzerland. well, because it is. well, plus, you have to understand that soon there is cooperation in the industrial chain, that is , it is unlikely that there are weapons that are made from here to there in one country. blackmail does not work. well, because the russian federation is currently a terrorist state, regardless of whether this status is legally established for it, it is a terrorist state de facto, it is al-qaeda, or it is only about nuclear weapons and the place of struggle with the un with the right of veto in all other models of behavior in their attitude to