[000:00:00;00] in the end, they decided that it was all very expensive, so they decided to spend 250,000 dollars to remove this morality . you ask how to remove it? the amount is much more economical even than taking care of this banksy all his life, but everything is not as comical and absurd as you might think at first glance, because when they demolish this wall, of course, they will build a new one for themselves, and they want to sell this seagull for 247,000. well, almost for the amount they will spend is in a small deficit, but they say that such a work can even be sold if you try for a million, and that one is more. and you know in education

that in various arts, you still have to understand that art is also a commodity, not if maybe you were on the slide everything will be heard, but positioning is important, it is important how you sell, and if you create a proper story for a work of art, you can really raise the price, well , i will also mention the prices, more precisely, the box office, because the movie luxembourg luxembourg has already collected 32 million uah at the box office this is really a very good result. i hope that there will be even more. i emphasize why this is a very good result because the films from , well, it's not that there is no advertising. and you have a very small number of ads, but still , well, luxembourg luxembourg was not promoted as powerfully as mavka or let's say there's some crazy wedding 32 million - it's a super simple result, it's happening. by the way, what about antonio lukich's past companies, and people watched it, they liked it, they

told their friends, they advised them to go, and they advised their friends to go, and also now collected such a sum, i will say that if you have not seen this film for the first time, i highly recommend it, but you should definitely not perceive it as a comedy, because many people are disappointed . if you haven't watched it, many people don't even have movie theaters in the city, then you don't need to be upset, because this film will soon be available on netflix from june 14, and even later , a documentary about the film will be released, according to many viewers. this of the film and it turned out to be really funny funnier than luxembourg luxembourg really i confirm this i was at the screenings in the cinema october so far this documentary was shown only once e it was a charity screening and auction with the creators and e when is this film if its and when

more precisely, it will be dismantled a little and it will appear on the resource yes flix - this is a ukrainian resource where you can watch nashe kino both for money and not for money, and i will definitely notify you and advise you to watch it because, well, it really is very good ukrainian cinema. it is especially pleasing when you watch a good movie and understand that it is ukrainian. meanwhile, fans of the dead south. by the way, i, in particular, are thinking about the new frontman of this legendary band. he was yuriy eronetskyi. he was presented at concerts in lviv. zadanom, which took place in very, very successfully sold out , but you know how after every change of frontman , there are long discussions and people get used to the new voice. they either

get used to the new face of the band or not let's see how it will be with yuri, i'm a musician, of course, all the best, because i love dead rooster very much, and i want them to record new songs. 2021 is of course a big loss for ukrainian art, hmm well, but the case of the dead rooster continues in the morning and about connections

society and ukrainian society , the opinion, as they say , does. i am not only talking about the introduction of these women's carriages by the ukrainian railway after these simply incredible battles in social networks . a residence is such a facility or recreation center. i don't know what to call it, because there is a restaurant in the restaurant, there is a stage, a skating rink, there is a lake, there is something else there, but loboda wanted to perform they announced her concert, which was supposed to take place on august 25, that is, right after independence day, well, of course they know how to choose a date, i don’t know what they were in charge of or whether they were in principle keru of course it wasn’t all a huge scandal the concert was supposed to be for charity at least that’s how the organizers positioned it, they were supposed to collect money to the ent department for the repair of the lor-lor department of okhmatdyt, but then it turned out that okhmaty did not

know anything about this concert and about any quinoa, and in the end this concert was canceled, but i i understand with the intonation with which the post on instagram was written by this osokor, they are very dissatisfied with this result and the reaction of society and wrote , as it were, well, you know in which e what, ok, you don’t want to listen to the quinoa, don’t listen, the children will be left without money without a renovated department in okhmatit or something you are all to blame for the fact that children do not receive proper conditions for treatment, this is of course a big manipulation, i will also say and remind you that in marketing there is even such a thing as lice, well, in our ukrainian way, it is bleaching reputation, but there are different types of this washing, there is pin-caching, there is something else, that is, with the help of certain actions and assistance to certain

categories of society, ah, well, it is always ready to support, ah, people who got caught somewhere got caught. they are trying to whiten but svitlana loboda - it doesn't work at all, you all remember this epic story when she tried to somehow break back into the ukrainian scene almost from the very beginning of the full-scale invasion. well, sometimes she cried, then she said something else, new interviews in russian to things from which it was obvious to the bloggers that she wants to sit on two chairs and give something to the ukrainian audience and not to forget the pro -russian audience because she has a lot of russian audiences, but here in ukraine they just started calling her little because she talked about the fact that we all small people and we cannot do anything, as you understand, svitlana loboda is absolutely incomprehensible to ukrainian society in general, the transformation of ukrainian society, that we are not small people, and if

such a term is used in ukraine, such words as small people this does not mean that we cannot do anything. it means that every small person can contribute to a bigger cause with his small deeds . this is the philosophy we currently have, which svitlana loboda cannot understand in any way, and therefore she cannot organize even a small concert. in some small room , there are chairs like that where people will eat and she should perform. well, i don't know, of course i 'm curious, maybe like you, i'm watching these birds and quinoa, will she break through? on the ukrainian stage or not. if it still breaks through because there are people who support it, then it will be interesting whether it will be done by, for example, ani lorak, well , if she donates large sums for many years and will also whiten her reputation

, will they accept her back ukrainians are just curious. i think not, but we’ll see. well, i also want to remind you about another warning of ukrainians that exists now, which is currently being discussed in social networks, this film azovstal and the russian documentary and apparently, propagandist will be shown in bulgaria, but a lot of people caught on, and there, in particular, the writer tamara nyztana zernia wrote a post that was popular, quite a few people agreed . well, what do they say, we don't care about our own mass culture? the russians are overtaking us on this site. we must take up this matter . i want to say right away that well, first of all, i agree with mrs. tamara on many things, but she claims that we are not doing anything, but i want to deny it here because we have quite important achievements. for example, we

have repeatedly said on the air about the film 20 days in miriupol, which was shot by mstislav chernov, who has been traveling to various film festivals for several months and has been a huge success , and i emphasize that, judging by everything, this is an audience film, it was first shown at the very prestigious sundance festival in america, and there he won the audience prize if you look at various aggregators well, that is, these are sites where all kinds of reviews of viewers about companies are collected . for example, chronicles of hell, a documentary film about ma saw a lot of views, now there are many millions of views on youtube, and this film was also shown on german television quite successfully, because we are doing well with documentary, because the directors are even good at shooting for their own money

without any funding, but with regard to state funding , state funding, state support in general, state policy in the field of cinema, we really have big problems because cinema, too, just doesn’t want to do it, it seems there is something mysterious the strategy for the development of cinema until 2027, but it was seen only by selected people. people saw it and were able to analyze what was unclear and who wrote it is also not clear, and meanwhile this is a very important document that, before writing it, should have worked with the film community to simply compile different opinions on what the state cinema did not do. well, now let's move on to the ukrainian film festival. this year , the festival is taking place with a very small ukrainian presence, as the films include two films co-produced by ukraine, poland and ukraine, poland and france. well, in particular, there is a film

as it was presented in the program of the short meter, but the program of the short meter is not, well, the most visible program at cannes although there are also prizes given by ukrainian branches, but i will say the following: there are a lot of opinions about why ukraine is so there is an unnoticeable opinion that says that this is because last year our cinematographers made a non-coordinated political action, and the directors of this festival were offended, but not everyone agrees with this, because this action was it is enough that very often they talk about her as elegant, but we also cannot see that trade on the cannes site in the film market continues, for example, the russians bought the rights to 22 films of the legendary studio ghibli of the japanese director hayao, he is a softie and one of

my favorite directors from him great cartoons, but the russians were simply offered a lot of money, as they usually do with this one, and at the cannes film festival, and now at cannes, these companies are happy to sell them because they simply receive a lot of money from the russians. well, i will also remind you that the film discovery of the cannes film festival, the film "favoritka" was one of the executive producers of kostyantyn yolkin. actually, these cartoons were lost and bought, so you know the influence of russian money on world cinema is huge. we are talking not only about russian companies that are shown somewhere there receive prizes, and directly here we are talking about financing already some of these liwood films, and i will briefly tell you about the activities that took place at the cannes film festival, there are ukrainian ones. probably , i would like them not to be there, for example a fashion festival that took place at one of the bil khans, there was a positioning that it would be a representation of ukrainian culture in

its best form, also cinema. by the way , i renounced this event because on all advertisements and banners they are declared as informational sponsors. they said no, kamaliya performed there. oleg skrypka, there were some amazing shows there. mot and i will say that the audience in cannes. well, i dare say that it is quite snobbish, so refined, and of course. you see kamalia as a representative of ukrainian culture, i don't know if they i liked it with all due respect to kamaliya, but probably not in this place. but the main thing here is that there is a ukrainian pavilion, as usual at every almost every film festival, people who are cinematographers. my colleagues, journalists who are there now, say that almost unanimously they say that it is not very noticeable to put it mildly, but there they present different films and different projects in nadia. i understand that it is necessary to find some partners and so on, funding . for example, one of those who present

presented his projects was a certain maksym pirsenko. well, the quality of his films let's go. now i suggest you watch an excerpt from his film from 2011, it's just about a world war ii veteran who gets into a minibus in the st. george tapes, and let's listen to what the driver says to him, evaluate the acting as it is. i'm just running well, but the main thing is that maksym pirsenko, a former member of the sharia party, almost all the testimonies that i saw before. they are already worn out from the internet, but one thing remains on the youtube channel

of the editorial office of infay and from odesa, there is an interview with him let's listen to an excerpt, i defined a synonym for anatolia, and what happened before, before, before all these events in the 14th year, there was a very big , uh, information war, and there were very stupid, very many fakes, and there were some anatolians who worked , he developed not only the ukrainian phrygians, but also the russian positions of the helmsmen and about the influence or not of the actress yuliya synkevych yuliya we have been criticizing cannes for several months now . dependent on russian money or is it a sentiment? what is your opinion about this festival in the context of cooperation with russia and the attitude towards

russia, it really still remains the most prestigious film festival, perhaps the largest film market, and without the kangaroo , the festival itself would probably be almost impossible to exist, because it is about business, it is about sales, it is about the place where the key players meet eh but of course this sentiment towards cooperation with russia has such long-term roots ah and in fact they are integrated a lot programs or activities, er, even the film festival a long, long time ago. that is, it can be traced also by the fact that there were russian cinematographers or producers there, the jury of various programs, that is, by presenting them at the stands, er, pavilions, and so on, student parties. and all this is not unknown to us

even a well-known already somewhat odious one who is a consultant for eastern europe, but he spent a lot of time in russia, in fact, he translates a lot of russian films , he does translations of subtitles there, for example , for them, and he is actually a kind of consultant who recommends the film and he strongly defends the russians and their presence, and we saw last year that when kirill serebrennikov's appearance in the film program was criticized, he rushed to give interviews, comments to various media, write articles ... no less, he commented on this. i know that there were criticisms from the french as well, because at that time he was still working in young france, but at the cannes film festival he continues to work. and of course he will defend these

interests and if last year cannes was the first film festival since the full-scale deployment of russian authorities to ukraine at which you could actually see the reaction of the international community and then they had doubts to the last about, for example , granting press accreditation e.e. providing e.e. market accreditation or presence in the market in the movie market of russian companies and yet they refused it nevertheless they were still partially present there but much less in number until this year we see even in many articles about the fact that there, such and such a company concluded a contract for the purchase of rights to films in russia, such and such a company has already been written by the international media about the fact that they actually offer two or three times more film business, which is probably not in the best shape in the world

it is very difficult to refuse such offers , plus, literally, literally . the company has given the right to show 20 films to the legendary japanese studio ghibli , er, and they will officially show this entire catalog er, well, this studio is very large, it is one of the largest producers of cartoons with a good reputation. i think that we, they went to that is, after all, money matters, because konstantin himself said that they had fierce competition, but they knocked out this catalog, obviously paying several

times more. russians are not such a stain on their reputation now ah well, i think that of course the commercial component eh and money here have a very big importance eh, you know the russian market is a very big market eh and almost all even the majors want to have it that this is a huge contribution, let's say our own budget and the prosperity of their companies, and the big majors have left the russian market, but they still have to be, what is called in accordance with the sanctions that the state led, that is, they have somehow to reckon with them mini-managers, smaller judges of the company, they can already decide. of course, we do not know all the internal kitchens in the structure there and so on , but still, there is such an idea . what, for example

? that humanism carries beautiful values ​​and that it is impossible to leave this russian society without some kind of light at the end of the tunnel, because otherwise they uh, they condense their propaganda there and so on , that is, they are also repaired somehow there with a higher purpose and so on for example with european ones by big companies and the same tam rubber, for example, which continue to show the film in russia, they also communicate the message that people cannot be left without independent art without something that can actually, well, somehow enlighten them about what is happening in the external world fresh, so to speak. well, i think that russian propaganda very actively supports this message and uses it very actively, and of course, russian companies, they very quickly found

options in general. how to bypass sanctions or this perhaps not one company that directly concludes this agreement. and it may be several companies, and it is very difficult to even trace where the original agreement comes from. also, during our discussion, among cinematographers on social networks, there was such an opinion that i heard several times. -m, it is quite controversial, but it is popular , if they say. last year, the attention of the camera to ukraine was quite high, but our cinematographers expressed themselves politically , they even did one uncoordinated action and, as it were, the management, because it is such as if the political was offended and outraged. so, this year, even our film was not selected, at least one of the main programs of marina broda. and here marina vroda herself says that well , in particular, well, i don’t know if you can say

they are guilty, but because of this action. last year, because of the political activity of ukrainians and this year he is staying away from us, do you consider this opinion or not? well, i think that it is possible that there is some kind of fate, but fate is partial in this , of course, this is an assumption, but it is also necessary to understand what situation france itself is in and what was surrounded by protests during er, well, since the month of march. yes, er, and in fact , any such actions that can provoke cannes are not necessary, because it is about the holiday, it is about beauty , it is about er, celebrate glamor, and so on. as for the ukrainians, it's true. i'm very sorry that marina's film didn't make it into any of the programs. maybe there are such forces there, and again , we don't know the secrets of the selection. they have the right to ask about this, as well as

about the actual business, what will russia be? the film business and in this matter to us a-ah to us, in a broad sense, what does our state do in order to counteract this, how much did we propose and were we able to communicate that we have cool content that can be shown we have professionals who are worthy, how much did this dialogue take place in general well, i don't know and rather after all, it almost didn’t happen, only at such a small, not very high level . i think so, he went. the question is also that the ukrainian film festival itself, and the actual torefremo, who is the art director of this film festival, belongs to such a group. of the conservative old generation of the french bourgeoisie, and now we have also seen in the press some scandals with him there, uh, how he ran

over a policeman there, for example, uh , it seems to me that they are somewhat losing touch with reality, not very um, they just reflect that is happening in the world and they want to continue like this and live like this by the way, the parents are not showing a beautiful movie and forgot about the mission of the film festival in general about the fact that it should be just a movie that will show new talents highlight important topics which in the world they rule in us not to create this picture of the world, they live with old habits and old approaches, and this manifests itself in many ways, and for what you wanted at the festival , it is criticized, and i think that we can act with all this because there are also people who say, well, this is kadsk the film festival is really old-fashioned, they are conservative, you can’t fix them anymore. let them live in their holy glamour . we have other platforms, for example, a platform like

sundance is much more favorable to ukraine. it is much more appropriate for expressing some of our positions. can we still to somehow influence the pockets of the cherkasy film festival, to try to change some agenda, because in the last year we have unknowingly changed many agendas that were considered unchanged before, is it possible to do this in the cinema and how can it be done? it is definitely worth it and it should be approved at a high level and further these activities should not just be the activities of caring cinematographers even if these are professional associations associations it should be everything if in one concept that we actually communicate and russia is very good at this

, uh, very well copes with it because they adapt very quickly, they understand the value of cinema, they understand the weight, and they have been for many years or decades the image of russian culture of russian cinema was introduced, which did not actually happen in our country, and we still have the same activities of the ukrainian institute, which , well, simply cannot physically be there with a limited number of e-e teams that work with limited i just can't cover it all with meager resources, but it should be just such a strategy of cultural diplomacy that has well-thought-out messages, a well-thought-out system of financing and support. in their language in order to actually convey their messages, what were the reactions and successes, let's say, what were a year ago, they

were very often spontaneous, er, these decisions , that is, it was a direct challenge to what is happening, but they may not carry it further of a systemic nature and cannot take hold. that is, it is not necessarily equivalent to the fact that we convinced them that the russian presence there is bad. it was a forced measure at that particular moment, but then we still need to work in that direction so that they understand their place in history in the context of the world, ukrainian culture occupies there , of course, and what place does russian culture occupy there? it was yuliya sinkevich, the producer . behave and build your communications with such extremely important events in the world of art, that's all i have, i wish

you a peaceful evening, stay with the press , join the community with a ukrainian view of the world, become a sponsor of the espresso youtube channel , and this is access to exclusive content , personal thanks, pinned comments, special icons and the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click to sponsor and become part of the community with a ukrainian perspective in ukraine 17:00 news time on the espresso tv channel in the studio, iryna koval welcomes all viewers today, as a result of the shelling of the village of shipuvati in the kupyan district, a 61-year-old woman died , the head of the kharkiv military