[000:00:00;00] to the successes of the great ukraine this year, in particular, in the summer he said that he does not expect great achievements and instead expects that the russians will try at least once more to conduct a major offensive, perhaps in the direction of kyiv , since they do not give up hope that they will be able to win this war and have enough mobilization resources, if you would evaluate this, this, this, the opinion of mr. borel, do the russians really still have the opportunity to concentrate their forces for a major offensive this year, now the situation is such that the russian group that is trying to get the occupied territories having a strong force of about 400,000 personnel on the front line of defense, i.e., on the front line

, somewhere in the range of 180,200, and the issue of carrying out some offensive actions from the side, training is conducted in these reserves. according to various estimates , the maximum number of reserves currently owned by the russian federation there are about 30,000 any qualitative changes for the enemy within three to five months is simply impossible now e-e is in a state mainly about defense waiting for our offensive actions and to expect that the enemy will be able to in these conditions carry out offensive actions somewhere on kyiv in another area. i think that this is a certain exaggeration of the enemy. you are now saving all your reserves in order to respond to the compensation of our offensive actions in the directions. it is not clear at the moment where exactly the offensive will take place. the offensive actions are now taking place. the troops due to the fact that poor systems with e-e form the field both

by destroying reserves in the depth of the enemy's defenses . to carry out some powerful offensive actions, i still thought it was an exaggeration, although i really think that one of the directions is exactly where general sipsky was and the luhansk direction, where the russian grouping of troops is still powerful enough. i think that they will probably try to somehow ensure offensive actions there today kharkiv is in this area where this group is now located, eh, they will buy a fixer of crimes, now, by the way , hostilities continue without changes on the vinny front, it is quite tense on both sides, this area, well, it looks quite like this, well, no not easy on the other front line, we see that er has switched to a defensive strategy and i don't think that um we have to make some adjustments taking into account the statements of politicians who, in fact, clearly, clearly, as far as i'm concerned, do not

understand the situation happening on the front line, the possibilities of the russian army, and even more so the capabilities of the ukrainian army, which has already demonstrated several times how real actions differ from those forecasts issued by foreign political and military experts. we don't have time already. but it's very interesting that the interview came out on nv a-a premium, the truth is that there was an interview with uh, in the austrian monolithic tom cooper, and he, in particular , again expresses skepticism about f16, do you think this is a political decision, well, in a sense, there is ukraine i really wanted to take it, but don’t you think it will become a weapon that will change the course of the war, unlike the f-35, for example, there are other stels technologies out there, and it is quite obvious that journalists ask him what kind of weapon could do this, and he says that it could

change would this situation if because ukraine had would be millions of shells a month of 155-caliber and if, as he says, if ukrainian commanders could shoot at everything that moves, not counting shells, it would actually change the situation, and his phrase seems very important to me, he says that in fact it is - in fact, ah, ukraine needs weapons, a quote that will be so dominant in russian that you will kill many russians, but not suffer losses at all, this is the way to win this war, not through heroic defense , the last stage of defense in bakhmut or elsewhere. here this is the phrase of the austrian right, but this concept must be filled with possibilities and now we have really set optimistic estimates that it will be six days, which means that

we still have the most optimal indicators, we need to enter 500,000 b passes per month. there are restrictions on supply and now we have to carry out offensive actions optimally using what is available today and the domestic optimal concept of conducting hostilities, well , now this is what our general decides. we will conduct offensive actions with all restrictions and with all the advantages that we have accumulated today in terms of experience and armament, well, thank you, mr. serhiy, serhiy zorezivskyi, expert director of the defect express company, was with us at this hour. we will continue to talk with military experts about, in particular, new weapons the war about what will give ukraine again f16 on which issues are getting closer and closer to a practical solution and we are joined by bohdan dolinetsa aviation expert

yes good morning well, first of all, again , let's immediately return to the fresh news about the fact that many are the last days, every day we actually see attacks on the ukrainian capital, hundreds of shaheds have been used literally in this week, which has just begun, a huge number of ballistic missiles, including those used and shot down by ukrainian forces, is this a hunt for new ukrainian systems anti-aircraft defense and what? how long can we expect these russian eh-eh how to say it mass attacks yes yes yes if we talk eh about reserves, then we see, in principle , the periodic use of these shaheds by waves at the same time, if we talk specifically about chess, in contrast to the first places in use when they were used

, including for defeating certain targets , today we see that chessed is used more as a means of exhausting our air defense system, and this is primarily turn is also connected with their massive use , because as a rule... our anti-aircraft defense system it still used the one without a reserve to destroy the shaheds, or has not yet had time to restore its combat readiness, i.e. reload the corresponding launchers, or , in principle, for example. allows you to protect or settle this or that zone of responsibility, here if we talk in the second component specifically about shelling by cruise

ballistic missiles, we see here two regularities, first, as a rule, veneter occurs after e-e massive attacks with precisely such cheaper ammunition , secondly, the targets are, of course, primarily the air defense system, because if we are talking about such missiles as, for example , iskanders, which were used in the last attack, then e- the key feature of this missile is that it was developed to destroy and suppress the anti-aircraft missile defense system, that is, in principle, these are specialized missiles, as a rule. they have the possibility of use, including in addition to of the main combat unit, they can also throw out a number of such special charges, the task of which is to create either thermal traps for system defense or to be conditional false targets with appropriate radio repeaters in order to pull out real combat missiles during the flight of the corresponding

ammunition, if we are talking about the missile it is also worth mentioning that, in principle, according to the latest data, russia managed to unfortunately increase the production of suitable missiles for the purpose of striking a large territory there e-e, on average, an increase of 335% is estimated. well, if we talk about when the rocket will run out, then we must understand that , in principle, russia is capable of producing one and a half rockets of several types every day, that is , in general, we are talking about the possibility of producing about 70 rockets within a month. well, if we talk about the production of shahed here, too, we see a slight increase in intensity, this may be due to the localization of production for this drone in the territory of the russian federation. of course, it may to simplify the possibility of early production of a slightly larger number of these e-e samples of equipment for a certain period of time, at the same time, these

missiles and shahids and cruise missiles are very dependent on navigation systems . that is, we are talking about the system of the first pro-russian us, etc. and of course, manufacturers of chips for data even valuable systems are primarily western countries, but in principle no one today is capable of producing chips for the existence of the main system and others . the ukrjet company produces it, and it is the u.j. 22 airborne attack drone that participated in the raid on moscow. do you know anything about these drones and are they really like that or are they really ukrainian drones or are they really so successful that they even covered such a long distance if we say about the manufacturers of drones, we must understand that today in ukraine

there are actually a lot of companies that are engaged in the development of drones. well, if we talk about the specific eg-22 drone, then in principle, this development was created before the war, according to this company has several different drones, including kamikaze drones, the task of which is to pass the air defense forces, so it was whether it was this particular drone company or some other company that is now difficult to answer because, unfortunately, there is very little information, including no information specifically there about e- e discovered fragments that could be used to identify exactly which drone it is. but at the same time, we must understand that, in principle, today in ukraine there are enough different manufacturers capable of producing drones, including kamika for which can safely fly to moscow and, including, destroy enemy military facilities , and in addition, if we are talking specifically about passing through the topic of air defense, it should be remembered that the basis is simply the air defense of the russian

federation, it is precisely the soviet systems , mainly the s-300. but of course there are slightly more modern conditional s-400s or their minute armor, but at the same time having only against such means as drones. they are often ineffective, so the other day i see, well , it was reported that there were, so to speak, full in occupied berdyansk, and here i am i already see, i saw today the obituary of one russian a-and that one died with uh-uh, well, with the word s300, a russian one that was stationed in berdyansk was destroyed and also died, and accordingly this uh-uh, this is the department that served these anti-aircraft fighters, and they got into this obituary and i understand that if you assume that it was a franco-british missile, uh, this one, by god, i’m already forgetting everything again . well, the word is with these new missiles, does this mean

that the s300 is actually powerless against them, and could it be the rocket is what it is the anti-radar that we received from the americans even earlier is used. yes, and what can we say about the possibility of using it, in fact, both cases can be here, that is, if we are talking about a conditional avram missile specifically against a location one, then it primarily detects and destroys the corresponding systems eh that emit eh -e these or other sanatoriums. that is, it can be a jamming center, it can be a radio-electronic intelligence center, and of course it can be air defense systems, such as esterista, because they have an active radar that is, for such kamram missiles, they are actually a red rag, and this missile quickly finds and physically destroys it. at the same time, it could be different and work and correspond to the development structures, that is, they could determine the positions placed according to the division and use the previously announced storm shadow missiles. that

is, according to the missile is specifically designed for the destruction of such fortified objects , including these may be certain objects that are covered by anti-submarine defense systems such as the s300, because this missile is belongs to the winged class, children were allowed at a relatively low altitude and, at the same time, it is quite uh. so-called inconspicuous from the point of view of uh. to destroy even if they will be in some protected environment and be in an environment. your visa can also be said to be an aviation expert, but from austria , i remember tom cooper again today. the media and he again expresses skepticism about f16. he does not think that in the 16th , even in large numbers, the course of the war will be seriously changed

. you think it is more a political decision . he says that the dialogue is such that he says that well, they say that a person in the 16th will deliver to you. there are 12 rockets, the day of use to the desired target, while, for example, gamers can deliver more than 100 such valence rockets and increases the speed - the rockets themselves are reduced by the probability that they will be intercepted by the enemy's anti-aircraft air defense. that's also at least 2/3 cheaper it it will be fine, he says that in principle it is expensive, he called the service, he says that most likely these will be quite old modifications that are already 40 years old and in the conditions of even difficult and stressful operation in the field , they will fail very quickly and the word mass is in him

explanations why the f16 will not change anything much, unless they affect the morale. well, he says that even he says that if even the same rifles or the same f-18 hornets would be better planes or euro fighters, but even they would nothing much he says that yes and that in ukraine they would give without stealth there they would give, for example , the same i 35 and different modifications, this would immediately change the war because ukraine would be able to fly into the territory that is covered by russian air defense and do what to you wants, but this will not happen, and that is why big changes are not expected. it would be better to spend these resources on something else, on shells for the same gamers , this is the opinion of tom cooper, yes, in fact, it is necessary to understand that of course, a separate aircraft in itself is not a universal tool, including we understand that this is an aircraft of the fifth generation a4 + generation , that is, despite the fact that it remains quite

effective and better than the soviet models of equipment, it is still not one of the most advanced or modern in the world, so to speak it's about the er change, the er key task is the transfer of data on aircraft types, it will be the strengthening of air defense and we are the crown of their application in ground operations. minimum their resource, after all, periodically comes to an end, to continue it becomes either difficult or, in principle, impossible, but at the same time, we understand that the corresponding i in 16 this will be the basis of the future of the ukrainian air force, of course , one more time and we risk it. by the way, someone will be from the other side if we are talking about uh , accordingly, the analogy of using x hymerson, then we have to understand that, in principle, both hymers and f16 use slightly different types of ammunition. well, we understand that

, unfortunately, they do not supply us with that amount in echelons ammunition for conditional farmers that we would like here they are somewhat limited, even if we say there is just ammunition per day per donheimer, so conditionally, in order to ensure the full possibility of using this himersive during the place, 3,000 ammunition is needed, and for conditional 10 or 20 such himersives 30 or 60,000 munitions, which we understand that no one in the world today is capable of producing and including delivering to ukraine in a conditional 30 e-e calendar days. in this way, the supply in 16 will allow, among other things, to increase the pressure of ukraine and the armed forces of ukraine using conditional not only those ammunition for farming that are transferred but also other means in that is, we are talking about uncontrollable or fixed bombs and various air-to-ground missiles that can be used as in 16, of course, which e- eh, they cannot be launched from the conditional heimers

, well, thank you for that. explanation bohdan to the lenses, the aviation expert was with us. airplanes of the center for human rights, the change of the e-e panionisiy good morning, padinysh, i recently read about the demography of the e-e hmm ella libano said that in order to ensure the reproduction of generations in ukraine , every woman in ukraine should give birth to at least one child after the war but she says that it is almost unreal in the conditions that exist now and we understand that simply having a child is one thing, it must be raised, it must be safe, it must be someone from whom

to give birth to that child, in the end, in other words, different question i just why am i repulsed by this information from this information or what russia is doing to the ukrainians now or sooner or later it will be defined as the genocide of the ukrainian people because we ukrainians say this to each other and repeat this to the world in order to to call it genocide, you need much more evidence, and in the end, the holodomor in ukraine is still totally not recognized in the whole world as a genocide, so that all countries recognize that it was the purposeful extermination of ukrainians, look at us, there are several aspects, first of all, that before

genocide, in principle, as a separate crime, is treated very cautiously because, although again, we do not have worse and better crimes, so to speak, there is no hierarchy of international crimes, but genocide is very often called a crime of crimes, and that is why when it comes to calling some actions genocide approaches very carefully, it is necessary to collect as much evidence as possible, and it is the most difficult to prove it. in this very genocidal intent , that is, not only that the actions fall under the crime, but that these actions were committed with this very national purpose to destroy a certain group in whole or in part, and the fact that it is difficult to prove it, and in particular, it takes a long time, is true, but there is one aspect in which i am convinced that there is actually enough evidence, all that remains is to collect it properly and follow it analytically, this intention is the issue of the deportation of ukrainian children and their transfer to to the russian family. at the moment , genocidal intent is very clearly being traced there, because

we see all the actions that russia is committing , in particular, in the occupied territories, this is the atmosphere in which children are now changing these are educational measures, training entirely according to the russian system with the corresponding russian narratives, these are cultural measures, these are constant efforts to separate them from the ukrainian group , either by sending them to be axed so that they are in a russian atmosphere, or, in principle, if these are children deprived of parental care, they are immediately taken to russia in order to isolate them from their national group and give them as much opportunity to return as possible, so this intention is very clearly traced in these actions, and men it seems that this is not a matter of as much time as in other aspects before the reclassification of these actions not simply as the deportation of children but as genocide ah, actually, i wanted to ask , it struck me, well, what struck in principle, eh

. probably, it impressed more of our eh foreign friends and, in principle, people who follow what is happening in russia , recently you know that lindsay gregg , an american politician, a senator, met with president zelensky and he said that what did zelensky say? he said that what is actually the best is the best way to use taxpayers' money, and that is that it is a weapon that helps kill russians in ukraine, and by the way, many others are repeating this phrase . i recently saw something similar, one of the belgian politicians wrote that just as it supports ukraine, commenting on some receipts from belgium, we see that they have announced almost 2 billion euros in military

aid denmark, sweden is handing over ultra-modern infantry fighting vehicles absolutely super cv 90 er, this is it. kombat left 90, these are very cool cars in ukraine, but what am i leading all this to? it’s fantastic, as it was commented on on russian television, on the solovyov program, a well-known russian propagandist , margarita simonyan, a well-known propagandist , the founder of rashi today, an english-language channel of russian , which seems to have hit the bottom even for margarita simonyan, it looked quite wild, but it definitely looks wild for the whole world, let 's listen to the secrets. i have already instructed our employees to look into this and there obviously glue he says literally the following he says русские russians a down

says they don't die and русский умирают eh this is the money we spent the best ever and exactly between these two phrases with glue that is they show zelensky now he said it in a different context or he really did and said that we need to figure it out and if lady graham really said that the money to kill the russians is the best money the usa has ever spent if he really said it i hope that my son lives in our country, i am here well, hands are here. platova's students are here . the students of the court's platova's students paid for it. it's not a problem. we have a phone number at the address

. what are the problems? безотвественность how would it be loaded? in general, when we don't give an answer to any such thing, it's a blackout and they're looking for a slob, so i hope our team will gather and other people will act on the basis of this павел i will remind the audience of the court fee, in particular for those who do not remember it, well, everyone knows, in fact, that he is a russian nkvdist who participated in assassinations, attempted murders outside the borders of the ussr, in particular, he is the murderer of yevhen konovalts, a ukrainian military figure of the ukrainian people's republic, and therefore a- and mistress i want to ask in fact this is a call for the assassination of an influential american politician on live tv knowing that russia

constantly uses such uh murders abroad and how much it can in principle be assessed now from a purely legal point of view from the point of view of some international law is it possible to somehow respond to such calls well, in fact, there are two aspects of this issue, let's say so, that is, calls for the murder of a certain politician - this is a separate issue, it is, if it is an individually directed crime, and here it will be necessary to consider it from this point of view point of view, when we consider these appeals , we will not consider them in the context of the armed conflict between russia and ukraine, the war waged by russia against ukraine, because it does not take place in the context of this conflict, this is a separate issue if we are talking about propaganda in general and about calls

to kill ukrainians or to abduct children for the deputation of children or other ukrainians , this will be a completely different issue, it will directly relate to the war that is taking place between russia and ukraine, and then these calls will be evaluated completely differently another, for example, there is a separate aspect to the crime of genocide - this is a separate crime of public incitement to genocide, and even in order to prove this crime and bring it to punishment for it, it is not necessary to prove that genocide enough happened to prove that calls for genocide were made, and in fact, from everything that was said by russian propagandists, starting even before the full-scale invasion, some of them are actually going to a normal prosecution, and in fact, in our national system, there are already several proceedings with

the announcement of e condemnation and accusation of some propagandists for incitement to genocide . means this deportation of people from the occupied territories carried out by russia. in fact, this is the kidnapping of ukrainian people and ukrainian children. well, what can be opposed to this in principle and how will it have consequences ? we talked, dear friends, our marathon continues, what lies ahead for us andriy eseychuk and i will have 3 hours

. in the next hours, we will also analyze the situation at the front. he will say i just think i opened well yes yes yes in a word i don't notice i don't notice how this ether passes 3 hours about the past very quickly two hours ahead well now just now a fresh selection of news is ahead angelica season is already with us this means she will tell you about them angelica congratulations i congratulate you again, colleagues. thank you. in this issue, i will tell you about the consequences of the night attack by shaheds on kyiv . unfortunately, there are casualties and injuries . however, the boomerang is returning to the russians this morning over moscow.