[000:00:00;00] when to exclude one of the bills, thank you dear colleagues, the 138th amendment was authored by krulka, it was rejected by the committee, please vote for 58, the decision was not made, ivan ivanovich 336 , your amendment, please, dear ruslan oleksii, er, this is actually a key amendment to this bill, i would like everyone to hear it e-e colleagues who are in the hall e-e the changes proposed by the project will lead to the loss of control by the state over the property that was included in the authorized capital and transferred to the nst with the right of economic management. so

such state property can be alienated or written off by decision of the nst board without the consent of the state. expropriation and write-off of nst property is regulated by legislation and must be carried out in accordance with the procedure approved on the alienation of state-owned objects approved by cabinet resolution no. 803 and the procedure for writing off state-owned objects ownership was approved by cabinet of ministers resolution number 13-14. i would like to ask in this regard that paragraph six , section one of the draft law, to exclude this is an extremely important amendment that concerns protection of property and i believe that the chairman, please, according to the position of the committee colleagues, first of all, the nstu cannot simply put something anywhere, even if it will sell something somewhere only through transparent, only through state mechanisms colleagues, the cabinet of ministers will clarify

all these procedures in addition, but colleagues, you all know the melnikov pencil is a soviet-style piece of equipment that costs millions to maintain. my colleague mykola knyazhytskyi had a great idea. we are working on it . what is more, we are legal. regarding the media, this technical clarification has already been allowed by colleagues, therefore ivanovych, with all due respect, we rejected it, because it is already in the law . regarding the media, we are just technically clarifying the norm. dear colleagues, amendment 336 authorship of krulka was rejected by the committee . you have heard the arguments of the parties. for 55 the decision was not adopted, the next 338 amendment, please

, krulko, thank you, dear ruslan oleksiyovych, you know, but i would just like to add to what the chairman of the committee was talking about, you are absolutely right there is a number of properties that er takes money that could be directed to completely different things, the product, and not to maintaining buildings. i even know a specific figure, a pencil costs 120 million uah per year of maintenance from the state budget, i understand this perfectly, but in that what time am i? i want to pay attention to everyone. let's have a profile committee , create an appropriate working group and monitor it in the order of parliamentary control, because there is property in the regions. it is located in the center of regional cities so that this property is not sold off. for a product to be created there, for local tv channels to work and for people to have access to local television and to local radio

, which our citizens really need, so i would ask, please, 338 amendment authored by khrulka rejected by the committee, please vote for 62 decision not taken next 341 amendment authored by khrulka be thank you, dear mr. chairman, ivan krulko, faction of the fatherland , this is my last amendment to this bill.

in accordance with the implementation of this law, the mechanism of parliamentary control, we have to protect the property that is currently owned by the state, that property that is unprofitable and that currently draws working capital, definitely something needs to be done with it, but it is also reasonable that it can be used for other needs that can be used in including in the interests of our public broadcaster, but in general i would really like to thank you for your work on this draft law, for the fact that you put european standards into it, and i wish for our public broadcaster to really become like that and be number one in the television ratings among all other channels. then it will be really effective reforms that thank you for the 341th amendment authored by the rounder

by the rejection committee, please note and vote for 58 decisions not taken dear colleagues, we have come all the amendments that were taken into account, now we move on to the amendments that are being confirmed and we start with the two amendments that the noble mr. yurchyshyn, people's deputy yurchyshyn yaroslav romanovych told us about, these are 178-179th, they are one committee taken into account the second taken into account partially you have heard the position people's deputy yurchyshyn explained why he demands that the committee's decision be confirmed, the head of the committee explained why they should be left in the version proposed by the committee, or should we support it, so we put 178 amendment by poturaeva's authorship in turn, it is taken into account by the committee, at the same time people's deputy yurchyshyn asks for this

i put the amendment to confirm the decision of the committee, therefore i confirm amendment 178, i ask the people's deputies vote 178 colleague 178 for the 191st amendment will not be taken into account the following amendment 179th authorship of abdulin it is partially taken into account at the same time people's deputy yurchyshyn asks the committee to confirm this decision therefore i put 179 179th 1.79 i said that it is partially taken into account dear colleagues it is partially taken into account, that is why i put this decision of the committee

on amendment 179 for confirmation, i ask you to vote for 208, the decision was not adopted, the amendment will be considered rejected, so on , please stefanishyna 204-25 two minutes and then let's put them and then there will be one more amendment to confirm 174-a. i forgot who will put yes to everything. then please stefanishyna dear colleagues, first of all i want to thank you all for not supporting the amendments that really expand the possibilities for alcohol regulations for the people, the next two amendments that will be discussed also concern

alcohol advertising. mykyto is the author of these amendments . and i am a co-author of this draft law, and i was very surprised when i signed the second reading has become, well, frank lobbying of alcohol-alcohol companies, and the european union definitely does not require us to expand alcohol advertising as proposed by amendments 204 and 205. advertise alcohol under the guise of prodex in tik tok and other social networks that our children use, i have a question well, to you mr. nikita and to all of us well , today during the war we will be engaged in

promoting even more alcoholism in our advertising of alcohol to society is definitely not the right time and believe me the representative of the medical committee there are various other proven medical drugs that can help people relieve stress and alcohol is definitely not the not the method that we need for our mental health although i understand that everyone we are tired and everyone is not feeling well, so i am asking you to fail, as you did just now with the amendments raised by my colleague 24-25 we should not expand the advertising of alcohol today, especially for our children, thank you , the position of the committee, nikita ruslanovych, please i will explain what just happened in the hall, many people said that we should give media without oligarchic influence, without that , i congratulate you, it means that the amendments are not completely calculated financially, something there, i will involve

the alcohol mafia and conscience, you must have something to say, it means that they left the ukrainian media without money, i you congratulations, they will convey to you, hello to you, all regional media, national media, i congratulate you. as for the internet , my colleagues, it was not regulated at all, so we did at least something to regulate it, and when you tell colleagues about those who are in to the chinese jurisdiction, well, go tell those who or instagram what we here in ukraine have allowed, what prohibited, have we done anything to regulate it. and you say no , so you did it badly. sanctions without any responsibility dear colleagues, we vote for those amendments , amendment 204 authored by poturaev and other

colleagues, it is partially taken into account at the same time deputy stefanishina asks that such a decision of the committee be put in confirmation, therefore i i put amendment 204 in the version in which it is partially taken into account for the vote. i ask you to vote for 198. the decision was not adopted and the 205th amendment was taken into

account by the committee. it was authored by nikita poturaeva and colleagues. amendments not adopted are considered rejected dear colleagues, i understand that there will be one more amendment zablotskyi will put 174 and after that we can move on to voting for the law as a whole everything is correct, please zablotskyi. thank you, pan-speaker. dear colleagues, please put this amendment on confirmation, do not support it. as far as i know, discussions have already taken place after the committee meeting and the head of the zone committee with the fact that it can be transferred to another bill. in short, the amendment is not at all related to the subject of advertising as such it is certain that the state policy regarding cigarette smoking is proposed to be transferred to the shoulders of our traders. it is proposed to prohibit the display of cigarettes. i propose to solve this in another bill and i do not want to now to impose on our entrepreneurs, whom we already spoil by blocking tax invoices and other problems, additional costs

with the re-registration of absolutely all other retail outlets, now is not the time to do it. as far as i know , it is fundamentally a political agreement to do it. at least with transitional adequate periods and not today for tomorrow and in general , it is correct to solve such a question not with a washing machine, not a relevant law, but with a certain discussion procedure, thank you, the position of the committee , please, colleagues valevska, pay attention after that how did you deprive the independent media of independent money? please pay attention to this conflict, it also means that none of us is happy that children go to school across rivers where there are cigarettes or children go with their parents to a supermarket there are benches with cigarettes, this is true and indeed in many european countries - not everyone has it closed, but in poland, for example, it would be possible to accept this amendment without question and i

voted on the committee, but you have in mind that there are uncalculated possible losses for the national budget from excise taxes and from local from the collection from the lungs, so make up your mind, colleagues, you have already done a lot today to support the ukrainian economy, can you take another powerful step, i will, i will vote, as i said, this vote at the committee, i will support my decision , i will not change and you will decide for yourself dear colleagues volodymyr mykhailovych, by the way , this is yours. the amendment to the committee's decision has been taken into account. i am now announcing it. wait, because i think you are indignant that you are now i will announce everything. dear colleagues, if you allow me dear colleagues 174 the amendment authored by vyatrovych and other colleagues, it was taken into account by the committee, at the same time, people's deputy zablotskyi asks to submit such

a decision to the committee for confirmation , therefore i put 174 amendment, i ask to vote for 158 decision not taken dear colleagues, we have completed the passage of this draft law , the discussion has passed, it is very good, we are moving on to making a decision please get ready, this is the european integration law. the draft law on amendments to the law of ukraine on advertising regarding the implementation

of european legislation, the national legislation of ukraine by implementing certain provisions of the act on audiovisual advertising in brackets of the european convention on transfrontier television , directive 2010/13 of the european parliament and the council of the eu on audi visual media services from march 10, 2010 as amended by eu directive 2018/1808 of november 14, 2018 and to some other laws, law registration number 92.06 ready to vote, i ask the people's deputies to vote for 298

decisions, the law was adopted as a whole, i congratulate my colleagues, the next danylo oleksandrovych, the procedures , please, danylo hetmantsev, dear colleagues, voting, these draft laws concern consumer lending and write-off of consumer loans for internally displaced persons, people are waiting for these draft laws. i propose to change the e- it is the order of consideration of issues on the agenda and to consider them now, this is the second reading , there will be no amendments. thank you. agreed with the factions.

there is a proposal, let's vote, let's not vote, well, there is such a proposal, because there are two draft laws, according to danylo oleksandrovych, everyone said that they will not , no, no, danylovych says that everyone agreed without amendments, no, dana oleksandrovych to oleksandrovych, let's go to the state property fund, let's solve it, then let's let us they didn't make a storm and you will have time, you will have time to talk objectively with your colleagues, so we are going to the next draft law 82:50 dear colleagues, this is a draft law on amendments to the law of ukraine on the state fund of the property of ukraine regarding the optimization of the structure of the state property fund of ukraine, this is the second reading dear colleagues please tell me if

anyone will insist on taking into account their amendments no one will insist on taking into account their amendments correctly thank you or will someone insist on your amendments for a second i understood two minutes, yes, three minutes, please, yes, volvo , for a long time, nina petrovna, please dear colleagues , in order to find all the amendments, i want to inform you of something, because in fact the changes to the law on the state property fund, which the readings concerned only changes to the structure of the fund, as well as the appointment of deputy heads of the fund as political positions , this project was supplemented by the introduction of changes to a number of laws that would definitely have to be discussed

as a result of the discussion that was going on here and in the hall before continued, we still found an option that was proposed now in the second table, repeated before the second reading, but i want to pay attention and ask that such decisions be made in separate draft laws so that you understand that now the procedure for the transfer of confiscated assets to a confiscated person is changing, which is in effect today, starting from the fact that the decision of the higher anti-corruption court is sent to the cabinet of ministers, and the cabinet of ministers then determines which body from the state institutions will deal with the further fate of these assets or the sale or management or in some other ways, now in this draft law, this function is transferred

completely to the state property fund, deeply understanding that if structural changes, they are extremely necessary for the new head of the foundation, in relation to such changes, i would like to understand where and when we lost the army as an institution that was created precisely with the powers and professional skills and requirements for all those working in the army, where did we lose it, why can't we restore it in order to this institution was engaged in such processes. but nevertheless, i think that you want to experiment and provide this opportunity exclusively first for the state property fund and then for other institutions due to the fact that as a result of all the discussions, we managed to

protect the investment climate, the rule of law. this gave us the opportunity to unblock this draft law. and now to vote, but i will repeat it again, this is a big experiment. we will support this draft law in order to provide the head of the prime minister with additional opportunities now, but i wanted the committee to monitor the implementation of this norms of its efficiency, irrationality, otherwise we will lose part of the economy because of such actions , thank you, please, there is no need to react, this is a compromise, i thank you later, i know yulia volodymyrivna 5 minutes dear colleagues of yura volodymyrivna 5 minutes after that, as far as i understand, the 209th amendment will be introduced by the borrower and 201 by the frieze and after that we proceed to the vote, we agreed that no one will insist anymore yuliya volodymyrivna 5

minutes please dear friends i would like to be with you at all let's talk a little about what the state property fund is doing now, in order for me to be argumentative, i'll just give you one example in november 21 of the year there is such an elektronmash plant this is quite strategic the company was given 40 million dollars at the auction for it in november 21st at the exchange rate of 970 million uah, but then this result was destroyed, it was completely canceled and 40 million , and the country did not receive an effective owner, they remembered the electric mash 40 million

november 21- before the war, now practically yesterday, during the war, the electronic mash was put up for auction and it was simply given as a gift for 3 million dollars, you feel the difference of 40 million and 3 million, this means that if you squander state property while the people of ukraine are at war, you give everything in the world that is ukraine is worthless, you are just committing a crime against the ukrainian people, go sell your apartments today during the war, sell your company during the war, just get rid of everything today when there is no market, there is no demand for anything, do you understand that this is corruption or not last time when voted a law on

which at least 1,200 state -owned enterprises will be liquidated, this is also a collapse of the state property fund . what do you think that the people gave you the right to liquidate 1,200 state-owned enterprises or where the state share is behind your back at that time when the people are at war, you understand that these 1,200 enterprises that you set for liquidation under the previous laws could be made into a powerful part of ukraine's economy if the right investors were involved , the right loans were provided, and the state supported us, then we would simply be a country that has industrial sense, what is being done today state property funds - this is where the industry of ukraine is when state-owned

enterprises with a share of the state are liquidated when these enterprises are really destroyed elektronmash strategic enterprise is sold for money and budget gets nothing and this law, the draft law that you are currently considering is not just about changing the structure. it is about the structure that will allow during the war, while everyone is fighting , to sell everything that we have in the state without consulting with ukrainian society, and this draft law is considered as a priority at a time when kiev is being shelled at a time when the parliament gathered almost under the impact of ballistic missiles in order to sell everything that the people of ukraine have, but here not only this, but also

how small forms of small privatization are sold key strategic mines of ukraine, this is a law. and this already means a blow to our energy security, because mines cannot be sold as a small privatization. and in general , a state that wants to have a strategy of energy independence. pay attention to our coal industry, which is part of this, i am not talking about the fact that this law is practically riddled with corrupt things when, for example, if you bought something at an electronic auction, even if you bought something illegal , this raiding is prohibited in court , it is said that it has already been done and goodbye. i don't understand what you are deputies of the verkhovna rada who represent

the working people in this hall, except that you represent the interests of the people . fris 201 and after that we vote for the law as a whole , i ask to invite people's deputies thank you , dear chairperson andriy kuziychuk, faction of the motherland, zhytomyr region dear colleagues , the draft law on the powers of the state property fund probably got into it a little by accident the privatization amendment is a state step today, more than ever, gala coal remains a strategically important industry, especially during a full-scale war , especially now, when there is a shortage of electricity , the state must prepare for the next heating season, and the state must now take care and develop state mines, increase

its own production, and we held a professional ban movchan, the representative of the committee, will confirm the discussion in the parliament with his colleagues. and we agreed that we will introduce this amendment to confirm and exclude this norm, we need to develop our own coal industry, thank you, thank you, the only thing before i speak before you is that it is in the table - it is amendment 210, it is partially taken into account, please oleksiy dear colleagues, good afternoon, this amendment is very simple. it is about the synchronization of ukrainian legislation on privatization what is the point? in 2000, the law on the privatization of coal mining enterprises was adopted. it is very different from the general privatization legislation. there are no electronic auctions, there is no competition. i i don't know what motivated the parliament of that convocation when adopting this bill, but from the point of view of the market and