[000:00:00;00] hpp to spend billions of hryvnias to restore this powerful monster, we are also convinced that the experts of the all-ukrainian vocation league of other public organizations for several years before this, not even in connection with this full-scale aggression, were constantly talking about what we should think about it is possible that there is another direction of energy development in the south of ukraine according to the conclusions of the institute of renewable energy of the national academy of sciences of ukraine , which were in the 11th year in their research, and confirmed that in the southern region of ukraine domestic needs can be provided exclusively through renewable energy sources, wind and sun, and build again, regulate the flow of the dnipro. that is so categorical. today, i am simply

not convinced by this statement. we must think in other engineering categories, other technological solutions in our time, at a time when the whole world of europe er, they increase the percentage of renewable energy sources in their reco-balance, they do not focus exclusively on nuclear, and even more so on hydroelectric power plants, which have a small percentage, as in ukraine, a small percentage percent in the energy balance, but by building such structures many, many years ago, we turned the powerful dnipro river into a technological ditch into a cascade of hydro nodes of reservoirs that simply cross the stream and destroy any possibility of natural restoration of the river flow and restoration of natural and natural river ecosystems in this case and in spite of such

historical statements energy and ecologists still call for a different look at this region in the future because there are dozens of countries in the world that do not have nuclear energy metallurgical enterprises, but they thrive exclusively at the expense of natural territories that tourism, recreation, health, and possibly the south of ukraine should stop being considered as a source of obtaining the squeezing of all natural resources, obtaining export money at the expense of sowing the territory at the expense of negative effects on the natural environment and negative climate changes, the contribution of which is making the south of ukraine by growing such a quantity of grain and other crops, that is , another way is possible and we need to

think about it very urgently now and think about the future ukraine in the 21st century is not an agrarian monster that squeezes every ton of grain out of the borders of ukraine, the fertility of our soil and water resources, priceless water resources of fresh drinking water, and we must differ from the barbaric russians, who in a few days turn millions of cubic meters of fresh water on a dirty stream, which then flows into the black sea coastal strip , freshening the black sea coastal strip , disrupting the balance of the natural eco from the natural marine ecosystems in the coastal strip, and, well, losing this fresh water so incompetently, we we should think about the future of ukraine as a green transition and think from the standpoint of the european green course and 100 from

the point of view of preservation of nature conservation areas, restoration of disturbed ecosystems from the development of renewable energy and not to say that we will never be able to do without nuclear energy and hydropower to restore ukraine green restoration of ukraine is possible precisely due to the use of new modern approaches so i just wanted to clarify in this vein and what about crimea, how can crimea live without the northern crimean canal and the water that flowed there. this is the ukrainian territory. we will also have to use it in some way

. let's put it this way, when we ask ourselves the question so often. of ukraine and we will again think about development from this point of view. i would like to insist once again that we have to talk about water in the crimea only to the extent that this territory can be used exclusively as a nature conservation area because enterprises, including chemical enterprises, the same crimean titan and others that were on the territory of crimea, they took this water, this industrial enterprise needed water, but besides, first of all, this is a unique natural pearl of the black sea coast - this is an area with pictorial plants with a unique microclimate with it has a huge recreational and health potential, and i strongly believe that it is this direction

that needs to be developed, and if we talk from this point of view, then again energy can be given by the sun, the wind, energy sea ​​waves, i.e., crimea can be provided with energy at the expense of renewable sources. and if we are talking about water for e tourist crimea, for recreational crimea , this water will be enough . until the 14th year , we spent every year on pumping dnieper water to crimea, that is, everything should be measured not only by some global categories of industry, which did not work for ukraine, turned ukraine into a raw material appendage of transnational

corporations, we should generally think about the model of sustainable balanced development of ukraine, including crimea, and balanced development is such development of countries and regions of production and consumption that enables natural ecosystems to restore and preserve natural resources not only for the use of the current generation, but also for the use of the next generation generations and this paradigm is already the paradigm of the entire world of the european union and the leading countries of the world and this paradigm ensures the development of the economy because european countries do not stand still but look, they are abandoning nuclear energy, they are switching to organic farming, most civilized countries reuse resources and do not destroy primary resources all the time, and the main thing is that they use such technologies that allow saving primary resources, and therefore we should not

now talk about the restoration of ukraine, a component of which there is further mining, predatory use of our main resource of the earth, and the main thing is other approaches to models and production and consumption of ms. tetiana if to talk about the animal world, we know that there are national natural parks there and the lower dnieper and white coasts of sviatoslav veliky lug black sea biosphere reserve eh, how many species could we potentially lose in reality eh after this tragedy, and with regard to fish, because freshwater fish got into the black sea and what is the fish that lives in the black sea and what is used to living in a salty environment, how does it react to fresh water that got into the water, when we

talk about the loss of wildlife , animals, birds, reptiles, small insects, that is, everything that was alive, then we can talk about several thousands of living creatures that could not save themselves, they simply could not save themselves a priori because the territories that were near the kakhovskaya gs were flooded in a very short time it was a matter of hours and that's why a lot of animals, well, it was such an explosion, it was such a salvo, and that's why many animals simply couldn't save themselves in the first place, well, those who can't move quickly, but some animals to some animals in more distant territories

from the current itself from the first pe - the first tens of kilometers from the descent of the kakhovsky reservoir, of course, they managed to move and perhaps managed to survive, but i say that the first ones to die were primarily those animals that were in the floodplain of the dnieper near the immediate vicinity of the kakhovsky reservoir, and the bird population was very seriously affected in the coastal plains, a lot of them have already given birth to a baby, this is the period when baby birds are born and the population of valuable birds that lived on the islands in the kakhov reservoir in the coastal strip around reservoirs and in the floodplain of the dnieper, they usually lost this generation because

adult birds could rise on the wings, but the chicks. - these are wild boars, hares and foxes, that is, all the animals that lived on this territory in the same nizhny dniester park and they also died, unfortunately, and this is a terrible crime against living creatures that definitely could not save themselves, as for fish then e is here the problem lies not only in the fish that were carried away by the water flows downstream along the dnieper, but also the fish that was higher up the dnieper near the moscow dam, and there

, again, a very rapid decrease in the water level took place. where in shallow water under the rays of the sun in warm water spawning had also begun, a lot of fry and we saw these terrible terrible videos and har- and photos about that fish that flutters and sparkles in the sun, it was uh, hundreds of tons of fish that died literally very in short time and this is also a terrible blow to fish stocks , because the kakhov sea is a huge number, well, diversity of up to 4, more than 40 species of different fish live in the kakhov reservoir, and a significant part, no less than a third of the fish, died, and again, the death of the fry led to the impact to the next generations, thank you very much for this conversation, tetyana tymochko, the head of the all-ukrainian environmental league, was with us on a direct

video link and presented, in particular, her concept, her vision, or rather, i think this is the vision of the all-ukrainian environmental league what should be the future without the kakhovsky reservoir in the south of ukraine, and i hope that in the discussions about what to do after the kakhovsky aggression did not occur , the opinions of not only energy experts, but also the opinions and scientists, the opinions of colleagues are taken into account. what is there to say? and what is the contribution to the future restoration of ukraine and possible rethinking in principle of the potential of the southern ukrainian regions, which now wants at such a price and because of the 16th large-scale disaster, but there is an opportunity to make an undermining the russians have caused an ecological and man-made disaster at the kakhovsky hydroelectric power station, which will affect the ukrainian and world economy

for decades. already, several hundred species of animals and plants are under threat of destruction , not to mention the damage to the soil and forest areas. do not reorient themselves because the world markets orientated instantly, wheat prices jumped by 3%. how the destruction of the kakhov reservoir will change the landscape and climate of the ukrainian south and what other environmental , economic and humanitarian challenges ukraine has already faced and will face. marina asmolova knows the scale of environmental destruction , it is colossal, the largest man-made ecological disaster in europe after the accident

at the chernobyl nuclear power plant, ready to be infected by terrorist terrorists that led to a large-scale uncontrolled spill of water from the kakhovsky reservoir flooded according to preliminary estimates of 10,000 hectares of land, the cupants blew up the machine of the station hall and destroyed its dam the station is not subject to restoration the station is completely destroyed undermining the dam of turbines and generators, russian terrorists carried out from the middle, according to the gur, the rasists mined the dam from four in april, the facts of the movement of explosives , respectively, and the techniques of the rasists for carrying out a controlled remote explosion, such facts and evidence are definitely in part of the southern regions and in the temporarily occupied crimea, at least four dnipropetrovsk, kherson, zaporizhzhya and partly mykolaiv regions will suffer great damage

from the disappearance of the reservoir, drinking water supply will be affected after the flood, drought will come in in dnipropetrovsk region and kherson region, the authorities have already introduced strict restrictions on the use of water and called for stockpiling. it will be impossible to grow vegetables and technical crops. the kakhovsky region, where the climatic conditions were most favorable for the harvest, will be destroyed . cheap vegetables and fruits from the south should be forgotten even after breeding vegetables. there will simply be it is impossible because vegetables are that culture that requires a very large number of moves in the form of irrigation, and growing them without water will be unrealistic two or three

it will take years to restore irrigation, epidemiologists are already warning about the risks of disease outbreaks that are the consequences of flooding, flooding of landfills, and the mass death of animals and fish can lead to the activation of infectious agents, and the fixation is possible already this week. the longest incubation period there is 45 days, but here we have viral gastroenteritis on the second and third day, after uh, two weeks and three, it turned into salmonellosis because of finding, in order not to get infected, you have to follow the rules use only safe water. it must be treated. there are several ways . the most well-known and accessible one is boiling, but you can use, for example, water treated with special tablets . the scale of the disaster will be understood later. the chemicals

that were in the fields, these are gas stations that are flooded, that is, serious chemical and bacteriological pollution, now because these are the bodies of dead animals, they are also fish, 1,000 tons of fish have already been exposed, in order to normalize everything, a new station and its construction will be needed only according to their calculations it will cost a billion dollars marina smolova vlada tsymbalenko we are ukraine marathon the only news contact us ivan nos the chief consultant of the national institute of strategic studies and add economic sciences 4:48 is already ticking but we continue our work for you good night to you almost already good morning, good night , tv viewers, i just wanted to talk with you about the economic consequences of the explosion of the kakhovka hpp dam, the disappearance of the kakhovka reservoir and everything related to the terrible

terrorist act committed by the russian federation, in your opinion, what are the primary medium-term and long-term economic consequences of this act of terrorism for ukraine? well, really, i agree with these figures that were on the air two times that ukraine lost at least 10,000 hectares of agricultural land, that is, where we could grow our products and continue to export it, and about three days ago there was a discussion on the dubai tv channel sharks by a representative of the un about the fact that this terrorist art was made by russia undermining the dam, among other things, creates a threat to global food security, that is, at least this was a discussion with representatives of the gulf region, and it was they who said that they are now very fruitfully

monitoring this situation. and north africa. they will not be able to get a sufficient amount of food products that will be grown in the country and then ukraine will supply them to their markets thanks to the implementation of the black sea grain initiative and other through the supply of goods, that is, now this situation of influence on the amount of food available in the world, it is being studied by many organizations and it is definitely an influence on the export revenues of ukraine, because ukraine is a fairly significant player in the world on the food market, and ukraine received enough funds from this, and unfortunately, ukraine in the near future, he will lose the opportunity to earn money on the arable land of the region that was flooded by ivan. and what can we expect on the food market of ukraine for another price increase

, what will happen to this year's harvest in general and what prices will we see in the fall, and ukraine did not have countries. we have other rural properties and the nsc, i cannot immediately say that this will have a significant impact on the ukrainian market in general, let's say the alsin market, and on the number of goods on our market, especially considering that among a significant part of the flooded lands is located on the territory that is not yet controlled by ukraine. and therefore, unfortunately, we would not be able to get them anyway, at least in the near future, although you know the period when, with various data, ukraine is preparing for a counteroffensive is not excluded, that this territory will return to our control there in two months, but for now let's live like this, we live in the present day, so it's hard to say now when we will restore control , however, part of the lands under the control of ukraine that suffered the loss of this flooding

in relations to let's say other control ukrainian territory, it is relatively insignificant , therefore, to say that this will significantly affect food prices in ukraine i cannot yet. and if the situation with unemployment with the economic potential of the regions that are under heavy water today as a whole, that is, if we look at the situation in perspective, you said that a lot of agriculture will be threatened, and it is quite obvious that they will be flooded and unsuitable for working on them, but we are already talking about a large number of people who, in fact, and uh, they made a living with it and it was their main type of activity. yes, there are already many zaporizhzhia steamboats, which also need water for their work, of course, that is, in this

context, the losses can be significant, the only thing is after all, it is desirable to wait for a full analysis, because so far i have not come across clear figures as far as how many people are said to be in captivity, how many people have finally lost their jobs, because after all, in certain regions that are less flooded , maybe there is a better variation on the restoration of production. and this applies by the way, this is really the nikopol district. that is, everyone who was a-a along the water line, let's say so where, on the contrary, there was a decrease . that is, we are talking about what was flooded. plus, we should forget that due to the decrease in the water level, the channel that supplied water to the crimea practically stopped, but the regions that

were struggling with it received water from this channel. that is, there will also be the only question that after, let's say , the restoration of control, and as far as i have read statements of the relevant authorities, the dam will still be rebuilt. that is, it will actually be rebuilt and this will contribute to normalization , but it is years, not a short period of time , so there is a real threat that a significant number of jobs, at least in the field and agriculture and partly in the industrial spheres that have received water, they may be lost . although as for industry, this is to a lesser extent, because i still think that the level there will recover sooner , but agriculture is a really big problem. what to do with these regions, return them to normal economic life as soon as possible, and how will this affect

logistics and infrastructure, because i read that the dnipro will cease to exist below zaporizhzhia navigable for a certain time, well, you know. now it can’t be with a navigable period of military operations, that is, it will be necessary to analyze the period of restoring ukraine’s control over all the left banks of the dnieper and but really for a certain period of time it will cease to be, but as far as they read analytical evaluations, well, again, this will not be a long period, that is, maybe two or three years, but it is unlikely to be more, and in the future , the situation with the same-class region will recover little by little. and how, in your opinion, will this affect the situation in the economy our the country as a whole, well, see, as i said before, this is not the only region

in our economy in the field of agriculture, therefore, accordingly, its impact will not be as significant. er, to influence the economy of ukraine in future years, precisely because it will be necessary to reorient certain industries and, most importantly, to find an opportunity for the people who are there to find themselves in this world, as they say, that is , some enterprises may be created, although again, this requires an investment of time and there will be a certain plan. but again, if we are talking about the whole country, then there will not be the same dramatic impact here. it is a certain local sentence. thank you for joining our broadcast and talking about the economic potential. the consequences of blowing up the dam

of the kakhovskaya hpp ivan uz, the chief consultant of the national institute of strategic studies, candidate of economic sciences, was with us on a direct video link , you know when i hear about the discussion of some theses on russian propaganda, in particular, but a why did they blow up the kakhova hpp, their defenses were also flooded and crimea was left without water, just listen, just think about the potentially expected consequences for the environment and for people, just for their property, for our economy, for everything that we will decide decades after that as you know, there are no more russian invaders from our territory and there is some line of defense on the left bank from which, based on what we discussed here in this studio with our experts, they were not preparing to seize anything there and so on, they just sat and just compare the consequences and i think it is absolutely clear that for the terrorists it will be a priority in the case of the choice

they faced and in the end, which they made, it is probably clear to everyone that it is not worth it for ukraine and it is obvious that we see how many people suffered how much grief how much animals and fish died. in fact, it is very difficult and we know who is to blame . next, we will talk about the control of money transfers . the news about the nbu's monitoring of card payments was quite frightening and in some places also outraged ukrainians. they say that every bank from now on will report on the movement of funds on the accounts where he paid off on the internet and where he transferred the funds, what actually happened and is it worth worrying about transferring money from card to card anna brikova will tell relatives and friends chaos panic from calls to give up cards for several days in which network intimidation has begun while you were resting, the banks will report to the nbu about the card payments of their customers, about

any movement of funds in your accounts , the reason is allegedly a letter from the nbu, saying that from the fifth of june, every monday, all ukrainian banks must transmit information about non-cash payments by all customers with data and regardless of the amount, both about customer payments on the internet and about all transfers between physical entities and companies, but only the information , as it turned out, does not correspond to the reality of the request, the data does not provide for the collection of information about personal data of individuals national bank of for the purpose of strengthening supervision, starting from december 2022, on a periodic basis , the acquirer will receive generalized information from the acquiring banks exclusively regarding the subjects of economic activity of the services of legal entities that use the services of banks for e-commerce, i.e. lawyers, was published with a distorted interpretation by one of the under-action publications . now the nbu clarifies and uses this information exclusively for supervisory purposes, because the analysis of such information makes it possible to identify gaps where

e-commerce helps to serve the shadow market, in particular the illegal the gambling business is all the so-called internal kitchen, says the expert, and as for the fears of ordinary citizens before possible monitoring, we are with you anyway constantly using the services of the bank, we are monitored financial monitoring up to 30,000 per month transactions are not subject to monitoring in any way from 30 to 40 to 400,000 this is selective monitoring in the event that the transactions are e-e unusual and from 400,000 and above mandatory monitoring and precisely the financial monitoring service can indeed block the card and ask about the source of funds, but only if there is suspicion