[000:00:00;00] to a reservoir of not such a volume , of course, it was blown up. well, this proves once again that this is the practice used by the russian occupiers . if there is a lot , i would like to emphasize once again that it is impossible to do it with a missile strike, because in order to destroy such a large-scale destruction, to cause, as happened on kakhovka, it is necessary to lay explosives, and quite a lot, it is hundreds of kg of explosives, it project calculations that kakhovskaya has withstood a nuclear attack, therefore, it is external to destroy it like that, it is not so simple . well, considering that today, well, let's say that any rockets do not reach our object

, it works perfectly in our country, but its bombs, well, you understand what should it be at all, let's say, should the plane fly over the object and work, let's say the materials about it , well, it's unrealistic today, that is , the kakhovskaya hpp was designed for a nuclear explosion, well, that is, under the probability of a nuclear movement , such mining, which and which took place, that's not one day's work it's dozens of days to do it, plan it, you need to know the places, how much is it usually, pyrotechnics in theirs, let's say, they consulted and the project, the institutes that design hydroelectric structures, and the workers themselves, the engineers of the hydroelectric power station , the russian military, name the crimean titan chemical plant near armyansk that in

the north of the occupied crimea , explosives are planted on the factory and adjacent territory, and the workshops of the enterprise are mined . according to the information of the group, its main intelligence department is informed about this due to the destruction of the kakhovka hpp and as a result the lack of water in the north crimean canal, the production processes at the crimean titan plant are literally disrupted to a critical level, and the occupation authorities of crimea consider it impossible to resume work in the minimum proper mode, the department adds, well , in general, it is already known about ten people who died due to the destruction dams of the kakhovka hydroelectric power plant 42 people are considered missing, seven of them are children such data was voiced by the head of the ministry of internal affairs klymenko and added that as of now almost fifty inhabitants points remain flooded, and most of them are in the territory controlled by ukraine. there is also information about the dead in the occupied territory on the left bank. but

as of now, the ministry of internal affairs does not have accurate data. i'll see you on the air tomorrow, thank you for your trust and let's keep the fungus, now it's not a problem in terbifoot, death for the fungus is worried about the profoot, the legs are happy with the fungus of the hands of the exclusive plantain, north macedonia, ukraine on megogo, will it work? the long-awaited coach with the first test in the selection of euro-2024 - june 16 at 21:45 cheer for the main team of the country on megogo there are moments when the body quickly loses fluid, which can lead to dehydration when, of course, there is not enough water jereo

i save zreo water for for special medical purposes, there are 20% discounts on kombigrip hot-sip in podorozhnyk pharmacies for you and savings so that ukrainians don’t think about anything, no matter what they talk about, war, war, and our victory is only on espresso from monday to on sunday, completely different spheres of human activity, sports, health, politics, the return of crimea, military analysis of the ninth presenters, journalists, experts, opinion leaders in real time about the most current events through the prism of war in author's projects on espresso , vasyl's big broadcast in winter, two hours of airtime , two hours of your time two hours to learn about the war and what the world is like 2 hours to keep abreast of economic news and new

sports two hours in the company of favorite presenters presenters who have become familiar to many also distinguished guests of the studio, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening, nay espresso, andriy yanitskyi keeps the economy under control , yes, it's about economic news on the espresso channel, but it's not about dry numbers and clear terms, it's about the economy, it's about the ability to analyze predict and benefit from what the exchange rates of salaries and pensions will be and how product prices will change information about everything that affects our wallet and informed means armed

watch the economy news project with andriy yanitsky on weekdays at 8:10 on espresso we are special forces of the sbu experts in destroying the enemies of ukraine we know pavlo and complex special operations for the offensive we need the best join the center of special operations and the sbu get high-quality training get modern weapons and combat experience step by step shot with shot attack with attack together we will liberate ukraine special operations center and the sbu engrave your name on the pages of victory tv channels espresso i - yuriy fizer and monday

and this means that at about this time the program world during the war is broadcast. when my guests and i discuss the most important things that happened in the world, obviously with reference to ukraine, during the past week, and we try to look into the week that is ahead of us in order to be in at least we are ready for what we can expect, so for some of you, this is an unusual time for our program to air, we have changed this time since last monday, and this is approximately how we will always be on the air now, so everyone who watches the world at war who loves the world at war and we love you all too please remember now we go on the air from about 13:00 well maybe until 13:10 depending on how it will be well follow the broadcast in one word well and today there is nothing new , i will have some professional guests with whom i will talk professionally about what i would like to talk about, the questions that arose during the past week and may arise during the week that is ahead of us well

, how always all of you who watch us in youtube, please remember us, the broadcast is on two channels, the general espresso channel and the channel i am about youtube , on the channel that was created specifically for the sweet program during the war, so on this channel we ask you to answer questions every week, and today's is no exception this time the question sounds like this: russia should stand trial for its crimes, three options for answers , nothing surprising, immediately after the end of the war , and your option. well, it is obvious why i asked you this question, of course, because of what on the sixth of last week, they blew up the hopka dam, the dam at the kakhovsky hydroelectric station, and if you add to that all the other crimes that the russians

committed during this invasion of ukraine, which began on february 24 of last year, this issue is just as urgent. when should she appear before the court for her crimes, and now i want to tell you that now we are being watched on a special youtube channel that was created for the world during the war 570 people i thank you all for joining and we already have answers to the questions of 93 people gave their answers immediately, russia should answer for its crimes, 83% of viewers believe that after the war, 14% of viewers and 3% of viewers have their own opinion, but their opinion can be read in the comments or already at the end when the program is published by youtube and you will be able to see everything watch well, so do i. thank you to all those who joined us on the air of the espresso tv channel, at

least where it was not turned off from the networks. thank you too. well, if our guest already has this question for my charming host, it suggests that i can start now today's broadcast so silvestra nosenko, analyst of the center for economic recovery and ukraine, sylvester, i congratulate you. thank you for joining. glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes . congratulations to the studio. thank you for the invitation, mr. sergey. i invited you only because you are the last week. facebook is your telegram and you wrote a lot about the un. it is about the un that i really want to talk to you .

you know, now everyone is listening, obviously, after such a kind of reaction, i would say a weak reaction, i don't know a weak reaction , i don't know inaction, i don't know, i obviously mean the reaction to what the rashists did in novaya kakhovka, so let's go first mr. sylvester. i will invite ivan and our audience to listen that after it seems the day after or maybe the second day after a-and the same after the explosion of the kakhovka dam said the secretary general of the united nations antonio guterreich let's listen salon tdalife organization the united nations does not have access to independent information about the circumstances that led to the destruction of the kakhova hydroelectric dam, but one thing is clear. this is another devastating consequence of the russian invasion of ukraine. today's tragedy is another example of the terrible price of war for people. the floodgates of suffering have been overflowing for more than a year. this must stop . attacks on civilians and critical civilian infrastructure

must stop we must act to ensure accountability and respect for international humanitarian law above all i i call for a just peace in accordance with the statute of the united nations organization, international law, the games of the un general assembly, that is, these seem to be standard un comments. well , before i ask you a question, let's listen to a quote from the kystoni prime minister, who is also a terrorist . the russian state has now turned water into a weapon destroying the kakhov dam is a war crime affecting countless civilians and leading to ecocide and mass destruction we must

to stop this cycle of aggression by helping ukraine to win and ensuring russia's full responsibility, well, mr. sylvester, look, returning from the second quote, ms. kalash says that we should help ukraine to respond, to respond in such cases , they help more precisely. organizations like the u.n. but in the first quote, well, we don't heard of this aid plus uh, look right after ukraine was left , it managed to do it before russia, they called an emergency meeting of the united nations, but in my opinion, in my vision, we seem to have lost at this meeting, that is, we really needed to speak. we had to speak, but it seems that the votes there were somehow divided 50 to 50. first of all, there was no resolution. second, there were countries that treated us very well. russia did it exactly on the kakhov rake, and plus 50% of those who spoke, in particular, from african countries. they said, well, this is scary, this is scary. well, russia , no, benzene said so. here is my question for you:

an emergency meeting of the un security council on explosives of the kakhovka hydroelectric plant. please tell me what kind of result it was for ukraine . thank you, mr. yury, for the question. when answering it , i would not look through the prism of the classic dephotomy that we love . betrayal. victory . if any crime happens and we are even its witnesses and we know exactly what happened, it still does not cancel the need to hold a court session and announce who is guilty by a court decision, the same happens with international crimes, i.e. so that this does not happen, the international community will always try to conduct everything as objectively as possible, and how cool it is that they were not present there at that moment in order to find out all the circumstances, so it will be

much better for us if the international court of justice or the international the criminal court will conduct an investigation and establish the culprits, and already based on the results of this i will say that russia is guilty and it must compensate for the damage in ukraine , of course, that is the position of estonia. well, you have to understand that it is categorically in our favor, but this is a political position. an independent force is just the sum of all the positions of all the countries of the world. i cannot take such a position. that is, what the head of the un says and what the head of a country from among those countries that support ukraine says are slightly different things. well, but still the result of this emergency meeting of the council the un, was it for ukraine, because look at the question that i also wanted to ask you, but a little later , but since i already got caught up in it, there is a meeting of the un security council, after which

resolutions are adopted after this meeting of the security council there was no resolution, that is, what we see, we just see the parties spoke and voiced their position and it seems to me personally , as a citizen of ukraine, it seems that russia at this emergency meeting of the un security council was in a more winning position than we are, it cannot be said that it was in a winning position because no one openly said that ukraine did it. moreover, if you look at the previous words, in particular, the temporary measures imposed by the international court of justice in march of last year , it says that russia should stop those things which are similar in connection with the aggression against ukraine, that is, the whole world will understand, the whole world will recognize that it was russia that committed the aggression, and in the appropriate direction it will be considered as an argument in favor of ukraine, why it was russia that committed it, and of course there the argumentation will be very long to the international court or the international criminal court, there will be very, very many

legal and political issues that we will have to prove, but we cannot say for sure that russia has won. in general, this is the initial stage of consideration of the dispute if the security council does not was able to reach some kind of ladder to invest some kind of final revolution, then this is just the first stage. and by the way, this happens quite often because the consent of nine members of the security council, including five permanent members, is required, and consent has not been observed for quite some time. and accordingly, if it was not possible to resolve this conflict situation within the framework of the russian invasion in this way, then other mechanisms will be involved , international judicial institutions, continuing to ask you questions about the agreement in the security council and why some uh final agreements are not often concluded solution why does the security council not agree, well, again, it is simply the arithmetic mean of the positions of all the states that are part of it, and if you look at when

there was a consensus in the security council, it was in the 40s when the united states had certain positions there after the second world war or the 1990s, when the cold war had just ended and the world was expecting such a general period of peace and prosperity, and again the positions of the united states were very strong now due to the fact that the forces of the united states compared to other countries already not so strong, another stronger state that will help themselves to allow some kind of disagreement because there is no such agreement in the security council, but this is not a reason to dissolve security or not at all. look, you have come to a good answer to the next question that i wanted to ask you. it seems that you wrote it on facebook that the un should not be used and not called for liquidation, you can explain this, of course, i am very puzzled by the posts in some telegram publications, millionaire and where do they write why does this un exist at all and

nothing more, no more arguments and just thousands of comments from viewers i can understand this anger, and it often separates me very much that there are no actions from international organizations that we would really like, but we must understand that all international law is based on the united nations, which we can refer to saying that russia violates it and we have the opportunity to condemn russia for this, that is, if international law is beads from the convention and international agreements, then the organization of the united nations is a thread on which all these beads are strung. for example , the un secretary general is a depository 560 of international conventions and agreements, this is a huge amount of legal material that simply would not have existed if it had not been there. oh, there would not have been the convention on combating the financing of terrorism on the crime of genocide in other conventions against which we stand against russia

. international judicial institutions must also understand that without the un as the universal international organization should simply turn into such a regional fragment where the right of the strong prevailed, that is, the same russia without separate plans would plan in the cis states and no one could somehow er effectively intervene somehow in this to prevent the fact that there were regional fragments exist on its own i turn around in dream states on its own india with the state of south asia on its own africa on its own but look once again i apologize to you that but it seems to me that russia is acting like that and the un is doing nothing now. let's start from 2014, when was the annexation of crimea, when was the invasion of donetsk and luhansk regions, and the un? well, what did he do? this is also a reasonable question. i can

only say that it is not necessary. have illusions about roleon as a structure that can ensure global peace in the whole world well, this idea is, after all, an illusion and a utopia because the world has never had general peace, as an internationalist who has studied international conflicts , i can say that the world has spent 92% of its time in war and thanks to the un, we were able to avoid a world war, we saw two world wars in less than 20 years of the 20th century, and the task of the un has always been not to prevent all wars, but to prevent wars between great powers that can simply destroy the world, taking into account nuclear weapons ion does this successfully. thank god, because regional conflicts cannot be prevented always and in all cases, but prevent them from spilling over to the ball level, where it poses a threat to everyone, this is the task and so

far they are coping with it. well, let's hope that they will help somehow and to us because it seems to me that, well, as a simple consumer , as a citizen of ukraine, not as an international columnist of the espresso tv channel, when i look at what he is doing, i see that he is not doing anything wrong. i will also add in connection with your comment that the un was created for normal states that did not want a repetition of what happened during the second world war and remained so for a long time and why it is now so difficult to oppose russia because it was one of such normal states and the world recognized it because it won of hitler's germany together with the states of the western coalition and it was simply assumed that it is logical that a state that was created in a peaceful system cannot simply take and start pushing out bricks from it

, and russia simply struck one after another the wall of international agreements, the conventions that she herself widely gave , that is, russia will still someday want to return to this family of normal nations. institutions that she now denies and so on, but there will already be a price for this , that is, she will not be able to return, what do you mean, if more specifically, what could this price be, that is , it is purely hypothetical in itself. that at some point something will happen in russia, well, the victory will be for by us obviously, a-and in russia, the power is changing in russia, this is h- hypothetical options, russia breaks into some small particles, but then some one there, muscovy, for example, wants to return to the un, what price does it have to pay for this? that's what you said. of course, you can answer this question by drawing an analogy with croatia , if you remember, yugoslavia

is falling apart. croatia seems to be waging a war for independence . that is, it is not visible in any way, but at the same time croatian generals are committing war crimes and so that croatia can enter the of the european union and a full-fledged member, it had to extradite criminals among croatian generals , it sometimes went hard and with a creak because the nationalists came to power in that period in the 2000s, but in the end, croatia fulfilled all the requirements of the international criminal court, fulfilled the requirements of the international tribunal regarding the former yugoslavia, all criminals. russia has been extradited and successfully joined the european union. one way or another, will it remain as a single state or will it disintegrate? it will all be the same . you will have to be motivated to do it because

that without this, no lifting of sanctions, no restoration of membership in international structures simply will not be clear, here is an interesting analogy , really with croatia, i did not think about it. thanks for what you said about it, well, let's go back to the un and to what you write. you say that liquidation is not an option and reorganization is a good option, it raised the level of justice in the organization because , as we understand, the balance of power that was after the second world war and that is now has changed a lot then the state was much smaller and now such powerful forces are rising like japan, india, germany, brazil, argentina, etc., nigeria, south africa. this is probably the first list that comes to mind. these two states would like to be represented as permanent members of the basic council, but the fact is that , for example, if we exclude russia and replace it with some other responsible

state for example, in india, the question of pakistan will immediately arise, and pakistan and india , er, both have nuclear weapons, and this can again put itself on the threshold of er-e conflict , the same contradictions will be there in nigeria, south africa, brazil and argentina. if let's say japan will enter, ok, i remember there will be complaints about why japan in particular, ah, it just requires a lot of diplomatic work, which is difficult to put in. even now, in some imagination, but it will eventually be carried out . its role. i think that if china and the united states manage to reach some kind of agreement between themselves, what, for example, replace russia with india in some way, and while i will somehow compensate for it, in principle, it will be a compromise option, because india is

definitely an ally there, neither china nor united states and this is such a new balance , i see this as one of the options for getting out of the situation . well, look, if at the initial stage it is just to take and cancel the legal one, then these five permanent members of the soviet security council, and look at canceling the legal one, then there is such an option, and recently the option was offered it seems like luxemburg, it is that now every time a permanent member of the un security council exercises his right of veto, he must explain to the general assembly in front of all the countries of the world why exactly he decided to use it legal, of course, there will not be any legally binding mechanism for its cancellation, but this is something that will add or subtract legitimacy to this or that application of the law of roulette, and this is also a judge because, again, a normal state will want

its decision to have legitimacy to be supported in the world, especially if it is a state with global influence , that's why well, this is an essential thing, well, look again, you say obligations. it won't be. well, okay, well, russia will veto something later at the general assembly. when i have many representatives in the hall, she explains, motivates, there is a vote, they vote, but then, of course, there is no one in the execution of this vote. i agree. yes, it is really a problem, but if you look at how the same general assembly supported the territorial integrity of ukraine in the 14th year and in the 22nd year, we see that there is a significant increase if in the 14th it was 100 states and the others abstained and did not want to express an official position or ties with russia are very important , now it is already 140 plus and from the state i think that this number will grow on the condition that we lead with all of them right

diplomatic work, and are we conducting this correct diplomatic work now , in your opinion, i see very significant steps in this direction. so our honorable minister of foreign affairs, dmytro kuleba, was on a tour of africa, which, unfortunately, was interrupted there due to the again flagrant war crimes of russia. but recently, he made a new visit where he spoke with the leadership of the african union, which is such an analogue of the european union in africa. and there really is this important work being carried out . for example, ukraine understands that africa should be offered to solve not only ukrainian problems problems and to understand the interests of africa in general was proposed by dmytro kuleba. he offered the african union support for ukraine in that the african union received membership in the big 20, and this is a very interesting proposal. i think that if ukraine goes further, for example, it will not only advocate the termination of russia's membership

in the un, but will also advocate specifically for some country to enter instead of russia and build a coalition around it, this will also be an interesting solution, by the way, if we were allowed to talk about africa i was going to ask you this question, but you are pushing me on it. tell me, please. what is your vision of this african initiative of peace settlement, they are called peaceful settlement of the conflict, which in ukraine we call it obviously russian and the end of the russian war. initiatives to consider this african initiative, within the framework of which there will probably be a visit of several african presidents of african states to ukraine and russia this month, it will concern not so much political and economic because it is clear at first the blatant step