[000:00:00;00] special operations carried out by the russian army, the russian general only in part of his own population, to explain, to ridicule and the like is the fashionable word to troll, because it is impossible to reach the hearts and minds of the russians themselves at the moment, it's all the same that i would in 42 someone tried to reach their hearts the nazis it didn't work carthage must be destroyed and only then when it is completely destroyed at least 60 years of comprehensive sanitation cleaning denial until the last bearer dies sooner i don't have there is no optimism that a conversation is possible with them, even if tomorrow putin hangs himself from a lantern and takes his place. massive internalism must be killed in the end, if this does not happen, they will take up again after a while, against the background of the fact that vladimir putin says that we have no mobilization and no

such a resource that we could collect for the war with ukraine is about the fact that graduates of russian military universities are being prepared to be sent to war in ukraine after training, personal personnel are planned transfer to the temporarily occupied territories of ukraine and we are talking about all the graduates of the higher military educational institutions of the russian federation, this information shows that the number of people with whom putin tried to conquer and keep the ukrainian territory under his control, this number has already been exhausted, i.e. putin was not ready for such a war, and how quickly can he come to his senses and find those resources that he was not ready for at the beginning of the war, well, we

are talking about providing troops, we are talking about equipment, we are talking about the necessary number of people who can administer there in the occupied territories and how to ensure order there, how much is the ratio of what they planned , what they have now and what they need, well, conditionally speaking, tomorrow, the fact that they did not have a plan for the bc obviously, they were firmly convinced that they would be able to eliminate ukrainian statehood . literally in a week, this is once again an indicator of how far they are from reality. with the third contingent, the first contingent, the really well-prepared, high-quality one, was in the range of 200,000, the second in last year was extended. and now

, according to the principle of replacement, they do not have any separate two-hundred-strong army in the range of up to 20-22 thousand per month. they give some elementary weapons and throw them into battle , do they have quality weapons anymore and will not be? the maximum they can earn for tanks is up to 20 machines and 90 per month, understanding that we have already destroyed almost 4,000 of these tanks on the march at the beginning the war was 3,400, so they will continue to manufacture them for several decades, this also applies to other categories of weapons but at the same time, repeatedly, not once , twice, or three times, he repeated several to ten times that we have hundreds of thousands of kalashnikov rifles, hundreds of thousands must get ppsh and pps weapons the second world war and they will give one ppsh in their hands, one round drum with 71 cartridges, they will put on an okupaika and give a handful of crackers to the kirzaks. and maybe they won’t give an mpl-50, what a small sapper shovel, and

they will die for putin’s family. and here is an important detail. this is is of a very brilliant special operation that you touched the drinking fountain of the trenches, this is the fact that no one was captured, this was very impressive. yes, we mowed them down there, but no one raised their hands, and this is the detail that we need to pay attention to and understand that in a psychological sense, let me be very poorly motivated and they don't want to fight, but they still die. thank you, sir, who are you looking for again ? it was petro chernyk, a colonel of the armed forces of ukraine in the reserve, a military expert, friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel , as well as on our social networks and on on the youtube platform for those who are currently watching us on youtube and facebook, please like this video so that it is promoted in the trends of youtube and facebook . subscribe to our social networks. well , become a sponsor of our youtube channel. now you will see a qr-code by clicking on which you you can find detailed information on how to join the prestigious club of sponsors

of the espresso youtube channel, also read our news on the espresso tv website, we work for you 24 hours a day, seven days a week for more prompt information from ukraine and the world also the frontline chronicle, everything is on our espresso tv website, we will be grateful to you for any help and support. i want to introduce one more of our guests today - this is oleksandr musienko, a military expert and political expert, e.e., the head of the center for military and legal research, mr. oleksandr good evening and i congratulate you. good evening. i congratulate you. let's start with biden's statements, because now the world is actively discussing his phrase that the threat of putin's use of nuclear weapons is

a reality, and biden said this publicly. on saturday, he called putin 's statements about the placement of the first units of tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus absolutely irresponsible. is the reaction of the president of the united states of america sufficient both to the placement and to putin's threats, despite the fact that for two days at the st. petersburg international economic forum, putin thundered his weapons and biden personally tried to prove something to the united states of america. well, first of all, this statement is made, i think, by the president of the united states deliberately on the eve of the very sinking that he has i would like to remind you that one of the issues, not even one, will be two or three issues on the agenda , which will relate to the strengthening of security in europe against the background of russian aggression, support for the eastern flank of nato and the future of ukraine , that is, two points, this is support for ukraine plus

a solution to the issue of statements where the promised membership for our country should be after the cessation of hostilities, so i think that this is being done deliberately and in the context of the exercises that nato is currently conducting in europe. i want to remind you that in germany there was over the baltic sea over the mur and over the black sea, exercises involving more than 250 aircraft are also being conducted. these are now the largest aviation exercises in the history of nato using aviation and one more event without which this would all be incomplete. these actions of russia are really from the transfer or plans to transfer nuclear weapons to belarus. is also a threat, and putin deliberately chose the date with lukashenka, this is also deliberately done on the eve of the nato summit, including themselves, which freedom will come if, in principle, it is not

far from the places where they are planning to stockpile and deploy the same nuclear weapons. therefore, i think that the position of the united states is to once again draw attention to this event, to shake those who perhaps still pessimistically look at the threats and say that there are threats from russia, so let's coordinate efforts to unite to counter this now we come to that part of your question and how to counter it in my opinion some moments were already yesterday well what i mean do you remember several times a few weeks ago even earlier lukashenko, then the minister of defense of russia, why is putin here? they talked about the fact that the principles of uh, they have already changed or are changing the means of delivery of these weapons, i.e. modernized planes, the raising of nuclear warheads and complexes, and chanting, respectively

, i think that this was already a signal to all good people if something were to happen to these complexes and these weapons, then a serious dilemma would arise and the question would be , there are no means of delivery. the problem would have disappeared, but it was omitted. then there were statements. i want to remind the president of poland that he once gave an interview to one of the polish publications and said that then it is possible for the united states to move american nuclear weapons to poland nuclear sharing, what is called it will be a guarantor of deterrence, and in some ways he is right, because if russia violates the balance that was maintained at the end of the cold war, and after , as we know, ukraine also disarmed, not

only that, but nato must also counter it. well, actually saying, i think that's why they are making relevant statements, and then we will wait for a reaction. i think that before the nato summit, first of all, there will be an escalation from the russian side in one way or another , we will see. lukashenko has already started to heat up this situation when he said that belarus is ready to use nuclear weapons further i think putin will talk about it, maybe not personally, but his various propagandists are there, these are all the slanderers who are already around him , such as karaganov and experts, others express themselves in them, well, in them, it means what we are there to talk about it to push well, actually speaking, this is right before the nato summit, at the nato summit certain decisions should be made, i think after the consultation. of a single area of ​​european air and missile defense over ukraine is a german idea, they

are actively promoting it now. and what does this mean? it means that ukraine should receive not only air defense equipment such as the patriot, but also equipment for greater for today let them be located even on the border of poland with ukraine, they will cover a large enough territory over the ukrainian state as well and it will be an integrated system of unified monitoring of threats and means of air defense, and even more so when we have already received the patriots and the most advanced air defense complexes which are currently in the west and are being used, this is real . this is how i see why president biden made this statement right now. he did at the saint-petersburg international economic forum, it was about the fact that the west wants a strategic

defeat for russia, and ukraine, they say , the west wants military equipment, let's see what he said . eh, so that eh russia suffered, as they say, eh, defeats, eh, on the battlefield , a strategic one, at which he lived, they do everything that is in their power for this. beautiful video, eh , soon ukraine will stop using its own equipment at all, there is nothing left. everything they don't fight for and everything they use is excused. well, you don't fight for so long. and our defense industry is expanding and the last afternoon we

have increased the production of everything by 2.70 times. production wars in the last hour, a country that can only produce weapons, a country that can only produce death, this is about the russian federation , oleksandr, are these comparisons correct or correct? by the leaders of the western world, the united states of america, great britain, germany, france and other members of the north atlantic alliance, is putin taking on too much when he says that russia is fighting against the collective west ? possibilities, it is clear that back in 2015, when the first sanctions were introduced against the russian

defense industry after the annexation of crimea by russia, they decided that they needed to replace more than 800 elements from 820 or 825 import substitution, that is, what they imported from abroad, what they imported in russia and they needed to produce in russia, they replaced it for about 30 years and then stopped publishing the statistics they have on import substitution, it is no longer publicly available, this is what russia in general , it was extremely integrated into the world arms markets, and was partly, unfortunately , due to certain schemes for circumventing sanctions, gray and black schemes, it is still trying to buy and , unfortunately, there are reasons to believe that it is buying certain elements that are necessary in particular for production, but still they are not the same scale

as they were before the sanctions, but according to what putin says about what they built up, so what did they build up, they don’t produce chips, they don’t produce a processor, they couldn’t do anything in order to achieve and advance in this, they bought it all, that is, in many ways, the russian weapons he is talking about consisted of foreign components and components, they are not 100% weapons, they are produced in russia, and this is also another element to what he is saying what ukraine imports from the outside, now the second question concerns ukraine , and, well, first of all, i have to say that here it is really simple to complete the finalization, and russia does not have such technological and innovative opportunities to compete in this sense of the west, to compete in iron , to compete in the number of cartridges, to compete in the number of there armor is another question to compete with the newest types of weapons no, because as you can see, they even import shaheeds

, but i would like to ask putin a question, so what are you relying on, what are you relying on now , shaheeds, and many shaheeds are produced in iran why for striking and as for ukraine, by the way, i can literally answer now, there is fresh news that ukroboronprom has conducted a successful test of a ukrainian drone with a range of 1000 km . yes, this is important news, moreover, there are developments in ukraine, i say this as an expert of one on the initiative of the ministry of defense, numbers and nsdc, which evaluates projects and developments, startups, of which there are a lot of them. believe me, they are financed both by the state and by volunteers and by private developers. third, who said that it is possible to be fully militarized only at the expense of internal resources, no state in the world today, even the united states, they are not 100% independent in the field

of weapons production, they cooperate with israeli companies, with french, with german, with norwegian, the nasoms system for air defense that we use , etc., that is, and but they produce weapons that are then used jointly because you understand, i will say that no one approaches the militarization of ukraine as much as putin does with full-scale aggression. because, you know, if incomplete aggression, we would not talk about the fact that f16 will appear by the end of this year or at the beginning of next year, and we could talk about the fact that in 16 they would not appear in ukraine earlier than 2030, i am not talking about patriots and others systems well, it's true because yesterday pisco said that they say one of the functions and one goal of the special military operation has been achieved is the demilitarization of ukraine . this is very funny because in fact the ukrainian

army has completely rearmed and we are the newest models and models of the north atlantic alliance participants of the north atlantic alliance, and one of the conditions already for joining nato is the first arming of the army on models and the transition to nato standards. at the same time, on june 19 , anthony blinke flew to china to the secretary of state of the united states of america. this is the first visit of this level in recent years. 5 years and the first visit of such a high level during the presidency of joseph biden, the relationship between washington and beijing is not easy, and blinky usually talked about the lethal weapons that beijing could provide, but as blinking insists

does not provide russia, let's hear what the secretary of state of the united states of america said after his visit to beijing regarding the supply of lethal weapons to russia for use in ukraine, we and other countries received an assurance from china that it does not and will not provide lethal assistance to russia for use in ukraine, we appreciate it and we have not seen any evidence that contradicts this, but we are concerned that chinese companies may be providing technologies that russia can use to advance the invasion of ukraine, and we have asked the chinese government very pay close attention to this matter joseph biden praised the results of blinka's visit to beijing quite highly and now it is expected that a meeting between xi jinping and joseph biden will take place, which also shows that china and the united states of america are conducting this difficult dialogue for china is also difficult for the united states america is not easy. and for russia, this dialogue between washington and beijing, what does it mean? what kind of signal is

putin, you know, it was necessary to monitor some russian changes against the background of this visit to see how many fakes they wrote about what blinkin means that they didn't accept him there and that's not how he met and not there, and china is sending some kind of signals, that is, they wanted to demonstrate that it seems to mean the humiliation of the united states. well, not at all , that is, if it hadn't been there, this visit demonstrates that for china it is important to the united states and it is really important, and this is a signal to russia that, well, first of all, sledinting is meeting with representatives of the united states, in this case with the secretary of state, and maybe he will meet with president biden, and before that he met during the summit

20-somethings at the ball, where did they have contacts, i.e. the opinion? after all, contacts are important. you are direct, just as in russia , not everything is like that. if they wanted to, on the other hand , we understand that this probably does not mean what. china will now take the position of the west in everything, and this must also be understood , that is, they started before the consultation, resumed the dialogue here, this visit is important from the point of view of the fact that the russian media tried to manipulate fakes to spread that after this incident with bullets that happened in february with these aerostats, which time they blamed that they were launched when they were from china or chinese production and then the secretary of state of the usa blinken canceled his visit. so russia is important. she showed in such a way that no dialogue will be restored. the dialogue is being restored and established and a meeting at the highest level will be possible . i would say that this is probably the biggest result of this meeting, one of the biggest results of the meeting that

will continue to brew because let's say it is so obvious that some controversial points are on today they remain in the economic and political security plane, but please note that another interesting visit is taking place in the near future, this is the visit of the prime minister of india modi to the united states, and this is a very interesting thing, because one of the goals of this visit is the conclusion of contracts for tens of billions of dollars in the defense sector between india and the united states, the purpose of which, after all, the us position is clear here is actually to pull india away from this , depending on russia, because india still actually purchases 50-60 percent weapons from russia for its needs, and they have very serious military-technical cooperation - it is almost the largest partner. by the way, in the field

of e-e in the sale of e-e weapons in asia and for russia , so i would still pay attention to it there eh, i think certain solutions can also be interesting. that means that from a certain point of view , the usa is working to, let's say, reduce the cooperation and the level of cooperation between the countries of asia, especially such as china and india and others with russia, this is very it is important, however , to understand that this positive is possible here the dynamics will not be so fast. unfortunately, as much as we would like, it is not so. it is still as simple as it may seem in relations between the united states and china. another piece of news. this day, june 29 , at the request of russia, the un security council convenes a meeting regarding the western arms supply to ukraine and about this was reported by the first deputy permanent

representative of the russian federation, mr. dmytro polyanskyi. well, it must be said that a month ago , the russian federation already initiated a meeting of the un security council to condemn the supply of weapons to ukraine, the office of the president of ukraine then advised according to you, russia will use the united nations less, how long and how long will russia be able to use the united nations organization, taking into account the fact that a similar situation or a somewhat similar situation was with the left nation and the soviet union tried to use the leagues, but the league of nations still excluded the soviet union for the attack on finland in 1939, could it happen that the un can also exclude the zone or suspend russia's membership there, at least in the un security council , since russia is an aggressor country and violates

absolutely all international norms, although the same pu tin told the leaders of african countries that everything he does corresponds to the letter of the united nations charter. well, only in the united nations charter you will not find a justification for aggressive war anywhere, and nowhere will you find a justification for war except for the right to self-defense. in the case of a sheep or aggression about what ukraine is doing, ukraine is doing according to the statute, russia , i think, has never once stated anywhere that someone would attack her and no one attacked her, and the answers are carried out in general like this the so-called special military operation, which is generally not defined in international law. therefore, what is putin appealing to as a lawyer, having at his side such a great lawyer as a candidate of legal sciences, bears and i don’t know, but definitely not to the norm of international law regarding the exclusion

russia, you know, i rather believe that the un will somehow be re-founded in one form or another as a result of this war than that russia will lose the right to vote, because it is possible to deprive russia of the right to vote, according to a precedent according to which the right to vote is actually passed from taiwan passed to mainland china this was at one time , but at that time the delegation was simply deprived of its vote, and the other delegations were given their vote. another question is what can be pressed and appealed to is that russia actually appropriated the status of the legal successor of the entire ussr and was informed immediately about this is the un literally at the moment of making this decision, and they were actually accepted by a letter from and signed by yeltsin immediately into the soviet union, and the changes in the statute were not even indicated because the soviet union was listed there

, so this right is an illegal cancellation but this can lead to consequences and inconvenient questions for those members of the un secretariat, for those representatives who at that time made relevant decisions, and it is concluded that russia has arbitrarily appropriated these powers, so i think that it is worth raising the issue of the re-establishment of we have the opportunity for this, i have spoken about it repeatedly er, the washington treaty, the washington declaration and the actual registration of the states against the anti-hitler axis when they gathered and decided and decided that it was necessary to fight hitler, and the second decision, which is about what will be adopted, is the declaration of the united

nations, which is probably, well, in fact, for the future laid the foundations for u- here is something like that. i think it would be useful for us to conduct it, maybe it could be the rammstein format, which is framed as an anti-russian or anti-putin coalition, in this case, other formats are possible, but there should be two things, first of all, about that the restoration of peace in europe at least and that in the world is impossible without victory over russia today and the second is what should happen at least the reform of the un and at the most the re-establishment of this organization is at the end of the war this is always a reason for change here of these paradigms because similar decisions have always been made based on the results of wars and resolutions, so i think that here too we should not delay because i don't see any other way, i don't see it today

... what kind of fire let's say they are talking about russia. and yes, russia is an aggressor. yes, it did wrong . yes , it violates international law. and russia's participation in the un and the soviet union, because the aggressor country should not influence the decisions of the international organization, affect the security of those countries or touch the security issues of other countries if it violates these norms if it violates all written and unwritten rules of this world , oleksandr thank you for the conversation, it was oleksandr musienko, the head of the center for military legal studies, friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel , as well as on our social networks and on the youtube platform. if you are watching us now on youtube or facebook, put any

please like this video, subscribe to our social networks, and also join our website espresso tv, we are working for you 24 hours a day, seven days a week for the most up-to-date news from ukraine and the world and front chronicle thank you for the next program take care of yourself and your loved ones goodbye this is bbc ukraine my name is hryhoriy zhigalov today we have a unique view of british journalists on how the counteroffensive is developing bbc war correspondent quentin somer spent several days at the location of the 68th separate hunting brigade the armed forces of ukraine on the outskirts of the village of blagodatne recently liberated by ukrainian troops. at this time, its forces tried to take control of the territory to the east, while the troops in general continue to conduct reconnaissance by combat and most of the ukrainian forces are in