[000:00:00;00] there, everyone is saying that recently india, which buys oil in russia in millions of colors a day, and china, which today buys russian oil and more than it bought an hour ago, saudi oil, that is, the purchase of oil has increased by 20 times, something crazy number and that's why everyone understands what exactly these two countries are, but in time , only not india but china can put real pressure on a-a russia and that's why the visit of the same french president macron to china two months ago shows that european leaders are trying to explain to the chinese leader, their national leader, so we call him that it is in the interests of china to stop russia from withdrawing its troops from ukraine, because if this war continues, it will also cause damage to the national and economic interests

of china, so european leaders are trying to use all their arguments and all their it is possible to convince china to stop providing financial and economic assistance to russia, even if the americans are trying to convince china, they will not supply any weapons in russia, well, how much is there? the official position of the prc now is that no e-e deliveries are taking place with the permission of the chinese government, and all that can happen are private companies. this is very interesting. we are useless, it's all private business. and what do we have with private business? is it possible to use some leverage here so that the central apparatus of the communist party or the government of china does not do this to their business, or is it

much deeper? it is decided in a different way. yes, this is indeed a hybrid hybrid use of your own companies, but for this there is a sanctioning law that was adopted in 2017, the law of the russian federation, which punishes any enterprises that do business with russian enterprises. and that is why the rocket is a chinese enterprise. which is subject to these sanctions, they decide on the possibility of cooperating with american companies, they decide on the possibility of buying any equipment in which american technologies were used under license american chips, any american spare parts, they are prohibited from participating in the purchase of any equipment on the american market that is sold by the american government

. you have to stop these companies too, so that they private companies enter any business with russia with russian military companies oleksandr, if you analyze the united states, for example, what the country will definitely not go to in terms of sanctions against the russian federation, because well, it's no secret that there are financial ties, there is business, there are those people who are ready to go against the sanctions in the united states despite the official the position of the state that it will not go in the sense of sanctions, the united states will not go at the very beginning of a full-scale invasion of russia into ukraine for a long time, 8 probably western countries, the allies of the states discussed what kind

of sanctions should be taken, which on the one hand would be very painful for russia, for its economy, including the military economy, and at the same time, so as not to shoot itself in the foot with such an expression, since not if, for example , a sharp restriction on the export of russian oil was allowed, then it would hit the people who are not interested, what is interesting then they don't take it any further, but in terms of economy and the military economy of western europe, which could not, let's say, work in the mode that would be necessary for ukraine to supply weapons to the ukrainian theater of war actions, that is, all that a-a sanctions that can cause economic damage to the american military sector, for example, nickel, titanium, a-a even in the same, for example , the same pesticides that are supplied by the russian agricultural market to the world market

, the americans do not want the world market to take if there was a crisis of hunger for juice, on the one hand - this is definitely a purely humanitarian problem, it is a global freezer problem, but on the other hand, this is also the result of the fact that without these countries, they can again have such a flood of years and thereby force the european populist parties that come to power and will probably start looking for some way to solve this issue, and this top of the issue will always be at the expense of ukraine, the same thing that trump said very recently that if he comes to power , he will solve the problem very quickly all the territorial integrity of ukraine, that's why the americans will not go to the test that can hit them themselves in the military sector, especially let's keep an eye on these signed actually well, a lot of things, yes

, a lot of things have changed in europe. we'll see how what will be the reaction of the united states? thank you, mr. oleksandr, for joining us. thank you for your comments. oleksandr ivanov was with us. economists and financial analysts from the united states of america were with us. of security in the northern regions of ukraine, in addition, zelenskyi commented on the decision of the ncrecp to raise water tariffs , calling it shameful and unprofessional god health, dear ukrainians, dear ukrainian women, we are ending this day in the rivne region, held another field meeting on key security issues in the northern regions of our state, our measures to strengthen security, everything that concerns the border of our axis forces in the north and ukrainian strategic objects such as rivne the nuclear plant at which

the stake actually took place were the intelligence reports of the central committee of the commander of the north , the head of the border service, the minister of internal affairs, the head of the regional state administration of the rivne region regarding social issues and needs of the people, there was also a report by the head of the energy atom kotin, the director of the rivne npp, in general, they worked out in detail not only everything related to the physical security of our strategic facilities and the northern regions, but also such issues as cyber security. thank you to everyone in the rivne region and here at the rivne npp . along the entire perimeter of our northern border. who cares about the security of ukraine and our people? another package of sanctions against ukraine was published today. this is about those who help

russia wage this terrorist war, in particular, sanctions against the limit of three hundred legal entities and almost 200 individuals, and it is not only citizens of russia, everyone in the world who will help the aggressor receives the response of ukraine and the whole world today , prime minister of spain sanchez visited ukraine very symbolically on the first day of the start of the spanish presidency in to the council of the european union, this clearly indicates a new reality, our common european home could not always be imagined as complete without ukraine, and now we have reached the political level that european affairs are no longer considered without ukraine, this visit mr. prime minister sunny talks about the priorities of the spanish presidency and our cooperation

. i thank you spain for the defense, political, and economic support separately . all the necessary conditions for our people to return home to ukraine by the way , today we signed a joint statement with mr. prime minister sanchos on supporting the european and euro-atlantic perspective of ukraine, and this is already 21 such statements, that is, the majority supported our perspective, in particular its perspective on membership in the alliance belgium is denmark our friends from estonia italy iceland spain canada latvia is lithuania netherlands germany is norway and poland romania slovakia slovenia finland france czech republic - this is montenegro and sweden , i thank all of you, i am grateful to your countries, with which we do not yet have similar joint signature statements and declarations, but which absolutely clearly support ukraine on the way to nato, so

they support the approach of real peace in the whole thank you europe one more today there was a message from the national commission for energy and communal services about the increase in water tariffs to say the least shameful decision is not professional and not agreed with the government we cannot and will not take such decisions calmly the government is instructed to present a solution in response they will be glory to ukraine when the country trembles from the explosions when the night becomes day from the explosions we worry about our relatives and we are worried about our help forces against air defense hold the heavenly front they protect us, and we must protect them . do not take photos and

videos of air defense operations on the internet. ukraine is a sovereign and independent state, its territory is intact and

inviolable. human trafficking, the risks of falling into sexual or labor exploitation are real due to the loss of homes , lack of funds, documents taken, means of communication, limited movement, access to medicine, rest, food, forcing or inducing sexual acts , being drawn into financial dependence due to debts , all these are signs of falling into a situation of trafficking people are in danger or see what others are in, call to learn more about safety rules and opportunities to help ukraine will not give up part of its territory to stop the war , the advisor to the head of the president's office mykhailo podolyak emphasized this, he noted that any concession to the aggressor will necessarily provoke him

to the growth of aggressive appetites , let's hear the primitive agreements of the territory in exchange for peace invariably lead only to the escalation of the conflict and the next stages of the war, however , no mature and sovereign country especially of global level and global subjectivity will never agree to such agreements. if you want to preserve self-respect and freedom and never offer suicide to other partner countries, this is the same axiom. mykhailo podolyak, adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine . territory of russia to stop the war , in addition, the 45th president of the united states said that putin is somewhat weakened by the mutiny of pvk wagner from the united states, they should use this moment

for negotiations between kiev and moscow trump added that the first thing that washington should do now is to appoint a mayor by gathering russia and ukraine for its conclusion, let's talk about it in more detail, it's actually very interesting and , well, it's actually very strange to hear the statements of even the current president of the united states about what and how to do who with whom should we reconcile and which territories should we give in a country that is currently at war or should we not give to whom are these messages sent and what is trump doing now? well, you know that trump is asking to be balanced again for the president and unfortunately, the judge will ask for public opinion today, eh, everything can change, i really hope. well, for now, it looks like there will be another author of the 20th year, that is, countries against biden, and trump means that he has ties to

the kremlin, well, to russia, another 70 in the 1960s, i even have a very long article on this topic , uh, called ukraine under trump’s fire, where are all these connections ? power like putin in russia to get of the same type, some sort of power in america, that is, it how would it notice dictators not only putin well, how in particular is this him in some sense in what sense in the complete set they envy and this is part of his ego now in the pre-election company and here the two problems created there are the first problematic, short, urgent , he sets up part of his voters to what we do not need in america should not help ukraine in the form in which we help and america may have to force both parties to agree that ukraine should give up territories in the process he has already spoken about this agreement several times in the dead or in direct texts. this is not the first time he has said this, but the second time he is giving a long-term

signal to putin that if putin manages to drag out this war, let's say for a year and a half, and then trump will win the election, then maybe the problem with ukraine will be as it were. from putin's point of view, it will be decided and or maybe there will be some other candidate who will share trump's ideas on the issue and thus give putin the hope that he needs to continue to drag on this war. well, the ego’s reaction is also interesting, well, it’s also a mutiny. it’s beautiful. he says that it’s the opposite time to put putin at the negotiating table, despite the fact that other western partners of ukraine are saying that this is the opposite time to push it, in particular, ursula fondulein said literally yesterday, yes, about that. that it's time to double support for ukraine, taking advantage of the current discord between the security forces of the russian federation. well

, the difference is simple, but i think that from the point of view of the fact that the rebellion weakens putin beautifully, this is more or less a consensus in a mixture of our councils and our analysts, they are simply not up to the end. it is clear what exactly to do with it and how exactly to use it if the use and support of ukraine must definitely continue. in any case, we cannot predict who will be in russia and how exactly putin can lose power it's impossible, but what happened now in the hallway. in any case, it's a pleasant signal that it's possible, and again, if the west and ukraine endure and resist this war, then the opposite can be said about taking and putting he won't last and it's over, well, for our benefit, for our joint benefit

, dmitri , i just want to ask you about increasing support . yes, who a few months ago, six months ago, insisted that it was necessary to break this closed circle and finally give ukraine f16 planes because the soviet union was doing the same thing during the vietnam war. joined this joint appeal to the white house to joseph biden regarding the speedy transfer of atakams missiles to ukraine and already even cnn writes that a decision is close and another decision is close about cluster munitions what is going on there in general you know better when these decisions will be made i i can’t tell you when this all resolved, i can then roll the context, that’s what i’ve already said many times that there were estimates of sharp escalation from the point of view of lake weapons plus the influence

of china. such miscalculations that they were afraid of. what can the supply of more powerful weapons be able to play, as it were, against against ukraine against us , again, if we very much pass weapons or weapons supplies from china to russia, it will not be very good. more powerful weapons, the issue with aviation, the issue of fighters, eh, the benefit of ukraine has also been decided , but the problem is that it takes time to train pilots and install these fighters, so this issue has already been resolved, eh it's just eh unfortunately they won't come forward now when ukraine video from the counteroffensive it can happen optimistically they say in the fall that the problem with them was actually because i know it's not publicized not because our press leaked the problem was n't that that we no longer wanted to be delivered to us for some reason, and the fact is that we do not have enough of them in our arsenal to give them away

, that is, some amount must be kept in the american arsenal, and we simply do not have enough to produce them, we do not have time that's why the situation is like this, this is what i heard, again, everything can change, maybe some new solution will be adopted on this account, but this is what i know about it you are absolutely correct in what you said. with what is happening in our field, we are afraid of how the counteroffensive continues. they react in the same way to the united states and provide or not provide certain weapons . is our pilots trained or not? threats, what is happening to the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, that is, the fact that it can really be blown up is confirmed by all the special services, not only of ukraine, but also of the united states, there uh, well, russia does not rule out that all these reactors are mined and so on, that is, these processes also slow down the aid that we

can we receive, or on the contrary, provide more weapons so that this does not happen, uh, well, the position of america, i think, it is possible to describe it like this, it is necessary to create the conditions for putin so that he understands that the use of nuclear weapons tactical yes first of all i reflect this tactically and your or your example and well, a terrorist act against the largest nuclear power plant in europe so that it cost us much more than well, if he refuses it, this is the case and therefore all these situations are weighed what what can motivate him escalations and at the same time explain what the consequences will be if he does it if putin uses i said in the previous broadcast if putin uses a tactical nuclear bomb or i think the same applies to the explosion of the zaporozhye nuclear power station, what our special services will surely be able to find out

. well , how exactly was it planned? this is america and nato, but i am referring to numerous generals who believe that in response the black sea fleet will be destroyed , all russian equipment will be destroyed on ukrainian territory, and i suspect that it will be inflicted strike отвевный удары and even more and on the territory, again, i do not have access to secret information, i am telling you this based on what is known in open sources , based on the opinion of our multi-star generals , resignations, and in general, from interviews with our soldiers, and the statement is also one republican, litsey graham, that if russia decides to use nuclear weapons , then the united states and nato will actually enter the war, this is also, well , populist enough, or because of the republicans'

thinking about it. embroider the resolution that was proposed, proposed in the game, and in the senate it is non-binding , that is, biden ’s administration already has a plan. ah, but this plan exists. in any case , will the senator accept the resolution or not the prize, that is , that is the scenario that i described, this is most likely what can be expected. what is the answer ? of course, if nato destroys the black sea fleet, we can read it can be said what for so that we are actually in the middle of the war , of course, we are not in direct conflict between nato countries, between america and russia. i just want to remind our viewers and listeners that graham is a republican. and during one of the briefings, when he stated that the united states could react in some way to a nuclear attack, he was there. at the beginning

of his investigation, dmitry, if you remember , he praised the president of the united states joseph biden, he said, i am proud of our president, who openly and clearly stated that the nuclear threat from the russian federation exists, and it sounded like that, you know, just as a response to all critics and people who are creating narratives, as if there is some kind of split between the republicans and joseph biden. joseph biden is a democrat. you know, i didn’t hear this exact quote, but it doesn’t surprise me because he’s a hawk, he’s from the old republican party , although unfortunately, when trump came to in all other matters, except for foreign policy, he can completely take over power. well, as it were, he sided with trump, and in the republican party now , er

, there is a rift. this is exactly what happened in history on the issue of wars in ukraine. there is an old party before trump that is, until the 15th and 16th years, who were hawks much more aggressive than the democrats, a-a, who remained hawks, a-a, and who, er, well, i don’t know, they speak of the future, they criticize the administration, so what they do is not enough, that is they want, on the contrary, to america did even more, supplied even more weapons, even more aid and, in general , took an even more aggressive position against russia. example a-and in this wing of the hidden degree in this question there is a landing party, too, because he asked and ours, he asked the trumpist to say that he believes that this is a territorial conflict and

then when she rushed at him, he tried to explain to the hawk that in fact he does not think that he is misunderstood, but the problem is that between these two candidates it is not because of ukraine, but because of other factors, and now between them, somewhere between 75-80% of the votes are within of the republican party, here in the presidential elections, again, it is not because of ukraine, but in trumpovka up to 50 in the landing of the sokol, twenty -five people will hang it there, plus or minus 5%. and the rest of the candidates, by the way, who are running for office, in which maybe 5-6 percent , one percent, they are just one of these hawks from the republican party, which you think is not being done enough, this split exists, and this is visible in if you watch the interview and so on, that is all known, and as a result of this split the difference between the republicans is about one percent , and that is, the majority of the republicans is still more than 10% below the previous one. well, different questions are asked, but it is possible to say that

the audiocrats still support ukraine, and this figure is closer to 80%. percent, because the democrats follow the policies of the president, the poets of the democratic president, and part of the republicans reacts to trump's statement, and this is how it would be if you describe our political situation in full, and in the matter of ukraine. to get the numbering , therefore, yes, it creates serious problems , by the way, despite the fact that in any election in the united states, the first place is internal issues, not so much issues foreign policy, but in the case of biden, for example, you and i also said this on the air that in his case, how the presidential elections will be held and whether he will be the next president , the ukraine factor plays a role here, because biden invests a lot of money in this and the united states

the states are taking well, we understand what kind of participation in this war it is now with biden's own rating. taking into account how trump is speaking and how republicans and democrats are speaking, and again, how for the context ukraine is naturally not the first the question of american voters, but i would say so in biden, biden has invested political capital. that is, if he speaks clearly, it has already been poured, and it is clear that there is financial help now, from the point of view of american politics, he invested his political capital in the support of ukraine, that is, he took the position that we will fight with ukraine to the end, we will fight to the end, and support if we do not fight directly from ukraine to victory, this is the official position of the administration, that is, uh, this has been said repeatedly, we will not указывать в украине как как что делать na what will they agree to what will they agree to our task is to the extent that we can support it, how about the supply of weapons, financial humanitarian

aid, and so on, if ukraine starts to lose for some reason, it can naturally have a negative impact. i don't want to say to catastrophically on the rating of biden well, this may affect him a little - there will be some negative on his side , the rating may fall and because, again, he invested politically in this issue украйоночёт проигрывать между он, accordingly, this defeat will be political, and it will partially spread to the sky. this is how i see this, and i have estimated the political consequences of this war . i'll briefly ask you to comment on the last statement. the miele brand is the chairman of the chiefs of staff. but from a political point of view, this is the diplomatic first time, for the first time, an american citizen, a high military rank, actually repeated

the statement of president volodymyr zelenskyi and the statement of valery zaluzhny, our commander-in-chief, that the counteroffensive is going slowly because the russians had time to gain a good foothold in the occupied territories, this is the first time that he said that it is difficult to conduct a counterattack because russia has not established itself and this and this, how do you understand the hint on the other hand, it is possible that our western partners delayed their support for a very long time, including decisions about tanks, and you know , if you look at it as if you were in the present, look at the past, of course well, there is such a concept when we look back that it is visually ideal , that is. of course, we are beginning to understand that it was necessary to support , er, ukraine, and our weapons are more powerful weapons as quickly as possible from the very beginning. well , of course, all these decisions were made in