[000:00:00;00] dear colleagues, the successor to project 93:54 is a draft of the law on the creation of a park of monuments of the holy park art of national significance of mezhyhirya. i put forward a proposal to include this issue in the agenda of the session . i ask you to vote for 255. the decision is accepted. vote for 221 more decisions have been made dear colleagues with a discussion can we discuss yes ok

then please sign up two for two against vn gerashchenko dear colleagues, i want to join the announced president according to zelenskiy of the all-ukrainian discussion of the ukrainian doctrine, it is very important for ukraine to become a member of the eu and nato , but for this, not only our armed forces must actually defend the country so heroically, demonstrating the highest standards, for this, not only we must make progress in protecting our ecology and definitely definitely create new parks

for this, we have to fight corruption , and mezhihirya park is a monument to corruption, but soon a wax sculpture of yanukovych will have to be moved there as a reminder of the new to the authorities, what is happening with corruption today? i want to turn to the party, the servant of the people, and ask: what about mr. trubitsen, who somehow escaped from ukraine with the help of our security forces, and you just expelled him from the party from the faction ? local government bodies. please tell me. and how does it happen that today in our country this corruption permeates e ministries and departments that are already at international conferences ? representatives of european solidarity were included, they just returned from london and i know that at each panel they said one thing: the heroic armed forces are the heroic ukrainian

people, but we have to fight corruption, you know yesterday the president said a lot of important words, but for some reason he did not mention corruption, which even in the 19th year was a hindrance and the country today, when he meets with business, business already says that yanukovych is resting compared to these new young corrupt people who were packed even during the war, all these military commissars, all these scum who then flee from country, so we will vote for mezhyhirya, but let's do a little together to overcome corruption in ukraine, otherwise, the only thing to clarify is iryna volodymyrivna, the representative of your faction was included in the trip but did not go, alekseev. i did not know that you had already excluded oleksiy from the faction. thank you very much let's move on, please move on litvinov eh oleksandr mykolayovych i understand bondarenko

yes, please pass it on dear colleagues the committee on environmental policy of nature use considered this draft law on the creation of a landmark park the holy park art for the day of state significance mezhyhirya e.e. recommended by its decision in the verkhovna rada to adopt this law as a basis and in general what is provided for in this law this law provides for the creation of a landmark park in the territory of the vyshgorod district of the kyiv region at the expense of state- owned lands which are granted to him for permanent use, to form a special administration of the mezhyhirya court park of monuments of art of national importance and to approve the regulations that must be approved by the ministry of environment dear colleagues, we in the end, we have to adopt this law , we have to decide on the legal status of this object, definitely an object of state significance, we have to finally transfer this

object to state ownership, we have to break both the legal connection and the consequential connection, and in general forget yanukovych's name erase yanukovych's name from our history adoption of this law will be one of the steps for this i ask you to support it legally and accept it in the first and second reading as a whole thank you please klymenko yuliya leonidovna fraction voice of kosatka lesya vasylenko thank you colleagues 93:54 this is only a slightly better version of its previous version 8341, but there are some significant comments of the environmental community to this draft law, which i want to voice today. article 37 of the law of ukraine on the nature reserve fund

defines parks, monuments of garden and park art as the most significant and valuable examples of park construction that are preserved , including for aesthetic and scientific purposes , in mezhyhirya - this a priori does not correspond to this definition, at most it is a monument to the zhlovts and corruption and this is a quote with which i very much agree. if there is a real goal to protect the ecosystem and the network of biodiversity that has been formulated and formed on the territory of mezhyhirya , then there are valid mechanisms in the law for this purpose, it is possible to create a national park on this territory , these national parks are created by decree of the president there are mechanisms, there are tools for this, but for some reason it is not being done further . in the draft law, it is indicated that 69 million uah are needed for its implementation, where the amount came from is also not clear. to date, mezhihirya has 52 million hryvnias of debt, plus more than 13 million

hryvnias per year are needed only for electricity for this park for this structure , that's why it is necessary to support this very specific and political and by no means ecological mechanism for today . i understand, it is transmitted by mr. ivan hryhorovych, yes , please serhii volodymyrovych dear colleagues , after that we will vote, please thank you, dear mr. chairman, the homeland absolutely supports the issue of transforming mezhihirya into a garden park to the monument of garden and park art of national significance but i would like to agree with those colleagues who said that mezhyhirya - this is not about the mezhihirya park - it is about the total corruption that existed in ukraine, and here colleagues mentioned zhehirya yanukovych was handed over to yanukovych by a kind of forgotten politician, viktor

andriyovych yushchenko, in 2007, and by the way , mr. tarasyuk, who was in charge of the duchy during yushchenko's time, made a deal with the investigation and received a suspended sentence precisely because of yanukovych's transmissions. mezhyhirya yanukovych was handed over after the parliamentary elections of 2007, when it was already clear to yanukovych's government that slippers would already be another government and yushchenko then, before handing over the entire country to yanukovych in the 10th year, he decided to present mezhyhirya to him in 2007 by signing the relevant documents, i have a simple question: where is the criminal case against of this criminal against viktor andriyovych yushchenko, this case was initiated several years ago, but for some reason it was hidden somewhere there, somewhere it disappeared , the assessment of this politician is not being given now , on the contrary, he is being pulled out periodically in tv and start telling that he is the best ukrainian president , he is not the best ukrainian president, he is a corrupt person who handed over mezhyhirya to yanukovych

, and next to yanukovych's name , yushchenko should be written in capital letters on mezhyhirya and underlined twice so that such things never happen. to the law enforcement agencies, i ask you to consider this speech as a parliamentary appeal to the law enforcement agencies regarding the initiation of a criminal case against viktor andriyovych yushchenko for mezhyhirya. this is what yushchenko did not expect let's even remember dear colleagues, let's move on to making a decision, e.e., the proposal of the committee based on the basis as a whole. i understand that under is not supported by oleg volodymyrovych as a basis , we only put what as a basis, then

let's just ask who is the basis on the whole , we can dear colleagues serhiy, we can on the basis in general, as a basis, only yes , you do not object, vote for the basis, only yes, i understand correctly, european solidarity, too , only as a basis draft draft of the law on the creation of a park of monuments of horticultural art of national importance mezhihirya registration number 93 54 please vote for 243 still accepted eh let's go then i will put a proposal to oleg volodymyrovych

bondarenko asks to shorten the time frame for preparing for the second reading therefore, i put forward a proposal to shorten the deadline for submission of a proposal on the right to prepare for the second reading of the draft law 93:54 i ask the people 's deputies to vote well, how did it happen 219 for the decision was not adopted before we are preparing without shortening the terms 91-29 dear colleagues, this is a draft law on amending article 10 of the law of ukraine on museums and museum affairs regarding the procedure for further use

of museum collections in the event of reorganization of museums. for 246 the decision was made, i put a proposal to consider this issue according to the shortened procedure, i ask you to vote for 220 the decision was made, please, colleagues, there is a need to discuss, maybe someone will, apart from european solidarity, let's

two minutes of european solidarity and let's vote, who please where is zhetsky dear colleagues, in 2 minutes we'll vote and if someone else is there, then we'll sign up, friends , just a second, please sign up two for two against , but you come, if you sign up, you'll just be the first to speak, please sign up two for two against, please, when to release the sanction passes the floor, i understand yes, please, thank you dear colleagues, well, this project itself is quite simple . in the event of the organization of a merger, accession, allocation of museums based on the state communal form of ownership, the order of further use of their museum collections is determined with the approval of zaminkult. it is obvious that

it is worth supporting. integral state policy of preservation of cultural values ​​of the museum fund, taking into account the damage suffered by this sphere in connection with russian aggression when we have long needed invite ministers here, in particular the minister of culture, do you know how many ukrainian museums were destroyed during the russian aggression ? when to talk about cultural policy today we touched on the issue of the church, which continues the russian church to operate in ukraine covering our lavra and kyiv-pechersk and pochaivska we saw the terrible conclusion of the venetian commission

regarding the law on national minorities, our state, which was represented there by the nationalities service, was actually inactive and did not counter the danish attacks of hungary and our other enemies, we must change our cultural policy, cultural politics is part of our security and the whole reason. we need to hold normal hearings in this hall to listen to the minister of culture, because after our victory it will turn out that all our property will be destroyed not only by the aggressors but also by us because of our terrible indifference and nothing will be preserved for us thank you dear colleagues , please nalyvaichenko e.e. hand over to e.e. serhii mykolayovych yevtushka please thank you mr. chairman serhiy tushon, faction of the fatherland rivne region regarding the draft law dear colleagues, he absolutely positive in view of the fact that our skilled managers invented, in addition to liquidation, a number of other synonyms in the form of

reorganization, optimization, mergers, mergers , and everything else so that this would not happen to our museums so that the lands near our museums are not stolen, obviously this draft law provides for the introduction of amendments to article ten of the law of ukraine on museums and museum affairs, and here it is that all the norms that i mentioned, merging , joining, optimization, are also on the list that forbid carrying out i just want to remind you now, dear colleagues , about our values, the museum exhibits that took place very recently on june 9 this year , after almost 10 years, the judge of the supreme court of the netherlands committed the museum to alara person to return the scythian gold to ukraine and here is honor and praise in the supreme court of the netherlands and the second glaring moment about which i want to say that as a result of the agreement during

the visit to ukraine of the minister of culture of france rime a budmala in february 23rd of the year at the beginning of may this year luv took 16 works of art for safekeeping in order to protect them from the war. these are our exhibits. these are our partners who undertake to store in one way or another in their museums. in particular, those values, these collections of museum exhibits that were collected in ukraine were ukrainian. russian federation is trying to steal them in every possible way and act like barbarians, that is why we support this draft law, thank you, thank you, please nestor ivanovich shufrych and this is the final speech, after that we will vote dear colleagues thank you dear colleagues, this bill and accepting it

is absolutely convinced that we must proceed from the same preservation of cultural and ancient and historical values ​​that are kept in our museums, and for this we should not waste time and rather vote for whom, because with all due respect to the museum business, i absolutely convinced we have other important questions thank you for your attention thank you dear colleagues, we have finished discussing this issue, we are moving on to making a decision dear colleagues, i propose to adopt as a basis , with elaboration of the provisions of the relevant part of the first article 116 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the draft law on amending the article of the tenth law of ukraine on museums and museum affairs regarding the procedure for further use of museum collections in the event of reorganization of museums, registration number 9129

, ready to vote, i ask the people's deputies vote for 247 seconds, i will now ask my colleagues. you do not mind in general, we can vote in general . well , i put this proposal in the annual committee. finalization is needed, let's do it, we can shorten the deadlines so that they can finalize it faster . let's put a proposal to shorten the deadlines for preparing for the second reading of the draft law

9129. i ask the people's deputies to vote because i see you voted 116 i understand what is there something needs to be worked out, yes, please vote for 249, the decision has been made. thank you, colleagues , the following draft law 75 74-d is a draft law on making changes to some legislative parties of ukraine . individuals, entrepreneurs, we negotiated for three minutes, vlasenko, and after that we will vote, please serhiy volodymyr and now i will bet, i will repeat it again, please please, thank you seriously, sir, the presiding faction, the motherland has a systematic, systemic vision. how should judicial reform be carried out in the country? we believe that the use of electronic offices in the way it

is happening now, namely in a coercive way , is unacceptable, especially during a war, even more so when our territory is being shelled especially when we have problems with the internet on the territory of the country, we believe that in such a situation it is not necessary, it is impossible to prematurely introduce the obligation of the subjects of certain subjects to register in electronic offices and further communicate with the court only within electronic offices, that is, at least it will be the duty of the court to do so, the party can send documents in writing, but the court will communicate with it only in electronic offices, we consider the absolutely correct position of the committee, the profile of which i the position that was adopted at the insistence of the homeland faction , namely the exclusion of e-e natural persons-entrepreneurs and the mandatory introduction of communication with the court using electronic offices from this list, we believe

that it is absolutely wrong to accept 84:01 against the background of other issues that complicate the life of entrepreneurs today, it is impossible to oblige natural persons-entrepreneurs to communicate with the court exclusively in electronic form, this will mean that any court document , any what kind of subpoena, yes, we are not talking about criminal proceedings in this bill, but disputes and court communications in other judicial jurisdictions, e-e, according to this bill, it is planned to take place only in electronic form by the court. yes, we as a faction of the motherland, we believe that such an obligation of electronic communication with the court should first of all be applied to state bodies, to local self-government bodies, there are no problems here, everything related to the state communicates with another

state body judicially in electronic form, and everything else should take place in a voluntary manner and only in the case when a person participating in the legal process has written a corresponding statement to the court about it, if there is no such statement, in our opinion, communication should take place in the usual form by paper i i will emphasize once again that we in the motherland consider this unacceptable, especially during the war , especially during the shelling , especially when our critical infrastructure facilities are being destroyed, including facilities that provide internet access to the territory of ukraine , thank you, thank you, dear colleagues. i see from the table that the amendment that changes the name of this law is also taken into account, but i put in the name as it is, but it will change the new name dear colleagues, please prepare for the vote

, i put the proposal to accept in the second reading and in its entirety, with the necessary technical and legal amendments, the draft law on amending some legislative acts of ukraine regarding the mandatory registration and use of electronic cabinets in the unified court of information and communication systems by representatives of natural professions , legal entities and natural persons , entrepreneurs, registration number 75 74-d please of people's deputies to vote for 226 decisions adopted the law was adopted as a whole by factions show thanks let's move on to

the next 90-78 we agreed without discussion this is a draft law on making changes to section 15 of the final provisions of the law of ukraine on mandatory state pension insurance regarding sources of payment for pension delivery services and payment of burial benefits, i propose to adopt the draft law in the second reading and as a whole with the necessary technical legal amendments 9078 are ready to vote, i ask the people 's deputies to vote for 249 a decision has been made to adopt the following draft law as a whole 91 41 is a draft law on amendments to the law of ukraine on the status of war veterans, guarantees of social protection regarding the simplification of the procedure for assigning veteran status, i am now proposing to include this issue in

the agenda of the session, i am asking to vote for 245, the decision is accepted, i am putting proposals for solving this issue according to a shortened procedure, i am asking to vote for 220, the decision is accepted dear colleagues , please there is a need to discuss whether it can be accepted, then write it down two for two against those factions who wish

, please stepan ivanovich kubiv please dear sir, please give the floor to ms. sofia from fedina, please sofia romanivna fedina at today's stage, 51% of veterans have a problem with the registration of ubd, because mostly they receive a refusal from the registration of certificates, the problem is the same , the first is that at the level of parts they cannot receive the relevant documents, the problem with the registration of the vlk is the impossibility of obtaining documents which provide an opportunity for one-time monetary assistance, but there is also a problem in that there are no deadlines for providing a certificate of disorientation among military personnel, what to do, a large proportion of groundless refusals and certificates from mini to sample, these issues must be resolved, but the main question is whether this draft law resolves these issues. unfortunately, the ministry of defense, the ministry

of veterans affairs, and the main expert administration also emphasize that there is no sufficient solution to the issue. despite this, this draft law is in the form in which it is currently prescribed, it creates additional obstacles , for example, it bureaucratizes the process and, on the contrary , extends the terms for the possible provision of a certificate , but also in this draft law there is an uncertainty of terms and dispersion of legal norms in this case, it would be possible to solve this issue with certificates, as suggested by gneu, in particular, through the automatic provision of a certificate without the application of a serviceman or relatives of the deceased . at this stage, european solidarity refrains from voting for this draft law, we hope that it will be professionally revised by the second reading and then , of course, we support it, because the solution to the issue of providing ubd for military personnel is critically important, and we

always support such things, and one more point literally last week, i was approached by a unit from the front line, which has been there for one and a half years, it cannot get certificates , one and a half years ago, let's actively work on it and do everything possible to make life easier for military personnel. thank you, please. words are given to people's deputy shvachko anton oleksiyovych. the faction of the political party, the servant of the people, please convey the word. ihoryu cherneva yehor chernihiv publishing house good afternoon , colleagues, i am the author of this bill, i will tell you what it is very very simple. of the status of a participant in hostilities exists today, i can give you one figure from february 24 to today

, only 8,000 combatants have been issued certificates of the status of a participant in hostilities, eight thousand, and when we were registering this bill, we, together with the ministry of defense and the ministry of veterans other ways of solving this problem also worked, so this bill will not solve all the problems, there are parallel processes about digitizing this process as much as possible so that a person does not collect his papers that he already provided in this draft law, we oblige the state not to demand from people those documents that it already has from them and not passport data, other documents if the state already has them . it is necessary to go for these certificates, to provide these pieces of paper again to the state, which owns all this, about this draft law, to oblige the state not to withhold the documents it already has and thereby