[000:00:00;00] 57 decision not taken next number of letters lysich and i have a good one, so i will not put no confirmation, i will not insist on all my more than 100 edits ah, but here it is important, i will apply again, maybe my colleagues will feel it is important that we leave a moratorium on checks this is very good, but it is also important to leave preferential taxation for those businesses that actually work in bila. we understand with you our task to build a taxi system. that we are looking for those who work in the shadows and it is precisely on them that pressure is applied today everything is turned on its head again. because the more you work

, that's how this white shirt comes to you, because you can be seen, you pay, then you are known. no one is working, no one will come to you, but you and i can still accept anything, please support oleksiyovych, you never said the number of the amendment. how did you go under thank you, dear colleagues, amendment 15-17, i will find it now. dear colleagues, who will answer , immediately tell me the number of the amendment that i

i managed to find it at 15:17 authorship of goncharenko, it was rejected by the committee . i ask you to vote for 49. the decision was not made. dear colleagues, european solidarity no longer has rights. i already drank, i had time to watch and yurchyshyn will still send 670. dear colleagues , it refers to increasing the limits for the first group of individual entrepreneurs, the rationale is very simple, the last time we linked it these limits to minimum wages, etc. in general, the situation in the country has changed, the value of the currency has increased by 40%, inflation has decreased by 30%. the cost of fuel has increased by 30%, respectively, such limits, which were adopted several years ago thanks to you and me, they absolutely do not correspond to the market situation, the business situation, which is the current economic situation in the country, therefore, my request is to change the size of the limit for the first group

of individuals -entrepreneurs up to 220 e minimum wages are asked to support and vote for the 670 authorship amendment vasylchenko, by the rejection committee, i ask you to vote for 45, the decision was not made, please, the next amendment is the number of fops of individual entrepreneurs, this amendment refers to the second group of individual entrepreneurs and actually proposes to increase such a limit to a thousand minimum wages dear colleagues, i really ask for your attention for that that we give the opportunity to small entrepreneurs, in particular to natural persons of the second group

, to work legally in white clothes in the white plain, despite the fact that they had the possibility not to pay taxes during the martial law, in particular the first and second group of natural persons-entrepreneurs. they are all the same, most of them did it, and with this amendment we will simply make their work easier and ensure proper conditions for the development of business. please support this amendment 671 vasylchenko's amendment, it was rejected by the committee i ask you to vote for 47, the decision will not come, the next one, please

, applies to us similarly, the increase in the limits for fops for natural persons-entrepreneurs , in fact, this amendment concerns the third group and here is a very constructive proposal. i know that many people's deputies submitted amendments to this draft law regarding increasing the limits for fops, so i ask you to unite and support these proposals, in particular, my amendment states that if, accordingly , an individual entrepreneur of the third group does not have employees, we keep at the same level as me, 1,167 minimum wages , if a person, uh, you hired 10 people, then accordingly, this limit increases to three thousand, and if i am hired officially for work more than 10 people are employed, then such a limit is increased to 6,000 minimum wages. why is this amendment important? it will really stimulate the official employment of people

. that is why you need amendment 672. it was rejected by the committee. it was authored by vasylchenko and colleagues . the amendment is put to the vote. please vote for 48. the decision has not been made. please next halyna, what is the next amendment of 18:44 , which refers to the non-applicable application of fines if natural persons-entrepreneurs do not use the pro, in fact, so that you have a moratorium on the application of fines for non-use of settlement transaction registrars was extended until the end of martial law. why is this amendment important? you know that there are many

regulations in this draft law that provide for the application of fines, whether it is certain types of checks that are returned and everything else. this is all aimed at the business that already exists a registered person who pays taxes but receives very little attention from the state and turns to the side where business activities are generally carried out without any registration, i.e. the relevant state bodies do not carry out their work properly and do not bring to the wall that business that really works but does not operate and does not pay any taxes. therefore, i ask you to support, dear colleagues , the amendment at 18:44, it was rejected by the

authorship committee of vasylchenko. i ask you to vote for 48, the decision was not made and the final amendment, please the number is announced, it is related to the previous amendment, it concerns the extension of the moratorium on the non-application of fines in case of non-use of settlement transaction registrars. i once again i would like to point out that the state should direct its efforts in order to remove illegal shadow business , and that business that works, that pays taxes, that is registered, works in the white, there is no need to interfere with it by putting up any obstacles, on the contrary, especially in wartime, we must ensure all the proper conditions so that entrepreneurs do not were forced to lay off their employees so that they could work and develop in the future after the end of martial law, so

i ask you to support this amendment and thereby ensure proper conditions for of micro-entrepreneurs for small entrepreneurs dear colleagues, the final amendment of public payers vasylchenko 18 55 it was rejected by the committee, i ask you to vote for 46, the decision was not made further , please, solution, how many amendments will you have innov amendments 3 yes and one number then immediately please thank you number 1 831 amendment dear colleagues i wanted to say that this amendment is based on three foundations: the first is the constitutional principle of the presumption of innocence; the second is the principle

of the inevitability of punishment, which i much more effective than the great ones, although it is just a system rather to one story, it is much more effective the inevitability of a generation of punishment than the magnitude of this punishment and the third third - these are the conditions in which we are now in the conditions of war . during martial law, this will not lead to a violation of the discipline of these entrepreneurs, but it will allow them to feel calmer at this time. thank you , dear colleagues, amendment 800 18:31 authorship

clearance by committee rejected vote for 47, the decision has not been made, please, faction vote, someone else will put their amendments into consideration, no one else, please , servant of the people, after this, the homeland, please , servant of the people of mazurasha, amendment number, i have more than 50 amendments, but i ask for three minutes and i will put them into consideration one amendment 16:25 if you can include 3 minutes, let 's reset 3 minutes and 16:25 thank you, please three minutes dear colleagues, in 2019, we adopted amendments to the law on the application of registrars of settlement transactions and obliged almost all entrepreneurs to use pro when selling goods and services, this was done

under the slogan of total fiscalization of business in order to increase tax revenues to the budget. checks and to quickly start the work of these interruptions, we allowed anyone to create this software pro based on well without certification without checking these modifications on performance of fiscal functions, it was a wrong decision, the developers of the pro took advantage of the fact that the state does not control whether the checks reach the tax server or whether taxes are paid from this check, even more so it came to the point that large taxpayers large networks began to create their own pros which they issue a check to consumers as well, but they do not send information to the dps, the dps does not send

the use of the software pro multiplies every year, but the amount of taxes from perro users is compared to the usual cash registers only decrease, this is the official statistics of the tax service, moreover, i have the results of the examination of two state software pros created by the dps of ukraine, and the export report states that even the software pros created by the tax service make it quite easy to create data on issued e-e checks, change these data or simply not to send checks to the tax service, that is, czech consumers have them in their hands, but the tax services do not have them, this is a huge hole through which the state loses tens of billions of hryvnias, tens of billions annually hryvnias, this applies to tax products as well as other goods when we talk about what we should close the pre-percentage group of the single tax, return tax audits

, tighten the nuts in a different way , because this is what the imf is all about. knows about a large-scale tax avoidance scheme, then we do not need to close it, or as i emphasize that i fully support the program ppo, it greatly simplifies life under total sterilization, but the program his as well as e-e cash registers must transmit information to the tax office. dear colleagues, amendment 16:25, authorship of mazurash, it

was rejected by the committee, i ask you to vote for 56, the decision was not made . thank you, please, fris. now, please, ihor is beautiful, well, thank you, great. i would like to ask a question 12:39 regarding the fact that, as of today, 12:39 , you have the entire list of ruslan sichova's edits, and this is it, yes , i'm sorry. because i wasn't there, if possible. it is possible then first 674-u 674 first yes 674 amendment is an amendment that increases the limit for entrepreneurs of the third group by 20 million i want to note that the indicated limits were in the 16th year and in no way did it lead to any

major problems, but now we need to provide an opportunity for one entrepreneur to have a large amount of e-e income show and not play with the registration of a separate enterprise every time, therefore, i ask that this document be taken into account and supported by the 674th amendment so you are among the authors here i see yes yes 674- and the amendment authored by fris and other colleagues, eh, i put it on the committee, it was rejected, i put it to the vote, i ask you to vote for 65, the decision was not made, please, the next amendment 12:39, an amendment is a key amendment that says that uh, as we promised at the beginning

large-scale aggression about the fact that checks should be stopped not for the entire time of martial law and this does not apply to manipulation, in fact, we made checks with documentary checks, we announced that all checks should be stopped, this was the subject of why i personally and some of my colleagues did not support draft law 84-01 until the first reading. and today, as you can see, such a light manipulation took place. everyone knew that they had amendments. it was indicated to be taken into account. i asked when they would be taken into account. they promised me somewhere in 40-45 minutes. but it turns out that they were immediately taken into account when there are no people in the hall, so consolidate as much as possible. come to the hall and vote, support the indicated amendments so that we fulfill the obligation that during the martial law we will not have

any checks on entrepreneurs at all, please please put the 12:39 amendment to the vote, it was rejected by the committee, i ask you to vote for 79, the decision was not made , the next amendment 12.50 i correctly understand the next amendment 12.50, if the previous amendment did not come and for the previous block regarding the transfer of checks, then i would like to focus on 40 in the part of the procedure for carrying out the specified checks, unfortunately, in the first reading of the draft law, and this, in gneu's opinion , it was also determined that there are abstract, undefined formulations, for example, the abstract formulation is available at the time of the implementation verification of safe access to the territory of the premises or property of the specified work, we suggest detailing and concretizing this directly e-e security safe access is when an entrepreneur can provide such access, it is when a business entity can provide documents for the inventory of everything

else if you want carry out checks, let's still carry out these checks , answer when a person can physically provide such access, please support the indicated edit and set it to be disregarded 12:50 authorship the frieze of the committee is confusing, please vote for 77, the decision was not made, the next amendment 14-15 is correct 14 15 yes, it is absolutely let's say yes, the working working amendment is an amendment that is related to the current norms of the tax code, which states that any changes to the tax legislation in terms of ensuring the principle of stability, according to which changes to any elements of taxes and fees cannot be made

later than 6 months before the beginning of the new budget period in which the corresponding rules and rates will apply the amendment proposes to postpone the entry into force of the entire law to january 1, 24th, amendment 14-15, authored by fritz, was rejected by the committee, please determine and vote for 76, the decision was not made . correct, please, this practice proposes to exclude the provision for establishing the appropriate period when

the possibilities of controlling fines for violation of the procedure for calculating and paying a single contribution for the possibility of charging penny will begin to the payers of the single contribution and conducting documentary checks by the payers of the single contribution, well, as for the document checks, i understood that the committee made the appropriate decision. i am correct, oleksandr, that there will be no such checks, but i would like to receive the support of the hall regarding the calculation of these fines . thank you, dear colleagues, amendment at 15:00 by the committee deviation, what is determined and to vote for 79 decision not taken next 1501 please edit 1501 i understand that there is no one in the hall at all and hardly anyone supports this amendment. these are the same norms that we talked about in relation to tax audits

, here the corresponding norms of the law on the collection and accounting of the single contribution to the mandatory state social insurance regarding the non-application of fines for the specified offenses are also being amended, please take them into account and support, i put the amendment 15:01 authorship of the frieze, it was rejected by the committee, please vote for 86, the decision was not made, the next amendment 16:44 please 16:45 we will not put them as identical, but dear colleagues, i i would like you to hear me and support the indicated

amendment , if only to show you that well, do you understand what cash payment is? terminals or on the internet, it is necessary to make the indicated payment through the account settlement e-e registrar of settlement operations, that is, through the pro, it must be carried out as cash, well, it is absolutely by the nose when the national bank says that this is a non-cash transaction. and we have to punch it through the pro. it is especially interesting when it will be done by paying through remote banking services on the sites of which pro and who should issue a check in this case, please. here we need an explanation. danylo oleksandrovych, please see e it is certainly possible to withdraw it from the pro, but in exchange for the access of the tax office to bank accounts, because otherwise , all these cashless in quotation marks of calculations turn into stupid payments, which we

discovered while investigating the activities of gambling institutions that, being completely cashless, did not pay taxes, went into the shadows and stole revenues from the army during the 22nd year, and now , thank god, they came out of the wall, so the amendment is unacceptable, we rejected it. thank you, amendment 14 16 44 i apologize for amendment 16: 44 authorship of fritz, she is rejected by the rejection committee, i ask you to vote for 71 decisions have been made ihor pavlovich friz , have you removed all yours or not

? manipulation which now they showed about the implementation of these rules when half of the hall is not there, more than half of the hall is not there, which was ready to support because they said that they would consider the speeches of the first deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada, that she would be removed and now it will be, well, this is wrong, that's why i am colleagues please do not support this bill as a whole because it does not comply with the conditions of ethical decency on the one hand and on the other hand it categorically does not allow the opportunity for citizens of ukraine to work in this yesterday, i was approached by one mother who voiced the fact that her child graduated from school out of 19 children who graduated from school, 15 are going to study abroad, only four are staying to study in ukraine, so with whom will we work with such laws in 4-5 years, yes, not with whoever was in this country, there will be no entrepreneurship, nothing, thank you, thank you, ihor palych well, to be honest, i wonder about any manipulations

, i did not understand at all whether you are talking to me, we agreed that we are in factions , we are going this way we are going that way let's do it without any mutual accusations thank you dear colleagues let's go further with your corrections , i also can't understand, so please let us have factions. of the alphabet, please kovalchuk then mikysh good day , dear colleagues

, yuliya kamalchuk, lviv region, chervonogradskyi district, everything is about fops. to survive during this difficult wartime wartime period where many of them don't just donate but continue to help businesses help communities on the ground and if possible keep their own opportunity e-e from inspections for 12 months after the lifting or termination of martial law that's what we're about spoke earlier if, once again , i hear the arguments of the cabinet of ministers of the ministry of finance and the rest, if it really will give such an effect as they promise in the form of 115 billion e plus , i wanted to see myself specifically from them responsibility if they do not achieve this, so i ask you to support this amendment . thank you, yuri, if you would still start remittances. i understand amendment 12.60 correctly.

it was rejected by the committee, i ask you to vote for 68, the decision was not made next 16:14 correct yuriy please kremenchuk yes next correction 16:14 it concerns almost the same thing so i will just add just a few words if we sign with someone the memorandum is about signing a memorandum with the imf and other organizations from the eu and so on, friends. contact now from all of us . to the cabinet of ministers, since the cabinet of ministers was chosen, in fact, we voted for it. and the people we represent from the regions voted for us. we wanted to see more opportunities for consultation . together with us, representatives of the people whom we see every day on the ground and how to look them in the eyes after all these decisions so that we understand that what is being done

we are responsible for it and what is not being done we are also responsible for this, so please more representatives of the cabinet of ministers and more reporting on all memoranda for the future, and the amendment about the 12-month postponement of inspections, thank you thank you and yes , the amendment at 16:14 by kremenchuk, i ask you to vote for 73 decisions have not been made, ok, so far skorokhod, please i ask for three minutes and then a vote. thank you, dear colleagues, when we are someone else's demands, we always have to think about

our own state interests, because you can sell everything for loans and then not know how and with what pay off and give the most valuable thing, do colleagues know that part of the money received from the imf tranches goes to repay previous loans that the imf provided , do we understand that this is not just money that is given to us and poured into the economy, this is a loan , we must always remember this and before how to destroy our small business that barely survives during the war, maybe we still need to be able to negotiate and be better diplomats and be able to convince the international monetary fund that when making demands for ukraine, at least a little should be taken into account the interests of our state and our people who live here and who work honestly and pay