[000:00:00;00] thank you for being with us. it was a great artery. i will say goodbye until tomorrow until 18:10 until 18:10 and then in italy serhiy rudenko and the verdict program. good evening. we are from ukraine . glory to ukraine. this is the verdict program. my name is serhiy rudenko. greetings to everyone and i wish everyone good health on the night of july 6, the russian occupiers launched a rocket attack on lviv , according to the information of the ministry of internal affairs of ukraine, the third and fourth floors were destroyed in two entrances , five people died, more than 40 were injured, including a child. lukashenko said that he does not rule out at the beginning of the autumn negotiations between ukraine and russia

by the end of the year, as the belarusian dictator said, all nuclear warheads will be moved from the territory of the russian federation to the territory of the republic of belarus, as planned , meaning the tactical nuclear weapons agreed upon by putin and lukashenko the united states of america decided to supply ukraine with cluster bombs ammunition about it will be announced in the near future , the new york times writes about it, we will talk about it over the next hour with army general mykola malamuzh, a participant of the russian-ukrainian war, andrii milienko and military expert dmytro snyiriev, i will start a program with reports on the losses of the occupiers in ukraine , 232,300 russians have already died in ukraine in the last day alone , the armed forces of ukraine have destroyed 600 people since the beginning of the great war, russians have already lost in ukraine 4:068 tanks 7,932 armored combat

vehicles 4,310 artillery systems 657 rocket launchers 404 anti-aircraft defenses 315 aircraft 309 helicopters 688 units of motor vehicles 18 ships boats 1264 winged missiles 3,635 drones 598 special equipment for those who are currently watching and watching us on youtube i will say that we are conducting a survey today we are asking you about whether ukraine needs negotiations with russia now yes no your option please vote on our youtube page at the end of the program we let's sum up the results of this vote. and for those who are currently watching us on youtube and facebook, please like this video, subscribe to our social networks, and

in this way, please support us in on social networks, i want to introduce our first guest today, this is the former head of the foreign intelligence service of ukraine, army general mykola malamush, general . i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on our air . congratulations, glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes, so let 's start, mr. general, today's night attack on lviv, this is one of the biggest attacks on the civil infrastructure of the city of lviv from the beginning of the full-scale invasion on the night of july 6, the russian occupiers hit lviv with calibers from the waters of the black sea, according to preliminary data, five people died 37 victims were saved, 64 people were evacuated, mr. general, this is yet another act of terrorism by the russian occupiers, which shows that for the russians , there are no borders, no distances

, no distance, no south, no west of ukraine , i.e., they can use their weapons to attack anywhere the point of ukraine e. what does this mean for ukraine? how can ukraine protect itself from these ambitious neighbors, considering the weapons , which missiles the russian federation currently has and at what distances it launches these weapons a well, first of all, we have an action of terrorism, it qualifies according to all the signs , and uh, russia wiretapping acts uh, uh, almost daily and in odesa, on the dnipro, in almost all cities. this is activism, but why does putin want to look at the spirit of the people first of all, to take revenge

for the resistance that we are creating, because he was told that you will not defeat the people of ukraine , because the spirit of the people invincible you lose he can't believe it at all, now he is simply taking revenge on ordinary people, on the other hand , they are trying to find some infrastructure objects, especially defense objects , logistics objects. all the others declared that they are not hitting people, but hitting you with a plant on the airfield, there is such a constant saying well, a stage approach at the level of the president of the same russia , we also call his leadership that, but what are the means in the first place? well, for example, the reaction was

of the european union, yes, this is against the strike against the ukrainian people, that 's the way it is, we say it, and they said it today, but what? the sky is conditional, yes, in quotation marks, and what is this? these are the 50 that are in the world today, and the patriots are 40, 45, which are in italy, france , and the storm shadow, which is also shot down by ballistics - this is the chernivtsi ivy, several dozen of them are about 150 pieces of strategic, so to speak, air defense and hundreds and hundreds of tactical ones that protect the sky that protect from drones that protect our soldiers at the front, this is the format that ukraine needs today to protect not a single petri unit, there are a few pieces there, then even before or, for example, there are irises, or i promise one more there, one more and so on this is a drop in the ocean. therefore, in this situation, sympathy

is enormous , so to speak, a victim, especially in lviv, everyone sympathizes with us, but i say it directly out of sympathy, this is a content weapon of a specific air defense system. a specific answer and he says there is a discussion with putin , are you conducting a negotiation, do not conduct , i consider the language of powerful weapons, he understands it clearly. you need a lot because you need to shoot down a lot of targets, they produce only strategic norms of ballistic missiles in a month, up to 60 pieces each of which can be launched , there are 1,000 more old ones that are being launched now and the calibers they changed the trajectory, they directed

first at the capital, and then a guided missile caliber was sent to lviv in such a format in a sloppy manner, to some extent it was successful , well, in parts, they were shot down, but in part, not because in this situation, if the sky was closed, practically all of them to our state and, in fact, all large cities or powerful objects of auto power plants there will be no chance for defense objects, then even if we don't fight, nothing will happen because in this situation what we will talk about in perspective and even strike ballistics that will carry the tactical address of them from belarus or from russia, we will it will not be easy to shoot down nuclear explosions , we will shoot them down on the trajectory , everything will be scrap metal, and there are no formats, so to speak, that of a nuclear strike. there are 40-50 pieces and that's why everyone will go and smash everything. everything should be in every city and hunted, in particular, mr. general, the attack on lviv is demonstrative and demonstrative. a few tens of kilometers to

the border with a country that is part of the north atlantic alliance, and lviv even during the second world war, it did not experience such destruction as it did on the night of july 6, 2023. do you think this bombing will affect nato members themselves and which will take place on july 11-12 in vilnius, the capital of lithuania. unfortunately, i did the same yesterday there is a general reaction of condemnation, but uh, readiness for practical actions, and practical actions are air defense systems and ammunition that have been delivered today, and long-range missiles, as well as those that can be delivered in three days, and it has already been along these lines on black the sea would not have had them, we simply destroyed them in the same way. here is another one like that, there are several dozen already, and the black sea fleet is gone, and there are no calibers, and there are no strikes on lviv, but

now we must not just hear and say , yes, they sympathized, that’s right, today we must in in the training plan, right here, yes, there are really three positions, this is already an application and a clear position relatively invites us to nato , but it is a perspective, it is important, but not today , unfortunately, the second component is a contextual weapon, and first of all, this is what we say about air defense, they are in our allies in the usa, canada, britain, and many members of the european union. let's gather up to 50 42s, somewhere 43s, and there will be 100 , 40, 150 powerful systems that will cover the sky, that 's why zelensky doesn't just talk there, we're there, the application is there, yes that all the theories should be written on paper and all the prospects are good, but

today you have to specifically ask the question, you are like that, give me another option, there is no other way to look at how to passively support the terrorist act every day against the citizens, i watched a specific display format, this is exactly what lvivskyi needs uh, the powerful sacrifices and strikes that they carried out today should be served on the table in full and say we are acting like this, if not, then we are allies actively today, mr. general , the self-proclaimed president of belarus, uh , oleksandr lukashenko said that europe is ready to negotiate and he said that, first of all, france zelenskyi takes an extreme position to fight until we liberate the territory down to the last ukrainian. as oleksandr lukashenko says, let's hear how lukashenko himself evaluates his role in this story and how he applies for the role

interlocutor, although we know that his role is now the role of a co-aggressor, a co-conspirator of vladimir putin. so lukashenko, friends, it’s not just the west and not so much , but the parties need it in this case. they will start negotiations at an impasse, but while there is still a way out of this impasse , that is, there is an opportunity at the negotiating table and an agreement will be reached. eh, how much will russia talk about the strength of the situation that is developing first of all at the front and not only at the front after

the so-called counteroffensive of mr. general, i understand that putin and lukashenka are saying that we are ready for peace talks, but on our terms, that is, recognition of the occupied territory , or as they say, the recognition of the new territorial reality of russian crimea well, in this way, the fixation of this line of demarcation, which has now developed along the front line, or do i understand it correctly, exactly so then we don't like tomorrow with the use of nuclear weapons, the zaporizhia nuclear power plant was blown up, the crimean titan blew up and has already blown up the kakhovka, and it is possible that there will be new deployments of the army of the corps that has already announced that there will be a new army in july, an additional corps of 2,700 tanks, 4,000 troops is threatening new campaigns against our state and talk yes, you will fail there counteroffensive after that you won't have any chances that's why lukashenka's action once again for

him to voice it himself is already uncomfortable, he voices it because he is completely right and saw what he is like he is so strong that even prigozhin literally destroyed him, but he showed that the regime is a complete failure, that is what we are saying. but karpachenko has an influence on the quality of prigozhyn in such a negotiation process, and lukashenko is happy to try to play a role somewhere . in fact, he is actually an accomplice in tourist operations, he fully supports putin on the territory to carry out operations , to place strategic missiles, supplies putin with tanks, bdr, bmp, and ammunition , he constantly blackmails ukraine, not only that, he lives glory seems to be the peacemaker again and immediately threats to deploy nuclear weapons is a real threat. let's quickly agree if your hint of contrast fails and then there will already be a powerful offensive. no one

will talk . situation we have a single principle and lukashenko let him hear well i know i am giving a principle - it is a principle and there is no right the aggressor who must liberate our territory including crimea is in accordance with all international norms belarus is exactly the same after the collapse of the union, we surrendered the world and in this situation russia is already occupying belarus, let them look at it as they are occupying ukraine. it's just that today there are no weapons , and when the question is too weak to say it will be raised, there will already be a war on the territory of belarus. lukashenko will be destroyed because he is so unnecessary nobody, but today he supports aggression, violation of all principles and no right, i want him to talk about something, about some negotiations, even to engage in aggression, let

him talk about restoring sovereignty of ukraine in accordance with international norms and agreements, which were included even with the great agreement with russia with the knowledge of the borders and the crimea inviolability of ukraine, the prevention of aggression , as it should be provided for, then there may still be some talks, but with the participation of our partners , with the real, so to speak, agreement on the complete defeat of russia, demeritization and according to reparations, these are peace agreements, he is ready to talk like that, and lukashenko is ready according to the fact that he will answer today, he is afraid , on the one hand, they are trying to play along with putin , that he is a peacemaker, on the other hand, there is already the son is in contact with pin mordogan in order to have an indurgent world when it will have already redistributed the situation when russia loses, save me . by the way, mr. general, you mentioned the incident of the provagnerites, who, uh, now some of them are in the territory of belarus, is it true

that lukashenko is talking about prigozhyn in general who is located in the russian federation in st. petersburg, possible in moscow, we will hear what the proclaimed president of the republic of belarus said, a serious student, the fighters of the central military commission wagner are in their camps permanent camps uh, in the techleers, where they were after uh, withdrawal from the front for recovery , treatment, rest, so on, the rotation goes on, usual for such a war, uh, and after the bakhmut artemovsk, they were taken to their camp , that’s where they are today, uh что к соится пригожина, he is in st. petersburg, where he can be in moscow this morning, maybe he went somewhere else, but he is not in the territory of belarus, mr. general. how did you characterize

this triangle prigozhina lukashenko and putin , because in this triangle at least there are two secondly, there is one rebel and why why does this triangle constantly exist and spin? is this a special operation of the federal security service? is this prigozhin who has already lost control over whom they lost control? triangle textbook when he put it rose so to speak against already competitors who give putin gave already you there criticize something google gerasimo because i need to show that uh, accordingly you they

do not fulfill the task and he fulfilled it but fought back not only from putin but from the fsb curator and raised a coup, they turned on everyone in the service showed that he had no chance but gave exit or you agree to the fact that you are retreating and declaring that it was not just a protest action, we remove the question and in fact then we give pensions for many situations, but now wagner is under control, the fsb is under control, and the fsb is being disbanded, they go to contracts , they go to africa, they retire , they go to russia, and if necessary, we will send them to belarus. the structure was taken away by the financial main personal e-e plans of the fact that we still fulfill those promises that returned to him e one trillion rubles in order for him to finance what part they weigh it accordingly

. in africa, it is clear that this format has already gone to hell, putin, why not spin up the situation further, he is right , he is weak even in front of his eh. some kind of support for the given situation. they are trying to tame it, and on the other hand, to control it without perspective will destroy it, but this is the long-term prospects. i did not say that they gave instructions, there were no instructions, putin is raw, but he does it later. it will be due to the analysis there already in the wagner format or in another format, where they meet with gunpowder, let's destroy the firebrand, but it won't happen now, today they give him some field of activity, they returned his weapon, an award that he received even from shoigu and the fsb, that is, in this situation, they play the role of such stabilizer that putin seems to have taken revenge alone well, i think this is temporary because putin is weak, he is trying not to form opposition and

opposition in the army, that's why the soroliks, for example , called the fsb, i questioned the deputy and let him go because they see that there is some kind of condition. there are, accordingly, people there to give instructions to the fsb to conduct very tight control of the bucks minerals of all those who really showed disloyalty there during the puscha period . it is clear. well, and all the original leaders and curators. putin is a beautiful woman from behind lukashenko's control program has nothing to do with it. he was used as a figure. why is he there and says that he is not there? he is there somewhere because he is not a curator, he is not the owner of a beauty, he is a specific performer and a false political figure, but he played a role, as if yes po helped putin. he likes everything. this role is played further because at the moment it is prepared. and what about you? you don’t have to go yet, you can still do it in a different way because of the given situation. everything is

an internal game that is based on contradictions between different towers of the kremlin, respectively, even on the remote control, which showed weakness and putin to some extent plays to stabilize the situation and not aggravate relations because there are many such radicals explained right there in parallel, we remember already lower level but bitterly already convened a conference and demanded the resignation of putin and the carrying out of the next operation that is to replace immediately therefore that putin program thank you mr. general and it was mykola malomuzh former head of the foreign intelligence service of ukraine army general friends we work live on the espresso tv channel as well as on our sites on youtube and on social networks for those who are currently watching us on youtube, please like this video and subscribe to our youtube channel, in addition, take part in our vote, because today we are asking you about whether ukraine needs negotiations

with russia at the moment, 87% of those who took part in this vote said no, 10% say that they are needed well, and 3% have their own opinion, which they express in our comments, and you join in commenting on this survey well, join our sponsor club of the youtube channel and now you will see a qr-code, by clicking on which you will find detailed instructions on how to join our youtube channel to the sponsors of the youtube channel, we will be grateful for any help further , contact us andrii illenko officer of the battalion of the freedom of the fourth brigade of the national guard, the border, mr. andrii. i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on our broadcast . good evening, we are asking our viewers about the negotiations today in connection with the fact that

lukashenko has again started talking about the negotiations about that that it is necessary to start these negotiations as soon as possible because it may be too late for ukraine, do you, as a person who is on the eastern front, generally consider an option such as when ukraine and russia will have to sit down at the negotiating table and on what conditions will these negotiations need to be held? can it be only one negotiations regarding the capitulation of the russian federation in this war, uh, there is absolutely no point in discussing lukashenka's statements because lukashenka is in no way an independent figure and all his words are simply what his master putin dictates to him

and this should be perceived precisely as a broadcast, since putin, it should be analyzed only from the point of view that now russia , including through its puppets, is throwing around the topic of negotiations , which means that things are not going very well for it, to put it mildly. in principle, this is the only news that we can get from this, because today it is obvious and it has been repeatedly stated by the entire political and military leadership of ukraine, no negotiations with the muscovites are possible, while at least one muscovite occupier is on our territory land, and it doesn’t even make sense to talk about it now, it’s not really an absolute story, so everything will be decided on the battlefield, president volodymyr, so that the western weapons supplies allow him to start the offensive much

earlier, uh, zelenskyi says that, unfortunately, not enough of these weapons have arrived, and about by the way, this is evidenced by the study of several institutes of the world economy, they say that the united states of america, germany, and great britain provided ukraine with much less weapons than promised , and the declared amount of new aid is decreasing if you believe these statements of the kila institute of world economy and the complaints of volodymyr zelenskyi, why do you think the western countries have slowed down or not fully provided the help we were counting on, they want ukraine did not win so quickly or did not enter the crimean peninsula so quickly or that ukraine did not hit the territory of russia with these weapons

, what do you think is the logic of this delay? hm . i think the logic of this delay is that there are no western political elites consensus on how they want to see the end of this war, unfortunately, it's true . they have a firm understanding that they are not at least a little bit , so that everyone works, we have a very bad connection , please redial, please andrii illenko andrii illenko officer of the freedom battalion is on the eastern front therefore, forgive me dear tv viewers for such a connection , the general staff temporarily announces that the russian federation is attacking the armed forces of ukraine are advancing on berdyansk and

melitopol in five directions, at the same time the commander of the combined forces of the armed forces of ukraine serhiy naev inspected the borders with belarus in volyn, he said that all police patrols and counter-intelligence units have been transferred to the enhanced mode of combat duty , the number of foot and mobile patrol groups has also been increased, according to the commander of the joint forces, the next training plan in the border areas has already been approved we will hear and see serhiy naiva, work continues on the sections of the state border within the rivne and volyn directions of our boys who are performing tasks in the of the national police, the security service of the national guard is very motivated, all of them have been transferred to the enhanced mode of the nbu, the number of larger and mobile patrols has increased, we are in constant contact with our polish colleagues who are

also taking measures to strengthen the section of the state border of poland with the republic of belarus, every western country should understand that it is ukraine that stands between peaceful life and war mr. andrii, i am addressing andrii ilyenko he should be in touch already good evening once again i'm sorry, we have some problems with the connection, but the viewers are waiting for the continuation. forgive me, half a word broke off during the connection setup. sorry , the connection is really bad, because you understand . i will repeat my opinion among the western political elites, there is plus or minus consensus about the fact that they don't want to allow russia

to win, but they don't have a political consensus on what form ukraine's victory should take, what it should mean, we have this understanding, but they don't have this understanding at the level of consensus and i believe that this is the key reason why there are all the questions about the volume of supplies, about the terms of supplies, and so on. that is, it is exclusively a matter of political goal-setting among the leadership of western states and their understanding of the ultimate goal of the war. therefore, our task is to convey to western societies the western the elites understand that only the complete victory of ukraine, only the liberation of all territories, only the collapse of the russian empire will mean stable peace on the european continent and not only, but under the condition that