[000:00:00;00] in what form the victory of ukraine should be, what should it mean, we have this understanding, but they do not have this understanding at the level of consensus. and i believe that this is the key reason why there are so many questions about the volume of supplies, about the terms of supplies, etc. further that is, it is exclusively a question of political goal-setting among the leaders of western states and their understanding of the ultimate goal of the war, therefore our task is to convey to western society the western elites the understanding that only the complete victory of ukraine is only the liberation of all territory, only the collapse of the russian empire will mean stable peace on the european continent and not only, but the collapse of russia and the russian empire is possible on the condition that they will not be able to use the last

argument that they have been flaunting lately, it is tactical nuclear strategic nuclear weapons, it is obvious that this factor has a rather serious effect on americans and europeans, and as mike pence , a presidential candidate and former vice president of the united states of america, says, in the event of ukraine's defeat against the russian federation, he will have to to fight the americans, therefore, according to him, the united states of america is ready to provide the ukrainians with the means to fight the russians, eh, well, this is the thesis that pence eh is promoting, obviously , so that the united states of america would still provide more weapons and there was a consensus within american society and politicians uh, the military policy of the united states of america, because we know that literally a week ago, trump announced that uh, in

ukraine, there will be no other way out than to sign a peace agreement, because in principle there is no other option and to accept this new territorial the reality that the kremlin insists on, according to you, what can be the last straw when the united states of america and the european countries that are part of the north atlantic alliance, when they say that it is already just an end there is no longer any point in tolerating putin putin is a terrorist murderer and in what way put an end to putin's existence as a creature that poisons everyone's life. i think this will not happen when putin putin commits some uh-horrible crime. and it will happen when the ukrainian army continues to destroy the russian

invaders on the battlefield because they are helping us started when we started to win, when we started to break some scenarios that were painted for us: that kyiv will be captured in three days , that ukraine will be destroyed in a week, and when we showed that we are defending our country, that ukrainians are destroying the enemy on the battlefield, then they began to help us seriously and it will be the same in the future, when it is our turn to inflict defeats on the russian occupier. and this will be inevitable, then the readiness for such actions on the part of the western elites will increase . at the moment, i do not see british intelligence revealed the russian tactics during the counteroffensive of the armed forces of ukraine, they say that russia did not prepare for this offensive of the ukrainian army. in this way , they formed minefields and use anti-tank mines, and there are a lot of these

minefields, and then when armored vehicles enter, they use drones kamikaze attack helicopters, artillery, well, that is, they were preparing for this counteroffensive and had the opportunity to create these redoubts, defensive redoubts, in particular, there is a lot of talk about the southern redoubts there are called the surovikin lines, these are the trenches they dug and they go deep there for 40 km . is the situation the same on the eastern front ? offensive actions , of course, they have for us in fact in many respects from the point of view of the binding military theory of military practice an absolutely

unprecedented character because we use much less aviation and use much less heavy equipment and artillery e-e we carry out offensive operations and destroy the enemy in history in the history of world military theory and military practice, in fact, this is one of the very few largely unprecedented phenomena , and what the ukrainian army is doing at the front now is incredible and these are things that are abundant in why are there no precedents at all in world history now everyone who is involved in this is doing his job just like our battalion is doing our brigade and every ukrainian who is now in the rear he has to do everything in order to help the army and if he himself can also join the army in order to destroy god, everything else is the next and less important. the american edition

of volstack-temps reports that the decision to transfer ukraine to attacks has been agreed upon by everyone and only awaits the approval of biden with the receipt of these weapons, which flies very far and very accurately, eh, according to you , will the nature of the russian-ukrainian war change and what will this give to the armed forces of ukraine, eh, it will definitely change, and the more and the faster we get long-range weapons that will give us the opportunity to harvest enemy calves, to work more effectively against enemy logistics, to destroy the accumulation of enemy troops, the sooner we will complete the tasks before us , serhiy, i am very sorry, i must now be involved somewhat in some processes, which in particular we are talking about now, mr. andrii, thank you thank you for your participation in the program. this was andrii illienko, an officer of the freedom battalion of the fourth brigade of the national guard's operational assignment

, the front line, which is currently located on the eastern front. well, i want to remind you, friends, that during of this program on youtube, we are conducting a survey, we are asking you the following: does ukraine now need to hold talks with russia, since this topic is further torpedoed by those people who are involved or , let's say, affiliated with vladimir putin and lukashenka and other representatives of the countries that are part of conditional group brik and they are talking about the fact that it is necessary to sit down at the negotiating table, the ukrainians must do everything so that russia and ukraine come to an agreement , ukraine is going to counteroffensive, therefore, of course , the question here is quite simple, what do you think about whether

ukraine needs negotiations with russia right now, right now, as a result of the survey that started at the beginning of the program, 86% believe that ukraine does not need any negotiations with russia, 10% say that they do , and 4% have their own opinion, which they leave in our comments. take part in our survey at the end of the program, we will sum up the results of this vote. well, then we will be in touch with dmytro snyiryov, military expert , half-chairman of the public initiative right matters, mr. dmytro. congratulations and thank you for joining our broadcast. congratulations. thank you for invitation mr. dmytro over the past few weeks, we have heard about the difficult situation around the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, that the russians were going to blow up the zaporizhia npp, the head of the main directorate of intelligence, kyrylo budanov

, now believes that the threat of a catastrophe at the zaporizhia npp is currently decreasing, he said in an interview with the times, budenov did not give specific reasons for such a conclusion , but said that certain public and non-public actions in this area led to this. the act of terrorism at the zaporizhia npp has it already passed ? after all, we always need to prepare for the worst in the performance of the russian occupiers . of the protest to get tense let's start actually, how many events are actually taking place, about which the emotion tells us about the fact that

not a single statement of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense was confirmed by our strategic partners, or even more so, they were all denied, at least the statement will be taken on the irradiation of the equipment actually about the divo coolers, the statement of the mgt on june 15 was not clear about how the naming is not mentioned, later a statement by gurmova appears on the fact that four power units were mined zaporizhzhia 4:6 the next day, the representative of the united states, kirby, comes out and declares that the united states is monitoring the situation around zaporizhzhia , there is no information about the mining of the object. confirm and now regarding the information that is voiced because given that the degree of tension fell, on the contrary, i explain why the russians artificially raised the degree of tension

in memory of that, they set a deadline, i gave that number about the representatives of rosa tam and others about the possibility of striking on the territory of the zaporizhzhia npp, the ukrainian side in particular considered three scenarios , the first - this is shelling actually with high-precision use of high-precision weapons of my beginning , so that everything about attacks oh, i'm sorry, god bless , the second scenario - the possibility of resetting on power unit of an explosive substance with the appropriate elements of spent nuclear fuel and the third possibility of a strike using a motor vehicle point in donetsk damage up to 120 km and on the 5th, when the whole world froze in anticipation of possible scenarios from the russian side , the eternally young, eternally drunk dmytro medveev appears, who says that there are currently two scenarios for the end of the war, the first is

the conclusion of the so-called peace agreements on the russian exclusively plan, that is, according to the bear, ukraine should make concessions on territorial issues, and this is also the russian status crimea well, accordingly, the territories that are currently occupied by the russian federation and the second plan is a nuclear strike, and medvedev specifies even the number of victims , drawing historical parallels, three hundred thousand e-e died as a result of e-e inflicting nuclear strikes on hiroshima on gazan about which degree reduction it is said that if the russian scenario was followed, the russian federation, i apologize , went on the contrary to increase the degree of tension using the so-called nuclear rhetoric

on the very day when provocations on zaporizhzhia npp, in general, someone in the gur is analyzing the situation that is happening and serhiy , the chairman, dear society, is visiting the zaporizhia npp today. of a special military operation is that a coincidence of circumstances through glyagur explains the fourth number will attract statements about the possibility of provocation on the zf by ukraine the fifth statement the visit of the sixth bear, accordingly, is already kyrieka and this is on the eve of the summit, the attacks will be made without exaggeration, fateful decisions for the ukrainian side, that is, this is about the fact that the russian federation has moved from blackmail regarding the blow-up of the zaporizhia npp to

direct nuclear blackmail of western countries with the aim of making military-technical cooperation impossible with ukraine in the ukraine-nato format and , accordingly, to block the issue of ukraine's possible accession to nato, that is , it is not about any lowering of rates, on the contrary, i wanted to ask look, you are talking about the fact that russia went to raise rates, they are constantly raising rates, and somewhere the ceiling of those rate increases is still over, that is, they have been thundering tactical nuclear weapons for a long time, and dmitry medvedev once talked about it , so he said about the fact that america, in order to stop the war from japan, they threw rockets at hiroshima and nagasaki, this is how they put an end to this war, but in this situation, the americans fought the japanese with

the aggressors. and the story was completely the opposite that is, in this situation, the aggressor who attacked ukraine threatens to drop a nuclear weapon, a nuclear bomb. that is, well, if we extrapolate to the events of 1945, it is as if the union threw nuclear missiles at the united states of america, isn't the same medvedev and putin afraid that something like this can happen in the reverse order but not from the side of ukraine, of course, because we do not have nuclear weapons, asbek from the west, two questions were issued, let's give portraits of the first reason for the historical parallels. i would like to remind that on september 30, 22 the moment when the occupied territories of ukraine became part of the russian federation, because the dictator then says that the countries from the west opened pandora's box at one time and gives

just the example of hiroshima and nagasaki - this is the first , and the second speaks of, respectively , the striking of e-e allied aviation during the second world war of world war i, this is the free cities of germany, and i will remind the audience when the allied air force struck in the 43rd year over the hydraulic structures on the german river new yoma, which led to the death of up to five thousand civilians, yes, mr. sergey, the danger lies in the fact that the corresponding parallels were drawn . the coincidence, let's say, of historical parallels and the corresponding steps

of the russian federation. and you know, i'm done. i'm sorry. and when everyone, including the military and political leaders of ukraine, is surprised about the weakness and reaction from the west, i 'll remind you of putin's words in order to speak you have no moral right to save us, that is why the west is silent and practically swallowed the detonation of the hydroelectric power plant. there is no reality, and regarding the possibility of nuclear strikes, let's remember again the position of the west if there is an attack on the territory of ukraine, it prays for the use of nuclear tactical weapons , but what will the military respond to jects of the russian federation, first of all, it is possible that the black sea fleet of mr. we will be warm that the muscovites will be deprived of the black sea court if strikes are made on conditional two

ukrainian cities with the use of nuclear works is a symmetrical answer. what do you think? i think that the symmetrical answer to what russia is doing at the moment was the general destruction of those who terrorize the whole world, because the whole world is not negotiating with terrorists , because their answer is quite simple: putin medvedev and lukashenko are their henchmen, these people must be destroyed because they are blackmailing and terrorizing the whole world in the first place. it is hard to imagine that in another era someone seized a nuclear power plant and blackmailed it for a year and a half. well, imagine that the taliban or someone there would buy some nuclear power plant the power plant is interesting because

they lived from the moment they captured it until the moment it was absolutely destroyed. in general, they raise nuclear rhetoric, and perhaps dmitry in this situation, i mean the west , still leave a window for themselves for negotiations with putin and still try in some way to help him derail this situation because well, suddenly in a year or a year and a half we will have to sit down at the negotiating table to press the fish to vladimir putin , all the more so let's look at the horizontal bar fish that was able to, do you remember when the thesis was thrown that we helped you with armaments, but unfortunately the pace of the ukrainian counterattacks are quite slow, so the possibility of a so-called peaceful victory is not ruled out, this thesis was calculated

literally, and mr. serhiy, let's look at the events that take place with military-technical assistance to the armed forces the issue of ukraine, even the training of ukrainian pilots on the f16 has been postponed by a month, it’s not that even the provision of 16, which forced the brave man to come out and say directly, you are forcing us to attack without cover from the air, it’s hard to imagine and pure praise it was the brave man who found the courage to call a spade a spade, and then the rhetoric on the part of western countries, and first of all, the military leadership of these countries, has fundamentally changed ; everyone understands very well that there really cannot be a successful offensive even with minimal numbers equipment and the complete lack of cover from the air. because it was the western countries that did not give the opportunity to carry out this counteroffensive in those

volumes and in those time intervals that were planned by the ukrainian headquarters. by the way, mr. dmitry, about possible separate negotiations or negotiations that could precede some major negotiations e tv channel, with reference to its sources, published information about the fact that former officials connected in the state of america . cite specific facts, of course, the russian foreign ministry denies it, says that lavrov has not contacted anyone, what do you think, who should be trusted more , nbc news or lavrov's department

? first of all, evidence of so-called active operations, that is, miscalculation of certain tests, well, let's call things by their names, disinformation for the purpose of forming public opinion, that is, they are again promoting the thesis about the possibility of clandestine agreements behind ukraine's back, but mr. serhiy, the main thesis is the very possibility of these so-called peaceful victories, let's in this context even think about the reality and sencher about providing ukraine with a security guarantee, and moreover, joining nato . but what is the price of the russian status of crimea , random song absolutely not, and let's remember that similar statements are being made by the activity of the so-called peacekeepers , starting with the president of brazil, the papal union, the leaders of papua new guinea, and who

he did not come to us there, plus the representatives of the people's republic of china with their plan for the settlement of sergei are trying well, someone is trying to break us and imprison the victory table on july 11-12 in vilnius. in kyiv want to receive from nato members if we do not receive this positive signal, what will it mean for ukraine and what will it mean for russia and what will it mean for the world well, i am different from bohdan, who commented on me, i received a collective signal, i will still adhere to the regime of information hygiene and silence. let's comment with you on the results of this summit after its end. i repeat once again that any

information currently can harm the nature of the negotiation process, including e- well, let's say that raising the level of expectation in ukrainian society is absolutely the same as throwing in theses about possible so-called betrayal or despair of western partners at the moment of military-technical cooperation with ukraine has statements from western nato countries that indicate that ukraine will at least be satisfied with the only one i can assume will pray for the possibility of a so-called strategic partnership, that is, direct agreements between ukraine and key nato countries at the time of military-technical cooperation , that is, the same the status of a strategic partner , which allows you to receive permanent military and technical assistance

. independence from a change in the administration of the united states is an example of cooperation in the united states , with egypt, israel, taiwan, japan, and there are many examples, if it happens, it will be a victory, let's write your names on july 6 volodymyr zelenskyi will visit bulgaria and have a meeting in the czech republic. on july 7 , he will meet with the president of turkey rzep and ip erdoğan among the issues of zelenskyi's meeting with the turkish leader is the continuation of the grain agreement, which by the way is coming to an end on july 17, according to you, can zelensky in this case count on the support of turkey, including in the promotion of ukraine's interests in the north atlantic alliance, or

negotiations or, let's say, good relations endogana with putin shows that turkey will not be the country that will very actively promote ukrainian interests in the north atlantic alliance, the opinion is there that ukraine is a cardigan, the more he is an economic nationalist, he exclusively defends the interests of turkey. and if it is beneficial to turkey , he will accordingly adopt certain features if the functioning of the grain corridor is beneficial to turkey, then according to the first one , the interests of the same rna are lobbied, because they work accordingly . well, let's say, they rise in the turkish economy at the expense of the russian federation. by the way, i do not rule out the coordination of the actions of the russian federation with turkey at the moment . let's say a certain blocking of the grain corridor, but to talk about the fact that turkey will defend the position of ukraine in the miracle of joining nato, well, this will worsen the relations of the russian federation

, according to putin and let's talk about that and let's see how erdoğan's meeting with representatives of the united states will end regarding sweden's actual membership in nato, it will be indicative, then we can make assumptions regarding turkey's possible support of our north atlantic and well, let's say the course well, sweden's own question regarding nato membership has not yet been resolved. finland is already a member of the north atlantic alliance, but both and those states received guarantees, personal guarantees of individual members of the north atlantic alliance on the way to joining nato can there be such an option in ukraine , this is exactly what is being said for the transition period, and finland received a security guarantee from the leading nato countries, it is

primarily about a nuclear umbrella, clearly declared that finland will not have any problems with the russian federation, there were none if such guarantees are given to us, there are no questions , this is the best guarantee, but mr. sergey , in my opinion, in the language of conviction, the best guarantee of national security is the restoration of the country's nuclear status, the more the opportunity and technical and economic. we have and need to say more. this is a separate conversation . vilnius will be able to agree on such commitments to ukraine that will not disappoint it. well, let's hope and already comment on the consequences of the summit in vilnius, what we will get as a result . thank you, mr. dmytro , for participating in the program. by the way, friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel

, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live on youtube and facebook, please like this video to promote it respectively, in the trends of youtube and facebook well, join our sponsor club of youtube channel espresso by following this qr-code you can find detailed instructions on how to join our sponsor club any help from you is helpful for youtube channel espresso it will allow us to develop new projects well, please don't forget that in addition to television and a youtube channel, we also have a wonderful website espresso tv , by going to this address from preso tv you can find detailed information and complete news of ukraine, the world, front-line chronicles, everything is on our website espresso tv, we work for you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

. come in, please , support our resources on this, friends. you to the next program , goodbye from london on the air wedding from ukraine i am yevgenia shidlovska and today we are talking about the consequences of the russian missile attack on lviv they attacked with calibers they hit a residential building why are the russians hitting the the rear and how the tactics of their strikes changed in general on the night of thursday, the russian military hit the lviv region with missiles, as reported by the ukrainian air force, the russians