[000:00:00;00] places will be struck by the means we are talking about. i have hope and otakams and cluster bombs. well, we are also stocking up our reserve, including artillery shells. and only after that it is advisable to interrupt the second and second line of defense . first of all, it is strong, because the subjects are equipped there, and concrete coatings and our anti-tank ditches er-er means stronger mining there and their reserves there, that is, in order to stop our advance along the first line, they incarnately strike in groups of anti-tank artillery and infantry reserves, that is, in the direction where we are advancing, i and you listed these berdyansk, melitopol, er, vasylivka , for example. they are like that from the second line

, they throw these reserves there, but they are melting. kontinentalnye vot and this is good, that is, in this way, attacks are carried out, but i want to draw attention to the fact that we are still applying more to our aviation, let the numerical comparison with them and artillery strikes and those rockets and groans be small. thank you to the british the next time they gave me is wearing me in depth, that is, such preparation is going on. and after these deliveries take place, it means that a decision will be made on which directions to concentrate everything that will be accumulated for the current month, in my opinion, and then after the corresponding strikes. our reserves will be concentrated there. well, at least operational level for moving forward and breaking through, let's say, the enemy's defense system . okay, then i have one more question, and it

concerns the sea of ​​azov, and intelligence intelligence today in the report noted that russia is gaining a foothold in the sea of ​​azov, and at the beginning of july this year even a naval base was opened in mariupol and what now if earlier they launched missiles of that caliber there only from the black sea over ukraine, now they will do it from the azov seas, well, it looks like russia is not wasting time and is arming itself as much as possible, but now you can see that even the sea of ​​azov will be used , so it is necessary to leave the illusion of what someone tried to do there at the beginning of the war that we will now count their missiles, they are a limited number, they are running out and we will wipe our hands, this is the wrong approach , first of all, they have already used a large number of them in such quantities, they are not renewing a month, modern missiles of various

types from 30 to 60, not yet the current time that’s why there is no adoption of new technology, they gave what we compared with tanks , but those tanks that are the same as the russians. yes , there are such data further, but these are the tanks that if they were now in service near the urals for a day in the distant there are thousands of old tanks in the east which can be collected simply there, out of five, you can collect one, then restore it, and so on . that is, they still have, i emphasize, thousands of tanks, that is, so that there is also no illusion about this, now with an air unit that they will attack us on ukraine and on i emphasize this to the entities on the territory of ukraine and to our troops, when they advance in the south , very active actions and aviation , including their other means and unmanned aerial vehicles and missiles, this should be kept in

mind one way - this is anti-aircraft anti-missile defense which we strengthen but slowly, i.e. near kiev, a large number of shaheds were destroyed, probably yes there 100%, and to the west when they passed the cruise missiles , you see, only seven of the 10 failed because there are not enough means, even non-proto-missile ones, such as petriv, in fact, franko himself, italian ones, and even old ones soviet or some capable of shooting down pedestrians and these missiles, we need a quantity to gain mass to gain such that we can carry out the task, this is the first way, and the second way is to return to the calibers of the sea of ​​azov, so the second way is necessary to destroy before the missile is launched launchers on land as if from kandera er ships must be destroyed you say the bases must be struck why do we

need these and strike at their naval bases on their ships without a doubt and there the allies say on our territory occupied, so there should be no questions here even before they launch , that is, ships, missile launchers, boats , submarines, bases, purely related to calibers, and we also need to hit the airfield, well, it is difficult to hit in the air , because we must have many complexes in this action, and they can be destroyed on long-range approaches, precisely aviation, which they do not give us now. these are the approaches, thank you very much for your comment, uh, we were contacted by igor romanenko, a military expert , lieutenant general of the reserve. thank you very much. well, in these minutes, volodymyr zelenskyi is obviously on his way to istanbul or already in istanbul itself, we will now monitor how

the events will develop literally live, and the day before i will remind you that his visit to prague took place in the czech republic and we already mentioned the new military aid package for ukraine from the czech republic but what else was the ukrainian delegation able to agree on with a visit with a visit in prague? my colleague sashko shevchenko is joining our broadcast . today was already the second day of this visit, and it started today with the meeting of volodymyr zelenskyi with the prime minister of the czech republic , petr fiala, the talks actually covered a lot of topics, from the issue of defense cooperation to the involvement of the czech business in the reconstruction of ukraine, but one of the main topics was also the nato summit in vilnius, which should start already next week. petr fiala expressed his hope that zelensky will come to the capital of lithuania in person, and

the president of ukraine once again stated that he expects only only general fragments . and here is some specific content regarding the prospects of ukraine's membership in the fetre fiala alliance. during the press conference that took place today, several times he acknowledged ukraine's progress in reforms and especially emphasized because the country manages to fight corruption even during a full-scale war , and because, as fiala says, ukraine is already worthy of joining nato, but we still have to wait for the victory. the czech republic has never been repeated in europe. the czech republic will do everything for this and help convince the rest of the countries to help ukraine on its way and help with key reforms in prague. volodymyr zelenskyy spoke

mostly about cooperation in the defense sphere for example, yesterday the president of the czech republic, peter pavel, announced that since the beginning of the armed aggression of the russian federation, the czech republic has provided military aid to ukraine in the amount of 45 billion czech crowns, which is approximately equal to 2 billion us dollars, and today the prime minister of the czech republic, petros fiala, also mentioned how much various weapons, and in particular heavy ones, provided the czech republic to ukraine he even said that on average the czech republic provides 10,000 ammunition or one tank each day . the press conference today began with the signing of a memorandum on cooperation in the field of defense between the ministry itself of defense of the czech republic and the ministry of strategic industries of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi emphasized that ukraine not only receives military aid from the czech republic, but also cooperates with it in the production of weapons and ammunition, many journalists in the czech republic were also interested in how much more the war in ukraine is going on and how it might end similar questions were heard in this case both yesterday when

zelenskyi met with president pavel and today in the government building after the meeting of the ukrainian delegation with czech government officials on led by prime minister fiala, i suggest you listen to what zelensky said about the possible end of the war in ukraine, what is victory, what is the end of the war, and probably, it depends on many things, from the losses, there are people who have lost their homes, there are people who have lost their loved ones, and i really want this the victory was not for one category of people, but for it to really be for everyone, and that is why it is so important that the territorial integrity and sovereignty of ukraine be restored. well, at the end of his visit to the czech republic, volodymyr zelenskyi also held meetings with the chairman of the senate and the chamber of deputies, and after that he went to slovakia

. as you already know, the president met the president with zana chaputova. it is already known that slovakia will provide 16 more zyuzana self-propelled artillery units, and the countries also agreed on the joint development of a new type of howitzers. well, in the evening they are waiting for zelensky in istanbul, and so far it seems that this is zelenskyi's last foreign visit before the nato summit in vilnius. but maybe there will be some changes in this regard. everything is fine with me, sashko . there is still saturday and sunday ahead. therefore, there may be more hey, several countries volodymyr zelensky will have time to visit, i'll take it easy. thank you very much, sashka shevchenko, we were talking about the results of volodymyr zelensky's visit to the czech republic. well, now it's official volodymyr zelensky will come to the nato summit in vilnius on july 11-12 , the head of the north atlantic alliance announced today jan stoltenberg he said that at the alliance summit in vilnius, the leaders will adopt a package regarding ukraine that will contain three main elements

. listen. i expect that the leaders of the alliance member countries will agree on a slightly rapprochement of ukraine to nato, firstly, we will agree on a multi-year aid package to ensure full interoperability between the ukrainian armed forces and nato, secondly, we will strengthen our political ties by starting the nato ukraine council, and thirdly, i expect that our leaders will confirm that ukraine will become a member of nato and will unite to bring ukraine closer to its goal. well, you yourself , nato in vilnius, i remind you, there are only four days left, and the allies still haven't decided exactly what to offer ukraine to ukraine. at least the washington post writes about it. kyiv hopes that the nato leaders in vilnius next week will be the decisive moment. when ukraine will finally receive a clear signal that it will eventually join the alliance and this will secure it in the security infrastructure of the west . well, it will send a clear signal to moscow, but a few days before the arrival of nato leaders in

the capital of lithuania, it is still not clear what options ukraine will be left with if its hopes are not fulfilled, the allies are still negotiating what exactly to offer to kyiv writes the washington post, the biden administration writes the publication tried to shift the discussion towards long-term security packages as an alternative to accelerated membership, the united states also previously supported a plan that allows ukraine to bypass the pdc, but did not actually set a time frame. the washington post means that almost any result except for the alliance itself an immediate invitation to join nato can leave ukraine in almost the same uncertain position in which it found itself after the summit in bucharest in 2008. well, i will also add that in the interview for the times literally two days ago, the head of the main intelligence department, kyrylo budanov, said that the results of the nato summit in vilnius, they say, will disappoint ukrainians , according to budanov

, some words will be announced at the summit, as he said, but nothing more, this is literally a quote. well, diplomat oleksandr hara, an expert, joins our broadcast on issues of foreign security policy of the center for defense strategies e good evening good evening oleksandr how did you understand this statement by jens stoldenberg that the nato summit will be expressed at the summit support for ukraine in three directions, he said the increase in the level of political cooperation, then in particular it is about the establishment of the ukraine nato council, the approval of a multi-year support program and confirmation that ukraine has the prospect of becoming a member of nato. well, there are so many different words , but i did not understand the main thing. does this mean that ukraine will receive a political invitation in nato or how to understand it differently well, i think that the intrigue remains because certain actions are being carried out, that is, now there is still time for

negotiations and ukraine is exerting a certain pressure that is exactly why the president of ukraine went to central european countries and will also visit turkey in order to receive a certain signal. i understand that these countries are not . every vote of nato members well, actually, that's why these signals are very important now. and i would certainly also like to see a not new such diplomatic envelope in bucharest itself in 2008, but there is really a clear signal in them not only that the door of nato open and that ukraine will become a member of nato, we are absolutely satisfied with the wording after the ukrainian victory. and do you see any signs that ukraine, uh, that the declaration itself will have this wording

? as you just voiced. other restraining factors, they act primarily on washington well, accordingly, other countries are oriented towards the eighth blood . sweden, which cannot join, that is, it hangs between the status of a neutral country and a member of nato, that's why i hope, of course, that we as a society, we as ukraine as the government and our real allies are still informal within nato, they will be able to convince the americans, let's say so that one should not make a mistake because a repetition of bucharest will mean to everyone that at least a little but putin has achieved his goal that he has a certain informal legal but it is not an expansion and you will never say that it will not accept ukraine because

it will contradict the un charter. i apologize for that here in nato of course they will always say about opening the door and of course they always have the opportunity to talk about certain procedures certain standards and actually now the president of the united states uses this argument and says that ukraine must go through all these necessary steps and there will not be any short-cut but you you know, all this also depends on political will . hungary itself is a question regarding it. as for incompetence, so is the rule of law and democracy in that country, and i am not saying that. i am not saying that it is not ukraine, but they are saying the european union and accordingly, they use certain means to influence hungary, there are non-military states, and germany itself, sorry, it was not there. they started to give us help, they realized how much they neglected their own security and their obligations in relation to central eastern europe, and now i am trying

to make up for it, i.e. in principle, we have arguments as to why ukraine should receive this signal oleksandr i guess maybe i was wrong, but i noticed that you partially contradict yourself , you initially said that after all, well, formally it is believed that all countries there are equal and have the same vote, but then you said that , after all, the majority of nato is oriented towards the united states, and the united states has not yet shown any such obvious leadership in the issues of the prospects of ukraine's membership in nato. well, you know this is a formula for the universal patriarchy so that the first among equals of course every vote weighs something but we have an extremely positive result 22 countries formally announced that they support the membership and want that the membership of ukraine of course and want er

the neighbors of the baltic countries of poland, romania, and there with big bills, and the same finland, ah, they understand the danger of the russian federation. of course, they would like to have such a powerful military player and a player in the heads of nato in order to restrain the russian federation, but now we are our contribution to european security is that we have put all our forces on ourselves and the russian federation cannot do anything serious anywhere. and secondly, we do not actually reject its aggressive potential, if not for 10 years, then at least for five, and this is won time to be the europeans nevertheless sped up and began to produce those weapons, ammunition, ammunition that are needed in order to , well, let's say, show their readiness to defend their lifestyle from the russian federation, respectively, not to give russia an excuse to start a war

against a member state nato, look in the interview for secrets. i have already quoted the head of the intelligence department, kyrylo budanov , who said that the results of the summit will disappoint ukrainians, first of all. secondly, and if this is so, then why is volodymyr zelenskyi going there ? it was said earlier in the bank that if there are no significant significant results, then zelenskyi will not go there, he is going there to be disappointed, or after all, or after all, it is not worth believing to the end because what budanov says. perhaps there will not be only disappointment. well, you know, we have the usual maximalist position. i mean like our government. yes, the ukrainian expert community and ukrainian society that we deserve a signal, we do not say that 13 must

be accepted immediately and we do not say that -e means nato member states should immediately enter the war with the russian federation. of course, a clear signal is needed that will show that the russian right of veto does not work and, of course, that this will be an additional signal to moscow that what it has not done is how many territories it has not captured and temporarily does not hold this will not mean that it can stop the entry of ukraine into nato. yes , of course, if there is no clear language not just diplomatic karberans. on the other hand, there is another very positive part, which is offered to us in vilnius. i hope that it will be legally binding, let's say, like the promise of the monkeys to help ukraine strengthen our defense capabilities. i know that the ukrainian

side conveyed to its partners a vision of our forces, that is, some capabilities. in order to protect ourselves now , to liberate our territory, and, accordingly, in the future to deter russian aggression and actually, therefore, this package that is being offered to us, i hope it will meet those needs which are in ukraine, well, and the second. well, of course. this format of the council of ukraine of nato is an interesting format. i want to remind you that before the large-scale invasion, such a format existed in the russian federation. and we were only satisfied with the observer's seat in nato. has changed, russia has actually lost such and such an opportunity for cooperation with nato , but by and large we will look at that toolkit at such opportunities that these new council, the newly created council will give us , because of course we do not want to just be

present at the meetings but not have the right to vote or at least in some way not to consult with us, i.e. of course, everything will depend on how this agreement or a package of agreements under the agreement has the support of ukraine , which we really need, why we will be in nato or not and actually as a council as a tool to bring us closer to nato as a tool to listen to us more than it was before february 24 last year and the ukrainian government in principle has no illusions and ukrainian society i think too everyone understands that uh membership in nato is impossible for ukraine as long as the war continues, but ukraine, if ukraine expects to join nato after the end of the war and if the best scenario comes true and ukraine receives this political invitation after the end of the war, then a logical question arises . what will nato consider the end of the war? it's difficult to say well, first of all, there were certain trial layers of certain western analysts that

let's do it, now you are somehow there with russia stop this war and what russia bought , well, if it is, we will not admit it but it will somehow be under their control, but in the end we are in the territory of my guarantee there of the fifth article, that is, i don't think that it was there from the white house, such a survey of public opinion or the ukrainian government was launched, but they tried to probe that from the great oleksandr, it is possible i will clarify this is the german scenario. so when during the cold war one part of germany was in nato and the other was not , something like this is proposed. conducted a survey that more than 80% of ukrainian citizens said that they do not agree to peace through territorial concessions. and thank god that ukrainian society understands

that this kind of peace is only a truce before another big war, and a lasting peace can be ruled out when we we will liberate all the territories. but in any case, it seems to me that this is the most optimal scenario. i hope we will get to it. it will be after the defeat in ukraine . the return of crimea is particularly important. i am absolutely sure that those negative trends within the russian federation will intensify and something may happen to mr. putin, whether this is natural or someone will help him somewhere or a struggle for power will begin, because such a defeat always causes such processes that are centrifugal and the struggle for power, and then a window of opportunity has opened for us and become a member. by the way, this probably happened with finland, and since this country was ready, it is actually completely compatible with nato, and while putin was

in ukraine, he fought with us or is still fighting with us in finland realized that this is their, uh, stellar chance to escape from the gray zone of danger and become a member of 30, the first member of nato. freedom on the internet and support our work in this way , like this broadcast and until monday i have a 20% discount on tempalgin tablets in pharmacies

. there are a lot of us allergens in the world austria, you don't need to get sick austria is a healthy remedy for allergies exclusively in plantain events the most important events events that are happening right now and affect our lives of course the news feed reports about them, but you don't know much about what is happening, you need to understand antin borkovskii and invite experts soberly evaluate events, analyze them, modeling our near future, every saturday at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10:00 p.m., studio event with anton borkovskii nayspresso about so that ukrainians don't think about so that they don't talk first

war is still out, war is our victory, only on espresso from monday to monday , completely different spheres of human activity, sports , health, politics, the return of crimea, military analytics, nine presenters, journalists , experts, opinion leaders in real time about the most current events through the prism of war in author's projects on espresso de-occupation and how can you live now without stopping, you can incomparably the history of the liberated cities of ukraine have gone let's see how our brothers helped us freed a normal life freed the normal equipment of the pro-russian inhumans was terrible, it was very scary every day. one by one, two houses were burned, and the ukrainian people were nazis here. yes, we are here. we are all nationalists. people who resisted. residents came here, stopped them and sent them back and

became heroes. the novel was and will always be ukraine about unbreakable . cities of ukraine from the ukraine project in the de-occupation documentary cycle every saturday at 11:10 a.m. on espresso with you vitaliy portnikov and we will discuss the main events of this week vitaliy portnikov and top experts about the brightest events for the last seven days, our guest will be the generator of satellite forces, the former national security adviser to the president of the united states, donald trump, herbert mcmaster, yuriemsya, current topics , pressing questions, authoritative comments and forecasts in the project , an informational marathon with vitaly portnikov every sunday at 8:10 p.m. on espresso, every week saturday political club helps to understand the processes that happening in ukraine and the world vitaliy portnikov host of espresso and invitation experts based on facts give their assessment

and forecast of the development of events want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow see the saturday political club that saturdays are not espresso ru hello this is freedom morning informational project radio freedom top guests every day this is the shipping district of kherson turn on live we are somewhere in the vicinity of bakhmut tell the main thing on weekdays at 9:00 i congratulate this week we have such you know the dense accumulation of lies from the russian ministry of attack, and it lies in such a way that, well, every day can be considered as a separate such case

. i already told you yesterday, now the occupiers are digging in even deeper and we are talking about an attack on lviv . the enemy of the attack on the strategic reserve was western military equipment and militants on the territory of the academy of ground forces in lviv, the attack with a high-precision weapon was carried out on the park zone of the academy where it was located armored vehicles of western production with a high degree of probability , including british challenger tanks