[000:00:00;00] agreement agreement, is there a chance to continue what are the positions of the parties, what is known now does not work , e.e. for the last two weeks, not a single ship has entered the black sea, and only eight or nine ships have left from odesa, e.e. southern is generally blocked, chornomorsk is absolutely nothing that is, the russian side has been entering for a long time through this coordination center , does not allow the passage of ships, does not conduct inspections , and this will cause us big problems. negotiations we will see how far we can achieve this and i cannot say that it is in the interests of turkey and ukraine and many countries in the world to continue this grain corridor, and if the aggressor country does not agree to its extension, we must look for a literary version. i think that for activation vasyl bodnar, the ordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine in turkey, was our guest, we actually talked about the release of ukrainian commanders who were in turkey

for 10 months and whether the grain corridor has a chance to work again, i will remind you watch svoboda ranok and then don't miss this on our air zelenskyy has not yet decided whether oil will go to the summit in vilnius, the alliance state meanwhile is frantic, this is a direct quote, they are preparing a decision on security guarantees for ukraine politico writes so what to expect from events that can change the world bayten will discuss with sunak the security of providing ukraine with a set of ammunition . let's talk on the air, then likes in the comments and sharing are traditionally welcome, and i also invite you to subscribe to the youtube channel of radio liberty. and if you haven't done it yet, it's interesting that the experts of the american institute for the study of war analyzed 500 days of the full-scale

invasion of russia into ukraine and came to the conclusion that during this time russia did not achieve any of the set goals, analysts emphasize that the ukrainian military, thanks to its resistance , was able to stop the offensive on kyiv and liberate several areas that were initially full-scale the invasion was occupied by russian troops. currently, the armed forces of ukraine have secured the initiative and are carrying out counteroffensive actions along most of the front line, at the same time, russian forces are almost completely focused on trying to hold the captured territories , according to the report of the american institute for the study of war, analysts note that the counteroffensive actions which conducting the armed forces conducting the armed forces is happening slowly, but the ukrainian forces are doing it on purpose in order to exhaust the russian military and at the same time preserve the ukrainian combat power, meanwhile, the american newspaper lostar journal, referring to the lieutenant colonel of ukraine oleg talegin, writes that the ukrainian forces are now focused on displaced and russian forces from fortifications and minefields, the depth of which in some areas of the occupied territory exceeds

24 km. president of ukraine volodymyr zelensky suggested that russian president putin will to start negotiations when the defense forces of ukraine reach crimea, he told about this in an interview with the american television and radio company abc news, answering the question whether it is really possible to force putin go to negotiations, well, this is completely understandable logical rhetoric that at the moment when ukraine reaches the administrative border with the temporarily occupied crimea, it is very likely that putin will be forced to seek a dialogue with the civilized world, in contrast to how it was before a full-scale invasion, because he will be weakened. in an interview, zelenskyi does not deny the recent reports of the american edition of the wall street journal that ukrainian officials told cia director william burns that this was the goal ukrainian counteroffensive, i will remind, referring to an anonymous american official, the publication reported that at the beginning of june, the director of the cia, vilyanberts, visited kyiv , and ukrainian officials said that ukraine plans to return a large part

of the occupied territory to the osen, move artillery and missile systems near the admin-counter-admin line of the border with crimea and advance further to the east of ukraine after that , for the first time since march of last year, to start negotiations with moscow in our place tonight in the temporarily occupied janko and what in crimea an explosion rang out, the crimean veter telegram channel reported about it the day before, i reported on an explosion in the area of ​​the crimean bridge, the occupation authorities announced the work of the air defense forces, and the occupation head of crimea serhiy aksyonov reported only that the air defense forces shot down the missile without additional details, in turn, the main joint intelligence published the mysterious the video with a countdown, well, it lasts a minute on the video frame of the combat operations, the ukrainian military who shoot and raise drones into the air, most of them have their faces covered now, you can see fragments of this video a warning message from the band appears on the screen at the end of the video, i am quoting verbatim, the time of retribution has come, what exactly they are hinting at the main intelligence department is still

unknown on this issue, we will try to actually start our communication with oleksandr kovalenko in the military audience of the information resistance group, he joins our broadcast i congratulate good morning , what can they hint at in the main intelligence agency, the time of retribution has come? and what will he look like, let's put it this way. i have no idea how he can look really, i know that kirilo budonov it would be better for you to call him er dueter and the fact is that today there are indeed some scenarios for the liberation of our territories and both mainland and non-mainland, that is, i mean the peninsula definitely well, everything is clear and which the scenarios themselves are another issue and it is, let’s say, more uh-uh unpredictable, and because we saw, for example, in 2022 and 2023 that the liberation of our

territories actually took place according to completely different scenarios, completely different sequence of actions, i.e. how was the liberation of the north, how was the liberation of the right-bank kherson region, kharkiv region, it is all different from how the process of liberation of the zaporizhia region and donetsk region is currently taking place . so, what could be behind this video ? this is not foreseen even for the majority of analysts. please tell me about the explosions in crimea, they are happening again , the occupation authorities and anonymous telegram channels are reporting on them hmm who is working who is working let's say yes in crimea if it is possible paint the issue and how threatening it is for the occupying power, how it can scare the occupying power or not , have they come to terms with it, are they used to it , what can we say about the occupying

power in this context, and what interests do they have other than the defendants on the bench itself defendants and they don't solve any global issues , it's mostly criminal authorities , criminal representatives of criminal structures who , er, are engaged now as in the last time although and why as in the last time, they are engaged in the redistribution of the budget and the possibilities of what is possible to steal and so on and so on and so on and so on and so on and so forth and because they understand that one way or another after a certain period of time they will have to flee and as for the general voters , they may be of different categories, this may be an external influence, i.e. something has flown into the territory of crimea from where, and the second type of voters is when internal processes take place. i mean, for example , partisan movements as an option, because we see that

there is quite serious opposition on the mainland of ukraine, in the kherson region, in the zaporizhia region, in melitopol from time to time and in berdyansk is blown up by a car with some collaborator, why can't there be such a resistance movement on the temporarily occupied crimea peninsula? yes, it is . well, the third option is generally the most interesting. i would say that's the funniest. why? the crimean peninsula became a transit zone for the transportation of a large number of forces and means of logistical support for the russian occupiers, the accumulation of this mtz on the territory of the peninsula, sometimes it is stored well, let's say that not quite satisfactory conditions with the corresponding needs for security equipment, so sometimes it is not surprising that it happens, but it explodes on its own . oleksandr, in fact, the deputy minister

of defense, hanna malyar, actually confirmed the strikes on the crimean bridge when he was walking. the relevance of possible future attacks on the crimean bridge, as far as from a military point of view there is expediency in this, it is definitely because it is the only logistical artery a to the same type of railway because there are railways although it is not yet it works fully, but it works in a reverse format and it is the only connection, a logistical connection of this type with mainland russia , so otherwise, but the crimean bridge must be destroyed and damaged so that it cannot be used, this will significantly reduce the ability of the russians to provide their president zelensky called the occupying group of troops logical rhetoric that putin would be forced to look for ways to

negotiate if ukrainian troops entered the administrative border with occupied crimea. will be there, i don't know, there is the greatest expediency and the exact time to hit the bridge once again, how do you assess it and how far are such negotiations possible, if indeed the ukrainian military is in charge of the border with crimea, i will say yes, we can actually hit the bridge and it would be expedient, but yes, but the city is still at a fairly large distance from the nearest location of the launch of some means of destruction, therefore, when exactly the launch of the entire means of destruction takes place. and until it reaches its goal, that is, the crimean bridge, a is it's time for that the a-a of the russian air defense system was activated so that they, er, made

two, three, or four attempts to shoot down this means of attack there, and only after that we can say that if all these lines of their air defense are breached, then it will be er, enough a successful strike was made, but there is quite dense anti-aircraft defense , unfortunately, that is why we need to reduce this distance , reduce the ability of the russian flag to respond to this threat, therefore, only after we reduce the distance, that is, we will go to the admin of the border with crimea can be used as optimally as possible and use means of destruction on the bridge, and the bbc writes that biden will also discuss the provision of cluster munitions to ukraine great britain by the way, one of the 123 countries that signed the convention on cluster munitions is the treaty that prohibits their production and use, new zealand, which also is a nato partner, in fact, they say that these munitions can cause enormous harm to innocent people, there are many opinions, many positions

, but what do you think, if the united states have already decided who the hell will get these ammunitions and how they can change the situation on the front from the usa, of course, we will get them because they never take a step back, and other countries are another issue because they are really attached to the bans on documents on banning cluster munitions and using them. but you, er, it’s one thing to produce it, to transfer it. another question is whether there are cluster munitions stored in great britain, both for touring artillery and for jet artillery, and not only a-a. so here the question is exclusively a-a how will it be legally agreed if great britain has such a set , how will it help us

, of course. it will help us because it solves the issue with one of the nomenclature of ammunition . we are getting more active shells in the required quantity to the classic for a decent artillery. let it be with a m -m-e-e cartridge cartridge warhead, then this increases our capabilities, our new possibilities regarding the danger, because the truth is dangerous, but mainly if you them you use it in populated areas in cities and where there is a civilian population, the defense forces of ukraine have already demonstrated repeatedly that we use the necessary means of destruction with high precision in places where the enemy's personnel and equipment are concentrated, and therefore the use of these munitions will be in the first place exactly where the enemy is located. but after determining in which areas and in which locations all ammunition was used

, the territory must be demined or some of these sub e-e su supplies will not e-e detonate and they remain lying in the ground like a slow-acting mine and there are risks already for the civilian population, therefore demining of this territory will be necessary in one way or another, but where we use these munitions, we will use them, demining the territory will be necessary anyway because almost all of it was mined anti-tank and anti-personnel weapons and explosives, er, the russian occupiers. therefore, the situation is such that on the one hand, there are risks on the other hand, well, we still have to solve this issue. and so we at least increase our coal potential, i still have a few questions for you don't have much time, actually, but still, president zelenskyi said that a mutiny could happen again in russia, there are people who support it. do you think it's about

politicians and summers or about the military who can support this institution, and in general, can this happen a second time in russia? there was a successful attack by him in agner. i think that the mutiny will really be a continuation of this story, this is not the end of the second act. and what kind of elites will there be? well, let's talk about it as it is. everyone is like that and so on. and all this is short. but there are often so many security guarantees that nato can provide during. right here for ukraine, what can they look like, will these security guarantees really protect ukraine? i see the main security guarantee as the maximum armament of our defense forces of ukraine and they already have this security better , to which nato can guarantee us , thank you, thank you for tuning in . oleksandr kovalenko, a military viewer of the information resistance group, a regular guest of our

broadcasts, was with us today. analyzed the situation at the front and how the events will unfold with the accession of ukraine to nato, this is the freedom of the morning, i remind the project about the important and the city became a fortress . military equipment was sent from the european union to protect the sky and land, and the local community of ukrainians said that they would raise 33 symbolic thousands of ukrainian flags in vilnius or ukraine became the 33rd member of nato, but it is still unknown whether he will visit from the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, as it is not known what exactly the leaders of the participating countries will decide on the results of the meeting, the details of the preparations for vinnytsia, that is what nato will tell zoryan stepanenko, the preparations for the nato summit, and the security and political allies at the finish line agree on the text of the final declaration, and vilnius, where are they will gather on the eve, it becomes a fortress protected by a thousand soldiers and the most modern weapons

, 12 petri launchers from germany , the nasams system from spain, self-propelled howitzers caesar from france will also have military aircraft means of combating drones and special operations forces, the security of the nato summit taking place in ukraine, which borders russia , belarus, the allies will ensure with joint efforts , the number of border guards will be tripled , the creation of an air shield over lithuania on the occasion of the summit is an additional evidence that a permanent system of defense systems is needed in ukraine the president of the host country of the summit says to the baltics that this is abnormal . it is irresponsible to leave the sky unprotected, but for me it is more important that our people are protected after the departure of the leaders, and in this sense, we still have a lot to work on. the order is aimed at strengthening the interoperability of the ukrainian army with the alliance of the creation

of the ukraine nato council, which will deepen cooperation and allow kyiv to initiate independent meetings, a security guarantee that the strongest allies can offer on a bilateral basis in vilnius, their format is currently being actively discussed however , the euro-atlantic will probably be the subject of the most heated discussions the future of ukraine is the most unsatisfactory of the promises made 15 years ago in bucharest to one day take it to nato in kyiv understand that membership is impossible in the narrative but want to be clear that it will happen later they calculate and shorten their way to the alliance by skipping the action plan regarding membership a set of military political legal requirements through which the eastern flank of the alliance passed, but which bypassed finland and sweden, the latter is still waiting for a decision on its accession, readiness to support ukraine's future membership in nato was testified by 23 countries declare in the office of president zelensky, and not only in the eastern and central regions, but also in many of the western ones, then germany

and the united states still remain cautious. president biden said in an interview the other day that a plan is needed that would pave ukraine's path to membership. we must develop a rational path for ukraine so that it could meet the conditions for joining nato . the alliance is a process that requires a certain amount of time to meet all the requirements, starting with democratization and ending with a number of other issues in the part of ukraine, the allies are still they are agreeing on the vinnytsia declaration. moreover, they are choosing words that would suit all its participants. vilnius will not be a repetition of exactly that. bucharest filled in the ambassador of the united states to nato, confirming that the possibility of abandoning the action plan regarding membership is being discussed in vilnius and a package of decisions that will be approved there will bring ukraine closer to nato . he announced the interim result dmytro kuleba , as for her invitation to the alliance, ukraine

was pleased with the open date. zoryan stepanenko marik hajduk radio liberty and the nato countries still agree on security guarantees for ukraine, and they are done in a hurry, the political publication writes about this with reference to sources familiar with the negotiations in the united states, great britain, germany and france agree on a declaration that would provide ukraine with security guarantees and give them and have been discussing this issue with kyiv for several weeks, as well as consulting with other allies of the european union and the big seven, while the countries of eastern europe insist that ukraine join the alliance to the accelerated regime, even despite the war, the next nato application was signed by president zelenskyy together with the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine and the prime minister at the end of september 22, but now most of the allies agree that ukraine will not be able to become a member of nato until the end of the war , so they are currently looking guarantees that could work for both sides , provide long-term assistance to ukraine in the defense and liberation of its own territory from russian occupation, and countries that will supply

weapons and equipment bilaterally with ukraine will determine exactly what and in what scope they can provide, besides, it is still unknown whether volodymyr zelenskyi himself will go on his own, because the ukrainian side does not know whether it is receiving a clear signal about joining nato and what the content of vilnivskyi 's final documents will be. this deputy prime minister of ukraine with a plan for euro-atlantic integration, olga stefanishyna , she says that the final documents will depend on whether zelensky will go to the ukrainian government, according to the deputy prime minister herself is negotiating with allies, and the day before volodymyr zelensky himself personally went on a tour, in particular, to turkey to establish a dialogue. in addition, stefanishyna noted that ukraine will be forced to review its own security strategy if it does not receive an invitation to the alliance in vilnius, but the head of ukrainian intelligence, kyrylo budanov, is sure that the hopes of ukrainians they don't make excuses about this summit and don't make excuses about it, he told an interview with the times publication, moreover , the chief intelligence officer of ukraine claims to have seen

drafts of speeches at the nato and ukraine summit this time they will not be invited to join nato in freedom oleksandr kraev, expert of the ukrainian foreign policy council prisma is already on our air, good morning to you, yes. greetings. good morning. thank you for joining . after the summit in lithuania, ukraine will not become a member of nato. today, the world leaders agree on what the experts agree on. and what then , according to the results of this meeting, ukraine can and could get, in fact , three scenarios should be considered: negative , realistic, positive, positive - this is what we get the whole package. that is, we get intermediate security guarantees or some understanding of how they will work, and we get a clear framework for our entry, that is, at what specific moment, under which conditions are fulfilled, we become nato members. it is clear that it will be after victory, but we need to move away from the pdc. it is necessary to get a new clearly formulated framework in order to

understand how we move forward, and in addition , the third point of an absolutely positive plan will be that part of nato will still be is ready to give ukraine more, it will be either garrisons on our territory or additional security guarantees, it will be because of some involvement in joint missions, that is, conditionally speaking, a ukrainian nato coalition is being formed, which while ukraine is not a member will be ready to give us more security. this is an absolutely positive scenario and an absolutely negative scenario is that the boys will simply say to us, girls, you are well done, hold on, we are morally with you, the audience remains, the door remains open, but this is all we can give, but this scenario is not very possible because, after all, i understood that it would be a defeat for him, and such a statement would be a gift to both the russians and the chinese, and after such a statement, the russians can say that this forest is full, you see how nato abandoned ukraine, and that is why we are coming to realistic scenario and the whole set of three, that is, the guarantee of the formation of a pro-ukrainian coalition and the provision

of a clear framework for ukraine, we get at least two points, which are difficult to say so far. because in reality, this summit is quite chaotic, and we see that at the last minute more amendments are being made. please tell me how you feel about the statements of the ukrainian president and, in particular, the ukrainian authorities that zelenskyi will personally go to lithuania for a visa visit only if ukraine receives good signals. how politically diplomatic is this a good game and in the hands of ukraine or the other way around, actually, they don't behave with partners, that's how i phrase it, actually, well, it's a tool of diplomacy. that is , we can't get away from the fact that which one is used , it's possible, it's called fopa, it's so-so a diplomatic move, when we simply show our partners that we do not accept the terms of the negotiations that are currently being formed

. we would like to revise the a-a agenda. otherwise, we will repeat it for the fifth or sixth time, you understand, a joke repeated twice is no longer funny. and what can we say about a diplomatic provocation repeated five times six times, this is already a bit of a problem, that is, if the first few times it was clear that ukraine reacts in this way to the fact that the topic of ukraine is somehow changing, it is not going in the direction in which we would like to see it, and this is logical, we reacted to this, everything is already starting to look like we are simply unreliable and may not behave maturely to what is being discussed, that is, so far none of our allies has expressed such fears of such views . but we just need to stop repeating the same joke five times . big, and this was also discussed in the statements of president zelenskyi

, where he said in one of them that this summit is about to become historic. in some diplomatic language. if it is possible, i do not think that they will become more involved because, first of all, nato already does a lot for ukraine, and secondly, it is too much for us, and there is no alternative option for our security, well, relatively speaking the key issue of our security at this stage is still the nuclear umbrella and russia's impossibility to repeat this aggression after our victory . we need to understand that we still have to know, we still have to work, we still have to be a part of this alliance, that is why we have no right to quarrel, simply from a historical perspective, that this can really change. so, it is rather that we are refocusing on working with

by specific countries on a bilateral option or on a coalition option, because it was precisely in the coalition format that nato was always the most successful, let's recall that all nato operations were essentially conducted in the coalition format , the ones that were successful were the operations in the middle east in afghanistan, in yugoslavia, in rivan, it was always not all members of the alliance, but only those who were ready to bear more responsibility . maybe in ukraine. at this stage, it is precisely necessary to follow the same path, not to try to appease all members of the alliance, but to start actively to work only with those who are really ready to take on more obligations and provide more security, as of now, who are the biggest opponents, and who or who is most cautious about ukraine , even in wartime, and there is an accelerated procedure or under some hmm, it actually became a member of nato in a special way, this is the united states, germany and france, so france can already be removed from this list, because i myself did not think that i would say that a month ago, but macron is now one of the key proponents

of ukraine to the accession, and even to the express accession, and even some say with relaxed requirements, that is, in fact, macron began to play his own game and he changed his position , so he is no longer an opponent, but the americans. so , unfortunately for them, it is rather part of the bargain with china, they understand that china is now expanding nato well, it will be like a red rag and they can really go to the union with the russians because of this and that is why this situation is very threatening for them, ah, the germans. yes, we heard that they are still hesitating. they are still not there of an adequate position, and of course our old acquaintances, the hungarians, turks and slovaks, who have not yet expressed their objections, but believe me, as soon as the talks about ukraine's accession to nato begin, the same thing that happened with finland, sweden will begin, political bargaining and attempts to milk us for any political concessions to play two more short questions and for equally short answers , i still count on how much time is needed for that, objectively, manerevis, well, realistically , and for ukraine to become a full member nato needs very little time for a political solution, we need to win

and politically we become members of nato so that we are all considered the new nato and the political negotiations are over, it takes at least a year or two and the question is final here, there is still a little bit of time, but not so much, they said before that ukraine does not have a secure future without nato, or does nato have a powerful future without ukraine , so let's not really, the ukrainian army believes that in terms of quality and experience, the majority of the alliance's army ukraine has undoubtedly the best experience in fighting the main enemies of nato and in the court at the current stage of nato will not be able to defeat china and, accordingly, defeat russia without ukraine. well, now it is simply criminally important for them to have in their warehouse. about the political aspects of ukraine's accession to nato about what to expect from the summit well, as the experts said, not only ukraine needs nato, but nato also needs

ukraine in the comments by the way, you can write do you believe that ukraine will become a member of nato. for today, this was all a project of radio freedom, freedom of the morning. traditionally, at this threshold , we talk about important things and offer you a selection of the most important. subscribe to our youtube and on other platforms. we will meet you on the air tomorrow . it lasts 502 days. of a full-scale war russia against ukraine batteries news on espresso in angelika's studio a season another terrorist act by the russians the occupiers hit the walnut tree with a guided aerial bomb during the delivery of humanitarian aid four people were killed