[000:00:00;00] this is how we used to say in the spring of the formation of the battlefield. yes, that's right, the redagan is now forming its political battlefield of the political battle - this is the positioning of the political battle, changing it a little and from the weak ethan who was before the first before the first round of elections, so he needed with putin's help, we now see a weak putin who needs the support of the horde and the etagan has more opportunities to maneuver and to take such unexpected steps. and by the way, erdogan's statement that ukraine deserved to be a member of nato a long time ago and if these are not empty words, but rather the willingness to actually vote for such a decision, it is so different from what is currently happening in the united states, for example, when joseph

biden says that ukraine is not ready, that nato countries are not ready to see ukraine in the alliance . actually from maryland from the university of maryland from skupy from ee with military security expert justin lauren joshua from cypherinson word they write about the fact that this is generally the best time in vilnius should say no to ukraine and even close the door to ukraine's accession to nato, because they say ukraine will only bring problems and will be a difficult partner to protect my brothers. i will read this publication, now i have seen quite a lot of reactions from the ukrainian

expert environment, which examines in sufficient detail what kind of persons these are and how this shameful material got on the asphalt, there will be a reaction from of american european structures, it is clear that certain groups are groping for such a soil, they seem to think that this is academic freedom and diversity of opinion, in fact, this is just stupid russian propaganda, because the material is very low-quality, precisely low-quality. it does not deserve to be published, not because there is another point vision because there are absurd and illogical conclusions , but less if we talk about etagan, he also did not say that there turkey will vote for admission, he said he formulated it so

optically that ukraine deserved well, of course there is he is so sympathetic, but at the same time, he knows very well that in vinnytsia we do not receive an invitation to immediately join nato, that the nato papacy of ukraine is a process that will begin, which is already being talked about, but the actual accession will begin immediately after the end of the war. no one promises a day, we don't demand it ourselves, but you can't demand something that you definitely won't get . well, rdagan just once again indicates his position, understanding that for now it is uh, that this battle is about tomorrow and not about today. well, what asked about this conversation that president zelenskyy raised during this visit and meeting with the turkish

leader about the fact that no one should have a monopoly on the establishment of routes and corridors, so to speak, in the black sea and about the fact that turkey could be a country which will guarantee an alternative, conditionally speaking , corridor in the event that the grain agreement completely collapses on the russian side on their initiative, and does turkey have two questions here and practical means to ensure such a security corridor is to guarantee this. it has enough power and means, and on the other hand, how politically achievable is this goal in principle? well, we have one example in november of last year, the grain corridor worked without russia, and then we remember how much the volume of grain increased, how much this destructive role of the russians and the russian part of this joint joint commission that

monitors ships because it was rejected and everything worked as it should and now the corridor is actually stopped and here turkey has the means, obviously does it have some or do they they will give a one hundred percent guarantee, no, no one can, except for conducting well enough powerful external forces, i don’t know british american disasters and it is better a military expert, but what i see is what i understand , no one can give a one hundred percent guarantee of safety for the vessels, now they will provoke the russians there for some reason shooting or will they throw a change and blame ukraine for this, the country, as you know, always fires at itself so that this does not happen, we or we fired at ourselves, they demolished mariupol for me or this is uh, your ppu means fall into their

houses well, that's all of them, that's how they will act, or will turkey go for it? well, that's the balance between uh, the ability and the assessment of the probability of such provocations on the part of russia, on the one hand, uh, on the other hand, to invent the benefits are very large and economic and political. by the way, the major beneficiary of this grain agreement is grain with a discount, political weight , and global and regional attention is attached to it in this connection. and

they are killing our people, i condemned the transfer of cluster munitions in ukraine , they say that this is an example of destabilizing actions of america, isn't it cynical and early to make such statements in general? the united states completely denies that it is guilty of any involvement in shameful terrorist illegal actions, they are consistent in this, they always respond to all accusations that they supply some kind of weapons that first of all you do not proved that the party is not there, but others are really selling or supplying some kind of weapon that is prohibited by international conventions

, which is inhumane, and they, by the way , follow the left-wing discourse on the statements and reports of international human rights organizations and often highlight them here as well human rise watch, if i'm not mistaken. yes, she spoke out against the program and even that was going to organize a company . the morning before that is not an exception , quite in line with the statement of human race watch. the israel of israelis in the presidential territories is not at all a new practice for them. and finally, it became known about israel that since 2010, in russia, under the license of israel , they have been producing drones, which again, er,

kill our military and our civilians . what should be the reaction of ukraine should we insist or eventually israel will be able to withdraw this license ? of the expert level, er, they asked the same question, they are very er, so er, we don’t supply anything to me under the license, it’s been sold for a long time, it’s an outdated choice, it won’t do you much harm there. well, as we can see, it ’s the exact opposite, er, this plant is already very successful does the lancet work, they cause a lot of damage, but they can, no, they can't, and most importantly

, they don't want to. thank you very much, mr. sergey serhii danilov, deputy director of the center for middle eastern studies, helped us deal with the delicate issues of eastern politics in the spring. meanwhile, now we will already moving to kyiv, where our colleague, comrades, brother, you can say igorchich renda is already connected to our theory of the mountain, we are glad to see you. how is kyiv ? thank you, it is hot in kyiv today. it is sunny, but really, the breeze is blowing like that. and i would not say that it is very beach weather, so just before work on monday, we will talk about the nato summit in vilnius, which actually begins today and will last until wednesday, at which we are waiting for some fateful decisions for our country, for our society and for our army, and now about

this is let's talk with andrii maghera, a legal expert. we welcome you, mr. andrii. well, let's start with the fact that this month today published the latest statistical sociological information about the fact that 89% of ukrainians see that they want to see ukraine as part of nato and in all regions , unambiguously support in the east, 79 in the west 93 and another very important indicator of comparison with last year. as of may last year, that is, in may 22, 39% of respondents insisted only on joining nato, and 42% to receive security guarantees instead. well and by may of this year, public opinion has significantly changed to 53 percent, the share of those who insist on joining nato members has increased, and only 29% believe that security guarantees will suit us .

i congratulate the viewers of the espresso tv channel , which i respect, in fact, you asked the question. indeed, we have a very significant shift in the direction of the crazy support of ukrainians for joining the north atlantic alliance . there are many reasons for this and it is enlightening. the work is even bigger. i would say that this is the integration of ukraine into society - our society into the european continent, in general, the visa-free regime also had an effect on this, and definitely. it was affected by the russian aggression towards ukraine. rockets made ukrainians fall in love with ukraine. to love ukraine and understand what nato is, that it is the only option that can fully guarantee the security of ukraine . it is a pity that these people, who now all support joining nato, did not support it for 20 years or so. 25 years ago, i think that presidents kuchma, yushchenko, or

poroshenko could only dream of this 89%. well, the question is that really no one there has done as much for the unity of the ukrainian nation as vladimir putin and the armed forces of russia. unfortunately, as a result of the deaths of tens of possible hundreds of thousands of ukrainians, this is a pity, but i still return to security guarantees, why last may year it was already because 2.5 months of aggression or even three and people believed that there would be security guarantees for us acceptable, now their number has decreased by one and a half times, that is, people do not really perceive security guarantees, they perceive a clearly signed document, article five of the nato charter, an attack on a country is considered an attack on the entire alliance, why has the position regarding security guarantees changed so much, let's not forget the time when the polls were conducted, it was may 2022

what happened as of may 2022, we were told in the only so-called telethon from all the irons that nato is possible and not a guarantee of security or maybe we don't need nato maybe nato doesn't want us and so on, and maybe we don't have to go there, so i think to some extent the tv channels of the single marathon also had an effect on this, but time is running out, ukrainians have seen that during this year, the russian federation continues to actively launch missile strikes on the territory of ukraine to hit peaceful civilian objects and i think that this additionally affected the position of ukrainians. i think that this percentage is not final. 89% will continue to grow. i think according to my forecast it will be somewhere around 95.96 . well, let's talk about history. you mentioned one historical very interesting one. fact 9 and the fourth year immediately after the death of stalin and 5 years after the creation of nato as

a north atlantic military bloc, the ukrainian state then the ukrainian soviet socialist republic submitted its application to join nato along with these applications i understand that the ussr would do what was the name of the russian ussr? comment on this. why do we now talk very little about that application? how realistic was it then? why was it not really approved in soviet times? this fact was actively hushed up. i want to remind you who was involved prerequisites nato was formed in washington in 1949 after the signing of the e-e nato charter in 1954 exclusively for propaganda purposes i want to emphasize this exclusively for propaganda purposes the soviet union officially submitted an application to join nato together with this application was also submitted by the ukrainian ssr and the belarusian rs, therefore only these two union republics, because they were not just members of the un, but also co-founders

of the united nations, this application was considered for two months in the spring of 1954, and then france, germany, germany great britain, other states expressed their views, they did not say anything. the soviet union does not share the values ​​of nato, therefore it cannot be here and accepted. and only a year later, in 1955 , the organization of the warsaw pact was formed, which initially included eight states and which definitely oriented everyone in the soviet union, such a fact really took place in 1954 and it should not be forgotten in any case , even though it had such a troll character, but it really had a bridge, that is, ukraine actually claims to be a member of nato since 1954, even with such a humorous method, but it has already been 70 years, if you count it like this, it is really necessary to take into account that since ukraine is the sole legal successor of the ukrainian soviet

socialist republic, we can say with full responsibility that this was the first application of ukraine for entry, the organization of the north atlantic treaty , this took place and we should not forget about it, and there are other interesting facts. union, the russian federation took against the rights of contrary to the charter of the united nations organization. well, you mentioned the warsaw pact very quickly. i would say such a verb , the russians nailed it and the russians in one year , literally, after the refusal to join the gnato, and you said nine countries in the eight, a significant number of which were already directly stationed by soviet troops in well, at that time, in particular , the german democratic republic. on issues of european and euro-atlantic integration, she gave one comment to our colleagues from european pravda and she said that, in principle, ukraine's support is

strong enough within the alliance, in particular , the countries of the east-southeast-eastern bloc of nato are very actively supporting us, well, the czech republic , poland, bulgaria the ukrainian president was in slovakia. turkey unexpectedly announced that it supports dogan ukraine's accession to nato. stefanyshyn also mentioned norway and denmark in this article. comments well, you know, she said about the usa, a very interesting position, i will quote the quote, it is no secret that the role of the usa has always been key, it is key now in the negotiations with turkey regarding sweden's membership in nato, bucharest, when in bucharest, when the united states insisted that ukraine receive a plan actions regarding membership in nato, and europe was against it, but now the situation is diametrically different, says stefanyshina, now it is not the united states, but europe that demands that ukraine join nato, there is indeed a certain change

in the positions of the united states then in bucharest in 2008 europe, france, and germany in particular supported ukraine. and now the situation has changed diametrically, and indeed the republican administration of president george w. jr. actively supported the granting of a joint venture to ukraine regarding the organization of the north atlantic treaty . to date, the united states has somewhat slowly slowed down its support under the government of the democratic president john bae . - joyden, although you definitely have to give him credit, he does a lot for ukraine , but frankly speaking, i am very disappointed the position of canada, which could do much more and in my opinion, we should already lose the illusion that this is a pro-ukrainian country in the big seven, we need to look realistically at those things, just look with real eyes. at the same time, we must not forget that the number of

of countries that support ukraine's accession to nato has already increased significantly, according to the latest data, the last country that announced this was portugal - it is the 23rd country out of 31. that is , only 8 countries are still hesitant somewhere among them, definitely. this is the united states - this is canada hungary, no matter how we feel about it, hungary too, unfortunately. even one state that will say no, unfortunately, it will be, well, stop this prosthesis process. please, vice prime minister stefanyshyn mentioned the president of hungary , who signed the document of the budapest nine yes, if i am not mistaken, which countries supported ukraine and its accession to nato, and stefanyshina said that in hungary, well, not everything is so clear-cut , that is, the president is for us. there really is so little space, but we must not forget that the president of hungary, who supported ukraine's accession to nato, is enough such a formal figure according to the distribution of power in this state. hungary is a parliamentary republic according to the constitution, and in fact , the president has little to decide with such

totality of power, including in the field of foreign relations, it is in the hands of prime minister viktor orban . about this last week , on the eve of the vilnius summit, the ukrainian president made such a trip to the countries of the eastern-southern bloc, the eastern-southern wing of the nato bloc, he was in the czech republic, slovakia, bulgaria, and turkey. well, in principle quite successfully, well, in particular, the president of turkey and its leader unexpectedly said that turkey supports our nato euro on the atlantic invasion after that, too . after this meeting from turkey , the regimental commanders of the unit of the national guard of ukraine, who were actually in extradition there after being transferred from azov, were returned to ukraine became so and these people have already returned to ukraine , we hope that we will soon talk with them live

. simenyan, one of the main propagandists from the russian kremlin, who said, "well, are we going to swallow it, let's get out of the grain agreement and let's strike there." medvedev proposes to strike at ukrainian nuclear power plants, as well as at european nuclear power plants. can turkey itself, with its armed forces and navy, ensure the implementation of the grain agreement, please, really on the grain agreement, for now there is some uncertainty. at the same time, i would like you emphasize the fact that the russian federation perfectly understands and if it does not agree to this grain agreement, then turkey is able to ensure the transportation of grain to the ports of the turkish republic with e-e under the convoy of its armed forces. i think that this is quite realistic, it is not even necessary to introduce some cruisers, e.e., additional warships of other

nato countries in the black sea. i think the russian federation understands this perfectly. i will say for my part. so, i, along with all ukrainians, are those who, with the return of the ukrainian commanders of azov in ukraine, are a wonderful wonderful event and this should be welcomed as much as possible. at the same time, i would like us not to have inflated expectations regarding turkey, as the previous periods show , the actual history of relations between ukraine and turkey is always after some pro-ukrainian step on the part of erdogan and with a pro-russian step. what is this step? he will be. i don't know, but my intuition tells me that there are some very serious agreements going on, including those that we don't know about yet. well, i will also add that about 2,000 azov residents are still in captivity in russian in different regions in different conditions, and often these conditions are simply inhumane, and of course we have to think about their fates and do everything so that these ukrainian prisoners of war who were captured and surrendered under the guarantees of the international red

cross returned to ukraine and were exchanged. did not lose their health in the torture chambers of russian prisons. thank you. andriy magera was with us for the last 15 minutes . express from the right. well, we connected with mykhailivska square in kyiv. monday to work, friends, i pass the word to you, thank you, thank you, the sea, monday is a hard day. we will continue to work . ihor chicheryna was with us. uah 589,873 and how many pennies are there from our collection, and we need a total of one million uah 300,000, don't stop even though we will finish our tr , our colleagues will continue our tr, and there will also be announcements about this collection, join let's close it as soon as possible and let's announce it to the vets. it's so nice

to announce and say that the collection is closed . we have 589,873 uah in our account. well, we are at this station. we say goodbye, see you next morning at seven in the morning, as usual, but for now, we will pass the word to our colleagues after a short break , project partner, healthy vision, glaufix glaufix, protection and maintenance of your vision, feeling of visual impairment, discomfort in in the eyes, sensitivity to bright light, these are possible

precursors of cataracts and glaucoma, and the solution is glaufix to protect and maintain visual acuity, zelofix is ​​11 effective components to protect your eyes, glaufix sharp vision forever, according to the who, about 285 million people around the world suffer from visual impairment with 39 million of them are affected by blindness every year, the number of blind people increases by 1-2 million, it turns out that every 5 seconds one person on earth loses his sight in ukraine accurate official statistics on the number of people with disabilities no sight according to various estimates - this is more than 300,000 ukrainians. visual impairment is most often observed at school age in the form

of nearsightedness or farsightedness or already after 40 years of age. it is glaucoma and cataract . diabetic retinopathy is also common - it is damage to the retina of the eye caused by diabetes, the biggest problem in all of these in cases of untimely referral to a doctor on the risk of developing diseases of the visual system are influenced by heredity, genetic predisposition to ophthalmic diseases such as glaucoma or cataracts is a factor that cannot be ruled out genes inherited by us from our parents and grandparents can be silent for several decades and suddenly appear already in adulthood bad habits few people know that nicotine and cyanides that are part of tobacco products worsen the blood supply to the eyes, which leads to before the development of conjunctivitis due to the occlusion of blood vessels and

even cataracts, if you take korets or abuse alcohol, then vision problems are guaranteed to you poor nutrition without the necessary vitamins and minerals in the diet vision can deteriorate and provoke various pathologies, for example, it is common knowledge that cataracts develop more often in people with a lack of zinc in the body , in the days when housewives used galvanized dishes , there were much fewer cases of this disease, in order to prevent vision loss and reduce the risk of developing diseases of the visual apparatus, it is necessary to follow the following recommendations to get rid of harmful habits and discipline yourself , it is necessary to carry out regular diagnostics

, thanks to which you can identify problems on the initial stage, but the most important thing that ophthalmologists insist on is that the eyes must be constantly nourished with a complex of useful substances that can reduce the risk of developing serious diseases of the visual apparatus and maintain visual acuity, vision loss occurs imperceptibly gradually and very often painlessly, that is why it is worth taking care of your health in advance and the acuity of your vision. be healthy. feelings of visual impairment, eye discomfort, sensitivity to bright light, these are possible precursors of cataracts and glaucoma. the solution is glaufix for

protection and maintenance of visual acuity glaufix is ​​11 effective components to protect your eyes glaufix sharp vision lasts forever 502 days full-scale news russia vs. ukraine veteri news on espresso in the angelika studio of the season and again suffers from the russians kherson region invaders hit residential apartment