[000:00:00;00] an important letter that i signed and which was provided by nato in 2008 with a request to provide us with a peace treaty, i welcome the decision of nato member countries to remove the need for ukraine to go through a peace treaty and give us the opportunity to join the alliance in one step in the future, this is the first second to date key important key importance is giving ukraine everything it needs to win this war again i would like to see ukraine become a member as soon as possible natalie as danylo said we are dealing with a lack

political will and i can see different calculations here in different capitals starting from washington to berlin even to turkey and so on that can explain this hesitation , this is a matter of unity and in order to get a real practical result in washington next year ukraine must win the war. and it is for this reason that i am now focusing first of all on the issues

of security guarantees for ukraine. will join nato, but now we are talking about long-term financial and military assistance to ukraine in order to win this bloody war and this will be the best answer. this is the best answer to putin and a dictator like putin. so my position is ukraine is to be compan make me ukraine has to become a member of nato in the near future, ukraine must do its work in terms of reforming. the alliance must show strong political will and unity to give ukraine nato membership - it will be in the interests to the alliance of ukraine and the entire free world, the alliance and our best partners and friends must do everything possible to ensure that ukraine wins this war, and for this we need financial, economic and military support in this amount, and

until then it will be damn much necessary. thank you, mr. pasov volker, the next question for you, mrs. yatsenyuk, said about the serious achievements of this precisely to nato, if we speak responsibly we must not forget that many important decisions were made within the framework of this meeting today and yesterday, however, in your opinion, since you study well and know the russian mentality, in your opinion, how will russia interpret the results of willivskyi, exactly how are they interpretable, or will they think that nato is too hesitant to accept ukraine , please thank you, daniel, he answers briefly by

answering yes, yes, that's exactly how they will do it. they will read such decisions as the removal of the pdc, the replacement of the commission of ukraine with nato by the council , assistance to the country in achieving the whole of the joint work before that, all this is very good and positive they show good will to the alliance, but from putin's point of view, what putin sees is, first of all, hesitation, a lack of determination on the part of nato member countries regarding ukraine's membership in the alliance . that is, we have not taken a step that is necessary to restore the former world order , which when i think about how russia considers such decisions, it reminds me of the withdrawal

of troops from afghanistan, when the special forces of ukraine rescued journalists e wall street girl near the airport at a time when the american military was told not to do this this indeed, such a very impressive insecurity and hesitation that we see something similar, we are not able to clearly formulate commitment to the euro-atlantic in the future of ukraine and one more thing i should have said earlier but i will say it now also in agreement with what has already been said by others not the end of the story, no, we cannot consider this as some kind of failure that will change the future. i believe that ukraine's future is in the alliance, as it was said in

the fireplace. i think that there is no alternative to ukraine's membership in a united , prosperous europe, and in particular in the european union and we support it. we all have to put our efforts into this because it is in our common interests of the united states of europe nato of ukraine in our common interests to ensure that this is what happens. so i think it will be but so far we just lost another yesterday one opportunity to get closer to this thank you for your support and for your powerful solidarity with ukraine, which we greatly appreciate, now moving on to john, i have two questions, if possible, the first question, you have already talked about it, but i would like

to ask you to detail how you evaluate the tactics of president zelensky during this right there, uh, i just saw a quote from the financial times that bemoaned the content of the defense of great britain today said that we are not amazon, where we will easily provide everything i want ukraine well, i would say this quite disturbing such a message that is disturbing what i saw in this text that the minister of defense of great britain uses such and such a text so what kind of tactics how did president zelensky behave, how persuasive was he and what do people think about how he

behaved in vilnius and the second question is how do you think the results of the nato summit will affect the domestic kitchen in washington because the domestic political kitchen because a lot of people said that president biden wants to stay on the track he described vilnius caused their own internal problems . so, two such questions to you , repeat the first question. how do you assess the tactics of the ukrainian delegation of president zelensky himself ? president zelensky was and remains cool . there is no question that politics even before the great invasion of russia into ukraine, the biden administration said that russia would win in ukraine, and we provided massive financial, military, and economic aid , and all efforts were made by the event to attract

as many hands as possible to help ukraine, and understanding the gravity of the situation, what we achieved it is impressive, but i want to say that the policy of president biden is not very adequate because he did not do much. he did not clearly state against which state he will take what position the united states will take in this war. he did not say about the goal that it was a victory for ukraine or a defeat for russia, and he did not explain to the american people that it is very useful to help ukraine and that it is not just a philanthropic move to help ukraine and, accordingly, departing from this , the presidential administration should provide very powerful or advanced

weapons in ukraine until ukraine showed itself on the battlefield and they did not develop a much more powerful program that would include ukraine's cooperation with nato and stages for ukraine to join nato, this was not done therefore, such an approach risks the fact that later on it can lead to defeat if the defense gets tired of supporting ukraine , this is where the problem of more moisture is and it is very well understood in kyiv, therefore, on the one hand, they must put pressure and continue to put pressure on the united states to provide more advanced weapons and zelensky a has a rather influential voice in washington and in europe, but he must not be anti-, not expose his supporters to the opposition, he does not want

to upset biden in the same way, but the way he did it was, in principle, necessary to do what he did, but we have to, er, press, continue to put pressure on the guys so that he continues to help ukraine, and we see that zelenskyi understands this dilemma, which one has , which one does he have? understanding of what the us should do and what it does for ukraine, that's all that remains and there are a lot of stories about domestic politics in the us, there are many reasons that are important for the biden administration. why

did he take such a soft approach to nato it because his political advisers are not military, they want him to be re-elected and they say that this conflict is best resolved in this way without pressure , i don't know how true this is. a recent survey even by the reagan institute showed that the majority of the vast majority of americans is 70%. support more powerful us aid to ukraine and also support the us on the path of ukraine's accession to nato, so i think that it is a historic opportunity for nato for president biden to show his mastery of foreign policy and provide absolutely everything possible for ukraine in order to win on the battlefield and fully involve ukraine in europe, in the eu and in

nato, because in nato the voice of the usa is much more powerful than eu but now this opportunity is lost and i think this is a powerful mistake and i think that it did not give a more powerful position to biden to prepare for the elections next year thank you mr. jun now i'm going to mr. i'm sorry i didn't want to talk about theories mutiny that always exist around any serious event, but i want to name only one thing and do it on purpose so that this never happens again. some people believe that there is no formal invitation of ukraine to nato because the question of

ukraine's membership in nato can be certain point of trade with russia in the future. this is probably something that will never be accepted in ukraine itself , because the vast majority of ukraine would like to join nato as a country. so, what do you think about such a context? and what do you think about the most important priorities that ukraine together with our allies and friends inside and outside the alliance must do this year before before we prepare for the next one in washington

and it floats us, it worries us, there are various rumors, we as politicians as people hear these rumors and we can only guess what will happen next, but obviously one trend that is very worrying is that ukraine can be forced to go to some kind of negotiations later in the fall, i don't know what russia's role will be in this process, but nevertheless i see the danger that comes from the broader strategy of the western side, not only in relation to ukraine, but in relation to the wider region, including belarus and russia, and of course i am

i argue that ukraine is rebuilding the victory of ukraine issue, and i think that this will have a positive effect on the entire region, and in particular on russia as well, and even without this, in fact, we can make quite serious mistakes and by forcing, let's say ukraine to go to some negotiations with putin's putin's russia, because there is concern that putin is now weakened , they can come to power. people like prigozhin will have a complete collapse there, there will be chaos and he will come to power. someone like prigozhin will get nuclear weapons under his control. let's make sure that there are negotiations. i think this is a big

mistake. it only gives putin the opportunity to rest and prepare for a new aggression. so what we need is to have a clear strategy for ensuring stable peace on to the european continent and this requires big changes in russia, and big changes in russia can only happen after the victory of ukraine. this is what i see as necessary for the west to understand, and ukraine is showing excellent results if you look even at the relations between nato and ukraine and if to remember why nato was created in the 49th year of the last century, it was done in order to stop the soviet empire and stalin in their expansion, e.e. in striving for expansion. and

now ukraine is defending not only itself, but all of europe against putin's attempts to expand and restore his empire on the european continent, that's why people in ukraine should not emphasize that ukraine should be grateful to us for what we do, and we should be grateful to ukraine for what it does even without nato membership and do not even have an invitation to nato membership, this is what i see as a lack of a certain strategic understanding , guided by what ukraine is doing today, and what is happening on the european continent, and regarding the successes

of ukraine at the front, and now they are turning to arseniy yatsenyuk, with a request to summarize our discussion and my final question, even during our discussion, you emphasized that certain critics can say that there was an almost imperceptible difference between the investment and the balance, there is an almost imperceptible difference between the final statements to you in bucharest and vilnius, but some may say that there is little difference between what was decided in bucharest and the decision of the big seven regarding the security guarantee for ukraine, you have already said this briefly, but i would like to ask you to expand on this answer. do you understand this formula or can it really to be the way to european and ukrainian security and what should be your final message to our partners based on the results

of the vinnytsia summit, she is there. well, i don’t. i don’t support these statements. i don’t accept them. the only thing is a security guarantee that can to protect ukraine is the fifth article of the washington-washington e-e agreement, i heard a lot of miracles about the experience of israel or south korea or others , but there is a huge difference, let's say that if compared to israel, they do not admit that they have nuclear weapons, but there are rumors that they have nuclear weapons and ukraine does not have nuclear weapons

the state by its side. so, the only effective security grants for ukraine can only be guaranteed by the fifth article of the washington treaty regarding the prospects. you asked about how president zelenskyi is going along this course, how he is going to the end of the road, in my opinion, he is working in the international arena quite successfully and you have to give him credit for that, but i also think that he does not need to give credit to him, and in the implementation of reforms inside the country, this is what ukraine really needs. as for president biden, i said so. i think that we are getting more much more in washington at the next annual, those nato ambassadors, the coat of arms absolutely rightly rightly remarked the president uh-uh biden

should take advantage of this historic opportunity i the united states is the leader of the free world they will lead the free world and all this help to ukraine is not purely charity to ukraine, russia has undergone serious demilitarization and they will need at least 10 years to build their visa military power thanks to the efforts and struggle of ukraine i want to contact the bank near sado p volker and panakherson and you danylo, all the teams that support our opposition, that in the coming years, we have an important task to get

practical, substantial results at the next nato meeting in washington. until this happens, it is absolutely necessary to provide ukraine with everything necessary as a ukrainian state then the korean army in order to fight against russian aggression and liberate our territories captured by russia to ensure lasting long-term peace in europe thank you very much i want to thank all of you gentlemen for the important work done on the date of the discussion for your thoughts are of great importance to the ukrainian audience as we try to understand and soberly realize the results of what nato just passed in

vinnytsia, we will continue our partnership with nato, we are moving forward we should not be disappointed when our people our heroes continue my struggle at the front, i want to thank them and wish them every success on the battlefield and share with you my certainty that ukraine will win and become a member of nato and we will be able to achieve that at the washington summit, we receive from the invitation for membership variations thank you all very much for participating in these discussions and we look forward to your participation in our further evenings good evening we are from ukraine well, just for the first time, the big ether with you my

name is vasyl zima, we are joining to eten on the espresso tv channel, we will work with you. during the next hours and six minutes , a lot of interesting things are ahead, so today you won't hear serhiy zgurets, he will tell the most important things tomorrow, but you will definitely still hear oleksandr marchenko money during the war you will hear yuriy fizr who will talk about the world, what he is doing for ukraine and what is happening there in general, also the weather forecast is planned and a review of sports events is planned, but today at 19:45 we will have such an interesting broadcast from lithuania in vilnius, the president of the united states of america, joseph biden, will speak in front of the students of the vilnin university and we will offer this broadcast to you, of course, with a translation and

listen to what the eternal will say here. because you know, one thing that biden says to politicians of his level, one thing that he says in front of the delegates, the participants of the nato summit, this is still a conversation, an adult conversation, and with adult people who ah live now and now and now and now they influence this the world is completely different to hear what biden will say to the new generation of the generation that will solve many problems in the future, and most importantly, i think biden understands this and should understand what other politicians of this time do, that they have a unique opportunity to leave a minimum of problems for the future generation, you know in the future, we solved the question of what other species of animals should be preserved so that they do not disappear. and how to treat cancer, how to treat ra a little faster, and we will forget about the fact that there is aids, mmm , we will think about how to stop global warming so that it does not warm so much and somehow or to use global warming

to increase productivity, for example, how to communicate between people, which language is better, which language is even better, how to synchronize the cultures of the world. it is possible to remove some bacon-dangerous moments, then it is possible that those students who will listen to biden today will solve completely different issues, completely different problems and will invest money to ensure that everyone has food and health so that terrible diseases can be cured because so far with billions of dollars is being spent on stopping the aggressor and on multiplying multiplying multiplying multiplying weapons now. literally in a few minutes there will be news. i will tell you a lot because unfortunately a lot of tragic things happened in ukraine today the enemy fired at zaporizhzhia, the enemy fired at kherson, and here i am again reading about the arrival of a flight over kherson, i won't tell

you what kind of unknown object fell there, how many people were injured , what was the destruction , we will discuss a few other important topics. therefore, at 7:45 p.m., we are waiting for biden's speech in vinnytsia university well and also my colleagues join the broadcast and literally in a few minutes the news wait be with us this is a long term we work for you balm 10% pharmacies travel bag bam and save pain can become an obstacle walking up the stairs not with my knees from pain in the knees try the knee cream dolgit relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves the mobility of the joints, you can also walk the only yellow cream for pain in the joints, stiffness in the joints and spine , osteochondrosis, gout, sciatica, arthritis and arthrosis, with all these problems, you will find the remedy for external use

of dikrasin consultations by phone 0800-215 349 calls are free i'm back i was sad just not combispasm go combispasm power that tames your pain watch this week in the program judicial control with tatyana shustrova raider takeover of bilotserkivskaya tpp on whose side themis is connected with the country, if you cooperate with pavel fops on thursday , july 13 at 5:45 p.m., the judicial control program with tetyana shustrova on espre tv channel, mykola

veresen, vitaly portnikov and the main topics of the week, if ukraine will be used no god willing, really tactical nuclear weapons , it will definitely change the world. stories, problems, analysis and personalities, we are waiting for john gerbs, the former ambassador to the united states in ukraine. it's worth looking into portnikov september that friday at 21:15 for espresso we will continue the big ether now is the time for the most important events that happened at this hour and we will start an 81-year-old man unfortunately died due to enemy shelling in kherson his wife got a desire for the occupiers hit in the residential quarters of the city from artillery , another woman was also injured in an undiagnosed concussion of the head and a