[000:00:00;00] answer ukraine has become a global force and should become a force of global development, i am sure it will be. glory to everyone who fights for ukraine. i thank everyone who

protects our state. glory to ukraine . lord, the borders of ukraine are for drones . join the gathering of border guards. our weapon is the truth. marathon is the only news with you. the public information front team is working everything will be ukraine three events in ukraine at six in the morning the air of the single telethon is picked up by the public information team in the studio maya podgorodetska works for you in sign language translated by iryna skolova and we start with the news, as soon as ukraine has the resources, it will liberate the crimea occupied by russia , this is what the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine valery zaluzhny said in an interview with the wall street journal

. who is afraid of putin's reaction, zaluzhny also said that ukraine needs more ammunition from its partners . after all, the number of casualties among the defenders of ukraine also depends on this, according to zaluzhny , the defense forces of ukraine are striking at the territory of the russian federation with weapons of its own production to save its people why should i ask someone for permission to do something on enemy territory why should i think that i am not allowed to do anything there why because putin will use nuclear weapons on children who are dying anyway it is our problem and us to decide how to kill this enemy in the war can and should be killed on his territory if our partners are afraid to use their weapons we will kill with ours but only as much as is

necessary on the battlefield discussed the day before deputy supreme commander-in-chief, president volodymyr zelenskyi informed about this in his evening address children very clearly as clearly as possible that in our southern regions they invest everything if they can to stop our soldiers and every thousand meters of advance every success of each of our combat brigades deserves gratitude everyone who goes to an assault on all those who repulse the enemy assault well done i am grateful to each of our soldiers bulgaria for the first time since the beginning of the russo-ukrainian war openly transferred weapons to ukraine as written the edition of europrojects is about a hundred soviet armored personnel carriers. bulgaria bought this equipment from the soviet union back in the 80s, since then they were on the balance

sheet of the ministry of internal affairs there . bulgaria also joined the eu-initiated project of joint procurement of ammunition by the european defense agency last year, despite the official refusal to help ukraine arms, the indirect export of ammunition and weapons from bulgaria to ukraine amounted to at least 1 billion dollars, it was reported, click, it's good , when everything is as you want, click and now you are in charge play, watch, go to tv shows, what we need, google, turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports, discounts on kombispasm and kombispasm gastrocomfort 10% in pharmacies podorozhnyk - bank

and savings, join the community with a ukrainian view of the world, become a sponsor of the youtube channel espresso and this is access to exclusive content, personal thanks, pinned comments , special icons there, the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click to sponsor and become part of the community with a ukrainian perspective. congratulations, this is freedom life on radio svoboda, we have already come to the very change, the following shots may shock you, news from the scene of events, live kamikaze drone attacks, political analysis objectively and meaningfully, there is no political season, exclusive interviews , reports from the hottest points of the svoboda front , frankly and impartially draw

your own conclusions events, the most important events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives, of course, the news feed reports on them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, you need to understand antin borkovskyi and the invitation experts soberly assess the events, analyze them by modeling our near future that saturdays at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10:00 p.m. studio event with anton borkovsky nayspresso de-occupation and how can we live now without stopping, it is unsurpassed the history of the liberated cities of ukraine are gone let's see how our brothers helped us

freed from a normal life freed from the normal technology of pro-russian inhumans terrible was very terrible every day burned one by two houses and natsiks of ukrainian people here we are a nationalist of people who resisted, residents came here, stopped and sent back and became heroes, the novel was, is and will always be ukraine about unbreakable cities of ukraine from the ukraine project in the documentary series de-occupation that on saturdays at 11:10 at espresso , the war continues and not only on the territory, it is also and the war for umy russia is throwing millions of oil dollars to turn ukrainians into little russians ukraine will become russia analysis and analysis of information about ukraine by russian propagandists concrete facts and methods

by which propaganda transforms the enemy people of obedient zombies are planning to vote residents of the ldr are resisting the information attacks of the russians in the project of the chronicle of the information war with olga len tuesday thursday friday at 17:10 on the espresso channel i welcome you on the espresso channel we used to say that we need a technological advantage over the enemy on the battlefield because technology really compensates or even outweighs the amount that the enemy has. well , as an example, one side has more manpower, and the other has more long-range means, the impression is more artillery that can grind this enemy force in the trenches and in the attack, and the own infantry at this time is safe and ready for further hostilities, such

asymmetric approaches are also in other directions , but this advantage is possible when the new solutions are used in the troops as a single exception, and systematically then really on on the battlefield, there will be qualitative changes in our favor, but this is where our reality does not look optimistic, because there are powerful and interesting technological asymmetric solutions to the actions of the enemy. however, they are in focus rather, our developers, and not exactly the armed forces, so the war our technologies for victory and the labyrinths of bureaucracy that we have to get rid of, we will talk about this in our wine program with the heads of two ukrainian companies that developed models that are already fighting but have not yet been adopted. of the defect express consulting company, which, together with espresso channels

, seeks to highlight the most relevant trends in the field of security and defense, and before i introduce our first interlocutor to make such a preamble in the 14th year, a small it group of professionals developed a system of intelligence and coordination of actions on the battlefield called kombat, then at the beginning of the war , the kombat system was used by our special operations forces, sso units from other law enforcement agencies, this system allowed tactical units to carry out their missions quickly , with minimal risks, with the help of the combat team , they also monitored the demarcation line with cameras in the ato zone in the interests of the general staff of the council of the national security and defense council, and on this system until the end, defense took place mariupol is already during the new active phase with the russian federation, now there is already a new

version of this system and it seems that everything is fine, but it always is , but even now we still have yevhen maksimenko, the project manager of the vision compat , mr. yevhen, i congratulate you, i am glad to see and hear you , i also congratulate you, i want to congratulate the audience would like to start such a general question about when we talk about modern technological solutions for the armed forces in the tactical level control system, maybe it does not look tempting to our viewers there, but still they have understand that the effectiveness of the units is not high due to an ineffective management system . so, what is your evidence? is there any such dynamic happening in the ukrainian army since the 14th year, when combat first appeared and the situation at the current stage? i would like, with your permission, to write to the audience first

what is the tactical level in general? and what does automation give or what does automation improve at the tactical level? from a soldier and a maximum to a battalion, and modern technological solutions at this level should be understood as the ability to plan in advance the course of a certain operation and then during its execution to have coordination between all actors in real time , namely, for example, to know where neighboring units are located and to avoid friendly fire and quickly choose the groups nearest to the enemy , respond to threats, know what the current task is for the execution of the groups of your neighbors , and know not only where they are. when they will approximately arrive at certain planned places in order to enter the battle synchronously to avoid the concentration of fire on one of your groups, and of course, it is quickly applied

to the targets, changes in the enemy's location and instant decisions to, as you said , have an advantage over quantitative by the prevailing authorities, another technological possibility provided by modern technologies. you have probably seen this in various videos of special units. it is an opportunity not only to adjust artillery a and e , to coordinate the actions of your own units with air through the prism of augmented reality from drones, this is especially useful for commanders of armored vehicles, who are absolutely from the corners in their field of vision inside the equipment, as well as , for example, by means of air defense, which are very difficult to see in the sky, e.e., small drones, and all these solutions are achieved by combining a certain software product with the infrastructure of connection with various sensors, drones, cameras, rangefinders into a single complex system of the tactical level, and to your question to your question. well, with the appearance of link, and thanks to the intensive activity

of volunteers to saturate the army with tablets, all these years, as of now, it can be stated that in most cases we have finally moved from paper maps to e -e electronic exchange of targets and the surrounding environment , but this does not work on the entire tactical segment of the front. that is, it is limited to the possibilities of using sterling e-e stalinska usually or stationary positions or some large equipment in a calm environment eh al- but if we talk about a fighter in the gray zone or even a motorized infantry unit in russia, then it is not possible there well, there is no way to use talink and at the moment we we only have certain play-maps with the opportunity to look at the general situation before the start of the battle, to exchange it, or while in certain trenches at stationary positions , to give certain targets that you see, to

artillery damage, but this is does not give you the dynamics of real-time data exchange, that is, in my opinion, the technological advantage is not only that you have a map and an understanding of the battlefield as of 15 minutes or half an hour ago, but it is the ability to uh-uh instantly make decisions and see uh-uh actual the situation and, moreover, the question remains as to how it will all work. when we start to take place in crimea where currently starlink does not work in principle and most systems, uh, well , in this case, that is, in fact, we are talking about the fact that kombat is just such a solution that allows to ensure combat operations in russia, the actions of the forces of the special operations forces in detachment and from stationary positions, not to be tied to the starlink and at the same time to have an effective exchange of data between all members

of this group if they have tracking devices which are created in the format of kombat vision correctly. so, for all these 11 years, we have been concentrating precisely on the direction of real-time coordination of units in the dynamics of standard radio communication in the absence of any infrastructure data transmission network, and we were just lucky to have access to the internet page, i wouldn't even imagine what would happen in the course of the war if we didn't have this means of communication at the moment, but this technology that we are doing is of little use to the general infantry, which usually holds certain stationary positions, and we now have it in every the cops are, roughly speaking, stalinka, but they are very suitable for the tasks of groups of these special operations forces or cheap in raid countermeasures, and when we talk about regular communication, you mean regular communication, real military communication, which is well protected, eh broadband with pp, whose other is motorola , which in principle can also be considered standard communication, and i'm sorry, i'm just used to calling standard radio communication exactly military communication, i.e. my opinion

is that motorola, as they say, were compromise options the beginning of the war when nothing they were better than analogues of radio stations, but this is a technology of the 90s that was not designed in principle for military use and it is more there for the coordination of some guards of some objects or there for the coordination of the airport and it does not allow you to implement realtime e - e exchange of multilateral all with all in real time mode and e-e by standard means of communication i mean military means of communication such as well let's assume charis then e-e coin systems like tvr silvis and others that allow you e-e not just a simplex voice to deploy on the battlefield, but also other services, then of course the question arises 11 years you have been doing the products there are several versions of these products

tested in the format of combat operations feedbacks of special operations forces of other structures absolutely positive on what question then how to proceed in the product how to implement it or is it on weapons, what is the obstacle and is there any economic benefit in cooperation with the ministry of defense when you create such a technological product, what should the company actually earn from it to make it difficult to service the product, etc. other, what does this unit of work of your company look like at the beginning of this process, the main problem was outdated legislation and the impossibility of legally formalizing the use of the product according to our current norms in the 70s on encryption legislation on other various issues

now, this process is moving more or less, but there are still problems of technical implementation, which i mentioned, that is, the lack or insufficient number of means of communication , plus the second technical problem is that the main mass drone that we we use a civilian drone that has a monitoring system for the user in civil mode and so on . and we are not systematically moving towards the creation of our own drone with phased eight or four-channel separate antennas that would be able to work in the rap suppression mode and all these technical problems are very narrowing the scope of application of products simply to the level of hm offline naps with marks with the possibility of point exchange on motorola once per

minute with one mark, this is if we talk about if we talk about the technical component, if we talk about the legal one, reset the interaction of the zno, then in our zsu there is still no strategic vision for the use of such systems and there is no such demand or how to tell the market in commercial terms, it is not clear what the customer wants and all the systems that currently exist on market, they simply improvise on their experience and impose some of their capabilities on the users, while the financing model for the existence of these projects mostly consists of some kind of volunteer meetings in the display of some cool achievements and the like, and uh, there is no clear order, except for several past corruption scandals , from the state and uh. in addition, in addition to the fact that

there is no order, there is no distribution of uh, uh, demands among potential manufacturers of similar solutions in order to avoid duplicating the implementation of the same functionality, now the developers are running towards the implementation of the functionality that is hyped, that is used and duplicated , the same type of projects appear. i just don’t want to name these projects, but there were a lot of projects in it is moving in one direction, it is not caused by the fact that people there are useful or want to do something. well, this is caused by the fact that no one is setting a certain company . in this direction, if such conditions existed, the developers would not try to compete with each other, because there are not so many developers on the market, as in principle the problem can be solved if this

process is systematized. well, as i understand it, there are actually a product that has already been tested, some of our brigades use the previous version of this product, they are satisfied, but it is more technologically complex than the versions that exist there, in particular, on the same nettle, which in principle is a static product, as i understand it from the point of view of use, and a dynamic combat product like this is needed forces of special operations and on the advancing brigades, and so far there is no national product and you say that the ministry of defense does not understand, but it must understand what i say that if we advance, we must to increase efficiency, to implement digital methods that we needed there and today, tomorrow, and the day after tomorrow, and then we come to the concept that we need to create such an information field so that both the military and industry and experts raise this topic and , in principle, accompany it to its result , which will first of all satisfy the armed forces that is, as you understand, it is necessary to add such an expert here, a professional there, the dynamics

of the discussion of this issue, they seem to understand it and are even interested. now they began to realize that they have e-tishniks and began to accumulate them in certain separate units, but the problem of such a movement is that first of all they accumulate them in order to first accumulate people and then understand what they will do and not under some specific projects, and secondly, for those who already have worked out solutions, and who are not state manufacturers, it is not clear how to interact with such units, that is, on the one hand, the state does not order anything and is not ready to buy, on the other hand, it has a pool of some human resources and accumulated mobilized it specialists, but it is impossible to legally cooperate with him because a civil servant under

our legislation is not only unable to perform any tasks in a commercial project, he cannot even be involved in some joint states on private projects because the plane of this state private partnership exists only in the fake form of a certain law that is not effective, that is, in fact. as i understand it, your company has developed a product, this product can be used , but now there are no interaction mechanisms, that is or you need to make an order, in order to make an order, you need to go through tests, e-e, in accordance with the requirements to be written by the ministry of defense. the ministry of defense does not want to write the requirements for this complex product, and you do not know where to go. the key point is that writing the product is only roughly speaking 10-20% of the entire problem at the narcotic level, the main problem is in its further implementation in order to

introduce this product in large quantities brigades and the like, it is necessary to have a large number of people who will travel along these brigades and the like, and it would be logical to use, for example, the same military it units to engage in such promotion, but they do not legally have the right to do this if this project is not an internal state project, that is, the only way now to interact with the ministry of defense, if you have a product, is simply to give it to us for free for the use of the ministry of defense, and not to mobilize internally and develop it from the inside, that is, this is what i have on attention, from the real legal ways, there are only such ways, any option to show that you have a product that meets the requirements and for the ministry of defense to create a team to implement such a product, they rest on the question and why this particular product? well , there is no reason to choose a product another product , there are no tenders or orders

, well, that is, there is no plane to determine why the military should introduce certain products and others not, well, that is , we need some kind of decision that is somewhat higher than initiatives of the ministry of defense, as in particular, there is a ministry of digital transformation, but it should be above the ministry, but on the other hand, when we look at the work of american units , we know that there will be a system. yes, that is , in fact, the devices that are in every combat vehicle even these systems are transferred like this, even from bradley to our armed forces , does it not mean that our military is simply waiting for these systems to increase in the transferred equipment, and this quantitative indicator then forms just the requirement that okay, we are moving to the american system and we don't need national developers, er, i don't think i communicate with all , well, with the majority of these users, and

there are several problems with this approach, one of the main problems is that until now the distribution and registration of users controls the representatives of the foreign army. that is, it is not a very good option when you are in the trenches . you need to register a new user and you have to write an application to the pentagon . functional and has a lot implementation of the applied functionality, it is extremely difficult for the threshold of the average entry of our user. that is, this tool is excluded , well, in most cases, it is also for special operations forces for certain layers of users . this is one of such problems. operations that have probably been using the system since the 18th year and this was one of the reasons why we

stopped implementing our previous generation, they still have not fully learned how to use it it is very complicated, that is, your decision, if you were to implement a competition between your development and the american system. and you are convinced that a ukrainian user would make a plus or a bet on your system. if you compare the systems, roughly speaking, by the amount of functionality , the american system will definitely win because it was developed first and developed by an entire american institute, then it is now supported by many enthusiasts from various european countries, but if you talk about the implementation of certain specific tasks, for example, there is a task, there are bluffers standing king, you just see where are the nearby tanks and what are they doing? in our system, it is much easier for the user to understand than in a similar system in this american one. looking at

what the comparison criteria will be, mr. yevgeny, i think that we will return to this topic with you in our next programs from the point of view of the digital e-e army and increasing the effectiveness of our units on the battlefield. and now i have to stop our conversation to thank you for joining the broadcast and remind our viewers that evgeny maksymenko, head of the kombat vision project, was an effective presso the program adds strength to our military on the boyko field, especially when we talk about special operations forces, and later in our program there will be another thing that we mention less. from the examples when one of our tanks left to perform a combat mission under the pincer but could not perform this work because this connection disappeared for what reasons, what conclusions to draw and how to prevent this, we will talk in the second part of our program