[000:00:00;00] we finished our first part of the marathon with andrii seichuk, we will return with him at 2:00 p.m. and then we will tell you what happened during that time. well, now it’s angelika’s time . she will tell you what’s on our information news field. thank you, colleagues. i will tell you about the consequences of the shelling by the russians of mykolaiv oblast, zaporizhzhia and kharkiv oblast. and how many occupiers did our defenders destroy ? 5008 days of heroic resistance of the ukrainian people to the russian occupiers continues in the artery of news on espresso in the studio angelika sezonko under enemy fire again

mykolaiv that after seven in the morning artillery shells arrived as expected, the head of the region, vitaliy kim, reported . as a result, the windows of an apartment building were damaged, according to preliminary information, there were no victims, but in zaporizhzhia , one person was injured as a result of the night shelling, according to the secretary of the city council, anatolii kurtyev, in one of the districts of the city, there are no victims. the light was also damaged , the infrastructural object was damaged by the blast wave in the nearby buildings, the windows were blown out , the russian occupiers struck kharkiv at night four s-300 rockets were fired at the city from the territory of the belgorod region, two of them exploded in the air, the rest hit the ground, the explosion blew out the windows in a four- story building. fortunately, people survived, informed the head of the regional military administration, oleg synogubov. of enemy shelling, one civilian was killed, another was injured. also, a private

house was damaged there. it was a bad morning for the occupiers in the temporarily occupied crimea. the authorities of sevastopol said that the air defense forces and the navy repel the attack of the enemy uavs, the so-called governor of the city mykhailo entertains in reported that the drone was attacked by the peninsula above the sea in the chersonese region of the sevastopol bay and balaclavas 9 strikes on the market concentrated personnel of the russians struck during the day ukrainian aviation also our defenders during seven enemy reconnaissance drones and two anti-aircraft defense vehicles were destroyed during the day, the general staff reported that, in addition, the soldiers destroyed two ammunition depots and five artillery installations four areas of concentration of manpower and the same number of radio electronic stations, more than two companies killed and wounded lost the invader of the past era in

the direction of tavria. and the enemy also got rid of six units of equipment and three warehouses of ammunition. this was reported by the commander of the operational strategic group of troops tavria, oleksandr tarnavsky, the muscovites attacked 16 times ukrainian positions and fired 536 shots in response, the artillery units of our defenders performed almost 1,300 fire missions, an extraordinary phenomenon at the height of the july the heat in ukraine caused half a thousand russians to burn to the point of coals, and this was only for a day, and they helped the occupiers to even out their tan. eight tanks, seven armored combat vehicles, eight cars and two units of special equipment were burned to ashes

, as well as 18 artillery systems, one rsv and 13 unmanned aerial vehicles, the data are approximate remind the general staff that at least 2,000 people were forced to leave their homes due to a forest fire on the island of lapalman, which is part of the spanish canary islands. the ignition occurred the day before in the morning in a forested area in the north. the rapid spread of the fire was facilitated by droughts. 40-degree heat and strong wind. the fire in a short time destroyed at least 11 residential buildings, according to the latest data, four and a half thousand hectares of land have already been damaged, the spanish army has involved 150 of its firefighters to help local civil rescuers on the island they are also sending teams from the neighboring

island of tenerife, let me remind you that in 2021, the cumbre vieha volcano erupted on the island, then the elements destroyed about two thousand houses, hundreds of soldiers at the front, in addition to severe injuries, also received psychological injuries , can help in rehabilitation, hippotherapy in the odesa center is used as modern trends our correspondents saw their effectiveness in horse training and own methods. this man, like many other ukrainians , worked in agriculture and grew bread before the war however, back in 2014, i decided to defend ukraine , i received my first wound at the very beginning of hostilities, now my husband is rehabilitating, horse training helps. the first question i had was that i fell asleep in the dugout . such a big one in particular brought a fairy tale for two into my back, if it weren't for the wired girls, i wouldn't be riding without a saddle anymore, it helps to restore the back because

the rider feels the amplitude of the ru, it affects the musculoskeletal system, the muscles and the spine however such exercises should be performed only under the supervision of a specialist, when a person sits on a horse and also does some exercises without a saddle, he automatically learns to keep his balance without straining at the same time. and when some exercises are added, it really makes our neurons work faster. in this equestrian club for more than 16 years, they have been successfully practicing hippotherapy among children who need needles for cerebral palsy and autism, communication with horses improves their physical and psychological condition, recently this technique has also been used for treatment of military sailors, this is a method that has been proven in world practice, this is a program that is used in israel and the usa at the state level, that is, soldiers and veterans go through this

complex for free, and for us this practice is new, i can see from our results that it is really effective, not all horses are suitable for animal hippotherapy must have a calm temperament, not be afraid of loud sounds and sudden movements in the equestrian club where they work with wounded soldiers, two horses lobster are used alternately for their lonya and raphael lonya he is younger he is more active he it is more suitable for those who are also active, but everyone still loves him, everyone loves to ride him and he is more emotional, and he is so very good, the return from him is good in the emotional plan, and raphael is more comfortable because he is not so tall and has a wider back art therapists and psychologists work in the center with fighters. many of them need psychological help, some have difficulty even communicating. traditional office psychotherapy requires at least 10

sessions to bring a person out of such a state , but when they start riding horses, they smile they appear on the faces already after the third class, they tell in the center that they are possible there ptsr yes, they already have a diagnosis and they have contusions and so on, but with all this, ideas and depression, well, they are depressive states, and hippotherapy copes with this simply hurrah now the popularity of hippotherapy has grown so much that the queue is forming for several months ahead , so it became necessary to open additional psychological support centers, two more such institutions may appear in odessa and mykolaiv

from odessa arina nebohid for the espresso tv channel this hour, please stay with the press. greetings, dear viewers of the espresso tv channel, the studio program, the event , we will analyze the most important events of this week and try to predict how they will affect our next weeks, our guests today are matthew bryza and andriy biankovsky, our first guest is advisor to the secretary of state of the united states former director of european and eurasian affairs at the national security council of the united states matthew bryza greetings dear mr. ambassadors in the studio of the espressov tv channel, the key story is this the consequences of the great summit in vilnius would like to ask you why president joseph biden still did not dare to push the so-called very clear pro-ukrainian order denis, in particular, it is about the direct membership of ukraine in nato, please decipher this extremely important strategic discussion, the strategic consequences of its cream not only for of ukraine, but for the security

of the entire central and certainly not only central europe, the strategic consequences are large and positive both for ukraine and for nato at the beginning of the russian invasion of ukraine in in february 2022, such a result could only be dreamed of, remember how friends and future allies of ukraine hesitated to provide any significant military assistance today we have a promise j7 to continue providing significant military assistance and a clear commitment of the united alliance to support ukraine as long as it will not defeat russia, but considering this and the fact that i was present at the bucharest summit in april 2008, i was disappointed by the position of president biden and olaf schultz , whose predecessor angela merkel blocked membership action plan for ukraine and georgia in bucharest, there have now been reports that the usa and germany did not agree

to cooperate with other allies regarding wording that would emphasize that ukraine will receive an invitation as soon as the war is over, this is a strategic mistake and, unfortunately, experience the bucharest summit did not help us to avoid it, we understand that putin started a local war for a reason putin started an almost existential war on which the existence of ukraine will depend and will depend on it the borders of the western world in the east and so on and so on. well, in your opinion, how hard would president joseph biden be willing to play ? yes, we understand that, well, for ukraine, membership is secured, first of all, that this is the fifth article , at the moment we are receiving analogues, in particular, it is about security guarantees but security guarantees are not the same as the fifth article above all uncertainty is always crucial

in cases where security guarantees that do not comply with the fifth article are difficult to predict and will never tell us when the united states will resort to force in the case of ukraine, because it is already in a state of severe war , but it is strategic, but it is because of the fear that putin will provoke the third world war or that he can declare that russia is at war with nato, but putin is already doing it , he is threatening with nuclear weapons and we feel his bluff, he once again tells everyone that russia is not at war with ukraine, but with the entire alliance, so i really don't know what president biden is afraid of, he just has a certain emotional fear of his involvement in a nuclear conflict, national security advisor jake sullivan encourages president biden to move in the right direction, but on this so far, the military support that the united states has provided to ukraine is absolutely unprecedented, and the united states

, together with great britain, led the alliance . the problem is that such self-restraint or the fear of provoking a direct conflict with russia has led to the fact that a significant part of significant aid came to ukraine too late, if all this had been provided to ukraine from the very beginning, ukraine would be in a much better position on the battlefield than it is today, and therefore put pressure on ukraine to start its a counteroffensive without air cover appears to be a very unreasonable decision from a military point of view, which greatly complicates the life of ukraine. i do not want to be ungrateful, because in general, we in ukraine pay tribute to our western friends, our western partners, if it were not for their timely help, most of the people would have been killed. we understand that it would have been as big as the sodus, there would have been a rout, many would have been shot, someone would have been demonstrably executed or

hanged, but we received help and at the same time we are also aware that this help is possible at the same time, we do not understand enough that in order to strategically decide the course of the company, we need aviation, the same f-16s, in order to destroy the enemy's logistics centers. we need etecams systems above the commander-in-chief of the main command of the armed forces of ukraine, general zaluzhny speaks very clearly about this, in particular in those interviews who came out at the event, we understand that the pentagon and the white house understand what general zaluzhny was talking about, as i already mentioned, it is really unreasonable and imprudent for us in the usa and nato to put pressure on ukraine or make certain judgments about the speed of its counteroffensive to be able to justify further military support especially when we are not ready to provide f-16 fighters to provide the air shield that is so necessary for a successful offensive or counteroffensive so when it comes to military

planning we take steps that are not entirely rational in relation to attacks of course they absolutely necessary to increase the range of artillery fire. we remember how, even before the usa provided heimers, russian artillery simply blew up ukrainian cities and how after the first days of their work, russia was forced to stop its harsh tactics of war crimes, that is why we cannot do without attacks . if we want to be able to hit russian high-altitude targets that threaten ukraine, answering your question, why have they not delivered them yet, again, i think it is about self-fire the biden administration is afraid that if f16 is given, russia will declare that it is at war with nato and will dare to escalate, because russia did nothing when the west crossed all its red

lines regarding military support for ukraine in relation to the attacks, the fear is that a longer range could allow ukraine to hit targets on the territory of russia, which could potentially lead to an expansion of the geography of the war, this argument is false because , firstly, ukraine has promised not to do this, and secondly, because that ukraine is already striking the territory that russia illegally considers to be russian, either on the four temporarily annexed regions or on the crimea, so the arguments that the biden administration uses to convince itself why not should we increase military aid are counterproductive and simply do not make any sense. returning to the previous question, i understand why nato is not ready to invite ukraine to join the alliance as soon as the war ends, because it can give putin an excuse to continue the war as long as possible, but he has already decided to do it anyway. this is also just a diversionary maneuver we should have given ukraine more clarity about when

it will be invited to nato and we definitely should have provided f16 and attacks long before how ukraine launched its counteroffensive biden's courage will be enough biden understands putin's calculations well, despises him , calls him a war criminal, after all, which he is. russia is trying to restrain itself because it is trying to maintain the integrity of nato. he knows that germany does not really want to go as far as he would like, while poland or the baltic countries are ready to go much further. further in accelerating ukraine's accession to nato and providing them with the necessary weapons he knows that putin plans to buy as much time as possible in the hope that nato will give a crack therefore biden

is trying to secure the alliance even if his steps seem to me here in istanbul to be quite restrained dear matthew i know what you know how the russians work, in particular , it is about certain negotiating points, and actually i would like to ask you now about certain dynamics, in particular, it is about what putin came up with at the beginning of the war, what proposals and what are his current proposals, how much have putin's appetites changed or fallen, on the other hand, we understand that we in ukraine have a very clear and transparent position, we demand the return of our lands, we demand compensation for our losses, putin's goals have changed from his truly insane desire to seize kyiv in just a few days and essentially destroy the ukrainian nation to the point of simply holding on and preventing the destruction of its military on the battlefield until the united states and its nato allies and

other friends around the world will get tired of helping ukraine, putin's goals are now only criminal , as soon as you can imagine, it is no longer a genocidal desire to destroy the ukrainian nation, now they are aimed at his personal survival. in the war, you are torn to pieces by the ukrainians and their western friends who supply powerful weapons and here you see, say , in bakhmut, a group of your former comrades doing the most extreme thing that you as a soldier in principle, you could imagine that it is about treason, about an attempt to overthrow the government, but putin turns a blind eye to this, are they now allowed to roam freely, or could something even more deeply undermine the morale of the russian armed forces? there are many people around putin who clearly want him to leave, and that is why i

i think that now his goal is simply to survive. what we clearly do not appreciate enough in ukraine's struggle against russia is how much it has done for us militarily. timothy, a brilliant financial and strategic analyst , made a comment a few days ago during a meeting at which i attended, he said that the united states invested $50 billion in military support for ukraine, but ukrainian soldiers destroyed much more russian equipment and worsened russia's military potential, which is several times more than the $50 billion that the united states provided to ukraine. so, from a socio-economic point of view the investment of the united states in the ukrainian army was deeply in the interests of the united states and in our interests, of course, for ukraine not only to survive but also to win this war, since

it became a member of nato, we understand that we we are in a state of war, in fact, a beastly war, extremely difficult, and the west is somehow trying not to get involved in the second one, because we also see certain trends, there is a feeling that strategically, russia can no longer offer anything in order to achieve this or that victory. she can only prolong the war, and here she feels history how long can they drag out the war because putin is pretending to be ready to wage an almost century-long war against ukraine against the west and so on , of course the question of resources well, we understand that resources russian and ukrainian resources are one thing, but the resources of, for example, the euro-atlantic community and putin’s resources are not comparable things. so, dear mr. post, how long can putin try to continue the war , since putin is losing this war, he is ready to wage it until someone

stops him from a strategic point of view in terms of view , he has definitely suffered the biggest defeat in the history of russia since the collapse of the soviet union. a neighboring post-soviet state that is an alternative to putin's criminal kleptocratic regime and this is putin's biggest fear a successful democratic prosperous ukraine that will eventually become a member of nato he cannot stop this process so he will continue to fight as long as possible hoping that ukraine will tire of all of us the united states and our allies in the west, we will get tired and stop providing support to ukraine, but this will never happen, the russian economy is rapidly deteriorating, revenues from the sale of hydrocarbons in the first quarter of this year were 47% lower than last

year, the budget deficit is increasing, the ruble has fallen sharply in value, and there is also an attempt at a coup putin, to put it mildly, is scared, he is doing something he has never done before, for example, he is trying to show the russian people that he loves him. that is why he is going to dirbentu hugs people there and this is when even his closest advisers before meeting him have to be quarantined for two weeks because he is so paranoid afraid of getting sick putin scared and will continue to fight until will be able to, but he doesn't have long left, largely thanks to the amazing bravery and victory of ukrainian soldiers and the help of friends and future nato allies . we should not flinch at his next mention of nuclear weapons. he was cornered during prigozhin's uprising. and what did he do? he got scared and let prigozhin go, and he probably showed mercy to his soldiers, that is, when he was cornered, he

simply surrendered, so putin's red lines worthless ambassadors, i would like to ask you about the best security guarantee scenario for ukraine well, i would not like the history of the so-called budapest memorandum to repeat itself from a rational point of view as you said about the budapest memorandum, none of these promises matter if nato and other friends ukraine will not demonstrate a real readiness to provide ukraine with any military support it needs in order to prevent the victory of russia , at the moment we see unprecedented assistance in the form of military weapons in in the future, everything will be different, a whole network of ties in the field of political security will be connected with ukraine, and the most important thing will be membership in nato, which will simultaneously mean that an attack on ukraine will be an attack on the entire alliance , and until we achieve this, the main thing is that nato and the united

the states and their friends, such as japan and south korea, convincingly assured that if everything continues as it is now , there will be a coalition of willing countries that will not just watch from the sidelines. there were talks that some nato members could provide military assistance on the ground. it is reported that when putin threatened to use nuclear weapons, bill benz, the head of the cia, went to moscow and said that if you do this, the united states will intervene militarily and eventually destroy your army . if putin uses tactical nuclear weapons, the united states will destroy the russian army, this is a real security guarantee that putin did not neglect, and it is much more important than any words in nato communiques

or any memorandum we can in ukraine to trust our american friends for ikusullivan and william burns, you know those people, i would ask you to describe them, of course i had the opportunity to work for white benz several times, he is one of the most creative , humble, reliable diplomats, officials and people i have ever met, he can be trusted for everything 100%, like jake salliwa jake is clear in his statements when everyone outside the white house tries to catch him asking do you want ukraine to win he answers very carefully and consistently saying we want to strengthen ukraine so that it does not suffer a defeat, to strengthen it so that it is ready for negotiations with russia to end the war. so he is honest , you can trust him, at the same time, his strategic foundation can be undermined by the threats of russia and putin, and it seems sad that he has not learned in the lessons of the history of eastern europe, i mean the ukraine of the baltic countries and poland, he did not delve into the history of what professor

snyder calls the bloody lands, without such an understanding, one cannot learn the most important lesson which is that the language that a soviet or russian leader understands is the language of fear if they can instill fear in us they will continue to press if we can instill fear in them they will stop this is a lesson that i think jake has not yet learned about the white benz which was my supervisor in moscow, i think he understands all this very well no, it’s not just the position for which seleva, it is somewhat different from the position held , for example, by colonel house over 100 years ago, we understand that these are people close to the presidents, these people who influence formation of foreign policy has absolutely well there is 99% confidence of its president but i heard some strange signals and sometimes i got the impression that jake sullivan rather slows down

certain initiatives on the part of the secretary of state anthony blinkin and the head of the pentagon, you need to understand how the foreign policy of the united states works at that level i actually spent four years on the national security council staff under president bush, and my day-to-day duties included assisting then- national security advisor condoleezza rice therefore, the work of the national security adviser is primarily to advise and direct the thoughts of the president, because secretary of state blinkin may have one opinion , the minister of defense may have another opinion, the director of the cia benz may have another opinion, and the minister of finance ellen may have another opinion. in the end, all these points of view must be coordinated and reconciled with the only person who makes decisions is president biden. so , jake sullivan's job is to coordinate all meetings, discuss the point of view, and present them to president biden

to explain them and advise him, because he is the national security advisor, and therefore wait for the decision to be made by the president, which is happening. i think that it is president biden who is guided by an ambiguous fear of provoking putin to the third world war . he is afraid that putin will use nuclear weapons, which, in my opinion, is a manifestation self-restraint biden is also afraid to give putin another reason to accuse nato of the fact that it is the alliance that is his opponent in this war, not ukraine, and finally, biden is really afraid that he will not be able to maintain nato's solidarity with regard to ukraine question, he understands well that the nato countries and other partners were able to provide such decisive assistance for ukraine only thanks to their solidarity, it is precisely this that weakens putin and makes it clear that his main goal in this war has failed with a collapse, instead, he received an increased, stronger nato, more united from ukraine which is on the way to membership . he did not see such a thing in his wildest

dreams. therefore, he is fully aware that in order to achieve the goals i have listed, he must support the unity of nato and if he insists on the hopes that other nato members are considered too provocative, it risks leading to the disintegration of nato, which is unacceptable for ukraine. thank you very much, dear mr. embassy, ​​for this extremely frank and interesting conversation, and i want to remind our tv viewers that matthew bryce , the extraordinary secretary of state of the united states, the former director of the espresso tv channel, worked for them now in fact, europe and eurasia in the national security council of the usa thank you glory to ukraine there are discounts on karsil tablets 15% in pharmacies traveller, you and save pain can become