[000:00:00;00] the national bank of ukraine if it makes such a decision dear colleagues, we have finished discussing this draft law above yes then please 1 minute one minute - this is the father please dear colleagues in no case can you support this draft law what is business business is when an enterprise takes certain risks understanding these risks , it can make a profit or a loss . unfortunately, some ukrainian enterprises did business with russia. it was allowed. i don't blame them. the state allowed it, but they understood that it involved certain risks in including legislative risks and when there were certain export transactions, the legislation was such that they understood that in the event of any situation that they would not simply

be returned, they would not return the revenue, but they would have to pay these fines. these are the risks that they themselves took to us it is not possible to encourage those who traded with russia, while others deliberately chose not to trade, thank you, please, more vlasenko, 1 minute after that, let's vote , please, serhii volodymyrovych yes, thank you, mr. chairman, i want to remind you that the war has begun not in the 22nd year, but in the 14th, and this law says that it is necessary to grant benefits to those who during the war traded with the aggressor countries with the russian federation. i consider this absolutely unacceptable. and by the way , we are told that it is so difficult for them to withdraw from of currency control, to withdraw from currency control, just get a certificate from the chamber of commerce and industry, transfer it to the bank and have the bank accept it and remove it from currency control, and there are no issues with this if we want to look at and provide benefits to our business, which is really

suffering today. and there is really a problem with the return foreign exchange earnings in connection with the war, so let's look at these questions at the business that did not violate moral conditions and moral obligations, previous colleagues said that trade with russia was not prohibited then, he is 100% right, but even now there is no formal ban on trade with russia, that is why talking about the fact that we encourage those who continue who then traded during the war with russia is unacceptable, thank you dear colleagues, we are concluding the discussion of this draft law , we are moving on to making a decision, i put the proposal to be accepted as a basis with elaboration provisions in accordance with the first part of article 116 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine draft law on amending article 16 of the law of ukraine on currency and currency transactions regarding liability for violation of settlement periods by residents for transactions with exports for export registration number 90 230

dear colleagues, please vote for 221 decisions not taken dear colleagues, i generally propose to send draft law 9230 for a repeated first reading, ready to vote, i ask people's deputies to vote for 241 decisions taken thank you further dear colleagues, the draft law has been sent for a repeat first reading, the following draft law 81-85 is a draft law on amending some legislative acts of ukraine regarding the use

of unmanned aerial vehicles by law enforcement agencies and countering their illegal use, this is the second reading dear colleagues , we agreed that this will be the speech of the faction tsymbalyuk's homeland, then two amendments from the eu, two amendments from khlopak, two amendments from klymenko, and we vote. volodymyrivna please no tsymbalyuk yes please tsymbalyuk mykhailo mykhailovych mykhailo tsymbalyuk homeland dear colleagues, first of all i want to thank all those who participated in finalizing this draft law for the second reading, i will remind you that we are expanding the powers of the national police , the state border service, the security service

and other law enforcement agencies surveillance and control by unmanned aerial vehicles, this is extremely important, because during the period of martial law, this is the challenge that our defense forces and other military forces face formations that today are involved in the protection of the state, we also give the national police the authority to control those unmanned vehicles that are used on the water, this is also the challenge that needs to be regulated today at the level of this law. we also took into account all the proposals that came from the defense forces from the armed forces of ukraine, which our combat units face on the frontline while defending and recapturing our territories, it is no secret that today this

is the challenge that our fighters face, and sometimes the fate of a second depends on the fact that to save the lives of our military by understanding whether this drone is friendly, that is, our armed forces of other military formations or this drone belongs to the enemy . i propose and ask all people's deputies to support this draft law and vote for it in the second reading so that it enters into force as soon as possible and

helps our armed forces with other forces of defense to liberate our territory from the enemy, thank you, thank you, please, two amendments from the eu faction, who will put their amendments , and i see a representative of the committee , please take the sum of the number of the amendment, just say it right away. in principle, from the very beginning, it was very correct, because it was intended to prevent the intelligence tools of the aggressor state or possible saboteurs near the border, near the border line, and over the objects of the border service, you turned in fact, on the law that applies to all objects of both the border service and the national police, the security

service, and the communications security service, and what's more, you don't limit it to the period of martial law, the previous speaker said that it's important to do it now. i absolutely agree. let's do it. this is exactly my amendment 120, it concerns precisely the restriction - it is during the period of martial law and this is not the only such amendment, i ask you to answer why you are not doing this and please put a confirmation thank you, victoria the only thing, look, i will clarify right away 120 is not your amendment, your amendment 122 your amendment 122 well, look, i don't know in that table what we have 122 the amendment i am here is also open to the site dear colleagues dear colleagues see mrs. victoria you can

only put your amendment yours 122 126 i think we will follow them well, please check the committee 122 126 122 well, i also downloaded only 6 from the site well, i won't check the site now, look in the documents that i have that are printed 122 126 ms. the summary is correct therefore, please, on the 122nd give an answer and then on the 126th you will ask and then please er thank you dear colleagues this certificate has been rejected i want to draw your attention to the fact that er this bill regulates not only the issues of the state border service and all law enforcement agencies we are now also in the premises of the supreme council, which is guarded

by the state security department of the security service of ukraine, accordingly, this draft law gives the authority to work to the entire range of law enforcement agencies, not only the state border service, if you pay attention to the name of the draft law clearly states that it concerns law enforcement agencies, moreover, i would like to note that this draft law exclusively concerns law enforcement agencies and does not regulate the issue of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by society, journalists and other scientists there. we agreed not to regulate this with this draft law. thank you, the committee rejected amendment 122 and 126, it applied exclusively to border guards, we provide such powers and security services of the ministry of internal affairs. thank you, dear colleagues, amendment 122

authorship people's deputy kissyumer rejected by the committee eh, have you heard the arguments of the parties, i put 122 amendment into consideration , i ask you to vote for 102, the decision was not adopted, the next amendment 126 please, mrs. viktoria, thank you, we are exactly on the table on the website, it is not fundamental now, numbering is fundamental ms. ionushas what are you they said yes, you added the security service police to the second reading, this was not the case in the first reading, you regulate a lot, but again, i asked you about the period of martial law, you do not limit the practice to shoot down any drone over any police station and

at any time , even after the war, just for awareness was not limited, for example, freedom of assembly, the constitutional rights of citizens, and you reject it, a country that survived the maidan has no right to allow the arbitrariness of law enforcement agencies, especially after the war, colleagues, i think that, well , he is simply implementing such an approach by dictation dear colleagues, the 126th amendment authored by syumar was rejected by the committee, i ask you to determine, vote for 83, the decision was not made. thank you, all the amendments from the eu, no more, please, fraction vote

, two amendments, the book, and two amendments . these are amendments 75 and 79, they are related to each other. we insist that it is necessary to single out and enshrine at the level of the air code of ukraine the right of journalists to use drones up to 20 kg in journalistic activities without the need registration of such aircraft in the state register, but on the condition that such drones are registered with relevant entities in the field of media, i.e. editorial offices or being owned by a journalist, this will avoid potential problems with the use of drones by journalists, in particular for the purpose of preparing anti-corruption investigations and preventing illegal restrictions on journalistic activity and i emphasize that this applies to the norms of peacetime and non-wartime, this amendment is very important to ensure

the independence of journalistic activity, please support, thank you, the position of the committee, please, briefly, very briefly. dear colleagues, when we spoke and voted for the first reading together with oleksandra ustinov, we agreed that dear colleagues, this bill does not regulate the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by society, journalists, scientists , it only regulates the issue of use by law enforcement agencies. first, second , you are talking about the register. we removed any indication about the register before the second reading, which allows them to be used freely in society. there is no indication about the register. only the powers of law enforcement agencies, so if this amendment is taken into account, it violates the law because there is no register and we cannot make any changes to the register even for journalists, that is, the position of the committee is to be rejected, we will regulate the issue of use by journalists after the end of martial law as dear colleagues of the 75th the amendment of the people's deputy , the boy, was rejected by the committee, the position of the parties, you heard, i am putting

the 75th amendment to the vote, i ask you to vote for 100, the decision has not been made, but can i immediately 79 maxim put to give the floor, can i immediately let's conduct them. moreover, in the reply, i want to note that currently the air kolodex allows only recreational activity for leisure, but journalistic activity is not recreational activity, this professional activity is an independent separate branch of government, that's why i proposed, taking into account in the editorial board of the first reading, they proposed to remove recreational activity to separate journalistic activity as separately protected, thank you, i put the 79th amendment authored by maksym the boy on

- it was rejected by the committee, please vote for 91, the decision was not made. thank you. yes, maksym, you have just a second, we still have amendments to take into account, please two amendments klymenko yulia leonidivna, please name the numbers, only one is writing to me, dear mp klymenko, insert the card, inserted please, do not insert your microphone, it did not turn on because

it is not on the card, try, have you inserted the card, yulia leonidovna, you need to insert a card there and it doesn’t work, well, the card worked, it works, they want to listen to me dear colleagues, in principle , i have a lot of edits, there are about 50. of the code, they do not even have to be voted on, but i would like to say that before this law, first of all, it is not a law about the national guard and drones, as well as the ministry of internal affairs and the police, this is only a small part of this law, in fact, this law makes conceptual changes in the air code and why it got into the law enforcement committee and not transport

to infrastructure, one can only wonder because we have had a law similar in text for a year and a half, it was called 37-16 and it really introduced systemic amendments in accordance with the eu directive to the air code where unmanned aircraft were regulated, please position of the committee briefly very briefly our committee was forced to meet again in order to remove any changes to the air code based on the fact that recently the verkhovna rada dear colleagues, you and i voted on the bill others that passed the committee our dear colleague of the transport committee , yuriy kisyl, and accordingly, the bill is amended, we immediately voted with you on the bill as the basis for this

bill as a whole, any changes to the air the code is not introduced, and therefore it concerns the law enforcement system, therefore the committee's position will be rejected. thank you, dear colleagues. the 14th amendment was rejected by the committee, authorship of yuli leonidivna klymenko, and you will not put it. volodymyrivna, we agreed, only there will be amendments. no, you have the right . well , there are simply agreements. there is a right, please. holy right, please, iryna volodymyrivna dear colleagues, i am rejecting the two amendments of the 43rd and 45th, which we are talking about here , it is about permanently banning any flights of unmanned aerial vehicles,

including on of the security services of ukraine above police stations . excuse me. not a single drone says that it is a drone of journalists, and when we later ask why we are not in nato, it is possible because we do not have freedom of speech. and this bill blocks journalistic there are no investigations and anti-corruption investigations, because no journalist will now be able to launch a drone in order to find out about uh, illegal parks , there are new ones in the security services of ukraine or in the national police . only the head of the sbu, i think that is why this draft law was moved. iryna volodymyrivna, amendment 43-45, they are not taken into account and are rejected, therefore you cannot put them on confirmation because they are

rejected. i apologize once again, i say these the amendments are rejected. and for confirmation, you can put an amendment from kyiv, therefore . dear colleagues, we are moving on to making a decision, but this is somehow the case. dear colleagues, i am making a proposal . i am making a proposal. legislative acts of ukraine regarding the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by law enforcement agencies and combating their illegal use, registration number 81 85 are ready to vote simply people's deputies vote in favor of 263 the decision was adopted in favor of a specific one in general show by fractions and we agreed to immediately

adopt without amendments 8235 therefore i put a proposal to adopt in the second reading and in general with the necessary technical legal amendments the draft law on amendments and supplements to the criminal code of ukraine on the elimination of contradictions in penalty of criminal violations, registration number 8235, i put the proposal to accept in the second reading and in general with the necessary technical legal amendments simply popular deputies to vote for 281 decisions, the law was adopted as a whole oleksandr serhiyovych, please let's move on to the next item on the agenda, also the second

reading, and that too i understand serhiy kostiantynovych, you continue to be a medyanik , please vyacheslav anatolych medyanik you see how the hall of friendship dawns a bill with a registration number 7354 draft law on amendments to the code of ukraine on administrative offenses regarding the introduction of administrative liability in the field of training and admission of drivers to drive vehicles by the means of the second reading, we agreed that there would be corrections from the voice and hryhoriy mykolayovych, mother has a thorough position for three minutes, we are talking mykolayovych , you are ready to voice her for two two minutes, please, and the right to exclusively put yes, no need , fine, 2 minutes, mother, then voice correction no, and then 2

minutes, mom, and let's vote. far away. don't separate, please, please. mom , 2 minutes, the opportunity to speak two times instead of 20 minutes, and for tips on how not to make corrections, i am turning to the people's deputies , what is really wrong with corrupt people for money they sell law training and everything else, and drivers commit traffic accidents and violate traffic rules in our country, it is necessary to fight, fight in two cases, or take away driver's licenses based on the law, or retrain, but the two criteria i mentioned are currently absent in by law and by the authors of the draft law, there are also no questions about whether it will solve this problem that with money you can buy education or passing an exam with this law

, the answer is no. as it was sold, so it will be sold. i want to note that this law does not solve the main issue, if a driving school receives a license, accreditation to carry out certain actions, namely training , namely quality training with the participation of specialists, then this law does not allow and does not give the right to the state and the state institution to take away the accreditation and license. i named three points that solve this problem to relearn, there is no reason to take away the accreditation in violation of the rules, there is no reason, and the third is also no reason to take away the driver's license, because they commit 200-300 fines to take away and force

to relearn and pledge not to commit there is no violation of the mechanism, thank you, i can proceed to the vote. so, dear colleagues, i am putting to the vote the proposal to accept in the second reading and in general with the necessary technical and legal procedures the draft law with registration number 7354, the draft law on amendments to the code of ukraine on administrative offenses regarding the invitation to administrative responsibility in the field of training and admission of drivers to drive vehicles, please vote for 271 decisions adopted law adopted in

as a whole by factions please show thank you vyacheslav anatoliyovych thank you serhiy kostiantynovich we move on to the next draft law draft law with registration number 94-05 draft law on amending and recognizing as invalid some legislative acts of ukraine in connection with the end of the quarantine established with the aim prevention of the spread of the acute respiratory disease covid-19 caused by the tsarstkov 2 coronavirus on the territory of ukraine , this issue should be included in the agenda of the session , i suggest that this issue be included in the agenda of the day's session, i ask you to vote for 261, the decision was taken when it was included in the agenda of the session, i propose to consider this

issue according to the shortened procedure for 225, the decision was taken two for two against immediately, please write it down to the given against the faction of the group , please european solidarity rostislav pavlenko oleksiyev dear colleagues, of course, the faction european solidarity will support bill 94.05, this bill is important because it aims to adapt our legislation to the new realities

of vat, whose 19th central committee lasted for years and created a number of challenges to which we responded by introducing various temporary norms and restrictions , however, after the announcement to the world of the reorganization of health care on may 5, 2023 about the cancellation of the pandemic status of which 19 it became necessary to review or cancel these provisions, however, i would like to draw your attention to two points that in my opinion, additional discussion and refinement of the second reading are needed . first, the draft e-e draft law proposes to cancel the provision on the possibility of a person participating in a court session in the regime video conferences without an electronic digital signature, however, i believe that we should discuss the possibility of preserving some of these norms. after all, we are currently under martial law. the second bill of the hare proposes to exclude some parts of article 39 of the law on the establishment of state guarantees regarding insurance payments to medical workers of health care institutions. however, some of

the provisions that are proposed to be excluded are not related to the consequences of the covid -9 disease, for example, this applies to the provisions that regulate the issue of insurance payment to scientists in the family of parents and supported by a medical worker in the event of his death . that is already leaving the arena yes, and this is already the case in some cases of nakhaism, appropriate measures should already be taken at the legislative level, how much legislation really lags behind social relations in some cases, and we still have