[000:00:00;00] today they live on the territory of this formation , it is desirable to avoid any stay in the temporarily occupied territories of ukraine. crimea, well, actually, the majority does not go anyway. well, there is some effective percentage that is quite small. do not participate in any propaganda, informational and other actions. well , because it is simply dangerous for life and health, in addition, you run the risk of being involved in war crimes and, accordingly, have been punished for it, and aksenov knows this for sure because he is still going when he is usually a fool well, therefore, this is already a story for how much the russian administration values ​​the lives of its own civilians p andrii you

mentioned about logistics, how it will affect the logistics of the occupiers and how soon it will be reflected on the front of the russian-ukrainian war, well, just the story with one bridge, we will not quickly understand, but we will not see the results. but if we talk about the totality of events that are happening now on the front line and behind the front line, we see that , well, systematically, the logistics and means of communication of the occupiers, well, let's say they suffer systemic losses and this dynamic will continue, everything that slows down the delivery of the enemy's means of force to ukrainian territory, everything that complicates the logistics of the means that help the putin regime to kill ukrainians both civilians and military, well, of course, this is good news for us and this is news that we will definitely take advantage of. the ukrainian security and defense forces have great

chances. i'm completely tired. at the moment, i think that the first task is a task that many good people, not only in ukraine, are thinking about and solutions to which will definitely be found. well, after the attack on the crimean bridge , russia officially withdrew from the grain agreement that allowed the export of ukrainian food from of black sea ports , despite the war, moscow has already informed turkey of its decision by ukraine , the un secretariat, at least this is what the kremlin said, russia has withdrawn its shipping safety guarantees and intends to close the maritime humanitarian corridor in the north-western waters of the black sea, the president of turkey, the regime of pardogan, said that he plans to talk to vladimir putin because he believes that he is interested in the humanitarian corridor continuing to work. zoryana stepanenko will continue to terminate the agreement . and said that

the eu resolutely condemns it, assured that it is working to ensure food security for vulnerable segments of the world's population, and in this context mentioned the so-called lines of solidarity routes the export of ukrainian grain through the neighboring ukraine of the european union, however, he noted that they are not designed for such volumes of cargo, that is why the sea route was necessary. therefore , the main route for the departure of ukrainian grain outside ukraine, which is one of the largest exporters of agricultural products in the world, is blocked the last ship with agricultural raw materials on which the black sea initiative was spread , the odesa port chora left, and today moscow announced that the agreement was being terminated, which already informed ukraine, turkey, and the un that is, the other side of the agreement and the mediators say the whole thing is a failure to fulfill russian requirements, although the grain agreement did not include them, russia nominated them separately within the terms of the notification to ros silgosbank, which makes payments related to the export of grain, access to the swift payment system, which was lost

a year ago in connection in connection with the sanctions of the fine, shell time learned that the european union did not reject the possibility of concessions, a plan that would allow all participants of the agreement to relatively save face provided for the creation of a subsidiary of ros silgosbank in terms of legality and chances the implementation of this scheme was confirmed by the sources of the publication, studied by the governing bodies of the european union, russia also wanted to restore the supply of modern agricultural machinery, the access of russian ships to foreign ports and the restoration of ammonia transit through ukrainian territory , which stopped with the beginning of the invasion. the fact is that russia is simultaneously building a terminal for the export of ammonia near the black sea. - this is coming to an end and the ukrainian foreign ministry considered this a possible reason for russia's withdrawal from the grain initiative , such a turn was not a surprise for ukraine russia has repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the agreement in the ukrainian mini-infrastructure, they talked about the existence of a plan until it was presented. and i will also add that during the year of its existence, the agreement

allowed the withdrawal of about 33 million tons of grain from ukraine, preventing a shortage of food in the world and its arrival in ukraine of foreign exchange revenue, the president of her predecessor still believes that vladimir putin wants this humanitarian corridor to function and in the future announced a conversation with the president of russia without waiting for their august meeting zoryan stepanenko marik hajduk radio svoboda i will only add to the words of my colleague zoryana stepanenko that a message just appeared that un secretary general antonio otelish sent a letter to vladimir putin with a new proposal to preserve the grain agreement and he also said that the un will continue to promote the export of products and fertilizers from ukraine and russia well, i urge you at this moment to subscribe to the pages of radio svoboda and like this broadcast, the youtube algorithm works in the following way: the more likes

, the more people will find out about us support our work well , andriy ryzhenko, captain of the first rank of the reserve , deputy chief of staff of the navy of the armed forces of ukraine, 2004-20 years, joins our broadcast. the term could have been extended, but moscow did not extend it so demonstratively, is this a response to the explosion at the crossing or not a fact ? well, they said that they were terminating the grain agreement , or rather the part of the agreement that concerns them, they said that they were terminating and they said that it is not related to the fact of today's explosions on the crimean bridge, but there is an agreement signed by ukraine with

turkey and the united nations. let's say it very diplomatically, well, they said in the kremlin that after july 17, the russian federation does not guarantee the safety of the marijuana of these vessels, which means that they will follow from three ukrainian ports to the bosphorus, that is, well, translating this, we will say well a diplomatic statesman can say that well, there will simply be provocations at sea and ships may be targeted. well, attacks at sea may be covert attacks, that is, it may be a-a well, for example, an explosion of a sea mussel somewhere on the path of surveillance, but there or there, for example, an attack by some unknown

drone but on the way there is a follow-up by sea or air, and then it will be very difficult to find it. who does it belong to? well, there can be many, many options, but, well , it looks like this, that is, if there is i understood you correctly that if russia does not now agree to the extension of the grain agreement and does not sign this zone agreement with turkey before then, well, because without ukraine, russia did not sign anything, so if they restart now, they will not restart this grain agreement, then we can expect the shelling of ships that they will follow with food there of course it was maybe they forgot a little it was in february in march last year they even launched rockets to guide them with rubles

or rather shepherds who came into our country they are estonian vessels, they sunk in front of the entrance to the port of odesa, of such a nature, they will continue more faithfully, they will start again , i understood you well. by putin, if we return to the topic with which we started the broadcast - the attack on the crimean bridge. i understand that the railway line was not affected, only the car lane was affected. from your point of view , what is the short-term or short-term effect today's attack on the crimean bridge may have a long-term perspective, how will it affect the logistics and supply of all the necessary military infrastructure there

for the russian troops in southern ukraine, well , 25% of the cargo that goes to crimea and then from crimea goes to southern ukraine well, i have to the attention of the military, they are supplied through the crimean bridge , eh, so most of it was supplied through that damaged, and i think that it will take at least a few weeks to repair it, and maybe even a few months, then the road will be blocked through the crimean bridge, that is, everything that is being transported to the crimea is transported by road transport, it will take a longer route to the crimea through the corridor and

the path there is also limited because the bridge over chongar was also damaged a few weeks ago and there too. now there is no traffic, but the presence of this railway branch generally allows the enemy to see such and such trains to deliver the railway to the crimea and unload and then transfer this equipment to the occupied south of our country and use it on the defensive lines against our troops, so i can somehow make an assumption there that this is a logistical artery, it will be uh, well, attacks in they will continue it because, well, although the russians are now trying to use these alternative means of delivery, for example , they use amphibious ships now, where

are the transportation of trucks through the kerch strait, but anyway, there are some they are now able to transfer part of the cargo across the crimean bridge, although again, ah, this road connection is currently stopped there, actually, on the road connection , i will say for our audience, for understanding, that they are transmitting. ria novosti reports that multi-kilometer traffic jams have formed on the highway connecting the occupied crimea and the kherson region. and it is reported that the traffic jams on the section to crimea from melitopol are now reaching from 4 to 6 km and traffic jams also formed on the kerch ferry crossing in the direction of crimea to the krasnodar region. this is the news as of now. you said that from your point of view the attacks will continue, and today was

the statement of the deputy prime minister mykhailo fedorov . he said that the crimean bridge was destroyed attacked naval drones and promised to increase their actual production. and what kind of weapon is this, and where else is it? ukraine previously used the media to write that it was possible to attack sevastopol bay with these same drones, and how much, from your point of view, ukraine has the potential to continue to use such weapons. do you have any idea if there are many? well, i can’t say anything by force, i think that this information is closed and it should be closed . but i think that uh, we have several types of these types let's say attack drones, these are kamikaze drones that can make an impression of targets as ships. yes, it is possible and

different structures located on the sea , such as, for example, this bridge and the crimean bridge. well, that's what we see now, it's approaching the frigate admiral makarov is on the board of this drone was about 60 kg of explosives, and this allows you to damage a ship of such a class as a frigate, but it is difficult to destroy it, what we saw this morning, rather at night, well, let's say from the nature of the explosions, we can say that there were several hundred on board kilograms of explosives and well, it means the force of the high-explosive explosion caused the consequences that we saw. with this and the road surface, let him go from our

southern coast to the crimean bridge . that the energy capacity of this drone allows it. as for the drones themselves, they have the maximum use of technologies that are used in the civilian civilian industry, that is, there are engines and navigation and communication and sensors. the only thing that is there is the military. as i understand it, it is precisely the combat unit of explosives. and thanks to this, their production is sufficient. well, quite quickly. i think that, in general, the number of uh in our armed forces is increasing, the more there were initiatives that uh

supported this project, let's say and materially and financially, i think that uh, there is support there, and well, modern technologies as well, but if we look more closely at today 's detonation, from your point of view, what was the goal of this strike, if we completely destroy this supply chain, then hmm, the goal was not achieved because in mainly, as far as i understand, russia supplies all the necessary equipment, machinery and military there, the railway was not destroyed, but maybe the goal was not achieved, or maybe such a goal was not there from the very beginning, but simply the goal was to inflict some certain moral and psychological

what can you say? well, the moral and psychological school, i think that this is not the main task, but to frighten. maybe they should run away. indeed, i understand that today is a holiday in part. the point is that the opponent is also a countermeasure. you understand that this bridge is quite well guarded. there is a serious security unit there if you look closely at the footage that was shot at night with explosions. you will see a lot of such, well, small shots, these are shots from small arms of large caliber, machine guns, maybe also anti-aircraft guns, they counteracted these drones when they approached, maybe and the final part of their trajectory, maybe this caused

the fact that, well, the explosion just came under well, under the road surface, and not under this one, here is the railway, oh well, i can simply predict that in accordance with the operational needs, well, the conduct of a counteroffensive operation a-ah well , some kind of influence on this object will be continued what regarding this main artery of the railway supply of military equipment to the territory of crimea, the occupation authorities are urging the civilian population of cars , as i understand it, to use the so-called alternative routes to drive through berdyansk , melitopol-mariupol, if the ukrainian military really manages to completely destroy this crimean bridge and cut off the roads delivery of a-a and from your point of view

to what extent these so-called alternative ways alternative routes can replace themselves the crimean bridge we remember, for example, in the 14th year, when the russians occupied the crimea, they only had one such route, and it was semi-legal, as they brought it to their troops at the initial stage of the occupation of the crimea. ships, paratroopers, ships, and they loaded them with equipment by the personnel of novorossiysk and then transported them to sevastopol, where they unloaded them, that is, if we succeed, for example, this corridor means

freeing it from russian occupation, and let's say to neutralize the crimean bridge and the road-railway connection, then in fact only the sea route remains. well, it is possible by air, and also because now we know that a small part of the cargo and personnel are delivered to the airports of the crimea also by airplanes. which is delivered in this way, it is not high. i think that it is possible somewhere no more than 5%, and maybe even less , that is, this is the capacity of their logistics, it will be very, very unsatisfactory , we heard you, thank you very much andrii ryzhenko captain of the first rank of the reserve, deputy chief of staff of the navy of the armed forces of ukraine, in the years 2004-2020, we talked about the consequences

of the attack on the crimean bridge, thank you very much . well, let's open another topic about which a lot of people have been talking about in recent days and even weeks, including everything in social networks on what is appropriate and inappropriate to spend state money on during the war, despite the fact that state money does not exist, there is money from ukrainian taxpayers, that is, our money with you, which we pay to the state in the form of taxes. well, the state then distributes it to purpose and according to needs, the question is how justified are these or other needs during the war? well, for example, in volyn , a scandal recently broke out around the stadium, for the repair of which the authorities of the kivertsi district center spent , decided to spend 145 million uah, this is a new artificial field, running tracks, sports grounds, lighting, community opinions are divided some support it, others say it is not the right time because there is a war in the country, the mayor convinced that he is doing this , including for the soldiers who will return from the front, but the arguments did not work even after

publicity tender canceled another example state tv channel dom plans to spend uah 14 million on filming new year's comedies about this , in particular, our money reports with reference to data in the prozorro system, we are currently talking about two new year's comedy series with working titles in the sanatorium nezabudka and the call sign santa, as appropriate my expenses , the question is also open to open. the drones of which the ukrainian army badly needs. well, on july 13, the verkhovna rada allocated more than uah 570 million for the completion of the national museum of the holodomor genocide. 312 deputies pressed for the news. it also caused a lively discussion in ukrainian society. museums are allegedly really needed. but is it appropriate to spend such money now? when the needs of the front are not closed well, for example, as

oleg simoros , a veteran of the armed forces of ukraine, comments on it. of course, i understand everything. i'm sorry. we already have the ato, don't we have half a billion to spend in a warring country , can the armed forces be fully equipped with drones, cars , means of communication and anti-drone guns , what the hell is going on, there are one and a half thousand kilometers of the active front, heavy battles are taking place, and they are throwing away insane amounts of money for museums. there are simply no words, these funds could have saved more than one life, and if the guys do not stand up, then you will have nowhere to build a museum, what is appropriate , it is categorically inappropriate to spend money of ukrainian taxpayers during the war let's talk further, nikita joins

the air , indulges people's deputy, servant of the people, chairman of the committee on humanitarian information policy good evening good evening let's start with the museum of the holodomor. the verkhovna rada has allocated more than uah 500 million for the completion of this complex. what has been finished must be completed right now. whose idea was it and what were the arguments for it? i will start a little differently. i am surprised that in the second year of a full-scale war, people and journalists obviously do not understand that this money in general, it is not ours and our taxpayers, because all our money that we collect, with the exception of local budgets, goes entirely to the front, it is money from international macro-financial assistance, other money we have for all our uh, so to speak, civilian expenses are simply absent and about this should be known and reminded to viewers, listeners, and so on , that is, american european taxpayers are definitely financial aid that comes to us, it is signed, it

is reconciled, which means that our donors know very well what ukraine spends every penny on. by the way, not a single penny of this money can be used for the needs of the front. i think that our media people should remind the ukrainian audience about this. not a single drone or any other military purchase can be made with this money, and this has been known for a long time, uh, our money who once again emphasized that we collect e-e in ukraine everything we collect and where to the front everything that goes from international donors goes to civilian needs and civilian expenses e-e means this money that should be directed to the completion of the first phase of the first phase they are a museum of the holodomor they were also taken from international macro-financial assistance, and it was definitely agreed with our partners, they were used. the money that is simply in other directions

will not have time. well, no, no, they will not have time to work or be spent there by the end of the year. that’s how they found this money. it was very difficult to find it, by the way. uh, it was not an easy task , why was it, who is doing it, because this year, i will remind you of the 90th anniversary, we constantly ask all the parliaments of all democratic countries to recognize the famine, are there already 33 countries that have done it, we did not we have no moral right. if we have the money that we found, we did not contribute to this terrible tragedy until the 90s. did i understand correctly that ukraine received where did this money come from ? they insisted that it should only be for the museum. i just said

, did i misunderstand you? you misunderstand me . you will misunderstand me. certain things to do are not military expenses. i emphasize again, that's why we looked, well, the ministry of finance, of course, looked at where we have some here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, in order to find the necessary amount, we determined what we can do, so much, in fact, there is a larger amount there, like the lithuanian debt and just the builders who have been building this object for many years. they agreed to wait for the payment, and there is actually more money, well, it 's not so important, it's important that we notified the ministry of finance. thank you, they notified this money from various programs was agreed with international partners and in this way. so we have an amount that we can spend on the holodomor museum. they said again

that the year of the 90s was the anniversary of this tragedy, which we ask and demand that all countries of the world recognize it as genocide as we can afford not to do anything in the year of the 90s. well, first of all, i want to say that in ukraine, i still want to send money to the front for the war, but thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of ukrainians have lost their homes, and many of them are still without roof over head and obviously these remarks from representatives of ukrainian society and from ordinary people in social networks, they are also about the fact that some basic needs of people are not covered due to the war and the government spends such a lot of money on the museum . i.e. not the government, but the entire body of ukrainian law in poland, the representative of the legislative branch of government decided for a minute the ukrainian

legislative highest body in the constitutional composition of 314 votes you said it yourself that is this is a decision of the national legislative body and not the government, as you say, what does it mean to restore damaged housing, there is no doubt that there is money for it, but you do not ask yourself the question why are we possibly late somewhere, and because we now have half a shift in construction crews that everyone is at the front, how many builders do we have now, how much capacity do we have now, a few builders, but i know that there are many , many families without housing, and i think that it is worth and i think that it should be counted and what do we have now the capabilities of our e-e construction plants to produce building materials and what are the possibilities now to put people to work how many people are there now no wait we are talking about e p victors now i understand look

there is there is there is there is look there is one cup a glass can be filled with water exactly as much as it fits in there means our small cup . i remain very small right now, so when someone says that it was possible to buy there, well, i am already silent about drones, because drones cannot be bought. and if someone says that it was possible to spend there somewhere you can spend even more. and how much can you, well, master, since you can do it, that is, today i also spoke with your colleague from the faction, the voice of yaroslav yurchyshyn, he has a different opinion. he believes that the parliament made a mistake with this decision, despite the fact that he himself also voted for this decision, but he says that against the background of the war, it was a mistake . let me ask you one more question, which is also relevant to your committee and your activities. well, 14 million for entertainment tv series for the new year, this is also the tv channel dom, this is also such is the necessity, and it was only possible to spend money there, too. and this is for the money