[000:00:00;00] the west we can't destroy the whole city we can't do the second vietnam gerasim nagasaki we can't otherwise we'll stop shaking and it won't allow us no matter how much we don't want to do it to me, too, maybe tomorrow i want to do it and say, turn off all the bridges and all the railway stations in kiev между николаевом одессой we will return to the port e-e buildings of odesa misha, but the second such topic is to suddenly cut off ukraine from the sea immediately, the only thing that comes to mind of the ukrainian regime is not there should be access to the black sea odessa, nikolaev should be russian cities and kherson, you understand that it is already part of our constitution, of course , at least we need to go to transnistria

until we take control of the coastal strip from tachakov to e-e ismaila ukraine under our control, all this will continue. they just need to cut off the sea so that they don't have any sea . such a russian ideologue got out and began to tell that there is no need to defend the bridge at all, let them continue to bomb and there is no need to defend anything russian at all, it is necessary to capture even more with senator zhabarov that strategic answers especially after russia's exit from the grain deal would be first of all the establishment of control over the exit of this terrorist nazi state to the sea zone. and then

the presence there of british military villages and american e-e instructors or warships would simply be lost it is better to concentrate and throw away all the forces not on the protection of the bridge or our water areas, but on what is necessary now, eh, an attack on eh, is it necessary to stop control over the former ukrainian border with the black sea, that’s how we really are and we will punish the british and the americans. well, you know this is the punishment of the british and the americans in my head, and it is very long behind me to be safe on my sofa, and you have one thing, but it also interferes a lot when i

hear what is needed, where does it stand do not agree it is necessary to completely cut off ukraine from the black sea, liberate the russian old cities of nikolaev of odessy, of course, let me remember , after all , marinka is 6 km long, we have been liberating it since last spring. as it was said here we ca n't even imagine approximately есть такая можность сейчас there is no maryinka - it is near donetsk, so that it would be clear to you geographically where it is, well, let's add to these beautiful words, i can't do anything, so i won't, what's called a good idea, ah, well, but that's what you know as a constant refrain, and here we return to the attack on the infrastructure, er, portorium goes that this attack is probably somehow related to what you will wrap

- the action of the grain corridor has ended, and here they are trying to force russia to do something or not to force it, or something else has happened. and this topic worries russians in general, especially their propagandists, because , first of all, the grain agreement for russia is a very irritating topic for the domestic audience because the cream can't explain to a deep russian why they need a grain agreement and why they don't comply with it, well, something is shorter there , anyway , they somehow export the grain. will go to the fact that we are demanding a new way of this whole grain agreement and somehow we will implement something like that and that's all this is in principle uh very much hangs over this one more question and if the grain agreement will work without russia because actually

well, zelensky turned to turkey with the fact that, well, let's give convoys , and this is what ukraine was talking about a year ago , let's give convoys and we will export our grain under convoy, we just so that the russians cannot attack it, and probably then russia is not needed in these grain agreements and russian propagandists - this puts a little bit in such a dead end . and what will happen if there are really convoys for this answer? not very well, exits for the children's port are looming, we will not mine the stomach of dry thunderstorms. they will start us, as they say, it is taken back that we will do it, we will attack the turkish ships, we can do it, and tomorrow ukraine will send the sports

of odessa or nikolaev. the sea will simply sink them together with the crew , or we must, uh, announce an ultimatum to say that you are loaded , it is permissible for a rescue marriage, we give you 30 minutes to sail from the ships, after that we sink them, or we sink them there, i don’t know any other way by torpedo attacks of submarines or we simply miss these ships, why sinking ships is not an option , but there is also quite such a thing. well, a transparent and clear explanation really looks at me. accept your decision, you know, we don't know to the end. what opportunities do we have today? i understand that turkey

is still very important for us. nato ships can enter the black sea, and it would not be the best option for us to provoke nato to close our warships . the same dugin and all the others are inventing how to somehow do something like that so as not to go to war with turkey. this is also a very interesting idea. let 's listen to it, because you know, this is a usual example of russian such a method. everyone is fooled when they think that no one is understands what is happening, there is a lot to be saved, and the promotion of unsanctioned russia or ignoring russia’s interests of grain shipments on the black sea

without getting into a direct conflict with turkey, and i think that all the ships that will enter the ukrainian lake were turkish , accompanied by the turkish military traitors, english, or there are french at all on the street. what kind of sergeants are they, or are they really poor africans? our friends can fix them, but there are a lot of them. ships that can be installed. yes, yes. which in if they think so that it is possible without us and swim in our internal sea once at all we did not approach it , we did not approach it we can deliver such a sensitive blow to the insurers and the position that the solution is that the russian federation is far from the black sea again, well, this is a solution that is clear to all normal people, which in principle is quite real, but if we talk about what they

dream, they dream what they will be able to somehow increase the cost of insurance there with such attacks on ships, no one will sail, no one will export grain from ukraine. in this way, they will disrupt the grain corridor , but since you know this is a very dangerous option, suddenly turkey will not like it, whatever not their ships, but someone else's. someone is trying to attack. well, that's why it's scary, and this gives rise to another idea, let 's attack the ukrainian port infrastructure, and this is, in principle, a very big topic, which is heard for the second day, and i tell you i will tell you, in fact, it has not been the second day, but it sounds like she will stop sudokus in this area , too .

we can destroy the infrastructure of portugal in order to simply cut off this shipping and it is necessary to totally destroy the port infrastructure of all three coastal cities, any dry cargo that received a total blow will sink, for example, in the water area or close to the mooring walls of technological ports built in odessa and nikolaev. vot pozhajsya dyvnikie will be paralyzed, so uh-uh frankly uh-uh, it is precisely the blows of the flail against the ukrainian port infrastructure that are connected to the destruction of the ports with the fact that it would be desirable to stop the export of grain from of ukraine, that is, in essence

, to destroy this grain agreement, and they talk about it quite frankly, too. which we may encounter difficult partners intransigence possible blackmail a-a there periotsenko forces negotiating position and maybe it does n't prove that well, you understand, there are no grain terminals, there is no grain transaction, even theoretically there is grain there, sunflower meal , everything will burn there, you can’t imagine how it is, there is no infrastructure and there is no grain transaction. чего это принциально детресние well, let's say there's some ilyichevsky grain terminal that's fundamentally

different from the fifth one. then , in my opinion, there's nothing different from the city of kyiv. and you know, it 's actually like that, it's absolutely no different, strikes on ports are no different from strikes on power plants is all civilian infrastructure is all war with the civilian population prevent the export of grain suffocate with hunger suffocate because there are no funds in the country suffocate the civilian population is essentially a war with the civilian population and what they they didn't say that there were some military forces there. there are no military targets there, they are strikes on the civilian population, but the main thing here is not even that. and the fact that now they are trying to position it as if it is some kind of response to the crimean bridge, all this is a complete delusion this is not true, because in reality this story arose earlier and

they started talking about it earlier, the russians are preparing for the breakdown of the grain agreement, for the breakdown of ukrainian grain exports, i have already shown you this plot for a long time, i will show it again solovyov's story came out a week ago, and even then it was about disrupting the grain agreement with attacks on the port infrastructure. there were no problems on the crimean bridge yet, and they were already talking about it . look again, you can first completely destroy the infrastructure of the odessa port, here is the port as a variant of the answer well, it's very simple , it means it's necessary to fully ask today, we will participate, but because we won't say it, they will say yes and it's not necessary, now we 'll take our ships to see everything off, which

well, let's still have an odessa port, it's possible, just here, yes, a port came here in general , well, yes, there is an ilyichevsky port, 6 ports came out in odessa, i 'm all over you , what's up? immediately grain deals disappear, if you love it, it’s perspective. opera theater. why not? someone will tell us that as a result , we tried to attack some crimean bridge, and they did something in return. it’s all a delusional plan to destroy ukrainian ports.

for a long time it was just an attempt to disrupt our grain export and once again threaten the world with hunger after the new harvest . it's not in any way, but it's not related to the plans that russia is making when it destroys our ports. that's all. remember this and what you mean. and we'll see each other. oh, oh, i sprained my back. is this a guy? flamidez gel quickly reduces inflammation and treats pain from pain in back and joints flamidez there are discounts on proctosis not like that in pharmacies podorozhnyk to you and oshchad so that ukrainians don't think about anything, no matter what they talk about, the first place still comes out

war, war and our victory only on espresso from monday to monday completely different spheres of human activity sports health, politics , the return of crimea, military analytics , nine presenters, journalists , experts, opinion leaders in real time about the most current events through the prism of war in author's projects on espresso hello, this is freedom, morning informational project

radio svoboda guests every day this is the shipping district of kherson live inclusion we are in bahmut tell the main thing on weekdays at 9:00 deoccupation and how can you live without stopping you can be unsurpassed the history of the liberated cities of ukraine went let's see how our brothers helped us freed from normal life freed from normal technology of pro-russian inhumans , it was scary, it was very scary every day . one by one, two houses were burned, and ukrainian people , nazis, are here. yes, we are all nationalists here, people who resisted, residents came out here stopped and sent back and became heroes the novel would have become ukraine from the uk raine project in the cycle of deoccupation that on saturdays at 11:10 on espresso in june 2023 the espresso tv channel continues to lead the top of ukrainian informational tv channels

greetings dear tv viewers, time to learn about the most important for according to the measurement data, viewers choose the ukrainian view from espresso, congratulations friends mykola veresen vitalik autobot health to all thank you ukrainians for trusting espresso works for you see this week in the program collaborators of traitors in epaulettes, how the russian peace is being implemented in the occupied territories, how the ex-assistant to the minister of defense became a luhansk militant, ukrainian ideas of such a thing, this idea of ​​degradation, see on wednesday , july 19 at 5:45 p.m. vasyl winter's broadcast my name is vasyl winter, two hours of air time, two hours of your time, we will talk about the most important things, two hours to

learn about the war, join our broadcast serhiy zgoretska military summaries of the day and what is the world like? yuriy fizer will talk for two hours to stay up to date with economic news. oleksandr morshchynka told us about the economy during the war and new sports. yevhen pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters. about culture during the war , the war is ready to talk, or even the presenters, which many have become like, maybe the weather will give us some optimism, mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, as well as distinguished guests we will have a studio today volodymyr ogrysko if everything goes well the events of the day in two hours vasyl winter's big broadcast project for smart and caring people in the evening nayspresso rather refers to the traditional such

approach to foreign policy from republicans to trump which consists in the fact that pavlik of america and the role of america will be very large, and russia is a threat, and ukraine is a natural partner for america. and in your opinion , what are the risks? of hard-liners even before the previous elections, so that they were held in november of last year, the last vote was and there were 57 votes against 70 now, that is, we see little progress. thank god, therefore, we can say that the vast majority of republicans, even including, by the way, who is maneuvering a little with different factions there, but they are all still, they are inclined to the fact that ukraine should continue

to be supported, and that is why it is most likely to be so large later in the fall, when the presidential administration will probably turn to congress again for a new package of money to help ukraine and the old money is not over yet. how do we know that today is not tomorrow? i see this is what you talked about with the previous one, and your guests will be announced about a new billion of 300 million dollars of support in ukraine to end the war in a day if he is re-elected president of the united states , he said this in fox news interview i suggest you listen now and let's continue the discussion. i know zelensky very well and i know putin very well, even better and i had a good relationship, very good with both of them . i would say enough to zelensky. you should

make a deal i would say to putin if you don't make a deal we will give them a lot we will give them more than they have ever received if i have to i will make a deal in one day in one day mr. volodymyr ot what do you think of this statement by trump he is populism before the elections does he really believe what he says about the deal in one day? well, you know, it is always difficult to understand with a fine where populism is. and what exactly is he? believe it or not, the fact that he considers himself a stable genius, he already said that is a complete delusion. well, let's say that he has a good relationships zelenskyi can be recalled that in 2019 he put pressure on zelenskyi and therefore, in principle, complicated our bilateral relations for a long time, because the trauma of mistrust of america and washington is still being preserved in kyiv in the team of our current president, and as for

trump, this led as we remember we are pushing for impeachment. it is because of the pressure on the ukrainian government. then there is nothing about putin. putin will not listen to him, because then he will not respect him, the more he says: we will give ukraine as much as we have never given anyone, and now this is what is happening. america gives a lot. everything that i can give ukraine now, and even you don’t have enough shells for your own armed forces. what else can i give trump? that’s why it’s just such a populist phrase, but unfortunately , you see, people listen to him and it works for his popularity. to close this block , so to speak, considering such statements, how trump will use them to attract the votes of those voters who are conditionally tired of the war well, there are many of them in america that they

they say that in general, america should play a smaller role in the world, and not get involved in various conflicts, not conflicts, and not rely or count on any alliances and blocs that exist, but act independently. and that there are many problems inside the country, that there are more threats from the southern border where mexicans and central americans go to america and this is more of a problem for america for a day and therefore supporting ukraine and restraining russia distracts from china although there is a connection between by the way between china and russia there was restraining russia in principle the americans are undermining that the number and strength of china, therefore, there are many such considerations due to which part of the americans adhere to the phrase to the ideology of trump's rhetoric, the question of which countries of the west are on the rear-counteroffensive, the washington

post writes about this with reference to american officials. ura- an excerpt from the article and discuss its pace of progress in three main directions along the huge front line are causing concern in the west, there are fears that the government of president volodymyr zelenskyi may not inflict as powerful a blow as possible, an american official said on condition of anonymity that the united states and other countries have trained ukrainian troops in complex offensive maneuvers and provided equipment for demining, including rollers and reactive charges, the use of all these capabilities in such a way that it is possible to break through these obstacles, but to do it quickly is of primary importance - said the official, mr. volodymyr, we will not interfere now , of course

. but from the point of view of international politics, from the point of view of us aid , is there really a risk that they will say what this article is about, and aid may become less, as you think. this may happen. unfortunately , there is such a threat, or rather, everything from the side of the politicians, not the american military, in the american military, they will continue to help ukraine, but if the politicians say that you see it is not working, the ukrainians cannot liberate their territory, so what is the point in providing tens of billions of dollars and even more weapons in the future, but we must perhaps it is better to put pressure on kyiv that kyiv negotiated with russia and gave some territories, and you cannot offer such a mood. and what is so counter-offensive , they say that in such a difficult situation in which the ukrainian armed forces found themselves, one cannot expect

very i will quickly break through and attack due to the fact that the russian troops are now defending themselves quite well , no one has done this before, and we do not have many types. have arrived in ukraine so far, that is, all normal people, experts in military analytics, but not military people, they understand that the ukrainian army is facing a very serious problem and it will take time. maybe how can it be used by people like trump and his supporters? well, they will say that the war is going on and that ukraine won't win , the more it is destabilized, as

we saw there, a symbol of a beautiful woman also a scaremongering for the west that unstable russia will collapse, what will happen to its nuclear weapons, etc., that's why i will all be in the complex , all these uh-uh theses and they will be used in order to uh well, why should we continue to support the ukrainians, you see, they have probably already released everything that were able to release, so why throw money and weapons to the wind when it is clear that we have to negotiate with that russia, we will not be able to defeat russia on the battlefield, i am sure that we will be able to, mr. volodymyr, thank you very much for this analysis of the sentiments, which in particular ruled by the united states states of america regarding aid to ukraine volodymyr red dubovik, director of the center for international studies, and we talked about aid to ukraine and the prospects of this aid for the future, a short pause and we

return to the discussion of the ukrainian, there is a new bodyguard, the one who protects the country at the front , the one who does not have the right to make a mistake, people from the enemy, their lives defending ukraine , the story of vigilant heroes will live forever, because it is these heroes who create the future, the future of europe, the future of the whole world, the heroes of ukraine

write the history of humanity for thousands of years ahead thank you. well, heat awaits ukraine this week, according to the ukrainian meteorological center, the maximum temperature will be in the south-eastern regions , thermometers can rise to 34 degrees in the carpathians, the temperature will reach 31° in the north, it will be slightly cooler, the temperature will remain at a maximum level of about 27°. next, we will not talk about how you and i can withstand the heat. we will talk about how the ukrainian energy system will or will not withstand the heat, how it will affect the consumption of electricity in ukraine. by oleksandr kharchenko, director of the energy research center, and oleksandr good