[000:00:00;00] was a guest of svoboda ranku svoboda ranok with you every weekday from 9:00 onwards on this broadcast we will continue to talk about such things the other day there were explosions heard in the feodosiya district but this morning i bought about the fire at the landfill in the kirovsk district in the east of the tauriy peninsula it was built during the occupation , it was closed, people are being evacuated, what is happening in the occupied crimea, and what military facilities were under attack, this time we will discuss in detail, a big mistake was made, yes, on the exit of russia from the black sea french president emmanuel macron reacted to the grain initiative, and nato secretary general genstoltenberg condemned russia's decision, what will be the political consequences for russia and whether it is possible to save the ukrainian grain market, we will discuss this topic soon , in the meantime, i thank you for your activity in the chat for your comments questions to the speakers

of this broadcast. do not forget to subscribe to the radio freedom channel, put your preferences , it is very important for this video to be seen by as many people as possible. made a final decision in the case of russia against ukraine and rejected all moscow's claims to kyiv, this case has been discussed since the 21st year, then the russian government appealed to the european court of justice with an international complaint against ukraine , and there were even 10 groups of accusations, in particular then russia accused ukraine of shelling alleged russian territories , discrimination against the russian-speaking population , the disaster of the international flight ml-17 and the death of civilians in 2014 , although since moscow ceased membership in the council of europe since last year, it has not participated in the process, ignored even requests from the court, in particular, in may it did not provide translations of documents, the press service

of the european court of human rights notes about this, and in november, russia did not respond to a letter asking whether the russian government is interested in his application being considered in the future by this themis, so the court decided that russia is no longer interested in being considered separately in the yesl emphasized that the complaint of the russian government was unfounded, what kind of complaint was it and in general, what is the situation with lawsuits in russia against ukraine and vice versa , uh, in the european court of human rights, we will talk further. explain about this if it is possible , but in general there are so many cases of russia , uh, there were calls from russia against ukraine

, what were the accusations based on? moscow tried to blame kyiv, i will remind you that this is an important point, that this is about the period before the full-scale invasion , so the case seems to be quite difficult, but to summarize briefly what this case came down to, it was the so-called mirror lawsuit of the russian federation eh, which eh, in which there were complaints about human rights violations during the armed aggression of the russian federation since the 14th year, but here ukraine was blamed by russia, that is, they accused that the armed forces of ukraine were shelling the eastern regions in ukraine, what is happening, the oppression of the russian-speaking population also transferred to us the responsibility for the plane crash, flight mh17, indicating their version, which they followed, and not only in the european court of human rights in

all state lawsuits of ukraine against the russian federation, but also in other international platforms and during the investigation of the joint investigative group of the e-e regarding the i e-e flight emei 17 that certain ukraine because it did not close the airspace over the e-e eastern regions of ukraine then in the 14th year there were also a number of lawsuits, complaints, more precisely, which concerned not only the eastern regions of ukraine, there were complaints about a-a oppression of the objectionable, as he called it between journalists, regarding the non-delivery of water to crimea and the blocking of russian-speaking channels channels and the european european court of human rights, he then registered this lawsuit , and it was not such a victory for russia that er claimed that this complaint is admissible, it is just procedures, there was no decision in accordance with

the regulations of the european court between state lawsuits, when they are received, they are registered immediately and notified, the state that declared the defendant is notified of this case and the review of the admissibility of the case begins. that is, it is the registration of the case by the european court. acceptance does not automatically mean that the lawsuit is justified and that there is a question that this is the evidentiary basis of the russian lawsuit itself, this question arose almost immediately from the moment of filing this lawsuit against russia, because then in july of the 21st year, in addition to the lawsuit against ukraine, russia also filed so-called petitions for security measures a-a to understand this petition, when there is a real risk of violation of human rights, a party or an individual or a legal entity or a state can apply to the european court with a request to provide temporary instructions to another state to ensure compliance with human rights, and that is russia together with its inter the state pozol

also stated such a request for a protective measure, in particular, regarding the cessation by ukraine of the practice of oppressing the russian-speaking russian language , as well as regarding the cessation of the so-called water of the water blockade of crimea and the european court of human rights immediately rejected this petition, stating that no evidence was provided of the existence of a real risk of violation of fundamental human rights and laws. a month after the rejection of this petition, the russian federation again appealed to a similar petition without supplementing he did not provide any evidence, and the european court again rejected the cycle of the question, but i would like to point out that here it is necessary to understand that the purpose of this lawsuit, as we can already see with the decision now of the european court of human rights and what we saw immediately when we received this lawsuit for work eh from

the very beginning it was clear that this lawsuit was not about the protection of human rights eh it was more eh for well first of all of the information company within the russian federation, on the other hand, he had the goal of delaying in a certain way another process that was in the european court of human rights, and here i am talking about the ukrainian lawsuit ukraine and the netherlands against the russian federation in the 21st year. active was active preparation for of oral hearings on the admissibility of this case e this was an important stage e-e firstly we introduced this case already in the 14th year and e there were a number of rounds with the exchange of positions between ukraine e the russian federation and the netherlands when the lawsuit in

the netherlands was joined and e already we have just reached the stage of preparation for oral hearings on the admissibility of this case. this was an important stage because admissibility means not only consideration of the question of which complaints ukraine has declared and which the european court recognizes as such, which it will consider already on the merits, but also a very important issue of jurisdiction was considered if, in simple words, at that stage, the european court had to investigate and indicate whether the violations declared by ukraine fall under the responsibility of the russian federation, and if so, from what period, in what scope, and here this issue was very closely related to the issue of from what moment it is considered that russia seized the territories of eastern ukraine and , accordingly, exercised effective control over the respective ee captured territories and when russia filed this lawsuit in july

on the 21st of the year, it was three months before the oral hearings in the case of ukraine and the netherlands against the russian federation, together with this , with her lawyer, she filed a motion that the russian lawsuit be combined with the ukraine and the netherlands against russia, and legally and procedurally this meant if the european court satisfied it, it meant a delay in time, and uh, in such a long time, the consideration of the admissibility case, according to which the decision on admissibility is received, and the european court of human rights rejected this request, and he rejected several times, there were several motions and russia stated both within its russian lawsuit a cycle of issues and within the e-e lawsuit of ukraine and the dutch margarita in essence . it turns out that russia needs these lawsuits for information.

on television and oppressing russians, and here are all theses and beyond the limits of 17 by delaying the process. that is, this is an important matter, but we know that , in principle, he carefully followed it here. surely, there are arguments in this the situation in russia was not enough, we know about the decision and the results of this decision, which are accepted by everyone in the world, but who is really to blame for this a-a catastrophe, i thank you for joining in, explaining, and if possible, briefly tell me if there are more similar ones are there any cases in the european court of human rights in russia against ukraine or are there any more? this is the only lawsuit in russia against ukraine. there are interstate services related to armed aggression by the russian federation. these are ukrainian lawsuits. these are our explanations of donetsk russia from the side of russia in the direction of ukraine. this was the only one that was made unclear, and the reaction is that of the european court of human rights, which said that it was not justified, but a position. thank you , margarita na sukurenko.

the case of russia against ukraine at the european court of human rights, which is still ongoing for 21 of the 21st year. thank you for the conversation, later in this film we will talk about the situation in crimea . the evacuation of people is happening there, we must talk about it, write your questions in the comments under this broadcast . well, now let's talk about the help of western partners in ukraine. the officials were informed that this time arms will be provided in the amount of about 1.3 billion dollars, when exactly they will announce the provision of this assistance is not specified, but it seems that it may happen in the coming days, probably before this package military aid will include air defense equipment, anti-drone systems, explosive drones and ammunition , in particular, we are talking about anti-drone systems

vampye for combating drones and phoenix gost and sweet blade drones. and it is interesting that all this is transferred by the united states as part of the program that allows the administration of the president of the united states to buy weapons in industry , and not to transfer it from the warehouses of the american army, more ammunition of armored vehicles from a more protected sky, here is a new meeting of the format that the weapons of ukraine have ended precisely such an announcement about new packages of military aid that should satisfy both the urgent needs of ukraine at the front and long-term ones. what happened at the rammstein 14 meeting and what conclusions will be told by the correspondent of radio svoboda zoryana stepanenko, we are now live with us on the link zoryan vitay, tell me all the details what is the main thing, what theses, what help will ukraine receive , what was agreed upon and the second name of rammstein

, the format and focus of the last such meeting were and what ammunition the ukrainian military urgently needs now on the front how to produce more projectiles, plans for increasing the capacities of both national and multinational defense industries were discussed by the participants of the rammstein format and that he has confirmed his intentions to continue to support ukraine and now and in the future the ukrainian counteroffensive marks a key moment in this tragic war, the armed forces of ukraine took the initiative in restoring control over the sovereign territory of ukraine ukraine is fighting for its existence the stakes are very high but this contact group has never hid resignations are very high but this contact group has never hid from the challenges of quick results from the ukrainian counteroffensive, which has been going on for the sixth week, the american military leadership is not happy to wait, they do not associate the duration with failure and predict that many battles are still ahead, they

will be long, difficult, and bloody, 17 brigades that number more than 63,000 fighters the international coalition has prepared for this complex operation, said the top general-marquis , who actually made such predictions and , according to him, a significant reserve is still waiting to enter the combat arena, while part of the forces penetrates the russian defense, russian mini-fields that were intended to stop the ukrainian army in the pentagon consider the main problem an obstacle on their way , they called it correct that the movement through them ukrainian forces are slowing down in order to survive, this offensive will be slow, complex and will have a high price. i will not say what will happen in in the future because ukraine will decide where and when to direct their reserves now they are maintaining their fighting capacity and slowly and steadily making their way through all these

minefields and it's a tough fight it's a very tough fight packages intended to help ukraine in it. what was announced by its partners at the next rammstein on the eve of the batch of m113 armored personnel carriers, which, among other things, safely transport infantry, that is, soldiers, ukraine will receive them from belgium, the netherlands, and luxembourg until they are equipped with a remotely controlled weapon system and machine guns. the whole package will arrive in the coming months. denmark and the netherlands , leading the aviation coalition, shared progress in developing a training course for ukrainian pilots. lithuania announced the creation of demining coalition, according to its structure, ukrainian sappers will be taught, and the participating countries will share the necessary equipment , and the reuters agency reported on the preparation of a new defense package from the united states in the amount of 1 billion and 300 million dollars, it will include ammunition, anti-aircraft drones, and not only katya, you have already stopped in detail i will not go on that, so i will only say that we are

still waiting for the official presentation of this package. katya zoryan will be needed. thank you very much for all the details. we are following closely what is happening at the rammstein meetings thanks to zoryan stepanenko. european correspondence of radio svoboda. thank you. we return to the topic of explosions on the territory of the occupied crimea. damage, what happened there, let's talk with our next guest, pavlo lekydchuk , head of non-peak programs of the center for global studies, strategy 21, on our broadcast . greetings, peacock, good morning. glory to ukraine glory to the heroes, well, these days are still restless in crimea. well, first of all, we remember another attack on the crimean bridge, about yesterday's explosion in feodosiya. and there was a fire at night at the training ground in the kirovsk district . can you tell me what could have happened there?

to be located. as far as i understand, it is no secret that there was a training ground there. but is it known what kind of weapons or troops were based there ? well, when we talk about the crimean bridge or the kerch bridge and about feodosia and about sevastopol, we must understand that these are links of the same the chain of weakening of the group opposing our advancing troops in the zaporizhzhia direction in the south of our country, each such strike, if it does not stop the supply of ammunition , fuel, lubricants, and everything else to the enemy army, then it holds it for a certain time, every hour, every day, because of such a delay with the supply of ammunition, this is the life of our soldiers today cottons on the old crimean

training ground, well, the crimeans know the old crimean training ground, the old training ground is a podgrueva garmash there is south to north, so a little exactly where the taurid highway passes. at first it was a training ground of the old crimean brigade, then of the coastal troops of the naval forces of the armed forces of ukraine, and after the occupation of crimea , it was used there mainly for the purposes of the airborne troops of the russian federation, the day before, literally there a month before the large-scale invasion of it the russian federation talked about the re-equipment of the re-designated old crimean training ground for new types of air weapons for airborne troops before they installed it there, i don’t know, but the warehouses

paratroopers were just there, and when the ammunition explodes in the old crimea now, it means that those paratroopers who are there in zaporizhzhia in the direction of melitopol are standing against our e-e troops are not getting their shells, they are not getting their missiles, well, these missiles are definitely not forever this is a good sign, it is reported that, in principle, until 11 , such a large-scale evacuation of more than 2,000 people is still taking place. well, i don’t know, i understand that there are even more people living there, that is, it is possible that even more people will be evacuated until the occupation authorities announced exactly this number and the fact that the taurid highway was blocked, that is, from the videos that are available, what can be said about how severe the damage was? is it the complete destruction of that training ground and everything that was there, and nothing can be located there anymore and they cannot do anything to save, how can you evaluate it, well, on the training ground, let them train as how everything explodes, let them train

. whoever remains alive is their problem . if there are any, who will train there? troops and more, that is, there are also artillery shells, your heavy artillery 152 mm and judging by the fireworks, there are also shots for the rsv for hail, well, this is a serious loss. well , i would say that it is serious, but it falls into a whole series of... this is not only in the crimea, but also in the south of the occupied south of ukraine, and we are in berdyansk, melitopol, and mariupol. areas where

enemy formations are bursting . because it is one thing to walk through a minefield and it's another thing to walk through a minefield when you're hit again because tons of explosives are flying from the sky, not shrapnel, shrapnel. you have to look at this in the context of not only what is happening specifically at some training ground in the occupied crimea, but also what is happening in general and you mentioned the south and all these actions. well, we will monitor what is left for us and analyze what it could be and what the consequences could be. thank you for your participation. and we talked about the explosions and

the fire at the landfills in the kirov district of occupied crimea, and then we will talk about the situation with the grain initiative, and the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, jen soltonberg , condemned russia's decision to stop participating in the black sea grain initiative. he wrote about this. on my twitter, i condemn russia's unilateral decision to withdraw from the black sea grain initiative, despite the efforts of our ally turkey and the un , russia's illegal war against ukraine continues to harm millions of vulnerable people all over the world, the president made a big mistake by withdrawing from the black sea grain initiative, french president yamanuel macron wrote in the office of the ukrainian president yesterday's attack by russian forces on odesa and mykolaiv using drones and missiles was called evidence of russia's attempt to destroy the grain agreement and stop food exports from ukraine the head of the president's office, andriy yarmak, wrote about this in his telegram to the channel. i will remind you that earlier the press secretary of the russian president, dmytro

piskov, announced the suspension of the grain agreement they say because the part of the agreement that concerns russia has not been fulfilled, meanwhile, the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, announced that the owners of the ships traveling through the grain corridor are ready to continue the initiative, even despite russia's refusals. of the minister of agrarian policy in the 19th year, olga trofimtseva and the ambassador on special assignments joined the broadcast of mrs. oli, i congratulate you , can we talk now? well, what are the possible consequences this is precisely for russia, politically, because the financial consequences. i understand that they may not be so powerful for russia. see, there is a statement that, in principle, russia continues to earn money from the sale of ukraine from the sale . grain we remember that year and we talked about the fact that russia transfers stolen grain from the occupied ukrainian territories there in its own way , that is

, there will be no economic consequences for russia for ukraine, but the political consequences can be so strong for russia that it well, i don't know there will regret or feel the consequences of abandoning this initiative. yes, thank you very much, ms. kateryna , the question is really, really . come on, i hope that there will be economic consequences for the russian side, because it's like me anyway it should be logical that if one page of an agreement or a memorandum of understanding or some other document was signed between the russian side of the united nations and turkey and unilaterally , let's just say that it does this is the step of blackmail and it comes out of this agreement like this, and even though, let's say, everyone is trying all this time somehow to keep this agreement so that it works normally, there should definitely be some kind of strengthened sanctions, and not a conversation

about what well, let's say it's possible after all we will think there how to help poor russia eh hmm it is better to sell your agricultural products or your fertilizers on the world markets eh so if we talk about the political and economic consequences, it seems to me now that these next weeks will be decisive from all points by the way, regarding the general situation with the grain initiative as such, also because we saw the statement of president zelensky, which i absolutely support, that the best option in this case would be not to react, including to such terrorist attacks like this night and thanks to the support of our partners , primarily turkey e to continue the work of the grain corridor in fact e to continue the export of ukrainian food from the ports of greater odesa from the ports of the black sea area but of course a lot will depend on the positions here

as i have already told our main partners in this matter, and diplomatic diplomatic efforts, negotiation efforts at all levels, at the technical level, consultations will i am sure will continue in the coming weeks , that is, it cannot be said that now this process has somehow completely stopped there, and it was clear also in my opinion the opinion from the kremlin's rhetoric that they still expect that they will be continued, let's call it that, because in fact, if you take a closer look, i would call it not the exit of russia's grain agreement, but the suspension of participation is why they are waiting to see how these two communities and the main partners will react to what they have done, will they go to a meeting with them, or will there still be a tougher position in the sense that, ok, how was kyiv in november 2022 leave, but i'm sorry, we have to continue working without you. that is, you do not rule out the possibility that there may be some demands , for example, from the russian side, they may be satisfied, and because of that, russia will return again to the implementation of this agreement. i personally

hope that this will not be done because ah again, this is a one-way street. if we are now talking about the basic requirements , it seems that once again it is possible to say even in quotation marks that the kremlin voiced - it is for the connection of rossilhosp bank to swift and export, then it seems to me that as soon as these conditions , although b will be partially fulfilled, new ones will appear, and this will again be another reason for such blackmail, sabotage and constant , let's say, extortion, and additional conditions that are already appearing, by the way, they were mentioned by different levels of russian officials - this the import of sg equipment for the restoration of spare parts because, apparently, with import substitution, everything is not so good, to put it mildly, and this is by the way, and again, the restoration of permits for the entry of russian ships into the ports of european countries and countries of the european union and so on and so on and so on. well, we perfectly understand that russia in this case acts absolutely, you know, according to the template

of the country of the blackmailer and terrorist, which if its conditions are fulfilled again, it will constantly find new opportunities to blackmail the world. if the position of partners, for example, turkey, will be such that turkish ships will accompany this ukrainian grain there, you see such a possibility that then even without russia , they will be able to export ukrainian grain , so moreover, it seems to me that there is no need here, you know, some kind of military weapon rattling here, it’s just that really such a clear position, which, like last year, and if it sounds fanner, he says that with all due respect, he does not respect russian colleagues, but exports should go further, including to china in including to africa, including to the countries of the near middle east, this is extremely important, and accordingly we will let through ukrainian ships with grain, this is the international fleet. by the way, these are not ukrainian ships , let's not forget this with you, so

let's say at least such a signal was already very kind, so let's wait for the official response of the turkish side to the letter of the president of ukraine that was sent to them. it's interesting. we will really follow the development of events. thank you for joining and explaining the processes are happening now olga trofim - this is you as the non-acting minister of agrarian policy in 2019, the expasol on special assignments was a guest of svoboda in the morning from monday to friday from 9:00 a.m. here on youtube on the svoboda radio channel and also on the air of the espresso tv channel we are in touch with you to talk about important events. my name is kateryna krecha, i and the whole team are freedom of the morning. i wish you a peaceful day

. it's ten o'clock on the clock. it's time to find out what 's happening in ukraine and the world. at this time , khrystyna parubiy is working in the studio, and 22-calibre onyx shaheda is the russians tonight. carried out a combined attack on ukraine, launched 31 missiles and 32 drones, reported to the air force command that the enemy's targets were critical infrastructure and military facilities, the main direction became odesa, our defenders, the sky, destroyed 13 calibers, one aviation house, 59 and 23