[000:00:00;00] he longs for daily messages or some kind of thanks in his name or addressed to britain, and he actually advised in ukraine that we, in fact, in order to secure further support, including the united states, said thank you there, because it is clear that, um, such a situation is that sometimes we criticize our partners, sometimes we demand something from our partners

, even though they have no legal obligations to us. e also, to be honest, he then adjusted his rhetoric a bit, but from the very beginning, of course, it didn’t look very good in relation to himself on the street. i’m not talking about the british. maybe it’s not very good for words. let’s say a diplomatic statement addressed to president a, who authorizes his own ambassador to represent the state in another election country and was removed . they see and you know by and large account. i now see on social media, for example, ukrainians are beginning to express their support for the ambassador, saying that he is an impeccable ambassador and so on, but i would say that at such a moment, you know, it is extremely difficult to evaluate the role and professional quality of ambassadors in a country like britain or the united states at a time like now, by and large, you should not make mistakes and then you will look like a powerful ambassador , and i don't want to, i just don't criticize the station or

the cow now or anyone else e-e sent to of those countries that we are supporting ukraine. but let's say this is absolutely so natural about the natural state. is there anything to criticize the mooring that he did not finish something in britain? it is difficult for me to say. how are you again? i did not see any moments of how it will be perceived. well, we have already seen the first post of boris johnson, who thanked him for the favor and wished him reincarnation in a different quality . britain but will it

affect relations with ukraine in any way, let's say, well, hardly to be honest, cool because of what i said, will the next ambassador be more professional, better and achieve something more, let's look at the achievements. it's unlikely that britain is doing everything possible and it's not only because they feel in ukraine, not only because there are certain sympathies, but actually in the 14th year they realized that the black sea region and ukraine as such are extremely important elements of the system of jumping the growing aggressive role of the russian federation and we became part of the strategy, that is, any next prime minister minister-minister of foreign affairs affairs or defense in the united kingdom, they will check the considerable attention paid to ukraine, they will understand that ukraine is a part of the european community, even though britain is not in the european union, but they certainly support us on this path. but the most important thing is how this future member of nato is what serves the national interests of the united kingdom

. part of the territory of ukraine well, and ukraine is going to go to belarus in general , let's hear what putin said . thanks to the soviet union, thanks to stalin's position, it received more significant land in the west of germany. that's right

. the western territories of present-day poland are stalin's gift to the poles. today's western ukraine is well known that they also dream of belarusian lands. as for the policy of the ukrainian regime, they want to do this. how is it introduced to traitors ? they want to hand over something and sell something. they will unite with the owners. i repeat, in the end , they are their business.

the speech that putin made is very reminiscent of the speech that he made before the attack, before the big attack on ukraine, or is putin just bluffing now, or is he still preparing for war with poland, lithuania and, in general , with the blockade, but it is likely because you know that losing some kind of ukraine that was invented by lenin and how you do not exist is somehow not trivial, but to be defeated by nato and to bring the crimean crisis to such a 2:0 and then come to someone compromise, saving the world from nuclear armageddon - it is possible, let's say yes, putin’s option is to keep his disfigured face and of course what would be the agreement between putin and lukashenka is to actually withdraw part of these mercenaries of the wagnerites, but on the territory of belarus he may be part of such a game and then he may try to use these eyes. well, we understand and they, in principle, in the last few weeks showed that wagner financed the entire russian federation from the very beginning , in general. again

that it is something there volunteers so who else in the miners and combiners can decide to follow these words and the corridor and work out some kind of way to leningrad, which in the russian federation was a gift given to the germans if you use the language, that is, in principle, it can be, but in any case, the impossibility of achieving any serious successes in ukraine, they push putin to look for new, let's say, new methods and new ways to fly away the attention of the ukrainian, first of all, i apologize for the russian slapstick and also show it in the west that he ready for more ridiculous actions to escalate the situation both horizontally, i.e. outside the territory of ukraine, and vertically. when he talks about any means, of course he constantly alludes to the existing menu of nuclear potential, and of course this rhetoric is used by those who are now following american affairs, and we see that

we are the trumpians. they very often use the theme that biden dragged america into the ukrainian war and it can lead to the third world war, and of course they will spread take this one propagandistic generators, i am not talking about the mask and other not quite trumpian, but quite powerful mouthpieces that have been constantly broadcasting lately to the kremlin, the kremlin, this is my dream, so i did not rule out the possibility and provocations, but the most important thing is that it is clear that this is scaring the americans and europeans by the fact that putin can go further into the territory of ukraine. do you think the west is ready for this? i think

so absolutely. mo so first of all biden and the administration, because he says that he will defend every inch of the nato territory, this applies to the percentages, so the second moment during the vilnivskyi itself, new defense plans were adopted for the eastern flank, in particular, the baltic republics, and this is very important, because it was previously assumed that russia could advance to the territory of all the republics in a certain time and capture them there in two

days. actually, they established that in two days russia will be able to seize and then nato with all its power should liberate the territory of the baltic states, you can imagine what would be left of them there, so all these factors show that the americans are 100% ready to do it, let's say, in words, and there are additional evidences, such as certain means and strategic bombers that were recently shown in sweden, and before that, it seems like six months ago in gibraltar, the americans showed their saagaye-class submarines with nuclear cruise missiles with them warheads, that is, they show not only that there is meteoric readiness, but i am actually ready for such a conflict, and that is why i think that putin will simply be an even bigger fool here, and he made a big fatal mistake for russia by openly attacking ukraine and trying to absorb it with such ridiculous actions a year ago, but what if he does something similar in poland, well, it is clear that, first of all, the poles are known for their readiness for such a conflict, they have militarized in the last the will

is powerful of course they are watching because the russians are fighting here and learning about it, and of course they are not only ready. but to be honest, i think my scarves are very happy. i want fat in the russian pike . thank you, mr. oleksandr. it was oleksandr khara, a diplomat

. we ask about this or are you satisfied with the only telethon? i didn't watch it, but i gave up your version for the moment. 69% of the viewers we surveyed on youtube said that they were dissatisfied with the only telethon. 15% were satisfied. 10 watched it, but i will quit. well, that is, 80% of our audience does not watch and is not satisfied with the only telethon. we continue the survey and at the end of the program, we will summarize the results of this vote . mykola knyazhytsky p mykola i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on the air, let's start with tkachenko's resignation, because tkachenko is resigning for the second time in three years, and twice the reason for this was cinema. once was a state cinema, and the other - this cinema, 400 million allocated for the production of series, received a lot of attention. there was also a lot of attention in social networks. they also wrote about what series the state is going to film with state funds for the state tv channel. yesterday, after the obvious reaction

of your social networks , president zelensky also joined the calls for tkachenko's resignation and said that he asked for help. gel to release tkachenko, let's hear what zelensky said at the time of such a war, the maximum state attention and therefore state resources should go to defense, it is an obvious thing, and every project that can be implemented at the expense of extra-budgetary resources must be implemented at the expense of extra-budgetary resources, and this applies to various spheres, in particular, the field of culture, museum, cultural centers, symbols, tv shows, all this is important, but now other priorities, find extra-budgetary

funds, not states. so, i suggested to the head of government two steps, the first is to find extra-budgetary funds for projects that you really need right now, there are people in the world who can help, and the second - i asked the prime minister to consider the replacement of the minister of culture and information policy of ukraine, whether zelenskyi's criticisms of tkachenko, mr. mykola, are fair. well, you know, i wanted to comment directly on tkachenko himself, because tkachenko is a system of the state machine that has not built any priorities in the field of cultural development, which definitely needs development. if we talk about tkachenko, then it is obvious that if he wanted to support ukrainian culture, he could

allocate funds not for a tv series about a carriage snitch let's say a series about the tragedy in buchi or a series or a film about our valiant defenders who are fighting at the front, if it was made in good quality and shown at international film festivals, it would definitely be understandable, but it is obvious that citizens do not understand when large amounts of money are spent on ordinary commercial commercial series that are produced by television companies in the whole world independently without the support of the state, regardless of whether there is a war or not. he was in this position there are quite a lot of mistakes, but in part these mistakes are related to the fact that the priorities of the government's cultural policy are absolutely not settled, for example, you absolutely correctly mentioned that the first time he wrote a resignation letter, and then i understood why he wrote it, because they brought out a little film that we created , which, before the full-scale invasion, fairly distributed funds for films, this was done by the cinematographers themselves, and the films that were shot by ukrainians were really outstanding, beautiful

, interesting people who watched them. increased the number of ukrainian films, so this state cinema was removed from the subordination of the ministry of culture directly subordinated to the cabinet of ministers from my point of view this is a mistake and tkachenko protested against this, i agree with him, but what he started after that, what did the ministry allocate so little to the house in general ? the channel is not a state channel in any democratic country there are private channels under the guise of the fact that this foreign media created a state channel through which money is laundered, which shows its favorites and engages in propaganda. obviously, this is absolutely unacceptable, and it was to this channel that the ministry led by tkachenko allocated funds and this channel announced a competition, and various films and tv series won in this competition. among them were those that really talk about

the war and were made by independent producers, not all of them there are bad people, they saw the announcement of the competition and submitted but there were such that raised questions about this tv series about the scumbag and this man who is talking about this rude person on the air, and i understand that many people like the tv channel, which was previously headed by oleksandr tkachenko himself and where he was doing a lot of pr. by the way, volodymyr zelenskyi made the series. he caused the most confusion in society, and it caused such misunderstanding. i think it was such a really, really big mistake. well, there were other mistakes, because from my point of view, funds for the holodomor museum should be

allocated, but society should do not whine what will these funds go to, what will this museum be? someone else is sponsoring it besides the state, especially since we will have 90 years of the famine. and all this was not done. and why was such a negative response in social networks? regarding this payment, too, although i believe that in principle it has the right and should be done, that is, if the head of a large country comes here and enters a wonderful modern museum of the famine, he will understand why it is necessary to help ukraine with funds and weapons, and here is the series - this is completely inappropriate and superfluous, and does not appear now tkachenko played the role of a goat, because we understand that practically the entire state leadership, the top state leadership, was in the cinema and these 400 million well, they were not distributed only by tkachenko or the tv channel, so it is clear that such a sum is a large budget well, it could not simply be distributed without the participation of the heads of the office of the president of ukraine

. who were close at one time or another to the president of his team, or to tkachenko, although they are essentially one team, of course he did it based on phone calls and requests, there was no transparent competition he simply could not say no, because he tried, it was his mistake he told everyone that way and the president's office said that way, and the channel where he used to work said that way and society tried to say that way, but it all does not stick together because it is not necessary to say it that way but to have a clear vision of the development of culture in conditions of war and present it exactly the most lacking was all the mistakes they themselves made, they are now trying to put it on tkachenko, who did not have the inner strength and the desire to conduct his own policy. if this policy does not suit opole, then resign earlier, he wrote a statement, but he has not resigned yet, so obviously he is a scapegoat, and it is obviously his fault

that the use of money from local communities of local bodies is being discussed quite actively during the last week self-government for various projects, well, they bought drums, then sticks for those drums, then they buried something else there, then, in the local communities, they began to build stadiums, although we know that, in principle, the championship in ukraine takes place without, uh, spectators, according to you, that’s where it’s a pity that money from the state budget is needed to be spent on during the war

. uncom they are not, they are appointed by the president at the request of the cabinet of ministers, they are not elected by the people, this is the same vertical. and here it turns out that there is not enough money in the budget due to the fact that a large part of our budget is really spent on defense, it is often spent with great problems or inappropriately, but today an article came out about how a company called lviv arsenal received a huge amount of money for armaments and did not spend it, but our military has nothing to fight for and this is the central budget, but these funds were spent and representatives of central authorities are thinking of taking these funds from local self-governments, plus there are many conflicts between representatives of the ruling party and local self-governments, as it was in kyiv, chernihiv or rivne, for example, and it is obvious that they need to make these leaders of local self-governments extreme in order to have a reason to lead military administrations and organize those budgets themselves, this is absolutely anti-democratic and wrong

, and when we talk about the fact that the money is wrong are spent by local self-government bodies, well, it can be, but local self-government bodies depend on citizens from deputies representing different parties and they should raise this issue and talk about it, if such cases really exist, unfortunately, they do exist because it is probably not very appropriate to build a stadium. in local budgets and every head of a local self-governing body suddenly receives a lot more money than it was before. so this money should not be taken from him, but explained to him that these funds should be spent on helping, for example, the same fellow citizens from your city who went to the front to buy him some weapons . what do the citizens do if there is such a surplus, it would be absolutely fair, but the awareness of all the heads of local self-governing bodies

does not exist, so it is necessary to explain it to them but i don't think that taking funds from local self-government bodies and overlapping with such expenses, replacing them with the fact that they will all be governed by the kyiv executive branch of government is the right decision, because the executive branch of government also spends money incorrectly, and this ska is a weaver. spend them on no one you need comedies, some kind of comedies, or supposedly for weapons that you won’t buy, and that’s why all this propaganda against local self-government bodies actually went to waste. i think this was one of the reasons for such irritation of the president’s office and the president himself, which prompted him to say what he says despite this, again returning to this speech of the president

. he said that he said it in church on such there are no facts, but this date is known that if we don’t finance culture, then why are we fighting? the president said it, and now he says that culture can be financed by means of budget funds, and here of course he is absolutely a speechwriter, president, i understand that the president is busy with a lot of work and affairs - that’s

true. in 0.28%. these funds include funds for a telethon, what kind of culture is this? propaganda has nothing to do with culture, the goals include funds for these comedy series, which are also difficult to call culture, this is an element of the business of television channels, which for some reason is sponsored by the state. and for culture itself, kostiv funds are very often lacking, because culture is museums, this is the protection of museum values . would be necessary instead, we spend on unnecessary money, and in this way culture does not develop. and culture during the war is really extremely important and necessary , and this year's shevchenko prize was never awarded despite the promise of the president and head of the shevchenko committee, the new yevgeny nyshchuk, that is, this topic has generally come to mind. that is, where is the shevchenko prize ? well , let's see, it's obvious that she was clumsy due to

the fact that the prize winners didn't arrange an office from my point of view, this was never wrong. the president always gave the award. they were always elected independently and very often there were such people who were uncomfortable for those presidents who had to give the award because this is already the nature of artists, writers, journalists and musicians very often that they are very often also critical of the government because they represent an independent society and our government needs to get used to it, the more we need to get used to the fact that we should somehow unite society. now i think that it is difficult. they will find a replacement for the weaver named tkachenko, after all, a professional journalist, a professional manager, he did such things that i would never agree to do in my life, he censored, as the press wrote, this television marathon . no, you will find a censor who

understands at least a little bit about culture. no this is a very serious challenge for them and i think that it can lead to a really serious crisis. moreover, tkachenko was with president zelensky from the first days, he was the director of the channel where zelensky worked. this channel financed his series, financed 90. that is, he is really one of the key members of volodymyr zelenskyi's team, and zelenskyi in this way actually turns him in because he is reacting to public dissatisfaction. the populist government cannot help but react . i hate it

it should be a way of reassessing the role of culture and cultural policy in general in the state, but unfortunately i do not see this reassessment yet. this week, the humanitarian committee of the parliament unanimously supported the presidential draft law on the english language and removed from it the controversial or those points which norms about cinema and television that touched on subtitles, that is, from the first the president proposed to play movies in cinemas with the original with english subtitles , according to you, this will find support in the verkhovna rada this norm that was voted the humanitarian committee is still there, the president of the office of the president will insist that it be as they invented. i think i know that this removal of these norms did not cause satisfaction in the office employee, but the law will be presented in the hall in the form voted by the committee without these norms, but then there will be a second reading and they may arise again. there is such a possibility, and it is good that we voted unanimously

. in english or in the original language with subtitles. simply, if it is an ordinary commercial film, there can be no more than 10% of these, and if it is a festival film, please, although the entire festival plays films in the original language, but those 10% were not attended, people in the cinema were faced with the fact that the halls were empty when the films were shown in ukrainian, because ukrainian viewers are used to dubbing, which has really become such a field of art in ukraine . in such a situation , they will simply not go to the cinema and watch uh through these are pirate platforms or through official platforms, such as netlux, companies with dubbing, where the ukrainian language is not many, they will watch these films in russian, and of course this norm was completely ill-conceived from my point of view, and it was absolutely useless to include what we removed from the norms that apply to we voted unanimously, which necessarily relate to the translation into movies and the removal of restrictions on english-language television. i think that this is a positive

moment and the hall will vote exactly in this form a we will see what will happen before the second reading. thank you, mykola. it was mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of ukraine . it was a verdict program. it was conducted by serhiy rudenko . i wish everyone a good weekend. take care of yourself and your loved ones . comment prestoyka to the address of the president we have collected everything that is known so far and will try to figure out whether such personnel changes will affect