[000:00:00;00] then to rebuild it all the more to submit universities is a stupid idea absolutely the organization of the organization should go between kyiv and lviv and in the east the lord should be quarries cargo and fields of the name of the field nothing needs to be rebuilt there what was strategically thought in advance this is my opinion like donetsk i am the survival of my graves that were destroyed in waves and so on thank you for this opinion voiced not very popular but it is goals it is valuable and you know it is so shabby vladyslav kyrychenko founder of the publishing house our format

was contact us well, colleagues they pick up the air glory to ukraine, this is a program , my name is serhiy rudenko, i congratulate everyone and wish everyone good health, the fourth freemason missile strike by the occupiers on odesa in a week, the occupiers destroy the port infrastructure and destroy the enemy, which zelenskyy is supposed to export from the war , from the post of ambassador to great britain, the ukrainian ambassador vadym prystaika, who criticized the president for his unhealthy sarcasm to prepare a set of actions to

continue the operation of the grain corridor in moscow took into custody the war criminal igor gorky na strilkov, who was once the so-called minister of defense of the dpr in butsegarna. he asked for at least until september 18 that he be accused of extremism. well, the minister of culture and this oleksandr tkachenko submitted a resignation letter from his post, we will talk about all this in the next hour, we will have oleksii hetman oleksandr harari and mykola knyazhytskyi as guests today for those who are watching us on youtube i would like to ask you to participate in our survey a single telethon, answers to questions like these, i didn't watch it, but i threw away your version, please, please write what you think about a single telethon about a unified information policy of the state during the war, because one way or another it is related to the activities of the minister of culture and information, oleksandr tkachenko. well, please don't forget to like our video, subscribe to our page on youtube and other social networks, on our broadcast, a veteran of the russian-ukrainian war, a major

of the national guard in reserve alexei hetman majora, i congratulate you and thank you for joining our broadcast. good day, let's start the situation in the south of ukraine, because for the fourth day in a row, after the crimean bridge was hit, the occupiers are shelling the south and port infrastructure, civil infrastructure, killing people, injuring people, and for the fourth day in a row, the russians are shelling odesa region with p800 onyx missiles, this is a very difficult target for air defense half a day because of the high speed and low altitude at which

the rockets move, considering the tactics used now the russians are using it shelling the south of ukraine according to your opinion. is it possible that this tactic will be used in the northeast, sumy, kharkiv, and from the north, including from the republic of belarus, how dangerous are these onyxes, and explain to our viewers why some of the ballistic missiles are still not in the south and are not caught by the ukrainian ppu. number of whether they will be 45 ground-based and without

it, it is launched by a missile that uh-uh what it is being used against an anti-ship missile, and it is now being used by the russians for the wrong purpose and they are attacking civilian objects on the ship, of course, what is the danger, why i will not, it is unlikely that they will be used in the north, in the south, it is attacking. well, they are firing from the crimean peninsula around the junk, maybe somewhere else there are these launchers that were launched before the missile launched and it is impossible to see because this launcher is passive. it stands there, camouflaged under a tree and it's hard to see or it deploys quickly, it is also mobile, it does not stand still, it will be hidden somewhere underground, well, relatively speaking, it left, they launched and left, why is this missile dangerous, it can rise to a high altitude of up to 14 km, accelerate , but at the end of the flight, it flies very low, it is 10, well, plus or minus 10 m above the water. flies over the water well, not

so high that the revolutionary station can see at a distance of about 15-17 km there, and it has already gained a high speed and, besides, it is fast, and it was possible to see it about a minute and a half before it hits the targets, this is all the time we have in our combat calculations so that it can be tracked, captured, escorted, given to the teams on our launch base of our missile systems so that they make a launch at a meeting from the side and destroy this missile. unfortunately, the news is bad in that that this

rocket flies from the sea at a low altitude will not even be able to intercept the contents of the petriv missile complex, because the petryk missile complex is actually used against a ballistic missile that is not attacked from the stratosphere and it is built in such a way that it does not see what is flying below 50 m, it is written in its technical specifications, so it is very difficult to fight these missiles with the modern means of our enemy, such as onyx. unfortunately, they can still hit targets. goals well , where else? well, everything that does not look like the coast of the black sea of the sea, is it possible to intercept them? well, we have already intercepted them, but you just have to understand that this exercise is a difficult situation, and most likely you have to try to intercept them. well, as soon as possible, or at the launch site, if it is possible to calculate where they are going to launch or before they have already dropped to 10 m and 5 along

the side . they started on the day the grain agreement expired when russia said that they will, among other things, attack the grain corridor, the ministry of defense announced that the russian federation, or rather the ministry of attack, intends to attack all commercial ships of the black sea laboratory that are heading to ukrainian ports, they say that these commercial ships may have weapons in response

. according to your in this confrontation in the black sea, who can end this confrontation, put an end to it, that is, turkey as a country that has a sufficiently powerful fleet that can, well, not turn the black sea into an internal sea of ​​the russian federation, how do they imagine what they did with the sea of ​​azov, that is, who can be a policeman there and who should defuse this situation ? you have to hold on away from people who suggest that it is very simple to solve everything here, this is a problem that can be solved in a few steps, or are there several such components that can be seen at once, well, first of all, about the ships that move to our ports, things like that have been promised, but it is not entirely clear whether they will fulfill

it or not . this is the escort of these ships. ships that are fast, that are maneuverable and that have such weapons that they can repulse any attack from the black sea fleet of the russian federation. i am not sure that i can get to the point of direct combat clashes between the black sea fleet of russia and the fleet of turkey, but if they accompany, maybe the russians will somehow stop it so that they do not attack and judge about our ability to sink some ships there again, some ships that are going to the russian parties, well, for

that, we have limited possibilities, uh, we don't we can use even if we had long-range missiles such as, well, for example, this is a scalpel, which can be in the export version, not in the export or domestic version, was transferred in ukraine according to some additional protocol and has a range of more than 500 km. that is, we could destroy these ships terroristically, but it is unlikely that we can launch these missiles, they are handed over to us through civilian ships, because if the information comes that we, for example , british or french missiles were destroyed , which ones this is a tanker. i think that they will stop us to supply these rockets or at all weapons, that is, this is our partner, so we will not have the right to do it and the only thing we have to attack such ships are to try to attack these e-e with surface drones that it was attacked by the kerch cities. the distance they can overcome these drones . ь the dress that ours is

civil here and in fact it will be most likely to transport some kind of weapon for the russian federation, why am i saying this? i am sure that they can fly to the distance, they will have enough distance. because it is precisely these drones that blew up the kerch town, it is no longer a big secret that it was attacked from below and not from above, because there is no damage from above. and this destruction was from below. let's just see. to understand that these drones sailed along, well, no along or bent the crimean peninsula and sailed to the kerch strait, this is a long distance, so if they are launched from this very mykolaiv oblast or odesa region to

the ships that are somewhere inside the black sea. no one is going to reach our place. it is quite possible that they are sailing there . in russia, this will affect the insurance of these vessels there very large sums are spent on insuring the ship. i can wash there 10-12 billion. these insurance policies cost 10-12 billion. well, when there is a big danger, the international company can refuse to insure these ships, and then they simply cannot, they will not be able to. well, they will not move if there is no insurance on it. the company will not remain because of this, to transport this faster than this. this is exactly the component. the most important thing was not that we left these ships to flood. and what we emphasized about

that that we can do it and it is very serious now, i think there is serious work in these companies, vsedoplasts, if you do it at all, and how is it, how is it to insure these cargoes, what are the speeches to the russian parties? it seems to me that this was planned three times, in the meantime, we will be able major, on july 21, under the chairmanship of the president of ukraine, a meeting of the supreme commander-in-chief was held, during which they talked about preparing a set of actions to continue the work of the grain corridor of the ministry of foreign affairs to work out similar diplomatic steps well i.e. ukraine is moving gradually, now they have also increased security policies, i.e. this complicates seafaring for the russians and they have to feel for themselves the insurance companies of the russian federation, they can insure as much as i can’t be wrong. well, it seems that for the sum of no more than 1.5 billion they cannot insure what they have, so that how can a tanker be insured there , for example. and the matter of what you say is that we are really considering issues not only about the convoy that can be provided by the turkish fleet

and also about the fact that we can move er territorial waters, according to the agreement of bulgaria and romania, to attack any vessels in the territorial waters, any vessel in the territory of ukraine is tantamount to an attack on ukraine, and i am sure that the russians are ready to attack any country that is still part of the nato alliance, so, once again, this is a difficult question, but it can be solved simply by understanding that there are many components and which one prevails, which one is more important, which one is less important, they are all important and must be considered indeed in the complex, but the main thing is that no, well, this is not necessary it is necessary to work to frighten. in general, the issue of renewing this corridor can, in principle, be resolved. in principle, it is more work, rather, after all, it is not our military, which is ready to be drowned by floods, but our diplomacy, which must work out these mechanisms, insurance policies, movement through the territorial waters of other countries, a different spirituality. i think that this is quite

possible because the russians are doing everything, we understand that they have millions of tons left there since last year in this year she has a big harvest, considering how much they went to the kherson region. they want to artificially create some kind of food crisis in those countries that we supply for our increase so that the people there can eat and then show themselves as peacekeepers, as people who are ready to start selling their grain for such a small amount of money in this country

. iv well rather than all this well this the solution is the political movement of the russian federation. but we are also. as literate people say, and we understand that the only thing that needs to be done is that it needs to be worked out. so, i think that our diplomacy is able to work it out so that the education that we prepared for us already on t. they just arranged a coven, let's go let's see, let's take a huge step forward, a huge step forward, in spite of those greedy people who are waiting for everything to stabilize and everything will be. it's double that it will end, it's just beginning, and everything is still ahead, so the greedy people made a mistake, control of the black sea should be in the hands of the russian army and the fleet, and we are ready to fight in turkey

. riya rumania means bulgaria rumania eto just the nato bases in bulgaria are there all along the coast of our citizens, they will start to demonstrate everything there, don't worry in this sense, there are no problems. no, this is not the state with which it makes sense to fight, so let's go without the caps of the zakydatsky declared. that is, the calm sea is scurrying, it is necessary to scurry in the rest, but so that they would grind less nonsense there, major, what do you have to say about this hysteria in general , which is starting in russia, where they get a checker and start shouting black sea

ours and in general we are all er-er there now let's break bulgaria, romania - these are not nato base countries at all, well, that is, how far will they go with this? well, you know, if you were to get to the level of er, to this level, on the disks. well, martsonko, you said that you would never start arguing with fools, because entering into an argument lowers the level of them, but they will crush you with their experience there. well, if they try to laugh at it, they want to er-e fight with nato in the black sea. well, let's imagine that you will go there as part of the sixth fleet in the united states, what are we talking about, only turkey itself without help for example, a photo of other countries above, especially an american photo, is capable of drowning the will of the party of the russian federation, that’s why they, well, they have painted something in their heads, they start talking about something, they want to know if some

kind of hostilities begin directly on the black sea. well, here ukraine can only, as they say, morally support our partners in this confrontation between the fleet of countries for maintenance and, er, russian megaphotos, well, this war will not last long, we do not have such a slot that could take part in this we can again only to help and only to watch and be very excited there, we are sorry, but if it started well, maybe it would not be too bad because the chances of the russian black sea fleet against the united states of turkey are not countries, but the nato base, even romania and bulgaria. well, the russian black move simply has no chance. therefore, you know, it is not very good to say so

. such a decision and try to attack a nato country in the black sea and everyone would see it, but we would see it in russia, we would see what happened to the polish fleet and how quickly it happened to it, if even we, not having powerful weapons, sank the flagships in it and the cruiser moscow, then what else is floating there, well, in general, here is the question. i think that in a few days everything will go to the bottom, and well, it would not be bad . hetman is a veteran of the russian-ukrainian war, a major of the national guard in the reserve. thank you for participation in the program, we work live on the espresso tv channel. well, not on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are now watching us live on youtube, please like this video and subscribe to our channel. well, take part in our vote. today we ask you about the information policy of the state during the war. are you satisfied with the only telethon ? in the comments below, we can

contact oleksandr khara, a diplomat and an expert on issues of foreign policy and security and politics of the center of defense strategies, oleksandr. i congratulate you. i am glad to see you on our broadcast. good evening, mr. serhii. the iliac bitterness of

the former minister of the so-called minister the defense of the dpr, the first accused of extremism, was put in a prison until september 18th, and well, it looks like the terrorist putin arrested the terrorist . words addressed to putin and everyone said, well, behind him there is some kind of kremlin tower it stands and this tower actually covers strilkovo, well, you know, literally a couple of days ago, we had an expert conference on the crimean platform, and we discussed the possible future of the russian federation. there are different approaches to how we evaluate what this entity is. in my deep conviction, modern russia is an unsustainable state, an unsustainable society and an unsustainable leadership. in fact, putin is now trying to protect it. after he was there for three days, it is unknown where he was.

he was unable to show that he is a match who axed in in the toilets, we will read the terrorists, and in fact, in this way, he destroyed the appearance of such a person who controls everything, so everyone is afraid and he is so powerful that he can suppress everyone. that is, it is just another horkinsy, another crack in this image of such a new stalin, who can be called whatever you want . of the russian

federation. of course, he is responsible for almost all the deaths three hundred e passengers and pilots are less than 17 and this has already been proven in court, it is difficult to change anything here, but on the other hand, you know, he has been very useful recently, as he has quite reasonedly criticized the helplessness of the russian political and military leadership, showed the problems that exist . why is russia losing this war? grana so of course we can watch with pleasure let's hope that we will hear some additional, beautiful, patriotic words like this, patriotic sir, which will show exactly how it was orchestrated in ukraine, that is, in fact, how they started this war, well, what hmm, let's say so. his life and all those henchmen who fought since the 14th year, who hate all of us, this

life is dangerous, i understand that by the way , anthony blinken made a very good joke. he said that here in nato the door is open, the policy is to open the door, and in russia the door has been open for centuries, so actually girkin should be afraid of such a possible participation, so let's look at the big picture, all of them will die in history if they know more or less well, they understood that russia always destroys even those who most loyally served the regime, and in the tsarist times , under the russians, let's remember how the same sticks of the most loyal revolutionaries were destroyed leninists, then

stalinists. it's just a grind, because it's built that way this government can only rely on theory. it can continue to suppress the subjects of the russian federation or the empire or the soviet union and the constant export of aggression from the outside , so everything will be logical and we will see how this case will end . in order to get out from under sanctions from international isolation to hand over pawns to let's say so that they would be tried at the international level well, of course, the example of the former yugoslavia, which criminals were handed over to the international tribunal of a special poly-yugoslavia, it can be a precedent, so i certainly hope that in the family, both international and ukrainian, including, there will be concern that he will not just

die there from uh, i don't know whether there is an awl that can be shoved under his ribs like this they do extremely that it would be better if he were convicted legally yes that is flawless and then served his sentence as it should be, let's go back to ukraine and to personnel changes, because today i learned that the president fired the ukrainian ambassador vadym prystaik from the post of ambassador to great britain, and it is connected with the fact that he criticized the president in advance for the unhealthy sarcasm that sounded in zelensky's words when he responded to the criticism in absentia, he responded to zach ide, the minister of defense of great britain, and then he simply said

that it was well, it's just unhealthy sarcasm to say about the fact that we should wake up every morning, as zelensky said, and we will thank, thank, thank great britain. in your opinion, were there any reasons for the removal of the guard from office, considering that after all, great britain was and remains our main partner in this war. one of the main partners is great britain, the first to give us the weapons that the americans did not give . there

are three premieres, or rather, three premieres and they are ukrainian interests actively lobbying, or did prystayko not finalize it? well, what is the reason in your opinion? well, really, first of all, i agree with the special role of the united kingdom in e.e. let's say so in supporting ukraine starting from the 14th year, and well, britain was the one who began to help us rebuild our naval forces and actively help in general e.e. the defense forces of ukraine and will absolutely correct that not one prime minister did this ben volos is well, i don't know how you can call him a friend with a capital letter, eh, i hope so one day there will be a street named after him, and to be honest, the beginning of this situation looks quite strange to me, because people, especially journalists, picked up on this hype, interpreting the words of the minister himself not quite correctly, because he said from the very beginning that he didn't want daily news or any thanks in his name or to britain, and he actually advised in ukraine that we, in fact, in order to secure further support in this regard among the united states said thank you there because it is clear that such a situation sometimes occurs we criticize our partners sometimes we