[000:00:00;00] you are absolutely right that not only the prime minister did this, but there is ben volos. well, i don't know how i can call him with a capital letter. i hope that one day there will be a street named after him, and to be honest, the beginning of this situation looks quite strange to me, because people, especially journalists

. my name or address in britain a he actually advised in ukraine that we, in fact, in order to gain further support, including from the united states, we said thank you there, because it is clear that such a situation is that sometimes we criticize our partners, sometimes we demand something from our partners, legal obligations, and so far, they do not have anything with us. it didn't look very good in relation to himself on the street. i'm not talking about the british. maybe it's a diplomatic statement addressed to his own president, who authorizes his own ambassador to represent the state in another electoral country and was removed. i don't know. to be honest, maybe there are some other complaints about his work. although i don't see such complaints in my public sphere, and you know by and large

who can say what he is there is an impeccable ambassador and so on, but i would say at such a moment, you know, it is extremely difficult to assess the role and professional quality of an ambassador in a country like britain or the united states at a time like now, by and large, you should not make mistakes and then you will look like a powerful ambassador, and i don’t want to. i just don’t criticize the anchor or the cow now or any other ambassador in those countries who are the champion and support of ukraine . yes it is absolutely so natural

about the natural state is there anything to criticize it's difficult for me to say that he didn't do anything for britain. again, i didn't see any moments of how it would be perceived. well, first we saw boris johnson's post, uh, who wished to thank him for the service and wished him to be reincarnated in some other quality. i think that he will be warm and they will say goodbye to him warmly in britain . said whether the next ambassador will be more professional and better and achieve let's look at something more about the achievements. it is unlikely that britain is doing everything possible, and this is not only because they sympathize with ukraine, not only because there are certain sympathies, but actually in the 14th year they realized that the black sea region and ukraine as such are extremely important elements of the system of jumping the growing aggressive role of the russian federation and we became part of the strategy, that is, any next prime minister, minister of foreign affairs or defense of the united kingdom, they will

check they will understand a lot about ukraine that ukraine is part of the european community. although britain is not in the european union, they definitely support us on this path. but the most important thing as a future member of nato is that it serves the national interests of the united kingdom.

namely putin thanks to the soviet union, thanks to stalin 's position, poland received significant land in the west of germany. this is exactly how the western territories of today's poland are. this is stalin's gift to the poles.

as for the policy of the ukrainian regime, they want to do this . how is it good for traitors to surrender something to sell? they will rally with the owners. i repeat, in the end, their business will not be interfered with. well, as for belarus. well, this is part of the union state and the unleashing of aggression against belarus will mean aggression against the russian federation. we will respond to this with all the means we have. voted before the attack before the big attack on ukraine or is putin just bluffing or is he still preparing for a war with poland, with lithuania and in general with the nato bloc, it is so likely because you know that losing in ukraine, which was invented by lenin and which does not exist, it is somehow not pompous, but to lose to nato and bring the caribbean crisis to such a 2:0 and then come to some kind of compromise saving the world from nuclear armageddon is possible and with let's say so, putin's option is to keep

his distorted face, and of course that's what it is there would be an agreement between putin and lukashenka to actually withdraw some of these mercenaries from the wagnerites, but on the territory of belarus it may be part of such a game and putin may try to use them. well, we understand and they, in principle, in the last few weeks have shown that wagner financed the entire russian federation from the very beginning, but in general, it was part of the war machine, let's say so , but now of course they can switch and kaza said again that it's some kind of volunteer there , so who else is a miner and and combiners which

they can decide to go to these words and the corridor and work out some kind of way to leningrad, which in the russian federation was presented and given to the germans, if you use the language, that is, in principle, it can be, but in any case, the impossibility of achieving any serious success in ukraine, they push putin to look for new, let’s say, new methods and ways to divert the attention of the ukrainian , first of all. horizontal, i.e. outside the territory of ukraine, and vertical. when he talks about any means, of course he constantly hints at the existing menu of nuclear potential, and of course that rhetoric is used by those who are now monitoring american affairs, and we see that we are the trumpians. they very often use the theme that biden dragged america into the ukrainian war and it could lead to the third world war, and of course they will spread this propaganda material, i will not

tell you about the mask e and others e not at all trembians, but quite powerful mouthpieces that have been constantly broadcasting lately the human crimea of ​​the kremlin, having this, therefore, i did not exclude the possibility and provocations, but the most important thing is that it is clear that this is scaring the americans, europeans, in the fact that putin can go further. ukraine. do you think the west is ready for this ? i think so absolutely

. defend every inch of nato territory this is 100% and the second moment during vilnivsk itself was adopted a new plan for the defense of the eastern flank, in particular the baltic republics, and this is very important because it was previously assumed that within a certain time russia could advance to this territory and seize all the republics and actually there in two days. if i am not mistaken, in 2016 rennes-corporelchin held games and er. in fact, they established that in two days russia would be able to seize and then nato all it was not enough to liberate the territory of the baltic states with its own strength , one can imagine what would have remained of them there all these factors show that the americans are 100% ready to implement it, and there are additional evidences, such as certain means and strategic warships that were recently shown in sweden, and before that, it seems like six months ago in gibraltar, the americans showed their saagae-class submarines with cruise missiles with nuclear warheads, that is, they show not only that there is a metric readiness, but actually readiness for such a conflict, and therefore i think that putin will be here even more what a fool

he was, he made a big fatal mistake a mistake for russia was opened by attacking ukraine and trying to absorb it with such ridiculous actions a year ago, but what if he does something similar towards poland, well, it is clear that , first of all, the poles are known for their readiness for such a conflict, they have militarized in recent times, and it is quite powerful. glad, i want

fat from russian militants. thank you, mr oleksandr this was oleksandr hara, a diplomat, and we continue our broadcast, we continue to work on the air of the espresso tv channel, as well as on our platforms on facebook and youtube. for those who are currently watching us live, please like our video, subscribe to our channels and take part in our vote. today we ask you about this , are you satisfied with the only telethon? that they are dissatisfied with a single telethon 15% satisfied 10 watched but quit, that is, 80% of our audience does not watch and is not satisfied with the only telethon on

this actually we continue the survey and at the end of the program we will summarize the results of this vote, we are in touch with people's deputy of ukraine mykola knyazhytskyi p mykola i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on the air, let's start with the resignation of tkachenko, because tkachenko has resigned for the second time in three years, and twice the reason for this was the movie odin once a state cinema and another. this is a cinema of 400 million allocated to the production of the tv series received a great deal of criticism in social networks. they also wrote about what series the state is going to film with state funds for the state tv channel rain. yesterday, after the obvious reaction of your social networks, president zelensky also joined the calls for the resignation of tkachenko and said that he asked shmygel to fire tkachenko .

implemented at the expense of extra-budgetary resources should be implemented at the expense of extra-budgetary resources and this applies to various fields and in particular the field of culture, museums, cultural centers, symbols, tv shows, all this is important, but now find other priorities, find extra-budgetary funds, not the state. so, i proposed to the head of government two steps: the first is to find extra-budgetary funds for projects that you really need right now , there are people in the world who can help, and the second, i asked the prime minister to consider replacing the minister

of culture and information policy of ukraine or fair criticism of zelenskyi against tkachenko and mykola well, you know, i wanted to comment directly on tkachenko himself, because tkachenko is a system of the state machine that has not at all built any priorities in the field of cultural development, which definitely needs development. if we talk about tkachenko and who it is, it is obvious that if he wanted to support ukrainian culture, he could allocate funds not for a tv series about povoroznyuk, but, let's say, for a tv series about the tragedy in buch or for a tv series or a film about valiant defenders of ours who are fighting at the front if it is

it was made with high quality, it was shown at international film festivals, of course. this could be understood, but it is obvious that citizens do not understand when quite large amounts of money are spent on ordinary commercial commercial series, which in the whole world, television companies produce independently without the support of the state, regardless of whether there is a war or not. therefore, it is obvious that it was his mistake. regulated, for example, you absolutely correctly mentioned that the first time he wrote a resignation letter, and then i understood why he wrote it, because they removed the state cinema that we created, which before the full-scale invasion fairly distributed funds for films, this was done by the cinematographers themselves, and the films made by ukrainians were really outstanding, beautiful, interesting, people watched them . internet of ministers from my point of view this

a mistake, and tkachenko protested against it, i agree with him, but what he started after that, what did the ministry do, it allocated so little home in general, it is not rain, you have made a mistake so far, but the tv channel is home - this is a ukrainian state channel, unlike the russian channel dozh, which works in exile, so this state channel does not exist in any democratic country, there are no state channels, there are private channels and public broadcasting in us. they created it. the government created it under cover supposedly because of what it is foreign media created a state channel through which money is laundered, which shows its favorites and engages in propaganda. obviously, this is absolutely unacceptable, and it was for this channel that the funds of the ministry headed by tkachenko were allocated, and this channel announced a competition, and in this competition various films and

tv series won. this man's troublemaker what a jerk this brat is on the air and i understand that, many people like him very much as a pr guy of that tv channel that was previously headed by oleksandr tkachenko by the way, volodymyr zelenskyi made tv series, he stirred up society the most and it caused such a lack of acceptance . i think it was such a really, really big mistake. well, there were other mistakes because from my point of view, funds for the holodomor museum need to be allocated, but it is necessary to communicate well with society to explain what these funds will go to, what the museum will be. anyone else it is sponsored in addition to the state, especially since we will have 90 years of famine. and all this was not done. and why was such negativity raised in social networks? regarding this payment, too, although i believe that in principle it has the right and should be done, because if the head of a large country comes here and enters the wonderful modern museum of the famine, he will understand why it is necessary to help ukraine with funds and weapons , but the tv series - this is completely inappropriate and redundant

, and is it not now t kachenko as a goat happened, because we understand that practically all the state leadership, the top leadership of the state was in the cinema, and these 400 million well, they were not distributed only by tkachenko or the tv channel, well, that is, it is clear that such a large amount is budgetary. well, it could not simply be distributed without the participation of the heads of the office of the president of ukraine. well, there were people in the competition commission who directly produced the tv series 95 quarter and 95 quarter won several projects and other companies are connected either with 1+1 or with other structures that were close once or that to the president of his team or that to tkachenko although they are essentially the same team of course he did it based on phone calls and requests there was no transparent competition there, we just couldn't say no because he tried it was his mistake he told everyone that way and the president's office said that way and the channel where he used to work said that way and society tried to say that way and it all doesn't stick together because it's not

the way to say it they are now they are trying to focus on tkachenko, who had no internal strength and the desire to conduct his own policy. if this policy does not correspond to opole, then resign earlier, he wrote a statement, but he has not resigned, so it is obvious that he is a scapegoat and it is obvious that he is to blame for what is happening in the last week , the use of money from local communities of local self-government bodies for various projects is being discussed quite actively, well, they bought

drums, then sticks for those drums, then something else was buried there, then in part of the local communities they began to build stadiums, although we know that in principle the championship in ukraine takes place without spectators, according to you, it’s a shame what money from the state budget is spent on during the war. takes people this is the same vertical. and here we have that there is not enough money in the budget due to the fact that a large part of our budget is really spent on defense, it is often spent with great problems or is it inappropriate, but today there was an article about how a company called lviv arsenal received a huge amount of funds for armaments and did not spend them, but our military has nothing to fight for and this is the central budget, but these funds were spent and representatives of the central authorities are thinking of taking these funds from

local self-government bodies, plus there is a lot conflicts between the representatives of the ruling party and the local self-government body, as it was in kyiv, chernihiv or rivne, for example, and it is obvious that they need to make these leaders of local self-government bodies extreme in order to have a reason to lead military administrations there and organize those budgets themselves, this is absolutely anti-democratic and wrong, and when we talk about the fact that money is incorrectly spent by local self-government bodies, well, it can be but local self-government bodies it depends on the citizens, on the deputies who represent different parties, and they should raise this issue and talk about it

. if such cases really exist, unfortunately they do exist, because it is probably not very advisable to build a stadium. earlier, you should not take this money from him, but explain to him that these funds should be spent, well, on help, for example, with your contacts from your city who went to the front to buy weapons for him and the mafia, what do citizens do if there is such a surplus, it would be absolutely fair , but all the heads of local self-government bodies do not have such an awareness, so it is necessary to explain this to them, but i do not think that it is necessary to take funds from local self-government bodies and, overlapping with such expenses, replace them with what they will everyone is guided by the kyiv executive branch of government is the right decision because the executive branch of government also spends money incorrectly and this scandal with tkachenko was precisely the result of these processes because only the government began to talk about the fact that the expenses

of local self-government bodies are not always correct . that of local self-government bodies actually went into the sand. i think this was one of the reasons for such irritation of the president's office and the president himself, which prompted him to say what he said despite this. again, returning to this speech of the president, i want to remind you that during the presentation of the shevchenko prize in the 20th year, the president voiced a quote attributed to churchill. he said that he said it in cherche , well, there are no such facts, but the quote is known that if we do not finance culture then what are we for?

we are fighting, the president said this, and now he says that culture can be financed from outside the budget, and here of course, it is absolutely speechwriter-presidents, i understand that the president is busy with a lot of work and affairs - it is true. yes, but the speechwriter must have confused something and forgot that he wrote two years ago that the president cannot contradict himself . these funds include funds for the telethon well, as a culture, it is clean propaganda has nothing to do with culture, it includes funds for these comedy series, which are also difficult to call culture, this is an element of the business of television channels, which for some reason is sponsored by the state. and for culture itself, there is often a lack of funds, because culture is museums, this is the protection of museum values ​​- these are children's music and art schools, these are higher educational institutions that teach culture, these are theaters that are state -owned

. culture does not develop but culture during the war is really extremely important and necessary, and this year's shevchenko prize was never awarded despite the promise of the new yevgeny nyshchuk, the president and head of the shevchenko committee, that is, this topic has generally come to mind. that is, where the shevchenko prize raffle should take place in the fall, and he promised that those who were voted for by the jury of this prize will receive it. that, from my point of view, it was wrong, this has never happened . the president always handed them over and they were always elected independently and very often there were people who were uncomfortable for those presidents to whom they had to present the award, because this is already the nature of artists, writers, journalists, and musicians very often that they are very often critical of the government because they lead an independent society and our government needs to get used to this, the more we need to get used to the fact that we should somehow unite society. now i think how difficult it will be for them to find a replacement

for the weaver tkachenko, after all, she is a professional a journalist, a professional manager, he did such things that i would never agree to do in my life, i censored this television marathon as the press wrote. but at the same time, i was also involved in culture and tried to explain something, and as i already said, i wanted to be good and bad, and i did shameful things and those things that are useful for society, but you will find a good cultural manager who will agree to be a censor . a serious crisis moreover

tkachenko was with president zelensky from the first days, he was the director of the channel where zelenskyi worked. this channel financed his tv series in the 95th quarter. that is, he is really one of the key members of volodymyr zelenskyi's team, and zelenskyi actually surrenders him in this way because he is reacting to public dissatisfaction . from this one re-evaluations unfortunately, not yet this week, the humanitarian committee of the parliament unanimously supported the presidential bill on the english language and removed from it the controversial or the norms of cinema and television that touched on subtitles, that is, since the first president proposed to play movies in cinemas with the original with english subtitles, according to you, this norm that was voted by the humanitarian committee is already there, is the president's office still there

? the president will insist that it be since they invented i think i know that this removal of these norms has caused dissatisfaction in the office worker, but in the hall the law will be made in the form that the committee voted without these norms will then be a second read a regular commercial movie can be no more than 10%, and if it is a festival film, please, even though the entire festival plays films in the original language, but those 10% did not go to the cinema, people were faced with the fact that the halls were empty when the films were played in ukrainian. because ukrainian viewers are used to dubbing, which has really become such a field of art in ukraine, eh, and ukrainian viewers. obviously, in such a situation , they will simply not go to the cinema and watch eh through

pirate platforms or through official platforms such as non-netflix companies with dubbing where the ukrainian language is not much, they will watch these films in russian, and of course this norm was completely ill-conceived from my point of view, and it was completely included in it for nothing that we removed from it the norms that concern we voted unanimously, which concern necessarily the translation into the cinema and the lifting of restrictions on television for the english language. i think that this is a positive moment and the hall will vote exactly in this form . was mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of ukraine. it was the verdict program was conducted by serhiy rudenko i wish everyone a good weekend take care of yourself and