[000:00:00;00] killed his and advised him, this will be an absolutely correct description of the situation, ukrainian agrarians are saving the world from a new well, but now we will see on the other side of the barricade another person who is interested in this book, this is vladimir putin, in principle, you saw that russia did not want to negotiate about this zone, but it was forced to go to it for two reasons, the first reason related to its special relationship with turkey, because at that time turkey was turning into such a quiet haven

for the russian oligarchy i remember roman abramovich at the negotiations in istanbul so that he would meet with rudogon himself. well, this also shows a lot. and roman abramovich may be one of vladimir putin's wallets. it's definitely money. the second point is the global south itself. putin was aware that the countries of the global rooster could consider him responsible for what is not happening. where er, er, product nominations are increasing in price. but russia started talking about withdrawing from the agreement. just a few weeks after its it was achieved why it did not work out again, really thanking rodogan, and even non-organs, i will tell you christina and his choice of president, russia was interested in the fact that bardagran won because she believed that any other winner before the presidential elections of turkey would be closer to the united states than erdogan, after cardigan won, it was obvious that the agreement would not be extended. by the way, even before the elections, they said about it that this was most likely the last moment for terdogan, by and large, to simply speculate on the elections when he talks to putin

them because he says what you want to impersonate to me, it looks like this, and russia continued for three months. then for another three months, it didn’t even continue because the language had to work. now we see that putin is in a situation where he understands that the war is going on for a long time and that he needs to reduce the support for ukraine from the west.

it is necessary to organize a migration crisis that the global north starts hunger in order for hunger to the global rooster, it is necessary to raise the prices of grain at the same time putin is going to look absolute ukrainian grain as much as two and a half percent of all that grain according to the grain agreement is two and a half percent, but the countries of europe and the people's republic of china will have to buy grain on other markets at a higher price, and this means that the price of products in all the poorest countries will also increase in any case, so it will be possible to convince some sections of the population that they did not die of hunger, but relatively speaking, today egypt condemned this rejection of the agreement putin is no longer going to help egypt with grain egypt can buy

grain at higher prices just people in the egyptians cannot buy it at the price that can be offered by the market. and the state has no way to subsidize it. and this is the case in many countries. that is, it will turn like a domino. it falls. putin wants it to fall. the only possibility for him is to return to the new year when he saw that he is considered the only culprit . what will happen at the russia africa summit? what will happen if putin decides to talk to the grain if

he is held directly responsible? tension he can start to think, but it is obvious that at the moment he does not just want to think, he wants to destroy the infrastructure itself, that is , they say that it is conditional, he foresees a situation in which the countries of the global rooster will force him to return to the grain agreement. it was supplied in the first periods of its existence, it was no longer supplied in this way, in principle, he is barely now acting completely competently. he is waiting for the countries of the global south for their leaders to make claims. he thinks that

he may have to. if these claims are already severe enough, or if erdogan begins to blackmail us with something, let's say, his money is mine in turkish banks. says well, well, well, i'm fine well, i will go to the meeting not in ukraine, not by violence, but in africa, because i want to save africa. i understand that it is not possible to save africa just like that at the expense of our charitable contributions. well, at this moment there will be a question: can ukraine receive all these huge ships? yes, no, that is, everything that can be destroyed, he will try to destroy. that is why it is so important that we preserve it as we can . by what we have been discussing now in fact, many people have questions about why was mr. prystaik dismissed from the post of ambassador of ukraine to great britain and northern ireland. we are also talking about another related position. the fact is that he was a permanent representative of ukraine in an international intergovernmental organization, which is a specialized

agency of the united nations, an international maritime organization. shipping and this is now on the agenda. and an absolutely clear rule of any civil service is that a civil servant appointed to his position by the president of a certain state does not publicly criticize the head of state until the moment of his dismissal from civil service. if the civil servant publicly criticizes the head of state or state institutions, he should be dismissed from his position. by the way, it is more professional to resign from his position before the moment

of criticism if the civil servant realizes the fact that he is not on the right track with the state or with the civil service, he can make a statement that will lead to his resignation, this has also happened repeatedly in the history of the civil service of any state. there is nothing to discuss here at all. the civilized world looks like this at the expense of alternatives. well, an important country is a matter for the ministry of foreign affairs. it must propose suitable candidates to the president of ukraine. he must decide. many people doubt that it will be possible to find specialists. this is a problem of any civil service in ukraine. it has been observed since the beginning of the ring of the 80s, the beginning of the 90s of the last century, and of course, uh, in our time, it has only intensified . russia and this

information from the state border service ukraine is confirmed to be coming even there, it is going to do some business already in belarus. well, some analysts believe that there is a threat of the wagnerian forces advancing, perhaps in the bixuar corridor, i.e., kolingrad. do you think this could happen here and now or under more favorable conditions if we proceed from the axiom that russia is not ready for a conflict with the north atlantic alliance . because such a conflict could lead to a nuclear war, an exchange of nuclear strikes and

serious losses in e-e russian statehood as such, we remain in this position all the more, we understand very well if you see that ukraine is fighting with transferred western equipment and not at all the most modern and even with removed some microcircuits that something and this is already causing the russians to panic, then the question arises, what are some wagners going to do? they all gave up all their heavy weapons when they went to belarus and went there naked and bareheaded. why are they going to fight with the polish army or there with the army of other nato member countries? which are located on the territory of poland or can to be the result of an attack on poland if we believe that this axiom does not work because that's what certain e-e analysts want and that russia is ready for a war with nato then the question may arise why do you stop to tell us that it's all normal we are at war with russia then russia will fight with poland and latvia and lithuania with some other e-e countries that we all don't know about our military analysts or not ours so is this all a delusion or are we living maybe in this world where russia does not want a nuclear

conflict and then in this world we have one i hope that when this war will end, i don't know when it will be 20-30 years from this century, but when it ends, someday there will be security. someday we will become a normal, peaceful country, or we are just a pearl of war during the second world war. then the first swallow was poland, and then you know, france, belgium, the netherlands, norway. who did not remember what was already in poland ? the battles on the kursk arc were already the death of poland

, or we agree with the fact that nato is exactly that that this bloc with nuclear weapons is a clear barrier on the way to the possible ambitions of the russian political leadership, what is putin saying at the same time? he read another history book and he liked it. this is always a problem of people who have never read in their old age . no land russian russia can't give them back to germany or germany probably won't take it because all this is complete delusion. i'm not saying that i don't know, do you realize that before the war poland was still more territory than after the war, but its territory included the territory that is now the western territories of ukraine and somehow everyone agreed with these norms of international law, that's the essence of the existence of the world after the war period. i mean the period after the second world war that

everyone agreed with the borders that formed on the moment of the end of the war, although maybe not everyone liked them, these are the borders. i would say that not everyone likes them, everyone has some questions about these borders, but they agreed that if we continue to ask these questions, then we will never stop fighting. russia destroyed this system, in fact, we started a new round. well, let's hope that now vladimir putin explains that this is not possible, but this is a hope. when we talked about the fall of a russian missile on the territory of poland. and then somehow everything was careful. and let's talk. we need to hold consultations and so on. that is, we just want to understand that nato is a large military-political alliance and there are many participants in this group and how prompt the response to the nato armed forces in europe will be. for this, we do not need just consultations when a rocket falls. we

perfectly understand that nato absolutely does not want a conflict with the russian federation. this is absolutely logical because the conflict with the russian federation, as i have already said, may be pregnant with the third world war, it may be connected with the exchange of nuclear strikes, a large number of european places, e.e., as well as techno, no one in europe wants this, so they will do everything possible so that there is no war with the north atlantic alliance in russia, and in the north-ethical union, because it is to do everything possible so that there is no war and from russia, but the fall of the rocket is exactly the incident that needs to be investigated, although you remember that the polish military did not even want to no one has a real russian constitution we need a war with russia. everyone understands that the war in ukraine must take place on the territory of ukraine. we are also aware of this until russia uses nuclear weapons here. if they use them, there will be a new political situation. the military situation is also new, which we don’t know. it’s all a million assumptions , but so far there is no such thing. this is how it will look as long as it does not continue

for years 2-5 15. absolutely, that is why we also have to fight localization, just in those territories where we can deter. the russian troops will not allow the russians to increase the territory of the conflict, they will try to do it, as you understand, in the course of this war of extermination, but if the armed forces of some other country enter the territory of the nato members, it will be a completely different reaction than this, you are convinced because this is a different level of consultation, a different level of military response, and then you probably think that a country such as hungary will inhibit this type of

consultation if, uh, russian ar mia will be on the territory of poland or do you think viktor roban is crazy, he perfectly understands that if the russian army can enter the territory of poland, then the war may suddenly want to enter the territory of hungary, and no friendship with putin may not help. this is obvious to any person who knows what russia is, you know. it is one thing to profit from russian e-e energy resources, and quite another to allow the possibility of a russian soldier appearing in it after what hungary experienced in the 50s of the last century well, that's it, too. it's clear. so, no there should not be any hesitation and the russians know this very well. so i say again when putin says all this, it is most likely not a threat. and it is most likely a reminder that you can give something else if you gave the western territories, you can also give the eastern ones. if you behave yourself, you can see that russia is always trying to play this card that let's divide this ukraine along the historical borders of the last ones. i made a mistake, i did not take

russia for myself, but we will give poland to romania as romania. hungary-hungary and we will take it for ourselves only russia we need aliens. we are not some kind of bolsheviks. they are trying to kill some such with this bluff. i would say that the core of relations between ukraine and neighboring countries is to seduce the territories because they still believe that the world is as it was in the 19th century . that is why it does not affect anyone. actually, i wanted to ask if it could affect anyone. know

, unlike russia, that they are not dealing with territories where their compatriots live, you understand when putin offers poland to take lviv ivano-frankivsk over there and ternopil over there i don't know volhynia oblast what they are and volhynia is russia, it was the russian empire, that's not possible well, these three oblasts, that is, the poles know for sure that millions of ukrainians live there, and the poles who lived here in galicia, they left a long time ago in poland, there is mostly a small polish community here, the same applies to hungary. we talk a lot about how orbán defends the rights of hungarians, but don't forget what hungarians make up of this, a few percent of the population of zakarpattia oblast would prevail only the majority of the population of zakarpattia oblast are ethnic ukrainians imagine a mono-ethnic hungary with 99% of the hungarian population which suddenly gets its composition screwed up because it is clear that no one you want will ever go for it because it is simply the destruction of all obligations to the european union and nato the end of the world is just a big region for hungary is a big region for ukraine transcarpathia is a small region and

for hungary it is a big region in which live ethnic ukrainians. another interesting point from the point of view of international law in general is that this was not the territory of hungary until after the second world war, but the territory of the non-existing state of czechoslovakia, and this territory was not part of either the czech republic or slovakia. then a good question arises, and to whom, if putin wants to give zakarpattia oblast , if he thinks that he can give away ukrainian territories, when in principle to give it away, then there is literally no one from the international point of view right but again yes or then i'll tell you if putin understood this he needs to wake up and read some other book that he hasn't read and somehow understand it, you just don't seem to me to underestimate the total lack of knowledge of this

person well, by the way, many of his compatriots don't really have a lot of time left and uh, i suggest you choose one of the topics that touched your heart and mind this week . they ask to talk about the ministers information policy of culture, but look i generally think that i have that the minister of culture, information policy separately, culture separately. i think that the tone chosen in connection with the resignation of the minister of culture, information policy is of no great importance, because the minister of culture, the anatolian police, of course, is an official in the verkhovna rada, most of the parties are servants of the people, if they consider that changes are needed to replace a certain minister within the framework of this conditional coalition of theirs, then they

change him, of course we understand what this is takes place in the conditions of this state, which is built in ukraine , the decision of the president and his office, but on the other hand, the president is the leader of this party . so all this, although there is no compliance with the constitutional procedures, but there is a compliance with the political procedure, therefore, to put it mildly, the figures of ministers in the ukrainian network do not do well for me. in this this is how the political system looks like, and by and large it is important to understand the simple thing that the ukrainian budget should be directed to defense needs , as is happening now, more than 50% of our budget is now allocated to defense

needs. but she attacks so that the predator attacks due to the fact of your weakness. the predator may have emotions. he may have desires, but when he understands, he sees some topic , you don't know, the wolf, you see some kind of roe, well, it's a small creature. well, i don't know, well, the boar, well, where does he know what he's going to give him in the teeth? he determines that i really want to eat, but i also want to keep my teeth. you know, there's always a dilemma between meat and teeth, and the attack happens when it's clear that you can eat meat and keep your teeth. and when you understand that there will be no teeth

do you think that it is better to eat other meat, or you can eat strawberries and strawberries there, the food is also good and the teeth will not be damaged, and this is how you should treat predators. i am not saying that we should have spent 50% on defense until 2022, because no one would allow it to be done, of course society understood what was happening, even though the war had already happened. nevertheless, if society explained, well, in society, every time they voted for agreements with russia they elected as president the one who will necessarily agree with russia to end the war more than once, not only on the 19th 2014, it is also not necessary to exaggerate society's understanding of its situation now, but in any case, if we spent more money on the army and less on infrastructure projects, it is possible. we would have managed to finish some infrastructure projects earlier than we will finish them now after the end of the war

. one and a half or two percent is spent on culture, that's exactly 52%, which is spent on defense. it's not like 50% is spent on defense, and 10% is spent on culture. after this war, we will lose the entire humanitarian component of the museum, gallery, language policy, and so on. well, in principle, i think that after the end of vinnytsia from the year 5:10, we will become part of the russian federation peacefully, but if there is nothing to reduce it, it will continue its aggressive language policy . to continue its expansion of the russian world , it will support its church on don't worry about the ukrainian land, russia will spend money on the russification of ukraine and during this war and after this war, we cannot afford to disarm in conditions where a huge danger for us is the danger of identity when, in principle, we are dealing with a country that in soviet times was built in such a way that ukrainians stopped being ukrainian , so it's not a question of whether we need a museum of the holodomor during

the war. yes, i think we need a war museum during the war, we need to realize that we can win the war, let me win the war in the plan to liberate our entire territory from the enemy and, within the next 5-10 years after this war, lose ukrainian statehood and the ukrainian people, because in the matter of identity, our empire will win, and by the way, when they say and this can't be. well, why can't it? well, 95% of the irish, i'm sorry, speak english. they won the war of independence . by the territorial

integrity of the ilan identity lost safely and after that all cultural programs began to turn to the matter even the victory of irish nationalists in the presidential and parliamentary elections which then continued for ten years already did not help anything about it was launched as a result we have a beautiful online wonderful country many wealthy people are happy our our glorious friend i am just delighted with ireland but uh these people speak uh and english better irish writers wrote their best works in english this is part of the british cultures, just like adgan glomovny. i apologize for the fact that sometimes we don’t even distinguish between dickens and joyce, er, and i don’t know the scotsman robert burns, and there is that. well, that’s how this world looks, and i don’t really want ukrainians to end up in a world where our culture will be the culture that we are now talking about russian culture, and then it will turn out that if people here speak the language and generally consider themselves a part of our civilization and their civilization, then here and there is nothing to give up because it is the culture

of the vast majority of the population from a linguistic point of view can it be so? yes, it can be, because it has been like this for centuries and we have only now begun to climb out of this cesspool of the russian world, and when they say that we must realize what we are fighting for, they always say what it is, what we must clearly understand that we are not just fighting for territory

. civilization usually disappeared from history as if they never existed. of course, no one mentions these nations because they became part of the nations in which they won, and for us now it is very important that in this criticism, uh, there are any governmental events, the resignation of the next official or not at all. in the current conditions, you did not throw the baby out with the bathwater . of course, this is what i am talking about ukrainian culture, and where exactly about ukrainian lack of culture which broke through, you know, like an abscess in the 20s of the 21st century and became the mainstream for a large number of our compatriots, it is still a huge problem that oligarchic television, the oligarchic state, the oligarchic influence tried to make ukrainians see that ukrainians are already ceasing to be russified, and the last stronghold of the empires that it did not surrender, in which it sits and in which it is going to win in any case, became ukrainian culturelessness and here is

the main thing that the state should do by financing ukrainian culture, not to finance ukrainian culture uncultured, because everything that the ukrainian oligarchic channels did, from absolutely talentless humor to absolutely talentless tv series, is such a civilizational shame, it was the strengthening of ukrainian culturelessness, and it was direct and absolutely i would say the logical path to the great war with russia, because it was the weakening of everything and it started when the pro-russian forces here, led by yanukovych , were in power, weakening everything and weakening, first of all , the state. therefore, it is really

quite serious for me touches on what i think that ukrainians are in this war, which can continue for a very long time, will bring a lot more trials, die of disappointment only at the very beginning of the fall, you can't even imagine what will happen tomorrow, i won't tell you because i have 30 seconds left, so that we don't lose ourselves, so that ukrainians don't lose themselves, because we are here fighting for ukraine, all of us who are at the front, first of all, we help them here, and the people who are at the front are fighting for ukraine, and ukraine is the heart that must continue to beat on this, we we end ours with a cross program thank you and i only have to give the floor to my colleague iryna koval who will now introduce you to the final issue of the news iryna please we have already spent a little time but we are waiting for you good evening congratulations really do not miss the next 30 minutes because they will be about the most important events of this week in such directions the armed forces of ukraine are having success and what we lack for a full counter offensive what decision was reached at the un regarding the grain agreement and why the russians ride