[000:00:00;00] we can say that he did not feed his tas - he tweeted it would be an absolutely correct description of the situation ukrainian agrarians are saving the world from a new well, but now we will see on the other side of the barricade another person who is interested in this book, this is vladimir putin, in principle, you saw that russia did not want to negotiate about this water zone, but it was forced to go to it for two reasons , the first reason was related to its special relationship with turkey, because at that time turkey was turning into such a quiet gava for

the russian oligarchy, i remember roman abramovich at the negotiations in istanbul so that he would meet with aldogan himself. well, this also shows a lot, and roman abramovich may be one of vladimir putin's wallets, for sure, in a big way, this is money. the second point is the global south itself. putin was aware that the countries of the global rooster could consider him responsible for what is not happening where, uh, uh, product nominations, prices are rising, but russia started talking about withdrawing from the agreement just a few weeks after its it was achieved why it did not work out again, really thanking rodogan and not even erdogan, i will tell you christina and his choice of president, russia was interested in the fact that bardakan won because she believed that any other winner before the presidential elections of turkey would be closer to the united states than erdogan, after cardigan won it was obvious that the agreement would not be extended by the way, even before the elections, they said that this was most likely the last moment for erdogan, by and large, just

speculating about the elections when he talks is with putin to things he says. what do you want to frame me? it looks like this, and russia continued for three months. then for another three months, it did not even continue to work out the way we were talking. now, what we see in putin is the situation when he understands that the war continues for a long time and that he needs to reduce the support of ukraine.

to organize a migration crisis, in order to organize a migration crisis, it is necessary for a global rooster to start a famine, in order for a global rooster to start a famine, it is necessary to raise the price of grain, while putin himself is going to look absolutely noble. he is going to provide grain to the poorest countries in africa for free, that is, he will not even take money for it, despite the fact that it can be done now . up to two and a half percent of all this grain according to the grain agreement is two and a half percent, but the countries of europe and the people's republic of china will have to buy grain on other markets at a more expensive price, and this means that the price of products in all the poorest countries will also increase in any case, so it will be possible to convince some sections of the population that they did not die of hunger, but relatively speaking, today this rejection of the agreement was condemned by egypt, putin is no longer going

to help egypt that grain egypt can buy grain at higher prices, people in egypt simply cannot buy it at the price that can be offered by the market. and the state has no way to subsidize it. and this is the case in many countries. that is, it will turn around like a domino, you know. it falls. putin wants it to fall, only that he is responsible for it. the only possibility for him is to return to the new year when he saw that he is considered the only culprit . what will happen at the russia africa summit, what will happen

if putin decides to talk to grain farmers? if he will be presented with direct claims, he can start to think, but it is obvious that at the moment he does not just want to think, he wants to destroy the infrastructure itself, that is , conditional, they say, he foresees a situation in which the countries of the global rooster will force him to return to the grain agreement. fuses so that the grain was supplied in the quantity in which it was supplied in the first periods of its existence, it was no longer supplied in this way, in principle, he is almost now acting completely competently. he is waiting for the countries of the global south, for their leaders, for claims . he

thinks that he may have to. by this method, odesa should already be i i think he will say well, i am, well, i will go to the meeting, not ukraine. no, it is never violence. but in africa, because i want to save africa. i understand that it is not possible to save africa just like that at the expense of our charitable contributions. well, at this moment there will be a question: ukraine can accept all these huge ships, yes, well, everything that can be destroyed, he will try to destroy . i don't care related to what we have just discussed, and in fact, many people have questions about why was mr. prystaik dismissed from the position of ambassador of ukraine to great britain and northern ireland? we are also talking about another related position. the fact is that he was a permanent representative of ukraine to an international intergovernmental organization that is a specialized

agency of the united nations. the international maritime organization . them moments in commercial civil shipping and this is now on the agenda. and an absolutely clear rule of any civil service is that a civil servant who is appointed to his position by the president of a certain state does not publicly criticize the head of state until the moment of his dismissal from civil service. if a civil servant publicly criticizes the head of state or state institutions, he should be dismissed from his position. by the way, it

is more professional to resign from his position before the moment of his speech. critics, if a civil servant realizes that he is not on the right track with the state or with the civil service, he can make a statement that will lead to his resignation. this has also happened repeatedly in the history of the civil service of any state. there is nothing to discuss here. the civilized world looks like this at the expense of alternatives . well, the country is important . the question that we have with personnel in this field, many people doubt that it will be possible to find specialists, this is a problem of any civil service in ukraine, it has been observed since the beginning of the ring of the 80s, the beginning of the 90s of the last century, of course, eh, in our time, it has only intensified, eh, there is one more point that i would definitely like to talk about . 000 wagnerians

are on the territory of belarus and this information from the state border guard service of ukraine has been confirmed, it is coming even there, it is going to do some business already in belarus. well, some of the analysts believe that there is a threat of the wagnerian forces advancing, perhaps in the bixuar corridor, that is, in kolingrad . to

serious losses in e-e russian statehood as such, we remain in this position all the more, we understand very well if you see that ukraine is fighting with transferred western equipment and not at all the most modern and with removed some microcircuits and something else, and this is already causing the russians to panic, then the question arises, what are some wagnerians going to do? they all gave up all their heavy weapons when they went to belarus and went there barefoot. why are they going to fight with the polish army or there with the army of other member countries? nato that are on the territory of poland or can to be the result of an attack on poland if we believe that this axiom does not work. because that is what certain analysts want. and that russia is ready for war with nato. the question may arise. why do you stop at nato? well, that's fine. we are at war with russia, then russia will fight with poland, latvia, lithuania, and some other countries that we all don't know about our military analysts or not. so it's all a delusion . we either live in a world where russia does not want

a nuclear conflict, and then in this world we have there is some hope that when this war will end, i don't know when it will be 20-30 years of this century, but when it ends, someday there will be security. someday we will become a normal, peaceful country, or we are just a pearl of war during the second world war, then the first swallow was poland, and then you know, france, belgium, the netherlands, norway. who didn't remember that there was already here in poland? no, we are the reich, but the german troops who did concentration camps there, and in švec, well. who was interested in that

at the time when the battles on the kursk arc were already underway, well was it the death of poland or do we agree with the fact that nato precisely because it is a block with nuclear weapons is a clear barrier on the way to the possible ambitions of the russian political leadership, what does putin say at the same time, he read another history book and he liked it, this is always the problem of people who have never read in their old age start reading books and make some discoveries for themselves, then this is not of any importance, you understand, because what does it mean that stalin gave poland the western lands of germany, after all, to the east and this germany, i apologize. this is german land, not russian. russia can't give it back to germany. germany probably won't take it. it's all delusional. i'm not saying that i don't know. do you realize that before the war, poland was still more territory than after the war, but its territory included the territory that is now the western territories of ukraine, somehow everyone agreed with these norms of international law , and that's the essence of the existence of the world after

the war period. i mean the period after of the second world war, that everyone agreed with the borders that were established at the end of the war, although maybe not everyone liked these borders. i would say that not everyone does not like them, everyone has some questions about these borders, but agreed that if we continue to ask these questions, then we will never stop fighting. i just remember a little bit of the fall, it seems. last year, when we talked about the fall of a russian missile on the territory of poland. and then somehow everything was careful. let's talk. we need to hold consultations and so on. that is, we just want to understand that nato is a large military-political alliance and there are many participants in this group and how prompt the response to the e-e of the nato armed forces in europe will be. this does not require just

a consultation when a missile falls. we understand very well that nato absolutely does not want a conflict. with the russian federation this is absolutely logical because the conflict with the russian federation, as i have already said, may be pregnant with the third world war, may be related to the exchange of nuclear strikes, a large number of european places, e.e., as well as techno, no one in europe wants this, therefore, they will do everything possible so that there is no war with the north atlantic alliance in russia, and in the north-ethical union, because it is to do everything possible so that there is no war and from russia, but the fall of the missile is exactly the incident that needs to be investigated wat though do you remember if the polish military didn't even want to talk about the real russian, for example, nobody needs a war with russia. everyone understands that the war in ukraine must take place on the territory of ukraine. we also have this awareness until the moment when russia does not use nuclear weapons here. if they use them, there will be a new political situation. the military situation was also new, which we do not know. this is all a million assumptions , but so far

this is not the case. with localization is simply on those territories where we can restrain the russian troops and prevent the russians from expanding the territory of the conflict, they will try to do it, as you understand, in the course of this war of extermination, but if the armed forces of some other country enter the territory of a nato member country, it will be a completely different reaction than that, you are convinced, because this is a different level of consultation, a different level of military response, and then you probably think that

a country like hungary will be e- to slow down this type of consultation, if the russian army will be on the territory of poland, do you think that victor roban is crazy, he perfectly understands that the russian army can enter the territory of poland, then the war may suddenly want to enter the territory of hungary, and no friendship with putin may not help. this is obvious to any person who knows what russia is, you know . the pot survived in the 50s of the last century, well, that’s it too. it’s clear that there should be no hesitation, and the russians know this very well. so i say again, when putin says all this, it is most likely not a threat. and this is most likely a reminder that you can give something else, if you gave a gift to the western territories, you can also give the eastern ones. if you behave well, you see that russia is always trying to play this card that let’s divide this ukraine along the historical borders of the real ones

, the last ones made a mistake didn't quite take it russia, but we will give poland to poland, romania, romania, hungary-hungary, and we will take only russia for ourselves. we need aliens. we are not some kind of bolsheviks. they are trying to kill some such people with this bluff. i would say that the core of the relationship between ukraine and neighboring countries is to seduce territories because they still believe that the world is as it was in the 19th century, that you can play like that and that is why it does not work for anyone. at least it can affect someone like that no, it

can't affect anyone because of that simple reasons that all our neighbors know, unlike russia, that they do not deal with the territories where their compatriots live, you understand when putin offers poland to take lviv ivano-frankivsk there ternopil i don't know volhynia oblast what they and volhynia is russia, it was the russian empire, that's not possible well, these three oblasts, that is, the poles know for sure that there are millions of ukrainians living there, and the poles who lived here in galicia, they left long ago in poland , mostly here is small for the polish community , the same applies to hungary. we are many we talk about how orbán protects the rights of hungarians, but don't forget that hungarians make up a few percent of the population of zakarpattia oblast, the majority of the population of zakarpattia oblast are ethnic ukrainians. imagine a mono-ethnic hungary with 99% of the hungarian population, which suddenly gets its composition screwed up

. for ukraine transcarpathia is a small region, but for hungary it is a large region in which ethnic ukrainians live. another interesting point from the point of view of international law in general is that it was not the territory of hungary until after the second world war, but the territory of the non-existing state of czechoslovakia, and this territory was not part of either the czech republic or slovakia, then a good question arises, and to whom if putin wants to give the transcarpathian region if he thinks that he can give away ukrainian territories, when in principle there is no one to give it to

literally from the point of view of international law, but then again, then i will tell you that if putin has understood this, he needs to wake up and read some other book that he has not read and somehow understand it, you simply do not seem to me to underestimate the total lack of knowledge of this person. and by the way, many of his compatriots do not really have much time left, and i suggest you choose one of the topics that touched your heart and mind this week. in the chat between others are asked to talk about the ministers of information policy and culture, but look. in general, i believe that i have that the minister of culture, information policy separately, culture separately. i believe that the tone chosen in connection with the resignation of the minister of culture, information policy is of no great importance , because the minister of culture, the anatolian police, of course, is an official in the verkhovna rada, the majority of parties are servants of the people, if they think it is necessary to change within the framework of this conditional coalition

of some minister, then they change him of course, we understand that this is happening in the conditions of this state, which was built in ukraine, the decision of the president and his office, but on the other hand, the president is the leader of this party. so all this, although there is no compliance with the constitutional procedures, but the political procedure is in accordance with that, the figures of ministers in the ukrainian network, to put it mildly, i don't care much, i don't even remember who is there in recent years, these people are not players. you cannot blame them personally for this. this is what the political system looks like, and by and large it is important to understand the simple thing that the ukrainian budget should be directed to defense needs, as is happening now, more than 50% of our budget is now allocated to defense

needs. emotions, but she attacks so that a predator attacks you because of your weakness. a predator can have emotions. a predator can have emotions. he can have desires, but when he understands, he sees a topic. you don't know a wolf. you see some kind of roe deer. well, it's a small creature. well, i don't know. well, a boar. you know what he will give him in the teeth. he determines that i really want to eat, but i also want to keep my teeth. you know, there is always a dilemma between meat and teeth, and the attack occurs when it is clear that you can eat meat and keep your teeth. and when you understand that there will be no teeth do you think that it is better to eat other meat, or you can eat strawberries and strawberries there, the food is also good and your teeth will not be damaged, and this is how you should treat predators. i am not saying that we should have spent 50% on defense until 2022, because no one allowed it to be done, of course society understood what was happening even though

the war had already happened. nevertheless, if society explained, well, in society, every time they voted for agreements with russia about he was the president of the one who will definitely agree with russia , he will stop it more than once, not only for 19 years on the 14th, it is also not necessary to exaggerate society's understanding of its situation now, but in any case, if we spent more money on the army and less on infrastructure projects, it is possible that we would have managed to finish some infrastructure projects earlier than we

will finish them now after the end of the war. the percentage of the budget that is spent on culture is one and a half or two percent, it is exactly 52% that is spent on defense. it is not the same as 50% on defense, and 10% on culture, if we in after this war, we will lose the entire humanitarian component of language policy, and thus, in principle, i think that after the end of the war or from the year 5:10 we will become part of the russian federation peacefully, but it will not reduce anything, it will continue its aggressive language politics, it will continue its expansion of the russian world she will support her church on ukrainian soil , don't worry russia will spend money on the russification of ukraine and during this war and after this war we cannot afford to disarm in conditions where a huge danger for us is the danger of identity when, in principle, we are dealing with a country that in soviet times was built so that ukrainians would cease to be ukrainian so it is not a question of whether we need a museum of the holodomor during the war yes, i think we need a war museum during

the war we need to realize do what we can win the war let's win the war in order to liberate our entire territory from the enemy and within the next five to 10 years after this war to lose ukrainian statehood and the ukrainian people because in the matter of identity our empire will win and by the way when they say and this can't be well why can't it can't well 95% of the irish i'm sorry speak english they won the war of independence they won beautifully then there was a civil war in which the people who were in favor by the territorial

integrity of the ilan identity even the victory of the irish nationalists in the presidential and parliamentary elections, which was continued for ten years, did not help anything, as a result, we have a beautiful ireland , a wonderful country, many wealthy people, happy, our, our glorious friend, i am just delighted with ireland, but these people speak english better, irish writers wrote their best works in english, this is a part of british culture, just like adgan glomovny , i apologize to the culture and sometimes we even no we distinguish between dickens and joyce eh and don’t i know the scotsman robert burns and there is that well, this is how this world looks and i don’t really want ukrainians to find themselves in a world where our culture will be the culture that we are now like to consult russian culture and then it will turn out that if people here speak the language and generally consider themselves part of our civilization and their civilization, then there is nothing to give up because this is the culture of the majority of the population from the linguistic

point of view will be yes, it can be because it has been like this for centuries and we have only now begun to climb out of this cesspool of the russian world, and when they say that we must realize what we are fighting for, they always say what it is. what we must clearly understand is that we are not just fighting for territory

. as if they had never been nobody of course, he does not mention these nations because they became part of the nations in which they won, and for us now it is very important that in this criticism, uh, there are any governmental events, the resignation of an official on duty or not at all. in the current conditions, you did not throw the baby out with the bathwater. you realized that we need really ambitious cultural projects, not serials . it burst, you know, like an abscess in the 20s years of the 21st century and became the mainstream for a large number of our compatriots, it is still a huge problem that oligarchic television, the oligarchic state, the oligarchic influence tried to make ukrainians see that ukrainians are already ceasing to be russified and the last payment of the empires that she did not pay, in which she is sitting and in which she is going to win in any

case, ukrainian culturelessness has become, and here is the main thing that the state should do by financing ukrainian culture, not to finance ukrainian culturelessness that's all what did the ukrainian oligarchic channels do from absolutely talentless humor to absolutely talentless tv series, this is such a civilizational shame, it was the strengthening of ukrainian lack of culture and it was direct and absolutely i would say the logical path to the great war with russia because it was the weakening of everything and it started when the pro-russian forces here, led by yanukovych, were in power weakening everything and weakening, first of all, the state . that i believe that ukrainians are in this

war, which can continue for a very long time bring a lot more trials, die of disappointments only at the very beginning of the fall, you can't even imagine what will happen tomorrow, i won't tell you because i have 30 seconds left, so that we don't lose ourselves so that ukrainians don't lose themselves because we are all here fighting for ukraine who is on the front, first of all, we are here to help them, and the people who are on the front are fighting for ukraine, and ukraine is the heart that must continue to beat on this, we end our program with a cross . congratulations to all who are for es press time to find out about important events, and this issue begins with this russians bombed the palace of culture with cluster munitions in the time gap in