[000:00:00;00] it is in order for this transformer to end up in ukraine, of course, that is, we are repeating your same phrase again about the fact that there is no transformer supermarket where you can come and choose at any time, you need one more topic sergey, we want to discuss with you russian ships and planes to be assigned to the black sea fleet practicing the skills of blocking and destroying ships this was reported by the military media center under the ministry of defense of ukraine, the experts of the center note that in this way, after withdrawing from the grain agreement, the occupiers are preparing to attack civilian ships in the black sea, and both ukrainian and foreign ones that leave ukraine or move to their age. hunger games from the kremlin due to the blockade of the black sea initiative, world grain prices may increase by 15%, such a forecast was announced by the imf, there they noted that the impossibility of ukraine to export their grains will significantly affect the food security of north africa, the middle east and south asia , the regions most dependent on ukrainian grain. i will remind you that on july 17, putin

announced his withdrawal from the grain agreement that was in effect a year since then, it has been attacking the south of ukraine almost every night and destroying the port infrastructure in a series. if we talk about grain, when you talk to veteran entrepreneurs, they say that we suffer from the fact that those people who stayed to run their businesses are now in a more favorable position, they are dumping us, they are dragging customers onto themselves while we are at war here, the story of russia, which is ready to give free grain to the whole world, and instead of ukrainian, this is a story if in monetary terms it is also about dumping, or is it about the desire to redraw the map of grain exporters in the world, of course, the desire, first of all, is to redo the structure , to change the structure of exports in their favor, it is here, if there was no secret, they did it , they do it frankly, it will not be possible

, ukraine will not be able to replace it because that the volumes of grain produced by ukraine. well, how and which ukraine supplied for export ? it is not so easy to somehow find somewhere to take and provide. % than last year it will be about 46 million t for cereals, again in 2021 it was significantly higher than 80 million ago, i.e. 46 over 80, the difference is noticeable, but the domestic consumption of ukraine is about 18 million t, i.e. even if it is 46 now, it will be of grain 46 e-e that is, it turns out yes, that is, we have enough export volumes measured there by tens of millions of tons e and e these are serious indicators russia can not simply turn to

that way well, materialize somewhere there and again last year they had e was most of the occupied kherson oblast, this grain was ready, this grain was stored in significant quantities since the 21st year, that is, it had not yet been exported. now, in such a situation, such a resource that they could simply steal and appropriate and withdraw from them will not be , well, in such a situation volumes, it won't be clear that they are trying, uh, they put forward such initiatives, we don't tempt uh, other countries with what we will give you, almost for free well, to be honest, i don't believe in such altruism of russia as supplying to someone somewhere the same about the same amount of grain that at one time witnessed ukraine more than that. it is important not only that you can buy in one day , the stability of supplies is also important, that is, if today you refuse from one supplier in favor of another, and tomorrow this

the supplier has stopped fulfilling its obligations, you will not receive that volume either way. this market is quite er serious, that is, it is not so, well, it is designed for such situational er circumstances when it is possible . suddenly, something somewhere there somewhere free of charge to get all the more, again, i don't believe in free grain from russia , i don't really believe. well, there is probably some free cheese here, but i would like to understand the logic of what russia is now trying to achieve by destroying the port infrastructure . it is obvious for so that we cannot export by sea, because at first they tried to close the routes, and now it is simply not even possible to send these ships , but i do not fully understand the logic of our western partners, how they are going to help us resist this because the first meeting of the ukraine nato council has already taken place. well, the institute has announced that they will monitor

the situation in the black sea more closely, but what does this give us , that is, in what way are they going to preserve the grain corridor ? i-e scenario according to which the grain corridor was protected due to the use of military military overlap , that is, let's say there is a convoy going there , except at 4 p.m. maybe well, the problem here is not even to cover something from the air, because if, for example, the path along which grain carriers move is mined and russia has already done it, it did it at the beginning of a full-scale invasion, mine-protected approaches to ports are mined very risky, that is, the ship is moving

no, no plane will save him from a variable collision. unfortunately, this is how it can be cleared, but it is possible to clear these paths with mortars. to provide the military with military force, this corridor is what we can count on . countries baltic countries we do not border with them therefore, it is as if well but but there are ports, that is, in fact, so far this direction , well, it is such a tit in the hands of uh, on which it is better to count now than on a crane in the sky in the form of a change, that is, that it is not russia that will press for example, turkey - this is potentially possible, and when, let's say, the situation in the black sea becomes so complicated that

turkey will say no , enough of these military threats. will it go to us related to this e-e efforts and there are any expenses, i.e. will it be ready to intervene in this situation and what is the maximum throughput ? it seems that up to 5 million tons per month could be washed more than 30. well, these were the data, these were the data on the eve of the termination of the agreement, that is, when this deadline for its suspension was approaching, it was june 16, 17, as i recall, he called the number exported along the grain corridor about 30

million tons, this is their data. and what about that, well, we just have pillows now, the indicators for grain exports are about the forecast of grain exports. well, there are still oilseeds , of course. there will be somewhere around 46 million tons. we need to take out 26 of us, after all, this is a shortage of those, i think that the power in general should be enough, that is, through the danube corridor and through the railway . according to the idea, the situation should not be so acute, but how much can we take out the power that we did not destroy in honor of the russians, it is the same, it is countless, it seems that the amount of fire is how many months we need it, it is clear that this is not the optimal route, it is clear that this is , again, the situation is extreme, but the situation during the year was developed , opened to such a transition, and created opportunities for more optimal overloading

that is, the situation there, too, again, it is impossible, it is impossible, if you paint some important illusions, say that we will export everything by rail and through the danube, what we did not import into the black sea, it will be much more expensive, it will be much more difficult, it will be slower, this is a fact, but if there is no exit this market of unhappiness is dynamic , it is being rebuilt quickly, and in a situation where demand and supply arise and certain corridors are closed, other alternative opportunities arise, they are developing quite actively, and i think that even if there is not, at least this is our main hope now because, let's say, defeat russia in the black sea, you can defeat them, even conditionally speaking, defeat them there, destroy all the ships, but how to destroy all the mines that they may be able to er, that is, again, it will be time for demining, these are threats they are so fast and not all ship owners will want to risk passing under these conditions, we had cases of e.e.

attacks on ships moving through the black sea last spring last summer when they were also attacked in the ports. that is, it is not some abstract threat, it is what can them had to deal with if now russia says that we will move, we will assume that these are military goals and refer to the norms of maritime law that they interpret very, very flexibly and very much so if they interpret freely, well, not everyone will want to we can risk these conditions . we can continue further and in particular talk about weapons . the united states will have enough weapons to help ukraine and for its own army. the package of defense support for ukraine is compiled collegially, taking into account the readiness of the united states and what can be transferred. i will remind you that the pentagon announced new aid to ukraine for $ 400 million. ukraine

will receive 23 armored personnel carriers, strikers , as well as additional ammunition for patriot systems on samsung and heimers. the united states in general do not support strikes deep into russian territory, but realize that it was russia that started the war and is responsible for it, this is how white house press secretary karin jean pierre answered a journalist's question about washington's attitude towards that with drones over moscow russia started this war and it can stop it even today and we will provide security assistance to ukraine as we have been doing for 15 months because they are fighting for their freedom and sovereignty - this is our obligation to ukraine serhiy lukyanchuk remains an analyst in our studio. i remind you that we are working for you live on the air about uh-weapons directly. sergey, i recently mentioned the fact that um, immediately on that first

day last week when russia fired odesa was the commander-in-chief's bid to strengthen the defense of the ports. we just talked with you about the grain, how can we strengthen the defense if we do not receive additional types of weapons, or here is a new package and there will be a certain remodulation, a certain hope and a certain strengthening of the defense of the ports in particular . that is, we depend exclusively here from the number of weapons from the number of new weapons , yes, this is, again, an obvious fact, it is clear that the effectiveness of the weapons that we have, er , means of defense depends, again, on two of the two components, the first is how many we have the means that can launch rockets are capable of shooting down russian missiles, and the second is how much ammunition we have. how many missiles do we have so that we can not be afraid . what, for example, there was a mass launch, we worked on it, and the next day there are no more how to shoot down these rockets so far, the bid er if these tasks are determined and these

tasks, well, at least our partners support us in the sense that again if we look at the next package for 400 million er dollars we will see there and missiles for the patriot and we will see the denisance missiles there, but you know sergey, uh, yuri ignat called the third aspect to our broadcast the destruction of the launchers, we say this both in the context of the shaheds and in the context of the launch of all missiles of all types, the package that the russians launch at us and were here would be useful to us and attacks with including no any court no doubts at all in order to understand what we need it is worth a little if you look back, do you remember how the radar reconnaissance plane took off from belarus and how every time there were uh, air alarms 50, and then something else happened to this plane, and well, it doesn’t take off from belarus anymore, but somewhere it is already somewhere in russia , it is being repaired, this is related to the question of how

effective the strikes are on uh, because it is located on their territory, it is considered that again the story itself was, do you remember now , the fractions of e-weapons or directly about approaches to the use of weapons and approaches to waging war because they prohibit, well, that is, this is true even if you look at the breaching of the defense line that the russians built during that period while we were waiting for heavy armor now , it would be easier to bypass it, let's say from the territory of the russian federation. literally no one wants a nuclear conflict, russia has made it clear that in the event of an attack on its territory, what they consider to be an attack on its territory, it will consider as a means of protecting the use of nuclear weapons

. let's then try to figure out where this is the border of its territory, because russia already considers the south of ukraine to be its territory, so they even made certain legislative changes in the country, but our allies are fighting there, again, if we are, because you just quoted the press secretary the white house in her speech also had a phrase about the fact that uh, we understand that we do not approve , there was a continuation of this phrase, we do not approve of attacks on the territory deep into russia, but we understand that crimea is the territory of ukraine , that is, in this sense, they are doing delimitation what is the legal internationally recognized territory of ukraine, here they have no claims to ukraine using any weapon that it has for the impression of goals i am talking about something else i am talking about what if we try to follow the logic of the russians that is well, their territory is already out, what is the difference, let's say, between belgorod or

, well, rostov is far away , okay? well, there are regions that will help us bypass it. well, mostly , it will be belgorod, a certain area that we can enter , all the lines that they have built for defense, and calmly just go deep. and not cut through them, don't go through the mini fields, which too. even our western partners admit that they are slowing down our offensive. i wouldn't do it. i can't assess the effectiveness of this kind of offensive operations through the territory of russia to liberate the territory of ukraine. i can't say how much they were. are they realistic or capable of carrying them out in the western partners clearly, well, they clearly say, uh, liberate, uh, uh, we don’t want you to fire on the territory of russia, because it is again possible in a direct text in such and

such a form, which is how i will say it now it is not is voiced but in principle it is very clear if it is emphasized in the sense of the content we do not want to risk a nuclear conflict accordingly we do not want to give you the means so that you can risk a nuclear conflict as much as they are willing to give russia to break up ukraine, and again i do not want to be an advocate of such a position , it is my personal opinion, it is not that it is my personal opinion , i cannot say that i approve of it. must also remember how changed as the west's approach to arming ukraine changed and when we will say when we were told and you will never get petri , germany, which is currently providing ukraine with one of the most powerful aid with armored vehicles, talked about what in general, what kind of dirty equipment we have

a policy not not in our long-term many for decades, politics does not allow us to arm, to send arms exports to countries that are at war, these were official statements, because it is not difficult to recall them, now the situation has changed radically, and therefore there is hope that the approach to long-range weapons, i still think that the issue with aircraft has already been resolved , that there are rather technical difficulties than i think. i think that the trump card in the form of long-range missiles will also be put on the table at the moment when , say, the united states will consider it necessary just as it happened with the petriv missiles. but at the same time, he writes that we need to strengthen the missile defense system not only with systems capable of hitting ballistic targets, but also with short-range systems, and in particular, a whole material in them is devoted to the fact that short-range artillery systems are just what we need actions of i

they could fill that gap regarding the missing attacks and uh, other means here you can simply approach this question in a different way and ask and what air defense systems do we not need, which ones would we say so and you find that we need all of them and therefore say and therefore, accordingly, if everything what everything what they can give us is everything we need everything everything will find its use in us eh on the air with vadim and the teacher of nierov university said but there is also the question of the possibility of development and bandwidth, that is, if, for example, we are given now all the necessary number of cheetahs if we are talking about anti-aircraft artillery systems that can fill those programs vppo give turkish korkut give skynyx that is people also they need training and people are also a certain number and we are talking about what is

currently on the battlefield in our country we do not we can say that there is a change to each other and the ukrainians have shown that they are able to very quickly and effectively master the best samples of western weapons , first of all, these weapons are made correctly by the right hands with the right brains for the right tasks, that is, in this sense, it is not possible to say that a person who knows how to work with the s300 complex, and suddenly a person, well, it will be very difficult for him, how do we create the same nations or petriv yes these are other other tasks other other level but in principle it is not uh the task is too big it is not there let's say there afghanistan it is already it the ukrainian military has already proved serhiy says that about the nuclear threat from russia it is worth mentioning the zaporizhia

nuclear power plant and there here's another one the threat that ukraine is trying to fight and here is the way ukraine is doing everything to convey what is happening to the world community the risks of the occupiers violating safety rules at the zaporizhzhia npp , the minister of environmental protection and natural resources ruslan strelets told about this on the air of the tomarathon, everything is done on the example of the chernobyl npp disaster but currently the minister emphasized that the controlled situation at this facility is likely to violate absolutely all possible rules for dealing with such dangerous objects, secondly, and the information with which we operate, which is provided by energoatom, it is open enough that today the situation is under control, indeed today such weather conditions occur when water evaporates from the cooler pond , but this level there is not critical, the situation is under the control of energoatom serhii, if the west's fears that russia

will use tactical or strategic nuclear weapons are understandable and they are going for deterrence, then the potential threat from the zaporizhzhia npp is certainly no less if the russians will resort to such actions and why is the west not so categorical in this regard, because it is on ukrainian territory and it contradicts all international norms, well, the problem is that the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is occupied and the west and can the west help in landing it where exactly it would be good, but well and such a rich person simply takes a lot under his control and everything is demilitarized in the area within a radius of i don’t know 10-20 kilometers, the mother can’t, that is , the station is mined by the enemy, the station is mined , there are military units at the station, as

it became known, the mother spoke again ukrainian leaders of the ukrainian energy industry and they are not allowed to go wherever they want, but the un unit is trying. but again, well, with such success, it would be good if, as during the korean war , the un decision would introduce un troops and well, there would be, let's say, a full-fledged military intervention in the u.s. taming of the aggressor would be good. well, it is not happening . yes, in relation to the zaporizhzhia npp, in fact, the risks are really very high. they are the fourth reactor as they promised as what- what which they claimed were transferred to eh in the burning mode of the so-called hot shutdown, that is, in the event of eh problems with cooling , this reactor turns into a potential problem, which means a much higher risk of eh

melting of the active zone in the event that it is stopped cooling, they are not maximum, they are not as high as, say, if this reactor was working normally, but they are much higher than if it was in the state when it was previously in a state of cold shutdown and again it is not clear. it to do now well, i don’t know. probably there is nothing, but they did it accordingly, they want, uh , i don’t think that this is also one of the levers of pressure, it is very much included in their logic of actions in general, where escalation is due to escalation, so raise the rates in order to later get your serhiy thank you for this night energy, which turned into morning already. serhiy lukanchuk, the analyst, was with us live on the air without going to the equator, and therefore the tourist season

is gaining momentum. mainly women with children go on trips, but there are a lot of willing ones, which is why there are long queues at the checkpoints, what is the current situation on the border with romania, where is the route to the popular resorts of bulgaria and greece, ivan siretskyi found out , the summer vacation season is in full swing and since health on black the sea in ukraine is dangerous, many people go to european resorts, their routes are mainly laid through the porubne checkpoint on the border with romania, in the summer there is a traditional increase in passenger traffic, for example, from june until august last year, more than 800,000 people applied for departure from ukraine. this year, as we can also see the queues of cars, it takes a long time to enter the territory of the checkpoint, but it is not necessary to talk about the fact that it does not move at all. they came right

under the border and stopped by, but today is a holiday , i guess today the queue is normal , it's crowded, it's tolerable, it's not long, it's not long , if there are a lot of buses, you can wait for a couple of hours. well, it's a little difficult especially if you have a child, it’s a bit complicated, but nothing, but now there is no queue for the bus with tourists, thanks to the work of the border guards, who will offer the capacity of 80 buses per day. more than a hundred are issued every day . regarding where ukrainians are going , bulgaria is the undisputed favorite for travel . we are going to bulgaria for a vacation in our grandmother is there with another child . we are going to rest and visit them. we are leaving kyiv and heading to bulgaria for my daughter's artistic gymnastics training. i am coming from lviv and we are going to bulgaria for the first time in a year.

on this side, i have set myself up for the fact that i will quickly cross the border with the children, the highest load at the checkpoint is at lunchtime, therefore the border guards advise drivers to calculate their route so as to arrive at the logging site in the morning or in the evening. and they also emphasize that half a hundred kilometers from here there is another checkpoint, krasnoilsk, where the flow of traffic is many times smaller, it is also designed to be able to process both passenger cars and passenger buses, the average figures for the passage of large buses through porubne e there are up to 100 buses per day, while in krasnoilsk there may be 10, or even less, the peak of the summer vacation season is still ahead, therefore the border officials call on ukrainians to be responsible when planning their travel routes so that they do not have to stand in long lines in mykolaiv, they published a comic for teenagers whose parents have just returned from the war , military personnel

, psychologists and well-known artists of ukraine worked on its development. who in a winning way from the pages of the book tells children about how to properly behave with their father, who after the war finds it difficult to adapt to civilian life, a psychologist designed the book in such a way that when picking it up, children do not feel and do not experience trauma, they created a comic based on the book that he wrote 5 years ago now a military serviceman, then still a member of the ato oos and la shpolyansky, who himself is the father of three children , it was relevant for me when i returned , my youngest daughter was two years old and my eldest daughter was 10 years old, my son was then 6 years old and of course, it was very relevant for me at that time, because certain stories described in these comics came by chance, as if from my life, although the author of the comic is the count suffix party. you gave a comic with a circulation of one and a half thousand copies at the expense of the ukrainian veterans' fund. families

of employees from all over ukraine can receive them. and applications for receipt are accepted until july 30. so far , about three hundred ukrainian families of military personnel have expressed their desire to receive the comic. after reading, the children will receive gifts, after which the children will pass the so-called web quest that will help consolidate the information that they came to in the comic after successfully completing the web quest, children receive gifts in the form of roosters with the main characters of this comic ; turning the book into a comic was undertaken by the ukrainian artist oleksandr korizhkov , the man has many years of experience with hay , the work took a long time about three months after the random committee returned from the war, we took the main thesis that ilya described and called them a number of emotional events that lead

to the necessary conclusions for the customer and us and that's how they wrote the script, everyone approved it and started drawing the comic in the plans of the developers and authors of the comics. create a sequel , it will be called my mother returned from the war , because the ukrainian army now has a fairly high percentage of female servicemen. sinitsin and then we will work here in this studio until six o'clock. well, for now, you can rest. raise children with disabilities news release literally in a moment the only news together we are strong armed forces need drones make your contribution scan the qr-code congratulations ukrainians are with you marathon