[000:00:00;00] well, what will everyone do? listen, don't think that you and i are the only intelligent people who are watching this in american politics today, there in the white house, they have already understood everything. it's clear to everyone. when moravetske talks again about this security, provocations, pushovers, etc. this this this it means that everyone has already understood everything, for a long time it was like this, you know, i would say confused, what happened to the lamb, what was it at all, now it is clear what it was. when lukashenka comes to putin and speaks in front of the cameras, you also know how a person who learned her role taught so they gave me a piece of paper she studied and here the field answers i can't hold them oh no they want to go on an excursion already what am i telling them and what do you already what already what ani i'm holding them volodymyr i'm holding them hah, we agreed there, well, well, you understand, lukashenko was never a good actor, he is a good actor in his own way

, maybe i'm better than lukashenka, but unfortunately we depend not on me, but on him, and that's how it all looks when he began to speak, but to name geographical gas, then everyone becomes everything is clear. and by the way, last year it wasn’t immediately. they were also last year the presidents of poland and lithuania, because duda and some of us met at the house in the suvalkas. simply no one could understand how the russians could do something because, well, the use of the russian army from the kaliningrad region or those parts that were on the territory of belarus, now they have brought everything out and seen . this is also not accidental, this is to say to our army. what do you want from us ? was giving none and we are not there, this is a bandit, but you cannot be that the russian army directly participates in such a conflict, this is really

a project of a world war, and now everyone understands that they want to go the hybrid way, and i think that right now in the national security council of the united states and in the rating of poland's national security is being discussed. let's put it this way, this toolkit, this mechanism for responding to hybrid threats, because it is very clear that if you make a mistake, a world war. by the way, it is very reminiscent of the period before at the beginning of the second, it was all the same, but there was czechoslovakia, which said to defend itself like ukraine, and the territory of which was essentially given to hitler or berlin , the student region, and czechoslovakia itself little by little means there, well, it just wasn’t, it ’s difficult to compare the territory of ukraine with the territories of czechoslovakia and germany with russia

at that time, but one way or another, czechoslovakia had the entire military industry . it was really almost disarmed. from the point of view of obligations, you will say that there are no obligations, but then there were obligations, simply obligations to czechoslovakia were considered. so simply protect its sovereignty so that it is as it is now, many say that our main task is to protect the sovereignty of ukraine so that ukraine remains sovereign the state and how will it be there, well, it will be there somehow, and then go, entered poland, and here the real security guarantees from great britain and france have already begun to work, and the second world war began, but now, in fact, putin is following hitler's path everything as he dreamed. it seems to me that he reaches poland, tries to destabilize poland first by a hybrid way, and hitler also already tried to them that the only thing he demanded in poland

was the corridors carried by him . a territorial corridor that poland did not want to provide, and there were hybrid and various provocations in gdańsk, they had already begun, all because you had, as it were, germany, then it was famous. this story, when hitler sesarzio changed into a polish uniform, this is also very practical, and they attacked a german radio station and hitler together , then they told what a horror it is in the reg staz, well , that is, they. the only thing that is not clear is why. they think that the world does not understand this, that all are stupid

, they do not understand it is not clear, for a certain time the world said , including us in ukraine, what oh and putin dovben, he is weakened. you see, he does not control the situation and so on a huge number of mistakes behind this 18, you can say that he acted like a perfect computer there, no, but on the other hand, we understand how these mistakes happen, that putin always makes mistakes when he believes in what he wants to believe, and his environment feeds this faith. let's say how it was with er, you understand more clearly that all these people whom he trusted, medvedchuk, someone is still there, they told him that the ukrainians are just waiting for him, that as soon as he comes to kyiv, everyone will just be there with flowers and flowers to run to the tanks and by the way, this is masha now

zakharova just says that ukrainians are mad that they don't have such a president, they want someone like putin to have a library in ukraine, and it's very strange, but when they just play games that do not involve the support of the population , that's how it is now, when they rely on the support of the population, they always lose because they they always believe that they can buy everyone, that they can shut everyone's mouths either by force or money, that's why they don't believe in any popular uprisings in the maidans and others, but when it comes to purely military operations, or about purely force operations, or about otaku, or some kind of agent game, they may not make such group mistakes because this is what they were trained for, they are bad politicians, but good chekists, and now we are not talking about an operation that involves the joy of the polish people about the emergence of the wagner group, and we are simply talking about a hybrid provocation, they are capable of constructing, therefore , they are dangerous, if we are talking about it, why are you

talking about it in order to reduce the degree of this danger, because we understand it and if the poles understand it, if the poles will say this and that if wagner comes here, we will assume that this is a russian attack on poland , here is something that needs to be said well, for now there is no such thing , but if it is said that we do not believe in any wagner, that these will be russian provocations and the belarusians, and they will, we will respond , and not only the poles should say it, the white house should say it, but you are right here when you said that putin will have the answer as you noted, i do not control the answer, but he will understand the consequences and if he understands the consequences, he may not start this operation, but he will always blackmail, not like the grain deal. now you understand, blackmailing such an operation will not add anything special to anyone , because you can't

blackmail them. take over poland i want to remind you that wagner tried to take over bakhmut for 9 months and you understand that the poles give us military equipment there and so on, but their army is equipped with modern equipment, i don't think that wagner will disappear from poland in a few hours no nothing will happen that will endanger the national sovereignty of poland, it is impossible, it only makes sense, a provocation that would be planned as a russian response in the future, if the russians know that no hybrid history will work out, they will not play this game, they will simply wait for a new story, they will invent something new, they won't calm down, i'm in them. in this regard, i believe it, you know, it's like doctor evil, who walked around all the time and guessed, er, chewed and invented some new combinations in this

movie about this is a park, it's putin. by the way very similar very similar he is becoming more and more similar to this character that's all , but it's important for us to unravel every combination of putin because if we treated his behavior correctly in the 22nd year, if we didn't disorient him in the period of 2019-2022, we infected peaceful countries with all our problems that we did not evaluate and did not want to evaluate their intentions although they talked about them out loud, do you remember putin, as i said that there is no ukraine, no ukrainian people, and medvedev who said that we will not talk to president volodymyr zelenskyi because he is a nazi, er, fascists, everything in the world, we will wait for the next president of ukraine, and we perceived the conversation exclusively

as journalism, and people like putin and medvedev do not engage in journalism are engaged in preparing the public for aggression. unfortunately, we really omitted it, and even later when we were specifically warned. was building all this time, they will close the border with belarus now this will also be correct well, how to talk about it it is necessary because then, uh , adequately treat putin's new intentions , by the way, i really liked your comparison of putin with dr. evil i really guessed which one is in the portrait of dorian gray putin, the more evil he does, the more pathetic he just becomes. well, to be honest, he wasn't a handsome man. we'll never be honest, handsome man. but nevertheless, he's really disgusting. now, i think

he's been disgusting here since the first day i saw him. i'll tell you, i recognized him. and when i saw him there for the first time in 1998 or the ninth year, he was always a fire, not just anyone. nobody wanted to look at him like that. he was in these big suits, these hands, these pants, jackets, and all that looked somehow clownish, somehow a terrible type and people wanted to turn a blind eye to it. it was very strange that they turn a blind eye to how he dresses in general, how he behaves, that he is just some kind of gopnik from the back door and all these people who wrote the whole thing, i recently read peter aven's book about peter berezovsky, he is the head of one head of alfa bank and there, oh, the first thing you did was find a store in london

. to sew specially so that the suit fits like a needle, you need a suit, uh, to live individually, especially in the case of putin, who is very short , well, you understand, well, all these people understood that you need to dress properly, do you look elegant, if you are a banker or politicians, etc. and suddenly they see a garden scarecrow in front of them, of course, and they don't want to notice it, behind it there is an incredible array of gamma complexes if you dress like that, if you come to this shopping and say that you need a jacket 5 sizes bigger and pants two sizes larger smaller because they have to be short and the jacket has to be big so that you seem like such a bigot, a serious man, you go out to people, being the president of the state, you need a jacket

, it starts here, it ends here, and the trousers are here here somewhere you run out, that is, in your trousers you look like some kind of grandpa gardener and your jacket is like that of some thug and under all this there is no shoulder and no legs so that you can wear something short there and you walk like that among people and people have to pretend it's like in andersen's fairy tale that they don't see it, well, you know, the tv doesn't show it, i'll be honest, but when you actually see it, you usually start singing for the sixth time from his appearance, and now i'm thinking about these people who talked to him, and i'll tell you why he looks like that because he was not used to carrying all this he walked like all hopliks in sports suits and when they put on him yes and when they put on him something that people wear it looked funny and he still didn't understand how it all happened and i don't want to understand what we are waiting for if you are the president of russia then what do you do

i'm not going to tell you about it, you'll tell me to spit, that's also an important point, he doesn't want to hear anything he doesn't want to hear, and you can understand . let's talk about bitteryn, you already mentioned him today about his behavior in the 14th year . however, now he is being tried and navalny spoke about him saying that girkin is a political prisoner and somehow it will change like that in our country, they filed, as you know, such a sensation . navalny supported girkin, but that's strange , because navalny, in principle, is not very loyal to ukraine and so on , listen, i don't i think that the question of navalny and his assessment of the hill is generally related to who supports ukraine or not. although again, i remind you that navalny ghirkin held debates among themselves, but the question is, what is the composition of who is a political prisoner today?

i don't see any mistake here. girkin is being judged . he is a person who should be arrested under the article for which he should serve life imprisonment. to be tried and he is being tried for the actual text of the social networks about the government. yes, and with this article, they want to change it to guilt . by the way, mario is being investigated for this article for extremism. humoreg should be imprisoned for the fact that this person who actually killed people in donbas, the territorial integrity of our country has been encroached on, these are criminal crimes, and these articles for which they are being investigated in russia are political articles, people who are tried for political articles, they are political prisoners, relatively speaking you have a beautiful example without a hill for some steel there yosyp seryovych

he was in prisons on political articles, together with this populist, he robbed banks and so on, but he was condemned , as far as i remember, on articles of my own, for the seizure of land that was connected with his political activity, he does not consider it a lesser bandit, as well as more bolsheviks, not a murderer, we cannot understand that a political prisoner is not some kind of award, there are different political ties, just in the soviet union, there were political prisoners as a rule dissidents and these are different things, politically connected dissidents well, there are political prisoners, yes, the kremlin is close among our people from radio liberty, these are political hostages, but this is it again, these are independent journalists, whose affairs it is for their affairs, uh, uh, they imprisoned, and there was someone there do you remember this tysakh, this right-wing nationalist, well, in principle, he could also be identified as a political prisoner, although

he was an ordinary criminal bandit, well, that is, this is the question of the article in this year, in this case, this is the question of the article, well, cucumbers cannot condemn him for by defeating the lesian debt of recognition, this is more likely . yes, that is about the moment that will allow him to reduce the punishment under the extremist article, and this must be understood because, again, i say, political prisoners are of different types. so why bitter now, well, not now . it was enough for a long time, why did he behave like that? he knew that he was impersonating himself, no, he thought that he had a guarantee of security. it is practically impossible to fully understand the deziks when the red lines change. whoever they are, i can tell you this from my life experience. i remember very well how

events changed during the maidan in 2014-2014, when the yanukovych regime was under pressure from these circumstances because yanukovych was very afraid of becoming vlad from such a semi-authoritarian regime in a multi-party country with the opposition began to turn into a totalitarian regime incredibly quickly they passed these laws in principle dictatorial systems when the maidan began i was just there independently of journalists who criticized the government after about 2-3 weeks, in the eyes of this government, i was already a bandit and a criminal, i did nothing, i did not call for the overthrow of the regime from the podium of the maidan, i called for negotiations to find a national compromise, but with

i met a person who said that she studied with me in the same school, it is possible. that is why they said that there will be a sweep of all those who stood on the stands of the maidan, and i said and what about me, i do not violate anything, i do not make extremist statements, i make correct political slogans, i support the european integration , which has always been supported by the fact that the president met with those who are in favor of a european e-e interview, well, get ready, and a few days later a mass campaign began on my compromise, i could have predicted it at the moment from the beginning of the maidan i couldn't until the end, that's why i can tell you that it's dangerous water, but i didn't think that it could happen so quickly , and after a few days, people already started, people who are bandits who started breaking the door to my apartment. well, it all happened

literally in a few weeks, that is, the fear of losing power led to such a contest, it would be just a criminal regime, it became a gangster regime , you understand, and its main suppliers became outspoken gangsters like kernese, somehow , some aunt there, and do you remember that gangsters started coming to kyiv to terrorize the population and ordinary people, it is without bitterness. and if we remember that these people who were in kyiv at all, who did not think that such a thing could happen to them, that they will go and terrorize the peace in the city, some of you do not understand people, this happens practically according to such a scenario. he's girkin, he's connected to the game there, they tell him you can criticize the regime, it's a lot of letting off steam , so on, so on. it would even be a tragedy if they deposed putin, it was god's answer to the beautiful putin

himself, he must hand over power to a serious heir . well, he must have thought that he was talking absolutely. i would have said sensible things. he didn't notice and people, it's also important, people who are his curators, the head of the intelligence department of the general staff, or where else, could not have noticed this once and for all, we don't know what will happen next because it will be exactly yes the story itself is how the victim will be kept in prison, they will make him a victim, and then they will make him a larger-scale opposition political figure because i can. they decided that it would not be possible to promote him at the expense of telegram channels, and therefore it is necessary to promote him at the expense of some criminal cases as a mass

and therefore, as navalny himself already says that girkin is a political elm, and then when the politically connected begin their political activities in the new conditions, then navalny can no longer take his words back and say no, you know, you show that he was not political, i know he was an ordinary provocateur, so they actually create possible numbers for him in the patient does not convince him of this, just so that we do not fall into the same trap again, because they construct these traps all the time, we follow them and we need to try it's not easy when it comes to the kgb , believe me, we need to try to somehow get ahead of them, you know, because with the chekists there is only one way to squeeze them out. they have to kill you in any way or deceive you in any way, that is, well, it is difficult , but it must be done. therefore, we must always

miss that there is another possibility of situations not only on the field, on the front, so uh, here they are, here we are in fact, the whole main burden of this war is a hybrid one, because the propaganda apparatus is working all the time, different narratives are being launched, people are trying to get used to seeing something all the time. that's how sh- it's just that you have such a government that doesn't want to negotiate with us, you can negotiate with us, i'm like that just bad now that the russians have already made so many mistakes, they cannot work here, but they are working in the west quite successfully . you understand, we also need to save ukraine and that nothing happens to russia, because it is important to us because of its influence on central asia

. so, i like that statement, and i am very interested. they really think that the russians will help them in central asia, that is, what they still want to know about putin, what he called, that is, you know it conditionally speaking, how all the time, eh, yes, in some nettles, all the time running to take care of and no. well, we still need to go to the negotiations to talk, maybe from this time on , they can't do anything, this time they won't stop. they say that you should return to a man who pesters you. maybe this time i'll come and he'll be sober, maybe he'll beat you. that means, after all , this is already a very dangerous political logic. forward to not caught up by the way, not only these americans, whom you just mentioned, but also in germany they were so unpleasant this week , i forgot the pain, i seem to have published exactly

what the counteroffensive is advancing slowly and not they are not satisfied with how our supposedly military personnel they learned the knowledge they received in germany about the war , the introduction of the war, and yet there was a member of the bundestag from the christian democratic party merkel, what is his last name kizi kizi veter, i honestly do not know as correct. however, he said that ukraine still needs to give weapons and cannot be criticized in this way, he spoke out against this, but it is still unpleasant that such publications appear . diverse, we just got used to the war in the first place, which was so tough with huge casualties among the civilian population that everyone says the same things to the west, the western media, different

people are different, not everything, everyone understands, russia is working quite hard with all these people, someone convinces someone it doesn't, but you know that the rules of journalism are to listen to everyone who wants to talk to you and there will be a lot of such publications, we just need to work with western public opinion at the expert level , including and you need to realize that this is a text that belongs to a western newspaper, it belongs to a western publication, this is not the truth in the last resort, because in any case it is clear that there are also living people working there, and then it is obvious that you understand , again, when we talk about a hybrid war , about a real war, it is not of great importance that the western media write about the pro-ukrainian offensive, whether it is slow or fast, the results of the offensive will be clear on the battlefield, if there are no results of the offensive on the battlefield, then you can write 155 complimentary articles in the new york times well, yes, but it will not happen well, if , on the contrary, ukrainian cities are liberated, then

no one he won't forget, not tomorrow, he won't remember any article, any condition given by bil, and the publication bil prints there a large color map and the liberated territories and will explain perfectly to you why they were liberated well, this deputy is exactly what he is talking about the counteroffensive may not bring the results that were expected in the west because there are not enough weapons , there are no tauruses, so he says, “give us the taurus demo of long-range missiles. in your head do you understand it as with the war as with the victory also does not see you can for a long time we live in such a world everyone sees his zelensky who he likes his victory which he likes and his results of the offensive and besides

that in our heads everyone has a reality, the reality of zelensky's possibilities, according to the agreement everything with putin, it turned out to be completely different, but it was a reality and not what his voter saw, which he also faced first of all in his head , the reality of what will be the victory we we will see this firsthand and this model is what we will achieve and it will be a victory and the same applies to the offensive. without people, and putin with his war of attrition achieves exactly this, she still cannot win a single victory. she can relatively speaking protect any territory, but no people will live in this territory , there will be just military cemeteries, but mobilization has not been announced yet, the potential is what is this this is what i will simply say because the language offensive is also developing as you can see, it is the ukrainian team of ali from the point of view

of preserving the lives of ukrainian soldiers and getting the results that can be achieved at the moment, history repeats itself again is it possible that we will continue for 20 years? we are still talking about a conflict that can continue for a long time. we can see many different offensives and different operations . they live in a conflict and they are their children and this will grow up wars and this may not be the reality of many others and this too must be understood so i am calm about the texts i am uneasy about the facts but i would like for it to end sooner, for more territory to be liberated and for russia to no longer pose any threat to us, but for this we will need to work hard and, by the way, convince our western allies of this, and we can feed on this more faithfully for breakfast regarding the victory in the liberation of crimea and so on some

are representatives of the ukrainian authorities but this is their assumption and we will live in the world of facts yes, thank you very much congratulations to portnikov for a wonderful broadcast and we only need to say that now you will see our final issue of news which will be hosted by iryna kovaliy we are already waiting for her with the main news of this week, i am sure that the most important events will be covered because the final news release always includes the hottest news of the week, there were many of them and unfortunately not all of us with mr. vitaly had time to discuss iryna dear we are waiting for you now i hope watch this week in the program collaborators traitors of show business who entertain the russian public